Tuesday, September 25, 2012




According to a phone call I received today, from a source I cannot disclose but to say it was credible, my case in the United States Supreme Court JUDY v. OBAMA Case No. 12-5276 was delayed. My case was divided into four parts by the Analyst because of its length, and with the load the Court received it was determined would be delayed.

My case was indeed lengthy, 79 pages, pressing the legal limit which in no way, shape or form is recommended and was supplemented with another 3 pages Emergency Application.
In reference to the Court new statute as it pertains to this- ' Miscellaneous orders may be issued in individual cases at any time. Scheduled Order List will continue to be posted on the Court's web site (http://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/orders.aspx) immediately following their release by the Court. Miscellaneous orders will continue to be posted on the Website the day of issuance or the next day in the instance of some emergency applications. The change in practice will go into effect on Tuesday, September 25th, 2012.' 'Otherwise, all orders coming out of that Conference will be released next Monday at 9:30am. '

The courtesy call from the anonymous source seemed to be directed at the 'fall out' that would also be determined publically which I thought was a comment about it being blogged, twittered, and publically scrutinized. I suppose this could be perceived to be more on the part of violence that might be attributed to Birther outrage, then of the celebratory nature of the denial Obama supporters might have.

According to a new procedure which is just this Session being implemented that I commented upon in a previous blog, was directed for this exact circumstance, workload for the Court and length of the petition.

I was actually very impressed with this because of the understanding that my petition was in fact being dissected piece by piece by the Court and wasn't summarily being trashed dead on arrival.

Many people have pinned the United States Supreme Court Justices down regarding 'cases to be watched' or those with 'more merit' based on the Court's recommendation that the Respondent actually file a response, however this case does not represent the norm of cases filed with the Court because of the deadline factor of the General Election, which most cases do not have.

I shall also note here that a rather unprecedented thing happened I think causing a little consternation with this particular case. The very unprecedented and unusual factor is that in this case Obama and his Counsel basically snubbed the Court in which Judge Malihi denied a Motion to Quash and almost simultaneously acted in Obama's best defense.

In most cases this would have led to a grant of contempt or default against Obama, but in this case Judge Malihi reached outside the Court for a decision and acted as Obama's best defense allowing Obama's contempt in not showing up to Court, clearly providing a flood of catastrophe for not only justice, but the illusion of justice so far away from jurisprudence. The theory of Justice would be to have a Judge deciding against two arguments. In this case, Obama or his Counsel refused to attend but were favored, clearly making the Judge Obama's best defense.

The new statute for releasing the status for cases 'delayed' or 'dismissed' is for the following Monday, so again we are put in the ship of possibility.

Cody Robert Judy

1-79 page Petition for Cert: http://www.scribd.com/doc/100156244/Judy-v-Obama-Petition-for-Writ-of-Certiorari-Revision-per-U-S-Clerk-Case-Analyst-Appendix-Stamped-Orders-Included


3-Previously referenced Blog : http://codyjudy.blogspot.com/2012/09/new-update-on-scotus-24th-conference.html

Resigned Judy v. Obama 12-5276 Receives No "Grant" From SCOTUS

Resigned Judy v. Obama 12-5276 Receives No "Grant" From SCOTUS Sept 25th,2012.

Through the SCOTUS Blot this morning we learned that there were 6 new 'grants' from the Conference held Sept 24th, 2012 of which we were apart.

Unfortunately, Judy v. Obama was not a part of the 6 that were granted, leading for the sad resignation of our petition to the United States Supreme Court.


Here, in summary, are the issues the Court agreed to hear in the five cases (other than Millbrook):

Gabelli — calculation of the five-year limitation on the SEC’s power to impose a penalty for securities fraud.

Levin — scope of legal immunity of military medical personnel for an alleged “battery” while providing medical care to a civilian.

McNeely – police authority to take a blood sample from a driver who allegedly was drunk, when the officer has no warrant but wants to act quickly because of the chemical fact that alcohol in the blood dissipates over time.

Maracich — lawyer’s legal right to obtain personal information from driver’s license records, when the attorneys plan to use it in lawsuits and federal law supposedly insulates such information from disclosure.

Delia — state power to recover funds spent on providing medical care to the poor or disabled under the federal Medicaid law, when the patient has received funds from another source.

Whither by refusing to get involved with the definition of 'natural born citizen', or a new precedent that the Court has embraced as far as allowing 'Constitutional Construction" from the bench without the necessary 2/3'rd vote of Congress necessary to change the qualifications determined in the Constitution for the office of the President, the Court by its refusal to hear has determined a few things:

1) No amount of financial damage done to a candidate by a competitor who is running a political race under different rules of qualification in the same party warrants justice from the court.

Cody said today, " Our Campaign has been constitutionally run over by The United States Supreme Court today in the deference of our petition to them. The sadness that is in my heart is not due to any loss to me personally, which is not insignificant by any means of the facts, but my sadness is really based upon the blow suffered to our United States Constitution."

"Of course it can be said that our United States Government has departed from the United States Constitution's principles and pillars of soundness quite some time ago, in many other ways, however the direct assault upon the principles of construction so plain and precious as the qualifications of the office of the President, which had beforehand been upheld by precedent of the United States Supreme Court, portend a line of malice which has not until now been known by the Justices of the Court, and upon hope itself."

"The procession of the Constitution so many have given their lives for can begin, though I have not seen the final resting place, and my failure to defend this precious key-stone successfully is of the most bitter regret for my own inadequacies in word and knowledge to convince my fellow Americans in the seats of the United States Supreme Court of the importance."

