Wednesday, April 20, 2016

Press Release: The Democratic Party Contested Convention - Three Candidates Remain

Press Release:
~The Democratic Party Contested Convention Taking Shape ~

 ~Three Candidates Remain~
Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders, & Cody Robert Judy

Much hububalu has been made about whether or not the Republican Party is going to have, or could have, with their Presidential Candidates coming in under the 1,237 Delegate Majority a Contested Convention in Cleveland. Perhaps because of the greater Media support for controversy stirring Republicans up against each other with seventeen Candidates, has the Democratic National Convention been featured much less as potentially contested, but it very well is looking like it with more than the two Candidates so prominently featured in the Primaries and Caucuses.

2016 Presidential Candidate Cody Robert Judy (CRJ) is a man who has done things before that most people said were impossible or insane that were really just different one might venture even trail-blazing. "He has a way of wrapping your head into a pretzel and making the inconceivable actually probable", said one of his friends.

When he announced in 1990 at age 23 to his extended family he was buying a 2.5 acre plot of ground in California and building a house and matching stable on it from scratch everyone wondered what bank he was going to for the construction financing? When Cody announced he wasn't going to a bank and was going to do it on his own personal credit cards whose interest rates varied in 1990 from 12 to 18% and he was building it all himself, that was labeled crazy.

Construction Building Loans in California at the time were loaned with a minimum of $1500 charge, and big balloon payments until construction was finished and long term financing transferred the loan into a 15-30 year mortgage. Cody told his then wife Jill he would have the house done in no more then six months for which he asked her and their three children all under 5 to live temporarily on the grounds in a 40 foot trailer he had purchased for $500, remodeled and refinished with a full size bathtub and oven included in it.

He avoided the $1,500 flat charge, the much bigger balloon payments during the building process making smaller minimums on the half a dozen credit cards he reserved for the purpose and got the Final on the House and financing in 5 months. When the bank for the long term financing came up to estimate the value Cody had actually accumulated in sweat equity over half the value of the property.

"You just have to believe in yourself", said Cody. "No one knows better than you what you can do and can't do. The world will always expect you to conform to what they understood, but 'they' are not you, and they will always say 'You can't', and then they will sit back and watch."

The story of Cody building his house in California is indicative of success in ways unimaginable at the time. Its' easy now to see the House still standing there pictured in Cody's book Taking A Stand -the Conservative Independent Voice at  and principled at Barnes & Noble, but it was a well calculated risk. Things worked out.

The story is synonymous with what Cody has done running for U.S. President in '08, '12, and now '2016 as one of the three Candidates left standing in the Democratic Party no one is really seeing or paying attention to, but Cody sees away to the nomination or away of doing things others do not see.
With half of the delegates handed out to Secretary Clinton and Senator Sanders one might ask Cody, "How many Delegates do you have so far?" expecting Cody to say zero.

The truth however is Cody like Sanders and Clinton in the Democratic Party with the way the party rules work can claim he has 700 Delegates already just waiting to be talked into his Campaign that Sanders and Clinton cannot official claim at all right now. They are as free as a bird right now and though they may say this or that, the rules state they can change, reverse, or hold their vote right up until the 2016 Convention Ballot Voting takes place.

What could happen in the next few months could be very interesting. While the Republicans provided a lower tier debate pedestal for near half of their seventeen that were recognized in the field, the Democrat National Committee had a hand in denying those who were officially recognized and declared Candidates for President from Debate in the Democratic Party and the Media had more of a hand in stipulating for qualification who would be included in the debate and who would have their names mentioned in national Polls. Most polls did not bother asking or including the names of even half of the Democratic Candidates officially declared in the Federal Election Commission (FEC) deciding for themselves who would be spoon fed to the public.

"It was and remains a very discouraging process, maybe even corrupt and rigged as others have labeled it", says CRJ. "It's pretty easy to poll at 1% nationally if your name is mentioned in a Poll", and as evidence of the slight Cody asks, "Find one single Poll of the twenty that were recognized as credible by the Media, who did not have access to the FEC database of [Officially Declared Candidates], did not have access to a computer to access web sites, video, commercials, and social media web sites, and who has on their Record a single question including my name in their Poll?"

The corruption or crime of abuse in this is all the money the Democratic Party and Republican Party predominately the major two party system in American Politics receive in 'contributions' from the General Public from the General Population Tax Base to put on their "Private Party Primaries" and maybe even some in Caucuses. State Legislatures often finance all [Political Party Primaries] from their Tax Base.

Utah's Legislature this year actually refused to fund that with a three million dollar bill, and the minority parties (that included the Democrats) suffered the worse in limping along with a Caucus System, that even the Republican Governor saw as a disenfranchisement of a very big part of the population contrasted with 2008 calling for a Return to the Funded Primary. [About 280,000 people participated in the Democratic and Republican caucuses on Tuesday. In 2008, about 430,000 people participated in a state-run presidential primary.] If the Democrats had funded their own Primary the cost would have been about $100,000 and the State Committee opted instead to fund Candidates and let the Primary drift incredibly into a dilapidated Caucus.

