OBAMA INELIGIBILITY in U.S. Supreme Court
Creates "He Did It" Triangle
Finally U.S. Supreme Court Judy v. Obama 14-9396
How will 2016 Pres Candidates REVAMP Birtherism National Security Question?
The call for PRINCIPLE might be the last one a person would expect to be heard as a pinnacle for employment, jobs, and security but that is exactly what Presidential Candidate Cody Robert Judy has been fighting for in challenging first McCain in 2008 then including Obama and continuing the challenge in the U.S. Supreme Court Ballot Challenges of 2012 - Judy v. Obama 12-5276 and now the Civil Rights Federal Law Suit of Judy v. Obama 14-9396.
"Most people do not connect the dots", Cody said , "But they should. It is an easy line to trace. Principles of Trust, Honor, Respect, Loyalty, Honesty, Integrity, Love, even Courage are associated principles that an Employer would certainly think were important for their Employee in hiring someone for a job. Why would people think that those Principles were somehow not associated with the creation of Jobs, the number of jobs, the quality of jobs, the whole job market?
Taking A Stand for Principle, it is not always popular or successful at first but there are few things about Principle you will ever regret in life."
Taking a piece of clothe from the stand Cody has taken for in the [natural born Citizen] clause of the Constitution found in Article II, Section I, Clause 5 and you will find just how important that Principle is.
When you start adding up the damages of Obamacare, ObamaAmnesty, and all of the Obama Scandals we have endured including Benghazi, Fast & Furious, IRS Profiling, and Citizen Surveillance you start to see a picture that is formed that has cost America's Elections, Trillions of National Debt Dollars, Millions of Jobs, and last but certainly not least the Lives of some very fine people.
Principles are interwoven in Character and are not necessarily reflected in reputation as quite often that is 'Framed' by those in powerful positions, with great monetary- media influence and motivation that is not reflective of Principles. This is the reason quite often that what should be popular is not, and that which is more important is lost in the traffic of a crowded freeway.
That is just one reason that the Main Stream Media has been quick to characterize Birtherism as a Pejorative rather than a Principle. They have been quick to cover its pit-falls rather than its potential. We saw for example a lot of National Coverage when the Same-Sex Marriage Equality of Citizenship cases were being lost at the State Level and appealed all the way up to the U.S. Supreme Court. Reporters took notice of the Court Records and wrote stories of every appeal. People took Notice of these stories, of the Issue because the Media was Reporting it: "Oh.. we'll see this Appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court!"
That same fervor of Principle has not been the call for the qualifications of the Office of the President accept when someone was trying to 'change' the Principle that has lasted through many generations, and in ours has endured 8 attempts in change just since 2003 in Congress. All of these attempts failed. These failures to change the [natural born Citizen] clause from [born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents] have reflected a Legislative Mandate. That is suppose to be what the Judicial Branch upholds as what we would call a Principle of the Constitution.
While the Judicial Branch has been a bullish on the Standing Principle which regulates the challenges of pointing a finger at someone who is not qualified as a [natural born Citizen] for the Office of the President in the interest of our National Security to someone in the Presidential Race as a Candidate against another, they have been a bear when it comes to actually HEARING the claim brought to them by a Presidential Candidate on the merits.
Its never happened in the U.S. Supreme Court before- One Candidate for President using the Constitution to declare damages and another Candidate ineligible. Never in all of our History! There is no precedent case close to the purposes of the Presidential Qualification Clause of our Constitution. The nearest cases make stretches like Minor v. Happersett and U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark but these at best discussed voting rights and citizenship and did not focus on the [natural born Citizen] clause for the Office of President and Vice President. You would think Judy v. Obama 14-9396 was a Justices' prize case..but thus far they have treated it like a slave unremarkable and inconsequential to the millions of dollars pouring into campaigns as well as the voting public depressed with Justice.
One of the things that is undeniable in politics is when a Principle is established, the Candidates gravitate towards its popularity in order to be elected. There is no doubt that the Media has not given any credibility to Judy v. Obama 14-9396. They have not covered the story of Principle. The U.S. Supreme Court has not heard a Case on the merits either. WE the PEOPLE are left with a chicken or the egg which one come first question.
