Saturday, March 21, 2015

Sen Ted Cruz Center Stage in Ineligibility Monday As Nation Considers Veiled Threat to U.S. Supreme Crt.

Cruz Controlled
Sen Ted Cruz Center Stage in Ineligibility Monday As Nation Considers Veiled Threat to U.S. Supreme Crt.

With a big planned announcement set for Monday, March 23rd,2015 at Liberty University Sen. Cruz may have tipped his hand to announcing an official entry into the Presidential Race of 2016. 'The announcement set off speculation that Cruz is just days away from officially throwing his hat in the ring for the 2016 presidential race. While no one in Cruz's camp would confirm the content of his upcoming speech, a political staffer told The Daily Beast, "You're going to want to be there."

If that indeed proves to be the case we certainly hope that Sen. Cruz is up to defending his ineligibility in the United States District Court as part of his opening ceremony in cutting his teeth in the Presidential Race. Indeed Sen. Cruz may be performing an invaluable service for our Country because he's not partially black and most likely will not be defended by the Main Stream Media as a Minority in fending off a Presidential Eligibility Article II Patriot stand as 'racist', unless he decides it 'racist' that his Canadian Native Citizenship by soil and his father's inherited Canadian and Cuban Citizenship are foreign/alien national identities that the United States is bound to honor in the Office of the Presidency for the United States of America.

Indeed if the a ruse has been undertaken by Sen. Cruz in deference to Obama we are obliged to counter his play in defense of the United States Constitution so many have bled for giving life,limb and liberty in their heroic actions in service of our Republic.

In a recent stained carpet exploit Sen. Cruz's defense as eligible was snipped by Attorney Mario Apuzo and reported at The Birther Report. The all is fair in treading upon the U.S. Constitution's demand for a natural born Citizen in the Office of the President was undertaken in a report entitled "On the Meaning of Natural Born Citizen" as Commentary by Neal Katyal & Paul Clement embarrassingly sporting their credentials as former Solicitor Generals in dereliction that any difference at all exist between the foreign national U.S. citizen first generation, and the time honored natural defense on behalf of our national security and tradition of a two generation buffer identified as natural born Citizen required only for the Office of the President and Vice President.

Indeed Neal Katyal & Paul Clement forming a scholastic tradition of their own law, published by none other then the same Harvard Law Review Obama was credited as President of without a single word or published Review available and the dicey accusations that Obama actually was financed by a twenty million dollar donation of foreign fiat, have embarked in a challenge that puts the words of Chief Justice Roger B. Taney featured on one of this Blog's most widely read FEATURES to the test.
As Chief Justice Roger B. Taney wrote in Holmes v. Jennison (1840) as to the importance of every word of the U.S. Constitution:
"In expounding the Constitution of the United States, every word must have its due force, and appropriate meaning; for it is evident from the whole instrument, that no word was unnecessarily used, or needlessly added. The many discussions which have taken place upon the construction of the constitution, have proved the correctness of this proposition; and shown the high talent, the caution, and the foresight of the illustrious men who framed it. Every word appears to have been weighed with the utmost deliberation, and its force and effect to have been fully understood

Arm Yourself with Intelligence Art. II. Patriots with our new 9 point Quick Defense Cards

Indeed we are left with motive and we also notice herein that Harvard has served equally both Sen. Ted Cruz in his conferred J.D. in Law as well as Obama.

As a unofficial Presidential Candidate who has not yet entered the race for 2016, Cody Robert Judy is watching very carefully what Sen. Cruz decides to do because Sen. Cruz's first hurdle into the Presidential race might be doing more than having a go at Iowa in two years. It could very well be his retirement party from being an embarrassed TX. Senator who chose to 'Tread' on US rather then defend the U.S. Constitution as his oath required.

From the early traditions of America the Gadsden Flag reminiscent of even Founder Benjamin Franklin who delighted us with his renditions and use of the rattlesnake in an insinuated satirical cartoon co-opted by England's tradition of sending known criminals to America he disassembled to represent the 13 Colones. The inference was that those attempting to take the next step crossing the line of illegality on the U.S. Constitution were indeed stepping into a danger zone that could result in a venomous attack by a sharped fanged predator. The use of a rattlesnake coiled and ready to strike with a rattle was indeed a warning not to take another step nearer the line that was about the circumference of the snake.

In the tradition of holding the line that a 'natural born Citizen' is exactly a two generation defense of our national security holding those Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents have a longer time honored America loyalty distinguished from first generation Americans I have sent the following letter directly as it relates to preparing what seems to be an afront upon America from both sides of the isle in directive assault upon the natural defense of our U.S. Constitution and willingness of Candidates from both major parties to do so.

Begin LTR.
Dear Mr. Mario Apuzo Esq.
Would you consider filling suit for me as a Presidential Candidate, pro bono , against Sen. Ted Cruz as he is expected to enter the Presidential Race this coming Monday, March 23rd, 2015.

You may know the actions I have filed in 2008 against Sen. McCain that also involved Sen. Obama. Then I filed in 2012 against Obama to N.H. Supreme Crt., Georgia Supreme Crt ., and U.S. SUPREME CRT.

My current and last chance case against Obama I have Just filed a Notice of Appeal from 10th Circuit Crt. 14-4136.

My biggest question regarding appropriate standing is can I claim Sen. Cruz is taking contributions from me by his entry even though he is not the Republican nominee?

My considered answer is he is causing a whole lot of damage and extra work for me contending for the NATURAL BORN CITIZEN clause as I'm battling and spending so much time now fighting with Republicans that it is wasting precious resources away from my campaign for President.

Thank you for your blog and tireless fight for The U.S. Constitution and especially as an Art. II Patriot.I respect and appreciate your efforts.

