Friday, September 23, 2011

Dick Morris Thanks and Your Counsel

Dick Morris author: "Revolt!: How to defeat Obama and his Socialist Policies:


Dear Mr. Dick Morris:

A friend of mine thought it would be prudent of me to seek your counsel, and from what I've seen I think she's right. Wither you felt I was worth it might be a different story? What caught my attention was your openness of commentary in both the republican and democrat parties, which I thought was pretty smart, when I read "Obama may pull out".

In reading that, I wondered if you even knew about my candidacy for President in the Democrat Party formally announced Aug 25th,2011 with the FEC, which has been covered nationally here by the The Post&Email, and which is raising a lot of concern with the State Democrat Parties such as Iowa's Caucus, as I announce to them my opposition of an Obama coronation declaring my full intention of challenging Obama in a Democrat primary and extensively challenging Obama's eligibility to be President with the professional research that has been done by document experts now showing his long form birth certificate to be a forgery and pieced together. The response from disillusioned Democrats has been moving.

It goes without saying that this brought up in a Democrat Primary or the Caucuses, could embarrass the Party so bad and put some fuel rods in the Republican armor for a General Election that Obama's charismatic words could never recover from . Of assurity, my unique status in bringing this up within the Democrat party is interestingly anchored in spotlighting McCain's own ineligibility I took into the Nevada Court prior to the National Republican Convention as an Independent Candidate in 2008. From this position, Democrats have an easier feeling of calling me true to the Constitution for including McCain as the beginning. That beginning is with broad strokes covered in this recent blog entry "Presidential Candidates 2012 One Question? How Could the Elect be Deceived?"

Of course if Obama does not run, or for any reason chose to bow out, the issue would presumably die into the history books, and Obama might take a place in history as an eligible candidate, who no one could take down fast enough to erase his pre conceived legitmatacy, which sets a disastorious un-constitutional precedent.

The relevancy of Obama's legitimacy as an unqualified candidate, rest at the foundation of all that is important to American's today; our national security may be compromised, our treasury unnecessarily spent, our borders compromised with a Saudi Arabia funded implant setup to divide America and then to destroy Israel. How important was it to stand up for the Constitution Republican Candidates of the 2012 class with those very real political points?

They, the Republicans, missed this one. They certainly would no more like that hung around their necks then they would like the tag of missing 115,000 Russians marching into Afghanistan in 1979 would they? It speaks of a disaster being missed, like Katrina, on their watch.

So I wonder from your commentary place of wisdom wither you know about this up-coming turmoil within the Democrat party and wither your editorial reflected the desire for Republicans to face someone like Hillary Clinton in the Democrat party rather then someone like me? I presume now if you didn't, you now do.

It is a very interesting political season, and wither you care to comment, please let me say I really did enjoy your commentary on the 2012 GOP debate last night, and thought you were spot on. I certainly hope Mitt Romney becomes the Republican nominee because I've got a stack of ignored emails to him asking for his help to clean up the GOP's support of McCain painting the GOP into the corner from which the 2012 Candidates find themselves muted now on the eligibility issue by their own vote.

I would be very interested to hear from you and what you thought of this with your counsel for my campaign, and certainly will take no offense to your silence. My thought was if you should be compelled to offer any advice from the vocals of your heart in the sincere love you have for America and the Constitution, that is the binding tie between 50 States in America, I would always be appreciative.

Cody Robert Judy
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
YouTube 125 Videos: CODE4PRES

Wednesday, September 21, 2011

2012 Presidential Candidates- One Question Only? How Could the Very Elect be Decieved?

2012 Presidential Candidates- One Question Only?
How Could The Very Elect Be Deceived?

The following article has appeared over and over in conservative circles and blogs and to the authors credit much can be said about the poignant truth it points to. However, isn't it fundamentally true also that the authors of articles such as this have some kind of cohesive bond with the points they represent? If it isn't true, then we can assume they are simply writing for writings sake and do not fully believe they're own words.

"2012 Presidential Candidates - One Question Only" seen in its entirety on this link. JB Williams
(Sep. 20, 2011)

— As the 2012 election cycle heats up, the most pressing issue facing our nation today is the reinstatement of the U.S. Constitution as the Law of this Land, and the survival of our constitutional republic, complete with sovereign borders, the rule of law, states rights and a republican form of government guaranteed every citizen by the Constitution. There is no more pressing issue in America today…

As reinstating the U.S. Constitution is the highest priority of the 2012 election, and the fact that reinstating Article II requirements for the office of president is first and foremost in the effort to reinstate the constitution as the supreme law of this land, all presidential candidates must face the most vital question of the day.
Before being entrusted with the most powerful political office in our land and the world for that matter, I have only ONE question for every candidate seeking the office of President of the United States.

