Saturday, September 22, 2012

Democrats In Trouble w Obama's Political Polling Nightmare Unfolds

Do you think fair reporting matters? To all those news-castors and reporters gleefully reporting that Obama's sails are full of wind, you might consider the polls full of sh*%.

While Obama maintains crème de la crème media reports, the only ones that will really have the jaws dropping are the ones reporting the half baked measures known as polls.

Imagine Democrats being the most hood-winked political party in America when it comes to election morning blues as in disbelief Romney wins in a landslide.

Riding atop the polls is about like riding atop a fountain of water that from a single valve can be shut off letting you down very quickly.

Here's hoping that the UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT moves very quickly to hear the report on their desk in the conference set for Monday, Sept 24th,2012 in Judy v. Obama 12-5276 and gets back to attracting Americans with a dose of Truth: Obama's not a natural born citizen eligible to occupy the oval office say nothing about defrauding every democratic party voter.

Hasn't this got to stop somewhere?

Democrats in trouble with oversampling of Dem voters in most all the polls Obama's political polling nightmare

UnSkewed Polling Data
Sunday, September 23, 2012 12:20:09 AM
Poll Date Sample MoE Obama(D) Romney(R) Spread
UnSkewed Avg. 9/4 - 9/20 -- -- 44.0 51.8 Romney +7.8
Reason/Rupe 9/13 - 9/17 787 LV 4.3 45.0 52.0 Romney +7
Reuters/Ipsos 9/12 - 9/20 1437 LV 2.9 44.0 54.0 Romney +10
NBC News/WSJ 9/12 - 9/16 736 LV 3.6 44.0 51.0 Romney +7
Monmouth Univ. 9/13 - 9/16 1344 LV 2.5 45.0 50.0 Romney +5
QStarNews 9/10 - 9/15 2075 3.0 44.0 55.0 Romney +11
NY Times/CBS News 9/8 - 9/12 1162 LV 3.0 44.0 51.0 Romney +7
Democracy Corps 9/8 - 9/12 1000 LV 3.1 43.0 52.0 Romney +8
Fox News 9/9 - 9/11 1056 LV 3.0 45.0 48.0 Romney +3
Wash. Post/ABC News 9/7 - 9/9 826 LV 4.0 45.0 52.0 Romney +7
CNN/ORC 9/7 - 9/9 875 RV 3.5 45.0 53.0 Romney +8
IBD/CSM/TIPP 9/4 - 9/9 808 RV 3.5 41.0 50.0 Romney +9
ARG 9/4 - 9/6 1200 LV 3.0 43.0 53.0 Romney +10

Friday, September 21, 2012

Romney's Mormonism v. Obama's Muslim-ism

Romney's Mormonism v. Obama's Muslim for Islam?

Protecting the Right to Offend- Mormon Rising or Double Standard?

Since the unjustified assaults on the U.S. embassies and consulates in Egypt, Libya, and over 23 countries Glenn Beck linked the Libya Cover Up and attack to an assault on free speech basically asking the question "Is Obama a Crook?".

I think just like Fast and Furious was the brain-child as a blow to our 2nd Amendment until its cover was blown, that Libya's Cover-up is indeed an aggravated assault on our 1st Amend as a 'video' up for months with only 40,000 hits prior to our U.S. Ambassador Chris Steven's last breath,finds it way into being the cause of an uproar that spans 23 countries.

That kind of reminds me of a video of Romney's "47% remark" going global after sitting for 4 months undiscovered. How convenient for Obama's campaign to have the 47% working everywhere. America might just find that her leaders are in fact unable to travel abroad because of the U.N's desire to abrogate America's will. Indeed the U.N. might find out the meaning of spiting your own nose off to spite your face. Its a lose lose proposition.

Obama himself is laid open to law suit by Iran's own “A complaint could be filed with US courts against Obama for his violation of articles 18 and 27 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) calling for respect of faiths,” Javad Mohammadi, the deputy head of the Supreme Council of Cultural Revolution (SCCR), said on Sunday.

