Obama's Prima-Donna Orly Taitz

OBAMA'S PRIMA-DONNA ORLY TAITZ

Wonder why the California attorney Orly Taitz who has been coined "The Birther Queen" and has been featured as spear-heading the Birther Movement at times by most of the main stream media, has asked to be removed from the email list of Cody Robert Judy who is a Presidential Candidate in the Democratic Party who was recently given a case number in the United States Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama case no. 12-1576 that actually started out in the Georgia Ballot Challenge with Orly Taitz representing?

Call it a suspicious twist of irony, that the attorney claiming on her web site to be "The Worlds Leading Obama Eligibility Challenge Web Site" find no interest in a case she actually started that has now reached the United States Supreme Court.

The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign received the following email from Mrs. Taitz email address stating as follows:

______________________________________________________________________________

From: Orly Taitz (orly.taitz@gmail.com)
Sent: Sat 7/21/12 6:31 PM
To: cody judy (codyjudy@hotmail.com)
Hotmail Active View



please, take me off your mailing list, I do not wish to get your e-mails
_______________________________________________________________________________
You have been removed Mrs. Orly Taitz.
_______________________________________________________________________________


When Cody was asked about this he said it came as no surprise. "Orly Taitz has been a spear-head of distraction to the Birther Movement. She's been a poster child for the main stream media featured in interview after interview. Let's just say they 'love' to hate her and the distraction has been no friend to the cause that the 14th Amendment did not replace the qualifications embedded in Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5 of our Constitution demanding a natural born citizen."

"Clearly the 14th Amendment specifies "Citizen" just as the requirements of a U.S. Representative and a U.S. Senator does in the Constitution, and no where in the 14th Amendment is the words "natural born citizen" or a correction of the qualification demands of our President."

One finds it personally revealing Orly would want off an email list that puts out maybe 1 or 2 press releases a week at most, and is so relevant to what her own web site is grandly claiming to be "The Worlds Leading Obama Eligibility Challenge Web Site", that she finds no interest in whatsoever now.

Cody Robert Judy offered the Birther Movement one other thing other then his challenge to Obama's eligibility. He offers the Birther Movement in the purest form a Constitutional Stand on the eligibility challenge of Obama because he sued John McCain in 2008 on his eligibility issue being born outside the U.S. Judy v. McCain

The main stream media has been quick to point out that many of these other candidates for President seem to be racially motivated mainly because of their pass for McCain in 2008.

While challenges to Obama's eligibility have widened in the 2012 race, what the main stream media will not let anyone forget including flirting presidential candidate Donald Trump was that a challenge to Obama from the any political party is racist if their was no challenge to McCain by the same party.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1381527/Donald-Trump-racist-Bob-Schieffer-attacks-Apprentice-host.html

http://avazzy.eu/wolf-blitzer-interview-meltdown-with-donald-trump-over-obamas-forged-birth-certificate/

Cody continued, " I think in the Birther movement it is really about time to take a closer look at what is happening in the 'left field' as a distraction and ask ourselves why the main stream media will only invite Orly Taitz on their programs because I can't recall the main stream media interviewing any other attorney, or petitioner for that matter, representing the eligibility or birther movement quite so much as Orly Taitz."

One must ask,'Why do they love to hate her?

"Where Mrs. Taitz has worked tirelessly is at being a distraction with a Russian dialect that made the Birther argument foreign to mainstream America. The facts are when Mrs. Taitz got close to what you would say was a goal of the Birther Movement, she actually moved away from the pursuit. My case in working with her was an excellent example."

"I started with her as a representative of my own Candidacy for President in the New Hampshire Primary Ballot Challenge which went clear to the New Hampshire Supreme Court early in the Presidential Race. One must ask, "Why an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court was not undertaken right there?". An appeal from a State Supreme Court is the quickest way to the United States Supreme Court"

"Then we went down to Georgia and in that Ballot Challenge we did get something that the Birther Movement hadn't every received before. An actual opinion from an Administrative Court Judge that specified the 14th Amendment had actually wiped out Article II, Section I, Clause 5's demands for a 'natural born citizen' in so many words. On appeal to the Judicial Branch Superior Court Orly was stopped in her tracks from representing me, and I was forced to pick up the pieces in Farrar-Judy v. Obama. Surprisingly, Orly refused any assistance whatsoever to questions I had sent her in emails regarding procedure and general advice. It was clearly a blow to the case, and my thoughts of her as genuinely interested in the eligibility issue."

"One must recall now the Federal 9th Circuit Court of Appeals opinion in Keyes (Barnett) v. Obama , that 'standing' and thus 'jurisdiction' was only attained by a Candidate for President who had actual competitive standing, with the eligibility challenge of the contested candidate, in this case Obama. By the time that case reached the 9th Circuit in 2011, the 2008 election in contest was over and the 'political doctrine question' was in the ground as a pounded stake that could not be dis-lodged"

"The 'Competitive Doctrine Question' and "competitive standing" are double edge swords in the Judicial arena and I have written about them here:

http://codyjudy.blogspot.com/2012/01/what-are-competitive-standing-and.html

Excerpt :
"The Political Doctrine Question encourages courts to decline to rule in certain categories of controversial cases. The theory portends, a court acknowledges that the Constitution might have been violated but declines to act in a see-no-evil, hear-no-evil, do-no-evil crouch. It is often described as a type of Judicial restraint, although it can be considered a form of judicial activism against Plaintiffs whose rights have been violated and find their cases dismissed."

Standing requirements
There are three standing requirements:
Injury: The plaintiff must have suffered or imminently will suffer injury—an invasion of a legally protected interest that is concrete and particularized. The injury must be actual or imminent, distinct and palpable, not abstract. This injury could be economic as well as non-economic.
Causation: There must be a causal connection between the injury and the conduct complained of, so that the injury is fairly traceable to the challenged action of the defendant and not the result of the independent action of some third party who is not before the court.
Redressability: It must be likely, as opposed to merely speculative, that a favorable court decision will redress the injury.

"At that time I wrote that blog entry, I actually encouraged people to contribute to Orly's legal fees in her representation because Georgia's Trial was coming up on January 26th,2012. I can no longer in full faith and credit recommend this to supporters and it has nothing to do with my personal feelings as I have never met Mrs. Taitz, but has to do with the facts she's representing and supporting now."

WHAT HAPPENED IN GEORGIA STAYS IN GEORGIA


"While I was no longer represented in Georgia by an attorney because Orly had been denied her pro hac vice Motion, David Farrar and I agreed to hang together through the battle in the Superior Court which had been paid for. David didn't no to much about the law and so I drafted the motions and responses in the proceeding and it was here that I was able to on March 2nd, 2012 interject a little nitro into the case by including Sheriff Joe's Cold Case Posse results as evidence after his March 1st, 2012 press release."

"I felt such gratitude that Sheriff Joe Arpaio's constituency had cared enough to petition their Sheriff to open an investigation on Obama's eligibility and I felt with the 2200 hours of professional investigation that his Cold Case Posse had undertaken, that a step up had been managed from say the private professional investigation field that had been submitted as evidence, and perhaps the Courts would respect even more this legal submission of evidence."

"That was not to be the case in the Judicial Superior Court and it was at this time that Orly had woo'ed the Plaintiff David Farrar away from including me in the case as a Candidate for President, in favor of his sole citizen representation he represented in the presentation to the Georgia Supreme Court, which made no legal sense at all. As the case begin there was also another Democratic Party Presidential Candidate named Leah Lax and an independent candidate Lori Roth who also received the endorsement of the California Republican 5th place finisher for the U.S. Senate republican nomination candidate Orly Taitz."

"The problem with that as far as the eligibility question was concerned in the Farrar-Judy v. Obama case was that legally all the other plaintiffs in the case like Lax and Roth were given a chance to continue the case in the Georgia Superior Court and failed to respond and thus were eliminated from the case as litigants officially in a Dis-Joinder Motion."

"Remember Orly chose as a favored route David Farrar as a Citizen over me, a Presidential Candidate in the Democratic Party positioned perfectly to contend Obama's eligibility with standing and before the Democratic Party National Convention where the 'political doctrine question' would have little effect, in direct contradiction of the Federal 9th Circuit Court of Appeals decision in which she had been Representative Counsel on. How is that not assumed to be 'failing the Birther Movement' when the goal is in site?"

