Wednesday, July 9, 2014



Monday, July 7th, 2014 I filed a new 30 page law suit against Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro, his corporation of Organization for Action (OFA), the DNC its officers and the presiding elected leadership of the House and Senate in the Democratic Party, growing out of the ashes of the law suits I filed against Sen. McCain and Sen. Obama in 2008 and Obama in 2012, as a fellow candidate for president, surrounding the United States Constitution’s demand that the Office of the President be filled with a natural born citizen, in the District of Utah’s United States Federal District Court, stemming from the problems this is causing for the future Presidential Race set for 2016 as case number 1:14cv00093 with Judge Bruce S. Jenkins being assigned to the case.

With the experiences so many other litigants, as well as myself, have experienced as failures with the violated principle of the Constitution’s demand for a natural born citizen in the Office of the President secured by Article II, Sect. 1, Clause 5 of the United States Constitution (U.S.C.), this action is a different approach to the same questions. With this post, let me try to answer a few frequently asked questions (FAQs) I’ve received so far for the benefit and as a reference for those who haven’t asked them but are wondering.

Hasn’t this issue been adjudicated already?

If you pictured the law in the U.S.C. that the Office of the President only be filled with a natural born citizen as a whole circle, and understood that there are hundreds of different doors around the parameters of the outer wall of the circle that lead inside, we could say all the doors so far have been locked that the so called ‘Birther Movement’ has tried and the issue has never been actually adjudicated in Court.

This is not to say there haven’t been Judges that have taken the opportunity of the issue being brought to them to throw in an opinion or two on cases that were dead end cases already based on the standard of standing. These opinions you might compare to a patient walking in to the hospital for a case arising from an ingrown toe nail that was handled properly, and then listening to the doctor expanding or extrapolating on the condition of the patient’s heart condition. Of course the heart is connected to the dead toe nail in some ways but it’s an extreme reach of judgment that actually wasn’t called for in the diagnosis or adjudication in kind.

There is now a Wiki Page dedicated to the Eligibility Challenges of Barack Obama I stumbled upon which detail some of these arguments and the case that came to my mind along these lines was Ankeny v. Governor of the State of Indiana, which was dismissed on standing nevertheless received an opinion.

You will notice on that Wiki page missing any of my cases by name but I was a party under the Georgia State entry subject to Deputy Chief Judge Michael Malihi decision which I took to the U.S. Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama 12-5276 but that all stemmed out of whether Obama was qualified to be on the ballot in Georgia. In that case, Obama refused to show up at the hearing on January 26th, which normally would have received a “Default” judgment, but the attorneys arguing the case, as a mistake I think, refused it. On February 3 2012, Malihi recommended that Obama remain on the ballot. Concerning Taitz's case Malihi wrote: "The Court finds the testimony of the witnesses, as well as the exhibits tendered, to be of little, if any, probative value, and thus wholly insufficient to support plaintiffs’ allegations".

What have been the biggest factors hindering this from being properly adjudicated?

Obama has had a lot of help when it came to avoiding the issue of his eligibility. I mean really how many of the rest of us have ever been summoned by a judge to Court, and then had a judge act as your lawyer, and then rule as the Judge on your behalf excusing you for refusing to show up and dismissing the allegations brought up against you without so much as a letter from you? That’s incredible assistance!

I did my best in objecting to the qualifications of the candidates McCain and Obama in 2008 and 2012. In the 2008 case my case was artificially delayed and finally after 4 or 5 “Notices for Judgment” had been ignored by the Federal District Court Judge in Las Vegas, Nevada was ruled “moot” after the election because Obama had beaten McCain. This was a factor of timing in an election much like Obama’s ballot challenge in New Hampshire and Georgia in 2012.

Timing has played an overwhelmingly big factor in Obama’s favor. Judges in my experience as I’ve hinted at have been relatively hesitant to rule on issues “pending” elections. In other words, if the Judges’ decisions had the potential to change the election by prohibiting a candidate from being in the election Judges’ wanted no part of that and have used the “political question doctrine” to avoid such decisions, especially I suppose when it came to the major party candidates.