Can Americans think of any other reason to celebrate the passage of the U.N. Small Arms Treaty yesterday which the Obama Administration and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton passed off on, other than to get Obama locked up by the U.N. for Fast and Furious citing the purpose of the small arms treaty as "highlighting the international community’s renewed commitment to preventing, combating and eradicating the illicit trade."

So, 6 years to disarm us, at two year intervals. Can we expect legislation, more false flag operations and the continued dumbing down of America’s youth, to accept the yoke of a particular religion? Will it be Romney's Mormonism or Obama's Islam?

It sure fits the same pattern/assault on our United States Constitution Obama and his Administration has been consistent on, but you can see it took an assault on the qualifications of the Office of the President to orchestrate 'Fast & Furious' as well as 'Libya's Cover-Gate' both involving weapons going to the wrong side in the order of that agenda through the office of the President.

People wonder why the demanding qualifications of a 'natural born citizen' was instituted in our Constitution in the first place. It wisely places a two-generation gap between foreign leaders ambitions and the Office that has the power to orchestrate such things.

Now let's examine a few other things along the same line of Beck's logic:

If Glenn Beck believes in his own report, you might think it would be an easy conversion for him to be a Birther, but he remains distant from The Birther Movement, calling all the work and investigation by Sheriff Joe a 'distraction' and somehow honoring Sen.Hillary Clinton's investigation that put to rest her ambition for President. See Becks' rant here against the Birther Movement where he notes the qualification demands for President in Obama's case 'kept him up for wait half a minute.'

Now consider Utah's U.S. Senator Orrin Hatch's push to eliminate the security clause of the Constitution on the office of the President made public for Republican Arnold Schwarzenegger, here,
Senator Hatch concluded: "The restriction on the foreign-born "has become an anachronism that is decidedly un-American,"

Wow! Republicans' have to be so proud of that one.

2004 Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., a Judiciary committee member, sees merit in the restriction. "I don't think it is unfair to say the president of the United States should be a native-born citizen," she said at the hearing. "Your allegiance is driven by your birth.", but she sure as hell doesn't include Obama in that remark.

Now with the seat of the Presidency on the line Mitt Romney's line of "No one's ever asked to see my birth certificate. They know that this is the place that I was born and raised.", is not seen as a joke, while Mitt passed it off as one.

So which is it?

Mitt Romney, Glenn Beck, and Orrin Hatch all share in common the Mormon Faith, and in 1993 I went to prison for 8 years based on an offense of words, it can't be any clearer then said exactly like that.

I made a statement to then President of the Quorum that I did not intend to hurt anyone, and claimed the "Book of Mormon" was abbreviated B.O.M., backed up with that particular evidence, in a religious meeting, where the broadest of 1st Amendment rights should be respected.

In 2002 The Daily Show even did a show about this.

Did the Mormon religion respect the 1st Amendment rights? Did Utah's Mormon leaders respect the Constitution over their faith?

The answer was clearly "no", they did not. All of them knew but none of them objected to the closure of the 1st Amendment of the Constitution for their religion.

All of them clearly understanding my case, but none of them weighing in on the side of the Constitution. Would we expect Mitt Romney to be any different than Obama?

Is it any more clear that Obama has financed the Arab Springs with American military for the Muslim Brotherhood take over instituting Islam as a religion with over a billion dollars of support and blaming it when appearing on The David Letterman Show on one 'shady character' who produced a video,then what Mitt Romney did for his religion ignoring the 1st Amendment rights of all Americans in a controversial interruption or protest in his own religion?

Is there a concerted effort to uphold or replace the Constitution by these two men?

Obama was raised Muslim and pledged peace as a Muslim following Islam. Obama as shall we say 'Christian' has been very christian to the cause and power of Islam. America has seen a spike in the upset under Obama who claims our billion dollars was not even a wrinkle in the Muslim cause in Libya and Egypt but we all know without America's fire-power the shariah law would not be instituted as it is now in those countries.
Obama in his own words:

One thing is very clear. Obama has never asked the Congress for a declaration of war in Libya, and Egypt which leads us to clearly understand that billions of dollars can cross the President's desk to any particular religion, and with the past experiences we have all suffered with Obama and Mitt Romney, they have both demonstrated the propensity to act according to their records of which I have elaborated.

