Monday, December 29, 2014



As Americans are settling themselves after the Christmas Season of gift giving one of the most important gifts may yet be unwrapped and under the tree addressed in waiting to: “The American People”, in the form of a U.S. Court of Appeals Case that today was confirmed to be “in conference” and “submitted to the Panel of Judges in chambers for written opinion” at the United States 10th Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver, Colorado.

Constitutional scholars would call the gift staggering to even contemplate. What indeed are the stakes that could affect every single person in the United States of America as well as future generations for the next ten generations that are found in Cody Robert Judy v. Barack Hussein Obama/Barry Soetoro et. al., Case NO. 14-3146?

Shock and Awe was used as the name of a military operation carried out upon Iraq by former President George W. Bush but the military description was developed or written by Harlan K. Ullman and James P. Wade in 1996 and is a product of the National Defense University of the United States. I myself can hardly imagine with my post on average reaching 300 people that a positive verdict for me would necessarily affect 320 million people who have no idea what's going on thanks in no small part to the Media's coverage in a silent black out. You talk about missing jumbo jets, this thing is huge and has no radar on it whatsoever.

The doctrine imposes an "overwhelming level of Shock and Awe against an adversary on an immediate or sufficiently timely basis to paralyze its will to carry on ... [to] seize control of the environment and paralyze or so overload an adversary's perceptions and understanding of events that the enemy would be incapable of resistance at the tactical and strategic levels." When applied in the political arena conditions must be perfectly timed and executed and the results are devastating to an opponent who is left scrambling to recover necessarily thrown into the back seat of defense with near total bewilderment. If I receive a favorable decision this could be the universe shattering decision we have been patiently waiting for.

As it concerns Obama the Constitution of the United States and its demands for a natural born Citizen (Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents) acts as a mirror does in identifying a vampire who has no identity or reflection and thusly represents a horror nearly unimaginable in description similar to that faced by an emperor who has no clothes on and is nakedly exposed in a true light strutting down main in a parade.

You see Obama has persuaded nearly everyone that he is qualified as a ‘Citizen’ to be President, but the term or qualification of “Citizen” hasn’t been used as a qualification for the Office of the President since the Founders declared it for themselves at the time of the adoption of the Constitution. Understanding that the Union had not existed long enough to require a ‘natural born Citizen’ to be President, and that many key in the service of the Union would be prohibited from the Office of the President, the founders and framers developed as a natural national security barrier and measure of qualification the Article of the Constitution known as article two, section one, clause five.

In this second article of the supreme law of the land, it reads, “No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of the President.” This simple phrase declares anyone who has any kind of foreign alien-ship not permitted or prohibited from legally holding the powers declared to the President of the United States.

If the same criteria of “Citizen” were required for President as for the Office of a U.S. Representative or U.S. Senator no distinction would have been necessary. We are left with what amounts to a two prong test illuminating any foreign influence or alienship in the Office of the President declared by the rights inherited by birth within the Union of States, or soil, and the rights inherited from either the mother or the father, both respected equally as suffrage is in the U.S. extended to both male and female genders.

Said another way, the respect owed to each parent is required as an inherited right to citizenship. It is wrong to exclude the fathers Obama has included in his narrative in Dreams of My Fathers. Obama has inherited both a Kenyan/British Subject of the Queen nationality from his father Obama Sr. who was a Kenyan at the time of Obama’s birth and was also adopted legally by his step father Lolo Soetoro where he received an Indonesian nationality or alienship. In honoring these certain nationalities and foreign status’s Obama is prohibited from the Office of the President of the United States of America under the umbrella of the U.S. Constitution.

Now because of his mother’s citizenship, he is indeed allowed to occupy and legally be elected to the Office of a U.S. Representative or U.S. Senator provided the other progressively stringent details required for each as criteria or demands for qualification are met that include age and years of residence. These are elementary and also inflexible.
We do not allow 16 year olds to run for Office, we do not allow those who have immigrated and been naturalized to immediately run for office and we certainly do not allow foreigners to bed Americans and ascend to the highest Office of the Land financed by foreign governments. The national core curriculum for these offices was established and while they have been challenged by the stomping gnashing teeth fit throwing devils of pompous ego they have conservatively remained intact as the will of the people.

