Tuesday, February 4, 2014
Obama: A Friend to None - A Fraud to All
FEATURED EDITORIAL: The Post & Email
A Friend to None - A Fraud to All
Today was cold, but what is cold? Thirty two degrees would be a blessing in Montana or Maine today. I made my way around a few neighborhoods speaking to people. A women opened the door to a small but warm house and in our conversation I learned she was having a real hard time.
" I'm selling these little elastic rubber-bands working at home, making a dollar a piece. My unemployment benefits ran out last week. I'm hungry I guess", she quipped with a smile and repeated the first sentence again as to emphasis she was in a pickle.
"Of course there is nothing wrong with making a dollar a piece on anything if you can sell a hundred a day", I admired her ingenuity and prospects.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid is hoping for a vote this week to renew expired Emergency Unemployment Compensation (EUC) for a three month extension. In addition Obama met with Business Leaders encouraging them to hire the long term unemployed.
It seems almost unreal to me to hear of unemployment insurance lasting 2 years and two months already for the 1.3 million Federal workers who hit the wall in December 2013, because the couple of times I received it was over in a year and you had better do something before then or you'd be joining the crowd camping out, which I've also done before.
Its real interesting that the exact thing that discourages businesses from hiring is actually being considered in an effort of extension. At its peak in 2008 Congress was extending it for 99 weeks, that's 8 years 4 months.
Many forget when each State and the Federal Government leaders stand up to proclaim they are extending benefits, that the money is not coming from the State or Federal Government. Its coming from business people who are going to be taxed and are paying into the system with the unemployment tax.
So, when extensions are mandated by the Government, what happens to the businessmen's taxes and the amount of which they are required to pay? The more they are forced to pay, the less incentive to hire, the more they might even lay off or not hire any more? Congress is doing very little else to help the long term unemployed find work, was actually, if you can believe it one of the 7 deadly reasons its been invoked Congress should pass longer unemployment benefits.
Like Congress is the one that's suppose to create jobs? No, it should be the job of Congress to get out of the way so businesses can operate and create jobs, but so many are insisting that Congress do the very thing that hurts employment growth in the platitude of "not being a bad guy". This is one very sophisticated weapon being used to wipe out jobs in America and the unemployed on unemployed insurance have every right to be afraid, for the day will come they dreaded.
That's whats happening in Massachusetts right now as their legislature considers a bill that would at least level the amount of unemployment insurance for a period of four years for employers, based on the job-killer that unemployment insurance tends to be. Let's face it, unemployment insurance isn't much of a job creator.
They are trying a new scale that rewards businesses that tend to keep employees with a rate of $153 per employee per year, but would sack those companies who have bad records with a rate of $2,337 per employee per year.
Gaming the system by exposing loop-holes such as "seasonal" employment claiming 'unemployment insurance' when the season changed, is one of those the bill hopes to address.
One law maker said, " there are some positive things regarding eligibility and regarding making sure people don't game the system."
So from one perspective those businesses who can't afford to keep their employees are going to be hit the hardest with Government 'unemployment taxes'? Sounds like temporary jobs and those part time jobs many depend on are now on the chopping block. That's what happens when Government starts their little tinkering towards utopia projects, I'm not sure they ever get it right or consider the economics of positive incentive from both directions at the same time.
Well its interesting that one law maker anyway has seen the light and realized the "positive things" regarding 'eligibility', but its probably to big of a wish for them to understand that when it starts from the top down, there is a much greater success.
Yesterday and today I watched Bill O' Reilly's platitudes towards Obama in his interview. O'Reilly was so gracious as to ask Obama if he thought he was being fair to him? What does any kid in the candy store say to his parents when they asks the child if their being fair? "Hell no your not being fair, I need more candy!"
Well, that was Obama's answer, 'No, your not being fair' After watching the nauseating interview and watching O'Reilly hump Obama's leg like a dog in the platitudes of pleasure for raising 20 million dollars with him twice as evidence "Obama cared".
“I have come to you four times,” O’Reilly said speaking about veterans, “And every time you have done what I have asked. And we have raised more than $20 million.” Of course if you look at the Washington Post article of Dana Milbanks, you'd get the idea O'Reilly didn't pitch enough softballs to Obama and was down right disrespectful for interrupting his Royal Heinous 42 times and speaking 1,000 words of the 2500 spoken in the interview.
We are all still wondering O'Reilly what happened from the State of the Union address where Obama said 9 million people had signed up for Obamacare, and the 3 million referred to during your interview. Did 6 million lose their insurance in the few days?