There's only one problem with that. America doesn't fight religious wars because we are a Nation that respects all faiths. To ignore the principle in the office of the President is to invite disastrous consequences that the President does not need Congress's approval, and while we haven't respected the Constitution's demands for the office of the President, shall we just 'can' or 'fire' the whole Constitution and invite whatever chaos the world see's fit to bring or are we not obligated to uphold it as our Supreme Law of the Land?

We'll incarcerate anyone we want to for whatever reason we want, both Obama and Romney approve of NDAA ability to do just that and wouldn't change a thing, God forbid the wrong person actually round up Congress and incarcerate them all from the U.N. or wherever, we American's must resist the temptations of these indulgences and the immorality of our Constitution, and the world's clamor for us to join rather than lead.

Why not simply respect America's Constitution, and understand that instituting religions from the President's desk has disastrous consequences, and that defending our allies as Country's, comes when they are attacked by whoever attacks them, if they call for help and Congress approves it.

America is a Republic and that is what we pledge allegiance to. Our leaders and Representatives of Government, as well the United States Supreme Court take an oath to the Constitution, not to the President.

That is why Obama should be clearly disqualified as constitutionally eligible to serve as President or run as a candidate,by the United States Supreme Court, regardless of the power of the party. Let the party do with that ruling what they will, the Constitution is clear and so is Obama's lack of qualifications.

We'll deal with Mitt Romney after Obama is disqualified in Judy v. Obama 12-5276 set for conference Monday Sept 24th,2012 in the United States Supreme Court.

Now should a man be judged as ineligible based on his faith? Absolutely not.., but what he has done for his faith is quite another question especially when it deals with actions contrary to the morality or principles of the Constitution.

The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
Cody Robert Judy for President

Tuesday, September 18, 2012

Slam SCOTUS- Worst Mistake In Obama's Political Career See Judy v. Obama 12-5276

The Worst Mistake in Obama's Political Career Slamming the Supreme Court of the United States.

Obama blast the U.S. Supreme Court stating he doesn't want foreigners dictating elections, how about the "foreign or fake Natural Born Citizen" in the White House SCOTUS - See Judy v. Obama 12-5276 - Time to make Obama grimace? Pass it on.

In a report from The Hill,
, about Jeffrey Toobin's latest book "The Oath", chronicling the Roberts court and the Obama presidency, that is released today (Sept 18th,2012)I think the most interesting aspect is the gloating Obama does with a full Democratic Party Congress behind him bashing the Court to a standing ovation.

You just never know when something is going to come up and bite you from the past do you?

Did the White House or Obama consider political fallout in a standing ovation of ridicule towards the United States Supreme Court in his own Achilles heel - The natural born citizen requirement for the Office of the President?

Excerpt from The Hill Article-

[Republicans criticized President Obama for disagreeing with the Citizens United ruling in his 2010 State of the Union address. But no one in the White House had even considered the risk of publicly disagreeing with the court.
"During the discussions in [Rahm] Emanuel's office, as well as the president's own prep sessions, the propriety of challenging the Supreme Court had never come up," Toobin writes. "The group was so focused on pushing Obama's agenda that the issue of the justices' presence seems not to have occurred to anyone. The administration's anger about Citizens United was such that (even though no one said this specifically) the Obama team simply regarded the Supreme Court majority as another group of Republicans, deserving no greater deference than GOP senators or congressmen."]

As far as looking at the law with different spectacles there is no doubt that Congress was fed the bed of lies in Congressional Research Report of Minor v. Happersett that had "natural born citizen" suspiciously removed from the inquiring eyes of Congress, and the political embarrassment is far reaching.

Please enjoy the following highlighting the Jack Maskell Memo to Congress in the Congressional Research Service (CRS)reports, that fooled Congress for Obama.

