Thursday, December 31, 2015

BREAKING REPORT: Citizen at Birth v. NATURAL BORN CITIZEN Defending our Children from the Danger of "I-Don't-Think-Politicians" in the coming 2016 Election

 Citizen at Birth v. Natural Born Citizen 
Defending our Children from the Danger of "I-Don't-Think-Politicians" in the coming 2016 Election
A lively and frankly important discussion has been taking place the last couple of days I would like to highlight in the consideration of this Post.  The discussion has take place at  entitled SFW: Obama Conspiracy Theories Public Statement Regarding American News Media and Obama's Article II Eligibility

Without making this article too long with the VIP Comments included below, I'd like to leave with the reader here an impression of the vital American Culture that is always under attack. It goes with the territory of being a front runner we might say. 

America under the umbrella of the U.S. Constitution as jurisdiction must always be protected. We hope our three check and balance system works to keep a particular personality from overruling. It works but often does take time. The process for instance of checking a sitting President unlawfully occupying the seat is not an easy road, and that is the one The Birthers have had to travel.

 I do want to say how humbled and honored I am to rub shoulders with the Birthers. We are all simply those who desire authenticity to our President's Qualifications uniquely American - born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents a [natural born Citizen] as per the U.S. Constitution. 

Accustom to being in the fire, some people have wondered why I have spent so much time over at Doc's Well, I've never been apposed to defending the truth no matter where I was. I have found myself challenged and simply rise to the challenge of debate and hurdles set over there. I have made friends over there I did not expect to make, which is wonderful. We agree to disagree and being in the discussions has helped me refine my argument and to learn how the Anti-Birther thinks.

There have been questions answered in my own mind on this matter when it come to how and what they were thinking. The greatest realization I have had from spending some time over there is that they feel in opinion that "Citizen by Birth" is the same as "Natural Born Citizen". 

This was something that was actually kind of foreign to me. I had no comprehension that they thought that any U.S. Citizen at Birth was a [natural born Citizen] capable of being qualified for the Office of President. It's almost inconceivable to say for me. Title 8 [Nationals and Citizen at Birth] Subsection 1401 (a-h) contains different criteria for [Nationals and Citizen at Birth] and they do not see those as different criteria of naturalization, but see them as different criteria of [natural born Citizen] qualified to legally be President.

This is where literally hundreds of millions of dollars is at stake in Campaigns and Contributions as well as Trillions of dollars of Media Attention has been directed. To say it's not important to embrace the absurd and ridiculous.  

It is to those assertions my comments are directed as well as the violations of my own rights in the denial of Forma Pauperis I've experienced at the U.S. Supreme Court Case Judy v. Obama number 14-9396. If you'd like to read the whole discussion in comments you certainly can baring in mind that there is also a tactic of debasing, ridiculing, and belittling tactics that is not meant for the weak of heart.  

Many of the commentators there like me about as much as what they flush down the toilet and there comments actually reflect that pretty vividly. I do try to stay out of that fray and keep myself above it, but occasionally I drift too though I don't like to.  As terrorism has afflicted our Nation as a whole in many ways, and as we must rely on those in Leadership Positions to defend us, it is vital to our Nation to encourage the qualifications of the Offices that our Constitution outlines to be adhered to strictly.
This is perhaps the core of our National Security. 

No Nation can survive traitors from within and the words of Marcus Tullius Cicero the Roman philosopher, statesman, lawyer, and Roman constitutionalist are as true for the United States of America as they were for Rome.

A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear. The traitor is the plague.

The " I-don't-think-politician" is the one that doesn't 'think' that this person or that person is a threat to for instance the qualification demand that the President only be devolved upon a [natural born Citizen] born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents, because he/she knows the guy. This is not a personality test or likability test, but a qualification agreed to by the Several States in the Union. It hasn't been changed and the attempts to change it have been soundly defeated. Our Nation cannot suffer the foolish dictates of Politicians who do not 'think'.

Getting back to what Doc wrote, that I thought was quite profound:

@Doc[What birthers really objected to was that the media didn’t agree with them. That disagreement is inherent in the system because news organization have standards of verifiability, while birthers run off bias and belief. What a birther believes is not news, and what somebody on the Internet surmises is not an expert opinion. Birther opinion does not qualify as news and what little novelty they represented did not warrant in depth coverage.]

