Thursday, October 22, 2015

BREAKING REPORT: NATURAL BORN CITIZEN POLITICAL SCRIMMAGE ROUNDTABLE


BREAKING REPORT:

 NATURAL BORN CITIZEN POLITICAL SCRIMMAGE ROUNDTABLE


What do you get when the Leading Obama Conspiracy Doctor, Reality Check Radio, a Former Cold Case Posse Investigator, and a Presidential Candidate with U.S. Supreme Court Cases under his belt get together on a ROUND TABLE Discussion? 

Well, "Shake N' Bake", THAT just happened!

I came on with a question for Doc Conspiracy (Kevin Davidson) at about the 90 Minute mark which was about the fourth quarter (30 minutes left) and the Show went two 15 Minute OVER TIMES!

The below link does allow you to skip to any particular time. I would like to transcribe the discussion but am limited to time right now, my comment below reflects my general feelings about the round table.

SKIP ON DOWN this Post to [THE POLITICAL ROUND TABLE DISCUSSION] if you'd like to give a Listen Now.



THOUGHTS on THE ROUND-TABLE DISCUSSION

CRJ HIGHLIGHTED COMMENT REFLECTS THE
SENTIMENT THAT THE SCOTUS HAS NOT HEARD A CASE
REGARDING THE NATURAL BORN CITIZEN CLAUSE OF THE
CONSTITUTION IN ITS HISTORY AND REGULATES PRECEDENT
TO CASES HEARD OVER CITIZENSHIP
The outrage of Political Punitive indifference the U.S. Supreme Court has demonstrated is over now three Presidential Election cycles, MILLIONS of Votes, BILLIONS OF Dollars regulating [natural born Citizen] to precedent cases of [Citizen] instead of giving an ear to a unique aspect of our Constitution between Presidential Candidates with Standing for the Office of the President. That's nothing to be remembered in U.S. History over.

The current SCOTUS Court has thus far refused to hear a Case on the merits between Presidential Candidates. I feel this is a huge dis-service to the General Public.

In the Round-Table Discussion I made clear that we should not expect Republicans or Democrats in Congress, for the most part, to entertain this discussion mostly because of the partnership that was formed between many Leaders in the Congress at the time, three of which constituted the Major Candidates for the last three election cycles in Sen. Obama, Sen. Clinton, and Sen. McCain.

As I wrote in my Certiorari included with the Link the tragedy of that is the U.S. Supreme Court is not supposed to be serving Republicans or Democrats per se by Party over Principle. The U.S. Supreme Court is suppose to be concerned more with political neutrality or very important independents from the political fray.

With that Principle in mind, we see that remaining 'silent' on the [natural born Citizen] for the Court is in essence abandoning that part of the Constitution in a 'destructive but controlled demolition' much more than respecting the 'political doctrine question' Doc referred to in the discussion.

The two Cases referred heavily to as [Precedent Cases] in the ROUND TABLE were for myself *1Minor v. Happersett and for Doc- Mr. Davidson
*2 United States v. Wong Kim Ark . Both of these cases were about establishing 'Citizenship" or about established 'Citizenship'. Neither of the Cases involved any Presidential Candidates or involved as a focus or cross-hair [natural born Citizenship] in regards specifically to the qualifications referred to the Offices of President and Vice President as distinct and unique from the Representatives and Senators.

*1The Minor v. Happersett ruling was based on an interpretation of the Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Supreme Court readily accepted that Minor was a citizen of the United States, but it held that the constitutionally protected privileges of citizenship did not include the right to vote.

*United States v. Wong Kim Ark169 U.S. 649 (1898), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that a child born in the United States of Chinese citizens, who had at the time a permanent domicileand residence in the United States and who were carrying on business there other than for the Chinese government, automatically became a U.S. citizen.[1] This decision established an important precedent in its interpretation of the Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution.

To assimilate the discussion of relativity in those two cases as the 'closest thing we have to a 'Precedent Case' on a Candidate Qualification specific and unique for the two highest offices is about as disrespectful to the Constitution in my humble opinion as you could possible get. This should outrage America!

Adding further insult to injury, if you have read my last two Post here, and here,  you will know that the U.S. Supreme Court considers my case "Closed" due to insufficient funds. Its true, after millions of votes and billions of dollars in America's Presidential Election, we don't have the funds to get the
Court to administer Justice to us in our Presidential Elections.

My Motion to proceed in Forma Pauperis was denied by the U.S. Supreme Court. These Motions are generally filled out by litigants who do not have enough money to pay the Court Cost.

The Federal PDF Form is provided by the Court and generally include information an Applicant must provide for a Year.

That understood the U.S. Supreme Court received mine that has been GRANTED by the two lower Courts, including the Federal District Court (Utah Division) and the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals.

Upon the same review in basic certainty of income, the U.S. Supreme Court granted the exact same Motion in 2012 also. It is therefore seen as a 'punitive measure' upon the poor for the U.S. Supreme Court not to grant my MOTION TO PROCEED, upheld in three Courts before. It is not a jump to conclusion to state that this was a trick up the sleeve of the Court that really should enrage Americans in the interest of JUSTICE FOR ALL.