As the will of the People has been a very serious concern of mine, I have endeavored to protect the principles of the people and my civil rights sheltered under the United States Constitution as a candidate for President in 2008, 2012, and now 2016 bombarded by what amounts to a continuous and devilish temper’-tantrum of battering assaults by treasonous scorpions of our home-land infected with nefarious traitorous un-American loyalties. Like communist leaches they endeavor to suck the life out of a brilliant child of freedom and liberty with contemptuous hatred unprovoked and certainly undeserved.

As haters of natural law they perform labors for privileged class, elitism, as well as racist, religious, gender, and color discrimination desiring nothing more than ruin of the exact principles of our Constitution that I desire to uphold. My heart aches for the Democratic Party that has all but found ruin with the nuclear implosion of Obama as he sucked out all the air necessary for a healthy supply of life blood as an empirical vampire of racism used and abused like a sad poster child with very little reality or principle attached to his mythical story noticed by the remains of a fabricated long form birth certificate and a forged draft registration.

Off the top of your head, can you the general public name charismatic Congressmen under 45 that are prominent in the Democratic Party like Cruz, Rubio, or Lee in the Republican Party? The combined average age of Hillary Clinton 67, Joe Biden-72, Elizabeth Warren 65, Nancy Pelosi 74, Harry Reid 75 is 70.6 years old. Democratic Party Leadership in the House average age is 64.2 years compared to the top five House Republicans at 53. Let’s get real; this is due more to a toxic dose of elitism in this generation then due to a date of original founding or formulation of the Democrat and Republican parties.

Stifling defeats of exclusion have permeated the old party of inclusion fondly recalled in heartwarming cognizant left by the courage of President Kennedy and I’ll even say President Bill Clinton. Cheating and scheming infected the class lending death to civil and moral responsibility that left nothing in the wake of party inheritance that ultimately has been squandered by aging geriatrics agreeing with one another’s egos that a complete spoil of a once brilliant party was their right. That so-called ‘right or entitlement’ has about as much thought for future generations as Cinderella’s step-mother had for her compared to her own daughters exemplified by Hollywood’s recent release of “Into the Woods”.

Without the United States Constitution we are hurled back to the days of the sixties and indeed hurled further back into Civil War where the rights of minorities including those of gender suddenly disappear no more respected than what ‘might finds as right’ with the black eyes formed by the hammer coming down between them. Who do you have to thank for that?

Is it the Usurper or fabricated Obama who Hillary Clinton made a choice to refuse her civil rights be upheld from, as a candidate with standing in the Presidential Race of 2008? Why did she not take him to Court demanding her civil rights in violation because Obama had violated the presidential race rules, he did not qualify to the demands of the Constitution for the Office of the President? Ultimately she did not have the confidence in the Constitution that if she did get the nomination away from Obama she could beat McCain, who she could have pulled the same lever on? Come on!

Hillary Clinton has no one to blame but herself for missing her window of opportunity. The same paralyzing philosophy that declares a person fit for Office because of the color of the skin is about as remarkably unbelievable as declaring someone fit for Office because of their gender; both are disrespectful of the character inside a person and more respectful of some outward characteristic which is superfluous in the least and a grave discrimination at worst. What’s next, Blonde Haired and Blue eyed discrimination for a superior race? These ideals of Hitler are what are ruining the Democratic Party.

Yes, sometimes justice takes a long time to wade through, but getting away with robbery for six years doesn’t negate the facts of being robbed and six years is not a statutory right of exemption or a statute of limitation noticed in the order of discretionary prosecution.

Cheating and lying while you’re in the balances of Justice is a disservice of the principle of Justice for all. If you have to lie and cheat to get what you want, what you want will never be fulfilling to your soul. Obama’s got an identity crisis that has imploded upon the Democratic Party as a dis-service of justice, or as a disproportion of equality. In short, it is evident that the engaging principles of Obama supported by Hillary Clinton are hypocritical to the core of the middle class of America and unless the Democratic Party turns that around with a remarkable change those presiding will find they preside over nothing but garbage. The deluge of think-tank has inundated the Democratic Party capsizing in the lost elections of 2010 and 2014 with the willful neglect towards the Constitution’s demands for a natural born Citizen.

Ah, you might say Obama won 2012, but did he? If he is drug out of the White House as a disgrace to the Constitutional requirements for the Office of the President that he is, did he win? How will history reflect upon Obama? Will American children learn of his forged and fabricated identity and emulate that as a practice to honor in cheating and lying on their homework all the way through school?

