Sunday, October 24, 2010

CIA Columbia Obama Trial Standing Find is Still Standing

CIA Columbia Obama Trial Standing Find is Still Standing

Can the all important legal precedent of ‘standing’ used as the harpoon that laid waste to dozens of law suits in 2008 challenging the presidential qualifications of McCain and Obama, be found as missing from the CIA COLUMBIA OBAMA TRIAL held in Harlem, New York, May 14-19th, 2010?

Most agree thousands of hours and millions of dollars were laid waste in the Federal Courts protecting the grounds where the Constitution forbids any to tread in the 2008Federal District Courts contest of presidential candidates. Grand Old Party lawyers didn’t hesitate to use the Constitution in their defense arguments with a defense of “lack of standing” against those bringing the Constitution’s qualification for president to the Federal Courts against foreign born Senator’s John Sidney McCain III and Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro.

Though Senator McCain came clean with his long and short form applications proving his foreign soil birth in Panama, making him ineligible,(*1) Barack Hussein Obama/aka Barry Soetoro was rushed into the White House as a usurper, after Congress failed objection protocol, and after the Presidential Oath was haphazardly administered twice in as many days by the Chief Justice. Obama quickly issued his first cloak on transparency affectively burying deep the proof of his own identity of school, college, and work records; while his long form birth certificate is reported as non-existent by a representative who worked as a manager at Hawaii’s Health Department.

As if the faux-pas of the administration of the presidential oath wasn’t enough, the double candidate nomination forms signed by Nancy Pelosi, one for Hawaii, and one for the other 49 states, signed the same day, certify for the 49 he was not Qualified under the Constitution, but was the candidate preferred by the Democrat Party, really manifested double trouble, especially when compared with 2000,2004. (*2)
How all of these floundering configurations could not be seen as Freudian slips of the false being covered with bits of truth spilled out is the stand upon which the CIA Columbia Obama Trial catches the lawyers in their own pit dug for opponents on the barrage of cases dismissed because of “lack of standing”.

In an article by Josh Richman, Oakland Tribune published 08/28/2008 19:23 PM PDT, entitled “Lawsuit over McCain Citizenship Should be Tossed”, GOP lawyers say and the Judge upheld, the clear reason for legal dismissal of the action Markham Robinson, chairman-elect of California’s American Independent Party brought against Senator McCain was that Robinson was not in the presidential race, and therefore lacked ‘standing’. (*3)

Republican lawyers with that argument could not dismiss the verdict of ‘guilty’ on all accounts from the CIA Columbia Obama Trial jury, because of the testimony of me, Cody Robert Judy. I’m in Utah running for U.S. Senate now and my testimony is seen in the trial transcripts on Day 2 pages 48-77 (*4)

My testimony erases the ‘standing’ defense used by the high powered attorneys of the GOP as I was indeed a candidate in the race, and suffered direct damages from the qualification deficiencies of McCain, and Obama challenged respectively. Nothing in my past could or does come close to erasing these indisputable facts as I witnessed them in the Trial of the century if not the millennium. My witness is available for every United States Senator, Department of Justice lawyer, and citizen of the United States to read.

The absurd argument that my witness is somehow not credible for a past conviction unrelated is to argue that someone hit by a car is somehow guilty because of interrupting or protesting a meeting 17 years ago. The two are so unrelated in deference to justice that the argument assumes anyone being accused or convicted of anything has somehow sacrificed their claim on justice for all time which is simply corrupt thinking to begin with, and certainly doesn’t stop me from being qualified to run, hold office, or being a witness to these illegal actions of fraud on every voter voting democrat and republican for that matter.

In the last consideration of value of my testimony, lawyers will and have argued that I would have to beat, or it should be better stated, that I could beat that opponent. This argument is one in which for all intensive purposes kicks lawyers out of the sound ground of reason and fact and places them on the ground better reserved for the clergy in churches who at least have a fair claim on ‘prophesy’.

It’s Sunday, so why not use and example out of the Bible. If those lawyers could prophesy of the affect that dis-qualifying Sen. John McCain or Sen. Barack Hussein Obama would have no affect on someone’s candidacy their argument is laughable at best and unsound in the least. Even as laughable as the prophets of Baal that Elijah mocked as the 450 of them contested his challenge to call down fire from heaven to burn their bull laid on an alter as a sacrifice recorded in 1st Kings chapter 18 of the Bible.

In 1st Kings Ch: 18:27 we read, “And it came to pass at noon, that Elijah mocked them, and said, Cry aloud: for he is a god; either he is talking, or he is pursuing, or he is in a journey, or peradventure he sleepeth, and must be awaked.” They cut themselves, and bled all over the place but there was no answer. Then Elijah told them to soak his offering with water three times and the Lord took everything up in a fire from Heaven.

That’s what you call taking the bull by the horns and respectively not taking the bullshit. The lawyers argument that no candidacy would be helped by eliminating a reputable candidate who was through his not being qualified attempting to de fraud every single vote cast for him/her on an alter or platform of fraud, is really a bunch of bullshit. How could anyone’s candidacy not be helped by such?

While Obama has stated he can’t go around with his birth certificate plastered to his forehead as an answer to a question unrelated to that subject from Brian Williams, the two questions that ought to be asked by every Republican in Utah: “How in the world can we trust a Republican Lawyer for U.S. Senate like Mike Lee, who is out of the same pattern as the Republican Lawyers fighting against the Constitution’s qualifications for president?”, and , “Why aren’t we as Republicans angry our vote was wasted on an unqualified candidate for President in 2008?

Mike Lee the constitutional lawyer champion he is touted to be, could right now be using the transcripts of testimony found in the CIA Columbia Obama Trial as evidence in a U.S. Senate Trial to kick Obama out of the Whitehouse, thereby declaring the policies that Obama has signed into law void, or moot. He's vowed to fight policies of Obama but is doing it with the hand Obama wants tied behind him.

All those bills do not have any legal standing; they are non- binding without a qualified President’s signature, as is required to make them valid; neither is any executive order Obama signed valid. Obama is the one with no standing, like the emperor with no clothes we simply need to recognize this as the laughable action it is.

Remember the childhood song “Ring around the roses, pocket full of posies, ashes, ashes, they all fall down”? Well, Obama’s lack of qualification is not complicated it’s just that simple.

I am the candidate for U.S. Senate in Utah who is recognizing this, and is running as a write-in. Write my name on your ballot CODY JUDY - U.S. SENATE it’s just that simple- you can do it or you can take the waste that Republicans and Democrats are still serving up to you.

My hope has been to explain this to you as clearly as possible, and that you will recognize it as the truth and contribute to my campaign so that we can help others to see it clearly also.

Cody Judy U.S. Senate



The excerpt of the article here:
(*3).[Lawyers for John McCain and the state and national Republican Party on Thursday asked a federal judge in San Francisco to dismiss a lawsuit challenging the candidate's place on California's Nov. 4 ballot.
Markham Robinson of Vacaville, chairman-elect of California's American Independent Party, sued McCain, the GOP and California Secretary of State Debra Bowen on Aug. 11, arguing the presidential candidate's birth 72 years ago today in the Panama Canal Zone means he's not a "natural-born citizen" — a Constitutional requirement to be president.
But lawyers for the GOP and McCain wrote Thursday that Robinson lacks standing to sue and is asking the courts to tread where the Constitution forbids.
Robinson hasn't shown McCain's candidacy causes him any harm, they said: He's neither a presidential candidate himself nor authorized to sue on behalf of his party…]


No comments:

Post a Comment