Saturday, June 13, 2015

BREAKING NEWS: U.S. SUPREME COURT Qualification CONFERENCE to TRIAL Case Judy v. Obama- Judy Tees Off on OBAMA-DEFAULT!


FEATURED EDITORIAL The Post&Email
BREAKING NEWS: U.S. SUPREME COURT Qualification CONFERENCE to TRIAL Case Judy v. Obama- Judy Tees Off on OBAMA-DEFAULT!

It is probably the most [a]cidic and [o]dd circumstances used as tactics upon the United States Supreme Court ever devised by the Respondents, to completely fail to respond, but that is what is being done by Barack Hussein Obama in the highly controversial case Judy v. Obama 14-9396 set for Conference in the U.S. Supreme Court just six days from now. What remains to be seen is if the 'Triple Bogie' for Obama is seen as Par for the U.S. Supreme Court, and that Par is good enough.

OBAMA HAS FAILED ALL OF THE 'SHOULDs' that LEGAL EXPERTS AGREE UPON

The Rules are verily simple that after a Cert is filed a response is due 30 days afterwards. A brief
in opposition, sometimes colloquially referred to as a “cert opp,” must be filed within 30 days. Sup. Ct. R. 15.2.,and Obama failed to do so hooking his T shot far to the left and landing in another fairway entirely.

The rules do not require a respondent to file a brief in opposition or other response to a cert petition unless the Court otherwise directs. See Sup. Ct. R. 15.1 (“A brief in opposition to a petition for a writ of certiorari may be filed by the respondent in any case, but is not mandatory except in a capital case… or when ordered by the Court.”).

If a respondent decides to forgo its right to file a brief in opposition, the Court’s waiver form, which also serves as an entry of appearance for the respondent’s counsel of record, should be submitted within the time allowed for filing a brief in opposition. Although filing a waiver is not mandatory, a respondent who does not plan to submit a
cert opp should file the waiver form, which is available on the Court’s website. See Waiver, Supreme Court of the United States, http://www.supremecourt.gov/casehand/waiver.pdf This is Obama's second shot on a Par 5 that lands him in the sand trap.

While filing a Waiver is not Mandatory even that does require a signature and the Court in Judy v. Obama 14-9396 does not have one. This is the ball hit out of the sand trap hitting the opposing wall of the sand trap and rolling back to the feet of Obama now three strokes behind and headed for that triple bogie.


HOW TO APPOSE A CERT POSITION
[The alternative—waiting to see whether, based on review of the petition and any supporting amicus briefs, one or more
Justices are interested enough to require a response—may place a respondent at a disadvantage. See id. at 256.

By opposing a petition at the outset, a respondent eliminates the risk that one or more members of the Court may form a subjective opinion leaning toward granting certiorari before considering the respondent’s point of view. Chief Justice Rehnquist once said that:
“[w]hether or not to vote to grant certiorari strikes me as a rather subjective decision, made up in part of intuition and in part of legal judgment.” William H. Rehnquist, The Supreme Court, How It Was, How It Is, 265 (1987). It is clearly better to have an early influence on that decision. Needless to say, most lawyers would prefer to avoid having to advise their client that the Supreme Court has just agreed to hear a case after you voluntarily waived the right to file a brief in opposition to the cert petition.]

The Court normally will not grant review without first issuing a “CFR,” a for “call for response,” which the Clerk will issue upon the request of even a single Justice. See David C. Thompson & Melanie F. Wachtell, An Empirical Analysis of Supreme Court Certiorari Petition Procedures: The Call for Response and the Call for the Views of the Solicitor General, Geo. Mason. L. Rev. 237, 242, 247–48, Vol. 16:2 (2009).
HISTORY OF OBAMA FAILING COURT DIRECTIVE

The history of the Court not only giving Obama latitude most pro se litigants are not afforded is legendary. In fact as the Petitioner Noticed to the U.S. Supreme Court in a highly unusual Motion for DEFAULT JUDGEMENT UPON RESPONDENT FOR FAILING TO RESPOND TO THE COURTS ORDER OF A MAY 20TH RESPONSE, the Petitioner hailed Obama's as being coddled by the Courts to the point of injustice.

While in the process of exhausting State Remedies Mr. Judy as a Presidential Candidate in the Democratic Party was challenging Obama's ineligibility at the first T which was an executive court ballot challenge in 2012. This was not even in the Judicial Branch's authority as yet but was an executive branch court. The Judge in the case, Judge Malihi ORDERED, Obama to make an appearance or respond by Counsel and Obama's attorney instead high-tailed it to the Secretary of State in Georgia stating they would do no such thing. The Secretary of State told Obama if he didn't respond he did so at his own peril. Accordingly, Obama set precedent that if charged the best defense was just to not show up to Court. Both he and his lawyer failed to show up for court in violation of a subpoena to do so. At the hearing Obama sat mulling over the defense contracts that had just been arranged with the State of Georgia to widen the ports and build defense equipment. Not surprising, Malihi made a turn about and not only personally excused Obama but slammed the Petitioners witnesses and evidence to the wall.

