Showing posts with label Minor v. Happersett. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Minor v. Happersett. Show all posts

Friday, February 8, 2019

CONFESSIONS OF AN AMERICAN PROPHET I Cut Barack Obama's Head Off


CONFESSIONS OF AN AMERICAN PROPHET

I Cut Barack Obama's Head Off



Part I. & II Do You want to be like me? Confessions of an American Prophet who ran for President in 08, 12, and 16 and sued Sen. Barack Obama & Sen. John McCain for not being a natural born Citizen in Federal Court to US Supreme Court Cases 12-5276; 14-9396; Tenth Cir 17-4055. Discussions include Kamala Harris, Hillary Clinton and President Trump.

Part I. https://youtu.be/vMxK4hEriDo
Part II. https://youtu.be/eUBb8793IiA

References:

Minor v. Happersett https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/88/162

Salt Lake City, UT Sam Young - https://protectldschildren.org/about/

Mark 10:17-25 Ezekial 14:9 Isaiah Ch 29:8-11, Ch 53

Kamala Harris https://www.thepostemail.com/2018/08/19/is-kamala-harris-eligible-to-be-president/

Part I.




Part II.



















Wednesday, August 31, 2016

THE CRAZY KOOKn Anti-Birthers who forgot CONGRESS & HILLARY CLINTON were ORIGINALS ?



SPECIAL REPORT


THE CRAZY KOOKn Anti-Birthers 

Who forgot CONGRESS & HILLARY CLINTON 
were ORIGINALS ?
__________________

As the only Official United States Presidential Candidate in America with a bi-partisan Federal Court Record in defending the qualifications of the Office of the President, meaning I challenged McCain and Obama, I am uniquely the recipient of a lot of information that Main Stream Media is covering up or at least feels the American People don't need to know in the general fever of coming Election. 

In the spirit of sharing information I have researched and cited enough information here that both Congress and the Democratic and Republican Candidates for President should indeed get off their high horses in dis-avowing "Birthers" and realize it is indeed a tenant of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA or Americanism.

No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to theAge of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident ...


ANOTHER LIVELY DISCUSSION ON WHY ANTI-BIRTHERS are Kooks. 

CRJ INNITIAL COMMENT
Cody Robert Judy August 31, 2016 at 10:00 am (Quote) #
Anti-Birthers are the biggest conspiracy kooks I’ve ever seen.
The premise begins with Law for Birthers with a real case consideration where the SCOTUS acknowledged in Minor v. Happersett ( no conspiracy exist for those born in the Country to its Citizens for the others Conspiracy exist)
The conspiracy begins with non transparency. No conspiracy exist where there is proof positive or transparency.
Doubt is where conspiracy gains traction, and that is provided by non transparency.
@Bob maintains a conspiracy about my not filling out a forma pauperis Motion correctly rather then presume corruption in the SCOTUS despite evidence I filled out and passed the Motion by two lower Courts on the same case, and 3 other Court’s in the SCOTUS 12-5276 Case of Judy v. Obama.
Obama has a host of Records he’s not been transparent with and his own non transparency served up your own complaints about conspiracy. Duh?
College Records, Marital Records, Divorce Records these are things Obama himself “used’ to get elected.
Making those applications relevant for others but exempting ones self from them is why Obama is the Birther King.


Response-
avatar
Scientist August 31, 2016 at 10:39 am
RE:(Quote) #
(Cody Robert Judy: College Records, Marital Records, Divorce Records these are things Obama himself “used’ to get elected.
Making those applications relevant for others but exempting ones self from them is why Obama is the Birther King.)
[Who the hell ever asked for any of those from any other candidate? All anyone has ever asked for are tax returns from Drumpf, something every candidate in the last 50 years has provided.]


Response-
CRJ
avatar
Cody Robert Judy August 31, 2016 at 10:55 am Re:(Quote) #
(Scientist: Who the hell ever asked for any of those from any other candidate?)
Maybe you could point out to all of us the last POTUS that had a foreign father who was not a [Citizen] at the time of the Adoption of the Constitution?
Maybe you could point out to us why 8 attempts to change the Qualification for Pres failed since 2003 and what exactly they were proposing be changed in the first instance?
Maybe you could point out that in any investigation more than one fact is desired to support a conclusion…? It’s called Calloborating Evidence and wanting it does not make a conspiracy it actually points to exactly the opposite ‘no reasonable doubt”.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corroborating_evidence
Corroborating evidence (or corroboration) is evidence that tends to support a proposition that is already supported by some initial evidence, therefore confirming the proposition. For example, W, a witness, testifies that she saw X drive his automobile into a green car. Meanwhile, Y, another witness, testifies that when he examined X’s car, later that day, he noticed green paint on its fender. There can also be corroborating evidence related to a certain source, such as what makes an author think a certain way due to the evidence that was supplied by witnesses or objects.
This is exactly what Minor v. Happersett pointed out no doubt exist with those born in the Country to its Citizens to the others there are doubts.
You must ask Obama about the divorce records opened up on his opponent Jack Ryan
His 2004 campaign for the Senate, against Barack Obama, received widespread media attention for the disclosure of sealed custody documents stemming from his divorce from actress Jeri Ryan. The unsealing of those documents, detailing allegations that Ryan had pressured his wife to perform sexual acts in public, led to Ryan’s withdrawal from the campaign.
So the short answer to your question is “Obama”


Comment CRJ

Scientist: Barack Obama is not a naturalized citizen so they are not relevant to him.

