Monday, February 22, 2016

BREAKING REPORT: LOVE AMERICAN STYLE - Inside the Establishment's TOP SECRET Denial hating Americans

Inside the Establishment's TOP SECRET Denial hating Americans

Love American Style was a hit television series that aired from between 1969 to 1974 on ABC starring many legends including Ron Howard and Marion Ross I watched as a kid.

The song introducing the program was one of those if you got in your head you were done for. While the song was also something you never minded because it was "Love American Style", it just might be the key to the reason in a nutshell that former Florida Governor Jeb Bush decided, after one of the most well financed campaigns in modern American History 150 Million Dollars worth, to suspend the Campaign. Jeb said in April 6,2014 :

Jeb Bush's Statement of Illegal Actions being Acts of Love
"But the way I look at this -- and I'm going to say this, and it'll be on tape and so be it. The way I look at this is someone who comes to our country because they couldn’t come legally, they come to our country because their families -- the dad who loved their children -- was worried that their children didn’t have food on the table. And they wanted to make sure their family was intact, and they crossed the border because they had no other means to work to be able to provide for their family. Yes, they broke the law, but it’s not a felony. It’s an act of love. It’s an act of commitment to your family. I honestly think that that is a different kind of crime that there should be a price paid, but it shouldn’t rile people up that people are actually coming to this country to provide for their families."

Politico ran a story Feb 20,2016 two days ago entitled "Inside Jeb Bush's $150 Million Failure" by Eli Stokels basically blaming all of Jeb Bush's woes on his own Political Counselors failure to predict Mr. Donald Trump with commentary of the epic misread of the GOP Base's hostility towards any Establishment Candidate 'tragicomically mismatched to the electorate'.

"Trump baited Bush into a fight, staking out a position to the far right of the Floridian by calling for an end to automatic citizenship to any baby born in America. He ridiculed Bush’s earlier comment that immigrants who come to the United States illegally do it as an “act of love” for family, and called him unelectable."

Of course Trump was talking about what would become Jeb Bush's nemesis- U.S. Senator Marco Rubio and Bush's remark out of the conundrum of “anchor babies” in that he would be a tough enforcer of immigration law, but failed to pull the trigger on Marco Rubio as ineligible for the Office of the President because Rubio in fact was one who achieved his [U.S. Citizenship] by birth on U.S. Soil from statute, declaration, or constitutional Amendment, with foreign parents. The only claim of U.S. Citizenship was the line of the Border of the United States, but of course this didn't make Rubio a [[natural born Citizen] ie. Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents], distinct from congressional statute or adoption of [Citizen] as the requirement states or is allowable for U.S. Senators and U.S. Representatives.

Indeed the so-called 'Positive Spots" Jeb's Campaign was trying to maintain in high-ground were not working nearly forcing the JEB! Campaign to go negative infuriating the bur under his blanket Rubio.  The biggest problem with JEB'!'s negative attacks against Rubio, estimates of 36 Million Dollars worth,  is they did not encompass the moral high-ground of 'Love American Style' or the U.S. Constitution's qualification for the Office of the President.

[No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.]

The 14th Amendment was never a referendum meant to make the qualifications of the Office of the President found in Article II, Section 1, C-5 moot, and so the false narrative is exposed of those born in the U.S. automatically being [natural born Citizens]. Indeed neither was U.S. Senator Ted Cruz's claims derived from the Naturalization Act Nationals and Citizens at Birth Title 8 § 1401 a-h  upon his mother's U.S. Citizenship, but it gives everyone a very clear picture that [U.S. Citizenship] can be achieved by both birth or soil heritage and also what is termed 'conferred' citizenship or Parentally inherited.

One of the biggest problems with [conferred citizenship] is that, yes a baby at the time of birth can receive a U.S. Citizenship from a mother or father, but it has to also be considered the baby receives the foreign parent's citizenship in mutual respect making up the [dual citizenship also termed dual national] or with a fractured allegiance prohibited from the pure American [natural born Citizen]ship required for the office of the President seen in Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents.

 The Office of President was the only Office reserved as LOVE- American Style; as such offering a positive incentive to acquire the status of All American.

JEB! CAMP was warned or notified repeatedly but refused to recognize it as a national security concern. In two emails to Jeb Bush's Campaign from the CRJ TODAY FOR A BETTER AMERICA TOMORROW, the conflict was out-lined and the road to take but Jeb refused to [Go BIRTHER!] or in other words, take a stand for the U.S. Constitution or umbrella of supreme law Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz both violate with their failed [time credentials] to the Office of the President according to the American Standard or U.S. Constitution. Both emails were unheeded, and as we see disaster followed the JEB! CAMP rather than the hero status an actual stand for the Constitution could have earned him.

