Obama – Making Democracy a Dirty Word - U.S. Military Kerry Trumps Rent-A-Cop for Saudi Arabia

Obama – Making Democracy a Dirty Word
U.S. Military Kerry Trumps Rent-A-Cop for Saudi Arabia

When Secretary Of State John Kerry was asked about wither Saudi Arabia was willing to pay for the cost of a military strike and invasion on Syria he said, “Very much so” essentially stating the United States military was a for-hire-security force or rent-a-cop. The Democratic Party War-Dog Obama continues pushing for bombing Syria against more and more Republicans opposed to taking either side in the Civil War of Syria.

When considering the “rules of engagement” in the Middle East when it comes to our Military, “rent-a-cop” is, unfortunately, an even more appropriate description of the United States Military’s dissension into the police force of the world.

We shouldn’t forget that the Constitution provides the means for Congress to raise, support and maintain an army to provide for the common defense and general welfare of the United States. (USC Art.I,Sec 8.), and Syria’s Civil War neither poses a threat to the United States or a cognizable threat to the United States welfare.

In the recent furlough cutbacks I’ve noticed impacting local businesses, there is no doubt the question of money and who should pay for the military option on the table? In my proposed Stong Defense Military Initiative, largely coming as the consequences of Iraq and Afghanistan wars that have run into the Trillion dollar mark for the American Tax Payer, its assumed that if the U.S. Military is indeed used on a particular side of a conflict, that victory should reimburse the use of force through the natural resource or tax and duty of that Country.

In Syria’s case one must ask, if we were to be involved on Al Qaeda’s side with the Muslim Brotherhood in toppling the Assad Administration, isn’t that a bit of a slap-in-the face to American’s who are right now in the very process of re-living 9-11 where the aforementioned groups were involved in the slaughtering 5,000 Americans?

I’m curious about when Al Qaeda or the Muslim Brotherhood repaid America for that cost? When did Obama negotiate the terms of the treaty with those groups as we did with Japan for Pearl Harbor? I’m very curious as to why Saudi Arabia is left out of the “Allie list” with France and Turkey, but they will finance it Syria?

Now Assad has said “no way” to the desired Saudi Arabia financed pipeline through Syria, and Russia with Assad’s Syria has not wanted the competition of oil that would bring. What’s important to understand is that an “investor” doesn’t plan on an investment unless there is a plan to make money on the investment. This begs the question, should the U.S. Military be used for Saudi Arabia’s plan on making money in an investment return?

Obama’s biggest argument for strikes in Syria is that if we don’t it will send a message to the rogues of the world that they can use weapons of mass destruction. Oh, you mean rogues like Al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood we would be doing the work for in toppling Assad’s Administration in Syria?

Let’s be clear here, the U.S., if bombs drop on Syria, has taken a side and we are doing a work that ordinarily would take opposition years to do. We will be taking sides with the rebels who are not interested in Syria becoming the 51st State of the Union.

Now, Obama’s argument is that if we do not respond a dangerous precedent will be set to whom? I’m not sure when Russia or China or any Country in the U.N. last decided to use chemical weapons on their populations, but with Obama’s argument they’ve just been waiting for the go ahead? What sense does that make?

Doesn’t it make more sense to understand that the rogue forces that permeated 9-11 upon America like Al Qaeda, and the Muslim Brotherhood, have much more to gain by releasing chemical weapons onto their population to gain U.S. military support? That is in fact what Russia, China, and even Britain’s parliament have stated with their opposition to U.S. military force acting in Syria.

It is interesting what happened in Libya after the United States Military used by Obama to the tune of billions of dollars to topple Muammar al-Gaddafi Government, or in Egypt where the “Democratic Leader” elected in fact instituted Sharia law, and set about the business of a theocracy so unrestrained that the people literally supported a military coup?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vlLCIMOd-Uk



Does or has the use of our U.S. Military involved in other country’s change the people mentality? The answer is no. What strange phenomena occurred in the United States Revolution with England that proved successful if it wasn’t the fact that it wasn’t a war where a particular “religion” was recruiting warriors for, but a war for independence from a particular religion dominating the government?