Mr. Judy as a Presidential Candidate appealed the decision into the Judicial Courts of Georgia clear to the Georgia Supreme Court, which obviously still had "Georgia's best interest' rather then the Country's best interest at stake. This was appealed then to the U.S. Supreme Court which also failed to hear the Case in Judy v. Obama 12-5276.

The circumstance was recently revisited in Malihi's Court but had a dramatically different outcome as the defense, a candidate for office was ordered 'off the ballot' and the Secretary of State in Georgia complied with the Judges ruling.

From the Petitioner Candidate for President 2016 we heard today, " Normally, the Court does require a Response 30 days after the Petition for Cert is filed. Obama's due date for that was May 20th, 2015, and here it is June 12,2015 and still we have not a legitimate and certified response. There is a Waiver filed on the docket of the Court, but the Justices have not seen that is not recognized and is invalid because it doesn't even have a signature on it. Virtually anyone could have filed that including Russian President Vladimir Putin. There is absolutely no way to discern who that waiver is from. None, so it is as if the Government and Obama, both served this petition independently, have neither made a response. This is highly unusual and odd."

"Defaults are generally a lower Court proceeding and that happens when a Respondent fails to respond after being served. This actually happened in my lower Court Case but the lower Court refused just like Judge Malihi in Georgia to recognize service and decided after six months of litigation to dismiss the case. Again, very odd and unusual and we of course appealed.

"First we went to the Denver based 10th Circuit Court and they refused us twice. This is not unusual with a highly political case they think really should be reserved for the U.S. Supreme Court. There are many scholarly opinions now urging the Court to hear this kind of a case which has two Presidential Candidates at the head, one insisting the other is not qualified. It is a very difficult case to procure judicially and is like the ark of the covenant before the U.S. Supreme Court.

"Normally, we would see a lot of headlines on this kind of a case, but it's seems like the Media has jumped in the tank on this one. On this Blog posted May 22nd Obama's waiver showed up on the Court Docket. In that post three cases were cited as evidence that just because a 'Waiver' is filed, doesn't mean the Court is necessarily not going to hear the case. The three cases were cited showing 'Waivers' filed and Cert Granted. A "formal response" was also requested by the Court either the day it was posted for Conference or about five days after the Conference was set.

"More than five days now have elapsed on this Case since it was set for Conference. This is realistically bad news. What we would call 'Dead-Filed', with no Amicus Curiae's being filed on either side of the issue. None have been filed for Obama and none have been filed to date for myself, the Petitioner in the case, although any and all were formally invited by me on the Docket Report entry number two (2)- "Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from petitioner.".

"Of course I had hoped America and those opposed to Obama would be on board in wanting to see Justice take place and Sheriff Joe's Cold Case Posse Report holding that Obama's identifications in selective service registration and long form birth certificates are forged be heard in an friendly Amicus Curiae brief to the Court. It is stunning to see that there are no Citizens, or Groups of Citizens in any organization who have filed any thing especially given the wide publicity this Case has seen in shattering circulation of well over 30,000 views the last month.

"The greatest Response from those who you would think able and willing has been something a long the lines of this COMMENT-OF-THE-DAY we featured today in fact. i.e., [Pictured Comment]
It just is a FACT that when a case does have a "Amicus Curiae" or Friend of the Court Brief filed on behalf of one side or the other, that it does place the Case in a higher priority for the Court to hear.

" What can I say, I'm deeply disappointed a few thousand dollars couldn't have been pooled together for a group of concerned Citizens to get one filed. Its as if the People want Justice, but want it free also. The price of Justice while reprehensible to think of in a bribe, is no less important as having a price to defend. Indeed, can anyone deny this in the blood that has come at the price of establishing the United States of America? What price is that? Well, blood comes much more expensively than does the paper money and coins in our pockets, but even that was needed to supply the Army with rifles and bullets and cannons and pay for the soldiers willing to establish and hence defend the Nation.

"Pointing out to the Court not a single Amicus Curiae or Friend of the Court Brief was filed on behalf of Obama, defending his eligibility as well as Ted Cruz's, Marco Rubio's, and Bobby Jindals who are now Presidential Candidates for 2016 is a recognizable fact, but one that might be along the lines of allowing the Court an ease of sweeping the dirt under the table and no one noticing.

As a last ditch effort to show the Court that Obama is no friend or gentlemen to the decorum and process of the Court, I have indeed filed today what is termed a " MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGEMENT ON ORDER OF THE COURT FOR RESPONSE MAY 20TH 2015 "

Judy v. Obama Judgement for A Default U.S. Supreme Court



"of course I don't know what else can be done that hasn't been done from my person. I mean, obviously, the Waiver is unsigned, obviously even the Court's own provided Waiver requires a signature. Both the Government and Barack Obama have failed the directive of the Court and it is up to the Court to decide what to do next.

