Saturday, December 10, 2016

DEMOCRAT BIRTHERS Trouble for Trump? More reasons to stand for U.S. Constitution State of Trump?

DEMOCRAT BIRTHERS Trouble for Trump?
More reasons to stand for U.S. Constitution 
'State of Trump'

As Pundits weigh in on Election 2016 they continue to list Donald Trump's Birther Stand as simply a Public Relations Stunt, in fact Glenn Thrush POLITICO's chief political correspondent included that within his in depth and lengthy story of the 10 Crucial Decisions that Reshaped America -

TRUMP'S BIRTHER TRUST CALLED PR-STUNT [Trump had been toying with the idea of running for the White House since 2012, had been quietly polling his chances on and off for years, and loved the attention (and clucking disapproval) of the Washington elites he garnered with his PR-stunt “investigations” into President Obama’s birth certificate and college transcripts. But actually running was something he hadn’t quite been willing to undertake.]

The Huffington Post covered Obama's Interview with CNN with a Story entitled "Barack Obama Says He ‘Absolutely’ Faced Racism In Office" in which Obama himself understanding and knowing about Judy v. McCain and Judy v. Obama says he feels discriminated against in the Qualifications

Watch Obama complain about the Standard of the Constitution's requirements for the Office of President as [ natural born Citizen]( ie. Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents ) in the Face of KNOWING about Judy v. McCain 2008 and Judy v. Obama 2008-2016. It is the tale of his Racism and Division. He wants a different Standard? He wants to be above the Law? That's an Elitist in Action folks. #Democrats #Republicans #SCOTUS

Watch Obama say it on this link also to gain a flavor of the quote below:
Obama continues to cite Birther Movement in Self Adoration

“Are there folks whose primary concern about me has been that I seem foreign ― the other? Are those who champion the birther movement feeding off of bias?” Obama asked rhetorically. “Absolutely.”
Huffington Post Reporter Hayley Miller cited the Birther Movement stating:
[Race has been a constant theme throughout the first African-American president’s two terms, from addressing the all-too-common fatal shootings of black youths by police to enduring unsubstantiated claims about his citizenship from the birther movement, which President-elect Donald Trump has largely led.]

McClatchy News in a story entitled "Obama is rushing to Trump-proof the White House"
writing -

Obama is trying to put the people and policies in place that he wants to outlast his presidency in the final weeks before Donald Trump takes over. And his supporters want more, way more.
Every president tries to push through last-minute policies before their time in office comes to a close. But this year has a more frantic feel as special interest groups push Obama to do more, not just because the president-elect is of a different party but because few people know what he will do.
“People are, as you can imagine, they are getting quite desperate,” said Rena Steinzor, a member of the Center for Progressive Reform, a liberal advocacy group, who is pressing Obama to act. “Filling boards and doing whatever he can to establish protections that Trump would have to unwind is a good strategy.”
Obama seeks to TRUMP PROOF the White House

Read more here:

Hillary Rodham Clinton spent or wasted 1.2 Billion Dollars, twice as much as rival PEOTUS Trump in a Campaign ineffectively labeling the Birther Movement as the movement to de-legitimize the Nations first black President.

Even with the Evidence that points to Hillary Clinton stating when she voted for McCain's Resolution 511 as a U.S. Senator,that the non-binding senate resolution 'may not have 'constitutional weight' or in other words stand up against Constitutional scrutiny

The sponsors include both Democrats vying to be Mr. McCain’s opponent, Senators Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York and Barack Obama of Illinois, as well as Senator Tom Coburn, Republican of Oklahoma.
Of course, the authors acknowledge the resolution would have little real influence were the matter of Mr. McCain’s eligibility hanging by a legal thread. Mr. Leahy is skeptical it is needed at all since he believes there is already no doubt Mr. McCain meets the standard. But he said he is willing to take the extra step.
The countdown clock at this time now showing 40 days until Obama leaves the White House and Trump moves in. While Hillary Clinton now has two Presidential Elections that she has lost to not standing up for the U.S. Constitution's requirements uniquely established for the Office of the President and Vice President in Article II. Section 1, Clause 5 the requirement intended to protect the nation from foreign influence, she had to be sedated after losing the last one, one wonders why she cannot see that simply taking a stand for what's right would be the best way to challenge Trump's own Election, even in the Post Election fray of 2016.