In America, even the Muslim’s celebrate our freedom of religion and choice and tolerance, but as a tell, do we see Muslims’ in the Middle East recruiting Christian’s in Syria, or say burning their churches and killing them? I think Glenn Beck noticed over 25 Christian Churches and even schools have been burned in the last month by the "free Syrian Army"?

We must all solemnly understand and ask the question, “How can the U.S. Military be used in a fight for a particular religion without destroying the United States?”, and, “Wouldn’t that be a brilliant plan for the enemies of the United States to employ?”

Obama’s use of military force in some 6 countries is threatening to grow, and in the wake of the U.S. Military deployments in foreign affairs we see a very noticeable offense for a particular religion rather than an institution of religious tolerance that might resemble our own. The world in large part has become much more tolerable of the freedom of conscience and men’s ability to worship how, who, or what they may with respect to the differing Governments. That is amazing progress by example the United States has orchestrated and proven possible.

The spoil of that is very clearly what Obama has set his site on with the support of the U.S. Military bombing over 6 countries since he’s been in the White House office and he’s threatening more based on questionable intelligence that really doesn’t make much sense. The difference we make on the world is ruined when we go in a set up “pretend democracies” rather than showing by example the truth of a Constitutional Republic like the one in which we take a stand.

In fact Obama has almost underhandedly made Democracy a Dirty Word. He uses it as a Usurper of the Law requiring a ‘natural born citizen’[ born in the U.S. to Citizen parents] which he a walking talking violator is of. Should the majority rule? Should a gang getting together that propagates, pushes, and bullies minorities around be allowed to rule?

In the United States the Constitution was created as a protection for minorities: Minorities who were weaker such as women, different races, and different colors. Obama continues his fraud insisting "helpless victims" are the one's we should drop bombs for. If he was so serious he would consider the Constitution sacred for minorities rather than occupying the White house as a fraud.

So, does Obama’s push to strike Syria employ the necessary desire for equity for all? No it doesn’t. In fact he declares this himself when he says “There will be no boots on the ground”! If there’s no boots on the ground there’s a good sign in and of itself that there is no equity or defense for minorities and that it’s a bully tactic, or a fraudulent cause.

This is Obama’s race card as a fraud himself. He’s not a natural born citizen qualified for the Office of the President, yet he sees himself above the Constitution of the United States elected based on the knowledge he pushed and bullied the people with tactics based on democratic bully methods rather than the principles of the Republic for which we stand.

Obama can’t help himself. He is who he is and what he is not is a defender of the Republic for which we stand. He has consistently shown us himself subservient to Saudi Rulers bowing to them. He has largely been responsible aside from Congress in instituting the force necessary for a successful Arab Springs Campaign which with Egypt’s example we could also name the Muslim Springs Campaign.

Is Obama to blame for this? How can we blame Obama when we in our individual districts of Congress have elected leaders who support him and the long form fabrication he handed out from the White House Press core room?

Is it Congress’s fault that we have an ineligible candidate in the White House using our Military to destabilize the Middle East and in so doing, making enemies out of our former allies? What allies does Obama have of the great supporters which have fought for and with us in WWII? France? Turkey?

What is going on Congress? Why don’t you have the courage to take a stand for the Constitution?- For the Republic for which we stand? Why don’t you have the courage to take a stand for the minorities our law protects?
How can you stand for Obama who isn’t any more qualified for the Office of the President than Putin is? How can you embarrass us like this in front of ALL THE WORLD and not expect the ire of the American Public? My law suit in the United States Supreme court was all about our LAW. Judy v. Obama 12-5276. 2012. 2013

You know what Congress? Minorities are going to get this? Yes, women voters, Hispanic voters, black voters, white voters, they are all going to get this and you with Obama will be removed from our government because we all want the law, we all need the law to stand against the usurpation of the law your representing supporting Obama.