"Orly Taitz ditched me, the only remaining candidate for President she had when she chose to represent David Farrar without me in the Georgia Supreme Court and told me in a phone conversation I could do it on my own. Talk about stopping just before you score and then looking up and wondering why everyone's calling you 'the best player for the opposing team'? "

That alone should have stopped any and all contributions to Orly Taitz in the illogical legal sense she was representing. She was in direct contrast to the Federal Court of Appeals Decision and Opinion that she had worked for in Keyes-Barnett v. Obama and was in the site of all the world flipping off the Judges in their opinion of 'standing' and 'the political doctrine question' with her actions at the same time her hand was extended for more contributions in State Ballot Challenges.

If your a contributor challenge yourself to make sense of that other then to say, "She's being paid to be a distraction to the Birther Movement and make the whole Constitutional issue seem like foreign food", and she's been well equipped to do just that.

With her own actions speaking louder than words Orly's case in Farrar v. Obama was dismissed in the Georgia Supreme Court and she has positioned herself in an appeal to a single Justice Clarence Thomas of the U.S. Supreme Court 12A-25 without a presidential candidate which was also dismissed.

Orly Taitz - You have been dismissed and your title of Birther Queen has been revoked for anti-birther obama's-prima donna - 1

1-The term "prima donna" has come into common usage in any field denoting someone who behaves in a demanding, often temperamental fashion, revealing an inflated view of themselves, their talent, and their importance. Due to this association, the contemporary meaning of the word has taken on this negative connotation.


The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: Code4Pres
Political Commercials: CRJ TV

Breaking News: U.S. Supreme Court Case Needs Your help in Judy v. Obama

Breaking News: U.S. Supreme Court Case Needs Your help in Judy v. Obama


This is probably going to sound more like a journal entry then a blog piece, but I am moved to express some things that I think are important at this time.

First I do want to thank and pay a tribute to those who are fighting the good fight; those who are raising their voice and going on the record. I know the last week I have received more of Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals treatment #5 (Rule 5: Ridicule is man's most potent weapon) these weeks then I have ever received. It’s nasty, distasteful, and ugly.

Here’s just one example that’s tame enough to print-
“Anyone that makes videos of their self trying to be Pres and claiming Obama is not qualified to be Pres needs help. I hope U get that. Do U have a doc? Mental disorders R not to be made fun of. I hope U don't hear voices but help is there 4 U!”

I do kind of agree with him that ‘I need help’ but its more on the financial side in contributions then from a doctor trying to convince me to abandon the Constitution in favor of Obama’s State of the Union and usurpation.

If anyone could comprehend how many people support Obama and picture them all ganging up on me you’d get some idea of what my mail box looks like in the above times 10,000.

I thinking I’m not sure what’s worse:

The precarious status of the Fukushima Dai-Ichi nuclear units and the risk presented by the enormous inventory of radioactive materials and spent fuel in the event of further earthquake threats with 1,565 fuel rods translating into 460 tons of nuclear fuel stored in a pool in a barely intact building on its third and fourth floors that could result in a catastrophic radiological fire that could wipe out most of the northern hemisphere; certainly it would be a massive civilization-breaking event or Obama’s eligibility going un-checked, ignored and avoided by the U.S. Supreme Court?

I know people in Washington DC don’t think about the most prestigious monument representing our first President George Washington in the cracked Washington monument with a 5.8 magnitude earthquake hitting east of the Rockies for the first time since 1897 or Hurricane Irene blowing through the same geographical area a few days earlier being the first of the Hurricane season showing exactly how bad the cracks were, or the 700 mile storm front that bee-lined from Chicago to Washington DC, causing 3 million to lose power -The very symbolism of losing power in an area like The Beltway is as poignant as it is profound, not to mention Obama's same course from Illinoise to Washington DC being traced; as part of God pointing out Obama’s ineligibility, but if you had to trace God’s finger it’s no stretch of the imagination to say our Founding Fathers are pissed off people!

To read Ann Barnhardt’s sentiments about the situation involving Obama’s ineligibility and the U.S. Supreme Court’s majority ruling which “Ok’d” a tax on every American’s very existence making it a possible crime to be born breathing if you don’t pay, well she said it very well I think:
http://radiopatriot.wordpress.com/2012/07/09/will-it-take-a-junta-if-so-wholl-lead-it/
“I don’t want the people who are living on this continent ten or twenty years from now to be able to whine and deflect responsibility for their sorry, sorry state by claiming that “no one ever told us” or “no one ever explained anything to us.” No, you were told. You were warned. And it wasn’t just me doing the warning and explaining. You will accept your suffering in SILENCE. You will blame nothing and no one except YOURSELVES. You will own the tyranny that you live under, because you begged for it. You bought it with your own stupidity, and you nurtured it with your own squealing cowardice.”

I do think she’s probably right about the Government as it stands now never repealing any part of ACA whether Republican Mitt Romney is in charge or Obama’s ineligibility never meets the U.S. Constitution head on.

She says thoughtfully as Ann always does, Republicans ‘will start referencing the fact that ObamaCare is SCOTUS-approved, and approved by Chief Justice Roberts, no less. They will also start to argue that it would cause “chaos” to repeal it. Day by day, this rhetoric will increase. It will begin on the news channels, then spill over into the faux-conservative blogs like HotAir.com . I wait with bated breath for Ed Morrissey or Allah pundit’s piece on how “sensible folk understand that ObamaCare simply cannot be repealed.” Oh, just you wait. It is coming. I promise you that.”

She continues, “You HAVE to wake up and acknowledge that Romney is a sociopathic liar who is simply bullshitting, and that is the word for it – bullshitting you people in order to raise money. He will say ANYTHING in order to raise money and maybe “get elected.” You are being conned just as sure as the sun rises in the east and sets in the west, and if you aren’t smart enough or mature enough to see when you are being blatantly conned, then you deserve what you get.”

Sadly it appears the payday for politicians exist if they do “lie”, if they don’t tell the “truth”, they are rewarded with what you “hope” they are going to represent. Romney reportedly raised 100 million in June. Well we all know what path that led us with Obama, but somehow we always hold out “hope” for a politician who actually means what he says and does what he says he’ll do.

With history as a guide to Washington DC actually having the power to beat the constitution-swords that go there elected with good intensions who then get beat into plowshares wanting to go to the latest Washington DC cocktail party, you’d think Citizens would understand the best remedy would be to send someone there whose actually done time for ‘Taking A Stand’. I mean is that the kind of courage you want or is that just crazy to you?

If history is a judge of Romney’s path you understand very clearly exactly what Ann (not Romney’s wife) is saying. You gotta give that pack a dynamite Ann credit where credit is due. She’ speaks the truth about the big fish in the race getting contributions for the office their running for, but she still hasn’t got a clue to actually putting her mouth to work for someone who is running for office and could certainly use a little positive support and help out here and we all need to ask ourselves the same question:

How will we respond to these and many of the other upcoming events which are poised to take this world of ours by storm? Who are we supporting and to what extent does our support towards that person represent our making the best decision we can?

Are you ready for some hard answers God has for you? All of those answers can be found within. Now is the time to go inside and ascertain the true meaning for each person in the contemplation of your family’s future.

Of course you want someone who pays for it all for you, who pays the bill, and makes the sacrifices so you don’t have to. But how in the world could you gain any appreciation for what our Constitution actually give you if it was all for FREE?

Indeed your participation in helping build a house makes it YOUR HOME.

You know in the Court cases I’ve represented against Obama about 99.999 percent of you haven’t paid a dime. You haven’t raised a single word of support. I’m not so sure you don’t deserve what you pay for. One thing I am sure of God’s going to give it to you, oh yea, you can count on that. But .. I still find myself wishing.

That brings me to the chapter I read in the Bible last night which was so telling of how things should be, or maybe how things are when they are done right and correctly in 1st Chronicles chapter 28:29 David outlines that not only has he gathered all that he has for the Lord’s Temple but he has himself given his own wealth to the project-

“Besides, in my devotion to the temple of my God I now give my personal treasures of gold and silver for the temple of my God, over and above everything I have provided for this holy temple: three thousand talents of gold (gold of Ophir) and seven thousand talents of refined silver, for the overlaying of the walls of the buildings, 5 for the gold work and the silver work, and for all the work to be done by the craftsmen.”

Then David asks a real simple question? I think its telling, but here he is in charge asking people to give of themselves. He isn’t saying for instance if you breath your taxed as our own ACA is mandating.

David says: “Now, who is willing to consecrate themselves to the LORD today?” The response was incredible and amounted to much more then could have ever been collected in a forced mandated tax, because of a simple few words, “ The people gave willingly”. Wow! How incredible is that power of genuine love?