Justice plays a big part in every American person’s life. The denial of justice plays no part of service that repentance and forgiveness does. Justice is something minorities are crying out for right now but Obama is no Champion of Justice. Justice cannot be cheated or else injustice is suffered. Where the demands of justice cannot be made, an intersession must be made. Those were the demands for a Savior who could suffer for us our mistakes that a repentance and forgiveness could be made so Justice could even exist.

Obama cannot get away from what he has done. Justice has a perfect way. Now the “Shock and Awe” of justice would necessarily be preceded with a dereliction of justice, with a promotion of injustice, with a discard of rights, with a hyped sense of getting away with murder so-to-speak. Indeed we have seen that with the Media’s self acknowledged political decree, “Protect Obama at all cost every day”.

Well the cost has mounted up and been heaped upon as the trust of the American Public has come to roost in most every networks bottom line. They have done their job well, ‘protect Obama at all cost every day’, the public trust, the cost of Justice, they spared no expense feeling lies and fabrications worth covering. This provides a huge vacuum for the truth, reality, and most importantly the U.S. Constitution that eventually comes around and is the ‘Shock and Awe’.

If Obama is found ineligible and required to make restitution to me as a Candidate for President because he violated the rules, how far away are we from a transformation of collective thought which moves Congress to declare anything signed by Obama is moot? You know the Judge declared my law suit against McCain ‘moot’ after Obama won and that didn’t feel really good, so I know how Obama would feel if all he had done was declared ‘moot’ and it doesn’t feel very good, but that is what he is headed for thinking Justice can be cheated with lies, deception, fabrications, falsehoods, and forgeries.

How does that affect Obamacare? How does that affect Obama-Amnesty and so on? Wow! Can you imagine Congress’s correction towards the Constitution sliding back on the road when they were about to go off the cliff? Well, all of this has been in the balance for many years. I’ve had cases in three different states and the U.S. Supreme Court that were denied with all of this in the balance and a brick was handed to me telling me I was a slave with no rights. I know how that feels and it’s not very good. I’ve learned to live with disappointment and think how the Israelites were left in bondage 400 years before Moses came on the scene to deliver them out of bondage into a new life of freedom and liberty.

I have learned to pray for Justice suffering injustices. I have felt the bitter and am left with hope for the sweet. Can you imagine having the sweetness and hoping for the bitterness? Doesn’t work that way; as human beings we want the sweetness of justice and equality under the law. That doesn’t mean that we are all clones with the same color of shirts, but it means we each as individuals have rights that need to be respected. Our Courts work very hard to uphold and keep that trust alive. It is a mutually bonding element of warmth we all indeed share and how warm it is on otherwise cold nights.

Judy v. Obama is indeed in chambers and is set to be ruled upon shortly. I don’t know exactly when it was submitted for a decision as ripe by the Clerks and I don’t know how long it may be in chambers much like one doesn’t know how long it will take for a jury to reach a decision but we do know now for certain that the process of a decision is underway, that all arguments have been submitted and now are closed. The U.S. District Court Records submitted and a decision is now close at hand.
Cody Robert Judy

For those wishing to read the court action I have filed in Judy v. Obama filed in the Tenth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, Denver, CO. I invite you to here. I also would like to make an appeal to you for contributions which you can send to the address listed on the Court document to me if you'd like or you can now do that online at the web site now.

This 2016 Commercial was the first one in the 2016 Race for President with over 1500 views already. The commercial emphasize why Republicans and Democrats are not fit or really in a position to lead America at this time. Please watch it and share this with your friends.

These times are hard times in the trenches. It seems to be the nature of contributions and donations to follow winners, rather then those who are maintaining the high ground. Campaigns are not cheap and if you sacrifice your principles you'll find its only a very expensive war that could take your whole life that is necessary to get them back. THERE IS SOMETHING GOING ON - ITS DARK BEFORE THE DAWN

We need your help. Will you help us or are the outrageous lies your being told by your elected leaders okay for you and your children? If you won't defend your children and their future who will you defend?

The 2016 Campaign begins now. Please send your contributions and help with the ABC (American Birther Campaign) today and my election for President in 2016 and Join the 252 of us now on my Facebook Cody Robert Judy for U.S. President 2016 site.