Does the U.S. Supreme Court direct what is news, or does the news direct the U.S. Supreme Court and what cases they take as a popularity contest? One of the great establishments in our Country was created in the U.S. Supreme Court and the Justices of that Court being given 'LIFE TENURE' predicated of course on 'good behavior'.
The Theory posed that giving the Justices life tenure, would insulate them from drifting away from the Constitution based on the whims of popularity which might encompass even the population or politicians subject to re-election every two, four, or six years. That is a great big fat BONUS for being in a U.S. Supreme Court Justice seat. You don't have to depend on re-election.
You can afford to act in ways stable towards the Constitution with a long look down the road for Vision. That responsibility is being called into question because the interest of the Presidential Election, its Candidates, and the Constitution are indeed in conflict with the qualification requirement of [natural born Citizen] ie. born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents.
In reviewing my argument a good look at the Comments highlighted in this Post will help. What this has left us with is kind of what started the whole thing in 2008. Its a Union of Republican and Democratic Party Elected leaders irresponsible to the Constitution and of course leaving out the Independents all together. That was demonstrated in three candidates in the U.S. Senate: Senators' Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and John McCain in U.S. Sen. Res. 511 that established a two parent Citizen ruling although it was non-binding in the Legislature, the "foreign birth place" was left out. In other words it was not passed in the House or signed by a President.
We see now as a result a Triangular affect of, "He Did It", as Rubio, Cruz, and Jindal have Presidential Campaigns in the Republican Party Primary using Obama in the Oval Office not being qualified or "born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents" as a justification of their own ineligibility. In essence these Republican Candidates are hiding behind Obama's usurpation and calling it precedent which means they will use Obama as an example of why, if their qualifications are called into question, they should be allowed in the Office of President. Its like a Bermuda Triangle where the qualifications for President disappear without a trace.
|Doug Henwood's Newly Released Book|
If my Case is not heard by the Court about the only scenario that could take place regaining a qualification foothold would be for instance: if Hillary Clinton got the Democratic Party Nomination, and lets' say one of the three, Rubio, Cruz, or Jindal got the Republican Nomination. Lets say in our scenario of the General Election Hillary Clinton lost to one of them. The question would then be raised, "Would Hillary Clinton care more about Obama's Legacy then her own as President standing up for the Constitution's Eligibility, [natural born Citizen] Requirement?
In other words, would Hillary Clinton be ready to throw Obama under her bus in order to gain a foothold into the White House against an elected Rubio, Cruz, or Jindal,- because she'd have to do just that?
In that circumstance, you'd see Hillary Clinton facing an elected Marco Rubio, Ted Cruz, or Bobby Jindal in a much different way then you saw a Mitt Romney losing to a Barack Obama, especially because she lost in 2008. Democrats do not lose as long as the Constitution is there as a Civil Right and available to them. Why don't we ask Hillary Clinton Supporters if they would expect her to take a stand for the Constitution in such a scenario?
Yes, she'd fire the weapon of the Constitution's [natural born Citizen] clause, and do so with a loaded or protected liberal Court system now too, and defer any previous attempts at defending it such as Cody Robert Judy's as simply not viable and unprofessional. In other words, not rich enough to procure the weight of Justice upon the question.
That flies in the face of "Justice for All", but how often in the world are the poor able to represent themselves adequately and fairly? Was that not one of the biggest reasons it was necessary for the United States of America to form in a Revolution against England's Royalty?
Every time the early American Colonies formed a Representation or Congress, that the King didn't like, he simply disbanded it and demanded new Representatives be chosen. After doing it repeatedly, it became clear, either it was the King's Way or the Highway. The interest of Justice cannot be underestimated in power or determination, but it is interesting how so many Republican Candidates rail against Obama and refuse to check themselves or others of their own Political Party as unqualified.
As so often repeated on this Blog, but serving as a staple, we must vote Principle over Party. This serves as the greatest jobs creator and boost to our economy that can possibly be mustered. If we refuse to do that, our Government will also be Void of Character and the principles associated with a Constitutional Character for We The People under the banner of our Freedom and Liberty in the U.S. Constitution.