“Then the leaders of families, the officers of the tribes of Israel, the commanders of thousands and commanders of hundreds, and the officials in charge of the king’s work gave willingly. They gave toward the work on the temple of God five thousand talents[d] and ten thousand darics[e] of gold, ten thousand talents of silver, eighteen thousand talents of bronze and a hundred thousand talents of iron. Anyone who had precious stones gave them to the treasury of the temple of the LORD …”. “The people rejoiced at the willing response of their leaders, for they had given freely and wholeheartedly to the LORD. David the king also rejoiced greatly.”

Please take note of the words “GAVE” to the 4th power or used 4 times in those words, also “FREELY” and “WHOLEHEARTEDLY” associated with the acts of giving and the reward of freedom the Lord had given Israel from bondage, and then not only that but the feeling of “REJOICEING” by everyone at what was accomplished together. Imagine our world if our elected leaders gave so willingly to the Constitution?

All of this “taxing” and “putting people in prison” for stupid stuff, and not standing up for our freedoms and liberties that are inalienable rights given by God is not us. That’s not the United States principled under the United States Constitution.

WE ARE CAPABLE OF SO MUCH MORE and its important not only to us here in the U.S. but its important to the world who sees us as a shining beacon of light on a hill representing what people can do with freedom and liberty. We can’t let this go.

I say as David said, “What “change” have you to give towards REALLY standing up for the Constitution and my campaign for upholding it? Will you send me your change?

If my Campaign is the only one holding up the Constitution’s demand for a ‘natural born citizen’ against all the hatred, and devils crying foul, how much more can you count on me then Mitt Romney or Obama’s lies?

You’ve seen what I have done by myself and given; will you now help me in Taking A Stand?

You can contribute here: http://www.codyjudy.us/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm


Cody Robert Judy
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
www.youtube/user/CODE4PRES
www.youtube/user/CODE4PRES


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PU4wzF3RLGs&feature=player_embedded

Breaking News- US SUPREME COURT CALLS SPECIAL SESSION ON OBAMA ELIGIBILITY? Cody Robert Judy says "They Should!"

Breaking News- US SUPREME COURT CALLS SPECIAL SESSION ON OBAMA ELIGIBILITY?

More and more Americans are seeing the value of the work I have been doing over the past 4 years. With the “Green Light” on Obamacare that the 5-4 U.S. Supreme Court held this past Thursday along with a ‘contempt’ vote that was shielded by Obama’s executive order on Fast & Furious, one could surmise we have had some very destructive blows to ‘freedom and liberty’ dealt to us.

I wish I had good news to report about the U.S. Supreme Court receiving my case on appeal from the Georgia Supreme Court but in the horse world I’m familiar with let me parlay, “We were headed in to the class for a show and 10 yards before entering our champion stallion threw a shoe by stepping into a deliberately dug hole meant to sabotage our entry, and we had no choice but to scratch the class, and head off to the blacksmiths shop for a new shoe.

The good news would be we didn’t break a leg stepping in the hole and when I relate to you what happened I think it will be quite obvious that the U.S. Supreme court clerk responsible for this has got a major grudge against my action and dug the hole.
The bad news is the Supreme Court in Washington DC is in recess till the first Monday in October and I’m beginning to wonder about the door to the U.S. Supremes being definitively closed to me because of the unprecedented action it represents to the establishment in maintenance of the status quo, which everyone knows I’m not representing really well but rather exposing.

Now I have never been one to take adversity placed upon me as some grand conspiracy and I believe my record will do for that fact. While I have been tested and perhaps pestered with deficiencies I represented I have attempted more to accommodate those and to understand them, and correct them, where they accumulated into facts.

I just don’t think losing a game legally is worthy of poor sportsmanship and so when I have lost legally I generally shake my opponents hand, congratulate him, lick my wounds, and move on. However, when I am wronged blatantly, deliberately and intentionally I have no problem relating the facts of that to others which I am about to do, especially in light of Obama’s ineligibility as it certainly affects many, many, many more than me.

I relate the facts you certainly can make your own calculations and do the math.
1-Wednesday- June 27th 2012 approximately 10:30am, I reported and show the service of the ‘Petition for Writ of Certiorari’ appealing the Georgia Supreme Court decision case no. S12D1584 JUDY v. OBAMA et.al, I received June 21st,2012, with a ‘received by signature’ United Postal Service Record, to the U.S. Supreme Court’s Clerks office which had been sent Monday morning.

2-Thursday-June 28th,2012 – Owing to security maintained at the U.S. Supreme Court and my own prior experience with them I know my document isn’t going to get a case number the day it gets there but I figure 24 hours later is a good time to check on it because you know it’s not like the DMV where they’re receiving thousands of entries every day and reasonably your document after its signed for, ought to make the Clerk’s office 24 hours after it’s received.

So I speak with Gail Johnson about Noon- EST time, who is my assigned case analyst and ask her point blank if she has received my case. She says “No” and refers me to the argument that you know it takes time from service to get through security and to them, and says, “ call back tomorrow”. I was actually encouraged by her request to ‘call back tomorrow’. This as you recall was the same day the U.S. Supreme Court was set, and did release their decision on the Health Care with a 5-4 vote upholding it in its entirety absent the confirmation that it was ‘Constitutional’, with Sotomayor and Kagan, both Obama appointees, in on the decision.

Of course without those two there, we are left with a pretty strong message from the dissenting Justices that the Act fails quite easily the Constitution, and we are also reminded quite clearly that without an eligible President signing their appointments, their confirmation is not legitimate. Now how important is Obama’s Eligibility? How important and imperative is my case?

3- Friday-June 29th –Noon -Approximately same time I call back and get Gail Johnson’s voice message that she’s out of the office until Monday July 1st,2012 and that if something urgent is needed please contact another analyst by the name of Redman, who also is ‘out of the office until July 1st. I make another call to the Supreme Court Clerk’s office and a nice operator tells me as I relate my predicament that he did see “Higgins” come in and will direct my call to his office. I get a voice mail and relate to him my name which they identify your case with, and ask for a call back. I call again at approximately 3pm EST and relate my desire for a call back upon the matter. Predictably I don’t receive a call back.

Of course I’m not all that discouraged because Gail Johnson related to me she had not received my package Thursday. The damndest thing happens Saturday morning.
4- Saturday-June 30th,2012 I receive in my mail box the entire box containing 11 copies of my Petition for Writ of Certiorari back with a letter from Gail Johnson dated Thursday June 28th,2012. Of course you recall I had called her and spoke directly to her and she confirmed she hadn’t received it.

Very interesting letter received that was taped to the top of the package that states the package is returned for the very same reason it was returned May 17th,2012 because the U.S. Supreme Court only reviews cases from the U.S. Court of Appeals or the highest State Court available.

Pictures of the Letters here:

June 28th Letter U.S. Supreme Court to Cody Robert Judy

May 17th, 2012 Letter U.S. Supreme Court to Cody Robert Judy

June 21st,2012 Order from Georgia Supreme Court

Wow! On the very first page of my document it says in the first paragraph, Georgia Supreme Court Case No. S12D1584 Judy v. Obama is being appealed, and that the Supreme Court of Georgia had granted my ‘indigency’ status. How did she miss that on the very first page, first paragraph signed with a notary seal June 24th,2012?
Incredibly two things available here for us to discern because we know she can read- Either Gail Johnson didn’t read the document as an analyst assigned to that duty is supposed to, and ordered it packaged up unread and sent back the exact same moment it was opened, or Gail Johnson doesn’t know the Georgia Supreme Court is the highest court in the State of Georgia presumed by her own letter to be appealed directly to the U.S. Supreme Court.

When I opened the box up, about 10 minutes after it cleared my security department, another letter was inside, which was indeed Gail Johnson’s letter to me May 17th,2012 that related to the April 4th 2012 version of my Petition for Writ of Certiorari which indeed hadn’t been reviewed by the Georgia Supreme Court, but had been reviewed by the New Hampshire Supreme Court which I argued should suffice.

So, now I have returned to me by the U.S. Supreme Court clerk Gail Johnson not one but two State Supreme Court decisions, one from New Hampshire and one from Georgia, that are legally reviewable by the U.S. Supreme court. I really think this should call for her termination in the employment to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Can you imagine just for an instance if perchance the U.S. Supreme court Justices had been notified Wednesday afternoon that my case had come into the Courts authority and was docketed, that could alter their decision on Obamacare, based on the eligibility requirement that an eligible president must first sign an Act of Congress before its legal?

How big is this case? How many people does it represent and or affect?

Can you imagine one Court Clerk having the power to keep something like this from the dissenting Justices on the eve of their Summer recess until after the Sept 5th National Democrat Convention in which a decision on my case could have moved Obama from even being included as a Democratic Party candidate at that convention verses being the nominee, and the Justices return scheduled for October after the convention?