" The real weird part of this whole thing, is Jeb's love for foreign allegiance both Cruz and Rubio exhibit in their dual citizenship qualifications was greater than what he showed Americans of no foreign allegiance. Its really incredible to think about", Cody said, "but it really is something the Establishment's of both the Republicans and Democrats have not got through their heads yet as to the anger of the anti-establishments in both major parties.

"Americans want some reserved privilege as well incentive in total Americanism, and the Politicians wanting to be inclusive to all the Citizenry end up sacrificing true blue Americanism for foreign allegiances which ends in a sense of hatred towards Americans in the first instance- its not LOVE AMERICAN STYLE and the bases of the major Parties are punishing Politicians brutally for it. It hasn't hit Hillary Clinton yet, but I think it will."

Trump, who has never filed a single legal paper, or contributed a dime of legal help towards any Presidential Candidate with standing against any unqualified Candidate has played the fence. He has used the media to draw the attention to the matter, but has not trusted the Judicial Branch to uphold what we all learned in school: [natural born citizen is born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents].

 He has played it well as far as splitting hairs and appearing as an altar boy to the GOP Base who are angriest at the lack of political courage that has both allowed and financed Barack Obama for 7 years. Trump has pummeled Ted Cruz over his foreign birth and foreign parents, ( Cruz's mother is thought to have made an oath to Canada in order to vote in elections and work at the time of Ted's birth making her a dual citizen of Canada)  Ted Cruz's mother Eleanor holding citizenship in the U.S. at the time of Ted’s birth, she could have registered Ted as a dual citizen at birth, Canada by Native birth right and citizen of the U.S. through his mother’s citizenship in the U.S. however she did not register Ted as a dual citizen at birth, but rather as a Native Born Citizen of Canada alone as the lawsuits sprouting up contend.

The Parliament of Canada thus enacted the Canadian Citizenship Act 1946, which came into effect on 1 January of the following year. New immigrants were then required to recite the Oath of Allegiance for Purposes of Citizenship, which was an adaptation of the original Oath of Allegiance: "I swear that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to His Majesty King George the Sixth, His Heirs and Successors, according to law, and that I will faithfully observe the laws of Canada and fulfil my duties as a Canadian citizen- [grant of citizenship to a foreign woman married to a Canadian man after one year's residence as a landed immigrant]

Gov. Jeb Bush definitely had standing to bring the legal question to the Court questioning both Cruz and Rubio's official [qualification time] necessary to occupy the Office of the President should either be elected and to claim Campaign Damages from their pulling delegates away from his campaign, but he lacked the constitutional courage and political chutzpah although he did not have a problem attacking their political records.

If you just think about that for a minute you start to getting the idea forming in your head that millions of Americans also have. Why is it necessary to attack someone's political voting record if they are not qualified for the Office in the first place? Disqualify them for not being qualified and you are supporting the Constitution. Supporting the Constitution isn't 'bad for America' and is positive, but negative politics can easily be called 'going negative'.

It is difficult to address legally because there are no laws prohibiting someone who is not qualified from running. In other words, the Government feels the Candidates oath unenforceable. I disagree with that presumption, said '08. '12' and 2016 Democratic Presidential Candidate Cody Robert Judy because if the Candidate has certified himself or herself as qualified should they be elected to the office they are running for, they are binding themselves to the rules of the race with an oath. Stating there are rules that are unenforceable is an absurdity or just plain stupid.

 A false statement made to a judicial officer is a criminal liability under criminal rules of False Statements especially if the Candidate actually holds a Government Office at the time it is made such as Rubio, Cruz, McCain or Obama who were all U.S. Senators at the time they began their Presidential Campaigns.

The problem is you need an attorney general willing to prosecute that crime and these guys have tons of political connections and are willing to use them for their own political ambitions. Don't get me started on Governor Christie a former U.S. A.G. prosecutor.

 Jeb Bush as a former Governor was perfectly positioned to actually do just that with his own collateral standing outside the U.S. Senate, but we are to assume he did not want to win actually employing or using the U.S. Constitution for a stand.

Unfortunately, this leaves all the people who do not have 'standing' to sue out in the cold as far as remedy; and the presumption of enforcement willy-nilly or wide open to any one really wanting to run for Office who is or will become a citizen by means of soil or parentally conferred status, lashing out at the [natural born Citizen] requirement in the U.S. Constitution as a polluted term rather than a pure one.