HISTORY OF THE CASE
It is not a story of leaching abuse like someone who could get a job but refused to because through that 7 years, Cody has indeed managed to pay his own bills, obligations, and self finance his campaigns for President in '08, '12, and now '16 as well as manage through the Court's sometimes difficult and arduous Appeal process.
Cody has not been financed in the least degree or burdened the people with taxing contributions he used as his personal employment. Most adamantly to the contrary, this story has been one of silent sacrifice as one man felt the call and responsibility that came with STANDING and the unique obligation that rest upon a Presidential Candidate's shoulders as the only one the Court's could recognize as a legitimately damaged party to the Qualification for the Office of the President.
So the Case came to the United States Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama 14-9396 after the lower Federal District Court 'granted' the procedure without court fees, as did the Appellate Court of the 10th Circuit, at least hearing the Case, that Justice Sotomayor of the U.S. Supreme Court refused to grant the case to proceed in what Cody has called a #waronpoor.
The First Conference was held June 18th, 2015. The U.S. Supreme Court delayed hearing the Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis from the cases entry of March 30,2015 a full 3 months. After Denying the Motion at the Conference, Cody scrambled to update the Court on up-to-the-minute financial declarations of both his personal poverty as well as his Campaigns poverty completely unable to manage what can range up to $4,300.00 in printing and filing fees.
A Second Conference of the U.S. Supreme Court was calendared for September 28th, which would be after a long and grueling Summer Recess. However, Cody submitted as a formality to the September 28th hearing already set up an Application for an extension of time understood as its own Case No. 15A25.
Staggeringly this was also DENIED by Justice Sotomayor during the Summer Recess of the Court July 7th,2015. The only positive thing out of that is it more-or-less placed Cody's case on an Active status as only Active Cases are considered during the Court's Summer Recess. Hope was held up for the September 28th Conference and the Application seen as a formality perhaps deemed unnecessary by the Court?
With no money for printing or filing fees, the Court through Justice Sotomayor who is responsible for all 10th Circuit Court Appeals, demanded if Cody's Case were to be considered by the U.S. Supreme Court, that it be held to the strictest degree of compliance with the highest degree of printing and fees charged in a time period from June 22 to July 13th, 2015- just 22 days- roughly $4300.00.
With not a peep from the Main Stream Media of this arbitrary consideration towards Cody and his Presidential Campaign, not to mention the Principle of the Constitution upheld as a Legislative Mandate in Congress, the fees and printing charges required by Justice Sotomayor just were not raised at all, and certainly not raised within the 22 day time frame. If the Main Stream Media had covered it there is no doubt that it would have been raised.
October 5th, 2015 Justice Sotomayor again denied the Reconsideration at the September 28th, 2015 Second Conference in the U.S. Supreme Court.
Consumed with the pressures of keeping the Presidential Campaign afloat, Cody had lapsed behind two months on nearly all his own bills including rent, phone, internet, electricity, and even food. He was forced to regroup and dive into bringing up his own personal bills that had compassed facing eviction, and cut-off dates for his personal Internet, phone, electricity, and rent payments as well those of his Campaigns and with no contributions coming in for help. His computer blew out and he was regulated to the Library for his Campaign updates and contacts.
As is Cody's style, he doubled down and pulled everything out of the hole that had been dug during the Summer Recess, the incessant delays by the U.S. Supreme Court and the injustice he felt being dished out. Of course being dismissed due to a lack of funds is a little embarrassing- Kind of like your card being declined after the Checker has rung your food up and there's a line behind you of impatient people waiting to get checked out and your having to pick items that you want deducted to get the total down to what you can afford and your debit card will work for.
To say Cody doesn't understand the hardships America is going through now in much greater and minute detail is like saying the bear doesn't like honey. He understands the hardships and is living them. A man of the people and among the people .. a friend of the people not many understand to any degree that is and has been demonstrated for the seven years Cody has been a Presidential Candidate.