There are of course many cases where particular candidates have been precluded from being on the ballot when they were not ‘major’ candidates in national elections for major parties. It’s really only been in 2008 and 2012 that the issue has come to have some bearing in the race for the Republicans and Democrats in their choice as a nominee for President of the United States.

Because of the control in the Legislative Branch by those two parties, if a corrupt agreement is reached to subvert the Constitution based on say a good-ole-boys-agreement or cronyism, the only opposition that can object is really an independent candidate for President, and while he wouldn’t have any luck in the Legislative Branch because of the agreement between the two parties controlling that Branch, the only Branch of Government left to appeal to is the Judicial Branch in a Court of law.

Among the legal challenges in the Judicial Branch Courts filed against Obama in the States by far the biggest factor has been a lack of standing. I’d say 98% maybe were filed by non-candidates in the race ruled to have no standing meaning they were basically bi-standards affected by the horror of watching an accident happen trying to sue the party at fault rather than being a directly injured party. It’s a sensitive issue but if the Courts didn’t rule against it, people would in fact be suing the state for watching an accident happen rather than being in one and then suing. Imagine the number of cases increasing in the Court by a 1000% or 10,000%. It would overwhelm the system if standing were not protected as a relative barrier discerning “direct” from “indirect” participates.

Appropriating blame has probably governed another 1 % of cases as many Secretaries of States have been the ones dragged into court rather than Obama himself. This stemmed from a responsibility and accountability of the Secretaries of States as types of ‘gate-keepers’ to getting on State Ballots for the Primaries and the General Election. They’re failure as been relegated as a failure relative to “not proving Obama’s lie wrong.’

Candidates basically swear an oath out that should they be elected they will be able to qualify for the Office they fill, and Secretaries of States receive these as witnesses of the truth. Proving that wrong then becomes an issue that is hindered by again timing before the race and the Judges’ willingness or unwillingness to remove a candidate. Then there are probably a small percentage of the cases that have been dismissed on technical issues relating to the Plaintiff’s not adhering to Court procedure brought on more by the Court’s unwillingness to excuse a gnat for the subversion and construction on the whole Constitution.

Of course typing errors and procedure’s are important, but in kind of a balance on the flip of the coin, rarely is a Judge willing to excuse a murderer because the prosecution failed to spell a word correctly as an error of prosecution worthy of overturning the case.

What makes the case you have filed different?

Many things are the short answer, but in a few basic and distinct differences I’d say reflect a different door approach. First and most basically it’s a Civil Rights Violation case challenging that my right to run as a candidate for President is hindered by a disagreement on who and who is not qualified for President according to the standards of the Constitution. Civil Rights challenges are different then ballot challenges in nature. Civil Rights challenges might be seen as damages after an accident like an injury or wrongful death law suit, where ballot challenges might be seen as preventative care negligence’ before an accident like a defective part recall.

I’m not sure a U.S.C. Ch. 42 §1983 civil rights challenge has ever been filed by a candidate for President against another accept me with McCain in 2008, but I do know that was what scared the crap out of the Judge who delayed his ruling until after the election.

The approach comes from a strong position of directly being harmed as a candidate, under Civil Rights protections bring the blanket down to cover every American from discrimination or unfairness in treatment. As this applies to the presidential races with me as a candidate and Obama, the discrepancy of qualifications that the Republicans and Democrats came to agree upon with U.S. Senate non-binding resolution 511 actually left me and I’d say the Constitution out in the cold.

The major players in that agreement were Sen. McCain, and co-sponsors Sen. Obama, and Sen. Hillary Clinton effectively quartering the Constitution and corralling Republicans and Democrats from future objections on the issue of Qualifications for President or Eligibility, with a penalty of party power attached that might destroy any single member of Congress should it be unleashed upon them. It’s an effective blackmail tool, and I say blackmail because it demands loyalty to an action that subverts the Constitution that carries with it a penalty backlash understood to be a loss of party money and support to get reelected. That’s basically defined as corruption in a secret combination.

Another major Federal Statute that is listed on my complaint representing an entirely new approach or door of legal action in the matter, that I’m almost positive has never been employed by any Candidate for President is that of contesting the “Corporations” of individuals running for Office with the Corporations formed by major political parties like the DNC in a violation of anti-trust laws in much the same way as the U.S. Government came against Microsoft for an illegal cartel, or monopoly.

