Thursday, February 21, 2013

Hope & Change 2nd Amendment v. Your NBC Family Defense

Hope & Change v. Your Family Defense

An interesting thought has come up this morning with Glenn Beck commentary about the 2nd Amendment which I think is very relevant to the Natural Born Citizen qualification of the Constitution for the Office of the President. Why not just change the Constitution if you think you’re so right?

One of the many wonderful things about our progressive Founding Fathers wanting to empower individuals as Citizens rather than Subjects of the King was that they realized in what can only be seen as a bow of humility toward intellectualism that it was true, they may not have been able to predict problems that may arise in the future for which the United States Constitution was not equipped, so they actually put in a direct way to change the Constitution.
If you thought your idea was so good with the population, and so wildly popular there is a mechanism within the Constitution to change it, and it can be done very quickly! All you need is a 2/3rds vote of Congress.

Certainly with the mainstream media behind the usurpation of the Office of the president by an illegal person who’s not qualified for the Office of the President, the consenting Republicans in office like Sen. John McCain who actually received his “Citizen” status by law when he was 11 months old, and his “Natural Born Citizen” status in 2008 by Non-binding U.S. Sen. Res. 511 with only one objection by Republicans, and the majority in the U.S. Senate with Democrats, it would be a cinch right?

If progressive Democrats feel the population is so widely for rescinding the Constitution’s unique qualifications for the Office of the President as a “Natural Born Citizen”, which protects by two generations any person from ascending into the White House by the demand of being born in the U.S. to Citizen parents, then why don’t they just change it? Why haven’t they changed it so that for instance a young Supreme Leader from say North Korea could copulate with an American Citizen and finance his off-spring to the head of the U.S. Government long before he passes away?

I mean talk about a good idea! If you were North Korea’s new leader and you wanted to get your hands on the U.S. Nuclear Stock Pile, don’t you think that would be a good plan? I mean that’s all you have to do. Just snatch a poor young American Girl and have a baby with her and bam you have got the White House!

As a dictator you’ve got your entire Country paying you directly all the taxes just like the King of England’s subjects whose duty was to come over to America and subjugate the wild young colonialist in America. You don’t have to rely on contributions to your campaign; you just take it from your subjects at whatever rate you feel will do the job.
What is wrong with that idea Democrats & Republicans?

You know one of the really nice things about this? You don’t have Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, Lora Ingram, Marco Rubio, Rick Santorum, John McCain, Bobby Jindal, Newt Gingrich, even Sarah Palin, and not one of the former Candidate Republican stars who ran for President in 2012 like Mitt Romney or Jon Huntsman speaking out against the idea! What could possibly go wrong?

I mean these guys are acting as the best friend of North Korea or Iran’s Supreme Leaders future children. The foreign leaders wouldn’t even have to copulate with the American girl, they could just fly their sperm over here and have it artificially inseminated into the American mother, and bam 9 months later out pops their kid on U.S. Soil, and 35 years later they have their own son or daughter controlling the whole nuclear arsenal of the United States as well as the treasury.

Don’t you think that’s a good idea? Don’t you think that should be a breeze to change in the Constitution with 2/3rds majority in Congress? Look how easy Obamacare passed with a majority in the House, Senate and Obama in the White House. What’s the difference in doing the same thing with the 2nd Amendment if you’re so opposed to an armed American Population? Change it. Change the Constitution if you’re so sure your idea is so good.

You mean to tell me after 5 years Obama can’t change the “Natural Born Citizen” qualification in the Constitution after it has been challenged in Congress with testimony in the Judiciary Committee’s of the House and Senate over and over and over and over as recent as 2000 and 2004?

If you think the idea of requiring a two generation defense in place for the top position of the Executive Branch of our Government and that not doing so is SOOOOO discriminatory that you’re willing to place the entire American Army and the entire nuclear arsenal in the hands of a puppet or subject of the King, then just change it. I’m sure you have the entire population behind changing it, just like you have the entire population behind changing the 2nd Amendment to read “no one has a right to a weapon loaded with bullets”.