I don’t think anyone upset with Obamacare passing even has a clue what it means to have another Presidential Candidate in the Democrat Party qualified for a U.S. Supreme Court hearing with two State Supreme Court referrals to them means.
If anyone did I really suspect people would be going through the roof, and contributing to my campaign and calling their Senators and Congressmen and faxing the U.S. Supreme Court of this outrage, and burning down the phone lines to the U.S. Supreme Court. WND would have feature stories about the outrageousness of it, and small business magazines across the United States would be saying “contribute” the individual maxim to this guy which is $2,400 per individual small businesses or pay the estimated annual increase of $54,000 on healthcare for your small business.

Of course I need your help and I hope to have somehow inspired you of the importance and urgency of this case. You know the Voeltz v. Obama case getting so much publicity is stated by Esq. Larry Klaymen to be appealed by either side upon a decision suffered a big set-back with the Judge granting the motion to strike the Amended Declarative relief. Here: http://www.wnd.com/2012/06/this-july-4-a-new-revolution-begins/ and here http://www.wnd.com/2012/06/unexpected-turn-in-eligibility-case-put-it-on-record/ - “Klayman told WND Obama’s lawyers immediately went into a tailspin and filed to have the amendment for declaratory relief stricken, which the judge granted,..” How long do you think it would take Klaymen to reach the Florida Supreme Court and hence the U.S. Supreme Court?

Now, put into that equation he does not have a Democratic Party Candidate for President on the complaint, but a Democratic party member who is a voter and who by the standards thus far used by the Judicial Branch won’t have or satisfy the 3 levels of ‘standing’ upon the appeals into the Judicial Branch?

Also factor in Obama will by Sept 5th,2012 have the nomination of the National Democratic Party Convention locked up and how many Supreme Court Justices are going to see that one clear against Obama? Ask Mr. Klayman about the Political Doctrine Question and he will tell you the chances after Obama becomes the Democratic Party nominee are slim to none after Sept. 5th, 2012.

I’m calling for the only thing I believe will help and that is an all points bulletin to every Conservative across the board in the political arena to rally for my case. I will send it back to the U.S. Supreme Court this Monday and by Wednesday I would like to see about 10 national stories about this outrage and calls numbering in the thousands to the U.S. Supreme Court, your representatives in Congress and the Senate and if you hold any value to reaching across the aisle I even challenge Mitt Romney to come out and make a statement on the Justice happening with my case being locked out of the U.S. Supreme Court.

I believe that is possible if you will do your part in sharing this very real possibility that you cannot let slip by. If you’re a business owner or interested in employment Obama care is a major blow to small businesses and the capital they have to work with that would necessarily be opening new jobs.

Please act now… just DO IT! What can America do from Sunday to Wednesday, for the sake of our Country I’m asking you contribute your time, talent, energy, contributions to ‘Vision to Believe in’ represented by our Constitution and my campaign, The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign.

I believe this case is so important and has been biased so fraudulently by the Clerk’s Office that when and if the U.S. Supreme Court Justices hear about it, that it will merit the call for a ‘Special Session’ to be called by the U.S. Supreme Court Justices in the Order to adjudicate the case without bias towards me before the National Democratic Party Convention Sept 5, 2012 in the interest of voting delegates at that Convention who have been chosen by the interest of State Tax Payers money to vote for Constitutionally eligible candidates.

Tell the U.S. Supreme Court Justices - Tax money has been used by the Democratic Party in the primaries and in such is responsibly connected to the Constitution and Obama’s eligibility. RESPONSIBILITY in taxes was the message of Obama care, let them hear about the responsibility to our Constitution that ‘taxes’ demands in representation.

Here is a copy of the complete signed Petition for Writ of Certiorari
http://www.scribd.com/doc/98883410/Judy-v-Obama-U-S-Supreme-Crt-Petition-for-Writ-of-Certiorari-July-2012

Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us

www.youtube.com/user/CODE4PRES


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RTJkId_GBis

JUDY V. OBAMA REACHES U.S. SUPREME COURT -THE DOOM OF JUNE FOR OBAMA

BREAKING NEWS:

JUDY V. OBAMA et.al., U.S. SUPREME COURT RECEIVES APPEAL OF GEORGIA SUPREME COURT OF OBAMA’S ELIGIBLITY ESCALATING-

THE DOOM OF JUNE FOR OBAMA

June is not shaping up to be the best month for Barack Obama, as more and more Democrats are looking at the toxicity of Obama and realizing that standing by the man is one thing, but declaring their own political future over is quite another.

Just how much weight must be placed upon the anchor before rational democrats who are still supporting Obama decide the same? I’m proud of Utah Democrat Rep. Jim Matheson here in my home state for realizing the truth when it comes to covering up weapon involvement in border patrol agent murders, dealing arms over the border to drug trafficking, and pulling federal programs meant to work with local law enforcement in enforcing laws passed for persons illegally entering the United States such as Obama did the day of the U.S. Supreme Court decision, are not really things that Democrats should be supporting.

Catering to the Hispanic/Mexican/Latino population vote has become all too clearly a mix of bad intention, and so it is with Obama clearly defying our U.S. Constitution’s demands for a ‘natural born citizen’, yet swearing out an oath and allegiance to preserve, protect and defend it. I can think of no better way to U.S.C. Amend. 14, Sect. 3- his sorry but blatant fraud and forgery.

For those hard working industrious people here working legally how big of a slap in the face is it for Obama/Holder/Clinton team to gun-traffic across the border? Why would they do that to people they claim to be working hard for?

Weapons to people known to be running illegal traffic across the border, drugs, sex-slaves, intelligence, and people are okay with that? That kind of makes standing up in a religious meeting where freedom of expression is the most important element of religious tenant and declaring I had a Book of Mormon abbreviated ‘BOM’ clearly represented as the evidence produced, in the Mormon Religion something that deserved 8 years in prison 20 years ago, while the other is seen as electable? WOW!

Come on , come on, come on – People I just know you anti-birthers on the Republican and Democrat side can do better than this. Your judgment is being strung out like a scrotum on the chopping block.

Has that been a service for the people here legally working hard on establishing good reputations or a dis-service?
Utah Democratic Rep. Jim Matheson said Tuesday he plans to vote in favor of holding Holder in contempt over his refusal to comply with a subpoena into the Operation Fast and Furious scandal.

“It just compounds the tragedy when both sides play politics instead of releasing the facts. The Terry family, the public and Congress deserve answers,” Matheson said in remarks first reported by the Salt Lake Tribune in his home state. “Sadly, it seems that it will take holding the attorney general in contempt to communicate that evasiveness is unacceptable.”

To make matters worse for Holder, President Barack Obama and the Democratic Party, more Democrats are expected to join Matheson in holding Holder in contempt. House Minority Whip Rep. Steny Hoyer, the House Democrats’ chief vote-counter, isn’t even sure how many Democrats will break ranks. According to the Associated Press — which framed the Democratic defections as a result of the NRA’s decision to score the vote — Hoyer wouldn’t say how many Democrats he expected to vote in favor of Holder in contempt, but confirmed he expects some, like Matheson, to abandon party lines.

http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/politics/54379772-90/holder-matheson-contempt-congress.html.csp
mcanham@sltrib.com

Now additionally to compound the doom of June for Obama, the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington DC received today, (June 27th,2012) at 10:49am the Petition for Writ of Certiorari, appealed from the Georgia Supreme Court denial of June 21st,2012.

Folks we are talking speed train 'fast-track', in the truest meaning of the word, and we may be talking just in time?

[Date: 06/27/2012
CODY JUDY:
The following is in response to your 06/27/2012 request for delivery information on your
Signature Confirmation(TM) item number 2308 3250 0000 2916 0065. The delivery record
shows that this item was delivered on 06/27/2012 at 10:49 AM in WASHINGTON, DC 20543
to L JOHNSON. The scanned image of the recipient information is provided below.]

There is a whole mess of problems the U.S. Supreme Court is dealing with the constitutionality of Obamacare, however wouldn’t it be shocking if they discovered in the late hour of deliberation they had a case that clearly met the criteria 3 legs of ‘standing’, and gave them power to rule upon Obama’s eligibility in the first place?

I felt like it was a slide into 3rd base and being called ‘SAFE!’ to have gotten the APPEAL in to the U.S. Supreme Court before the close of this session. I know it’s a nightmare but I didn’t plan it this way, it just happened.

Dealing with’ the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act’, the court has extended its session now till presumably Thursday, or tomorrow, at which time they planned to close shop until October 5th,2012. It is notable however that the Court has at times stayed open till even the 1st of July.

That’s 30 days after the Sept. 5th, 2012 Democratic National Convention and clearly their recess would biased not just my complaint, but the whole Democratic Party primary season, and certainly every delegate vote cast for an ineligible candidate.