It is also not a far gone conclusion to state that when you are 'very close' to success the door slams shut for erratic, nefarious, and radically extreme reasons. Of course the SCOTUS can do what the want under the guidelines of 'Good Behavior'. Outside of those measures an "Impeachment" process exist for 'Bad Behavior' and that is orchestrated through the U.S. House of Representatives as has been indicated in the proposed RESOLUTION sent to the House of Representatives, including Trey Gowdy conducting the Benghazi Hearings now in Congress, by hundreds of Citizens.

  Another point was brought up in the discussion in which I deferred I had not thoroughly read. That was the Tribe Olsen Opinion. I referred to Gabriel J. Chin's argument which I had used in Judy v. McCain, and this rebuttal was in fact correct. The Tribe-Olsen Opinion stands on the ground of 'citizen' grounds of the Wong Kim Ark decision referred to above. It rest on the laurels that the jurisdiction of the United States Constitution exist outside of the States regardless of apposing jurisdictional claims which in my opinion is grotesque and prevalent of foreign disrespect.

If you look closely at motive for these pretended Constitutional Scholars you come up with a constant theme of character rather and over principle. The summary is that it robs Principle, and is instructional of a bear Constitutional Cupboard. The Tribe Olsen opinion was written by 1 Republican for McCain and 1 Democrat for Barack Obama. There you go.., those are the 'characters' twitching like devils to escape the 'Principle' of 'natural born Citizen' ie. born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents.

The exact same thing happened when the 2016 Year Presidential Cycle begin with U.S. Senator Ted Cruz and two former Solicitor Generals of different administrations advocating 'character' over 'principle'. ON THE MEANING OF NATURAL BORN CITIZEN was created ,authored and featured as a Harvard Review by Neil Katyal and Paul Clement, and essentially further tears the Constitutional Qualifications for the Office of the President down to include only the exclusion of someone born outside the United States to foreign parents. U.S. Senator Ted Cruz's name is even mentioned specifically in what they term a 'unbiased opinion'.

Motivation Motivation Motivation.. my Legal Actions in Civil Court have demonstrated an integrity to the 'motivation' in the first place ascertaining that [natural born Citizen] was included as a protection in the interest of our national security regardless of [character], and predicated upon [principle]. If that rubs someones nose wrong, so be it.

The entire purpose in my scholarly opinion and standing as a Presidential Candidate in now three general elections for the Office of President is that the term [natural born Citizen] used in the Constitution's Article II, Section I, Clause 5 was predicated upon as a key that could not be unlocked for a period of time that consisted of two generations.

This completely eliminates first generation Americans in either direction. Meaning, you can earn it and you can lose it. First Generation Americans such as those legally immigrating to the United States after becoming U.S. Citizens could have children who were then considered [natural born Citizen] eligible for the Office of President.  In reverse, a [natural born Citizen] could marry a foreigner and their child would not be a [natural born Citizen] based on the dual citizenship earned from both the father and the mother. Those born in the U.S. known as anchor babies were indeed [citizens] but and their children would then be the second generation considered to be [natural born Citizens] eligible for the Office of President or Vice President.

What this does is eliminate any possibility of a foreigner assimilating to the Office of the President that has any allegiance by a Parent or by a Place of non-jurisdiction considered outside of the U.S. Constitution or the States. In the ROUND TABLE discussion you heard that Hawaii was a territory until 1958 and if Obama would have been born in that year rather then after Hawaii became a State in 1959 he would not have been eligible. I agreed with this., but Brian the author of the comment refuted his own Tribe Olsen representation as scholarly with the example.

Doc and RC kind of ganged up on me regarding the "Foreign Influence" remark I made regarding John Jay's letter to General George Washington. John Jay was to become the first Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court and of course General Washington became our First U.S. President.

There is a constant barrage against those serving as our first presidents from either not being born in the U.S. or for having a foreign Parent. The Constitution itself left leeway for that in what we commonly refer to as the grandfather clause. Many people strongly disagree with the exemption of those who were the Revolutionist, but logic would have that those fighting for what would be the U.S. Constitution could not possible have been born in the United States under the authority and jurisdiction of the U.S. Constitution.

Thus, firmly, our Founders agreed a necessary authority was needed to grant those fighting in the Revolution a path towards the Office of the President including everyone at the time. They articulated it very well in stating in Article II, Section I, Clause 5, that "Citizen" was the necessary  requirement for those at the time of the adoption of the Constitution. This is made very clear in the Constitutional Reckoning 2 Minute Video.


Finally, as I entertain the honor and dignity of those who have sacrificed their egos, reputations, time, talent,families, even their blood, and body parts for our National Security in the United States of America, I cannot consider if I was not 'Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents' advocating by some kind of envious, jealous, or prideful remark that constituted those upholding the opportunity for our children as doing so on the basis of racism, bigotry, or unethical standards contrary to the Supreme Law of the Land.

Our U.S. History is a Final Notice- and of our 43 U.S. Presidents thus far Chester Arthur remains along with Barack Obama the only one's characterized outside the bounds of the U.S. Constitutions requirements for the designated times of which they lived. Meaning the requirement for those serving after the Revolution was[Citizen], those after [natural born Citizen] ie. born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents.