Obama’s ‘naturalization’ is covered by the powers of ‘naturalization’ given to Congress to define ‘adoption’ rather than ‘natural born Citizen’ which Congress was not given powers to define as it is defined by nature and natures God. That is why you will not see ‘born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents’ in the NATIONALS and CITIZENS at BIRTH TITLE (which is a ACT of Naturalization given Congress by and under the powers of the Constitution)

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1401

8 U.S. Code § 1401 – Nationals and citizens of United States at birth

(a) a person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof;
(e) a person born in an outlying possession of the United States of parents [one of whom is a citizen of the United States who has been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year at any time prior to the birth of such person];

This is where Hillary Clinton, in my opinion, knew as a ‘Birther’ being a co-sponsor of U.S. Sen. Res. 511 that if the matter actually went to Trial, McCain would lose, and by that same admission Obama as (inherited parental citizenship) as well as (Place-soil) was understood to be necessary.

Reference:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/18/us/politics/18web-hulse.html?pagewanted=print&_r=0

[The sponsors include both Democrats vying to be Mr. McCain’s opponent, Senators Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York and Barack Obama of Illinois, as well as Senator Tom Coburn, Republican of Oklahoma.

Of course, the authors acknowledge the resolution would have little real influence were the matter of Mr. McCain’s eligibility hanging by a legal thread. ]

You can call it a paraphrase if you’d like, but in general she knew it was non-binding and did not hold legal weight. This might be the most notorious accomplishment of Hillary Clinton as a senator abrogating to ‘change’ what had been intensely debated.

AND as I’ve referred to many times CONGRESS Conducted Hearings in 2000 hearing witnesses and testimony on the matter and flatly rejected changing it. Here are excerpts regarding the Hearings held before the House Judiciary Committee:

2000
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT TO ALLOW FOREIGN-BORN CITIZENS TO BE PRESIDENT

HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON THE CONSTITUTION OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED SIXTH CONGRESS
SECOND SESSION
ON
H.J.Res. 88
JULY 24, 2000
Serial No. 108
Excerpt 1
”. . . it will require other talents and a different kind of merit to establish him in the esteem and confidence of the whole Union, or of so considerable a portion of it as would be necessary to make him a successful candidate for the distinguished office of president of the United States”—thus writes Alexander Hamilton in Federalist No.68. Indeed, the ”chief magistrate” who is also Commander-in-Chief has to grow from the soil.
Excerpt 2
I came to this Country in 1959, and became a citizen in 1964. During my formative years in Hungary, I read as much American literature as American students might have in the high schools of yore. In my second year of residence, I married a native-born American, and henceforth spoke English exclusively in my home. Before and after taking the oath of citizenship, I have made continuous and extensive efforts to become American, not only in the administrative sense of the word. In the course of my life, spent mostly as a performing artist and academic, I had the opportunity to start a small corporation and run for elective office—both of which are indispensable for the comprehension of America.

My interest in, and commitment to, the principles upon which this Nation was founded prompted me to establish a small Think Tank—called Center for the American Founding—that connects today’s issues with those principles. I write a regular column, and have published a book about American political philosophy. My fellow Americans honor me frequently in word and deed very much as one of their own.

Yet, Mr. Chairman, I wish to state unequivocally that, despite all of the above, I would not consider myself eligible to the office of president of the United States.

The people of this land are possessed of a unique brand of tolerance, a balanced temperament, and a natural goodwill toward the world. While such persons may be found everywhere, they constitute an overwhelming majority among Americans. One of the inexplicable miracles of America is the transformation that occurs within one generation, no matter how different the customs and mores of the new arrivals.

Excerpt 3
In addition, liberty is not simply a blessing guaranteed by the Constitution, but an inner state of being, again separating Americans from most others. An overwhelming majority of immigrants arrive on these shores looking, as they had always done, to government as a source of benefits, and an authority to obey.
Excerpt 4
Those who favor the proposed amendment will no doubt point to exceptional persons of their acquaintance who, in their view, would fulfill any and all expectations with regard to the office of president, though being of foreign birth. Yet the laws of this country never have been written with the exceptions in mind. Among other things, the Framers of the Constitution distinguished themselves by writing few laws, and employing language at once broad and concise, so as to be applicable to all circumstances at all times
Excerpt 5
The original Constitution contemplated a relatively weak presidency, but the office has become the most powerful in the world, and safeguards surrounding it are therefore more indispensable than ever. The one area of presidential authority that is virtually unchecked and uncheckable (despite the War Powers Act and similar efforts) is the president’s power as commander in chief. Can that power be safely entrusted to a foreign-born citizen? John Jay didn’t think so; nor do I; nor I suspect do the vast majority of Americans.

Let us consider a few scenarios. Start with an extreme example. The espionage agencies of a number of countries, doubtless including the United States, have sometimes employed what in the spy novel is called an agent under deep cover. A young person is thoroughly trained and indoctrinated before being sent to an enemy country, where he or she becomes a citizen and an exemplar of respectable behavior. This goes on for years, even decades, until the parent agency determines that it is time to activate the agent. It is not difficult to imagine such a person obtaining an office of great trust. But a Senator is one of 100, and a Representative is one of 435. What check is there on the president who is one of one, except for the constitutional restriction?

Should that seem too remote a possibility, consider a more likely case. A person comes to America from country ”X” as a young man, takes out citizenship, become thoroughly Americanized, and is as loyal to his adopted country as can be. Nonetheless, in dealing with his original country he is bound to be influenced by his nativity, whether in the form of hostility or favoritism. Even should he prove able to rise above his prejudices and deal with the old country objectively, he would still be widely regarded as prejudiced, and the media would fan such suspicions. As commander in chief, it is not enough to be above reproach, one must be above the suspicion of reproach.