Please, let me spell out what a completely asinine paradox this is. It seems obvious but apparently the so called ‘conservative leaders’ don’t get it, so let’s make it very clear okay?

You mean to tell me I’m unreasonable for saying that the “Natural Born Citizen “requirement as a defense of the people from our Executive Branch of Government, meaning a check point of trust by the people from the President, the one guy that controls an entire Branch of the 3 Branches we have in our Government and the one Branch who has all the weapons at its disposal, the one guy who controls the armies of the United States, and has the ability to topple regimes like say Libya, Afghanistan, or in the future Syria without Congressional approval, is something that you would concede on but you want to keep your rifle to protect yourself from a foreign Government invasion?

Maybe you haven’t read the testimonies in 2000 of 106th Congress’s Judicial Committee’s have heard about the really bad idea of exempting the President’s requirement of a Natural Born Citizen, but I have. I can tell you that somehow responsible people with a lot of love for our Country and you personally have made good decisions in not removing that requirement.
I can tell you that it’s really insane, or stupid, or crazy or delusional to freak out about someone wanting to take your rifle while you give the keys away to a dictator that has your own nuclear bomb pointed right at you!
Okay rational hypothetical announcement here coming over the airways with all the major networks covering the President’s press conference:

“My dear sweet constituents who have voted for me time and time again, we’ve come to a road where I just don’t think it’s very good for criminals to to have a gun period. You’ve put me here and it’s been overwhelmingly humbling because, except for the Birthers and their few bastards who tried to take a stand for the Constitution in the natural born citizen clause in the U.S. Supreme Court, for which we know there is a microcosm of support because they are so awful and foul as to warrant extermination, I have made the executive order that I would like voluntarily for anyone who has a gun to place it in their recycle bin this coming Tuesday. Now, I’ve got the drones equipped with a new metal identifying scanner that can actually see into your house and as far as 4 feet below the surface and plain and simply if that drone flys over your house and detects non-compliance with my executive order this Tuesday, we’ll know your planning insurrection and we’ll with the same drone just drop an incendiary device on your house and your whole family will die. There may be a few women and children that die but you must realize we tried to protect you and simply asked you to comply with turning in a piece of garbage. So it’s really you who killed your children and wife by not complying and if you care so little about your children and wife as to not turn in a piece of garbage, all of society will know your not rational and must be a terrorist. In fact all of your children and wife are probably just as dangerous as you if in hearing this message they don’t turn you in before Tuesday. Now, I’m sorry to interrupt your programming please enjoy the rest of your evening and don’t forget to send me $3 dollars for my Executive Order “Americans for a violent free America.”

This is principally the way the proponents of the 2nd Amendment are seen by the Obama Administration and a good reason to draw attention to it. Why would the Government care about your rifle when they have a nuclear weapon ready and pointed at your head and your entire family as hostages? Don’t you think you’d give up your gun for your children, your wife, your brother, your sister, even your parents?

So the question is who wouldn’t give up their guns for their family? And, how easy would it be to declare those who wouldn’t give up their guns for their family probably not rational people?

Let me just say how much I know and appreciate those who have stood up to Obama and his not being a natural born citizen qualified for the Office of the president. I know they actually love you, love our Country, and love freedom and liberty.

It speaks volumes about someone willing to take a stand against such odds in the political arena. It speaks volumes for someone who realizes that in protecting the Natural Born Citizen clause of the Constitution for the Office of the president, and its intentions of 2 generations as a defense for the people,born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents, that they have the best interest for your family at hand.

If you find a politician willing to fight for your family like that and defend your loved one, I’d think that was a politician that was worth keeping around. It would just make sense.