Chester Arthur 1881-1885 never was elected as President, but he was next in line as President Garfield was assassinated.

Arthur warded off offense to his not being qualified by lying about his family origins. Recent revelations of a 2008 investigation indicate his father did not naturalize as a U.S. Citizen until Arthur was 14 years old.

Barack Obama is the only other person allowed to occupy the Office of the President without merit of the established criteria of [natural born Citizen] ie born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents. Obama's very public release of his own long form birth Certificate bears out that his father was not a U.S. Citizen at the time of Barack Obama's birth. This certainly is not a reflection of the 'Citizen' status Obama may have, but that status for the Office of the President has long since expired as Obama was not a U.S. Citizen at the time of the Adoption of the U.S. Constitution.

The threat of course to our National Security for this security breach is not simply a cover-up of Obama about his own identification, but wholly will be looked upon in the anal of history in the big picture of U.S. Debt skyrocketing 10 Trillion under Obama's watch, U.S. Healthcare skyrocketing consuming 1/5 of GDP, and of course the U.S. foreign invasion of uncommitted illegal aliens which may ultimately cost America a Civil War and many thousands even millions of lives lost.

 As my U.S. Supreme Court Case 14-9396 will be reflected upon in Historical Records and Archived, the fraud was known and the deeds such as Rep. Nancy Pelosi dictating two separate certification records one to the 49 States and one to Hawaii were just simple steps that were very evident to cover up the understood perpetuation of fraud upon the American Public. Let me go on record as saying "I told you so" is the poorest commentary of being right I could possible conceive of, and one which I do not care for.

The Future will not hold me absent its revelations of death and destruction and I shall not find one twitch of satisfaction. It was announced today that Obamacare was increasing its cost by 17 to 42 %, that's just the beginning. IT IS the job of the Future to convince most Americans of this, I have done all I could at every step of the way and pray daily that our U.S. Constitution might be upheld and that God might forgive us our trespasses and somehow, someway, make things right with the least amount of punitive action possible we have brought upon ourselves. I just cannot bring myself to think about this any other way being involved with as I have.

Thank You! May God Bless You America, forgive what so many could not have known, and focus upon those who were Responsible. May God punish the wicked and hold guiltless the innocent in remembrance of Psalms 58 and the righteous will say, "There is indeed a God that Judges the World".

Please, consider a Contribution Now by clicking the secure Paypal link. You contribution Today will help make a Better America Tomorrow!

Sincerely, 
Cody Robert Judy

THE POLITICAL ROUND TABLE DISCUSSION




Check Out Politics Podcasts at Blog Talk Radio with RCRadio on BlogTalkRadio with Reality Check on BlogTalkRadio



@RC [Thanks again Doc. Also thanks to Brian Reilly and CRJ who called. We went past the two hour streaming limit but the discussion should be in the archive version. We had a discussion with CRJ and about his case and the definition of NBC.]

It was a real pleasure to be in that Round Table Discussion agreeing to disagree.
As I thought about it this morning I appreciated you letting me come on the show. Things like that ROUND TABLE are EPIC and the Discussion Healthy.
Kevin Davidson AKA Doctor Conspiracy (episode in case you missed it)


Check Out Politics Podcasts at Blog Talk Radio with wheresobamasbirthcertificateXcom on BlogTalkRadio

Like Doc said about his experience in WOBC (wheresobamasbirthcertificate.org) there was one point I regretted not saying as we disagreed on “Precedent Case”

And that would have been to emphasize more the reality that the SCOTUS has not had a Discussion on “natural born Citizen” where it Counts – Between TWO PRESIDENTIAL Candidates.

Thus our Campaigns are regulated by Cases considering “Citizen” and not “natural born Citizen”
I do wish the SCOTUS had enough respect for the Constitution to understand the slight. (smile)

You, Doc,Brian, and myself really engaged in a conversation that should be had in the U.S. Supreme Court and broadcast on Prime Time. . if you just for one minute thought about the hundreds of millions of Votes and Billions of dollars that have gone into the ’08. ’12., and now ’16 Presidential Elections. . that’s an easy up.

If the SCOTUS could not be juiced up by THAT I’d have to say they are in the same condition as the majority of Certs that hit their desk .. D.O.A or Deadlisted.

On a side note:

You and Doc are so talented with your voices. I mean REALLY good! Your both amazingly articulate, distinct, and unique and PRIME TIME is missing out.

Doc’s Voice could sell Beef to Cows. Sam Elliot better watch out , because he could lose his dinner over that voice.

You RC really should be MC’n Bloomberg TV or some other high profile show , with your quick wit, intelligence, and all around savvy.

REALLY was my honor in the Discussion with you guys and with Brian Reilly (who worked on the CCP). . whose sincere desire to look for truth I took as genuine.

You know I thought this morning “America’s Got Great Talent”
Wouldn’t it be something if the best of the best in forensics, in Congress, in Court, in Politics, got together in Principle for the Truth?