In an effort to pursuade Obama to come clean on his Fraudulent Identification, I'd like to dedicate my most popular song "Take It Off" to revealing Obama as the Naked Emperor usurping the Office of the White House contrary to the Supreme Law of the Land our Constitution. Enjoy.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t0V28rwXFf4




Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODY JUDY / CODE4PRES

Double Down Double Cross on Syria

Double Down Double Cross on Syria

If it were not for the Main Stream Media within the United States you’d think bombing Syria was a bad idea; however that is not the case, so we must ask the question why has our Government all of a sudden decided war in the name of intervention was the best option?

Boehner, McCain, Kerry champions for Obama in an assessment that interference between religious factions within Syria is absolutely necessary and within the scope of the United States vital interest, may come as a surprise to the National Security Council and the United Nations, but when considering the agenda of destroying America as a superpower, should not come as any surprise.

Making the United States the laughing stock of the world, Obama in Sweden, makes the case for a military strike on Assad’s Government in Syria for chemical weapons use that Secretary of State John Kerry bellows is without question the responsible party for firing, leading to the deaths of some 1,400 people. (?)

At the same time, as the Rush Limbaugh Show reminded us yesterday, last summer Rebels in Syria against Assad actually took over a chemical weapons plant around the same time John Kerry was dining with Bashar Assad and Britain was selling chemicals to Syria with U.S. knowledge of that.

So the question is, “Would the Rebels we know are led by Al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood, release the poison gas as a tactic to gaining the United States Air force and Navy as an ally in toppling Assad through the use of bombs and missiles they carry, because Obama announced to them the only way of getting the U.S. on board would be to cross the red-line of chemical weapons use on their populations?”

What exactly is the boots-on-the-ground reasoning from other Countries with interest regarding Syria?

Russia’s President Putin announced yesterday a delegation to the U.S. Congress was “timely”, in the face of Secretary of State Kerry’s testimony to U.S. Senate’s Foreign Relations Committee, to influence them against a military strike in Syria. Russia has as big of an investment in Syria as the U.S. has in bases in Iraq. Putin made the reasonable argument it would be military suicide for Assad to be using “chemical weapons” on his population when his own military is advancing in the same territory. It would be akin to killing his army.

China’s Leadership reasoned that interference in Syria’s religious war was unwise. Dependent to the tune of about 75% of their oil coming from the region, China does not want to destabilize that pipeline and reasons; containment of civil war or disagreement would be broadened with the destabilizing factor of outside interference for either side that it would stabilize itself if left alone.

Britain’s Prime Minister Cameron announced Parliament’s vote in England to stand down in supporting a military strike in Syria leading military commanders for the U.S. excusing England’s military Commanders from sensitive military planning strategy briefings. England sold Syria chemicals with U.S. knowledge of that.

Obama now is making argument for military action in the Syria Civil War, with some very interesting reasoning, that if we considered relevant and the tables turned on him, would certainly kick him out of the White House as a threat to our vital interest and a national security threat as ineligible for the Office of the President because he’s not a natural born citizen.

Obama says:
1) His reputation is not on the line – it’s the international community’s reputation that is on the line.
2) His authority supersedes the Security Council’s and the United Nations.
3) International law prohibits chemical weapons use upon populations.
4) 98% of Governments agree with International Law.
5) Profound and dire implications from not acting would result encouraging more violations.