In 2012 I ran as a Democrat. In 2008 I ran as a Write-In. I have not ruled out running under the D Party Ticket, neither ruled out an Independent Party Ticket for 2016 but have not officially entered yet as either. However, I'm feeling more and more inclined as a Democratic Party Ticket mostly because of Cruz and Rubio and the fact the courts in 2012 ballot challenges didn't really care I was a D against Obama. I think damages are being inflicted upon me across party lines from the moment of entry.

My blog has many entries already about Sen. Cruz that have also been published as Featured Editorials as proof of damages in time, talent, and money.

My web site

My thought is Sen. Cruz eligibility fought fast and furiously in U.S. District Court could prove beneficial to the last stand in the U.S. Supreme Court against Obama.

Thank you for your consideration.
Cody Robert Judy
End LTR.

The two frontal assault is not at all foreign to me as I sued Sen. McCain in 2008 and continued that with Obama as a Presidential Candidate in 2012, 13, and the latest work in Judy v. Obama 14-4136 appealed as reported with a Notice of Appeal here.

One of the biggest reason I have related to every Court I have appealed to that the U.S. Constitution in the eligibility clause was being attacked by both parties was that non-binding U.S. Senate Resolution 511 included three major candidates for election Sen. John McCain, Sen. Hillary Clinton, and then Sen. Barack Obama. Indeed we might say especially if Hillary Clinton enters the Presidential Race and wins that this resolution included the winner of America's Presidential Elections for the last three Presidential Contest making it very significant as far as non-binding resolutions go.

If the Judicial Branch fails to act as a check and balance to the major parties in the Legislative Branch, and the breach of both the Democrats and Republicans controlling the Legislative Branch and the Executive Branch continues rolling over the U.S. Constitution, indeed the Judicial Branch might soon find itself irrelevant also because without a living Constitution their appointments are also moot and that includes the life long paycheck of those who are in the U.S. Supreme Court who perhaps muse at Obama's recent pander that a new U.S. Supreme Court and mandatory voting might be fun as was reported again on this blog piece in The Blaze link:

[President Barack Obama said that in the long term “it would be fun” to go through the process of amending the Constitution to put limits on campaign contributions, but said the short-term solution to curbing the influence of money in politics is if “everybody voted.” “Here’s the problem. Citizens United was a Supreme Court ruling based on the First Amendment. So it can’t be overturned by statute,” Obama said. “It could be overturned by a new court or it could be overturned by a constitutional amendment. Those are extraordinarily challenging processes.”], but as C.I.C he actually could replace the Court with one drone missile and blame it on ISIS who were left an assortment of weapons in Iraq also reported here.

The Courts thus far in the Article II, Section I, Clause 5's demand the President be a natural born Citizen have been willing to throw back the responsibility to Congress avoiding the issue under a doctrine political question argument and at the same time thinking their responsibility is impervious to a political or military action. Obama's muse should be taken to heart as he said some 22 times as was reported by House Speaker Boehner he could not by executive action change the Court's stand on Amnesty, but we know now he has done it.

While the threat to the U.S. Supreme Court was veiled as a long term process by Obama and the eligibility argument has been repeatedly refused by the Court making Obama feel comfortable in the Office of the President, the Court should understand that a different objective from Obama might supply the motive for its more immediate change and that the eligibility argument might have been the only one they in fact refused, which in the end spilled their blood as traitors to the law they were sworn to protect as the Supreme Law of the Land.

Taking this lightly could easily be their undoing by a political party ruled so far to the left that even a Democratic Party centrist like Hillary Clinton in the Democratic Party is spurred and worthy of being sabotaged by no less than six investigations as Rush Limbaugh's transcript reported Obama's operatives were leaking to the press.

You might say you can't take it with you and you'd be right; My job is really just to make it clear as a bell and you'd think Obama was seconding the motion with his speech in Cleveland, Ohio Wednesday. Today former Governor O'Malley was seen in Iowa as a runner up for a Hillary Implosion but given the political climate change I could see a Democratic Party debate between O'Malley and myself with the stark difference that I actually was taking a stand for Civil Rights and doing something about the Republican infringements on the U.S. Constitution by a Constitutional uncaring Sen.Cruz.

Cody Robert Judy

We need your help. Will you help us or are the outrageous lies your being told by your elected leaders okay for you and your children? Indeed, it is time to Restore America's Trust Today for a Better America Tomorrow.

Cody Robert Judy

We NEED YOUR HELP AMERICA now, to take the 10th Circuit Court's Decision not to hear Cody's Case to the U.S. Supreme Court. We are Taking a Stand for individual Civil Rights and against an unprecedented ASSAULT upon your Constitution and prior decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court! With your help we can make it happen. You are a very important key to this. So its up to you America to help Restore America Today for a Better America Tomorrow. Like, Share, and Help us in the Contribution Revolution.


Get your questions answered by ordering Cody Robert Judy's Book here.

The 2016 Campaign begins now. Please send your contributions and help with the ABC (American Birther Campaign) today and my election for President in 2016 and Join the 257 of us now on my Facebook Cody Robert Judy for U.S. President 2016 site.

Cody Robert Judy for President 2016
3031 So. Ogden Ave. Suite #2
Ogden, Utah 84401

Thank you
Cody Robert Judy
Candidate for United States President 2016


The Commercial is simply called "America"



  1. A 'natural born citizen' is a person born of citizen parents.

  2. @R.C. Jackman thank you for your comment. I respectfully would disagree only because you left out "Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents" Without the birth jurisdictional value or soil affirmation is lost. With jurisdictional claims of U.S. Constitution importance, territories, foreign bases, and foreign soil do not have the full weight and measure as do the States under the United States Constitution. Its the simple fact that our U.S. Constitution does not have jurisdiction over foreign terrritories as they are not a State of the United States whose umbrella is the United States of America.