Just to gain some inkling of what just happened let me reiterate; “Shake & Bake!” is the United States Constitution- parroting the famous line from movie Talladega Nights of which those who saw it can have a smile, and those who didn’t might have a look at a YouTube Clip here to grasp.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sLF31AY25so


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=43FfwAsSV4k&feature=related


I really don’t have a clue to what the U.S. Supreme Court will do, but I do know a couple of things that I will relate as facts to the anti-birther community that continues to roast the Birther movement as wing-nuts with a clue to any facts. Are you ready?

1- NEVER before has the U.S. Supreme Court received a Writ of Certiorari from a Presidential Candidate within the same party, clearing all 3 hurdles of standing, against Obama’s eligibility before the Democratic National Convention.

2- NEVER before has the U.S. Supreme Court received in such an appeal, a total disregard for their own precedent as they have from Judge Michael Malihi whose decision/opinion re-writes the Constitution’s unique qualification for our President that contrary to his opinion was not obliterated by the 14th Amendment’s “Citizen” clause found in Sect 1, which is an insult to the Constitution construction taboo.


Recently U.S. Supreme Court denied the Orly Taitz represented case that took a little over 3 years to get to the U.S. Supreme Court from the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals starting in Central California Federal District Court in Keyes v. Obama. Allan Keyes was a presidential candidate but the 9th Circuit ruled he candidacy issue was moot as he didn’t continue in 2012 and the U.S. Supreme Court concluded the case on June 11th, 2012 with a denial of the Writ of Certiorari.

As a Presidential Candidate Allan Keyes was running in the Republican Party and never really had a clear shot at getting the Republican nomination from contenders like Mitt Romney or John McCain in 2008, so the standing was questionable at best. A similar ruling was just handed down on Presidential Candidate John Dummett represented by Liberty Legal Foundation in a Tennessee Federal District Court case that was basically made fun of by the Judge.

Defendants restate their position that Plaintiffs lack standing. Specifically with respect to Plaintiff Dummett, Defendants concede that Dummett is a candidate in Tennessee for the Republican Party’s nomination for President of the United States. As such, Plaintiff Dummett is not a competitive opponent of President Obama in any election and accordingly cannot establish that he has competitive standing to bring this suit. Furthermore, Defendants assert that Plaintiff Dummett has not taken steps to appear on a ballot in the state of Tennessee. For these reasons, Plaintiff Dummett cannot establish an injury-in-fact in this case.

Speaking on John Dummett’s write-in campaign for President filed a day after the defense argument that he would not likely face Obama as a Republican nominee as he ran in that party the court said:

Plaintiff Dummett’s certificate only came into existence after Defendants filed their reply brief. The introduction of a new argument with new evidentiary support would likely require that Defendants be given the opportunity to respond. Third, even if the Court considered the certificate, the exhibit on its face does not indicate that Plaintiff Dummett will actually be a write-in candidate simply by filing the certificate or whether other steps are required to establish his status. It is not clear then that the certificate proves that Plaintiff Dummett will face the President in general election. Finally, the exhibit is curiously dated the day after Defendants filed their reply, giving the appearance that the certificate is a device to cure whatever standing problems Plaintiffs may have. At this point in the proceedings, Plaintiffs have not properly brought that issue before the Court. For all of these reasons, Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File a Supplemental Response is DENIED.

Now I bring these cases up not to belittle the hard work that went into them, nor the desire to see the Constitution upheld, for I feel these cases had that intent, but I bring them up to point out the complete difference that is represented in my case to the U.S. Supreme Court case with the direct competition between Obama and I in the Democratic Party for the nomination, and the complete disregard I have received from getting on the Ballots from the Democratic Chairmen’s bias towards Obama who I have shown is ineligible to be represented to the Secretary of States as eligible.
Indeed it’s a fraud in my mind to represent one candidate in the Democratic Party as the potential nominee who is voted for and recommended to use the States primary funds collected from tax payers in the actions of voting for him when he is ineligible for the Office of the President.

Indeed my campaign has represented itself competitive as say Mitt Romney’s on the internet with over 160 campaign commercials and videos, a blog with near 200 entries, a maintained web site with some 100 pages and campaign contributions coming in from near half the states. My campaign started the week before Gov. Rick Perry got into the Republican Campaign for president just to let you know how long it’s been around, and how long it’s lasted.

Anyone who discounts the time and effort and money and sacrifice that has gone into my campaign ought to just itemize themselves my campaign using estimates of the Republican Candidates side for what they had as far as the campaign items I’ve mentioned. I think one of the least of these was former Gov. and China Ambassador John Huntsman’s who was into it over 11 million dollars before he resigned his campaign- Santorum near 18.7 million and Paul 35 million-

http://money.cnn.com/2012/04/25/news/economy/Romney-campaign-spending-vote/index.htm


These campaigns, all of them didn’t come close to challenging Obama directly as mine does now. So what will the U.S. Supreme Court do? It's anyone's guess but they sure wouldn't have to release any decision on Obamacare if they find he is not an eligible person qualified for the Office of the President and certainly could not sign any law.

That is why my case ought to take precedence over their deliberation of Obama care and they ought to immediately set up a time and schedule to hear my case.



Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us

www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

www.youtube.com/user/CODE4PRES

www.facebook.com/CODE4PRES


Just as an add I wanted to put the link up of Esq. Larry Klayman's proposed Order denying the Motions to Dismiss which I thought was very informative, professional, and thorough.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/98311427/FL-Voeltz-2012-06-25-Voeltz-Proposed-Memorandum-Order#page=23

5 BULLET POINTS OF CODY'S SUPREME COURT CASE IN GEORGIA

5 BULLET POINTS' OF CODY'S SUPREME COURT CASE IN GEORGIA


WHAT WAS CODY ROBERT JUDY’S STAND IN GEORGIA SUPREME COURT ABOUT?

From Georgia on my mind to DC, where goes the money?

The question deserves some consideration as nearly over 100+ cases on Obama’s eligibility have been brought to Court. Some assert more than 400 cases have been brought on or surrounding Barack Obama’s eligibility.

Leading in this effort is Obama Ballot Challenge found here at www.ObamaBallotChallenge.com , which has been spear-heading a national effort to bring Obama’s eligibility front and center within each and every one of the fifty States in the Union, according to the demands of our Constitution for the Office of the President.

Two of the leaders in ObamaBallotChallenge , retired army Captain Pamela Barnett and Leader in the Ventura County California Tea Party George Miller recently were featured on the Hagmann & Hagmann Show here about work being done at Obama Ballot Challenge. http://www.blogtalkradio.com/cfp-radio/2012/06/23/the-hagmann-hagmann-report

I was a part of the first Ballot Challenge in New Hampshire which went to the Supreme Court of New Hampshire, and also one in Georgia that has recently been denied in the Georgia Supreme Court. In an interest of my case I was asked by Pamela and George to outline a few bullet points of my case just so people could get an idea of what it was about.

It is very important to realize right now that between jurisdiction, standing, and statute all the cases have been dismissed. In a recent pending case in Florida Voltz v. Obama, which has gained a lot of press due to it being heard Monday June 18th,2012, and of course the Judge Terry Lewis who oversaw Bush v. Core, and famous plaintiff representative Larry Klayman, a discussion of ‘standing’ takes place, but from a different perspective.

Rather than harm to the plaintiff Voltz , because he is not a presidential candidate deemed to have standing, the question has shifted to wither the Primary elected anyone to the particular party in question. The answer is ‘no’. Barack Obama has not been elected as the Democratic Party nominee because the nominee for the Democratic Party isn’t officially elected until the National Convention.

In watching the hearing with Esq. Larry Klayman leading the charge, there was no doubt that an expert was at the stand. Judge Terry Lewis has asked both the plaintiff and defendants counsel to submit proposed orders this coming Monday.

The problem with the Ballot Challenges is that Citizens bringing those do have ‘standing’ to bring the challenge to the State executive court, but may not have ‘standing’ to fulfill all the requirements of the standing doctrine in order to stop a party from submitting the parties preference simply because the submitted name has not become the official party nominee.

Presidential Candidates standing is without question, because from the time of the race to the end of the race contributions and publicity drive the success into a campaign without which campaigns close shop. So it’s an easy call for a Presidential Candidate to assert his competitors weaknesses including not being qualified to enter the race by the demands of the Constitution, but what about the general citizens?

The delegates selected from each State have heretofore been charged, as we understood, with voting at the National Conventions for the presidential candidate who won the State Primary assumed to be the candidate with the most votes in the Primary, selected by the general population voting for the candidate.