In relation to Obama’s own ineligibility to be President of the United States based on law we would say:

1) Obama’s reputation was more important to him than the United States reputation for its own Constitution.
2) His usurpation of the Office of the President superseded any law within the Constitution demanding a Natural Born Citizen and by an ignorant democratic bully majority instituted him with his foreign birth and foreign parentage against the law of the Republic for which we stand.
3) The United States Constitution is the Supreme Law of the United States and has different qualifications for President, Senator, and Representative that prohibit usurpation by unqualified persons.
4) 100% of the population of the United States is under the ruling law of the Constitution and to amend the Constitution certain regiments and rules must be followed.
5) Obama has bombed 6+ countries without Congressional approval, yesterday called the U.S. military “My” military instead of “Our” as a representative for The People of the U.S., and has handed out from the White House Press Core room a long form fabrication pertaining to his own identity.


The People of the U.S. ,as well the world ,are witnessing the profound implications and dire consequences of the U.S. military in the hands of someone who is not eligible or qualified for the Office of the United States President as a natural born citizen.[ *1 Born in the U.S. to Citizen parents]

Not adhering to this qualification and eligibility requirement has fostered and will encourage more violations of our Constitution most notable recognized as “policing” other countries through force, and instigating the destabilization of Countries including Syria; potentially within three months destabilizing the largest Countries into World War Three.

How important is the qualification of the Office of the President for the U.S. and for the world? Judy v. Obama 12-5276 in the United States Supreme Court, one of the greatest cases ever filed in Court, concerned this vital interest on our U.S. National Security unbelievably receiving no hearing or attention.

Congress now has the responsibility, power, and moral duty to act on Obama as a “disability” [U.S.C. Amend 14, Sect.3] holding hearings on his eligibility to even wield the powers of the United States Presidency or risk the unrestricted powers of war acting as a scourge consuming the world as a profound consequence of their error.

With the sound reason and factual evidence advocating no military action in Syria necessary, the agenda of war seems on its face value the overwhelming desire of the U.S. Government in the hands of your elected officials passing amnesty and leaving the southern border exposed to Iran’s silent army recruitment poised to infiltrate the soft southern border of the United States, especially exposed with our military involved in foreign affairs.

In the spirit that ignorance is war’s best friend while wisdom and understanding are the companions of peace; the best defense from this agenda is your passing on this knowledge to your neighbor, because the two dozen scandals of Obama's Administration in 5 years seem to be collating the OBAMA FRAUD, and that's no LOVE COMMOTION.

ENJOY my latest song
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fIOxJaVeX60



Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODY JUDY / CODE4PRES



*1
Minor v. Happersett
"it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens.."

National Security Scandal Rocks the Glenn Beck Show on Labor Day

National Security Scandal Rocks the Glenn Beck Show on Labor Day
Post Script Update [ At the bottom of this piece is the email conversation between Joe Pags and myself, after he received this Blog]

Today’s Labor Day – last big summer hooray – celebration of work period – and Obama has summoned Congress back to work to find support for a scourge in Syria. I surprisingly got through on a long and heated live- line to The Glenn Beck Show this morning hosted by Joe Pags. (Joetalkshow.com). My comments were handled in a very interesting way, but before I get to that let me just say two different points of view have been brought up regarding Syria on the same show between Joe and Mike who hosted the show yesterday.

Many American civilian people as well as enlisted personal have begun questioning the “national security interest” or ‘vital threat’ that Syria has in respect to the United States. While we hope ‘common scents’ is called a strike and the lack thereof is called a ball, in theory it all depends on who’s behind home plate, on a radio show it’s the Host, in the United States it should be Congress that should be able to tell when something’s not working.

For to many people the fog is hiding home-plate and it’s very difficult to tell wither Congress is smoking crack or there is a genuine hazing happening when it comes to exactly what Congress is doing to protect our National Security Interest, as they pass-the-pipe on the White House spying on every Verizon wireless account, pass-the-pipe on the IRS profiling conservative individuals influencing politics, as well as conservative groups, pass-the-pipe on gun running to Mexico, pass-the-pipe on 400 lost stinger missiles to the Muslim Brotherhood and Al Qaeda as well as the deaths of many in respects to the outlined high profile scandals.