"The Conference of the Court for the Case will indeed be held June 18th,2015 just six days away now and I have outlined for the Court in very simple terms that the Respondent's were served at every turn from the beginning. Now there is one principle that defines for us the Courts ability to do exactly what I am asking the Justices to consider and that though unusual REQUEST for a DEFAULT JUDGEMENT ON ITS OWN ORDER.

CAN THE U.S. Supreme Court issue a DEFAULT JUDGEMENT ON ITS OWN ORDER, when it is an Appeal from a Lower Court?

"The term that makes such a thing possible is called a TRIAL De Novo Review. As fortune would have it, I requested this in my Petition for Writ of Certiorari. Under de novo review, the appellate court acts as if it were considering the question(s) for the first time, affording no deference to the decision(s) below. Legal decisions of a lower court on questions of law are reviewed using this standard. This is sometimes also called the "legal error" standard. It allows the appeals court to substitute its own judgment about whether the lower court correctly applied the law.
A new trial in which all issues are reviewed as if for the first time is called a trial de novo.
"Under the Trial de novo review, the U.S. Supreme Court can look upon the Case as if it has original case jurisdiction. This would be as if none of the District Court or the Circuit Courts decisions existed or had ever seen the case. Obama and the Government were served the Case as if they had not been served, and it was to a great deal of trouble that I did this, but it might well have been worth the effort now.

"If the U.S. Supreme Court is an Original Court set under the standards of a new Trial, then DEFAULT for a Respondent and not showing up, and not answering, and not following the decorum or edicts of the Court can be seen as meritorous reasons for DEFAULT JUDGMENTS. These could include awarding me with the sum total of what was asked for in the law suit which would be $140,000,000.00 U.S. Dollars split up between the DNC and Obama's Campaign Corporations. Now if the Court did that do you suppose we would see that deer-in-the-headlights stare from the likes of the DNC and Obama?

"Of course we won't know what comes out of the Conference until after the Conference, but these are now possibilities that must be considered legally binding upon the Respondent(s) and acutely within the borders of the United States Supreme Court powers."

[Cody Robert Judy] The Restoration of Justice is the Restoration of Hope for America!

HOUSE KEEPING NOTE:
Cody Robert Judy's FB page has filled up with 5,000 so we would ask you to join the new and growing list of supporters on FB here! Pass it on!

We hope you will not spare your Contribution today in the Res-TOUR-Ation of our NATION and support Cody Robert Judy for U.S. President today.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION

1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.

Thank you to everyone who is and has contributed just a little here and just a little there, for we are working very hard in using the little that we do have as efficiently and proficiently as it comes in, as I'm sure everyone would agree. Please consider a contribution
Let's make it Official and support a Qualified Candidate whose has dedicated his time and talent to taking a stand for America. Let's raise a million dollars and give you the right to say, "I'm not an Idiot, I'm a Patriot!".

INSPIRING - I believe in You
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7d-FcfeCPlI

Thursday, June 11, 2015

BREAKING NEWS - 7 Day Count Down! SCOTUS CONFERENCES OBAMA INELIGIBILITY- CONGRESS NEXT



[Cody Robert Judy] The Restoration of Justice is the Restoration of Hope for America!

BREAKING NEWS - 7 Day Count Down! SCOTUS CONFERENCES OBAMA INELIGIBILITY- CONGRESS NEXT
Obama Conference of Ineligibility in U.S. Supreme Court. Government Considers what IF Questions

Just seven (7) days now until the United States Supreme Court considers Obama's Ineligibility in the Office of the President upon the Standard of Qualifications known as 'natural born Citizen' - ie. [Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents]. Obama of course fails this Standard and in such is a walking talking violation of the Constitution and the Standard for the authority that WE THE PEOPLE have demanded for that Office consistently represented on Record of this 5 Year old Blog. A very Quick Cheers to You as we Celebrate your incredible Response to what has been written here.

Of course with an offense of Ineligibility in the Office of the President- comes first the 'allegation', then 'investigation' then trial and then comes the 'conclusion'. For the U.S. Government it was private corporation Judicial Watch who uncovered the enlightening evidence through a FOIA Request that re-opened the Benghazi Investigations that had been closed by Congress. This is a perfect witness of something the Government should have got right the first time but didn't and it taking the public or private enterprise to get to the truth. The Truth came out with a public Citizen source who actually did the leg work forcing Congress to re-open its closed case.

This is brought up as a very modern and media publicized account for example of a Responsible Citizenry and an Irresponsible Government. The same philosophy applies to the INELIGIBILITY ACCOUNTing of Barack Hussein Obama in the United States Supreme Court Judy v. Obama 14-9396 set for a conference of the Court June 18th, 2015. In the example Cody Robert Judy as a Presidential Candidate, with Standing and damages to his Campaign in 2008 and 2012, directly cited the ineligibility of Obama using the qualifications of the Race for President, outlined by the U.S. Constitution in Art. II. Section I, Clause 5. Congress screwed this one up and its taken an un-elected or public Citizen to bring the action back for Justice. We know its not the first time and it probably won't be the last. Congress actually hasn't had 'standing' to challenge the issue either and therefore at times and circumstances like this relies heavily on the Public and the Courts for Justice. It should be noted I as a Candidate for President do meet the natural born Citizen qualification to be President as I was born in Idaho Falls, Idaho to Citizen parents.