Based upon the mountain of evidence available which has proven beyond any reasonable doubt that Barack Hussein Obama II is not a Natural Born Citizen of the United States, and is therefore, ineligible for the office of President according to Article II – Section 1 – Clause V which clearly states – “No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President;”- and as a candidate with legal standing to challenge the legitimacy of any fellow candidate, will you challenge Barack Hussein Obama’s right to even appear on the 2012 ballot?

Every candidate for the office of president has the legal standing to challenge Barack Obama’s constitutional eligibility for the office he is seeking re-election to in 2012.

The fact that Democrats were able to trick Americans into voting for an totally ineligible candidate in 2008 has no bearing on the fact that the greatest fraud ever perpetrated on American voters cannot be allowed to continue.

CRJ Inserted Comment:
Wait just a minute; Here we go with the bait and switch. According to JB a natural born citizen has parents who are citizens and are born in the United States. John McCain has repeatedly been given a pass by JB Williams even though McCain was born outside the United States in the foreign nation of Panama. How can you have it both ways JB, prosecuting Obama but not McCain and standing up for all the Republicans whose vote was lost on an unqualified candidate as well as Democrats? JB makes every apology for McCain given his parents were serving in the military and our Constitutions Founders would have excused him too?

Our Founders knew very well about military wars in foreign lands, yet their only exception was also placed into the Constitution as "or a Citizen of the United States at the time of the adoption of this Constitution" which was the grandfather clause for the Founders themselves.

Its a well known fact, McCain orchestrated the non binding U.S. Sen. Res 511 which declared him a 'natural born citizen' in 2008 before Obama was made a nominee of the Democrat party, so how was this a trick of the Democrat party JB?

I'm a natural born citizen JB and I didn't need Congress to tell me so but McCain actually has repeatedly been told by Congress he was naturalized. Yes,.. it was in1937 that Congress passed an Act making children born prior in the Panama Canal Zone citizens. McCain was born in 1936 11 months to early and 100 yards too short as you might say.

This is the 'naturalization' process McCain fell under. He was not born in a military hospital. McCain's forthrightness to make his documents available in 2008 doesn't make it any more legitimate constitutionally speaking. That’s like saying the robber of the bank Voters Credit Union should be let go because he told them he was going to rob the bank ( McCain) instead of not telling them (Obama).

Of course my own law suit against McCain and the RNC before he was made the nominee by the Republican Party was filed and served in plenty of time, so we could say with JB's logic, that this was the 'trick' used to cover for McCain in order to make him the R nominee, because no one breathed a word about the law suit at the Republican National Convention and all the leaders new about it... even Mitt Romney.

My post here isn't to try to place blame on either R's or D's, but to accept reasonably the Constitutional Error by both parties towards the American People, who expect them to preserve and protect the Constitution but many in The Birther Movement refuse this truth. My law suit was not ruled upon until after the election was over and all the votes had been wasted on candidates who were not qualified. Indeed we can hardly expect a Fed. District Crt. Judge to rule upon or against the American People entirely, but we could hope that if they had been deceived about their candidates that to protect our elections we could have found one judge to put a stop to it, but we didn't, even though complaints were filed in time by a candidate in the race.

Indeed prophetically, we must ask how Matt 24:24 ' the very elect might be deceived? ' could possibly happen in our modern day world. Obama was in the White House and I as the only candidate in the 2008 election to sue both McCain and Obama that could withstand the 'racism' charge leveled by the media against anyone daring to charge Obama was ignored and was not supported even by Birthers.

Flash Forward to 2012 do we see any Republican Candidates standing up against Obama's Eligibility? No not one who had anything to do with the 2008 Elections or judicially challenged McCain or Obama. Do you think we know why? Well if you want BIG you have got to recall Donald Trump and the Long Form Birth Certificate uncovering, he claimed to unearth, as a service to all of us, but at what price? Bob Schieffer, Whoopi Goldberg on the View, all tagged him a Racist. Do you not think that every Republican Candidate was watching that ‘racist tag’ placed on Donald Trump especially when the polls showed huge support for him as a candidate and Trump leading the race he was only considering?