In this respect the general population felt like their vote counted at their preferred Party Primaries, and the delegates were simply the carriers of the message. Recently however a shift is being felt away from the general populations preferred candidate to the delegate’s favorite candidate. “What?”, you say.

As an example, on the Republican side 140 delegates who were presumably chosen to represent their State’s wishes in California have sued to have their votes unbound from Mitt Romney because they wanted to vote for Ron Paul.

They make the claim that the Republican Party leadership in their States have wronged them unfairly in the selection of Mitt Romney. So you can see the Delegates want a mind of their own in both parties. This then begs the question what about the general population actually being able to feel or understand their vote counts in a Primary? Remember primaries are not sponsored by the political parties, but rather are paid for by State Funds from the pool of all tax payers.

Basically, the population is being regulated out of any vote, and taxed for every dollar used. You begin to understand a concept of ‘taxation without representation here’ if you ask me. One thing that has indeed been very prevalent in the Judge’s comments summarily in these Ballot challenges is the ‘general population’ doesn’t select the President, but that the electorate does, and that means the delegates.

The Judges do not trace the delegates chosen or tied to the general population’s vote in the primary, or the general population’s taxes paying for the primary. Of course there are advantages to an electoral vote or delegates counted, but this is not one of them.

Here we have a few delegates along with State party leadership wanting to decide upon their best calculated interest who should be their nominee. The mentality suggests that the general public doesn’t have a clue which candidate is best.

Basically usurpation begins here, and has even entered the realm of the parties selecting unqualified candidates or in other words usurping the Constitution’s demands articulating the qualifications for the offices.

As candidates gain steam and contributions through the primaries, one can see a ‘run-away train’ formulating with no Constitutional stops whatsoever to rein in the usurpation of our elections, and through the elections the fabric of our United States Constitution that is being shredded into split-ends.

The issue that is in question because every single State Ballot Challenge has been dismissed thus far, is whether the Judicial Branch is recognizing that ‘standing’, or if they are deferring to a ‘standing’ that is articulated by the Federal Court of Appeals definition we have been given by opinion in the 9th Circuit that only Presidential Candidates could really be harmed and show ‘standing’ from another candidate who was receiving contributions and running as an ineligible candidate?

This is one of the reasons that my case is in fact a little different from a Candidate’s perspective who has standing. Again very briefly standing includes 3 elements we all need to remember very clearly so we can support that which the Courts say has credibility.
There are three standing requirements:
1. Injury: The plaintiff must have suffered or imminently will suffer injury—an invasion of a legally protected interest that is concrete and particularized. The injury must be actual or imminent, distinct and palpable, not abstract. This injury could be economic as well as non-economic.
2. Causation: There must be a causal connection between the injury and the conduct complained of, so that the injury is fairly traceable to the challenged action of the defendant and not the result of the independent action of some third party who is not before the court.
3. Redressability: It must be likely, as opposed to merely speculative, that a favorable court decision will redress the injury.[

Now briefly to address the question from George and Pamela to me on some of the major bullets of my action as a Candidate for President in the Democratic Party attempting to disqualify Obama as unqualified as a natural born citizen and thus ineligible:

1- Whether the major parties had a responsibility towards assuring 'eligible candidates' for President based on the contingency they were using "State Funds" for the Primaries?

2- The Party's claim freedom from States on Candidate selection with association clauses and freedom of speech, however, what about when that conflicts with Constitutional requirements for Office?

3- Same argument applies for the responsibility of Secretaries of State's in vetting candidates, and receiving names from the Parties, as they swear oaths to the Constitution are they responsible for vetting based on taxes allocated to State Primaries?

4- Whether a Obama is eligible as a Natural Born Citizen as a Candidate for the 2012 election, with probably cause set forth of fraud and forgery in a Sheriff's investigation submitted from a Candidate with Standing who is a 'natural born citizen' and is legally qualified?

5- Whether the FEC (Federal Election Commission) should knowing a candidate is not qualified, allow them to run for office and collect a single dollar, which by all intensive purpose is a Federal Agency keep the books for fraudulent actions as candidates not eligible by the demands of the Constitution are actively representing themselves as eligible for office to your grandmother and everyone else who trust if a candidates running he’s at least qualified?

This amounts to sponsored fraud upon those who unknowingly contribute to an ineligible candidate who in no way is going to be able to be voted for legally. How does everyone feel about their vote being unwittingly cast for a candidate who is constitutionally unqualified?

Well, everyone who voted in 2008 ought to have an answer because in my book neither Obama nor McCain was qualified and I said as much in my law suits.

McCain isn’t running this time around, so by default, Obama has inherited the continued constitutional crisis of his lie that he was indeed a natural born citizen as he attested to in his Candidate Declaration.

With the dismissal in the Georgia Supreme Court given without opinion we are still left guessing if the Georgia Supreme Court really beliefs its a Federal issue and is delegating that issue to a U.S. Supreme Court Writ that I will of course be fast tracking to them.





Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube- www.youtube.com/user/CODE4PRES
Facebook- www.facebook.com/CODE4PRES

Cody Robert Judy Comments about Florida Ballot Hearing

Did you know that lawyers for Florida Republican Govenor Rick Scott joined with Obama lawyers to fight the eligibility challenge in Florida?


http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/06/18/2855160/florida-judge-hearing-obama-ballot.html#storylink=cpy


Wow! Unreal.. you know I was thinking about calling Larry Klaymen up and telling him,' you know if you case gets dismissed and you don't have a Presidential Candidate preferably in the same party your case won't meet the criteria of "standing' as soon as you enter a 'Judicial Branch Court' so says the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals', and see if he would like to put me on an 'amended complaint' if the Judge gave him that leeway.

Comments I made about the hearing from WND's article here:

http://www.wnd.com/2012/06/obama-attorneys-argue-hes-not-dem-nominee/

1- Any law conflicting with the order of Supreme Law of the Land, U.S.C. is by its nature un-constitutional, more especially dealing with the right of the people to vote in the Primary and for the Delegates to be bound to the People's wishes by their vote. That's exactly why anything Obama signed is 'moot', he's not an eligible candidate, he is not an eligible person in office, that's what usurpation means. He needs to be removed from the White House on the 14 Amendment's clause of a 'Disability' in Sect. 3.

2- 'I know the eligibility question has been argued with the Briefs pretty well, and its not really necessary to argue in Court unless the Judge is asking questions. Argument in Court really plays to the "key" issue hanging the Motion to Dismiss out for a decision. If its denied, further deliberations on the merit might go ahead along with 'discovery'. So Klaymen was a little 'controlled' in his argument of the 'purpose' of the hearing. However, I do think he failed in pointing out the money trail to the Democratic Party sponsored by the State tax payers. And that is that State voters are 'paying' for the primary results and process, so that burdens the Democratic Party to adhering to a qualified candidate by the Constitution. Any political party participating in any form of State procedure is using tax payer money, so is at least obligated to adhere to eligibility requirements. That is why the SOS is obligated!"

3- "No decision was announced immediately. The judge said he would review the law, but he had pointed questions for both sides. He asked Klayman about the presidential eligibility of a person who is born in the U.S. to two U.S. citizens, but the parents later emigrate to Israel." .. Klayman could have followed up with the other requirement here, and "14 years a resident", but he missed the slam dunk.

4- The biggest problem Klaymen did allude to briefly was that its a "shell game" I believe was the term he used. Obama's strategy exist, and counts on shoving the argument down stream. The reasons' are obvious: 1)Less contention exist when Parties want to be seen as co-hesive for the general public viewing them at the National Conventions. They don't want 'war on the floor'. 2) Again, Money.. the more a candidate has been contributed to the more appealing. Ride the coat-tails of a winner theory. 3) The Courts then become subject to a less talked about doctrine called, "The Political Doctrine Question" where the Judicial Courts arbitrarily resign themselves to not confounding the Peoples wishes. Obama knows this one very well and has already thrown it as red tomatoes at the U.S. Supreme Court Justices over the Obama care hearings. The concept however was not meant to impede our Judicial Branch from being a balance in the check and balance of our system where Legislatures can find themselves making a law that is unconstitutional, or the Executive Branch can find itself overstepping the Constitution on law enforcement like privacy issues. That's the role of the Judicial Branch so to will that to a 'bully' through the election process is sickening!

5- If he goes to "Appeal" with his Plaintiff he's done, just like most of the Plaintiffs in Georgia went to the Supreme Court and were denied Application for Review. If by chance mine isn't (Judy v. Obama S12D1584) denied, we will know for sure that you have got to have a presidential candidate and 'standing' is removed from the Ballot Challengers once they enter a Judicial Branch Court from the Administrative Court.

