Thursday, August 13, 2015



Polling is a a bit of science and also a bit of influence. June 22nd, 2015, not even two months ago now, a previously unelected Candidate for public office Mr. Donald Trump entered the race recognized as Candidate #511 with assigned Federal Election Commission (F.E.C) No.  P80001571 and in less than two months zoomed to the top of Republican Polls. On the same F.E.C link  notice Mr. Cody Robert Judy also previously unelected is known as F.E.C Candidate #248 with No. P20003372

Many different organizations conduct state and national political polls when they are commissioned to do so by their customers. These customers can include the Candidates themselves as well as other interested organizations who pretty much do not have the time to do it themselves. There are many different methodologies as well as controversy about which method is most accurate.

To conduct a Poll just about all you need is a list of questions and some time yourself to do it. Of course the motive for conducting the Poll is simple for a Candidate for President- an interest of exactly where you stand as a Candidate in any particular State at any given time under prescribed conditions. The phrasing of the questions is probably the single best indicator of reliability of the information, so that is very important.

For instance:
[If the election were held today] gives us a 'Time' and 'Condition'. Today is the "Time" and the 'Election' is the condition. [Would you vote for Cody, Donald, or Jeb] gives us the specific targets by multiple choice as subjects of the time and condition.
  • If the election were held today, would you vote for Donald, Jeb or Cody ?
  • If the election were held today, would you vote for Donald or Cody?
  • If the election were held today, would you vote for Bush, Trump, or Judy?
  • If the election were held today, who would you vote for?
There is methodology even in placement of the subjects. For instance a Poll-Taker who doesn't recognize any of the names might be inclined to either vote for the first name he/she hears, or the last name he/she hears spoken. This is where the guessing game starts. Does the Poll-Taker  know and understand who exactly they are being questioned about, under the correct time, and conditions, or is he/she just trying to get through the test so he/she can get back to mowing the lawn? For more information on Polls, who takes them, polling methodology, what the margin of error means exactly we recommend this link.

Of course we have stressed the all important meeting between the Pollster and the Client where the questions are agreed to and phrased exactly the way the Client wants them to be phrased. The reason we have stressed this is because if anything is wrong and an unknown factor comes into play or comes into the arena, the information of the Poll can be completely wrong. It is this factor that makes Polling about as good as throwing your money in the air if the conditions, time, or subjects are wrong.

For instance, every Poll conducted that has Hillary Clinton in it basically assumes she is going to be a Candidate in the race at a particular time either for the Primary or the General Election. But what happens if she is indicted criminally on charges of mis-handling national security secrets and has to drop out of the race? One has to wonder why Mrs. Clinton didn't turn over the server voluntarily if the server was blank as is being reported by FOX ; and how important where the 'Top Secret', Special Intelligence, and NoForn emails that she did turn over that were stored on a server that easily is said to be the victim to the Russians and Chinese Governments?

Pollsters work very hard not to bring into the Polling Question the conditions that might set off a red light to Poll-Takers unless that is exactly the intent. For instance a simply question posed desiring to know the Trust Issue of Mrs. Clinton might be simply - [Do you trust Mrs. Clinton with the Office of the President? ]

Now we compare that question with the question feeding more information to the Poll-Taker:
[Given the recent 'Top Secret' national security emails found on Mrs. Clinton private email server while she was Secretary of State, and her choice not to use a Government protected server based on convenience, do you trust her with the Office of the President? ]

The first question might take advantage of what the Poll-Taker doesn't even know yet, because he is not on the Drudge Report 24/7. You can certainly understand both questions are now very legitimate and relevant questions with the reality of the conditions. Its very interesting how a Candidate begins to Poll well when their name is actually used in the Polling Question as apposed to leaving it up to the Poll Taker and the Main Stream Media's coverage of any and all of the Candidates or lack thereof.

For instance, with no coverage by the National Media, what a shocking realization it is for Democrats to all of a sudden start hearing Democrats when asked, "Who are you voting for if the election were held today?" with no Candidates mentioned say -Cody Robert Judy. That's huge!

So if we factored in the percentage of 'Time' in National Media Coverage per Candidate verses Polling References we might see a 3% Polling factor for Mr. Cody Robert Judy actually represent a much greater influence because he's had no National Media Coverage to begin with. That is what we are seeing!

This factor has lead us to take our own Secret Poll including a more realistic approach for Time, Conditions, and Subjects and we feel it is even more accurate than what the other Candidates, News Organizations, and Super PACS are getting from their Polling Numbers with more relevant conditions being asked representing reality.

500 self described Democrats or leaning Independents Likely to Vote Democratic Party

1. Question of Fairness Importance -Do you feel like the Qualifications for President and Vice President in the Constitution considered by the U.S. Supreme Court should be equally and fairly adhered to by all the Candidates for President regardless of race, color, or gender? [yes or no] 496 Yes 4 No

2.Question of Importance of Holding Prior Office- If Hillary Clinton is indicted on Criminal Charges, would you consider a previously unelected Candidate for President awarded damages by the Supreme Court of the United States to his Campaigns for President in 2008 and 2012  from an illegal Candidate usurping the Office? [yes or no] 500 Yes 0 No

3.Question of Civil Conduct Expectation- Do you feel illegal exemptions to the Qualifications of the Office of the President found in the U.S. Constitution due to race, color, or gender represent 'discrimination' or 'racism' or 'sexism'? [yes or no] 494 Yes 6 No

4. Question of Criminal Intent- Do you feel like a Federal Candidate running for an Office he/she is not qualified for under the U.S. Constitution's requirements represents Fraud upon a Contributor? [yes or no] 495 Yes 5 No

5. How important are [Action v.Words] to you- Cody Robert Judy is a Candidate for President who has a bi-partisan Record legally defending the Qualifications for the Office of the President against McCain/Obama in 2008 and Obama 2012 all the way to the Supreme Court of the United States; Donald Trump has no legal Record of monetary assistance but said on National Television he didn't think Obama qualified.

 Who would you vote for in the General Election:
Cody Robert Judy- Democratic - 455 Winner!
 Donald Trump as the Republican -45

Leading in the Polls - I am very proud of these results! These are legitimate concerns and real legal considerations that are serious. There are always people who will get up and use their popularity in an arena that the popularity is not based in to get elected.

 She was famous- elected to the Congress by a margin of 20,000 votes before the Gulf War and offered to have sex with Saddam Hussein in return for peace in the region. She was not elected at the end of her term in 1991. Ilona Staller of course was elected in the French Parliament in 1985 but in 1983 she had appeared as an apprentice in the hardcore porn film Red Telephone.

To leave out the serious questions that represent our reality today, especially Cody Robert Judy's work and Case currently the longest lasting eligibility Case in U.S. History in Judy v. Obama 14-9396 is really messing up all of the current Polling Conditions as well as Subjects and Timing of the cross party lines polling.

"What if" questions certainly are not being considered in today's polling questions by most Polling Companies. The problem with that are the WHAT IF questions that are actually backed up by facts we can all agree today are reality are very important and also are being left out.

That is why we expect a major shift in the 2016 political landscape... yet again within the next two months.

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!

Please join Cody Robert Judy and his overflowing 5000 friends on Facebook on our new 2016 Facebook Site as we close in on another 500 Goal at the Cody Robert Judy for President 2016! and Follow CodyRobertJudy2016 on Twitter.

Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.

Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!

Cody Robert Judy's book :
 Taking A Stand- the Conservative Independent Voice.

Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.

1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.

INSPIRING - I believe in You


No comments:

Post a Comment