The very real truth was Republican Candidates got the message very clearly. You challenge Obama on eligibility and we (the media) have a very good claim of racist charges against you and is that really so hard to see when you remember McCain in that equation? Remember those charges are not thrown about lightly and there isn't a Republican Candidate who could stand up against them either, no candidate could. The evidence supports those who gave McCain a 'pass' quietly painted themselves into a corner of the room and couldn't get out no matter how big the gorilla in the room was, they lost their political might.

Further down JB Williams writes:
"The people responsible for the 2008 fraudulent election of Barack Hussein Obama II must be brought to justice. Every 2012 candidate is in a position of legal standing to end the charade."

Let me say I couldn't agree more, and you would think that having said this JB Williams might have written a word about my candidacy doing exactly that, not only as a crow bar against Republican Candidates muted silence, but for the principle of the matter in great excitement but it’s clear he only wrote that to try and strong arm the 2012 candidates who are silent rather then support one who isn’t.

Please don't forget JB that Mitt Romney was a candidate in 2008 and falls under that justice you’re talking about. Jon Huntsman was working as Obama's Ambassador in China and had money and power to bring it to the front. Ron Paul was a candidate and as well as Michele Bachmann was a Congressmen in 2010 when the House became Republican, but not one single jot or title towards "Qualification hearings of the ineligible Obama", even with his own release of a forged document, and disqualifying revelation of his foreign father. Congressmen Paul called Obama’s eligibility a ‘distraction’. Did I miss anyone, The maybe of Sarah Palin; was McCain's Vice President choice, she couldn't bring it could she?

Well, if principle was made over party, one might see she very well could have, and didn't. Is it any surprise to anyone Marco Rubio, also having a foreign born father naturalized when Marco was approximate 4 years old is seriously being courted by the GOP as an access door to the Latino Vote again away from principle?

Again in the Bible Matt 24:24 For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect. I've been thinking about this and its hard not to see that those people we 'elect' are indeed 'shepherds' of our Constitution swearing with an oath to preserve and protect it. How could the elect be deceived? The shepherds let down their guard? What if the shepherds were the elect?

So many have placed the emphasis on deceit, and seen the elect as who? Certainly not our Elected Officials? Why not? Has there ever been so much fraud and forgery we have seen witnessed in Obama's long form birth certificate and all of the U.S. House and all of the U.S. Senate, our elected officials and shepherds, silent? If you want a modern day prophesy fulfilled to your own eyes asking how that the elect could be deceived, you might just have seen a revelation of the Bible fulfilled in our 2008-2011 Congress and all the Presidential Candidates in 2012 , save one.

For those so stunned by these revelations, it’s nothing new. We've all known this and seen it as an inconvenient truth. What can and should be done about it is about what I hope you'll listen to and it really wouldn't take that much effort by a small number of people reminiscent of our American Revolution.

If everyone in The Birther Movement would circle their wagons around me as a 2012 Candidate, of which I am registered legally with the Federal Election Commission, we could push our way in to the Democrat Primaries very easily by registering as Democrats and voting for me in the Caucuses and Primaries as well as contributing to my campaign which you can do by making a check out and sending it to :
Cody Robert Judy for President 2012
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
3031 So. Ogden Ave. Suite #2
Ogden , UT. 84403

With just a little support from everyone, I'm almost positive Obama will not make it to the 2012 General Election. If he does and Republican's think they can beat him without raising the 'TRUTH' as a standard of our Constitution, then they are really no better than Obama himself as for sweeping dirt under the carpet. If your okay with that dirt, the issues of freedom and liberty in our individual rights also in the Constitution your sacrificing by silent dismissal.

This support needs to happen now. Many People forget that the Primaries happen starting as early as late January and early February for Iowa, New Hampshire, even Hawaii. Wouldn't it be great to defeat Obama in Hawaii with a presentation that shows what a fraud and forgery his identity is? Don't think Democrats are all bad people because of Obama anymore then Republicans are all bad people because of McCain, they were both ineligible and I can hammer that message through with power and the stand I took in 2008 as evidence.

Please everyone that may read this, you can do your part. If you’re not able to send any cash, you can write JB Williams and others informing them of their leadership ability and voice that is needed here and now supporting my candidacy. I have worked tirelessly on my campaigns in 2008 and now in 2012 because I believed in your ability to support the principles I have supported in the race for President. What I'm asking you to do now is believe in yourself enough to support what we represent already.