Let me cite a more tangible example, one closer to recent experience. We all know a number of Cuban-Americans. They are loyal to our country, now their country too. They are pillars of their communities and are more fiercely patriotic than most natural born Americans. And yet, as the recent to-do over Elian Gonzalez demonstrated, few of them are able to regard Cuba dispassionately or treat relations with Castro’s Cuba with equanimity. Suppose we had had a Cuban-born president in the White House at the time of the Gonzalez controversy. Would that president have been able to retain objectivity and, as importantly, any shred of credibility under the circumstances?

In conclusion let me say that on this as on other constitutional questions, we are best guided by the wisdom and prudence of the Founding Fathers. The amendment process is not to be taken lightly, nor should it be used for political or electioneering purposes. The structure created by the Constitution has stood the test of time and continues to stand as the truest foundation for our freedom
Excerpt 6
Mr. VAZSONYI. I would not only agree in general, I would also cite a letter written by Thomas Jefferson, I believe, in 1820, in which he says very clearly that all confidence must be in the American people, who are the only repositories of a safe future.

But I also believe that political events can be influenced, and it is not unthinkable for a foreign power, especially for a foreign power, perhaps I am going to cite China, a country with an extremely long-term view of history, to arrange things perhaps on a 50-year plan to install someone on American soil and really hope to be able to run for that office and put the necessary strength behind it.

End

I mean you can call Birthers whatever you want, but ultimately as far as the Legislature goes, there’s been no change to the qualification being ‘born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents’ as a definitive of [natural born Citizen]

July 9, 2008

Arizona Legal Studies Discussion Paper No. 08-14

Abstract:
Senator McCain was born in 1936 in the Canal Zone to U.S. citizen parents. The Canal Zone was territory controlled by the United States, but it was not incorporated into the Union. As requested by Senator McCain’s campaign, distinguished constitutional lawyers Laurence Tribe and Theodore Olson examined the law and issued a detailed opinion offering two reasons that Senator McCain was a natural born citizen. Neither is sound under current law. The Tribe-Olson Opinion suggests that the Canal Zone, then under exclusive U.S. jurisdiction, may have been covered by the Fourteenth Amendment’s grant of citizenship to “all persons born . . . in the United States.” However, in the Insular Cases, the Supreme Court held that “unincorporated territories” were not part of the United States for constitutional purposes. Accordingly, many decisions hold that persons born in unincorporated territories are not Fourteenth Amendment citizens. The Tribe-Olson Opinion also suggests that Senator McCain obtained citizenship by statute. However, the only statute in effect in 1936 did not cover the Canal Zone. Recognizing the gap, in 1937, Congress passed a citizenship law applicable only to the Canal Zone, granting Senator McCain citizenship, but eleven months too late for him to be a citizen at birth. Because Senator John McCain was not a citizen at birth, he is not a “natural born Citizen” and thus is not “eligible to the Office of President” under the Constitution.

Keywords: John McCain, Canal Zone, citizenship, naturalization, natural born citizen, president, presidential eligibility
JEL Classifications: K33
Working Paper Series

You know I had forgotten that Obama had assisted Tribe as a Clerk at Harvard, but that is true. Of course Tribe’s Paper was an assist for Obama and Tribe was the Democratic Part of the supposed bi-partisan paper McCain got to stump for him.


The “Congressional” Natural Born Citizen Part I : A ‘Tribe’-ute to DC Liberal Activism … Laurence Tribe is the co-founder of the liberal activist “American Constitution Society”, … While studying at Harvard, Obama became a research assistant to Tribe on his … Recognizing that John Sidney McCain, III, is a natural born citizen.

While studying at Harvard, Obama became a research assistant to Tribe on his book – “Abortion: The Clash of Absolutes” (1990) and in turn, during Obama’s candidacy, Tribe did a political commercial congratulating Obama and publicly supporting the Obama campaign.


Post Note: Another source  of Hillary Clinton's Birther Campaign stand was recently featured in the Washington Post and Brietbart I will cite here with the interest that if Mr. Trump is responsible for his supporters then Hillary Clinton must be responsible for hers too, that means now and in 2008.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2015/09/26/washington-post-confirms-hillary-clinton-started-the-birther-movement/

CRJ


WE STILL NEED YOUR HELP! Exposing corruption is not easy and as someone  who has standing to stand up in this type of Government Corruption Cody Robert Judy still needs your help.


Help Us Now  Contribute to the Campaign!
CRJ

Thank You!


Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy Campaign
Cody Robert Judy



Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.


Web Site www.codyjudy.us
Keep coming back!


INSPIRING - I believe in You


Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!


Friday, April 29, 2016

A SPECIAL REPORT: WOMEN - WE are The Majority - Sacrificing Choice, Innocence, & Our Children's Futures

 A SPECIAL REPORT 
___________________
 WOMEN - WE are The Majority -

Sacrificing Choice, Innocence, & Our Children's Future
________________________________


The thought occurred to me that woman are not acting like a Minority in defending the United States Constitution. Our Republic under the U.S.Constitution is designed to respect individual rights. The U.S. Constitution protects Individual rights in a synopsis the Minority is able to stand up against the Majority when specific rights are trampled. Because of the 19th Amendment that gave Citizen's suffrage without regard to sex, sometimes we think of women more as a minority needing these protections adopted in the Constitution.
I've been careening my head and wrestling about the dismal support in general of Woman for the [natural born Citizen] qualification for the Office of President. ie. Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents for some two weeks now. Scratching my head at this and trying to understand it because on the outset women have a great interest in protecting their children in a natural instinct of 'nurturing' that I think should be very friendly to this Core Protection in the Constitution.