This is interesting because very recently the United States Supreme Court awarded corporations more of a “human right” as businesses being able to exempt themselves from providing contraception in an effort to opt out when it conflicted with religious or conscientious objection. Candidate for Office more and more seek the protections of incorporating campaigns to protect their own personal liability. My action seeks to hold these corporations that come together with what’s called a tying factor forming basically an illegal cartel, because their action is not in the public interest or for the public good, but rather is bent on destroying or destruction of the Constitution outlining the requirements or qualifications for the Office of the President.

Specific to this is my allegations that The Sherman Act is in violation with two or more separate corporations coming together to form an illegal cartel or monopoly against the public, in restrictions of other candidates. It is the standard of the Constitution that these corporations are subject to because of their specialty or type in the political arena.
Basically, it doesn’t make any sense for candidates to be able to hide behind corporation laws, and not be subject ALSO to laws that govern corporations like The Sherman Act or The Clayton Act as it may apply. One of the benefits of this is it also permits me as an individual to bring to the Court an action of criminality for the Judges’ consideration almost like an attorney general would without my having to occupy that position.

Individuals can bring Corporations to task in allegations of violations of The Sherman Act that actually carry felony charges and $100,000,000 in fines against the corporations, as well felony charges against individuals and up to $1,000,000 dollar fines for individuals in the corporations responsible for fraud or a collusive agreement that forms a monopoly. If the Court were to hear the argument it might have a colossal effect of political parties governing themselves in a much higher regard for the Constitution as a standard.

Violations of Civil Rights and The Sherman Act are definitely actions brought correctly as far as jurisdiction is concerned to the Federal Court rather than a state court and my allegations form a collective argument over a continued process of discrimination, defamation, and libelous standards being afforded the defendants by smashing the standards of the Constitution in the public arena that is working against me as a standard bearer.

It is only the lack of a Court decision on the merits that allows the Main Stream Media to constantly whip candidates with what’s understood to be a negative backlash as a “Birther”. If the Court were to rule on the standards positively, the perception of the public for “Birthers” would dramatically change from a negative to a positive. Thus we see it is a standard of the law neglected by the Defendants in my case that make up the corruption charges of a few people changing in an act of corruption the Constitutional standard in violation of the whole will of the people.

Now, something else is very different in this case. It repeatedly insists this action is NOT brought to the Court with a demand that Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro be removed from the Office of the President. It insists repeatedly that is an action for Congress to take up whenever or should it ever decide to. The only matter this action insists upon is an accountability and responsibility to paying for damages.

In other words, personally speaking, if I had never entered the race as President in 2008 and 2012 and in my election endeavors so far for 2016 all the time, talent, and fortune that has been used thus far in those endeavors be held at the responsibility of the Defendants. In other words, I’m recognizing Obama did win the election, but that he did so at the expense of my injury and my campaigns injury illegally and that demands a responsibility for the injury using the standards of law demanded for the Office of the President in the U.S.C.

The Democratic Party was responsible for 1.4 Billion just in the Presidential Race in 2008 and 2012, thus the statute penalty of $100,000,000 for The Sherman Act Violations represents less than 10% of the total raised by Obama and the DNC in conjunction with only the presidential race, and then as compensatory damages I’ve asked for $40,000,000 that considers damages to my campaign and person over that extended period of time, so $140,000,000 as a modest penalty of subverting the Constitution that might curb political parties in the future from putting unqualified candidates on the ballot or choosing unqualified candidates to represent them. At least if they do, they would be seen as responsible for other candidate’s campaigns and have to be accountable to paying them for the time and money based entirely on breaching the standard of the Constitution’s qualification for any office.

The message here is you may indeed subvert the Constitution’s qualifications for office with a candidates lie, you might also additional corral the majority of members in Congress strongly tied to party power and money subverting the Constitution, but you may not run over independent candidates associated with your corrupt agreements without being held accountable to those candidates in the Judicial Branch’s Courts of Law. This is indeed a very clear part of the check and balance duty that the Judicial Branch has upon the Executive and Legislative Branches and I think my case speaks strongly on that basis and on the basis of rules of reason is accountable.