The Constitution provides the exact language that a President can be elected and still fail to qualify in Amendment XX. Certification of Congress does not make someone who is ineligible and or unqualified, eligible by the Standards of the Constitution. Of course the Legislative Branch doesn't even have the responsibility of interpreting the Constitution. Their responsibility is 'making the law' and the Judicial Branch's responsibility comes into interpreting the law, accept under the explicit TRIAL conditions in the U.S. Senate which even than the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court heads. Those parameters make a challenge to the Standards of the Office of the President proper in the U.S. Supreme Court brought to them by a Candidate for President, even though un-elected, much the same as Judicial Watch ham-stringed the Investigation of Congress with new information that had to be considered in Congress's oversight.

Of course in 2008 no one knew who Barack Obama was. There was no long form birth Certificate for a law enforcement investigation to look at and until a person actually becomes a Parties Nominee a Challenge to their ineligibility is considered premature by the Courts. That makes for a waiting game that certainly becomes perilous in the time constraints and expectations of the Judicial Courts unless a Plaintiff happened to get lucky in the lower Courts. Luck has not been favorable upon those decried "Birthers" by the Main Stream Media while the lower Court Judges who are subjected to elections themselves worry like politicians propped up in front of the boob-tube.

It is only the United States Supreme Court Justices who have been given lifetime tenure. That was given to them by the People in the Constitution as a guardian of our Rights without restraint of pandering to popularity. Burning the United States Flag in protest of corruption within the Government was upheld by the Court as an act of free speech some 26 years ago this month, just as coloring the Prophet of the Islamic Faith is protected under freedom of speech whilst it is in direct conflict with that religions teachings for its congregation. Subjecting a whole population to a religious tenant by force is a tyrannical Theocracy and that is not how the United States of America was at least designed to operate in its defense and respect of more than one, multi or diverse religions. This was extrapolated with Fox New's Megyn Kelly and a guest of hers May 8th,FREEDOM OF SPEECH IN AMERICA UNDER ATTACK and her guest Eugene Volokh.

The principle is not foreign to Christians found in the Bible's book of Isaiah 29:21 and even in the LDS B.O.M 2nd Nephi 27:32 invoking the Principle of freedom of speech. The designs that a Religion would kill or enslave a population to prison for free speech should be maintained as 'foreign' in the United States. Our Criminal Code and Civil Rights are designated protections from being beheaded, and imprisoned. This also requires a vigilant population who is educated/informed of where the lines are drawn from facts to fiction and a Justice System allowed the time to see the matter out in order. Where speedy trials are denied however, there is also the danger of 'instant justice' being seen as a positive incentive for the population as a discouragement and apathy sets in. The circumstances consistently show the wise understanding our Constitution provides.

SECURING THE PROTECTIONS OF THE VOTE

The U.S. Supreme Court Justices are given to make decisions that may not be fully supported by a bullying population when it comes to protecting individual rights as it becomes necessary to secure those for the minorities. The sacred turf of freedom and liberty seen in protecting the 'individuals vote' can not be over stated as fundamental to the foundation. The Judy v. Obama 14-9396 Case of course pitches three strikes in this regard declaring Obama ineligible and the votes cast for him made in contempt of honoring every persons right to at least vote for a qualified candidate.

To secure that right, an allegation of fraudulent identity has been brought to the Court for its consideration as well as the allegation of Obama's failure to qualify as a 'natural born Citizen' by not having two Parents who are U.S. Citizens. The doctrine that foreign influence in the history of a person for two generations be kept strictly American is found in Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents. One of the misconceptions is seen in the facts that 'natural born Citizenship' can be walked into or earned by immigrants who come here legally stay and have children eligible to be President; but also can be walked out of by for instance a natural born Citizen incorporating foreign influence by marriage and moving out of the United States to start a family in a foreign land. The guarantees that the children of mixed foreign affluent parents as well as foreign birth maintain the same rights to the Presidency is a false narrative to the protections upon which that qualification was established in the first place.

Its not as if America doesn't offer its immigrants the ability to govern up to the U.S. Senate as "Citizen" is the distinction made for that high office, but the United States holds a reward for those generations who stay and propagate families in America in the reservation of the Office of the President, regardless of race, gender,or religion. Judy v. Obama 14-9396 is a legal action against Obama and his enablers personally as well as those in office legally within the DNC. The action depicts the damages resulting from the fraudulent actions of identity upon myself as a Candidate, but the Court will consider it a fraudulent action upon Voters much more in their considerations than the mere damages to my person.

CONSIDERING THE ACTIONS OF GOVERNMENT FOR EXTRICATING OR IMPEACHING A USURPER OR UNQUALIFIED PERSON IN THE OFFICE OF PRESIDENT

COMMENT Question to CRJ:
Good luck with your endeavor. I truly pray he is exposed. I worry though. If he is impeached, will this actually mean that he will have to first be "considered" as being a president in order to "be" impeached? Furthermore, will his executive actions be legitimized if not overturned by the courts?