Congress passes-the-pipe with the executive Branch when it comes to anything remotely to do with National Security Interest because in a perfect world the executive branch is the enforcer of the law and the legislative branch is indeed the writer of the law while the judicial branch is the interpreter of the law. On occasion however the rules call for a switch in duty and this was the context of my calling into the Glenn Beck Show as an assist to the problems we are having.

Through every hearing Congress has ever had on the scandals rocking the White House all boiling up and over in the first year of the 2nd term of Obama, we have heard that National Security Interest formulated the decisions that justified the scandals, which are in Obama’s own words “Phony” and in some respects when you demand security and safety you may be surprised to hear me say, he’s right.

Most elected officials know in politics negligence in security doesn’t set well with most Americans who after a crisis look around for heads to roll. It’s like the Warden of a prison sitting in front of Congress telling them he will personally be forced to release violent offenders back into society unless he gets his demand of a 30% increase on the budget.

When you print that in the paper and every Citizen reads it and starts thinking of his children’s windows being broken into by a rapist, or his mother being car-jacked, or business’s being robbed, you quickly begin to assess a 30% raise as reasonable rather than understanding its blackmail at the political table, which is kind of what I think is going on.

Blackmailing a personal individual is illegal and blackmailing an entire society doesn’t make it legal or any better. The problem is elected officials now days are setting dangerous precedent in thinking “if it happens to everyone” there is no discrimination and it’s legal.

That’s how ALL OF THESE scandals are being legitimized. “ We are profiling dangerous terrorist”, “We are not recording all your phone calls”, “We are not targeting anyone particularly on their taxes”, “We were trying to find the bad guys by giving the weapons away”, “We didn’t see a need for security at that embassy even though we’ve been at war in the region for 5-10 years.”

The American People are thinking their government elected officials have literally started smoking crack and become paranoid, delusional, and have lost all credibility in regards to common sense with what’s going on, but they have no idea how to fix it! When the head is sick it is very difficult to have the body performing up to par.

There is only one National Security Interest scandal that Obama cannot use as a defense, but that the American People and their elected officials can use to remove the iniquity acting as a disability and remove it from their heads and that is the qualification demand for the Office of the President.

I don’t know about you, but when it comes to provoking the world to war, sending my children to war, as well as paying for a war with generational theft, I’m not so concerned with what color the acting President is, he better be qualified according to the Constitution. That’s where the line is drawn.

It is well within the concerns of our national security interest to demand a qualified ‘natural born citizen’ which means born in the U.S. to Citizen parents. There is more demanded to being a Natural Born Citizen, then there is to being a Citizen and that is why it is exacted on only one office within our government- that of the President.
I don’t care if Obama or his brother has done a good job so far, we cannot pick and choose what parts of the Constitution we can adhere to, and which parts we can decide to casual shuffle by the way side because they are inconvenient at the time. Construction laws prohibit doing that, even though Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh, and Sean Hannity decided long ago to sell their souls to the Prison Warden for a job.

Obama is a prison warden and he’s using your “stuff” as the ways and means to blackmail you all the while he’s marching you down to the hole in a maximum security prison. What else can you say when the whole of Congress refuses to officially hear the new evidence that has been brought to light by expert witnesses, professional investigators, Candidates with standing, and most importantly a Judicial Branch that has at the United States Supreme Court level stated in short its now Congress’s jobs and only Congress’s job, because they have washed their hands of Obama’s ineligibility.

Now you might be saying it’s been 5 years Cody, it’s a dead issue. That’s not true. In fact in most cases that resemble this it takes at least 5 years to number one- make the investigation by qualified people, number 2- bring the evidence together, and number three – exhaust lower levels of remedies.

How many times have we heard Congress say, “That an issue in the Courts is the Courts and not their problem”? In fact, they say as an excuse many times to avoid looking into a case that, “it’s in the Courts”, as a matter of delegation to the Judicial Branch, and any good attorney would tell you that to get through the United States Supreme Court is a good five year process and that actually is pretty speedy.