My case also includes and references all legal findings of the Cold Case Posse on the fraudulent documents provided by Obama to the White House Press core, as well as the investigation on his draft registration, and use of a dead man's social security number, as well as setting on the table two DNC nominations forms of varying attestments, Obama's own bio reporting his birth in Kenya in his literary bio, Indonesian Citizenship through his adoption by step father Lolo Soetoro,and his claim of a Kenyan father as a birth father with the argument that should be honored, and that a dual citizenship is prohibited in the Office of the President as it links in a first generation an alien or foreign citizen ship.

In the realistic terms my argument also outlines the facts that if Obama is not held accountable to the standards in a ruling for me as a plaintiff that he basically gets away with the subversion if the burden of appeal is placed upon me with the time left in the term of office. It could easily take me two years to get to the U.S. Supreme Court with the burden of appeal; however the appeal could still necessarily come into play with other illegal candidates perhaps even running in the Republican Party in 2016.

2016 Candidate for President of the United States

First 2016 Presidential Campaign Commercial

Can you help me out today? Just go right over to my contribution button and do it. I think my taking on the argument alone with McCain and Obama clear to the U.S. Supreme Court is past and now you have to kick in because without you I'm just one guy and I can only do what I've done and that didn't come cheap you know.

Cody Robert Judy
For U.S. President 2016

If you think “Truth” is worth it, support it and quit supporting the lie. That is the beginning of change, or we can just keep on going down this road and see where it leads with Obama. Which is it going to be?


I'd sure appreciate your helping me out in the American Birther Campaign (ABC) Campaign for Cody Robert Judy for President 2016. Thank you for your consideration.

Cody Robert Judy
YouTube: Code4Pres

Sunday, July 6, 2014

Obama's Lead Over His Head: "Ok, Sue Me!"

Today I feel I am called upon to preach a little about the importance of a qualified person in the Office of the President. From this article I actually feel a little sick to my stomache with the hypocrisy involved:

Boehner: Why we must now sue the President
written by John Boehner

[Every member of Congress swore an oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. So did President Barack Obama.
But too often over the past five years, the President has circumvented the American people and their elected representatives through executive action, changing and creating his own laws, and excusing himself from enforcing statutes he is sworn to uphold -- at times even boasting about his willingness to do it, as if daring the American people to stop him.
[That's why, later this month, we will bring legislation to the House floor that would authorize the House of Representatives to file suit in an effort to compel President Obama to follow his oath of office and faithfully execute the laws of our country.
The President's response: "So sue me."
What's disappointing is the President's flippant dismissal of the Constitution we are both sworn to defend. It is utterly beneath the dignity of the office. I know the President is frustrated. I'm frustrated. The American people are frustrated, too.]

[In the end, the Constitution makes it clear that the President's job is to faithfully execute the laws. And, in my view, the President has not faithfully executed the laws when it comes to a range of issues, including his health care law, energy regulations, foreign policy and education.]

One cant help but wonder where Boehner's exuberance is under the scrutiny of the United States Constitution's demand for a 'natural born citizen' in the Office of the President and Boehner's snute ( to smite with an almighty noogie of DOOM!!!)the teeth to really bring Obama toe to toe with the Constitution, not to mention the Republicans.

[There must be accountability. We have a system of government outlined in our Constitution with the executive branch, the legislative branch, and the judicial branch. Congress has its job to do, and so does the President. When there are conflicts like this -- between the legislative branch and the executive branch -- it is my view that it is our responsibility to stand up for this institution in which we serve, and for the Constitution.]

Obama's response is "Ok..sue me"

Facing the fact that Obama knows under the color of law and in the executive Commander-In-Chief (C.I.C) seat there is very little Congress can do. Acknowledging Obama as qualified also bequeaths to him the powers of such and under those powers allows him to say "Hey, you know what I don't think what Congress is doing is very Constitutional, so under my mantle I'm directed to "preserve, protect, and defend" the Constitution from Congress also in a very long drawn out Court battle that last about as long as Obama decides to stay in office.

For once Obama and I actually agree on something; this is exactly what Obama says it is: the House of Representatives showboating just prior to the 2014 elections 4 months away!