Cody Robert JudyJune 11, 2015 at 6:53 AM
@Anonymous 6-11-2015 @2:55AM Up late burning the after midnight oil I see. Good Questions. There can be different types of "Impeachment" under the Guidelines of "Impeachment" proceedings. For instance a "Disability Impeachment Trial" and a "Crimes and Misdemeanors Impeachment Trial" may be brought against one who is elected but not qualified (Amendment XX) as well as an Offense while in Office that would be considered illegal.

It is with this understanding that I have used the words together and not meant for an "Impeachment Trial on the Grounds of a Disability to Execute the Duties of the Office" to be the same as Impeachment of a Qualified President.

The Senate really has the Duty to Remove anyone from the Office of the President who is there illegally for any reason and the word impeachment is used lightly and can also be used for a Usurper-President which is one who was elected but failed to Qualify. For definitive purposes impeachment really means the Extrication of Unlawfulness in the Office of the President and being unqualified but stating you were Qualified is a Crime against the Oath of Office, as well through the Falsification of Identification or I.D. Fraud.

Whether offense has come from not qualifying or crimes while in office is really a simple time question that does not prohibit the use of the word we use referring to "Impeachment of a President" or Extracting a Usurper.

Second Question - Will his Executive Actions be legitimized if not overturned by the Courts?

Upon the Grounds of finding Obama ineligible for the duties of the Office of the President as a disability, of course. Any action with the very use of his signature upon it becomes "Moot". We would not follow the orders of a crazy person in Office and Obama in the Office of the President is technically a perfect condition of a"disability" in the Office of the President.

Exposing his actions does represent a kind of conundrum of sorts 'Insanity' against the Constitution. Obama represents an Unconstitutional Insanity. He is a walking talking violation of the United States Constitution. His executive orders are Orders of Insanity. He has imported an army of illegal aliens and charged tax payers for his illegal standing army. He has orchestrated a mandate of force on Americans in Health Care that encroaches upon freedom and liberty. The damages are heaped up like dung every minute he is in that office.

What I think will happen is the Government will have to initiate a FREEZE of Federal Action as well as Personal until a Orderly Transition can be made. I don't think Biden should be a default President based on his being chosen by an Unconstitutional Insanity. All of the Office below the Office of the President are required to follow the Orders of the President, so what I would suggest according to guidelines of the U.S. Constitution is the U.S. Senate appoint a President Pro Tempore until the matter be resolved by Election.

Former President George W. Bush is the last one to hold the Office legally his experience with the Office as a former President would be an insertion of stability in the interim.

Thanks for the Question]
[Cody Robert Judy] The Restoration of Justice is the Restoration of Hope for America!

HOUSE KEEPING NOTE:
Cody Robert Judy's FB page has filled up with 5,000 so we would ask you to join the new and growing list of supporters on FB here! Pass it on!

We hope you will not spare your Contribution today in the Res-TOUR-Ation of our NATION and support Cody Robert Judy for U.S. President today.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION

1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.

Thank you to everyone who is and has contributed just a little here and just a little there, for we are working very hard in using the little that we do have as efficiently and proficiently as it comes in, as I'm sure everyone would agree. Please consider a contribution
Let's make it Official and support a Qualified Candidate whose has dedicated his time and talent to taking a stand for America. Let's raise a million dollars and give you the right to say, "I'm not an Idiot, I'm a Patriot!".

INSPIRING - I believe in You
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7d-FcfeCPlI





Monday, June 8, 2015

BREAKING NEWS - U.S. SUPREME COURT INELIGIBILITY CASE- OBAMA TO RESIGN?


FEATURED EDITORIAL - The Post & Email
BREAKING NEWS - U.S. SUPREME COURT INELIGIBILITY CASE- OBAMA TO RESIGN?

Today on The Sean Hannity Show in a conversation Sean was having with his inside Washington DC correspondent Jamie Dupree, Sean stated that he was starting to think like Donald Trump, that perhaps it was a good idea if we insist Obama's College Transcripts be unsealed and opened. This of course was a swipe at Obama's Ineligibility which is now being entertained by The United States Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama 14-9396. The Court comes back from a break June 15th with a couple of key opinions to be released on Marriage and Obamacare, and will also decide whether to ask for further argument on the case that squarely places Obama,Cruz,Rubio, and Jindal's responsibility to the U.S. Constitution's qualification for a 'natural born Citizen' in its sites.

There is a big disagreement, and when referencing 'big' think of the division in the Grand Canyon type of Big, among the supporters of the Presidential Candidates as to whether the Supreme Law of the Land's demand for a 'natural born Citizen' for the Office of the President means much more than the qualifications of 'Citizen' for U.S Senators, U.S. Representatives. While "Citizen" is used in the paragraph of the Office of the President's Qualifications in a time determined way in Article II, Section 1, Clause 5, referring to that qualification upon those 'born at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution', the paragraph goes on for those born after that time and states they must be 'natural born Citizens'.

