Monday, October 21, 2013

Will The Alabama Supreme Court Collapse Obama’s House Of Cards or Fall To The Racism Charge?

Will The Alabama Supreme Court Collapse Obama’s House Of Cards or Fall To The Racism Charge?

The frustration that Obama has had the 'race card' to play has been kept alive by Conservatives unwilling to recognize the inequality of say, giving (1* & 2*)McCain a pass to run for President when he was not born in the United States, but throwing a fit about Obama not being born in the U.S. to Citizen parents. There is only one man in the United States of America that actually stood on the principle, ran for President in 2008 and 2012, and socked the principle to both McCain and Obama.

Some may say its hard to do anything in America regarding politics that hasn't been done or is unique to the political arena. However in the case above in the years stated, the distinction of suing Obama and McCain as an official candidate for President belongs to me alone.

That doesn't make my case something Judges can flip off like a light switch in hopes they never saw the criteria they themselves created as a match to indeed challenge Obama's qualification in a game of fulfill-the-criteria-and-we'll -create-a-new-one like rules of a game changing when someone you don't want to win starts to win. Confiscating my individual rights is akin to suspending your own. Who wants to be the first to give up your rights?

That's what the Constitution's for as the Supreme Law of the Land. Remember, "one nation under God indivisible with liberty and justice for all"? I was included in the "all" part of that.

This blog entry contains much of the information related to the following article link below. So if you'r lost to my blog entry comments please refer to this in order of catching the comments in regards to it.

Comment on the above linked article:

I'm not sure why Mr. Thomson, referred to the Georgia case's and Judge Malihi changing his tune, while stating in the same article regarding the Alabama Supreme Court;
".. it will be the first and only civil case in which Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse is personally involved".

Sheriff Joe Arpaio's case results and all involved was inserted with their reputation on the line, into Judy v. Obama 12-5276 at the Georgia Civil Superior Court level March 2nd,2012 and thus appealed to Georgia's Supreme Crt and traveled clear to the U.S. Supreme Court from Malihi's Administrative Court decision.

The importance of this maybe a small detail, however, small details that are missed can be excruciatingly painful in a Court especially in light of the way it may be introduced or re-introduced to the United States Supreme Court if a hearing is indeed desired.

I certainly applaud The Western Center for Journalism for carrying Mr. Thomson's article.

World Net Daily a known media advocate for the Constitution's natural born citizen clause however did not cover:
1)A single story of Judy v. Obama 12-5276 (2012) and (2013) in spite of it coming from a Presidential Candidate with standing in the Presidential Race within the Democratic Party so it was more politically neutral.

2) It being the only case that actually did insert Sheriff Joe's Cold Case Posse results from Georgia as evidence supporting the claim of ineligibility.

3) It based on the 'race neutrality' of Judy v. Obama 12-5276 also having roots in Judy v. McCain in 2008 which no other Presidential Candidate in the nation had claim to.

However, they did a small mention in stories of the case when it was a Georgia Supreme Court case here and here but again without any of the three strengths of the case mentioned above.

While respecting to Mr. Thomson's enthusiasm we need to keep the facts well understood; "What’s been the biggest obstacle in challenging Obama’s eligibility in court? It’s been finding a judge who isn’t afraid to allow the merits of the case against Obama to be argued in court.", is not quite legally right with the majority of cases dismissed for the lack of standing, which according to Obama's own lawyers represented is a claim made by someone in the presidential race or contest.

The tough sell in Alabama could be the exact same problem as we saw with Berg v. Obama in 2008 in the U.S. Supreme Court dismissed on a lack of standing, that I also wrote an Amicus Curiae in support of.

You've heard it a million times: “It’s OK to make a mistake, but never make the same mistake twice!” Or “Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me.” One of the giant myths we love to believe is that we make a mistake only once.

For those conservatives interested in results the biggest problem has yet been combining forces with the strengths of every spoke in the wheel so a case doesn't wobble and fall off track, though it is true that Judges do retain some discretion on what they will hear more especially with pro se litigants and the opportunity for the law to be upheld in justice without being blinded as someone who couldn't see the Forrest for a single tree. They may have upheld "The Standing" argument but they sure let pass the qualifications for the Office of the President brought to them by someone with standing in my cases.

Without the slightest degree of envy or jealousy for credit, I have always stood firm with my hand extended to those brilliant reputable lawyers filing cases as a witness for them if they so chose to accept my invitation. My witness could stand up on the "principle" of the (3*)natural born citizen clause because of my complaint against McCain, who was born in a Panama Hospital not in any military hospital and is a son of Panama in the same fashion as those who stood against Obama for not being born in the U.S. to Citizen parents.

The resulting hesitation to admit such a testimony only stands to solidify what in the Main Stream Media circles will always be a 'racist charge', because in fact there is merit. If Obama is not allowed into the "natural born circle" its plain and simple, McCain should not have been either.


[ If you would like to help Cody Robert Judy in his bid for upholding the Constitution in “America’s Birther Campaign”, or ABC Campaign ,which highlights the United States Constitution with information and education for voters to understand the tough questions politicians should be answering in 2014, and in the coming 2016 election for the Office of the President please make a contributions here: ]

1*-Summation of McCain's not being born in the U.S. or a military hospital

2* Non-binding U.S. Senate Resolution 511 sponsored by Obama and Clinton in a 'good-ole-boys' non-binding resolution which was not at all binding on the Constitution's qualification for the Office of Pres. declared "two citizen parents" necessary however which Obama fails. This was the second ACT of Congress in regards to McCain's identity which is a naturalization process governed by Amend 14, and excludes parameters of a 'natural born citizen'. I don't need 2 acts of Congress first declaring I'm a citizen and then another declaring I'm a natural born citizen. McCain seemed to think he did for some reason.

3* Natural born citizen - Citizen - Native Graphs depictions here and here for those interested.

No comments:

Post a Comment