The House of Representatives has already passed the 2014 "Enforce the Law Act" in a temper tantrum about Obama's executive action excusing many of the Obamacare mandates they were counting on to make Obama look like the antagonizer on businesses he is, but Obama has successfully maneuvered around the mines Republicans were counting on blowing up Democrats in the 2014 elections, and may I add "barely" to that.

The midsize businesses many who aren't so lucky, even the high end stores are feeling rich people start to pinch their spending habits. ColdWater Creek women's retailer with 365 stores across the country and 6,000 employees has announced its filing Chapter 11 closing its door's and the inside scoop of this is because of the added weight upon the retail chain of Obamacare. Now I would think when you started messing around with a high end retail store 'rich' women have formally supported, you'd start to see the campaign contributions flow south into the campaign chest of a Presidential Candidate who took on McCain and Obama with the teeth in the Constitution that actually has the power to remove such if Congress would hold a hearing on it?

Campaign dollars that would flow to the public in education about the Constitution and the reasons we actually need a qualified president under the Constitution's outlines in the Office of the President. That comes back to the 'mantle' I'd like to preach about if you will allow me the indulgence without offense.

There are so many people who don't realize that its true! The people do hold the power in the political arena with their campaign contributions. If women decided to change the Country that's exactly what would happen, but alas they have been willing to 'skirt' their Constitutional duties not to mention their children's future, (something I would think was paramount upon their minds)for the cash cow which now is dwindling.

Yes, you think that's a joke? Have you even read or paid any attention to Russia and China combining forces to crash the dollar?

Another nail in the coffin is the fact that Washington DC seems to be the biggest contributor to the uneasiness of the dollar by printing out some 10 trillion in the short 6 years Obama's been in Office. It seems Washington DC in both major parties are willing to kick the can down the road a little further rather then trimming their belts and spending habits. Truth be told, they are asking women to curb their spending habits of shopping rather than themselves, and ColdWater is just an example.

They say the proof is in the "signs", ok, you want 9 Signs that China is Making a move against the U.S. dollar? Look at the date of that October 2013!

[So if the U.S. financial system is the core of the global financial system, then U.S. debt is "the core of the core" as some people put it. U.S. Treasury bonds fuel the print, borrow, spend cycle that the global economy depends upon.
That is why a U.S. debt default would be such a big deal. A default would cause interest rates to skyrocket and the entire global economic system to go haywire.
Unfortunately for us, the U.S. debt spiral cannot go on indefinitely. Our debt is growing far, far more rapidly than our GDP is, and therefore our debt is completely and totally unsustainable.]

So are we rotting to the core? The answer is "Yes" and it is in the strictest sense of the word "unfortunate": meaning not profitable in the extreme sense of the word. It has been the hardest thing in the world for me to explain that "PRINCIPLE EQUALS PROFIT"

When we lose our "principles", now please think in terms of the Constitution and Obama's fabricated long form birth certificate, fraudulent draft registration and use of a dead man's social security card often needed for those who do not have an authentic long form birth certificate, we lose our "profit margin".

It might take a little while but its happening and putting the car in reverse doesn't always mean your going to all of a sudden realize those 'profits' are back! What that means is Obama's taken 6 short years to wreck the American dream which we are now starting to realize. Do you think it somehow 'fair' that it might take 6 years in reverse to undue what he and a complicit Congress have done?

Can't help when I say that remember the story of Joseph in the Bible when Pharaoh fetches him out of prison to interpret his dream of the cattle he saw in that represented seven years of plenty and seven years of famine found in Genesis 41.

People have not equated the "mantle" of the President under the Constitution actually is in demise under Obama.

Just for a minute consider the blessings that have come from qualified Presidents; the U.S. has indeed become the greatest power on earth. Now consider the down hill trend we are seeing forcast come to pass under a walking talking violation of the Constitution's demands for a qualified person in the Office of the President. Obama is not a natural born citizen: born in the U.S. to Citizen parents. Congress has the power and duty to act!

Oh come on Cody, it just can't be that simple? Do you think we can really cheat God?

The mantle of God in any position is credited with acting wisely in that position. Decisions are made with what? The spirit that directs you. Why and how did you decide to do anything? First you had to think it, (out of thin air) you come up with an idea to take a different route to school and learn when you get there of a big accident on your normal route.