"I resign my petition to God, for I know in his hands the future of the Union is continued, and I myself am of no or little consequence to that promise which is great."

We at the campaign share Cody's words as our own, and share our own thoughts of the great determination and courage Cody has in fact demonstrated for our Constitution in this campaign.

No further updates at this time.

The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign

Cody Release the following song 5 days ago indicative of his love for America:
Love You Lots - A Cody Robert Judy Original

And this one 2 days ago
Feeln,Breathn,Dreamn You Again - A Cody Robert Judy Original

Monday, September 24, 2012

New Update on SCOTUS 24th Conference Judy v. Obama 12-5276

The interest in this is to be applauded, and I thank you for tuning in. Its a really wonderful thing when Americans start tuning in to what the United States Supreme Court is doing, and the interest generated specifically in this case has been terrific.

Our campaign is posting the following information for the benefit of those interested. We hope these links and the information is helpful, and that you have a great night and continue to tune in!

The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Camp.


[ Change in orders release (UPDATED)
UPDATE 12:45 pm. The new early release procedure will be followed on all days when a regular Order List is due to be released, and not just on days when the Court will be sitting. With that policy going into effect tomorrow, presumably that means that, if there are grants out of today’s Conference, they will be made available at 9:30 am Tuesday. Otherwise, all orders coming out of that Conference will be released next Monday at 9:30 am.


In the Supreme Court’s new Term, soon to open, the Justices will follow a new routine in the release of orders when the Court is sitting. On those days, the list of orders will be made public at 9:30 a.m., rather than 10 a.m., the custom for many years. The Court announced the change in a news release Monday morning; it can be read here.

The Court explained the switch by saying that, on days when the Justices take to the bench, the release of the orders a half-hour earlier will give the public, the press, and attorneys more chance to review the Court’s actions before the public sitting begins.

The change will take effect tomorrow morning.

The Court’s Term formally begins next Monday, when oral arguments resume. The Court is meeting in a private Conference this morning to decide which new cases, if any, will be granted for review in the new Term. The Court has released its calendars for oral argument for the October, November, and December sittings. ]

For Immediate Release For Further Information Contact:
September 24, 2012 Kathleen L. Arberg 202-479-3211

Beginning with October Term 2012, the regularly scheduled Order Lists of the Supreme Court of the United States will be released by the Court at 9:30 a.m. rather than at 10 a.m. as had been the previous practice. On days when the Court is in session, the change will provide members of the Supreme Court Bar, the public, and the media an opportunity to review Order Lists before the Court sits at 10 a.m.

Regularly scheduled Order Lists are typically issued on each Monday that the Court sits. On occasion, regularly scheduled Order Lists are issued on days that the Court is not sitting. The issuance of such a list is announced in advance. Miscellaneous orders may be issued in individual cases at any time. Scheduled Order Lists will continue to be posted on the Court’s Website (http://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/orders.aspx) immediately following their release by the Court. Miscellaneous orders will continue to be posted on the Website the day of issuance or the next day in the instance of some emergency applications.

The change in practice will go into effect on Tuesday, September 25, 2012.

This week at the Court
On Monday, the Court meets for the “Long Conference” to consider petitions on the summer lists. Our list of “Petitions to watch” for that Conference is available in three installments (here, here, and here). We expect the Court to issue grants from its Conference on Tuesday morning and will report on those grants and any other actions by the Court as soon as possible.

Sunday, September 23, 2012

Big Day-Sept 24th Judy v. Obama SCOTUS 12-5276 Conf. Set The Prisoners Free!

Big Day tomorrow, Monday Sept 24th, Judy v. Obama 12-5276 will be in Conference in the United States Supreme Court. My case mentioned to keep your eye on? NO. Please take a look at what's more important then our National Security Breach in Obama's eligibility. Ready 4 Media Meltdown if we somehow scored? Yes! ;)


Well its make or break day tomorrow in the United States Supreme Court. I'm flooded with patriotic memories of the enormous amount of work that it even takes to get there.

Today my mind has constantly drifted towards those who have given some, and more especially to some who gave all, that our Constitution might stand.

If the United States Supreme Court refuses to hear my case, they are essentially declaring all prisoners that are ward of the States and Federal Government on 'fraud' or 'forgery' charges/sentences free as they let Obama go, they must also let the prisoners go in the order of Justice for all.

Of course Mrs. Obama knows all about that as she advocated it was proper for all of us to follow the same rules. I don't know how many prisoners that covers but they basically should have their sentences computed based on this part of my petitioner:


Page ii
3- Question - Does evidence provided to the Court by Petitioner of a Sheriff Law Enforcement Report constituting probable cause of fraud and forgery of Candidate Barack Obama’s identity papers for qualification of the Office of President casting reasonable doubt on candidate’s qualifications, if avoided by the Court, not constitute reprisal grounds for the release and pardon of all convicted of similar crimes for equal Justice under the law?

So, everyone should pass this around, and especially get to friends and family who are under such sentences and their attorneys, for we wouldn't want "justice" for all not to prevail in the United States of America, now would we?

I certainly want to thank each and every person who has contributed to the campaign and helped in one way or another to get here. We have done our part in petitioning to the highest court the grievous acts committed in We The People's oval office.

It is my prayer that the highest integrity can and will be maintained in our Government that through our example hope may spring in the hearts of the down trodden and through justice that hope will live in every American's heart both young and old.

God bless America.


Cody Robert Judy
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign