JUDY V. OBAMA TRIAL ORDER APPEARS IN UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT

FOR IMMEDIATE PRESS RELEASE:


JUDY V. OBAMA TRIAL ORDER APPEARS IN U.S. SUPREME COURT

As seen on :

http://www.scribd.com/doc/100097501/U-S-SUPREME-COURT-JUDY-v-OBAMA-Lt-r-to-Supreme-Crt-Clerk-and-Proposed-Schedule-Order-for-Trial

Revised Petition for Writ of Certiorari Link Here
http://www.scribd.com/doc/100156244/Judy-v-Obama-Petition-for-Writ-of-Certiorari-Revision-per-U-S-Clerk-Case-Analyst-Appendix-Stamped-Orders-Included


Well folks, what many said would never and could never happen is actually happening. When you read the following letter and see the ORDER Cody Robert Judy has submitted for the United States Supreme Court, you might feel a chill run up your leg if your a Birther.

If your an anti-birther, for there exist only two planes to catch on this issue regarding the ineligibility of Barack Obama qualified for the Office of the President according to the demands of the United States Constitution ( "Birther" and " Anti-Birther"), you may experience a slight cold dizzy spell for you'll recognize along with the Birthers that this has NEVER happened before!

Let me write that one more time: This has NEVER happened before!

100% of the law suits brought against Barack Obama's eligibility have been dismissed either in lower courts or the United States Supreme Court because of "Standing" or "Jurisdiction".

Before the United States Supreme Court now in Judy v. Obama are two Presidential Candidates competing for delegates at the NATIONAL DEMOCRATIC CONVENTION in Charlotte, North Carolina.

In the first movie National Treasure - Actor Nicholas Cage utters as the last word before he found the treasure, could the secret really be that simple, " The secret lies in Charlotte" as he inserts the key and twist unlocking the door to the treasure hidden by Founding Fathers see Trailer here:
http://www.youtube.com/movie/national-treasure?feature=topics


While our Constitution is our National Treasure, it has never happened that a challenger for President has actually reeled another candidate for President into The UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, especially before the National Convention of the Democratic Party, where a decision from the Justices could have a legal bearing on the eligibility requirement demanded in the United States Constitution.

It's unheard of. The closest anyone has ever got to this was Diplomat and Reagan appointed Ambassador Alan Keyes running for president as a Republican in 2008 but that wasn't even heard seen in the U.S. Supreme Court until 2011, where the U.S. Supreme Court refused the Petition upholding the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals decision that Keyes was not a candidate for President in 2012, nor had he obtained his Parties nomination to represent the Republicans.

This is unprecedented to have a Democratic Candidate for President challenging Barack Obama in the Democratic Party, and to have it hit the U.S. Supreme Court before the Democratic National Convention has taken place is the U.S. Supreme Court in Star Trek's, "Warp-speed Scotty".

Upon hearing the news that he was finally going to get his Case in the U.S. Supreme Court Cody responded with a big grin;

" Well, this journey has been an uphill battle that felt as if I was being pelted with stones the whole way up the Hill. I've done the best I could with what I had available to me, which wasn't much. It took me about 10 times to make it up the hill resubmitting over and over and over again, I think like 10 times, but it's good... it feels real good. I'm kind of reminded of the song I wrote "Big Things Happen Everyday" ,because this is a pretty big thing happening."



When asked whether he thought the U.S. Supreme Court would hear the Petition the Democratic Party Candidate for President said,

"That is not my department, that is the Justices of United States Supreme Court's decision. The only thing I know is I've done what I needed to do to get it to them in time ,they do have time for a decision, and I have "competitive standing" seeking to uphold not only the eligibility requirements of the Office of President in the Constitution, but the Legislative Mandate made so by proposals that the Constitution's demand be changed having never made it out of a Legislative Committee. I suppose at this juncture the U.S. Supreme Court is the check and balance of our Republic."

Judy continued, "I do want to thank everyone who has contributed to my campaign. We haven't got a lot of big contributions or a Super PAC supporting my campaign, however everyone who has contributed from many of the States- Maryland, Arizona, Georgia, New Hampshire, Connecticut, Utah, California, Idaho, Colorado, Nevada, Florida, Wisconsin you Patriots know who you are, have been very appreciated and crucial without which I could not have come this far. I need your help more now then ever before, please log on to www.codyjudy.us and contribute to this Campaign making a stand for our Constitution."



The United States Supreme Court is believed to have a case number in reserve for Judy v. Obama owing to their instruction to Mr. Judy to get to them the Stamped copies of the lower court decisions on track to be released to the public sometime after the 18th of July, 2012.



CODY ROBERT JUDY 3031 So. Ogden Ave. Suite #2 Ogden UT. 84401 801-497-6655 - - - - - - - -



SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Office of the Clerk – Mr. William K. Suter Washington, DC 20543-0001
RE: Cody Robert Judy v. Barack Obama July 14th, 2012
- - - - - - - - -


Dear Mr. Suter- Clerk of the Court:
Accordingly pursuant of your letter July 9th, the following Petition for Writ of Certiorari has been resubmitted to you with the following correction:


The lower court opinion(s) have been appended for the Superior Court of Fulton County, Georgia in the Appendix immediately following the “Typed” version, after page 10.


The Order from the Supreme Court of Georgia is also again included, per your request, to include such on re-submission.
A copy of the corrected petition has also been resubmitted and signed for on the Declaration of Mailing Statement served upon opposing counsel(s).
No other change to the substance of the petition has been made.