JB Williams said "

"But every candidate for the office of president has legal standing to challenge the constitutional eligibility of any competing candidate and at least one candidate must have the courage to do it, or none of them deserve the support of the American voter." ,and, "If there is not a single candidate with the backbone to take a stand, then our nation must endure a horrific era of social strife in order to one day return to its foundational principles and values. If there is no candidate with the backbone to stop the treasonous fraud against the constitution and the people, then leaving the fraud in office is the best strategy.", What may be said of American's not supporting the one candidate who is standing against the treasonous fraud and leaving him in office? How do you feel about calling yourself a treasonous fraud of America’s Constitution? It doesn’t sound real good does it?

That is why the question comes down to "Are you willing to put your money where your mouth is JB? And are You?", as good ole Uncle Sam might point and say. Its a question everyone of us must ask. As I've stated before are you willing to write a check out for $20 or $50 or $100 or whatever you can because I'm in it for all I have, and nothing is going to change that.

Most conservatives have heard of my campaign already as The Post & Email has very patriotically covered here: here:

Here is my web site
YouTube Station is : CODE4PRES
The vision of our founders provides for us the principles we can believe in. That is why I included in my formal FEC Organization name our United States Constitution. May God bless America's Patriots who are reformative revolutionist for the U.S.C. that has made America's Economy and can restore America's Economy with principle over party? Please review a couple of letters from JB Williams to me below as well as Bob Schieffer's and Whoopi Goldbergs comments of racism. Understanding McCain's pass by Republicans explains their hesitency against Obama's Eligibility, because of the label Trump received by the Media.

Cody Robert Judy
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign

Cody Robert Judy for President 2012
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
3031 So. Ogden Ave. Suite #2
Ogden, UT. 84403

For those interested I am posting a couple of the emails I have received from JB Williams in 2009 in the good faith that shows he does not respect one of the two prong test in Natural Born Citizen. That of being born in the United States. The reason for this as you can surmise is he has justified Sen. John McCain's foreign soil birth with an excuse of military parents which our Founders neither sanctioned or placed in the Constitution knowing and having much experience with military wars in foreign lands. Their exception: ' or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution.'

This is JB's fruitless stand to try and make the Eligibility Demand of the Constitution a partisan stand, rather then a Constitutional Stand. To his chagrin Republicans as I told him in 2009 would never raise the issue because it had become a racist stand because of their support for Sen. John McCain who was 'naturalized' in 1937 by an Act of Congress specifically for those born there. McCain was born 11 months too early and 100 yards to far away so to speak, and not born in any military hospital, not to mention as well, the 2008 non binding U.S. Senate Resolution 511 declaring John McCain a Natural Born Citizen without approval by the House or signed by a President. Nothing speaks more highly of the non natural born citizen John McCain as two acts of Congress glaring in the sun light of 'naturalization' because Natural Born Citizens don't need acts of Congress telling them they are natural born citizens. The law speaks out against the Republicans forsaking the Constitution and then covering it up with their loss to Obama which may have been well deserved because of their own abandonment of the Constitution.

Below are two letters received from JB Williams were from 2009, long before Donald Trump was called a 'racist' by the mainstream media Bob Schieffer, Whoopi Goldberg and many others. Those charges blast the racism charge upon all the Republican Candidates of 2012 if they dared to mention Obama's ineligibility making what I told JB Williams in 2009 true and way ahead of the politics of that time. Here's a quick review of Bob Schieffer and Whoopi Goldberg.

Bob Schieffer an ugly strain of racism running through the Bither Movement.

Whoopi Goldberg " Is it because he's BLACK?"

From: JB Williams (
Sent: Sun 10/18/09 6:00 PM
To: cody judy (

You're an idiot to waste so much time and effort on John McCain. I have no choice but to believe that you are less than honorable in your intentions. McCain has no dual loyalties, no more than most scumbag politicians in DC today, all of whom need to fiund a new career.

Obama is quite a different story... and instead of focusing on the enemy in front of you, you waste your time with someone of NO concern at all.

That leaves me with the belief that you and I are NOT on the same side in the battle for the future of this nation.

On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 1:23 AM, cody judy wrote:

The real story
From the beginning, the story of JS McCain III’s birth is suspect. The argument that he is not qualified to be president because he was not born on sovereign U.S. territory has merit. Additionally, as this research reveals, both of his parents may have been foreign nationals and the same controversies surround the true identities of JS McCain I and JS McCain II—his "grandfather" and "father."

Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 00:04:21 -0500
Subject: Re: The LAW :RE: Crazy Birthers? You've heard of the women, MEET THE MAN.

I am out of patience for your nonsense. You are ignorant and rude, yet entirely convinced that you are a genius on the basis that were able to read someone else's opinion and agree, without looking any further at the facts. That's a horrible combination and one not welcome around here.