Many people say, and it has been written in opinion, that the Constitution had a problem because it did not expressly say what a [natural born Citizen] was. Indeed, the reason based on the Founders and Framers of the U.S. Constitution who cleared the way giving Congress the powers of naturalization. They themselves were also naturalized U.S. Citizens by the terms of the Declaration of Independence.

They realized the powers of naturalization could not have any power over natural law, or the laws of nature. It was a false narrative or paradox to say that a [natural born Citizen  ie. born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents] could be [naturalized or adopted as aliens, foreigners or nationals could], thus any statement presuming such was easily proven a fraud.

Thus, the fact [natural born Citizen] definition was not articulated was indeed a positive format and not a misnomer of statute. This was the reason the 1790 Naturalization Act language of [natural born Citizen] was deleted for the 1795 Naturalization Act replacing it with [Citizen]. The acts of naturalization could not have any hold upon a natural born Citizen and these were indeed naturalization actions of congress as their titles expressed.

This is why it was stated in the qualifications for the Office of the President that 'Citizens' at the time of the Adoption of the Constitution were considered eligible. There were no 'natural born Citizens' even though many had been born in the providence of the early colony States, none were born under the jurisdiction of law the U.S. Constitution created so they were adopted in or there was a process of law articulating their qualifications.

Any articulation of citizenship having any force of including a member outside a society to one inside uttered by law is a statute, or declaration of law. In other words it is a compliment to [natural born Citizen] not to be articulated in law not a pejorative.

A [natural born Citizen] as written in the opinion of the U.S. Supreme Court in Minor v. Happersett are those of the Country born to Citizens of the country and are never doubted to be [natural born Citizens]

Jeb Bush just didn't have the political courage to take a stand for that. It might also be because of the endless whip lashings of the media towards Birthers rather than Article II Patriots taking a stand for America's national security concerns. Politicians live and die on stories written by the Media framed in the slants of negative and positive formats towards the individual.

If the Media felt that discrimination was involved instead of qualification, indeed they let you have it as Donald Trump was made the subject of in 2011 flat out called racist by the Main Stream Media in several stories: here here here  The media has never apologized nor has Mr. Trump been called a racist like he was with Obama with his articulations that Ted Cruz is not a natural born Citizen qualified to run in 2016.

As a personal statement Cody Robert Judy, the only candidate for President in America with a record to really present to the Federal Courts in a bi-partisan stand against both McCain and Obama in 2008 2012, and now 2016, said, " I've always simply stood for the law not letting popularity of a person stand in the way of the principle of the law. I think that's simply what Americans wanted. Its love towards them no politician is articulating. It just made more sense to me to let the chips fall where they did understanding that popular candidates fade with time, but the law remains unchanged. I've always invested in time rather than cash because principle holds power through times and seasons regardless of the storms of such that come and go. I'd rather have been known as a man of Principle forever, then as an popular impulse for 7 years that fades as a lame duck. I may not have slept or eaten in the White House, but my sleep has been sweet and I have dreamed in green pastures that are sweet to me."

"In the BIG BOWL of anti-establishments I really believe a new allegiance is being formed and made and those with indifference towards the U.S. Constitution will find their rights undefended when they feel they are needed most as payback or ultimately the harvest comes, and they reap what they have sown. We are all adults here; everyone clamors for the door of the ark that's shut tight, after the rain starts and they realize they are outside and not on the inside anymore. We're witnessing right now the tables being turned over. Former Gov. Bush's 150 Million could not buy anything of value. It was a total waste. I have the utmost confidence those with money will get the message very soon."

Cody Robert Judy's Motion to Reopen and Reconsider his forma pauperis Motion with new evidence remains undocketed by the U.S. Supreme Court  while it was resubmitted as per the last Post that articulated the criminal complaint to the Attorney General's Office against the SCOTUS Court Clerks for False Statements as follows. There have been no News stories covering this although over 300 Major News Outlets have been notified of it:


Here's the Link to Contribute if you'd like to Cody's Campaign improve your record for Taking A Stand for the Constitution.


My Writ before the Court has not been denied. Please read these post for a detail of why my Forma Pauperis Motion has been denied.

Cody Robert Judy
D-Candidate for President 2016


Thank You!

Cody Robert Judy Campaign
Cody Robert Judy

Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.

Web Site
Keep coming back!

INSPIRING - I believe in You

Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!

Cody Robert Judy's book :

Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.


1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts

12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial

13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008

14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case

15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.

No comments:

Post a Comment