Well, I for one certainly understand the United States Supreme Court above holding a grudge, but I sure won't forget that fact that Justice Roberts had to retrieve "The Oath" a second time from Obama because, I believe, it was not administered to a properly qualified person.

That is the biggest reason for The United States Supreme Court to consider that Obama should not be allowed to occupy the office of the President, now they have a damaged candidate for President who has objected to Obama's qualifications, the complaint sitting on their desk as Judy v. Obama 12-5276 before a General Election has taken place, but after Obama was indeed announced to be the nominee of the Democratic Party.

That is my cause of action from which relief can be administered and the American People can at least have the Constitution upheld and perhaps won't be dis-enfranchised of their vote by the authority of those who are to interpret the Constitution.

Please make a contribution today and Take A Stand with Cody Robert Judy, as America has a process to amend the Constitution and Obama has just skirted America. Please pass this on to 25 of your friends.

The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
Candidate ID P20003372
Committee ID C00501593

Monday, September 17, 2012

Kansas Tornado Peals Birthers Who Double Down on SCOTUS Judy v. Obama 12-5276

The Kansas Board met today basically in a formality of allowing the withdraw of the complaint filed by the Kansas man Joe Montgomery and essentially doubled down on the fact that this issue must be decided by a Federal Court. In a statement Cody Robert Judy said "This basically was expected and it doubles-down on my case coming to conference in the United States Supreme Court September 24th, where we knew we needed the Constitution upheld."

"Any decision made in Kansas contrary to the general election's forecast of Obama as the Democratic Party nominee would have been met with appeal that ended up in the United States Supreme Court. The letter I sent to Secretary of State Kobach yesterday essentially informed him of Judy v. Obama 12-5276 and it was clear that in reference to the 'federal court handling this', he understood that's where it needed to be decided."

In a report from the Huffington Post Kansas State University employee Joseph Montgomery withdrew his appeal under duress from unidentified threats made to him and his family.

It was reported in the Huff - "paperwork submitted by Obama's campaign attesting to the president's citizenship" was accepted however unreported and also very clear was that the paper work Obama's campaign submitted was "unidentified", and another thing that was clear was that Obama's Citizenship was not under scrutiny as much as the 'natural born citizenship' needed as a qualification to run for the Office of President.

Orly Taitz also present at the hearing, in a futile attempt to assume Montgomery's complaint, argued it could not be withdrawn under duress, however that is not generally applied in a civil case so much as it is in a criminal case that is also prosecuted by an elected authority such as a city,county or state attorney general.

While Obama's rambling identification is off the truth charts when it comes to declaring himself 'not' a natural born citizen by the true virtue of his father never having been a U.S. Citizen, as well as being infiltrated with the foibles and folly of the long form fabrication. Its as palatable that Obama was not born in Hawaii as the records of foreign flights into Hawaii just happen to be missing the week of his birth.

Asserting Obama's long form birth certificate is a concoction, the art work never revealed by Hawaii Officials, we cannot prosecute that action criminally but are forced into the Civil seat of prosecution monetarily asserting damages as Mr. Judy has asserted in his complaint to the United States Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama 12-5276 as a Presidential candidate in the Democratic Party objecting to Obama's nomination.

To understand this a little more clearly in reverse the nationally broadcast trial in the O.J. Simpson case failed prosecution in the criminal court, but was awarded in the civil prosecution.

Mr. Judy's case sites the nomination won by Obama in the race for the Democratic Party Nomination Mr. Judy was also a candidate for, was only won by conceding the rules of eligibility and qualification demands of the United States Constitution that was signed today 225 years ago.

This has been cause of action Mr. Judy has cited that Obama was not playing by the same rules in the nomination process of the Democratic Party, and never has in the '08 election as well as the '12 election, citing in direct implication the 2 different wordings Rep Nancy Pelosi used in the 2 separate application certification papers to the States, in order to get Obama on the ballots, according to what the State demanded.