Then I thought .., “Well, that was what the great experience and experiment the USA was all about in the first place with the Freedom and Liberty to do it. ”

You know TODAY that Round Table Discussion at Prime Time would cost millions of dollars. . and the Value would be exponentially higher.

I guess we missed the Pro Salary Cap, but it was a great Scrimmage.

2016 D- CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT






Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.
Web Site www.codyjudy.us 

Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.




Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!



Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!


Cody Robert Judy's book :





Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION
1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.


INSPIRING - I believe in You



APPLICATION FOR STAY PENDING FULL REVIEW ON THE RECUSAL OF JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT AND KAGAN FROM PROCEEDINGS














Wednesday, October 21, 2015

BREAKING REPORT: AMERICANS CONCERNED AS UNSTABLE OBAMA THREATENS U.S.A's NATIONAL SECURITY



BREAKING REPORT: 

AMERICANS CONCERNED AS UNSTABLE OBAMA THREATENS
 U.S.A's NATIONAL SECURITY

Asked a very simple question if he had any hint about Joe Biden's entry into the Presidential Race, Obama's response nearly took the wind out of the lungs in the room, "This is about climate change, guys, after all , the climate meeting was merely about 'survival of the planet." racked Obama to the Press Question.

The national security concern is that when Obama declares "survival of the planet" looms, almost as if something seen indistinctly at a distance through the fog with only 455 days left in his second term, clearly a veiled threat of great concern to the USA's national security is articulated.

The greatest concern for so many Americans is that Obama lied so much to get there. The capability and calculations haven't been what we would call benign.  It wasn't until 2011 that Obama released a long form birth certificate, which still showed he was not qualified for the Office of the President as son of a Kenyan Citizen regardless of his birth place.

April 10th a non-binding resolution was introduced into the U.S. Senate by Claire McCaskill, co-sponsored by then Sen. Obama and Sen. Clinton asserting two parents for Sen. John McCain was a good enough consideration to neutralize his Panamanian nativity of birth, and for the first time use a 'naturalization process', meaning using the Government, to dicta to determine a 'natural born Citizen' rather then the laws of nature ie. born in the Country to two citizen parents.

It was a one body legislative tool used that had far reaching implications and by the end of April that same year, or in about 20 days, it had passed. Of course it was not passed by the House, or signed by a President, but it cleared a path through the sage for legitimacy for Sen. McCain to run for President after 8 attempts since 2003 failed in Congress to change the Constitution's discipline of 'natural born Citizen' for the President and Vice President ie Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents.

The born in the U.S. had been dropped, and the two parent requirement had been kept. Of course Sen. McCain will always be a native born Panamanian. That's where it all begin for him. He will always have roots there. The Senate, saw an opening and manipulated it jeopardizing the USA's national security.

Many do not recall the reason the 'natural born Citizen' clause was implemented into the Constitution in the first place.

In a purported alma mater of  Obama's College years Columbia University, exist an essay entitled "The Papers of John Jay" under the heading John Jay and the Philadelphia Convention we read: [On 25th of July 1787 he addressed a letter to George Washington, the Convention's presiding officer, advancing that the Chief Executive should be a "natural born citizen", a suggestion to be embodied in Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the Constitution.]

Of course we do still have that letter and its contents certainly leavers little doubt as to the reason that the 'natural born Citizen' was being considered for the Office of the President , but was not being considered for the requirements of the Office of Representative or Senator. The Letter reads:

             "Permit me to hint, whether it would not be wise and seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of Foreigners into the administration of our national Government, and to declare expressly that the Command in chief of the American army shall not be given to, nor devolve on , any but a natural born Citizen.
             
The RATIONALE

St. George Tucker, an early federal judge, wrote in his 1803 edition of William Blackstone's Commentaries on the Laws of England, perhaps the leading authority for the delegates to the Constitutional Convention for the terms used in the Constitution, that the natural born citizen clause is 'a happy means of security against foreign influence" and that "[t]he admission of foreigners into our councils, consequently, cannot be too much guarded against" In Vol.II Chapter 10, Blackstone writes, "The children of aliens, born here in England, are generally speaking, natural-born subjects, and entitled to all the privileges of such." St. George Tucker, the editor, says in a footnote, naturalized citizens have the same rights as the natural-born except "they are forever incapable of being chosen to the office of the president of the United States.".

Clearly the U.S.A's concern of foreign princes has been marginalized by simple disparaging of the terms of nobility. So we must consider who is a prince to defeat even the term expressed as a nobility title. Article 1, Section 9, clause 8 of the U.S. Constitution forbids 'granting' titles of nobility. However, the greater respect of the USA's Citizenship Award, apart and contrasting the 'subject award' of England, was that all Citizens were granted the ability to serve in leadership rolls, but that Office of the President was reserved only for 'natural born citizens'. This and all of the many rights and privileges granted in the Pledge "Justice for All" clearly made all Americans in parlance, 'kings and princes in their own castles' or "queens and princesses" rather than just a ruling class or family.

The summary is its a fools errand to say that the USA has no more reason for a vigilant guard against foreign influence, because in notable terms Obama can easily be seen as a prince Saudi Arabia financed at Harvard. Questions still swirl in affirmation and denial regarding a large grant made by Saudi Arabia Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal to Harvard University about the time Obama again was purported to attend and served as President of the Harvard Law Review.