The natural-born-citizen clause has been mentioned in passing in several decisions of the United States Supreme Court, and by some lower courts that have addressed eligibility challenges, but the Supreme Court has never directly addressed the question of a specific presidential or vice-presidential candidate's eligibility as a natural-born citizen. Many eligibility lawsuits from the 2008, 2012, and 2016 election cycles were dismissed in lower courts due to the challengers' difficulty in showing that they had standing to raise legal objections.
Judy v. Obama 14-9396 was the most radically dismissed of these because Cody Robert Judy was indeed a Presidential Candidate with Standing and experts have suggested that the precise meaning of the natural-born-citizen clause may be decided by the courts as a justiciable political question as the Pennsylvania State Supreme Court ruled upholding. The best argument listed on page 12 of the following Certioari  involving Sen. Ted Cruz in a ballot Challenge stated in Elliott v. Cruz:

Judge Pellegrini correctly held that it is not an impermissible political question for a court to analyze and determine what an Article II natural born citizen is. But he also held: “Having extensively reviewed all articles cited in this opinion, as well as many others, this Court holds, consistent with the common law precedent and statutory history, that a ‘natural born citizen’ includes any person who is a United States citizen from birth.”
This of course directly contradicts 'construction prohibitions' upon the Constitution.  Article II, Section 1, Clause 5's {natural born Citizen} requirement would than be inconsequential, in contrast or conflict and made moot with the passage of the 14th Amendment. There are multiple SCOTUS rulings that state and hold as precedent that when two or more principles of the Constitution come into conflict both both must be given their just due and neither can be overruling without Amendment.

This affirmation would hold a difference between the qualifications of {Citizen} in requirements for Representative and Senator and President at the time of the Adoption of the Constitution, to the now required {natural born Citizen}.

That difference would be seen as no foreign allegiance by Birth or Parents in the definition stated as the U.S. Supreme Court held in Minor v. Happersett -Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents was never doubted!

Still, Democrats even at the loss of a 1.2 Billion Dollar Campaign in 2016 with Hillary, will fight on to defend a Defacto President whose terms are up by Constitutional Standards limiting a Person to two terms. Why? 

If Democrats in fact respected the U.S. Constitution, let's say if Hillary Clinton respected the U.S. Constitution, she would understand and uphold the two term limits just as directly as upholding the natural born Citizen clause as a total American Allegiance in {natural born Citizen} against Obama holding the Office of President for three terms or at all, because he is not qualified.

Why hold up two terms if your not going to hold up {natural born Citizen}? The conundrum is the most glaring hypocritical stand in the history of the United States, especially now as it relates to Trump securing the Office of President and nominating U.S. Supreme Court Justices! They are , Hillary is a RepubliDemocrat- she was Republican first Democrats, and remember Republicans have far more Candidates in the wings who are not natural born Citizens including Rubio, Cruz, Jindal all mentioned in Judy v. Obama 14-9396 that the U.S. Supreme Court dismissed based on failing to pay the money because of poverty in affect denying Justice because of Price for Sale. 

Cody Robert Judy stated, "Do you know why Donald J. Trump doesn't like me? It's because he only really respects rich people who have made a pile of cash as his Secretary of State interviews show and have in common? I'm the only one the MSM couldn't call Racist based upon my equal protection of the constitution's natural born Citizen requirement for President against McCain and Obama. Romney- Exxon CEO Rex Tillerson  Ford Boeing CEO Alan Mulally all multi millionaires who actually may have business interest abroad."
Exxon CEO Rex Tillerson Expected to be Trump's pick
for Secretary of State reports New York Times 

  He respects people who have made a lot of money like him. He respects less those who have stood up for Principle and in the process did not win. I don't think Trump really respects the energy, pain, and suffering being a true birther has been. There's probably more truth to Donald Trump riding the Birther's coat-tails than of Birthers riding his."

 Donald Trump never gave a dime as far as I know to any Birther Candidate with Standing when he was not a Candidate and we could have used help for legal expenses. In fact I'm getting ready to call the President Elect Dim-Witt-Donald for his lack of Principle towards the Constitution, Law, and Order. Trump's on target like a light bulb that flashes on very strong, but fades and dims just as fast." 

If Hillary or Democrats cared in the slightest about the nation, if they psychologically didn't in fact support Donald J. Trump in the White House, don't you think they would come out and take a stand against Barack Obama with this legal foothold to stop Donald Trump? That just proves to Democrats everywhere that Hillary Clinton was a joke and actually supported Donald Trump though she led on she was an opposing Candidate for Democrats. 