In the last four years Obama has released fabrications as official identification to quell the public's protest of this demand, at least acknowledging that the demands were legitimate and that he had better quell the demand come hook or crook.

The mainstream media has fed into the crook part and the 4 years Obama has lived in the White House has turned into a bleeding call to allow the thief-in-chief to get away with the fraud perpetrated upon the Citizenry in campaign contributions that were nothing more then criminal cabal funding as well as the disenfranchisement of every vote placed for Obama.

If it isn't clear to every American now that Obama's deeds don't match his need's in the escalation of crashing America's economy by favoring foreign economies in oil production, stripping America of any superiority in the production fields of nuclear arms, abandoning America's ally Israel, and interjecting a particular religion upon the middle east with favoritism and 1.5 Billion dollars while at the same time fueling domestic occupy movements and no doubt instigating by silence and withdraw the abandonment of embassies under attack, than I don't think arithmetic is your best science. This is what foreign influence in the White House is all about.

If you can occupy the White House as a favor to foreign identity you can level the playing field. If the playing field is leveled guess what comes? War and a big one. For the Democrats to assert they are not the war-dogs in practically inviting the defeat economically in the first four years of Obama, and the planned defeat militarily the second four years, then you had better take another look and you probably won't need to look in a foreign land this time around, but your back yard will be the scene of the bloody battlefield.

Such is the case when the Constitution is abandoned and flat out replaced. Such is the importance not like any other case of Judy v. Obama 12-5276. This is the last stand for the Constitution's demands for a 'natural born citizen' not to be replaced by the 14th Amendment's definition of "Citizen" and the construction argument of the Constitution not to be placed in the open-for-business field of chaos.

Please consider making a contribution to the Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign which has rightly predicted and with persistence insisted that Obama was the greatest national security risk America has ever faced. We can't afford to let Obama win in any poll or the general election and not only is Mitt Romney's trailing but more importantly he's not Taking A Stand.

Cody said, " I hope my stand will reflect that not all Democrats support Barack Obama's policies or his eligibility and I am deeply concerned about the damage he is doing to the Democratic Party."

Contribute here:

Here is the Plea from Cody directly for your consideration

Please make a contribution today and Take A Stand with Cody Robert Judy, as America has a process to amend the Constitution and Obama has just skirted America. Please pass this on to 25 of your friends.

The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
Candidate ID P20003372
Committee ID C00501593

Sunday, September 16, 2012

Emergency Ltr. Kansas SOS Kris W. Kobach Obama's Eligibility Ballot by Judy v. Obama 12-5276 SCOTUS

Kansas Secretary of State Kris W. Kobach LTR Obama's Eligibility Ballot Consideration

Dear Secretary of State Kris W. Kobach & Brad Bryant (Election Cabinet):

This note is to simply inform you of the case being presented to the United States Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama 12-5276 which is set for Conference Sept. 24th,2012.

The scribd link to this action you can read is here:

I've seen the reports on this investigation of Kansas and have been concerned about the political bias reported by the media. If perhaps I can be of assistance to you based on the fact that my assistance would be seen as bi-partisan I would be happy to report to you or any commission. I am a Presidential Candidate in the Democratic Party objecting to Obama's nomination based on his eligibility, and over 2200 hours of law enforcement investigation that has been inserted into the case as evidence.

My assertions begin as early as Iowa and New Hampshire's Supreme Court, continued to Georgia in their Primary also reaching Georgia's Supreme Court and was in my opinion somewhat maliciously delayed by the SCOTUS Clerks in the last session of the SCOTUS, therefore we have had to wait until after the summer recess but have received the first date of conference available in the Fall session.

While the United States Supreme Court has waited to hear my case Obama did receive the Democratic Party nomination, however, in some legal opinions this was necessary first in order that a 'Cause of Action' could be substantiated. He won the Democratic Party Nomination against me violating the rules of competition, or eligibility requirements for the race, under U.S.C. and standing requirements.