So, Obama’s Eligibility has been through the Courts and without exception the Courts without hearing facts of the cases, dismissed them because of a ‘lack of standing’ meaning the Plaintiff’s were not directly injured because they were not candidates themselves for the Office of the President, or, as in my case that the political doctrine question prevented them from hearing the case, which meant even though I was a candidate in the same party as Obama running for the same office suffering unfair advantage, that the Judicial Branch was not equipped to handle election questions on eligibility, even though Obama may be the exception to the rule because there is a long list of candidates who suffered the court’s rulings as ineligible.

So why is Mr. Obama/Soetoro treated so differently? Why did the Courts duck and dodge on him hoping the Legislative Branch would have the courage to handle it in Hearings where there were more shoulders to carry the burden and retaliation couldn’t be pin-pointed so easily?

This to was at Obama’s advantage as it’s a lot harder to get all the members of Congress to vote on something than it is to get any particular Court with a lot fewer members.

This was the contextual reason for my calling the Glenn Beck program two days in a row. I was just astounded that I actually heard the phone ringing Friday and got through to the call-screener. It was pretty funny what happened.
Friday I said “This is Cody Robert Judy” when I was asked by the call-screener who he was talking to. I kind of went through the jest of what was on my mind as he asked me to and I was treated as a definite “ball” coming across guest host Mike’s home plate as he was talking about like Obama will be to Congress trying to get them to send in the scourge upon Syria.

Yeah, Mike was like who gives a crap about 6,000 people who have died in Iraq this year, and the 100,000 or so capped in genocidal Sedan, we have a little girl whose been scorched into the ground and 1500 people scorched by the red-line Obama said couldn’t be crossed so we gotta go in! Mike’s call-screener was like “Thanks, Cody .. I’ll be sure and convey your thoughts to Mike”, click.

Now today’s labor day and the guest host call-screener for Joe Pags was much nicer as I in a consolidated way explained that Obama has used “National Security” to hide behind every single scandal, but the only scandal that Obama could not use “National Security” as a defense was his own in-eligibility as a natural born citizen because he was not born in the U.S. to Citizen parents according to law and in fact a Legislative Mandate with Congressional hearings held as recently as 2000. This is not old fuddy-duddy law that isn’t relevant. A good reading of those hearings by the Judicial Committees and the testimonies given and you’ll find as I did, the national security interest that is vital to our Nation.

One need only understand how devastating war can be and how our world would suffer with a world conflict Obama himself is pressing Congress for, with the likes of Russia, China, and Iran through Syria.

The American General Population prison, Warden Obama has usurped, whose tapping-down and wire-tapping all American Dissent with tactics that even President Richard Nixon would have scarcely dared to think about, is in the minds of Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh, and Sean Hannity, completely legitimate and necessary for every penny their large bank accounts cannot do without.

Why else would the call-screener for Joe Pags today on the Glenn Beck Show, tell me he was following me completely, understand that the information I had made the grade for common sense, and was a fast ball heater coming right down over home-plate for a strike and put me on hold for Joe Pags?

Now the funny part about this I know you’re going to get a kick out of is the way it happened. When I got through he asked me my name. I said “Cody from Utah”. He said “Was that Cory from Utah”, I said, “No, its Cody”. Then he asked me what I thought was a very revealing question as it pertains to their ability to track and dissect a caller with number one the caller Identification phone number and the spelling of your name. He asked me, “ May I ask how you spell that? Is it with a “C” or with a “K”?”.

I thought “Well, that’s a mighty interesting question and why on God’s green Earth would it matter on a radio show unless you were going to profile and target me using my phone number and name on google just like the IRS is doing, and just like the Media has been doing to all Birthers right now who actually hold the demands for the Office of the President as part of the Constitution and want the Constitution upheld as a matter of our vital interest at stake and in such our national security?