The continued assault upon America's Guard for a 'natural born Citizen' in the Office of the President as a defense against foreign influence is about the only thing that is [n]ot foreign. Eight attempts just since 2003 have been made to change it in Congress, but all were soundly defeated justifying what we would call a Legislative Mandate.

Of course those serving in the House and the Senate who are not qualified for the Office of the President would be the clearest choices to assault this guard much more readily than the People. Those have included on the Republican side of the isle in 2016 Sen. Ted Cruz, Sen. Marco Rubio, Gov. Bobby Jindal and of course in 2008 Sen. McCain. On the Democratic side of the isle Sen. Obama remains the most infamous usurper of the Constitution's 'natural born citizen' clause requirement.

A quick glance of Obama's record clearly points to an abandonment of other principles that can be laid at the feet of knocking the guard out, but I'm not going to go into it in detail. It is clear under Obama more debt has been added to the National Debt than a combination of all the other President's put together, and this certainly is telling upon the backs of America's children.  

The biggest story of that may be the one untold. He didn't do it alone, he's had a lot of help from Republicans that are seen to be riding Obama for all they are worth. They have recaptured the House, the Senate, and are poised to clearly take the Presidency. To say Obama has not been their pony to exploit would be an understatement, but is that deserving of America's vote and trust?

Not a single Mainstream Candidate for Republicans in 2008,2012, and now 2016 has yet to even object to the natural born citizenship requirement guard that has been let down in a severe breach of America's national security.

This has made great fodder for Republican Leaders like Rep. Trey Gowdy whose rip roaring speech making the rounds on the internet is a remarkably candid about 'saying one thing, and doing another". He is very upset about the "President" not executing the laws of Congress as part of his duty and oath on the one hand, but offers not a single word about the duty of Congress to execute its duty to see to it that a 'natural born Citizen' devolve upon the Office of the President.

THE HOUSE DOES NOT PASS SUGGESTIONS WE PASS LAWS


In the interest and preservation of the Guard of our U.S. Constitution's demand for a natural born Citizen, I am the only Candidate for President in America over this disaster who has continually appealed for the resolution of the breach in the wall suing McCain and Obama.

The latest Case in the U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396 has just been punitively closed citing non payment of fees, and proper submission to the Court in printing the Petition in booklet form that can run upwards of $4500 dollars and a denial of the forma pauperis standing that was asked for from the Court to continue the Case.

America has always been known for Justice for All, however this latest breach has concerned many Americans who see a failure in that standard. This has lead to my introducing CRJ Resolution  to both the Judiciary Committees of the House and the Senate alerting them of the need for a RESOLUTION that would serve to notify the COURT of this breach upon the poor as a #WarOnPoor.

Collectively we know the House and the Senate are controlled by a majority of Republicans now. If a resolution was passed which can happen within a matter of weeks, it would be a strength to Republicans to be seen concerned about the poor's plight to Justice. If Democrats objected to it, understanding it might inflict Obama, of course the object reality to the public would be seen as Democrats truly against the poor... an illuminating perspective for the voting public.

We understand how fast a non-binding RESOLUTION can be passed and mailed to the U.S. Supreme Court demanding either an investigation or a flat out demand the case be heard. Every Citizen has been encouraged in an effort to get this on board with their Republican and Democrat Senators and Representatives hopefully with the understanding that a NON-BINDING RESOLUTION , just like U.S. Senate Res. 511 can pass very easily in as little as twenty (20) days.

We hope that you will take notice of this and read the following proposal and forward it to your Elected Leaders who are suppose to serve you in the Federal Government positions of U.S. Senator and U.S. Representative.

Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy
2016 D. President Candidate for President.