Additionally, women very much in a Civil understanding have more experience of being treated as weaker sex, not being allowed to vote, being shunned for divorce or not being given a Choice in many instances of history in the reproductive rights, which should engender a defense for the protections of the U.S. Constitution especially at the Core of it in the Office of President.

This however has not translated into support either by Contributions or readership for which I've scratched my head about until the question was formed: Why? Why aren't woman acting like a Minority any more? And the answer is because they just aren't. The laws have been changed to favor them in almost every perspective and as it happens often the majority gets complacent with their rights because they begin taking them for granted. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has no doubt made great strides in achieving office and made unprecedented roads towards the Office of the President, but she's also made unprecedented roads in sacrificing the Principles of that Office by not challenging Obama's ineligibility which has in fact lead to everything we are going through now that is panning out like a golden road to disaster.

Women's choices are protected in most aspects. They can get divorced and file such as a Majority, most always getting favor in property which also might be parallel the majority filing. There's no CIVIL office they are prohibited from based on gender. They can vote. Minimum wage is the same for both genders.

So what's this thing in my head about so little respect for supporting the Constitution especially surrounding the Office of President in the concern for national security via children and weaknesses in vulnerability of gender in a Minority position?

Well, as I researched this I found the facts don't lie. Woman are a Majority and as such are, I believe, slipping into a complacency of their Constitutional Rights afforded and protected by the U.S. Constitution in their voting block faster then they even can comprehend; even whilst Hillary Clinton is promising the world to women they actually already have it as a Majority.

Perhaps in the hope that the FBI does not handle her choice to change the Computer Server of the U.S. Federal Government to her own private server in the official conduct of Secretary of State? No doubt, the U.S. Government might have something to say about changing their server, but she didn't ask, she just made that decision and I don't think it was in the interest of FOIA or serving the people in a responsibility of that office.Yes, its true women are the Majority.

With the exception of Alaska and North Dakota women are the Majority or equal in every State of the Union and Men are the Minority. Tossing the States whose population is equal, Women are a Majority in the Majority of States.

State by State Gender 2014 Population Distribution http://kff.org/other/state-indicator/distribution-by-gender/
FEATURED number of Women in Congress from 2008 to 2016



So my hunch was correct. Women are more to blame as the irresponsible voting block for our National Security breach in the Office of the President. In 2012 Mitt Romney lost the women's vote by 12 points, the largest ever since recording started in 1952 and despite winning the men's vote by 8 points lost the election by 2 points.

Make no mistake about it as an ineligible person in the Office of President has shown  more favorable to open borders that most harmfully leans on women's innocence & children 37%  of all federal crimes in 2014, ruining the American way of life as far as prosperity loading 10 Trillion of 20 on the backs of their children effectively adding 70K/person during the last eight years which is generational theft, favoring weapons sales to Muslim Theocratically Controlled Countries that support Sharia Law that is a known [subjectification of women] in philosophy. Four F16 Fighters, 200 Abrams Tanks [given] to Egypt Muslim Brotherhood, Iran Nuclear Deal releases 100 Billion,  Saudi Arabia 46 Billion, in fact "the volume of major deals concluded by the Obama administration in its first five years [exceeds] the amount approved by the Bush administration in its full eight years in office by nearly $30 billion. That also means that the Obama administration has approved more arms sales than any U.S. administration since World War II."

Of course the Office of the President or person in it cannot be blamed for every kidnapping, every rape, robbery, stabbing shooting or atrocity, however the choice in that Office is indeed responsible for a general course of action that must be weighed in the balance of good for or against the U.S. Picture a ship in the ocean smooth sailing on one side and shark invested waters on the other in the distance - which do you hope to drift toward with the rudder for a nice afternoon swim?

The President signs every Bill passed by the Legislature- Obamacare was one of those needing a qualified President's signature that encapsulated 1/5 of the entire economy. The Office of the President Directs and Commands nearly every turn of the Military and Border Security General Principle of our Nation. It's near impossible to say the Character of a person in that Office is not affected by Place and both Parents, which should be in the BIGGEST agreement with women as mothers.

It also just so happens to be the only Office in our Government requiring the unique qualification of born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents - [ natural born Citizen] and in the United States Supreme Court the defining articulation in Case, Minor v. Happersett [No Doubt] those born in the Country of Parents who are Citizens of it are [natural born Citizens].

[At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or [natural-born citizens], as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their [p168] parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first.]

Oh the irony of the [United States Supreme Court Case] and Decision that defined [natural born Citizen] actually being on behalf of a women-  Mrs. Virginia Minor, a native born, free, white citizen of the United States, and of the State of Missouri, over the age of twenty-one years, wishing to vote for electors for President and Vice-President of the United States, and for a representative in Congress, and for other officers, at the general election held in November, 1872, applied to one Happersett, the registrar of voters, to register her as a lawful voter, which he refused to do, assigning for cause that she was not a "male citizen of the United States," but a woman. She thereupon sued him in one of the inferior State courts of Missouri, for willfully refusing to place her name upon the list of registered voters, by which refusal she was deprived of her right to vote.

So it is a Great Burden of women that they as a Majority have and are sacrificing what is most precious to them., their children and innocence by their confirmation of a Majority and their slothful diligence to these precious Principles.

A Contemporary Understanding of two verses in ISAIAH
The circumstances are very difficult indeed for me to make this egregious report owning to my own heart naturally drawn out to protect women most natural and instinctive, but that protection cannot come  or be placed upon me as to be my own dereliction accept by my silence.

I noticed in the collection of contributions for my own presidential campaign nearly five to one were from males compared to females. 

What can we say after realizing this? Maybe we were not hard enough on you? Maybe we did not teach it well enough? Women today make up half of the entire professional and technical work force in the United States.

Yet men still dominate in political contributions . More women vote, but only about 30% of big donors contributing are women. Understanding this takes on some relevant features such as opinions may stretch:
ie. [ It’s not that women are less willing or less able to give in general. Despite the wage gap, women, across a variety of demographic variables, are more likely to give to charity than men are. Politics is the outlier, with men’s giving outnumbering women’s. A philanthropy researcher offers an explanation: “They give out of more empathetic and altruistic reasons than men do,” said Debra Mesch, the director of the Women’s Philanthropy Institute at the Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy. “Women may not feel that their money in the political arena is going to fulfill those motivations.”]

What?! Really? If women didn't feel that their money in the political arena was going to fulfill those motivations - in reference to empathetic and altruistic motivations of giving, why do more women vote than men? They obviously feel a responsibility to the voting booth. If women have failed to give in Political Campaigns I believe it's because they have not been educated to the direct link in the generals of the three things we have discussed, or.. well let's get to it.

1-The importance of the Constitution in their rights as individuals; 2- crime upon the innocents that can be given a deferred prosecution status allowed by law in the Executive Commander-In-Chief position in not enforcing borders and laws, and 3- the basics of responsibility to balancing a check book for the safety of our future generations as it pertains to our National Debt and the importance of delaying gratification in the spending department.

That's right 66% of women are carrying credit card debt compared to 33% of men. [ Stick to a budget. The easiest way to avoid credit card debt – regardless of your age or gender – is to create and stick to a budget. At the beginning of the month, decide how you’ll spend your money, and stick to it.]

Let's pose the question for women. You can get the belt and those matching accessory earrings  to that outfit or send $25 dollars to your favorite Presidential Candidate which one is more important to you?

Ask the same question to men. You can get the more expensive balls and walk for a round of golf instead of riding or send $25 dollars to your favorite Presidential Candidate?

What I'm trying to point out here is that women have so much more to lose in my biased male opinion that it is beyond making any sense for them to sacrifice one single line of the Constitution, and if they were to sacrifice a line the one of most value and importance to their rights and the safety of their children in indeed is the one I am protecting and standing up for. I am the only one in America to have a Federal Court Record in protecting and standing up for it in Judy v. McCain and Judy v. Obama in the U.S. Supreme Court. A women's world is the quickest one to change as it was the hardest one to get where they have finally gotten to in America and in the Office of the President can that world change the fastest and most dramatically with an ineligible person.

Now you might be saying to yourself that any money you send to me is a waste because of this or that. That's just bull.  If women get together and send me half of what ineligible Ted Cruz has been sent the Politicians in Washington DC will faint!!! Congress would real!!! and I'm thinking we could move the world in ways you have no idea we could, but the most important factors would be those three we discussed.
1- Safety 2- Crime & 3- National Debt -which could very easily lead to WWWIII slaying millions of your sons and daughters and leaving a lot of blood on your hands. No it's not a joking matter.

In my humble service to you, I haven't made a dime in the last 7 years and 15 Cases of law because I've felt it was so important. I hope you know it doesn't make a bit of sense for me to come here and to cuss you out and make you feel bad for not supporting me with contributions in order to get contributions. In this I agree, but in my motivation for doing and delivering the message I have to say it is indeed your Heavenly Father who has seen this and my interest is not in seeing how much or how many contributions I can get, because that is far from the main point of my relaying the message.

 What you do with it is between you and God. I had the courage and love to deliver it.

Let it not come to haunt me in my Eternal Judgement that my care, concern, and love for you my sisters in the USA was not a very high priority. I can only say., please please.. Repent of this which means change your course now. Do not let your hands be bloodied by your own children in this. It is an eternal regret that would be very difficult to bear. To have done harm to the ones you said you loved creates a very hot hell of regret that just a little effort now on your part can soothe in a big way. I hope you will take advantage of that now.

May God Bless You for that courage and may any contributions you make be seen as your sincere protection and interest for those little ones and the Rights you have, as something I am very weak in understanding but whom I trust God knows much better than I- Women. I certainly hope you receive this as as matter of great respect that I have for you.

Sincerely,
CRJ

Here's the Link to Contribute if you'd like to Cody's Campaign improve your record for Taking A Stand for the Constitution.
 www.codyjudy.us


Thank You!


Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy Campaign
Cody Robert Judy



Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.

Web Site www.codyjudy.us
Keep coming back!


INSPIRING - I believe in You


Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!





Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION


1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts

12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial

13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008

14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case

15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.


















































Friday, September 11, 2015

The New 911 Call For Help America Sends Out- LEADERSHIP


The New 911 Call For Help America Sends Out

Today marks the Remembrance of the tragedies we as a Nation have suffered on 9-11, symbolic of a 911 call for help in both 2001 when tragically 5,000 Americans died you can remember in this 18 minute video of what started out a normal day and ended with the Twin Towers coming down  as well as terrorist attacks  2012 leading  in the death of those at Benghazi.