Cody Robert Judy

Wednesday, February 20, 2013

Judy v. Obama 12-5276 - Letter to Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee Rep Bob Goodlatte

Cody Robert Judy
Candidate for U.S. President 2012, 2016
3031 So. Ogden Ave. Suite 2
Ogden, UT. 84401
- - - - -

Attn. Congressman Bob Goodlatte
Chairman of the Committee on Judiciary of the U.S. House of Representatives
2309 Rayburn HOB
Washington, D.C. 20515
Phone: (202) 225-5431
Fax: (202) 225-9681

(Confirmed by phone: Bob Goodlatte Office received this Fax by office secretary 'John' at 1:56pm MST Feb.20th,2013.)


Dear Mr. Goodlatte: 02.19.2013

Thank you for your sincere attention in what I believe to be the most serious breach of security between the two branches of Government (Judicial and Legislative) our Nation has ever faced in its history.

As a Presidential Candidate in the Democrat Party of 2012 I submitted evidence through the court system until finally reaching the SCOTUS in Judy v. Obama 12-5276 that showed not only does Obama violate constitutional presidential eligibility law as a natural born citizen, but he helped hide multiple vital document forgeries, of a “birth certificate,” Selective Service registration and stolen Social Security numbers- all well documented, via official law enforcement professionals as well as private investigations.

Let me say I am aware that in on May 5th,2009 that you co-sponsored H.R. 1503, which was a bill that would require future presidential candidates to provide proof of citizenship by submitting copies of their birth certificate and I’m also aware that on Feb. 11,2013 Attorney Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. filed a complaint with your office regarding quite the same thing as I am submitting. Of course by the mouth of two witnesses with separate instances but in similar contextual circumstances, a serious warrant of investigation should prevail in the Judicial Committee, as well it should, even loosely based on the Congressional Research Committee’s Jack Maskell (CRS’s ) memorandum Video 1 Video 2 that was a misleading manipulation to Congress members regarding this defense requirement of “natural born citizen” vs. citizen. ( SCOTUS Minor v. Happersett ) I would think this would be particularly alarming to Congress?

The dismissal of the many complaints filed in the Courts in 2008 to 2012 was primarily because of lack of "standing” and every court ducked the substantive Constitution demand reasonably based on this important and necessary principle of law which is also a modern day tested and tried Legislative Mandate. However, since my case totally satisfied “standing”, much more sinister and corrupt action has been perpetrated upon me, and I feel the Justices as well.

I believe the Judicial Committee in the House is the only place that serious investigation can be afforded and undertaken that might inform and enlighten the Justices themselves of what is or has happened in their own Court and with their own law clerks as subversive towards their appointments. It’s a well known fact 60% of Republicans & Independents are in favor of this, as well as 25% of Democrats. Ultimately hearings I believe would do more to unite the country publically as education dispels ignorance.

Why are we to assume that the U.S. Supreme Court Justices have removed themselves so far away from Justice that they are willing to be complacent in the face of crimes? Would they really risk their own impeachment? For heaven’s sake, this fact alone testifies very soundly to you that the allegations myself and others are bringing to the committee are true and far less important issues have been undertaken by the Committee.

In my case overwhelming and never refuted evidence shows Barack Obama using a Connecticut Social Security number 042-68-4425, which was never assigned to him according to E-Verify and SSNVS. Sworn affidavit of Chief investigator of special Investigations unit of the U.S. Coast Guard shows Obama using a forged Selective Service Certificate and multiple experts, including over 2600 hours of law enforcement professionals, showed the alleged copy of Obama’s birth certificate to be a forgery.

Obama’s personal attorneys submitted a new copy of the birth certificate, which according to experts represents a forgery of a forgery, which was made to minimize the white halo effect around the letters. This white halo effect created by computer manipulation made the initial forgery released on April 27, 2011 a complete joke. Is this really what our Government has come down to Sir?

For four and a half years now in spite of multiple legal actions, not one single judge or jury ever saw an original 1961 birth certificate for Obama, original selective service certificate or original SS-5 application for the Social Security number 042-68-4425, which Obama claims to be assigned to him. Obama has committed a crime in stating he was a “natural born citizen” on his candidate form violating the 2 generations protection of birth and citizen parents. The manipulation of two different certifications of eligibility is public knowledge. Undeniably, with the Democrat Chair signature affixed to both they are in fact testimony certifying this.