The battery started getting low on my phone as I held on for 50 minutes wondering about that question. I could almost see the key boards smoking , and maybe even a couple of calls taking place to clear the context of the Supreme law of the land, the common sense, and most importantly the truth of what I had said.

It wasn’t just me who had taken Obama to the U.S. Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama 12-5276 ,2013, 2012 it was the all of the American People by the Supreme Law of the Land we call our Constitution upon which has been instituted not only by principle but by blood. Millions have died that we might live in freedom and liberty. How do we hold this gift in our hands? How do we say our hands are not bloody when facing our Creator if we haven’t been taking a stand?

I know that’s why I do what I do and write what I write. I could not stand in his presence knowing what I know to be true, and say I did nothing. I oppressed those fighting for the truth, but I want you to forgive me. I’m certainly guilty of many sins, but that’s not one I could stomach after all the investigations that have been done. It truly is seeing a man naked and saying “No, he’s not naked at all. Look at his fine robe”. Even children will run away from you laughing as it were that you were so blind and captivated by the Fraud, sullying about as an enemy to God.

After 50 minutes of holding, the call-screener came back on and said, very sincerely, “Cody, I’m … I’m really sorry. The subject has changed and I can’t ask you to hold any longer. We’re going to have to let you go. Call back another time.”

I said, “You know one of the most endearing traits I like about Glenn Beck is when he’s wrong he admits it and he changes. I’ve seen him say he was wrong about this guy or that guy, or say he was wrong about that issue or this one. And when he does that I respect him. Tell Joe I to have 4 year old and a 20 something year old child and no doubt we are indeed fighting for generations to come and I respect Joe’s libertarian ideas based in freedom and liberty.”
Then the call-screener paused a long moment and said, “Thank you Cody, that means a lot.”, and I could just feel the sincerity of this guys feelings who I didn’t know and certainly couldn’t see. I thought about that.

A man who we didn’t know and couldn’t see , but that we were going to meet, and I wrote these words and put it to a song called “Do What You Wanna Do”. I hope you enjoy it. I know I’m running a little long here and I’m tired to, but that’s not an excuse for me to say to my Creator either. I wrote the words to the song in the video so you could see them and think about them coming from our Creator to Congress and see how poignant they are. It’s really given me something to think about too.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qc5mgKSfOfQ



Oh and by the way, within 10 minutes of my being dismissed and disconnected, in the last hour of the Glenn Beck show, another caller mentioned all of the Obama Scandals, which should show you, and showed me the subject hadn’t changed at all. The only Scandal not mentioned on Glenn Becks Show was the one about Obama’s identity fraud which is the only one that has the National Security Teeth that can eat Obama up and that Obama can’t use ‘National Security’ to protect himself with.


Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODY JUDY / CODE4PRES



Email Comments with Joe Pags
Joe
Re: what the Hell are you talking about?

cut it down to a sentence or two..

thx


Cody
Sorry Joe - I had it down to a sentence or two today when your call-screener politely dismissed me for taking a stand for the Constitution's demand the President be a natural born citizen, which I legally filed as a Candidate for President in the Democratic Party and took clear to the U.S. Supreme Court. Judy v. Obama 12-5276. You talk a good game but with law enforcement's investigation citing Obama's Fraud the Court has seen, you guys are blowing it with the public, as O's eligibility is the only way to use "national security" against him rather then let him use 'national security' as the excuse for every major scandal. You talk BIG when it comes to scandals O can squirm out of but MISS the one he can't. How are we suppose to respect that?



Joe
yeah.. I wasn't talking about that. It's not open lines.. we take calls on what we're talking about. That's the only reason you wouldn't have gotten through..

thx
j


Cody
If you read the post you'll know EVERY BODY KNOWS that's a out right lie, and it was proved by the caller you had on 10 minutes after I was disconnected. I know its not open lines, I got through revealed my intended comment similar to what I just quoted you, held on for 50 minutes, and was let go. 10 minutes after I was let go you had a caller rehearsing all the scandals which poignantly disables your comment 'the only reason you wouldn't have gotten through'. I did get through. You know if it doesn't matter to you that my blogs got 75,000 readers daily, I suppose its not worth the 15 minutes it takes to read it. I respect the hours and hours your working and thank you for that but today you blew it with someone that's not going to let it go.
I also have a son whose 4 and a daughter 24 ;) You mentioned you had a son 4 and a daughter 22 on the show today. I wrote all about it.


