BREAKING NEWS:
Featured Editorial The Post & Email
Natural Born Citizen Case U.S. SUPREME Court
JUDY V. OBAMA Case 14-9396
MOTION TO REOPEN and RECONSIDER Filed!
The Motion to Reopen and Reconsider the Motion for forma pauperis was a concerted effort among Patriots who are very concerned the qualification for President is being run over rough shod and bullied through by popular personality antic-politics, whose motive is self-serving to the particular politicians subscribing for power rather than serving the People through the Constitution.
That's always been the problem when it comes to position and power with politics; and if you asked any foreigner whose is a politician if he or she would like to be President of the United States and the Commander-In-Chief of the Military of the U.S.A, you'd have to be delusional to say they wouldn't like a chance at that seat.
The ways and means to over-throw the USA from within is tantalizing and the Office of the President both a strong check of authority as the highest ranking Office in the whole Executive Branch and a weak link as the Judicial Branch and the Legislative Branches power structures are diversified into many elected and appointed positions. The concentration of power needed in the Office of the President for Quick Action makes it a Prime Position for an over-throw or usurpation and thus must be guarded with all and due diligence.
The qualification for the Office of the President are not to be taken lightly or treated with trivial fanciful, or air-headed requite. The duty to the [natural born Citizen] requirement of the U.S. Constitution has been guarded strongly in the Congress with eight attempts to change the definition just since 2004 soundly defeated.
The Principle has been fought for house to house, town to town, city to city, state to state, in the Social Venues of our Time and the Judicial Branch. Claims of winning a change by the technicalities of [standing] the Judicial Branch has been bound to honor have clouded the vision of many people who call it 'RESOLVED', when it is continually Tested and bombarded with the cruelest intentions and tricks of political deceit.
Those politicians either co-opted by favor, or unwilling to spend the money to defend the Principle clamor over it in the 2016 Election that has nothing to do with Obama. This should tell everyone it is not RESOLVED as to the question of many different and varying degrees of citizenship honored by statute and naturalization processes that Congress is afforded. It is not [Citizen] that is the question, but it is [natural born Citizen] that by the very degrees and claims by Sen. Cruz and Sen. Rubio have to do with both conferred status by jurisdiction of Place and conferred status by Parents.
In the banana split of the Main Stream Media is the melting icecream mixing and matching with confusion all the flavors of Title 8 § 1401 a-h Statute [Citizen]ship, which is not [natural born Citizenship]. Along with the big bananas on the side that are claiming the 14th Amendment defined by naturalization powers of Congress is something that was never intended or legally seen as a replacement to the qualification of the Office of President's [natural born Citizen].
 |
| A Banana Split is a mix of lots of different kinds of flavors like U.S. Citizen. A [natural born Citizen] is only one {Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents} |
Of course we as the USA are a mix of lots of these different icecreams and flavors, however, we reserved the Office of the President as something very special. May the Cherry on top that represents an incentive for those who come around to stick around and propagate American Culture.
Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents represents a TIME period that is an increase of responsibility. Just like there is a difference between the TIME period of Citizenship for U.S. Representatives and U.S. Senators there is a two generation TIME period in place in the natural born Citizen qualification requirement for the Office of President that has been UPheld and should be honored as Law not as a joke about Birthers.
Of course Mr. Donald Trump has said he doesn't want to spend any money on legal fees, he wants to save the money rather than see to it the Principle of [natural born Citizen] is upheld within his own Republican Party. This mirrors the 'go along to get along' mentality that the Establishment Republicans have managed to infuriate their entire base into supporting someone who is not part of the Washington DC Establishment, but isn't the 'mentality' to not fight for the Constitution the same?
Yes, some faces change, but the Principles stay the same. I admire Mr. Trump's ability to make deals, and I admire Mr. Trump's ability to build big tall buildings, however, when it comes to the Constitution I'm not sure Mr. Trump understands necessarily the duty of Patriotism and the oath required of a President to preserve, protect, and defend, the United States Constitution, not that Obama does.
With the help of a few faithful donors over the last week we have raised $150 dollars that have provided the expense of printing and mailing the copies required of this Motion to the United States Supreme Court, but we need more help. We cannot rest on one Motion. WE need you and your help with a Campaign, the only one who is preserving, protecting, and defending this very CORE PRINCIPLE.
Come and join us if you feel about America's Constitution the way you do about your spouse or family, that you would do anything and everything to protect them the way you love them.
If you cannot STAND for the Constitution as a Candidate how will you do it as the President?
It is the continued question to myself that has been my motive to continue against the odds in filing and petitioning with zeal the Principles of the Office of the President. This takes courage and requires leadership skills specific to the duties of the Office.
If I was not TAKING A STAND for the Principles within the Constitution I could not in good conscience ask you for your vote. Hey, take a look at the IOWA Caucus Report to your left and see the scoreboard of Clinton, Sanders, Cruz, Trump, Rubio and compare their Report to the standard Principles of the Office we are running for with my own mentioned on the same Page.
You'll notice mine is mentioned as a Book Taking A Stand and is much deeper and thicker in substance.
The CRJ TODAY FOR A BETTER AMERICA TOMORROW would like to thank publicly with heart felt appreciation three contributors helping with this Motion. Thank you Nick from Ocala, Florida, Nancy from- Gilbert Arizona, and Larry from Chocowinity, North Carolina ! God Bless You for your consideration and willingness to contribute to this Campaign.
As you read the Motion below, Please consider a contribution Today for a Campaign and a Candidate that will not give up in serving Justice for All to all of you in our Union and Supreme Law of the Land.
Here's the Link to Contribute if you'd like to Cody's Campaign improve your record for Taking A Stand for the Constitution.
www.codyjudy.us
MOTION TO REOPEN and RECONSIDER
Here's the Link to Contribute if you'd like to Cody's Campaign improve your record for Taking A Stand for the Constitution.
www.codyjudy.us
CRJ TODAY FOR A BETTER AMERICA TOMORROW.
My Writ before the Court has not been denied. Please read these post for a detail of why my Forma Pauperis Motion has been denied.
Cody Robert Judy
D-Candidate for President 2016
The Challenge was issued on Cody Robert Judy's Twitter Account and sent to several Major Media Outlets.
Thank You!
CRJFacebookPres2016 JOIN US!
Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy Campaign
Cody Robert Judy
Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.
Web Site www.codyjudy.us
Keep coming back!
INSPIRING - I believe in You
Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.
Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!
Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!
Cody Robert Judy's book :
Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.
*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION
1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396
Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin
The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.
Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.
No comments:
Post a Comment