The United States Supreme Court is being asked to define the term or what might be better stated as adhere to the term "natural born Citizen" with the litmus test of "Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents by Presidential Candidate Cody Robert Judy in a contest of ineligibility directed at Obama for his Campaigns for President in 2008 and 2012. Cody has never conceded those races to Obama and is the only Candidate to have his objections now before Highest Court. Cody says to those continually discouraging him with "Its about time", that "Hey, getting to the U.S. Supreme Court isn't the same as making instant oatmeal. Instant Justice rarely exist and like a good wine, often cases require what's termed in the Court as a 'ripening'."


WHAT is DIFFERENT ABOUT CODY'S CASE FROM ALL THE OTHER ELIGIBILITY COMPLAINTS?

Cody rattles off many things that sets his Case apart from all the other cases that have also made their way to the U.S. Supreme Court but were not heard by the Court chief among them 'Standing','Party','Jurisdiction','Criminal Complaint','The Political Doctrine Question', 'Bi-Partisanship', Exhaustion of State Remedies', and 'Racism'. When you start going down that list it is much easier to comprehend why Cody's Case has cleared all of these hurdles and very well could be THE NATURAL BORN CITIZEN HISTORICAL CASE OF OUR TIME in the name of Justice that doesn't get 'dead-listed'. Reference: Why Cody's Case is not DEAD LISTED

"This has been a very long journey", Cody said, "and its hard for people who have followed this rather spottily to grasp what is happening and how and why Obama could very easily not make it to the end of his second term before being asked to resign, or impeached for his disability of authority to administer the duties of the Office of the President based upon the People's Qualifications written in the U.S. Constitution that limit with strictness those able to wield the power of the sword and the pen in that office."

Nixon resigned the office of the President because he saw that if he didn't he was going to be indicted in a U.S. Senate Trial for what would amount to high crimes and misdemeanors charges. This was back in the day that Republicans controlled the White House but Democrat's controlled the U.S. Senate where trials of such nature take place. Cody's case however, does not ask the Court to remove Obama per se or intrinsically, but asks the Court to only consider that Cody in the Race both 2008, and 2012 against Obama be treated in fairness and equality to all under the same Standard. If Obama was allowed to run unfairly according to the rules, Cody is due a just compensations for the damages Obama caused.

Many cases brought to the Court did not even include Obama's name and instead cited the Secretaries of the differing individual States as the "Gate Keepers" of ineligible candidates as if they shouldered the responsibility. While running in the Democratic Party after the Primaries were over for instance and Cody was not chosen to represent that party, Cody would go right to those same Secretaries of State in the Elections Office and they would administer an oath to him which clarifies and certifies that a Candidate for Office should he/she be elected be able to qualify for that office. This puts the burden squarely on the Candidate for Office.

In Obama's case there is a document trail of his being bound to that oath, but there is also a document trail that brings into the equation Obama's enablers from the Democratic Party Leadership bench like Rep. Nancy Pelosi who signed in front of a Notary of Public [t]wo separate 'certification of qualification forms' in 2008. One for Hawaii that demanded that those so certified by a major party also be certified with an oath that they were qualified for the Office under the Constitution of the United States for that particular office. The other for the remaining 49 had no such language to adhere to and its quite a credit to Hawaii. So, what is a Secretary of State in an Election's office supposed to do with one person who lies and another person who backs the lie up? These secretaries of states are not independent Candidate investigation people. They mostly 'trust' that what they are being told is the truth, but in the Politics of Obama 'honor and trust' have been violated and Cody's Case brings all of this to light for the Court.

We know Obama was not acting alone, He had accomplices to his election identity fraud. As a Candidate for President Cody at first simply took Obama at his word when it came to Obama releasing his long form birth certificate at the end of April 2011 which he himself handed out to the White House Press Core in his famous announcement calling birthers 'side shows and carnival barkers'. Taking Obama at his word in his own press release, the document states Obama's father was never a U.S. Citizen, making it impossible for Obama to be a natural born Citizen- Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents for the office of the president. Obama's father introduces a foreign influence in Obama's history which was prohibited by the term 'natural born Citizen' in the Office of the President. Over time, it has proven that what was happening is that Obama was conducting a 'side show and was the biggest carnival barker' of all.
[Comment-of-the-Day]
Another aspect of Cody's case to the U.S. Supreme Court is unique in that Cody's case introduces to the Court under the authority of a little used term in a Congressional ACT the ability for someone other than an Attorney General to bring to the Court an allegation of crime. This Congressional Act is known as The Clayton Act which came out of The Sherman Act. These focus clearly on Corporations forming illegal alliances as Cartels in illegally determinations of precious resources, commodities, and services. Especially in Election Years, 'votes' are a highly valuable commodity and service to the Country. Candidates these days form Corporations to shield their private fortunes from liability. The two items form exactly the ingredient for an illegal cartel.