Due to lack of any original identifying documents on Obama and a mountain of evidence showing the alleged copies to be crude forgeries, it is safe to assume an investigation based on Obama’s own covert actions with his identity is warranted. He in fact warrants and clamors his own investigation Sir.

We have a documented citizen of Indonesia Barry Soebarkah, aka Barry Soetoro as the person claiming to be Barack Obama using forged and fraudulent forms of I.D., who is usurping the U.S. Presidency.

If we do not hold ourselves accountable to law in the identity documents from the beginning of a person’s life, giving more credence to respecting the craftsmanship of forgers and their work, based on someone’s adult life, we simply encourage and are complacent with false identities paving the way for the cover up of virtually any crime committed by any bodied person.

As a candidate for President my constitutional rights have been violated by Barack Obama. His assent to the Office has victims of the perpetration of his crimes, and you are hearing from one of them right now. The morality of law is to protect the innocent not to defy justice. If I cannot run for President with the same set of rules against other candidates, the constitutional boundaries and qualifications are of no effect.

If any nefarious foreign dictator can mate with a U.S. Citizen and the child be considered a “Natural Born Citizen” eligible for the U.S. President, the two generations natural defense has in fact broken down to one generation defeating the whole purpose of that national defense. The child can be financed by foreign government to the Commander-In-Chief of our military. That is why in Minor v. Happersett it was stated that if someone was born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents there have never been any doubts to that person being a Natural Born Citizen, but to anything less there have been doubts.

It is up to you; I’ve done all I could. I ran in for U.S. President in 2008 and sued McCain for the same thing because he was given his “Citizen” status by an act of Congress as well as his “Natural Born Citizen” status, which fit into the “naturalized” category rather than the “natural or nature “category. I relate to this as an important factor simply because it dispels any contradiction that I have acted on some other factor other then the Constitution’s principle.

I have been true to that principle regardless of party, and it’s up to each and every American to fight this criminal enterprise ruling the country and regain some decency and some constitutional and civil rights. If you do not fight for our rights, the ruling criminal enterprise will take away more and more of your rights until Congress itself is defunct or released. Then, you would be like me having nowhere to turn for justice. Your hands will be totally tied.


I’m sure we agree when those influential in places of authority have shirked their duties perhaps passing it on to the higher court to avoid the spotlight, regarding the qualifications of the Office of the President demanded by law. If the cover-ups in the Judicial Branch’s highest court could be essentially run by Clerks averting the Justices, without a spot-light to dispel the corruption, evil days loom ahead for America unparalleled, and the whole purpose of the lower courts deferring to the higher courts in important national security issues is lost to appeals only granted by the lower courts and then appealed by the Government.

This in fact leaves the whole country vulnerable to lack of courage rather than courage.

If there is no light where justice should shine in the halls, but only darkness just think about the invitation of nefarious darkness outside the parameters of the so called “place of justice”?

I as a plaintiff, as well as others and their attorneys, are demanding an immediate investigation of both the actions of the employees of the Supreme Court of the United States in hiding pleadings and exhibits from the Justices and Barack Obama’s parade and use of forged IDs and a stolen Social Security 042-68-4425.

My case is not a paid case, but is filed on the grace of informa pauperis which I feel is indeed a great responsibility to me to see to it that justice is sought; for it is the people that have granted this opportunity to me in supporting the Constitution.

It would absolutely shock you as to what I have experienced at the United States Supreme Court level with the Clerks, which I reserve for testimony. Suffice it to say I have never received proof of any of the times I’ve been there that an actual Justice signed an order or heard my case in conference which has been represented to the public as being heard and denied.

I think the only way this loop can be closed is by a sincere investigation by Congress.

Not addressing this represents a gross maleficence against the United States of America and people of the United States of America.

Respectfully submitted
Cody Robert Judy