Providence is something repeated and repeated and repeated by President George Washington that simply cannot be ignored and don't forget it was he and our first Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court who in consulting and considering the Office of the President made the qualifications differant for the President and the U.S. Representative and U.S. Senator.

It is with the most grievous convoluted thinking that one can surmise that route would have been the same with a qualified President verses and unqualified President according to the standards of the United States Constitution.

Do you not suppose in the slightest degree that God in his almighty power has no further blessing to grant the righteous as the wicked? Have you really succumb to the dumb-founding philosophy there is no difference between the wheat and the tares? Why don't you try making bread out of straw, see how that works out for you.

The importance of the Office of the President ranks where in your line of thought? What does that Office actually have the power to do? Well in Obama's history what has he done? Picture this as an example of what I'm talking about.

Picture a man walking around with a 6 foot piece of lead overtop his head everywhere he goes, and picture a President without that lead with just clear air over his head. Now picture blessings and ideas coming down from heaven that are stopped or halted because of that piece of lead over the man walking around with it above his head verses the ideas and blessings freely flowing with the man without the piece of lead over his head.

So why does the Republicans and Democrats both support Obama and why is all this talk of a law suit against Obama from the House Republicans nothing more than flapping jaws in the wind? Well, Republicans have chosen to pitch in with Obama in circumventing the Constitution's Qualifications of the Office of the President.

They did that with U.S. Senate Resolution 511 that granted McCain a non-binding U.S. Senate endorsed 'natural born citizen' ship status that was co-sponsored by then Sen. Barack Obama and Sen. Hillary Clinton which in fact brought both parties into a corrupt agreement.

Are you seeing the hypocrisy of U.S. House Speaker John Boehner yet when he talks about some oath Congress took and Obama took? Yes, they took the oath alright under the pact from the devil that the truth and a lie were all the same.

Now if your not mad about this and you don't see any "value" to what old Mr. Judy is saying to you believe me your gonna get pancake batter spread all over your face before this is over and find skunk spray in your perfume and cologne because you stink to high heaven! Can you just hear Pharaoh now, "So let it be written, So let it be done"?

You know I see a great patriotism in the People in the United States of America. My gosh where does that come from? It comes from a great love for the founders and framers who sat down and pondered a few problems they were having and decided that the appropriate way to handle them was with the iron pen that transcribed the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution.

I'm honored to serve in the capacity of taking a stand for those who have served and given limbs, lives, and fortunes for the American Dream. I've heard it said of me before speaking of everything I've gone through since 2008 sueing McCain and Obama and Obama in 2012 clear up to the U.S. Supreme Court, "This can't be healthy Cody, give it a rest". Really?

Can you say that to George Washington and the those who transcribed those documents that have literally carved and forged out of the mountain against all odds the greatest nation on earth that has rolled out and subdued the earth from nothing? You know in the most depressing times of turmoil I face against all odds I continually ask myself, "am I right?", "am I wrong?", what does the law say and why was it so carved? What was the purpose of the qualifications of the President?

Just stating "Its the Law" doesn't really attribute the importance of the mantle of the President. A lot of people try to make it personal for me saying I just have "something" against "Obama". Irrespective of his not being qualified for the Office of the President I can say whole hearted that he is a very talented individual that is being kept from the mountains of gold in the United States of America because of that piece of lead over his head and we in the United States of America will suffer every day the Office of the President is not filled with a qualified individual.

Unfortunately again, Congress wants to prove it to us and the American People keep contributing to the Republicans and Democrats and starving Independents like myself. So be it, United States Women, maybe you don't like shopping at the high end stores who am I to say? (smile) I can only say your nice retail stores are disappearing.

Can you help me out today? Just go right over to my contribution button and do it. I think my taking on the argument alone with McCain and Obama clear to the U.S. Supreme Court is past and now you have to kick in because without you I'm just one guy and I can only do what I've done and that didn't come cheap you know.

If you think “Truth” is worth it, support it and quit supporting the lie. That is the beginning of change, or we can just keep on going down this road and see where it leads with Obama. Which is it going to be?


I'd sure appreciate your helping me out in the American Birther Campaign (ABC) Campaign for Cody Robert Judy for President 2016. Thank you for your consideration.

Cody Robert Judy
YouTube: Code4Pres