What I see as the CLEAR difference is that truly it is the [ opinion and beliefs] of [anti Birthers ] that are subject to scrutinize with the Facts. And, it is expert opinion as well as the U.S. Constitution that testifies against their steaming pile of internet dribble.

For they declare Cruz and Rubio.. As well Obama to be U.S. [Citizens] at birth, and that they are also collectively [ natural born Citizens] eligible for the Office of President and Vice President.
This is said to be [anti Birther Fact] however it is [ Steaming Opinion and Belief] not Fact.

One only has to address and compare with Facts the capability for a dual Citizen to declare allegiance to either Country verses someone who is a [natural born Citizen] ie. Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents who has no choice by Facts to choose without naturalization proceedings. This is WHY [Citizens at Birth] listed in Title 8 subsection 1401 (a-h) excludes the [natural born Citizen] ie.( Born in the U.S. to Citizen) Parents, and WHY it is considered a naturalization ACT of Congress.
WARNING at the new U.S. Embassy in Cuba.

Dual Citizens – Havana Cuba U.S. Embassy –
[ The Government of Cuba does not recognize the U.S. nationality of U.S. citizens who are Cuban-born or are the children of Cuban parents. These individuals will be treated solely as Cuban citizens and may be subject to a range of restrictions and obligations, including military service. ]

Found at:
What this means in Cruz and Rubio’s cases is their opportunity to be Cuban Citizens is extended by birth place and or parents.

Either one can get them a Cuban Citizenship with the perks. They also can become American citizens by birth and claim all the perks, accept the Office of the President and Vice President reserved for those [natural born Citizens] ie. Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents who have no choice to do that.
A [natural born Citizen] has the U.S.A as their only Home Country. There is no other choice, like for instance Ted Cruz choosing to file papers to rescind his Canadian Citizenship a couple of years ago.

That is why the Facts are not heard in Court. The anti Birthers got the drop on the Birthers. But what they dropped was a steaming pile of Citizen at Birth is also Dual Citizen; and certainly Dual Citizen is not [ natural born Citizen] with no other Country to call Home.
That is why FACTS are mine as a #Birther and the Constitution’s still right after two Centuries. [Citizen] at the Time of the Adoption of this Constitution or [natural born Citizen] ie Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents.

It was a Distinguished Revolutionary Patriot [Citizen] the Country sought at its inception until [natural born Citizens] ie Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents could be raised up with no divided loyalties by birth place or Parents.

That is why the Facts are against anti Birthers who in their foolish opinions find no greater loyalty earned in the second generation of American Culture.

Who espouse other cultures so highly they foolishly do not see an incentive of a two generation wall in the Office of President as a wise National Defense.

Who do not see the Fractured Loyalty of Dual Citizenship acting deep inside a person. For love or hate can both be less than neutral and be cause for concern in a fractured loyalty.
This is why Doc’s statement puts my children and all of our American Children at an undeniable greater risks for what amounts to a discrimination of American Culture. And you can take your opinions and beliefs about my defense for our children .. My Children.. And go straight to Hell with them.

You don’t think or see my defense and all my pleas and briefs and work as a Defense for my children? That’s opinion and belief is so far out in coo coo land I don’t recognize it as American.
That’s why it’s as easy to say…

What [anti] birthers really object to was when the media didn’t agree with them. That disagreement is inherent in the system is FALSE if it’s Tried and because news organization have slacked on standards of verifiability and [anti] birthers run off bias and belief.

What a [anti] birther believes is not news, and what somebody on the Internet surmises is not an expert opinion. [Anti] Birther opinion does not qualify as news and what little novelty they represented is proven false with investigation.


@Keith [If you are so adamant that SCOTUS should agree with the lower courts, why do you bother asking them to disagree?]

Well I think if we look at what Doc wrote we see some hints-

[That disagreement is inherent in the system because news organization have standards of [verifiability], while [anti] birthers run off bias and belief. What a [anti]birther believes is not news, and what somebody on the Internet surmises is not an expert opinion. [anti]Birther opinion does not qualify as news and what little novelty they represented did not warrant in depth coverage.]
My emphasis added.