IN THE 114TH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION IN THE YEAR OF OUR LORD 2015
U.S. House of Representatives
U.S. Senate
CRJ WAR ON THE POOR RESOLUTION
RESOLUTION 
Indictment of IMPEACHMENT for Bad Behavior on ALL CURRENT SERVING U.S. Supreme Court Justice(s) for WAR ON THE POOR ACTION prohibiting the Poor from seeking Justice in the U.S. Supreme Court
WHEREAS : It is the U.S. Federal Law that [Justice For All] shall not be Prohibited from any United States Citizen on account of forma pauperis standing or condition of Poverty
WHEREAS: The Petitioner in the Case was not sanctioned OR dismissed by U.S. SUPREME COURT RULES 39.8
WHEREAS: TWO LOWER Court's of Law in the Federal District Court (Utah Division) and Federal Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals have undertaken Proceedings GRANTING Cody Robert Judy (CRJ) a 2008,'12, and 2016 Candidate for the Office of President Forma Pauperis Standing in the Calendar Year JULY 2014-15
WHEREAS: Federal Statute honors a GRANTED Forma Pauperis Standing for a Calendar YEAR
WHEREAS: TWO WITNESSES of the Judicial Branch have on the Federal Court Record GRANTED CRJ access to JUSTICE of their Court(s), but the U.S. Supreme Court has Denied Access to JUSTICE from it's Bench in the same Calendar Year by a single Justice Sotomayor and upon [REVIEW] the FULL or entire U.S. SUPREME COURT BENCH, and has Denied ACCESS to [Justice] in the U.S. Supreme Court solely on the conditions of Poverty PUNITIVELY upon CRJ in CASE 14-9396 on account of his Poverty as the Docket indicates , a WAR ON THE POOR is Noticed and has been Noticeably declared by the U.S. Supreme Court Justices.
WHEREAS: ANY U.S. Citizen is considered Equal under the Supreme Law of the Land in and under the benevolence of The U.S. Constitution formed by the Union of the 50 individual State(s) forming the United States as the Body of We The People, a WAR ON THE POOR of one is considered a WAR ON THE POOR of all.
WHEREAS: U.S.C. ARTICLE III Sect.I provides Judicial Powers vested in the U.S. Supreme Court and in inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish.
WHEREAS: U.S.C ARTICLE III Sect. 1 states: The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during [good Behaviour] and Sect 2 states: Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States to all cases affecting [Citizens] thereof.
WHEREAS: Denial of ACCESS to any Federal Court established under the U.S. Constitution solely on the basis of Poverty can only be contrived as the WORST POSSIBLE CASE of JUSTICE in the United States of America under the banner and [Pledge of Allegiance] in JUSTICE For All constituting BAD BEHAVIOUR
BE IT RESOLVED
That this BODY OF LEGISLATURE [U.S. House of Representatives] and [U.S. Senate] in their JUDICIAL COMMITTEES SHALL take the TWO Inferior Courts of Law as Witnesses, as well CRJ as a Third Witness, and SHALL RESOLVE to undertake IMMEDIATE IMPEACHMENT Proceedings against those so named individual Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court constituting the FULL REVIEW for Bad Behaviour upon the U.S. Constitution and Justice for All.
END
AGAIN YOUR HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT:
It is the Duty of the Individual Citizens of every Particular State to Forward this to their ELECTED LEADERS as that is Who they were elected to Serve and more often then not the Elected Officials in your State will not take a Resolution Proposition from someone of a different State. Its usually very easily E-Mailed if you Google your State U.S Representative and U.S. Senator. DO IT TODAY!

U.S. HOUSE JUDICIARY- Subcommittee-Constitution and Civil Justice 

REP. TRENT FRANKS CHAIR
V.C Rep. Ron DeSantis
Members: REP. King, REP. Gohmert, REP. Cohen., REP. Nadler, REP. Deutch

U.S SENATE JUDICIARY Committee- Subcommittee on Constitution
 SENATOR CORNYN - CHAIR
R.M Sen. Durbin
Members:
Sen. Tillis
Sen. Graham
Sen. Whitehouse
Sen. Coons
Sen. Cruz
Sen. Franken
Sen. Vitter

OPINION 
Of course I would not ask anyone to do anything that I wouldn't do, so I include my information here that let my own Utah U.S. Senator Hatch and U.S. Senator Lee as well as my U.S. Representative Rob Bishop 1st Congressional District of Utah know about this injustice that needs to be remedied.


 It is very difficult for me to understand why any Senator or U.S. Representative would be against treating the poor equally and who would not see this as a matter of very important consideration. 

Just a few questions I have received so far in introducing this: 
Q. Would removing the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court undue their decisions on marriage equality? 

There might be a reasonable argument for challenging any opinion that has been brought down by a Court whose Justices are impeached' for 'bad behavior ", but I wouldn't count on it.

Q. The Court has granted several 'forma pauperis' petitioners, doesn't this fact place your proposed legislation in jeopardy of not holding water? 

Of course there have been cases this Court has granted Forma Pauperis standing on. The fact is emphasized  in not granting mine, when two Courts below did,(as well as the U.S. Supreme Court themselves in 2012, and my Motion for Forma Pauperis standing was not dismissed on any basis of [abusive filings] as the U.S. Supreme Court has indicated for some Cases under Rule 39.8), and has placed my case in an even more grievous circumstances of what we would refer to as 'selective dismissals' on the issues. Its a very dangerous road to go down when that becomes the 'norm'. Its become very pervasive in Obama's dictatorial ways of governing understood as  'prosecutorial discretion'. 

Q. Isn't this kind of a light case to be considered as a 'bad behavioral' charge worth 'impeachment' proceedings by Congress on the U.S. Supreme Court Justices?

I suppose if your rich you might feel that way, but I see it as a very big STOP SIGN and one that I'm sure hasn't just happened with me. 

Q. Does pushing this legislation do anything for the Case Considerations of Obama's Ineligibility?

No, it doesn't. That is certainly why both Democrats and Republicans should not feel any hesitancy whatsoever in passing Resolutions to began IMPEACHMENT of the Justices for this action. This is really a separate matter and strictly involves removing the 'WAR ON THE POOR" in the punitive actions of not allowing access to the Courts Granting Certs and I think will have far reaching affects that even U.S. Justices are not above the law and that the day they decide that equality and justice under our U.S. Constitution is not a good idea, that's the day they need to consider the Life Tenure for good behavior just came to an End. 