Cody Robert Judy for President 2016
3031 So. Ogden Ave. Suite #2
Ogden, Utah 84401

Thank you
Cody Robert Judy
Candidate for United States President 2016

The Commercial is simply called "America"



  1. You failed to mention that the trial court concluded your suit was "frivolous, irrational and wholly incredible." There is no reason to think that your "appeal" will arrive at a different conclusion.

  2. @Anonymous That has been mentioned in several blog post prior in case you missed it, you are welcome to do some research. To the rusty assertion that there " is no reason to think that your 'appeal' will arrive at a different conclusion', do you recommend all Appeal Courts be disbanded or just one for me?

    History has a great lesson on Appeals and Civil Rights for us all to remember and the three tiered Judicial Branch gives us reason a-plenty to understand there was wisdom in their conception. What you are really interested in is "prediction" or "prophesy" for which there will be no credit for not leaving your name. Perhaps you'd like to remedy that so we all have you on record? It might be your big chance?

  3. Considering the number of court cases you've lost... ie all of them, you'd
    think you'd know by now that "distributed for conference" means your appeal
    is dead. Distributed for conference only happens when the assigned judge
    doesn't think it's got a hope in hell, and just sends it around one last
    time in case one of the others wants to pick it up, which nobody does 99.9%
    of the time (no exaggeration).

    So either you have no clue even after all of the cases you've lost.... or
    you're just trying to string your readers along..... all three of them.

    Which begs the question of what your excuse will be when you lose, after
    posting this "hopeful" message?

  4. Dear sir: I respect your efforts, but (and I say this as a French legal scholar) there is nothing that prevents your President from being a dual citizen. James Madison was offered and gladly accepted in writing French citizenship before he ran and was elected US President, and while mentioned during the campaign, no one saw that fact as an obstacle. Before you raise the point, I will add that there is no such thing (and never was) as a "French honorary citizenship". We have no such concept. We also do not differentiate in law between natural-born (through soil or parentage) and naturalized citizens. Madison was simply a dual-citizen: natural-born to the US, and naturalized to France. Some of your other arguments might prevail, but I'm pretty certain that your Courts, aware of this precedent, would not agree that dual citizenship disqualifies someone from being elected President of your country. (As an aside during the 1940s your Courts recognized the US citizenship of a male descendent of the Marquis de Lafayette based on a document issued by the Commonwealth of Virgina, I believe, very early on in the history of your country; so I'm pretty sure they would do the same research here and arrive at the same conclusion I have.) Respectfully, L.

  5. @French Legal Scholar - Thanks for your Comment. James Madison was actually exempted through the 'grandfather clause which states ' or a Citizen of the United States at the time of the adoption of this Constitution', so did not have to qualify as a 'natural born Citizen'. As the purpose of the unique qualifications of the Office of the President, and the purposes of national security to keep 'foreign alienship' out of that particular office, I must disagree with your analogy simply on the basis that we do not allow foreign alienship to command our armies as Commander-In-Chief or President.
    THE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT: In a July 25, 1787 letter to Gen. George Washington as the Constitution was being debated, John Jay, who later became the first chief justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, wrote:
    Dear Sir,
    Permit me to hint whether it would not be wise and seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of [foreigners] into the administration of our national government ; and to declare expressly that the command in chief of the American army shall not be given to, nor devolve on any but a [natural born citizen]. [SIC-Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents. ]
    I remain, dear sir,
    Your faithful friend and servant,
    John Jay.

    Though I'm not a respected scholar I will forward a link to one whom I believe focuses on this very well.

  6. @Witch Get out of the ditch. Distributed for Conference as it applies to the United States Supreme Court, but not for the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals., but the term can be applied to notice a decision is in chambers. Meaning you are not paying attention and haven't a clue to what Court your making reference to or that's the only thing you could think of to say. As you did beg an intelligent question, "What your excuse will be when you lose, after posting this "hopeful" message?

    I trust that answer will come to me like the answers have come to others who have lost appeals in Appellant Courts and moved on to the U.S. Supreme Court and won if it comes at all.

    Hope in our U.S. Constitution is never vein hope. . regardless of the way I'm treated by the Courts and you have to admit the political landscape has changed since 2012 hasn't it now. If anything, the Justices might be sensing a change in America political score, and that could effect a much different outcome from the time when the D's controlled the House, the Senate, and the Executive Branch. They lost now 2 of them, what do you say to that hope of reality we are in now? Realities can and do change.
    As ever, your humble servant