If the U.S. Supreme Court in fact challenged Obama's ineligibility with a Justice Ruling of Judy v. Obama 14-9396, found unjustly canned within the next 40 days, and had a ruling finding Obama is not eligible, how with those circumstances changed, could the Election of 2016 possibly be seen as anything other than Constitutionally Fraudulent to the conditions the United States of America actually was in and the American People actually able to Vote with those conditions understood? 

It's as fraudulent as lying to the Public in order to get elected. The whole system is rigged and we'd need to either schedule another election or Congress would have to do something. Maybe we hold another election and Hillary wins when Obama is found to be a Fraud? Maybe we have an Election next year and Trump is put on hold for now until it's sorted out? The Senate has the ability to appoint a President pro tempore

This is why frankly, Donald J. Trump should reconsider Hillary Rodham Clinton for Secretary of State, she totally supports him and Republicans, just as they have supported Obama. Trump never filed a single paper or ballot challenge against Cruz, Rubio, or Jindal with the standing he recognized he had.  

If Obama's found ineligible by the U.S. Supreme Court, and Donald J. Trump is found to be a fraudulent Birther even as Obama is found to be a fraudulent defacto president, does he still have the Vote of the People that Hillary called his 'base'? What is most certain is a whole bunch more questions need to be asked.

Gina Lowden wrote in speculating why Trump would meet with Romney for Secretary of State after all Romney's criticizing was to silence oppositions : The strategy of candidate Trump in this election was positively fascinating for this psychological analyst to watch, and I have to admit, I am even more excited to watch his presidency. But, we must be careful not to view Trump’s actions through the prism of the old political playbook or we will continue to misjudge and underestimate him just as we have for the past 17 months.
What is very noteworthy for Media Pundits is that considering the amount of Birther Bashing that they and Hillary Clinton did with Trump and that not affecting the Constitution's defined Electoral College means they have been barking up the wrong tree if their intent was to stop Donald J. Trump at all. If their intent was not to stop Donald J. Trump then of course they have been supporting Trump all along and rigging the election away from Hillary. Truth to consider.

EAGLE RISING presented a stirring featuring [Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio lost his re-election bid this year. However, he has indicated that he and his Cold Case Posse Investigator Mike Zullo plan to hold a final press conference before he leaves office to once again expose the fraud that Barack Hussein Obama Soetoro Sobarkah is be clearly demonstrating that the documents he has posed as authentic are actually fraudulent.] 

One thing for sure,


Thursday, December 8, 2016

DEMs Delusion or Demolition? 100% FILIBUSTER Proof Destroying the Minority

DEMs Delusion or Demolition?
100% FILIBUSTER Proof 
Destroying the Minority

SENATE FILIBUSTER DEATH? The Key to the Senate Filibuster was that it gave the Minority Party power encouraging compromise with opposite party members to get laws passed. With the work conducted of NV-D. Sen Harry Reid that compromise to the minority came to a slower crawl where now it's more about simple majorities.

The danger is obvious in that purest form of Democracy "Might is Right" or the "Candy land of the Bully". Where it really begins to hurt is when the Majority in Congress is opposite the President.

It's a brain crawling experience to wonder why the Founders gave filibuster power to every Senator. But it sure was an incentive to be included in the UNION wasn't it? Smaller States in population had an Equality of Footing in at least one Branch and part of Congress. Was a magnificent long term vision for [The United States of America].

The Senate six (6) year Term was a vision of longer site than the short term two year (2) Representative. So was Sen. Harry Reid's vision short or long term? He acted like a Representative in the short two years between 2008 and 2010 and jammed Obamacare down the throat of America.

With the Super Majority he had he did not consult with Republicans. It was Bully all the way, and it cost Democrats favor with the People who understood, Minorities need rights too. 

Let's read that again slightly differant. Democrat Harry Reid denied Minorities the rights afforded by our Founders. Yes, it was in the Senate, but now look at who is the Minority.

The Minorities in our Country are set up to take the fall, Senator Harry Reid pioneered as a Democrat. If you campaigned with that as a Republican you'd get every vote of Minorities, oh wait a minute, Donald J. Trump just won. Do you think that happened with just the caucasion vote Democrats? 

The beauty of individual rights was embodied in the U.S. Senate and Sen. Reid took a swipe at it just as quickly as opportunity presented itself as a Super Majority. The result should be a reminder of what we already knew.

What does that say about the Trust we should give Minorities when they do become the Majority even for a short time?

How is it that Minorities can build Trust when as the Example they put in and use the "nuclear option" when granted seats of power? Barack Obama was a minority, in the Office of President , he chose to violate the [ natural born Citizen ] requirement of born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents; the requisite since those who were patriot Citizens at the time of the Adoption of the Constitution. Art.II, Section 1,C-5.