You did NOT quote a single law. You referred to the Law of Nations, which is NOT US law. Even worse, instead of quoting the Law of Nations, you quote Vattel as if his opinion is an authority on the matter, and then quote him poorly. Having said that, here's where you are right and where you are wrong.

1) "That the “natural born Citizen” clause is based on undivided allegiance and loyalty can be seen from how the Founders distinguished between "citizen" and "natural born Citizen." "

CORRECT - Native and natural are two different things as well. Look them up.

2) "This distinction is based on the law of nations which became part of our national common law."

WRONG - The Law of Nations influenced the Founding fathers and there design, including Article II of the Constitution and the general foundation of "natures laws" as the supreme power in this land. But the Law of Nations were never incorporated as "part of our national common law."

(A quick review of The Law of Nations found inside our Constitution JB)

3) "According to that law as explained by E. Vattel"

First, Vattel wrote an "opinion" based upon his interpretation of the Law of Nations. In doing so, he completely ignored the history driving the writing and passage of that law, namely, establishing that a "natural born child" of the Royal Family would be such, no matter where they were born, as a matter of bloodline, not birth place. Further, you cherry pick Vattel, ignoring this statement "The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children;" and this one "I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country." from Vattel.

4) The 14th Amendment is NOT related and has NO bearing on the matter - CORRECT!

5) "Never having been changed, the original constitutional meaning of a "natural born Citizen" prevails today."

CORRECT AGAIN! But instead of reading Vattel, you should try reading the Law of Nations and the history behind it. If you do that, you will learn that Vattel had an opinion different than the text and history of the Law of Nations.

6) "Not holding McCain to the law and holding Obama to it at the time of his birth with his 17 year old mother not a U.S. Citizen long enough to give her son U.S. Natural Born Status before marrying into Kenya and British allegience, is or must be racist? It is the only conclusion?"

DEAD WRONG and overtly childish. It has nothing whatsoever to do with race. It has to do with the fact that McCain is the natural son of TWO American parents and Obama is NOT. Nothing else... Like all good leftists, you want it to be about race. If that makes you sleep better, knock yourself out. But if Obama was purple and McCain was green, McCain would still be the son of TWO US citizens and Obama still wouldn't be. Your problem isn't that I hold Obama accountable on this basis, because you do too. Your complaint is that I don't hold McCain accountable for the same offense, but that's because McCain is not guilty of the same offense.

The difference is McCain has always been 100% US Citizen and the natural son of of TWO US citizens, with NO sign of foreign loyalties anywhere in hi life or that of his parents. Obama has always been the son of an Arab-Muslim from Kenya. As even Vattel points out, "The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children;" and this one "I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country."

(This statement by JB assures all that he has forgotten about being born in the United States and the natural affection one will always have for their place of birth. One of the two prongs in the natural born citizen qualification demands)

You are a racist, because your judgment is blinded by the issue of race.... my position is color-blind.

( How could I be seen as 'racist' if I sued both McCain and Obama for not fullfilling the Constitutions demands for Natural Born Citizen. McCain fails within the United States, Obama fails of Citizen Parents. exclude one and you open the door for a racism charge, or a reverse racism charge, sue both and you have a Constitutional Claim that is equal under the law)

Last, any time spent on McCain is wasted time. You are arguing that a man who will never be president, can't be president. Meanwhile, another man who really can't be president, is president, and he's busy destroying this nation while you play with yourself over McCain...

Leftists raised the question about McCain, to distract attention away from their own candidate on the matter. It worked... look how much time and energy you have wasted chasing McCain, who will never be president with or without Article II.

( It could be said that those who were against the Constitution were excusing McCain far before Obama became a democrat nominee for President. Ignoring that is turning a blind eye on the reason all the Republican Candidates dont' raise the eligibility issue as you cry about in your 2011 article- "2012 Presidential Candidates - One Question Only" seen in its entirety on this link. JB Williams
(Sep. 20, 2011)

That's it... Your 15 minutes are up. I have no more time for you. You are free to be wrong if you like. Don't waste anymore of my time with it though. And if Obama stays in office because Americans can't figure out the 1st Grade definition of "natural born citizen," people like you will share the responsibility for the damage done to this nation as a result.


JB, your 15 minutes continues, but in October 2009 you hoped the Republican candidates would raise the issue, but they didn't and you still fail to see the reason why? Maybe someday, you'll get it and start supporting someone who was right, instead of wrong, and quit debating right or left.