Joe Pags

obviously.. you're wound up about something.. but, you called about Obama's eligibility? I was not talking about that today.. period. Further, every case brought on his eligibility has been tossed out for lack of standing.

no need to continue to write. You're clearly not listening.. I did not discuss this today as it's a boring topic with no traction. Like it or not.. the courts have thrown these cases out.

Cody
Yes, the post talks about that and that WHEN the Courts are finished, the Congress can take it up. How many times have you heard that Congress won't deal with it because its in the Courts? Congressional hearings take a little assistance and we're not getting any from you or Glen etc. That doesn't mean O's Fraud is legal Joe. Its not., and while you belly ache about scandals and don't understand that 'national security' has been the reason Congress can't nail Obama on anyone of the many scandals, you don't seem to understand that not being qualified as a natural born citizen, is a national security threat.
I don't know why you Radio Show Conservative Tigers don't get that. Its a real shame.

Joe Pags

your refusal to read what I've responded to you is a real shame. A. I don't have any sons. B. I've explained the courts have thrown the challenges out. C. you are playing right into their hands by trying to divert from real issues going on right now by falling for the deal birther issue. D. I didn't "belly ache" about any scandals today. I was doling out the facts of how he's acted in the Middle East. Move on -- you've got a bunch of pent up anger.. and I'm far too busy picking my toes than to have a back and forth with someone with a one track mind.

thx

Cody

I've read exactly what you wrote and have updated my blog piece with the information that is going viral right now. You know, Syria is one thing you talked about today that could bring us to a WWIII. If Obama was not in the White House because he wasn't qualified do you think Congress would be being sold a bill of goods to war with Syria., do you think any of Obama's scandals would be happening?
The point Joe is while everyone is upset with all of the scandals, not one of them has any power to remove him out of Office accept for the one you find is boring.
Thx


Joe
please look up the definition of viral. Thx.

Cody
The adjective or adverb viral and the noun virality may refer to any viral phenomenon, that is, an object or pattern that is able to induce some agents to replicate it, resulting in many copies being produced and spread around. For example, virality relating to social, cultural, emotional, and affective contagions that spread through socio-technical networks.

Joe
in your dreams.. look it up again.. and get your charts looked at. Call in on topic next time.

thx
j

National Security was on topic Joe- ;) Thanks for revealing all you did today and helping people understand what's wrong with our Country from the Conservative ranks that lost the last general election. How much was that again that got wasted again for hiding O's little identity secret?
Thanks
Cody


From: joe@joepags.com
To: codyjudy@hotmail.com
Subject: RE: National Security Scandal Rocks the Glenn Beck Show on Labor Day
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 22:20:02 -0500

this is my last response to you as you're clearly delusional. You clearly have never heard my show. I not only discussed the issue.. but, I was one of the first to have Corsi and Taitz on. Because I didn't do exactly what your pet topic is during my three hours in for Glenn today is just too bad. Now take your viral imagination and go bother someone of whom you have better knowledge.

Sincerely,

j

Cody
Neither one of those people you mentioned made it to the United State Supreme Court Joe /with a Democratic Candidate for President/ - Neither one of them was a candidate for President in the Democratic Party who started in on the eligibility issue in the Iowa Caucus - went to New Hampshire State Supreme Court then to Georgia's Supreme Court then to the United States Supreme Court. Not bad for someone your calling 'disillusion' wouldn't you say? Thanks for your feed back, I am very appreciative of your efforts.
Sincerely,
Cody