Nation Wide Tax Payer's ponied up over four-hundred million ($400,000,000.00) for Primaries in 2012 funding "Partisan Primaries" and under the system [all candidates and all voters] are suppose to be able to participate on a single ballot. So what does it tells us when Candidates for the Democratic Party officially recognized by the Federal Election Commission are not recognized on a Primary Ballot for the Voter's Choice?

It tells us that the tax dollars are being mis-used and manipulated by a very few and is geared for a 'select few Candidates', and fewer still Party Chiefs making the selection of who gets on the Ballot. It is very easily described as 'Rigged'. This is in essence the way a "Few" turn the "General Population" into a private funded enterprise which is a disgrace to the Republic and our Democracy.

Now, the burden is also placed simultaneously on the Candidates running for a General Election at varying levels to come up with 'Fees' $1,000-$5,000 and 'Signatures' that vary astronomically- Indiana asks for 4,500 at least 500 from every County. That's registered voters, Printed Name, Signature, and Address required. Imagine the ground game you have to have to get on 50 State Primary Ballots- Its' impossible for lesser known Candidates and it can be a dis qualifier for known Candidates who 'cheat' or are 'contested'. When you start going through 4,500 signatures and addresses it only takes a few to rule the whole pot is corrupted and fails nullifying the Votes cast in the primary for that Candidate.

Now after all that Tax Payer money funding your State Primary, won't you be happy to know that the "Personal or 'Partisan' Party" has, with their Rules Adopted every year, the ability to pick who they want anyway? The Democratic Party has 700 so-called Super Delegates especially designated to prevent a 'Contested Convention'.

Ok, sounds fair enough to prevent a Contested Primary, or actually function and get a Candidate in a tightly contested Primary. The 700 can weigh insurmountably two candidates and can still function within reason if say one of the Candidates is indicted on FBI Charges for, oh I don't know, 2000 Reports that were Classified leaking out or 22 Top Secret Reports blasted out to known enemies, whilst a Charity Foundation wracked up a cool Billion or even if another Candidate dropped dead coughing, or from a heart attack predisposed in elderly mid seventies. The party has still got to function for a Candidate and that can all happen in an OPEN CONVENTION.

The delegates selected in the States respective Primary supposedly held to cast their vote according to the state-funded primary, are all released if a sum of majority, picked by the Party Commission Leaders, is not reached, releasing the delegates to vote for who they want to. The Candidate in a OPEN CONVENTION not even necessarily participating in the Primary Process, if those who were on it failed in any way shape or form. These are avoidable contingencies that the Delegates go home to and lift their hands up about saying, 'We just did what we had to do with the options and time we had'.

The Electoral College System designed provides a fail safe method coming up with a Candidate even in the eventuality of unforeseen circumstances beyond the ability to reform State Primaries at great expense.
The function and details of how the Electoral College meets and how they vote was changed in the 12th Amendment. First, a discussion of the original plan, outlined inArticle 2, Section 1, Clauses 2 and 3, then what is different today:Each state chose a number of electors equal to the number of congress people that state had. Each state, then, got at least three electors (two Senators and at least one Representative). Electors may not be an employee or elected representative of the Federal Government. Each state was allowed to otherwise choose whomever they wish to be the Electors for that state.]

The $64,000 question remains; If the Tax Base of the general population is going to be funding Private or Partisan Party Primaries, what responsibility does the Private Party (ie. Republican, Democratic Parties), have in including, as the Federal Election Commission does, all the choices as far as Candidates to be represented for the Public to choose from in the Primaries?

What we are seeing erupt this year is an Anti-Establishment Movement propelled by the Anger of the Voter at the Establishment that's been festering like an infected sore, but even in this anger the "Choices" are being manipulated by the Party Elites and Big Money Candidates not necessarily the Principle of the People in what we hope is Justice for All.

As we see the Democratic Party, and the Polls, and Democratic Party Debates, did not even closely resemble the available Democratic Party Candidates for President; and there were not so many Candidates, as represented here, that a simple Ballot could not have been created very cheaply in today's Data-Intelligence-Computer-Ballot Box Systems. We now see only three Candidates still Active.

What we are seeing is an actual shafting or short-changed public whose choice is not Free or even Represented by our own FEC, by not including Candidates the Federal Election Commission has Record of. We The People, as the tax payers are funding Primaries and a very few are deciding for us with our money in the State Primary who we can vote for by not including Candidates officially counted by the Federal Election Commission.

The way the system of the tax funded Primary for any particular party is suppose to work is not based on the discrimination that is taking place today, but rather that the Public be able to actually choose from the selection of Officially Recognized Candidates.