Its interesting so often the Main Stream Media picks on people who are rich, affluent, or wealthy as disconnected from the People. Like for instance Mitt Romney, Donald Trump, Carly Fiorina, Ben Carson, Jeb Bush and their great amass of fortune.. did we mention Hillary Clinton? Of course!
However, truly they are not interested in someone who is REALLY down at the People's level suffering the same as the people -cooking his own food- driving his own car-and even doing his own laundry at the laundry mat while he continually finances his own Campaign, does his own Legal Research, writes his own Court Papers, and manages his own business just enough to stay afloat.
The sacrifices for Principle are still in Cody's mind, things that he will never regret. They are sacrifices born out of Great Love. Love for his Country, Love for his fellow man, love for his family and the world our children will inherit. Love and concern about all of our Freedom's and Liberties that provide good paying jobs and an equality of opportunity.
ONE LAST SHOT
BREAKING NEWS IN JUDY v. OBAMA 14-9396
"Noticing the fact the Court had not DOCKETED my Application for a Stay on Sotomayor's Decision in her denial for extension of time, I wrote out a Motion for her and Justice Kagan's Recusal based on their perhaps feeling more indebted for Obama's nominating them, then for him as a Respondent in my case on his ineligibility, which could possibly put their own nominations and confirmations at risk.
If Obama, the Respondent/Defendant in my case in the U.S. Supreme Court was found ineligible by the U.S. Supreme Court, his signature is made moot which affects a lot of things, including the Iran Deal, Obamacare, his Nominations for the U.S. Supreme Court, as well as the Budget for the next two years that included an $85 Billion Dollar increase on top of a $19 Trillion Dollar Deficit - 10 Trillion granted on Obama's watch- more than president's combined from George Washington to George W. Bush. This was the ObamaNation and our Nation is in great peril of desolation!
I also asked for a FULL REVIEW by the entire U.S. Supreme Court because if this was the new normal all the Justices had declared a #WarOnThePoor of our Nation. I needed to know if it was localized to Sotomayor or the Whole Court. The following three documents have been confirmed as received by the U.S. Supreme Court.
COVER LETTER TO COURT CLERK
MOTION TO RECUSE JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR AND KAGAN
PETITION FOR REHEARING FULL REVIEW
The following three documents were sent the same time. I have not told anyone about these documents thinking that the Court should at least receive the legal documents and have a chance to contemplate the action. docket them, and perhaps contemplate the Court's own action to them in being very clear.
If there is a #WarOnThePoor , let them have every opportunity to deny it. To dispel it in front of the whole Nation. That is at least Fair before we call them all politically corrupt and morally bankrupt. By following the rules, let them become the law breakers. By being lawful, they become unlawful. By exhibiting 'good behavior', they become the one exhibiting 'bad behavior'.
We've got to get America Back on Track! Like a Train running full steam off the track, rather then wait for a total derailment, we have got to slide her gently back on track, provide jobs, equalize the unfair trade imbalance and start caring for those inside America before we worry about those outside. Its a balancing act we have got to get a handle on, just like I had to pause on my Campaign and get my own bills caught back up.
America has been a great land of opportunity. She's been a Leader to the world and is seen as a Leader. She has grown in stature as well as status based on the Principles of our Constitution that afforded our population an umbrella of rights and privileges as Citizens under our Supreme Law of the Land. Without the protections of that, we will not be able to provide in our weakness what we have provided in our strength or strongest times. The world will not be a better place because of it.
It follows to make the world better, America must get better. This is my Campaign Theme- CRJ Today, for a Better America Tomorrow. What that means is by the Principles I have taken a Stand for America can and will get better and will provide for our future generations all we have come to be able to enjoy.
I ask you once again, and one more time, in this last ditch effort, to pass it on. Let everyone at least know that we have done all we could do. We have not shirked from our duty, nor has our Love for God and Country diminished. We have taken the baton and run our mile with courage and dignity establishing our Honor rather then demanding it.
Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.
Web Site www.codyjudy.us
Cody Robert Judy Campaign
Cody Robert Judy
Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.
Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!
Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!
Cody Robert Judy's book :
Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.
*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION
1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin
The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.
Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.