Q. Can the Court Change its Ruling on your Case to avoid impeachment proceedings?

Well, I am not a Justice, but as Justice goes there might be some considerations made for "clerical errors". That is why through the Proceedings of Impeachment Congress can summon the Supreme Court Justices to their Bench and find out exactly who knew what and when. This is just the process we have to go through.



" I say to Americans that if you are going to find Justice for All, and find your U.S. Constitutional Civil Rights in tact, that you had better start looking just a little deeper into the action instead of the words of your favorite Presidential Candidate.

"Wither a "clerical error" or some other error the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in Case No. 14-9396 needs to be changed. Mistakes in the Court happen I understand, but correction demands action over words also.  "  

Thank You! 
Please, consider a Contribution Now by clicking the secure Paypal link. You contribution Today will help make a Better America Tomorrow!

Sincerely, 
Cody Robert Judy

2016 D- CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT






Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.
Web Site www.codyjudy.us 

Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.




Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!



Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!


Cody Robert Judy's book :





Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION
1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.


INSPIRING - I believe in You



APPLICATION FOR STAY PENDING FULL REVIEW ON THE RECUSAL OF JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT AND KAGAN FROM PROCEEDINGS















Monday, October 19, 2015

BREAKING REPORT: WAR ON THE POOR EXPLODES IN CONGRESS- PRES. CANDIDATE SEEKS INDICTMENTS ON THE U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES

BREAKING REPORT:

 WAR ON THE POOR EXPLODES IN CONGRESS

  PRES. CANDIDATE SEEKS INDICTMENTS ON THE U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES

BREAKING NEWS: WAR ON THE POOR
RESOLUTION INDICTMENTS SOUGHT BY 2016 U.S. PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE on ALL U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES!!!
2016 U.S. Presidential Candidate Cody Robert Judy is asking both the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate to pass RESOLUTIONS in their respective bodies that would indict all of the U.S. Supreme Court Justices in affect for what he pleads is effectively the worst case scenario on Justice For All - A WAR ON THE POOR.
The following RESOLUTION is being asked to be circulated by every Citizen upon his/her Representative and Senator as the General Public of CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES to every U.S. Senator and U.S. Representative in Congress for the Individual States.
It is the Duty of the Individual Citizens of every Particular State to Forward this to their ELECTED LEADERS as that is Who they were elected to Serve and more often then not the Elected Officials in your State will not take a Resolution Proposition from someone of a different State. Its usually very easy E-Mailed if you Google your State U.S Representative and U.S. Senator.
Please Submit the following RESOLUTION to the  HOUSE Judiciary Committee- Constitution and Civil Courts Subcommittee as well as the SENATE Judiciary Committee - Subcommittee- Constitution



IN THE 114TH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION IN THE YEAR OF OUR LORD 2015
U.S. House of Representatives
U.S. Senate
CRJ WAR ON THE POOR RESOLUTION
RESOLUTION 
Indictment of IMPEACHMENT for Bad Behavior on ALL CURRENT SERVING U.S. Supreme Court Justice(s) for WAR ON THE POOR ACTION prohibiting the Poor from seeking Justice in the U.S. Supreme Court
WHEREAS : It is the U.S. Federal Law that [Justice For All] shall not be Prohibited from any United States Citizen on account of forma pauperis standing or condition of Poverty
WHEREAS: The Petitioner in the Case was not sanctioned OR dismissed by U.S. SUPREME COURT RULES 39.8
WHEREAS: TWO LOWER Court's of Law in the Federal District Court (Utah Division) and Federal Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals have undertaken Proceedings GRANTING Cody Robert Judy (CRJ) a 2008,'12, and 2016 Candidate for the Office of President Forma Pauperis Standing in the Calendar Year JULY 2014-15
WHEREAS: Federal Statute honors a GRANTED Forma Pauperis Standing for a Calendar YEAR
WHEREAS: TWO WITNESSES of the Judicial Branch have on the Federal Court Record GRANTED CRJ access to JUSTICE of their Court(s), but the U.S. Supreme Court has Denied Access to JUSTICE from it's Bench in the same Calendar Year by a single Justice Sotomayor and upon [REVIEW] the FULL or entire U.S. SUPREME COURT BENCH, and has Denied ACCESS to [Justice] in the U.S. Supreme Court solely on the conditions of Poverty PUNITIVELY upon CRJ in CASE 14-9396 on account of his Poverty as the Docket indicates , a WAR ON THE POOR is Noticed and has been Noticeably declared by the U.S. Supreme Court Justices.
WHEREAS: ANY U.S. Citizen is considered Equal under the Supreme Law of the Land in and under the benevolence of The U.S. Constitution formed by the Union of the 50 individual State(s) forming the United States as the Body of We The People, a WAR ON THE POOR of one is considered a WAR ON THE POOR of all.
WHEREAS: U.S.C. ARTICLE III Sect.I provides Judicial Powers vested in the U.S. Supreme Court and in inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish.
WHEREAS: U.S.C ARTICLE III Sect. 1 states: The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during [good Behaviour] and Sect 2 states: Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States to all cases affecting [Citizens] thereof.
WHEREAS: Denial of ACCESS to any Federal Court established under the U.S. Constitution solely on the basis of Poverty can only be contrived as the WORST POSSIBLE CASE of JUSTICE in the United States of America under the banner and [Pledge of Allegiance] in JUSTICE For All constituting BAD BEHAVIOUR
BE IT RESOLVED
That this BODY OF LEGISLATURE [U.S. House of Representatives] and [U.S. Senate] in their JUDICIAL COMMITTEES SHALL take the TWO Inferior Courts of Law as Witnesses, as well CRJ as a Third Witness, and SHALL RESOLVE to undertake IMMEDIATE IMPEACHMENT Proceedings against those so named individual Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court constituting the FULL REVIEW for Bad Behaviour upon the U.S. Constitution and Justice for All.
END
AGAIN YOUR HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT:
It is the Duty of the Individual Citizens of every Particular State to Forward this to their ELECTED LEADERS as that is Who they were elected to Serve and more often then not the Elected Officials in your State will not take a Resolution Proposition from someone of a different State. Its usually very easily E-Mailed if you Google your State U.S Representative and U.S. Senator. DO IT TODAY!