I admit it bugs the crap out of me when a supposed reporter/interviewer turns the tables and starts conducting the interview as an interview of themselves, which O'Reilly does so brilliantly. I haven't watched much of him and watching the interview confirmed for me why.
When "Gaming The System" starts at the top, as Obama, with Republicans and Democrats cheering him on, has done with the eligibility requirement for the Office of the President that teaches everyone that its all right. The message is that basically there is not to many laws or rights in our Constitution that cannot be 'gamed'.
Obama is gaming all of us all the time. If O'Reilly thinks for one minute any person in the seat of the President's could raise that much money for veterans at any given time he's delusional in the fact Obama's is capital in attending fund raisers because for Obama, its more about the money then the principles.
The biggest problem of which turns out to be a terrific exploit on principles creates fraud and exploits the dilapidated trust, which Obama has been able to stave off for 5 years. I think its a terrific question to ask ones self and to figure out the answer, "What is the advantage of having a qualified President in the White House by the definition of the Supreme Law of the Lands United States Constitution?
Is the qualification demand really the intent of our Founders just really being a bunch of bad guys?
No one wants to be the 'bad guy', not even Obama as near six more trillion have been added to the debt during his term. Can you even imagine the next President's claims of inheriting the problems of the past predecessor?
It always bothered me when Bush screamed, "Stop throwing the Constitution in my face. It's just a goddamned piece of paper!" to an Aide. "Mr. President," one aide in the meeting said. "There is a valid case that the provisions in this law undermine the Constitution. "I don't give a goddamn," Bush retorted. "I'm the President and the Commander-in-Chief. Do it my way." in a discussion about renewing The Patriot Act. And when Bush indicated it didn't matter who the next president was their course was set as if they'd have no choice in the matter.
I always thought that's what so many people hoped for in Obama in his empty promises for change. Now even Robert Redford who supported Obama in the hope for the environment has had his hopes dashed out with the empty promises paid for with cash. Redford wrote: "One reason I supported President Obama is because he said we must protect clean air, water and lands. But what good is it to say the right thing unless you act on it?"
Amid 67 Billion in profits in the first six months of the year for big oil companies, Obama when pressed by O'Reilly's assertion that "We were going to build the pipeline" right? I'll take that as a yes, said O'Reilly, and spilled the Kool-Aid every environmentalist has been drinking of Obama's.
Well, when you vote for a fraud how could you expect your money, value, or principle not to be stuck in a tar sand strip mine? Why is it that Clean Air, Clean Water, and the unemployment percentage just can't seem to find a viable solution?
The fraud covering and exhumed in the global warming circles certainly have met their rewards with the fraud covering Obama's Eligibility, yet support for a top-down restoration of 'principle' is about as stagnant as water in a marsh on a hot day. Any one care for a drink? When Americans get their fill of fraud which seems to be happening at an alarming rate, being the 'bad guy' who takes a stand for principle on Obama's eligibility will soon be seen as a being a 'good guy' for the principles that bring back our trust.
Please urge and encourage your Representatives to OPEN AND TRANSPARENT HEARINGS in the House of Representatives on Obama's eligibility as the solution to eliminating Obamacare. These hearings must be held and the evidence must be heard that are in the Sheriff's kits most all of the Representatives have received now.
If these hearings are conducted in the open and reported in the open, the evidence will mount collectively and the U.S. Senate although it has a majority of Democrats will have to concede to the facts and evidences or will be seen as completely unfit for their duties and as incompetent. Utah would most likely see more benefits come from supporting the Candidates like myself, (well, Candidate as myself because there were no other candidates in the entire U.S.A. who stood up for principle regardless of party), fighting for equal protections under the law in pushing for Open and Transparent Hearings in Congress with two million dollars on Obama's Verification Eligibility qualification hearings on the stage to remove him as a disability according to Amend 14, Sec.3 would be a lot faster solution.
Like CODY ROBERT JUDY'S NEW 2016 PAGE ON FACEBOOK HERE
Follow me on Twitter: Official Cody Robert Judy 2016 on Tweeter here
You Can Help Me [ If you would like to help Cody Robert Judy in his bid for upholding the Constitution in “America’s Birther Campaign”, or ABC Campaign ,which highlights the United States Constitution with information and education for voters to understand the tough questions politicians should be answering in 2014, and in the coming 2016 election for the Office of the President please make a contributions here:
Let me now wish everyone a very happy and warm New Year as we pray for the Lord to save our Country and restore America from the dilapidation we now find ourselves and the principles of the Constitution in, for this I am Taking A Stand.
Sincerely, Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us www.codyjudy.blogspot.com YouTube: CODY JUDY / CODE4PRES TV Get Cody's Book: Taking A Stand