Writing about this might be really good because these attorneys aren't remembering/ getting / employing the lesson that the 9th Circuit taught us.

Klaymen indicated he would go to Appeal no matter what, but how can he see an Appeal winning when a State Judicial Branch Court, is under or lower then say a 9th Circuit Federal Court, and the 'Standing' issue will come into play again just like it has over 100 times. Isn't that enough for these eligibility attorneys to KNOW they are done if the step into a Judicial Court?

I understand there may be Judges in States that don't rule the same way, but when it comes to unseating a guy in the White House, most administrative court Judges are gonna say, "Hey, that belongs to a panel of Judges, not to my shoulders". They aren't gonna want to have the world come tumbling down on them, so what's the motive not to just let the Plaintiff appeal?

The Problem is if they appeal, in the Judicial Branch, we're playing under a different set of rules about 'standing' again.

If that's the case, Klaymen probably won't have time to 'amend' a complaint in Florida before my case is ruled upon by July 1st, Klaymen would have to amend and add me now.



Cody Robert Judy
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
Cody Robert Judy for President 2012
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
Youtube: CODE4PRES
www.facebook.com/CODE4PRES

Flash Fire on Facebook - Game Changer Judy v. Obama GA. Supreme Court

FOR IMMEDIATE PRESS RELEASE:

Just in case you missed it, Bruce Goldwell, founder of The Patriotic American and a best selling author, released these images that are quickly becoming a Facebook flash fire!


700 Shares in less then 22 Hours.
http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=404722959571278&set=a.358918520818389.81790.358905374153037&type=1&theater

Just in time for this image to Kick off..8 hours later..
http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=404991212877786&set=a.358918520818389.81790.358905374153037&type=1&theater

MSM is not going to put this on the 6 O'clock news. The only way your friends will know about this is if you share this post. ..

I (The Patriotic American) spoke personally with Cody Robert Judy about his Court Case in Georgia. He is the first person in America to include the findings of Sheriff Arpaio's Cold Case Posse in his Court Filings. Cody also has STANDING which is something the Courts have said for 3+ years is required for anyone to challenge Obama's eligibility. This could be the "game changer". Paul Revere carried a lantern to signal the British were coming. Cody is carrying the lantern that says American's are coming. It's up to us to help him hold the lantern high. SHARE THIS POST.

The links for Cody's Court Case are on this blog post:

http://brucegoldwell.blogspot.com/2012/06/obama-could-get-knocked-off-georgia.html

Cody Robert Judy is making a stand for Freedom. Let as many people as you can know about this. This could finally be the end of a horrible nightmare for America. Let's hope so.

www.codyjudy.us

www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODE4PRES

Link to Georgia Supreme Court Case:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/95503922/Judy-v-Obama-Discretionary-Application-for-Review-Georgia-Supreme-Court

Press Release: Judy v. Obama Georgia Supreme Court being Docketed June 7th,2012

FOR IMMEDIATE PRESS RELEASE:


Three Bullet Points:

1) Cody Robert Judy v. Barack Hussein Obama has been docketed in the Georgia Supreme Court Case No. S12D1584

2) Within the Application for Review is Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse which concluded there is probable cause that Obama’s long form birth certificate released by Obama is a forged document as well as Obama’s selective service draft registration.

3) With the three questions asked in the Supreme Court Application the Justices will have a candidate with standing, asking about the precedent of the U.S. Supreme Court on ‘natural born citizen’ and the ground work that a denial basically sets starts precedent for a release of anyone who has committed fraud or forgery.
The questions asked a Supreme Court are not to be taken lightly. They involve deep rooted issues that often affect each and every person and touch families in the living room.


Our United States Constitution is a document that is considered whole. In other words, deconstruction of any one part of it is a violation of precedent and the rules of construction. In laymen’s terms you can’t start withdrawing bricks from any wall and expect not to have sirens go off.


De-construction of the Constitution is exactly what Obama subscribes to though and has done so since swearing by oath that he was a “natural born citizen” qualified for the office of the President.


While Court clerks and Secretaries of States’ are the gate keepers, they don’t profess to be able to stand up to someone out right lying to them under oath. That is essentially how Obama has managed his way into the White House since his late summer win over Hillary Clinton in 2008 and subsequent win over Republican Sen. John McCain.
Drawn into the summer, gave Obama a big strategic advantage. Why sue a candidate if he’s not going to be the nominee? Who knows if a challenge should be mounted? I’m sure you get the point. By the time Obama was declared the Democratic Nominee his snowball chance was rolling with loads of cash to protect him from Ballot Challenges in every state, and any Presidential Candidate chances of getting to a Supreme Court that had not already received Obama favors, ie Sen. John McCain’s Sen. Res. 511 declaring the Panama son an American ‘natural born citizen’, co-chaired by Obama, was left to write-in candidates or third party candidates.


In 2011 the 9th Circuit Court of appeals ruled that Presidential candidates have standing, but those challenging in 2008 didn’t seem to be running in 2012, so couldn’t claim continued damages. Retrospective damage was dismissed by the Court in the ruling of Barnett v. Obama.


2012 dawns a new light. While the Birther movement has continually been scalded by the media and stung as fringe, the true sting is an assault upon the qualification of the President to hold office demanded by the Constitution which is as was said not a document that invites further construction without a 2/3rd majority of Congress.
The 8-12 challenges to the clause even from the onslaught of Obama’s political career in Illinois outlining the qualifications of the Office of the President in the legislature have all been soundly defeated.
Why main stream media doesn’t champion those defeats in the legislature and accredit the Birther movement to the sound principle championed by the Legislative Branch to Main Street is pretty good writing on the wall that spots a corporate agenda.


Today, June 7th,2012 Cody Robert Judy ( a presidential candidate in the Democratic Party) v. Barack Hussein Obama has been docketed in the Georgia Supreme Court in a application for review. What makes this case so unique is it is brought by a Candidate for President that started at the lowest level – A Ballot Challenge, for the court that means it has roots, and now that is in the highest court of the State of Georgia that ultimately is charged to protect the United States Constitution, things could be different.
You can’t find an Obama eligibility challenge anywhere in 2012 that has a Candidate for President in the same party, coming to the highest Court of the State, with time for their decision to make a difference before the Democrat National Convention in September. Supreme Courts have a reputation of making sure if they do rule on a case that their decision is not moot.


If the prospective of the Occupant of the White House being a total fraud offering forged documents as accrediting his qualification isn’t enough to unhinge your gate and you think Cody’s just spouting his mouth, wait just a minute there’s more. You probably have heard of Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse that consisted of 2200 hours of law enforcement investigation on Obama’s long form birth certificate?
Cody Robert Judy was the first qualified Candidate for the Office of the President to grab hold of that law enforcement investigation with the integrity of upholding the law and on March 2nd,2012 placed that whole investigation into the Superior Court of Georgia’s consideration which now the Supreme Court has as a staggering dismissal on their plate.


A good read of the questions presented to the Supreme Court shows the corner Obama has placed upon Justice in the United States. If the Court hears the case and agrees with precedent, Obama could be placed as a ‘disability’ to the Constitution and Congress could be placed on Notice to act on his removal as a ‘disability’.
If the Supreme Court doesn’t act, legal construction exist to free anyone in the Georgia penal system or for that matter the United States, to be set free sentenced by the law on crimes of fraud or forgery, because what’s good for Obama ought to be good for any prisoner convicted or sentenced by the law, if allowed, Obama skirts. That quandary exists in Cody Robert Judy’s 3rd question to the Justices in Georgia.


Obama’s probability to have it both ways is the sort of non-transparency that has existed from Obama’s first executive order sealing all his documents. Only problem with those executive orders is they are no good unless they are signed by an eligible President under the Constitution.

Stay tuned for more action.

Links to Application Reviews Questions:
1)http://www.scribd.com/doc/95503922/Judy-v-Obama-Discretionary-Application-for-Review-Georgia-Supreme-Court

2- http://www.scribd.com/doc/95205094/Notice-of-Appeal



The Cody Robert Judy for President U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign www.codyjudy.us www.codyjudy.blogspot.com YouTube: CODE4PRES

Breaking Press Release: Cody Robert Judy v. Barack Obama Georgia Supreme Court Review

FOR IMMEDIATE PRESS RELEASE:

Some interesting developments occurring here. Find the 2 attachments also linked here at SCRIBD: Georgia Supreme Court Pictured. Judy v. Obama Discretionary Application for Review in the Georgia Supreme Court 1- http://www.scribd.com/doc/95503922/Judy-v-Obama-Discretionary-Appli... An extension has been offered here that has amounted to an "Amended Notice of Appeal" 2- http://www.scribd.com/doc/95205094/Notice-of-Appeal

Of interesting note: Georgia Supreme Court Justice Nahmias was born in Atlanta on September 11, 1964. He attended Briarcliff High School and was the state's STAR student in 1982. He attended Duke University, where he graduated second in his class and summa cum laude in 1986, and Harvard Law School, where he graduated magna cum laude in 1991 and was an editor of the Harvard Law Review (along with President Barack Obama). I wonder if he will feel to recuse himself?