U.S. HOUSE JUDICIARY- Subcommittee-Constitution and Civil Justice 
REP. TRENT FRANKS CHAIR
V.C Rep. Ron DeSantis
Members: REP. King, REP. Gohmert, REP. Cohen., REP. Nadler, REP. Deutch

U.S SENATE JUDICIARY Committee- Subcommittee on Constitution
 SENATOR CORNYN - CHAIR
R.M Sen. Durbin
Members:
Sen. Tillis
Sen. Graham
Sen. Whitehouse
Sen. Coons
Sen. Cruz
Sen. Franken
Sen. Vitter

OPINION 
Of course I would not ask anyone to do anything that I wouldn't do, so I include my information here that let my own Utah U.S. Senator Hatch and U.S. Senator Lee as well as my U.S. Representative Rob Bishop 1st Congressional District of Utah know about this injustice that needs to be remedied.


 It is very difficult for me to understand why any Senator or U.S. Representative would be against treating the poor equally and who would not see this as a matter of very important consideration. 

Just a few questions I have received so far in introducing this: 
Q. Would removing the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court undue their decisions on marriage equality? 

There might be a reasonable argument for challenging any opinion that has been brought down by a Court whose Justices are impeached' for 'bad behavior ", but I wouldn't count on it.

Q. The Court has granted several 'forma pauperis' petitioners, doesn't this fact place your proposed legislation in jeopardy of not holding water? 

Of course there have been cases this Court has granted Forma Pauperis standing on. The fact is emphasized  in not granting mine, when two Courts below did,(as well as the U.S. Supreme Court themselves in 2012, and my Motion for Forma Pauperis standing was not dismissed on any basis of [abusive filings] as the U.S. Supreme Court has indicated for some Cases under Rule 39.8), and has placed my case in an even more grievous circumstances of what we would refer to as 'selective dismissals' on the issues. Its a very dangerous road to go down when that becomes the 'norm'. Its become very pervasive in Obama's dictatorial ways of governing understood as  'prosecutorial discretion'. 

Q. Isn't this kind of a light case to be considered as a 'bad behavioral' charge worth 'impeachment' proceedings by Congress on the U.S. Supreme Court Justices?

I suppose if your rich you might feel that way, but I see it as a very big STOP SIGN and one that I'm sure hasn't just happened with me. 

Q. Does pushing this legislation do anything for the Case Considerations of Obama's Ineligibility?

No, it doesn't. That is certainly why both Democrats and Republicans should not feel any hesitancy whatsoever in passing Resolutions to began IMPEACHMENT of the Justices for this action. This is really a separate matter and strictly involves removing the 'WAR ON THE POOR" in the punitive actions of not allowing access to the Courts Granting Certs and I think will have far reaching affects that even U.S. Justices are not above the law and that the day they decide that equality and justice under our U.S. Constitution is not a good idea, that's the day they need to consider the Life Tenure for good behavior just came to an End. 

Q. Can the Court Change its Ruling on your Case to avoid impeachment proceedings?

Well, I am not a Justice, but as Justice goes there might be some considerations made for "clerical errors". That is why through the Proceedings of Impeachment Congress can summon the Supreme Court Justices to their Bench and find out exactly who knew what and when. This is just the process we have to go through.



" I say to Americans that if you are going to find Justice for All, and find your U.S. Constitutional Civil Rights in tact, that you had better start looking just a little deeper into the action instead of the words of your favorite Presidential Candidate.

"Wither a "clerical error" or some other error the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in Case No. 14-9396 needs to be changed. Mistakes in the Court happen I understand, but correction demands action over words also.  "  

Thank You! 
Please, consider a Contribution Now by clicking the secure Paypal link. You contribution Today will help make a Better America Tomorrow!

Sincerely, 
Cody Robert Judy

2016 D- CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT






Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.
Web Site www.codyjudy.us 

Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.




Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!



Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!


Cody Robert Judy's book :





Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION
1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.


INSPIRING - I believe in You



APPLICATION FOR STAY PENDING FULL REVIEW ON THE RECUSAL OF JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT AND KAGAN FROM PROCEEDINGS