It certainly strikes at the heart of those living as we recall those lives lost in the solemn recognition of President Thomas Jefferson's 1787 quote rehearsed at American Creation  made in a letter while he was living in France asserting the rights of people to rebel against government when it had devolved into a tyranny in his own advocacy for civil dialogue:

The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots & tyrants. 
It is it's natural manure."



CLINTON'S APOLOGY TOUR CONTINUES - 
THIS TIME ON BEHALF OF HER SELF AND NOT THE USA

Look at far Hillary Clinton has come.  As a young aspiring lawyer she was let go without a letter of accommodation for actually advocating and objecting to President Richard Nixon being able to be represented by a lawyer after she had agreed not to engage in changing the Judicial Committee rules according to a recent *2014 story carried on FOX NATION from **Hotair in 2008 "*“Because she was a liar,” Zeifman said in an interview last week. “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality." **"Hillary assured me that she had not drafted, and would not advocate, any such rules changes. However, as documented in my personal diary, I soon learned that she had lied. She had already drafted changes, and continued to advocate them. In one written legal memorandum, she advocated denying President Nixon representation by counsel. In so doing she  simply ingnored the fact that in the committee's then more recent prior impeachment proceeding, the committee had afforded the right to counsel to Supreme Court Justice William O Douglas.”  "

Apposing Zeifman's account we find at Snopes ""in April [1974], Rodino began recommending that we deny Nixon the right to be represented by counsel". (Whether such a "right" existed is far from certain: the committee was engaged in neither a criminal proceeding nor an impeachment trial; they were merely investigating whether grounds for impeachment might be present.) Accordingly, Hillary drafted a brief in support of Rodino's position under orders from her supervisor, John Doar. One might assert, as Chief Minority Counsel Frank Polk did, that Hillary could have taken a better approach to the task and "should have mentioned [the Douglas case], and then tried to argue whether that was a change of policy or not instead of just ignoring it and taking the precedent out of the opinion," but it's highly subjective to suggest she was "unethical" and "dishonest" for carrying out the instructions of her immediate supervisor and his boss. One could just as plausibly argue that it would have been unethical and dishonest (not to mention insubordinate) for Hillary to presume to substitute her own judgment for that of her superiors and to refuse to comply with their directions. 

Yes, you can decide if the problem plaguing Hillary's present email approach she admits was a judgement error on her part matches Snopes account when they wrote as a presumption of opposition to Zeifman's account, "One might assert..that Hillary could have taken a better approach to the task and should have.." with her own words after the emailgate fiasco in which she took 6 months to apologize stating:

"On Friday, NBC’s Andrea Mitchell repeatedly asked Clinton if she was sorry, but the Democratic presidential candidate said only that she regretted “the confusion” surrounding her emails. Then in a new interview with ABC News Tuesday, Clinton said the words she has declined to say for so long. “That was a mistake. I’m sorry about that. I take responsibility,” she told anchorman David Muir Tuesday.

 In fact are we not seeing exactly the theme permeated her campaign also unmasked with the latest O'Keefe Video highlighting her Campaign Lawyer and staff in Nevada allegedly violating registration laws in Nevada and sporting "Ask for forgiveness not for permission"



The 911 of Benghazi
According to an outline of wiki the SECRETARY OF STATE is the lead official of the U.S. Department of State and is the highest ranking appointed executive branch official in the presidential line of succession and order of precedence.

U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson said that before the terrorist attacks in Benghazi, "The State Department not only failed to honor repeated request for additional security, but instead actually reduced security in Libya." 
One wonders if some of the video equipment ISIS has used in the elaborate decapitation video's actually were part of the weapon stash delivered? He asserted Clinton contributed to the deaths of those lost in the 9-11 attack on Benghazi due to a 'dereliction of duty'. Of course, in Hillary's words, 'what difference does it make now'?

You might recall the Apology Tour Hillary Clinton went on in the Middle East after Benghazi asserting the 'videotape' was at fault, and American's free speech laws had insulted and caused the death of Ambassador Christ Stephens along with those trying to protect him after Hillary refused request for back up multiple times at the embassy while funneling arms to Syrian Rebels/Sunni Jihadist through Libya that has "morphed into ISIS."
If you haven't seen the apology tour in Pakistan Hillary Clinton and Obama went on, you have got to watch this September 20th, 2012 short clip appearing as a paid television commercial in Pakistan just prior to the coming November 2012 Election.
http://landing.newsinc.com/shared/video.html?freewheel=69016&sitesection=breitbart&VID=23817749



OBAMA'S LONG FORM BIRTH CERTIFICATE MAYDAY MAYDAY MAYDAY

The above video has always been in my heart as we face in our Nation a call for Truth and a call for new political leadership in the wake of the 911 Tragedy depicted at the end of the video. If anything is apparent with the 'establishment's problems' it is that clearly America does not feel represented in the common sense court of pubic concern. Their leaders have let them down, but in that interest of being fair, perhaps we must consider that America has also been a factor in picking their leaders?

Three people who have nailed it of late, but still refuse to see Obama as an unqualified candidate for the Office of the President and a usurper in the Office- Hillary Clinton, Debbie Wassermann Schulz, and Liz Cheney.

Hillary Clinton: "“I'm gonna fight for all the people like my mother who need somebody in their corner,” Clinton said, before adding: “And they need a leader who cares about them again.”

Debbie Wassermann Schulz: ""People just want to have confidence in their government again,

Liz Cheney: " The real challenge is going to be for Sec. Clinton to try to separate herself from what we detail in the book, very well documented set of issues, in terms of the danger this president has put us in, and of course was there for a large part of it."