While nearly a dozen high profile stories have been written many highlighted on The Drudge Report about Sheriff Joe Arpaio's case in Arizona that revolves around the investigation of Judge Snow's Family allegations they had it out for seeing to it he was never elected again, and had the Sheriff himself on the witness stand, none cover the Cold Case Posse Report in front of the U.S. Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama 14-9396. What has not been reported, even by WND a stout encyclopedia of stories on Sheriff Joe's Cold Case Posse, their Report and findings that Obama's long form birth certificate was a fabrication and could not have possible come from an original copy of the Hawaii Health Records Department is that Cody's Case in the U.S. Supreme Court now highlights all of this. Indeed the tie between that Health Department and the Obama Administration coming in Hawaii Health Director Loretta Fuddy has sadly and tragically ended with the loss of her life in a very suspicious death and that connection seems lost to the Media.

The Report of the Cold Case Posse originated by Sheriff Joe's assignment to investigate the identification fabrication, has been brought to the U.S. Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama 14-9396, by the authority vested by Congressional Acts to do just that. Obama's Selective Service Registration was also released by FOIA request and was a second witness that identification fabrication was in play as anomalies unfolded in that Report. These are just witnesses that Obama's whole story has been concocted and wasn't true to form. There were slips and mis-steps associated with the lie, and his selective service registration was just one other I.D. that had to be retraced or redacted because Obama as an Indonesian Citizen traveling to Pakistan on a visa at the time forbidden to Americans, was not required to sign up for the draft. The time of this redaction also ended badly for the witness Lt. Quarles Harris Jr., 24, who was assassinated in his car.

Obama had no other reason to oversee or fabricate a long form birth certificate other than to do a disservice to the place of his birth as a Candidate running because of the focus on "born" in natural born Citizen, even though anchor babies are not considered eligible for the Office of the President. This would easily avail the Office of the President open to foreign take over if all that was required was a birth in the United States. Of course the theory represents conspiracy in itself, but it is rather naive to think plans are not drawn up for the imaginations of the enemy or to just as naively think the enemy would not delight in being sworn into the Office of the President of the United States.

With the Cold Case Posse's investigation and REPORT in the U.S. Supreme Court now and Obama's very identity challenged as fraudulent, it seems quite relevant that the Obama Administration would go after Sheriff Joe's 'computer server'. That seems strange only in the light they don't seem to want Hillary Clinton's server while she was Secretary of State emailing what now have been detailed as classified by the FBI and redacted in parts for the Press as well as destroying what she decided to destroy while on duty as the Secretary of State for us.

Cody's Case in the U.S. Supreme Court details why the Court would not necessarily find a particular Candidate like Hillary Clinton interested in bringing a case to the court against Obama for his ineligibility, even though former President Bill Clinton is on 3-16-12 record from credible witness and filming documentary producer Vivian Bettino as stating they would do so at the proper time. This is also in front the U.S. Supreme Court in Cody Robert Judy's Case Judy v. Obama. 14-9396. The alliance between McCain, Obama, and H. Clinton was made in non-binding U.S. Senate Res. 511 which the U.S. Supreme Court is not bound to. 511 was not a Constitutional alteration of the 'natural born Citizen' clause for the qualifications of the Office of the President, although it does detail a source of the litmus test regarding 'parents' which case constitutes Cody's first compelling evidence that it doesn't matter where Obama was born if both his parents are not at the very least "Citizens". This highlights the compelling case Obama used the fabrications as distractions away from his ineligibility by his father's Kenyan Citizenship represented on his first released certification.

The two generation contract America has given to the Office of the President prohibited foreign influence by two generations this way. Congress's own investigations and hearings on the matter in 2002 bear out much of the same affect also noted in the case before the U.S. Supreme Court. It was Cody Robert Judy's law suit against Sen. John McCain in 2008 that included the Republican National Committee served just days before McCain was made the Republican Nominee at the Republican Headquarters of the Campaign and Party in Las Vegas, Nevada. This was precisely the same way in which Obama and the Democrats were served this Complaint almost a year ago now July 7th, 2014. Of course with an alliance of Candidates of those two parties no complaint is going to be made, however an alliance between parties that excludes the rest of the population of America is unconstitutional and troublesome especially given 43 % of Americans now are registered Independents according to a Gallup Poll conducted this year also noted to the U.S. Supreme Court in the case. Reference Viral Post.

With both Republicans and Democrats represented by U.S. Senate Resolution 511 that left for certain Independents out in the cold which now registers a majority of voters. That in and of itself should be a real red flag for the Court's Consideration as to the damages this type of behavior by career politicians is causing and gives prudent reason to set the case at the very least for oral argument. Cody Robert Judy was the only Presidential Candidate in America over the 2008 and 2012 Presidential Elections to call both Parties out on the carpet which as best as can be displayed is not racial or partisan, but is ruled more by Principle over Party. As you can see the Case before the U.S. Supreme Court is much more complicated than just stating Obama was not born here as the detractors like to label 'birthers'. Without laws that apply to all, justice for all is an impossibility, and certainly illegal discrimination's begin taking a foot hold.