For the sake of interest I have had a few people ask me already "So, What does this mean? I mean, How is it different from what has been going on?"

That is a good question as with all of the cases not a single one has had any reasonable action and this has led even Obama's camp to gloat that there's been hundreds of challenges filed and they all are garbage. In fact that has become a mantra of Obama supporters and Obama himself in some of the latest campaign commercials that have showed John McCain taking the higher ground then say Mitt Romney because John McCain chastised his supporters harder and Obama would like Mitt Romney to tell Donald Trump to quit blowing his nose on Obama. Here's their Campaign Commercial: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A1Qao_iBNlk For the sake of calling Obama a "good person" McCain is really saying here and now the guy who has blatantly lied, misled, deceived, and fraudulently represented himself to the American People with his long form birth certificate, his draft registration, his social security card, hid every document he could from the general public like his college records his traveling identity visa's, and any authentically genuine form of identification used daily by the general public, is a "good person". Further, Obama want's Romney to take up the mantra and drink the Jim Jones Kool-aid.com farce.

Of course the Media has had a field day with Wolf Blitzer-http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uFDRaqx5dDM and Greta Van Susteren http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/on-the-record/2012/05/30/trump-obama-... both taking swipes with Donald Trump about the issue they called him on. I guess they think if Trump says' he's voting for Mitt Romney, Mitt Romney ought to be able to shut the Donald's mouth? Well, in a nut shell here's what is different. #1 - Obama has won most of the cases because of what's called "standing".

Most of the people bringing the challenges to Obama through the Court were not running for President and didn't have campaigns hurt by Obama's malfeasance against the Constitution's demands for a natural born citizen. Well I'm running as a Democratic Party candidate, I have standing and have been hurt by Obama's willingness to cheat the rules 50 states have agreed is the Supreme Law of the Land.

#2- Its just not me waving my magic wand saying Obama's not a natural born citizen because he's got foreign allegiances to his father, but I have submitted in my complaint 2200 hours of investigations by a cold case posse designated by Sheriff Joe Arpaio. Now whatever you think of Sheriff Joe, the main idea in this was to clear Obama. That didn't happen and in fact the opposite happened. These two working facets are penetrating the Obama Forgery Gate, and unless Supreme Court Justices want to throw the book out of what they are suppose to be about, sooner or later the Obama house of cards is going to come down in a hurry. You know the most dis-concerting thing about this is, its a guy like me, whose really poor, actually fighting for the Constitution while Mitt Romney's got millions and hasn't bothered to look under the carpet, but continues to sweep Obama's fraud under the carpet. That's not the kind of President we need right now. Leaders find ways to lead, and believe it or not, our Constitution created our Economy and made America great. I think most politicians and probably most of the people only care about the economy. Well, if they cared about the economy they'd see its the Constitution of America that made our Economy great. Let's keep it, and get our economy back on track!

Keep you posted on what's happening..here's the latest commercial if you missed it!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RTJkId_GBis&list=UUymbINcxgM2q9H..

Also seen here on Tea Party.org : http://teapartyorg.ning.com/forum/topics/press-release-judy-v-obama-discretionary-application-for-review?xg_source=activity

Please help or assist Cody if you can in this valiant stand for our United States Constitution. He's done this all by himself and needs your help if at all possible. Cody needs help in traveling expenses, postage expenses,printing expenses,and advertising expenses to sure up this challenge as viable. We all on this site hopefully want our U.S. Constitution to remain viable and solvent. Well if no one lends a hand, or would give $3 or $1,500, or $2400 to help a man who has taken a stand for the Constitution and made it this far legally, what exactly are you telling your self, your family, or even your God?

These are indeed tough times. The recession has hurt America. While politicians may disagree on how to fix the economy, hopefully there is one thing we can agree on. Obama is not eligible and is a usurper. If you believe God inspired our Constitution, really believe that, then you have to understand violations have consequences. How many politicians running for President that have stood up for our Constitution in the eligibility requirements have you supported lately? By Word? By Deed? What does your record say to God? (Reflect upon this personally) Its YOUR record to give, just as he gave and inspired our Constitution. There is no doubt that people support what is important to them, however when our priorities become mixed up, everyone does understand how the wind from God's nostrils can "change" your "hope" to your regret. Please consider lending a hand and visiting Cody's website as a Patriot for America and our Constitution.

Sincerely,
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube:CODE4PRES Check out Cody's new single Appropriately Released on Memorial Day 'The Lion's Share'

Update in Atlanta Georgia Superior Court Case on Obama Eligibility Ballot Challenge

UPDATE IN GEORGIA:

From The Post & Email story - Democrat Presidential Candidate Will Proceed with Eligibility Challenge Against Obama
CLAIMS “EXPLOSIVE” INFORMATION
by Sharon Rondeau


Just by way of an update on this action, I received confirmation that the Motion and the Memorandum was received and filed in the Court today!

Thursday, Feb 23, 2012
Mr. Judy,

Today, our office received your Motion to Proceed Pro Se and Supporting Memorandum. The document we received is the original. As I have explained to Mr. Farrar, you must file all pleadings directly with the Clerk of the Superior Court of Fulton County (i.e. an original, hard copy) either by mail or in person. The Court (i.e. the Judge’s office) cannot accept pleadings for filing on your behalf. However, on this one occasion since you are located in Utah, we will take this document downstairs and file it for you. In future, please ensure that all filings are sent directly to the Clerk’s Office.
Thank you,
Elizabeth Baum
Staff Attorney to the Honorable Cynthia D. Wright

This was so nice of Ms. Elizabeth Baum and certainly was appreciated!

I am looking forward to Judge Cynthia D. Wrights actions on this case as Lawdragon, a guide to the nation’s best lawyers and judges, recently selected Judge Wright as one of the 500 Leading Judges in America. The Family Law Section of the State Bar of Georgia presented the 2006 Jack P. Turner Award to Judge Wright for her outstanding contributions and achievement in family law in Georgia. In 2000, Judge Wright also received the Joseph T. Tuggle, Jr. Professionalism Award from the Family Law Section of the State Bar Association of Georgia.

As the 9th most populous State in the Union Georgia we certainly have a lot of votes to be concerned about and I certainly extend my sincere plea for your support and assistance with my campaign for President, in travel expenses and media. I would really love to put a few TV & Radio adds out there in GA.



If there was a time for The Birther Movement to unite I hope that it would be now.

Of course everyone who believes the Constitution should be upheld has an interest in how this shakes out. Of course most people want to be part of a winning team, it’s always interesting how much more money a Candidate for President takes in when he wins a Primary or Caucus.

Granted we haven't won much in The Birther Movement as far as Court Decisions, but I want to instill in you the sober truth, 'We haven't been heard yet' on the merits in a Judicial Court. We should all keep in mind that Courts are discouraged from making rulings on the Constitution that are not ripe, or presented, or proper as far as 'standing' is concerned.

These arguments are good and necessary to wade through though excruciatingly painful. I can attest to that as a litigant since 2008 in multiple cases on the eligibility issue that represented months of work, a drain on my pocketbook, all contributing to loss and divorce in my family.

These are all good reasons that explain why people who ‘lose’ in politic court hearings and campaigns for that matter, don’t often head back in. “To hell with it”, is an answer that everyone has to deal with in their own way I suppose.

When I think about it as it concerns our United States Constitution however, I don’t seem to be able to quit. Just thinking about the liberties and freedoms that I will leave to my children, even though they may not appreciate it, just thinking about that opportunity for them spurs me on.

These are indeed hard lessons to realize and you rationalize that with "hope" that the next battle might be won and that it wasn't all in vein. We certainly recall it was after a series of losses and big defeats that George Washington crossed the Delaware River on Christmas 1776 to surprise the Hessian forces at Trenton New Jersey leading to a whole new recruitment of forces because he had won.

Those men who were with Washington before crossing that icy river knew their efforts were the catalyst for the win. Similarly, and now, those who are helping with this effort should know they are the same as those who have gone on in the face of defeat and so I urge you to contribute to this noble cause.

Those who can help please visit my web site and find the contribution page here:

http://www.codyjudy.us/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htmSincerely,
Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube:CODE4PRES