How curious it is to see the recognition of our national security compromised as well the welfare of the American people by those who really refuse to support and defend the action in the U.S. Supreme Court now in Judy v. Obama 14-9396.

It seems a case of denial in the face of overwhelming evidence and facts we struggle to label 'Cover-Up'. How can you on one hand throw and sling the mud at Obama about all of his actions that have put America in a weakened condition across the board, militarily, economically, socially in the world, and refuse the fact our Constitution's simple demand that only a 'natural born Citizen', clearly recognized by the Courts as 'Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents' in a precedent case illustrating the same language in Minor v. Happersett, takes care of it all?

Those succumbing to the disillusionment do so upon their own behest approving a usurpation for whatever reason they have in their mind, or more simply still are found looking into a mirror of being very foolish towards the wisdom our framers and founders gave us within the Constitution as a protection of our national security?

This certainly is my own struggle also. For I see in the sunsets of history when I am fast asleep and have gone from this Earth in a retirement, that being taught in our Social Studies and History Classes in text book form a detailed version of the national defense The Birthers put up. And I see the students shaking their heads at the wonder of such stupidity, betrayal, and treason upon the U.S. Constitution that is sung in history as the greatest document understood by man respecting freedom and liberty.

And in those chapters and book if you will, where are the leaders that today are in power? They are found where the sun doesn't shine in the history of the Idiots Guide to screwing up National Security. I really think as history goes, they would much rather have had been remembered as being a supporter of Cody Robert Judy in that effort than every their ego supposed might be glorious in apposing.

I'll tell you this Summer may have been the Trump Summer, but its been one of the toughest droughts Cody Robert Judy has been through in lack of support. We have had two donations in the last 60 days totaling $50 in the face of 50 Post on this blog since June 18th begging for Americans to help.

I am very concerned about Americans 'mentality' that either want Mr. Trump to finance his own way to the White House or look to Politicians who figure out a 'foreign method' of accommodation in bulking up their campaign chest because Americans will not pitch in. That certainly is a consideration in the pay-to-play Playbooks.

My concern given as a burden upon my shoulders by the Creator is a great concern about American's unwillingness to support someone who is standing up for the U.S. Constitution verses someone who says they will give them a job and make them a worker; for freedom and liberty are not in the service of such. They are in fact in the depths of control by a communist regime we call an oligarchy and are for sure very uncertain about the more debutante title of U.S. Citizen and the responsibilities that go with such. I am very fearful of the claws of Justice catching them and ripping their guts and their hearts out like a bear would based on the 'dereliction of duty' and justly so.

 My prayer is for certain that some word, some sign, some mercy might be given to us together by a benevolent God  that might cast aside this imminent danger far from you, and would cast the Almighty God's balance of Justice on your side for which you would be satisfied to claim in your own good judgement smiling at His smile for you. I know in my heart if you could see Jesus's smiling face that you would cast down your disregard for this national security sanctuary we have been given and take up this cause with me.

Americans, get smart, get educated, and then stand up and support that which has given you so much as a well that never fails. It does remind me that this time was foretold: Amos 8:11
"Behold, the days come, saith the Lord GOD, that I will send a famine in the land, not a famine of bread, nor a thirst for water, but of hearing the words of the LORD"
God Bless You!





Please, consider a Contribution Now by clicking the secure Paypal link. You contribution Today will help make a Better America Tomorrow!

Sincerely, 
Cody Robert Judy
2016 D- CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT

The CRJ TODAY for a BETTER AMERICA TOMORROW
Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.
Web Site www.codyjudy.us 

Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.




Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!



Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!


Cody Robert Judy's book :
 Taking A Stand- the Conservative Independent Voice.





Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION
1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.


INSPIRING - I believe in You



APPLICATION FOR STAY PENDING FULL REVIEW ON THE RECUSAL OF JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT AND KAGAN FROM PROCEEDINGS















Thursday, June 20, 2013

MITT ROMNEY’S LOOP TE’ LOOP




MITT ROMNEY’S LOOP TE’ LOOP

As conservatives gathered in Washington DC with the Sound 70 of the House of Representatives opposed to Amnesty and open borders there was a very stirring talk that was given by Glenn Beck, the broad strokes of which you can read here.
It was a profound speech that articulated a conservative sentiment that is not only relevant in our day but certainly is relevant for our future American Citizenry. To say the least it was stirring to the heart for those hearts that are open to receive truth.

You have all heard me rail, spit, and stomp in a frustration like the devil against many a conservative radio show host who have literally squelched the civil rights infringements upon myself as a candidate for President in 2008 as a write-in when I sued Sen. John McCain on an infringement of the Constitution’s qualification for the Office of the President and served that law suit to McCain and the Republican National Committee 3 days before the National Convention in Las Vegas, Nevada where former Candidate Gov. Mitt Romney finished in 2nd place to McCain’s nomination for the Republicans. See: Judy v. McCain

Mitt Romney, as late as August in 2008 when I served the law suit, would not have anything to do with taking a stand for the Constitution in the natural born citizen requirement that McCain was in violation of in the U.S. Supreme Court precedent definition of “Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents”. (See: Minor v. Happersett- to those born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents there has never been any doubt.)

McCain was born in the foreign country of Panama, in the Panama Hospital not situated on any military base. He was born a native of Panama. Congress 11 months after his birth granted him Citizenship and then just in 2007 he was also featured in a non-binding United States Senate Resolution 511 which stated with two parents who were Citizens he was a natural born citizen to dispel a concerned conservative base.