In the reflection of my July 1st 2012 letter to your office I would like to re-state my concern with this Petition in receiving the Courts attention with the urgency of the Democratic National Convention set to happen Sept. 5th,2012, and impugn the necessity for the Courts attention to that the United States Constitution and Legislative mandates are not delegated as moot in the courts supervisory powers as a check and balance for our Republic.


To that end, I applauded the Georgia Courts in expediting the necessity of action to counsels with email and phone conversation, for example giving me one day to respond to a Motion to Dismiss, in light of the Georgia Primary that a decision could be at least achieved , I presume, that appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court could be ascertained. I would appreciate this Courts acknowledgement and circumvention of recess with “Special Session” rules and powers in expediting expectations for Counsel(s) as the lower Courts managed.


There is still plenty of time between now and a manageable trial before the Democratic National Convention Sept 5th, which I would estimate to be 2 weeks prior, or by August 22nd,2012


The reason for this are that attending delegates to the Convention unbound can manage selection of a qualified candidate for the Office of President, the following proposals I have also forwarded to apposing counsels and can upon the Courts own Order be altered and bound in the attached:


WAIVER OF TIME RESTRAINT BY PETITIONER, AND SCHEDULED ORDER OF PROCEEDING OF THE COURT

Sincerely,
__________________________
Cody Robert Judy
Petitioner- Judy v. Obama




CODY ROBERT JUDY 3031 So. Ogden Ave. Suite #2 Ogden UT. 84401 801-497-6655 - - - - - - - -


_________________________________________________________


IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

______________________________________________________




CODY ROBERT JUDY,
Petitioner,

WAIVER OF TIME RESTRAINT BY
PETITIONER,AND SCHEDULE ORDER
OF PROCEEDING BY THE COURT

v.

BARACK OBAMA et.al.,
Respondent.

Case No. ________________
Judge: _____________________




______________________________________________________

With the Democratic National Convention scheduled for Sept 5th 2012, of which Petitioner and Respondent are scheduled to compete for the nomination of said parties delegates for the Office of President, the following is herein proposed and so ordered that a decision from the Court can be managed by the date of August 22nd,2012. Altered by the Court: ________________


The extraordinary circumstances or reason(s) for this are in consideration of attending delegates to the Convention can , so at the very least they can manage selection of a qualified candidate for the Office of President pursuant the qualification demands of the Constitution, and still have 2 weeks / Altered by the court: ______________ / to prepare prior for the National Convention.


1- Mr. Judy, Petitioner pro se, waives any right of time prescription and the following proposal has herein been adopted and/ or altered by order of the Court.


2-Response BRIEF to Petition for Writ of Certiorari due by July 26th,2012 giving Counsel at least 7 days after receiving it by 1st class mail, postage pre-paid. Reponses to all parties shall be emailed to the respective email addresses noticed in the Declaration of Mailing furnished in the Original Petition. Altered by the Court: _________________________________


3-Reply to Response Brief for Petitioner/and or/Agent practicing for the Court on behalf of Petitioner Due August 2nd, 2012 giving 7 days from Respondent’s Brief due date of July 26th,2012. Altered by the Court: _____________________________


4- Oral argument is herein scheduled for August 13th-16th, 2012 giving the Court and parties to the action 10 days to pre-pare for trial.
Altered by the Court: __________________________________________



5- Decision by the Court shall be approximated by August 22nd, 2012 giving the Court 6 days to render and write an opinion.
Altered by the Court: ________________________________________



The proceeding proposal has been adopted and is now so ORDER BY THE COURT.
BY THE COURT:

THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
JUSTICE(S):


DECLARATION OF MAILING
XI. DECLARATION of MAILING CERTIFICATE AFFADAVIT

Notarized affidavit or declaration in compliance with 28 U. S. C. § 1746, reciting the facts and circumstances of service in accordance with U.S. Supreme Crt. Rule 29 (c)
I do hereby declare under penalty of law certify that I mailed, via 1st class U.S. Mail and Email, a true and correct copy of the forgoing


1-WAIVER OF TIME RESTRAINT BY PETITIONER, AND SCHEDULED ORDER OF PROCEEDING OF THE COURT

Postage pre-paid, to the RESPONDENT(s), by and through Counsel(s) of Record at: Attorney for RESPONDENT: Esquire Mr. Michael Jablonski for Barack Obama and Cam-Anh Le Esq. &Vincent Robert Russo counsel(s) for secretary of State Brian Kemp, at:
1-Michael Jablonski 260 Brighton Road NE Atlanta, GA. 30309-1523 michael.jablonski@comcast.net
2-Secretary of State Brian Kemp Georgia Secretary of State’s Office –Executive Office 214 State Capital Atlanta GA. 30334- cale@sos.ga.gov , vrusso@sos.ga.gov
3- Solicitor General of the United States at, Room 5614, Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Ave., N. W., Washington, DC 20530-0001
4- Sam Olens-Office of the Attorney General 40 Capitol Square, SW Atlanta, Ga 30334. Phone: (404) 656-3300 Email: solens@law.ga.gov
5- Cody Robert Judy- 3031 Ogden Avenue, Suite #2, Ogden, UT. 84403 codyjudy@hotmail.com
6-U.S. Supreme Court 1First Street N.E. Washington D.C. 20543 ts meritsbriefs@supremecourt.gov


On this the 14th Day of July, 2012.
Signature of Mailer __/s/__Cody Robert Judy___


THE CODY ROBERT JUDY FOR PRESIDENT 2012 U.S.C. ELIGIBILITY CAMPAIGN
CONTRIB011.htm


Revised Petition Link here:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/100156244/Judy-v-Obama-Petition-for-Writ-of-Certiorari-Revision-per-U-S-Clerk-Case-Analyst-Appendix-Stamped-Orders-Included