In my humble opinion it would be far better to place the issue of Obama's eligibility in the Obama Court by denying him placement on the Kansas Ballot, then to defraud the voters of the right to vote for an eligible candidate. Its very simple, if Obama was eligible the need for a fabricated long form birth certificate, a forged selective service card, a social security card that doesn't pass e-verify, closed college entrance records hiding foreign-student status, and a disbarment by Illinois law bar for not reporting an alias name would NOT be necessary.

There is also no reason that the Kansas Authority cannot admit my testimony on the record to the United States Supreme Court and come up with their own decision prior the United States Supreme Court conference of Sept. 24th, 2012.

With these considerations available to you, I must also make a record of your receiving it, that should the State of Kansas decide to allow Obama on the record, and the SCOTUS decision come down against Obama, the political consequences might not be favorable to you, and that of course shoud be a sincere consideration for you as I was forced to also lay on the line with Secretary of State Kemp in Georgia, and thus was also forced to include him in the law suit. This has unfortunately also led to damages of a million dollars reported and laid at the feet of Georgia in the United States Supreme Court on behalf of his decision.

In Your Service of the United States, Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
Candidate ID P20003372
Committee ID C00501593

What is this about? The following article in the USA TODAY details more:

Help Cody Robert Judy's campaign which is preparing for the Sept. 24th Conference in the United States Supreme Court. We're asking everyone to contribute $25 or personally email 25 friends with this stand for the Constitution.
Cody Robert Judy Contribution Campaign Page here:

Charlie, We'd like to Report "You're Fired"


Charlie, We'd like to Report "You're Fired"

Here we thought you were interested in reporting news Charlie. We've contacted your publisher/editor and informed them of your rude discourtesy at receiving press releases.

Dear Ogden Standard Examiner Editor-In-Chief:

We have received the following email from Charlie Pomerleau and would like to report it as a discourtesy, not simply to the Campaign, but to the subscribers and readers of the Ogden Standard Examiner.

Mr. Pomerleau has been a reporter for political events like "Occupy" and other political active events here in Utah, and it is frankly surprising to us here at the Campaign to find such a bias in the reporting atmosphere at the Ogden Standard Examiner.

Our Press Releases are a matter of public notices as Mr. Judy is a registered candidate in the Federal Election Commission record, and he has also taken Barack Obama clear to the United States Supreme Court case no Judy v. Obama 12-5276, and this is not simply the assertion of Mr. Judy, but the conviction of thousands of hours of law enforcement personal, that Mr. Pomerleau has referred as a "rant".

We would like an apology from Mr. Pomerleau, or we will consider publicly protesting the Ogden Standard Examiner in front of the community as endorsing and fully representative of Mr. Pomerleau's comments, and position on "the news" that's reported.

If this is the position of the Ogden Standard Examiner, we would not expect any reply. In the National News it is worth a mention that the Ogden Standard Examiner is "receiving" the news from reporters afar.
Latest News
The road ahead for Romney has different paths
Dan Balz The Washington Post
Las Vegas drowning in underwater mortgages as police, schools suffer
Jennifer Oldham Bloomberg News
Utah man injured in ND oil rig blast dies
Contributed The Associated Press
Utah man injured in ND oil rig blast dies
Contributed The Associated Press
OGDEN MARDI GRAS: Odd spot in Utah history

Becky Wright Standard-Examiner Standard-Examiner

Romney's no commander-in-chief By Ella Nicholas

Oh look, story number 5 an actual Standard Examiner reporter, and we also notice 6 simply to highlight preceptable 'rants' as actually report able assuming at least a kernel of truth in Mr. Pomerleau's professional insult. Thank goodness for Becky Wright's concern over Utah's past time Mardi Gras, "barely registers in the history books". In real time comparison a Ogden Utah Candidate for U.S. President in the Democratic Party, has the man in the White House on record as ineligible with the results of a full law enforcement investigation included.

In fact as we scan popular stories from the Ogden Standard Examiner we see barely a glimpse of Obama criticism. Even for a Republican State reporting unbiased news that seems a little strange.