Senate Resolution 511 was also co-sponsored by Sen. Hillary Clinton and Sen. Barack Obama in what clearly was a I’ll scratch your back if you’ll scratch mine type of an agreement. Every single Republican Senator voted for the passage of 511 with only McCain abstaining.

This sewed up the Senate for McCain but the other Branch of Congress in the House of Representatives was never let in on the vote, which is why it was considered “non-binding”, and didn’t have any Constitutional traction and why the Natural Born Citizen qualification for the Office of the President was never changed.

The same thing happened in 2012 when I sued Barack Obama as a Democratic Party candidate for President with the conservative radio show host as they rallied around Mitt Romney and again he would have nothing to do with upholding the Constitution’s requirement for the Office of the President in a legal President in the face of receiving well over 300 request and press releases from my campaign. Judy v. Obama argument : Court Docket U.S. Supreme

In 2013, we face unprecedented enslaving legislation in Obama-care and now Amnesty, the cost of which is really staggering and has been formulated as the death knell of American future and our future generations.

Former Gov. Mitt Romney won the GOP/Republican nomination in 2012 and indeed again did not stand up for the Constitution’s demand upon other candidates who were in the race in which he had direct, and I should say the most high seated standing or potential loss due to an illegal candidates activity in the race, of any other candidate, refusing and giving Obama a pass, which clearly has given rise to the legislation of Obama-care and perhaps now Amnesty the signature of an illegal unqualified person in Barack Obama.



Did Mitt Romney do you as conservatives in America any favors in not standing up for the Constitution’s demand for a natural born citizen in the Office of the President? Did he change the course of history in defining with a line in the sand what our first President George Washington and first Chief Justice John Jay of the United States Supreme Court came to agree upon was essentially necessary as a national defense act by requiring two full generations between the Office of the President and any foreign dictate which may infiltrate into that very powerful position as the Commander in Chief of the United States armies and weapons.

By requiring a birth in the United States and two citizen parents indeed a full two generation separation, or wall of national defense was naturally created against foreign dictate and this has been breached in Barack Obama who was not born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents.

As debt is seen as the new enslavement, indeed this illegal usurping occupier of the White House has signed essentially the crippling debt pact in Obama-care, which is totally unaffordable, and is prepared to sign into law backbreaking Amnesty the likes of which will essentially void the reasons people want to come through the front door of America in the first place, clearly diluting all of the protections of American’s civil rights.

The front door through the Constitution is indeed the Office of the President. You have to realize that fact and the reason the wall of our national security was created in the first place. 13 pages of the 48 pages of The Constitution pocket booklett is referenced to the detail of the President. No other office or detail even comes close to being mentioned as much. In second place is the whole Navy referenced in 2 pages to give you a little bit of an idea of how important that office is.

What did Mitt Romney do in 2008 and 2012 in his run’s for the Office of the President? He lost. He had no vision for the Constitution. He failed in defending the Constitution and the real trouble that is coming and is here can be directly contributed to his failure and what I’ve coined Mitt Romney’s “loop te loop”.

I don’t want conservatives to forget that and now we are hearing what from Glenn Beck? “You CANT TRUST THE GOP!” What?

Yes! Glenn Beck, Mr. Conservative-Mitt-Romney-voting-GOP-heart-throb says, “You can’t trust the speaker of the House John Bonner.” You can’t trust the GOP! They have sold their souls and become one with the Democrats social progressivism that has no problem violating all of your civil rights. You should be very afraid of Constitutional Civil Rights in the names of McCain, Romney, and Obama. Look at their records!

I could not agree more and now according to Glenn Beck we have just 70 in the House willing to risk their jobs on committees and chairmanships of committees in halting the passage of Amnesty. Of course remember those jobs would never be in jeopardy if Mitt Romney had taken a stand and not given Obama a pass.

Perhaps the Sound 70 have some foothold in moving the House towards the Constitution and preserving the Constitution, and thus their jobs, which it appears the progressives have no idea are in jeopardy, because without the Constitution their jobs are the first to go down the toilet as they are defined, instituted, and held in place by the Constitution, as is the United States Supreme Court Justices seats (hint-hint take a stand for it or lose your position).

The dilapidation of the Constitution’s principles hinge as a key to removing the entire U.S. Senate and the entire U.S. House, the entire United States Supreme Court, even the entire monetary system in which the whole world depends upon. There is nothing else that defines a binding agreement to the entire Government’s existence and we are very close to losing it by the hand of our own elected officials.

If there was ever a truer picture of the head of the snake eating its own tail we in the body are being eaten by the head and soon if we don’t change our voting habit we will cease to exist in our entirety.

Please enjoy, pass on to your social networks and your friends this fun and playful reminder that Mitt Romney has had 2008 and 2012 to take a stand for the Constitution and he didn’t do it, so let’s not do that again. Two “loop te loops” is enough and he had the greatest support and chance to take a stand but failed.

I am taking a stand for the Independence of America in a bold fundamental shift for the conservatives who believe in the Constitution in voting Independent. We have a long ways to go before 2016 and it is my hope that Congress will indeed hear the People and hold hearings of verification for qualification of Barack Obama so that we do not get to 2016 before we have another election for a legal President as Obama is dismissed as a liability according to U.S.C Amend. 14,Sect 3. AND the legislation considered by Obama is made null and void and reconsidered with a binding legal President’s signature.

I would appreciate your help and support in this Civil Rights movement and that support is essential to our success. Enjoy the latest Mitt Romney jingle The Cody Robert Judy Band has created as heavenly inspiration for your support.
God Bless America

Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: code4pres CODY JUDY

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-etvZmyBpWM