Will you please help us prepare for the coming actions of the Court? We need your support in passing this on to your friends and your local press as a 'news tip'. Will you do that for us on your own? If you feel of course like this should be in fact reported because it affects your rights to vote for a Constitutionally Qualified Candidate! Please do not let your rights go unnoticed and unvoiced by just assuming the Media all understands what you now do. This is a complex case but the merits of it are very simple and sink to the root of the nucleus of our Republic. Please add your voice to this case by doing just that. Pass it on, and send it to your local news stations now as a news tip. Cody Robert Judy is working very hard for you as a Champion and we would like to thank you for the 235,000 views now!

HOUSE KEEPING NOTE:
Cody Robert Judy's FB page has filled up with 5,000 so we would ask you to join the new and growing list of supporters on FB here! Pass it on!

We hope you will not spare your Contribution today in the Res-TOUR-Ation of our NATION and support Cody Robert Judy for U.S. President today.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION

1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.

Thank you to everyone who is and has contributed just a little here and just a little there, for we are working very hard in using the little that we do have as efficiently and proficiently as it comes in, as I'm sure everyone would agree. Please consider a contribution
Let's make it Official and support a Qualified Candidate whose has dedicated his time and talent to taking a stand for America. Let's raise a million dollars and give you the right to say, "I'm not an Idiot, I'm a Patriot!".

INSPIRING - I believe in You
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7d-FcfeCPlI



Sunday, June 7, 2015

Res TOUR Ation of Our Nation - Democratic Party Presidential Candidate Gearing Up for Iowa Challenged Hillary Clinton


Res TOUR Ation of Our Nation
Democratic Party Presidential Candidate Gearing Up for Iowa Challenged Hillary Clinton
FEATURED EDITORIAL: The Post & Email
PRESS RELEASE IOWA NEWS:

At least one Candidate for President in the Democratic Party is gearing up to head for Iowans living rooms, to challenge Hillary Clinton in the first Caucus of the 2016 Presidential Race. The Cody Robert Judy for President 2016 Camp is 'gearing up' for the launch of what is being called " Res TOUR Ation of Our Nation ".

The Cody Camp has launched the TOUR with a new wear-gear T-Shirt for supporters that features HONOR & TRUST mixed with a little pride for their individual State within the Res-Tour-Ation of our Nation. This refers to the Honor our U.S. Constitution deserves in the Trust given to the person in the Office of the President by the People stated in the oath of the President to 'preserve', 'protect', and 'defend' the Constitution of the United States of America.

Cody Robert Judy has challenged Barack Obama/aka Barry Soetoro, along with McCain, for their ineligibility as a natural born Citizen(s)[Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents] qualified for the Office of the President going back two presidential elections now.

The United States Supreme Court has announced a June 18th Conference date for Judy v. Obama 14-9396. The Court will decide by a measure of four votes if the United States of America is worthy to hear [t]heir opinion on the qualifications of the Office of the President, or whether it should be defined by University Scholarly opinion and the Presidential Candidate(s) themselves soliciting those opinions from their Alma maters'.

The determination of the case revolves around the foreign citizenship of Obama's father, as well the invalid identification of his birth place based upon a law enforcement investigation concluding the long form birth certificate released by Obama is a fabrication and noticing fraud on upon Obama's selective service registration. These alterations are evidence of alleged crime and cover-up spurring the call that Trust and Honor need to be Restored upon the Office of the President by the checks and balances afforded to Judicial and Legislative Branches of Government upon the Executive Branch.

Cody is the only one to do so on Record as a Presidential Candidate in the entire Nation by the witness of *15 State and Federal Cases for the most part unreported by the Media.

Cody's case does not require removal of Obama from Office, but a compensation for damages for a violation of the rules. The U.S. Senate controlled now by Republicans in the Majority is the Body responsible for any ineligible/disability/ OR impeachment TRIAL caused by a president elect who fails to qualify or has Usurped the Office of the President with fraudulent identification. Reference U.S.C Amendment XX. Thus far, the Legislative Body has been unwilling to confront sure evidence findings and this may well be based upon the Campaigns for President of U.S. Senator Marco Rubio, U.S. Senator Ted Cruz and LA. Gov. Bobby Jindal- all Republicans. Link and Scroll for Appeal.

HOUSE KEEPING NOTE:
Cody Robert Judy's FB page has filled up with 5,000 so we would ask you to join the new and growing list of supporters on FB here!

We hope you will not spare your Contribution today in the Res TOUR Ation of our NATION.


THE CODY ROBERT JUDY U.S. PRESIDENT 2016 CAMPAIGN
PRESS RELEASE END.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION

1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.


Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.

Thank you to everyone who is and has contributed just a little here and just a little there, for we are working very hard in using the little that we do have as efficiently and proficiently as it comes in, as I'm sure everyone would agree. Please consider a contribution
Let's make it Official and support a Qualified Candidate whose has dedicated his time and talent to taking a stand for America. Let's raise a million dollars and give you the right to say, "I'm not an Idiot, I'm a Patriot!".

INSPIRING - I believe in You
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7d-FcfeCPlI