All the same, the system as it is allows for a Candidate like Cody Robert Judy to also maintain an assemblage of Delegates that are not bound in a way shape or form until the National Convention takes place. In a tightly contested convention two candidates may struggle through the Primary and Caucus's of the State, and arrive to find the FBI waiting with handcuffs?

Such a Candidate who had bound delegates might then be influenced to for what ever reason endorse or recommend someone other than the presumable rival. In that case an unknown suddenly becomes a factor for what could be a whole lot of varying reasons and circumstances that might include JUSTICE.

The RAGE in and Against the MACHINE

It is no secret that Hillary Clinton's #EmailGate with profound consequences in the FBI and Justice Department are riddling her Campaign. Her private server confiscated by the FBI now have components leaked out to the Justice Department which are now subject to 'cover-up' or stealth maneuvers in the Federal Court that a  report by JOSH GERSTEIN covered entitled Under the Radar .
[Lawyers for a reporter demanding access to email messages and files the FBI has reportedly retrieved from Hillary Clinton's private server are objecting to a secret filing the Justice Department submitted to a federal court last month as part of a bid to keep those messages under wraps.]
Read more:
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook

The Democratic Party has a great dissension within it already as the Huffington Post articulated here in A Contested Democratic Convention Is Now a Near Statistical Certainty, but what can be contested and why are vague.

One of the many circumstances we are seeing this year affect millions of contributions is still what Constitutional Scholars have referred to as "Unaddressed" in the Constitutional Qualification of 'natural born Citizen' by the U.S. Supreme Court. Cody Robert Judy is the only Candidate in America with a bi-partisan Federal Court Record on this matter culminating in two U.S. Supreme Court Cases: 12-5276 and 14-9396.

Election or not, the Court has had at least two chances to hear the Case, and while that may be a small issue to so many in the Media, what remains the instrument of adverse antagony is the U.S. Supreme Court itself denying arbitrarily the forma pauperis motion and the Motion to Re Open by Mr. Judy. There are few things that fit into the narrative so well that the Democratic Party Establishment has slipped from the age of hippie love into the Elite 1% represented by Hillary Clinton right now.

The success of Senator Sanders in large part has been that Justice is not being served to the lower and middle shrinking class. What bigger exclamation mark do you need then when a poor person below the federal poverty line, is actually denied Justice in Court of Law in the interest of the Court hammering a $350 dollar Court Fee and a $4,000.00 Print job as reason to deny Justice, when the Public readily is prepared according to law to cover the interest of Constitutional Principle so many revered scholars are nearly exasperated on with the Court refusing to hear?

Literally Millions of dollars of contributions are be defrauded out of the Public Trust by ineligible Candidates. Its' not a laughing matter when the interest of the public to not only vote for an eligible candidate, but the interest in maintaining trust and integrity of the Standards of the Constitution are at large.

Sen. Bernie Sanders doesn't want to comment on Hillary Clinton's EmailGate because it's a on-going law enforcement investigation, but he has no problem commenting on Judicially Active and Unresolved Cases, by using pejorative, negatively framed terms, like 'The Birthers' to describe what nearly every Constitutional Scholar confirms is UNDECIDED by the U.S. Supreme Court! Sen. Sanders claims to want to represent the poor much better by not taking the Super PAC money, but what? He can't see an arbitrarily decided Motion against the poor in our Judicial Branch as a case in point, or is somehow dismissive of Justice in the matter of the Court hearing poor people's cases, because they can't afford the exorbitant fees of printing cost in the U.S. Supreme Court?

How does that story bode to Democrats? I can assure you if the Story is told it does not bid well and adds to the Rage in the Machine. How many people are affected by this injustice? The same question might be asked by asking how many people contributed to Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio's Campaigns this year in the Republican Party.
It's not just that the General Public is seeing right in front of their faces the inconsistencies but they are realizing that injustice is shattering their TRUST of Justice for All.

Their hopes and dreams, things they counted on always at least being there, some descent integrity, some honor, some courage for our U.S. Constitution besides the brave men and women who put on uniforms might be had in our Elected Leaders, shattered and broken!

Lies, and deceit, Fraud and conceit, have replaced right before their eyes in broad day light, the hope they had in a better America Tomorrow.

That is the reason we are seeing the Anti-Establishment movements that we are seeing in our Election 2016, and ready or not, Justice might just be right around the corner coming in ways you never thought it would come. Because when their is a will of the people, their is not bombed bridge, or blocking dump-truck that will stand, The People will find away!

Here's the Link to Contribute if you'd like to Cody's Campaign improve your record for Taking A Stand for the Constitution.

Thank You!

Cody Robert Judy Campaign
Cody Robert Judy

Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.

Web Site
Keep coming back!

INSPIRING - I believe in You

Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!

Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.


1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts

12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial

13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008

14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case

15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.

No comments:

Post a Comment