How did Barack Obama act as a Minority in the Office of President? He acted as a Usurper. He acted as the walking talking violation of the Office he was. He laid and presided over another 10 Trillion of debt upon the shoulders of Americans that is 70K on every man, women, and child in the United States. He increased and encouraged illegal immigration. And most importantly, he was the poster-child of Democrats losing more seats in Government than even President Jimmy Carter-Over a thousand seats across the Country.

So, do Minorities feel safer now Republicans control super majorities in a majority of States? Do you as a Minority understand the value of a Constitutional Republic over a Bully Democracy where even one person has individual rights?

The wisdom and understanding that comes with this Respect and Honor is not on the upswing in our Country. It's failing and falling. What Republicans do now in the Majority may well be a tell.

My Example of Taking A Stand as a Minority Presidential Candidate for Truth -standing up for the [ natural born Citizen] ie. (Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents) in two U.S. Supreme Court Cases ( Judy v. Obama 12-5276 & 14-9396)  has been blown to bits, ravaged, pillaged, discriminated against, raped, murdered and you could say crucified. That is the message to Truth our Government in the three Branches has given. We prefer the Lie?

Is the unpopular Truth more attractive to women than the Popular Lie? Do they like loyalty or are they happier in being told lies? Is the unpopular Truth more attractive to blacks than the Popular Lie? Is the unpopular Truth more attractive to any minority than the Popular Lie? Why than is the Lie popular at all?

Barack Obama's being a Minority in power should cement itself in our Memories that having a differant color, or religion, or sex is NEVER a guarantee for protection against Corruption and that character comes from within. It's not about what you look like on the outside, but who you are on the inside that counts. Every heart is red and blood pumps in and flows out.

There are circumstances of age, time, and place that we have set in the Constitution as minimums that are represented as guardians of Truth, Wisdom, and Understanding. That is what is popular over the long term and it's the heart of success for any Country. If that has become despised hated and of no popular interest the Population is on course for Lies, Knee Jerks, and Manipulative self interest rather than cumulative interest and sacrifice for one another.

It will be as if they have declared themselves as Gods and God shall indeed lend them the devil. Yes and when they see they are fooled, coming into the Prison that awaits them, there is weeping, wailing, and knashing of teeth.

Can you think of a better description of Democrats losing the 2016 Election? Hillary Clinton had to be sedated. 

So we see Harry Reid retire after being clobbered by gym equipment and presiding over the greatest losses over eight years Democrats have known in modern history as if nothing should change? Stating Democrats are in good shape like Sen. Reid did, is a fundamental delusion of soundness ,or the devil satisfied with the lake of heated waste on Fire and Brimstone. 

Harry Reid- December 2016-
"everything is just fine with his party, thank you." "They have Trump, I understand that. But I don’t think the Democratic Party is in that big of trouble,”

To transform hell into heaven actually calls for Standing up for Minorities instead of back handing us. It actually requires standing for Truth over the Lie. It's pretty simple but it requires standing up for Character over Color, Race, or Sex; and not freaking out over the Truth. 

 Jesus Christ indeed is a long haired hippie whose Male and olive Caucasion. That's a recipe Democrats actually hate right now in their Elected Leaders and it shows. 

So, should Republican's Restore the Filibuster to the U.S. Senate now they are the Majority? It would seem if they were acting like wise servants with understanding to the U.S. Constitution and Minorities they would .  Restoring what was good is never a bad thing, neither is protecting the Minority. I guess we'll see.


Wednesday, December 7, 2016

TRUMP's TRICKIEST TEST - Secretary of State Pick


Secretary of State Pick

CHINA NOT SO HAPPY After reading the following article you can easily see why President Elect Trump's choice for Secretary of State is a tough call. Preferred Trade and cheap labor has ensnared or lured away some of America's finest Corporations fundamentally hurting America while helping many other Nations - China being the biggest.

The problem is how do you negotiate with an unfair Trade history, and keep your Trading partner happy. China has been the biggest benefactor of what America in Trump now is calling a very bad deal.

America lost a core Principle of standing up against slavery in the devaluation of currency- China's dictatorship insist upon their population at times cutting pay and wages and trading that for volume in order to lure the American Businessman away.

Profits as high as 90% have made American Businesses and Corporations filthy rich and they didn't have a problem with slave wages off American shores. Republicans and Democrats laid aside the influence of Trade to encourage human rights for profit.