While the watch-dog for the Public may be concerned with an actual authority to report Obama's fraud and forgery presented to the public out of the White House Press Room, his fabricated selective service card, his total non-transparency on college transcripts and registration profile we assume based on his foreign student gifts from the U.S., his law licence being stripped based on his failure to report going under any other name, and his social security card number not even passing e-verify, (also a big problem for other illegals using forged birth certificates, we have to wonder why exactly the law requires any age restriction on a drivers licence, or entry into a bar, for all must similarly be dismissed to allow the same rules Obama is playing by under the Constitution), ultimately a simple report to the The People, might be a place to start.

Popular Stories
Romney criticizes Obama in wake of embassy attacks
98 comments · 1 day ago
Romney's no commander-in-chief
33 comments · 1 minute ago
Bank failures down, stock market up under Obama
110 comments · 1 day ago
Anti-American violence could be bad news for Romney campaign
33 comments · 12 hours ago
College football: Utes hang on to defeat BYU in crazy finish
3 comments · 1 hour ago
The right wing uses fear tactics
81 comments · 1 day ago
Romney 'jumps before looking'
36 comments · 1 day ago
Why Romney should and will lose
132 comments · 2 days ago
The real extremist is in the White House ( this is more praise on Obama then blast)
17 comments · 1 day ago

As we assume frankly the Ogden Standard Examiner is remiss to report anything remotely 'national' that doesn't come from Washington DC, we simply can think of no better excoriation than to public transfer this report to every possible colleague of Mr. Pomerleau, as the definitive definition of a lame reporter using his own rant's to define the public news.

While it might be an easier story to sell of a disgruntled political loser whose crying because the media won't report a case in the United States Supreme Court against the occupant of the White House, ... wait a minute... disgruntled political losers don't get to the United States Supreme Court. Call up any attorney and ask them what it cost to take a case from ground zero to the United States Supreme Court, then do a detailed analysis of every republican candidate's expenses from the time they entered the presidential race to the time they ended it.

Now consider the time necessary to create some 180 Commercials and a 500 page blog that you don't get paid for, all while maintaining your bills and you might come up with a simple dedication to the public trust, our Country and Constitution, that has motivated Cody Robert Judy. If that kind of dedication, tenaciousness, and courage against all odds is simply deserving of no more than a dismissive rant, it seems the real friends to the Country and the Constitution must be parked in some unreported battle giving their life's in a raging war also. God forbid that's your son or daughter.

Mr. Judy said, " You know I myself did not expect to still be in the Presidential Race in September of 2012 when we entered a week before Republican Gov. Rick Perry which I believe was Aug 13,2011. Its been an unbelievable test of grit working through the Courts on this very important issue of Obama's eligibility. The whole State of Kansas is seriously considering taking Obama off the ballot, it just seems the general population is just catching on but we started this defensive fight the first round in the New Hampshire Primary and then worked into Georgia both states going to the Supreme Courts. Ultimately we do believe the U.S. Constitution is the hallmark of the United States Supreme Court it just takes time to get there, but we did it and did so before the general election. I'm so unbelievably proud of every person and contributor that helped us get here. It wasn't done with big PACs or corporations, this is politics at the Mom and Pop stage and I can think of no better claim or compliment for America in general."

Charlie- We'd like to report three things to you 1) You're fired. 2) This blog has sold over 50,000 newspapers , , not bad for a city like Ogden, Utah. 3) of course we've reported it to far more. We look forward to Washington DC reporting the news to you after Sept. 24th, 2012, at which time you'll look even more ridiculous then you already do for not informing the General Public of the story handed to you. Of course, that's a bet we know your willing to take and its one we've put far more time and money in than you, so you shouldn't have to worry about your losses?

While we're no fan of Mitt Romney and have highlighted his lack of courage for the eligibility issue we consider to be a national security issue and a direct link to our slagged economy, with friends like this we don't think Mitt Romney needs enemies.

The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
Staff Report

Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 20:01:39 -0600
Subject: Re: The Dark Days of America's Scammers in Presidential Politics

Please unsubscribe me from your rants. I don't care to receive your material.