Many here are able to point fingers at me and express their opinions and beliefs. In regards to a Forma Pauperis Motion, which represents really a mathematical equation for the Courts consideration.
This mathematical equation at best is the least subject to Opinion that a Court might consider and is much more regulated on Facts of a mathematical equation- the kind of Standard Doc referred to as ” verifiability”.

Now another point of consideration is understanding the the U.S. Supreme Court GRANTED basically the same Forma Pauperis Motion in Judy v. Obama 12-5276.

This FACT puts the U.S. Supreme Court at further odds with itself in just 3 years. The two Lower Court grants of Forma Pauperis are consistent with the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in 2012.
Really the only changes where my son’s age and the miles on my car were greater which does not constitute a greater windfall of income, but really represents a deterioration, adjusting inflation, and price increases.

These FACTS are not just tough to swallow, but point to serious infirmity, incompetency, or worse.
A deliberate discrimination that is based contrary to the Constitution, the likes of which you guys care so much about.

Imagine if you will the U.S. Supreme Court announcing tomorrow that Same-Sex Marriage, only legalized a short time ago was illegal? What would be the reaction?

Well.. I can on a pretty sure assumption state the couple who was just married looks at the U.S. Supreme Court and says, “What?! You just said it was legal a few months ago!!!”
My Forma Pauperis Motion is a parallel to that same situation or circumstance. It defies reason, logic, competency and travels to the far away galaxy of beliefs, opinions, Bob and Pete’s medical experience as Professionals warrant.

The context of the Certiorari must be set aside. The Motion for Informa Pauperis is Its own. We can’t or should not mix the two, accept as the Court Ruled allow in for instance disallowing based on Rule 39.8.

Now, for those who can not understand this, we must seriously consider reasons of infirmity, or learning disability, something that would consider a much greater sympathy and care of elementary soundness.

This is certainly not the Standard we seek for those sitting in the seats of the U.S. Supreme Court. Bob and Pete are not in those seats so their opinions and beliefs are not scrutinized at the same level of expectation.

That’s why I have said, understanding all these FACTS should really put EVERYONE of sound mind on my side, and place those apposed in kind of a below first grade intelligence level.

Again – 3 Courts. .the Lower District Court ; The 10th Circuit; The U.S. Supreme Court in 2012-13, and the key fact Rule 39.8 was not Employed.

These are elementary my friends and should greatly concern is all.


2- @Doc [IFP can be denied if the court considers the petition frivolous. ][Mr. Judy has no legal complaint, and his rights were not violated.]

Of course IF a case is deemed frivolous the Court marks that as the REASON the Court is DENYING the Forma Pauperis, the Court will always designate that by stating in the Denial of the Motion Rule 39.8.


Therefore, Mr. Judy’s Motion of Forma Pauperis not being so noticed by Rule 39.8, his Certiorari was not deemed Frivolous by the U.S. Supreme Court, but rather something they simply chose not to see.,ie. to avoid.., hide, cover-up.

Mr. Judy’s rights were in fact violated by the Failure to grant Forma Pauperis seen as the justification of not seeing the Certiorari, avoiding it, covering it up with dirt, refusing the obvious, wholly contemptible, Judicially Corrupt.

Therefore, Mr, Judy’s Denial of Forma Pauperis Motion substantiated the “whining” Mr. Judy.. But no one cares or can do anything about it in this Group so disparaging the boy seems justified.
Clearly illustrated here.

If we look at the facts and evidence on this matter we have a very CLEAR legal picture.

If you feel the same, perhaps you will consider a contribution to my Campaign this Holiday Season in gratitude for the same Principles I have aspired to uphold and defend? From my Family to yours HAPPY NEW YEAR.

 House Keeping
For those who have missed us on FACEBOOK we are still there but have been suspended from posting to the 180 Groups we are members of two weeks at a time, for a month and a half now. That period gets over January 6th again and we hope to once again post to the Groups who have been used to our Campaigns announcements over the years. So join us and help us by Posting our Post yourself. Thank You!

Cody Robert Judy Campaign

Cody Robert Judy

Cody Robert Judy

Cody Robert Judy
Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.
Web Site

We want to thank you for the 330,000 views on this Blog!

Keep coming back!

Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!

Cody Robert Judy's book :

Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.

1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.