Now China has hooked many businesses and through their prowess got America on their profit nipple weaning away and learning to feed oneself may cause the next Secretary of State the greatest headaches.

Weakness in this position could cause the greatest problems and with Trump's interviews and public statements of four finalist, we are staring weakness in the eyes and the foreign powers know it.

I won't go in to detail about those weaknesses, but it's pretty safe to say, Trump's the exclusive four in top considerations for Secretary of State
have reputations in critique that are weak.

While they also deserve strength rewards in many areas the balance in many respects it seems will be Trump's Secretary of State constantly undercutting Trump's Campaign Pledges in favor of the status quo.

Trump's consideration may be in getting more of a pacifier for Secretary of State, and if that's the goal he has four strong choices to choose from. Perhaps, he should also consider former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton?

One thing for sure if you didn't think China was calling shots and dictating terms to the next U.S. President you'd certainly not read this article's opening describing exactly what I just related-

[Beijing (AFP) - Donald Trump is a "diplomatic rookie" who must learn not to cross Beijing on issues like trade and Taiwan, Chinese state media said Tuesday, warning America could pay dearly for his naivety.][ YahooNEWS Share
'Rookie' Trump must fall into line: China media]

["Provoking friction and messing up China-US relations won't help 'make America great again'", said a front-page opinion piece in the overseas edition of Communist Party mouthpiece People's Daily]

Team Trump has widened it's door now to more than the original four presumed for the position of Secretary of State seen at an article in the Washington Post [ Corker is one of an apparently growing number of candidates that Trump is considering to be his chief ambassador to the world. They have recently included Corker — who supported Trump during the campaign — former arch-rival Mitt Romney, former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani, ex-Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman, ex-U.N. Ambassador John Bolton; Exxon head Rex Tillerson and West Virginia Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WestVa.).]
The President Elects picks thus far as well those needing to be filled, are easily viewed on this link at the New York Times article and was reported in a Fox News report to be filling the Cabinet on pace faster than records since 1968.

UPDATE Consumer Protections Update from our August 12th Post Square Up not so Square

Square not so Square
POLITICAL RETALIATION After an initial positive experience with [Square Up] for over a year in my Business, as soon as my Political Views crossed their Boards and Presidents lines, the nightmare began... and I'm a Democrat!, But I sued Obama for Constitutional Qualification Violations to the U.S. Supreme Court 12-5276 & 14-9396 as a Presidential Candidate myself.

I can't began to express the cross-over childish and unprofessional tactics Square has exhibited in collusion and cartelish retaliation with info coming from step-sister company Twitter as part of their social algorithm in discriminating against Customers. BEWARE! 95 DAYS to get my Money! A Quarter of a Year! Horrible Business principles of fairness and equality masked in a shroud of non transparency and murky language that I'm seriously so upset about I'm thinking it deserves a Federal or State Case Number in violation of Commerce Clauses and Consumer Protections

On a lighter note we here at the Cody Robert Judy Blog would like to celebrate with you our 700th Post. Gosh, we want to thank you for the Success and Joy we have had in Serving You this year. We have much to be grateful for but you are high on our List. I noticed yesterday a surprising number on my Blog Post 700th entry! Very few were just 1 Page long, so I know we are way over 2000 Pages. Now we're celebrating 390,000 Views all over the World. Most are in the USA, but Russia has a respectable 16,000 Views on this Blog!

❤Freedom & Liberty is a Beautiful and Wonderful Feeling to the Soul of the Human Being that enlarges and swells the Heart magnificently. The Principles we have fought for in throwing off the chains that bind us are felt by everyone. While feeling a part of the beautiful World we live on, we celebrate our unique American Heritage and History with the sentimentality of Patriots and afford all the same respect and love for their Country.

We wish all a very Merry Christmas and may you have a Happy New Year!


As part of that new year we are excited to announce the Formation of THE GOOSE CHARITY GROUP which if you are interested in you can receive a quick 8 minute overview of the 501(c)3 tax deductible charity we are in the process of setting up. 

Introduction to Goose Charity Group  Founded to Help and Assist Males in Marriage , Divorce Recovery, and Represent in Public Advertisement Education of the devastation of divorce from many views.  GOOSE stands for [Gentleman's Oppressed Offended Support Establishment] and has goals to teach and support Men in Marriage deter away from Divorce and Assist in the event of a Relationship Break up. See GOOSE ON FACEBOOK
501 (c)3

If you would like to Give of Gift this Holiday Season as a Founding Booster of Goose, you may do so at the following Link and we Thank You for that Today.