Showing posts with label bullies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label bullies. Show all posts

Thursday, June 1, 2017

DON'T TREAD ON ME - The Battle with Bullies Foreign & Domestic




-DON'T TREAD ON ME - 
The Battle with Bullies Foreign & Domestic

Cody Robert Judy Contribution save/secure Paypal Contribute Now for a Restoration of Faith in Justice or Mail your donation to:
 Cody Robert Judy 3037 South Ogden Ave Suite 1 Ogden, Utah 84401

Pushing against a Standard without the intent to change the Standard Legally, when that process is defined in the U.S. Constitution is essentially the definition of Bullying the Standard. This describes the process that has been used to subvert the qualification of the Office of the President in the [natural born Citizen] requirement as a Standard unique to the Office and different than U.S. Representatives and U.S. Senators, that is Citizen, now before the U.S. Tenth Circuit Court in Case Judy v. Obama 17-4055 and the U.S. Supreme Court in a hidden Application to Individual Justice Gorsuch.

Cody Robert Judy is no stranger to Taking A Stand for the U.S. Constitution. He has fought battle after battle for America's Choice in seating a President who was indeed without a doubt American defined by an allegiance of both soil in the United States and by both parental inheritance of mother and father equally recognizing those immigrants coming from foreign countries indeed need TIME to acclimate to a Standard of Law that is foreign to them from their Country of origin. But that is not the only battle Cody has had to fight with Bullies foreign and domestic as we will detail further.

Bullies insert themselves in high and low places in virtually every fabric and nit of society. Let's review a definition of Bully to remind ourselves the difference in Taking A Stand against a Bully whose harassing a Standard and one who is standing up for the Standard because they can often be confused and misidentified.

Bully - a person who uses strength or power to harm or intimidate those who are weaker.
Bullying is the use of force, threat, or coercion to abuse, intimidate, or aggressively dominate others. The behavior is often repeated and habitual. One essential prerequisite is the perception, by the bully or by others, of an imbalance of social or physical power, which distinguishes bullying from conflict. Behaviors used to assert such domination can include verbal harassment or threat, physical assault or coercion, and such acts may be directed repeatedly towards particular targets. Rationalizations of such behavior sometimes include differences of social class, race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, appearance, behavior, body language, personality, reputation, lineage, strength, size, or ability. If bullying is done by a group, it is called mobbing.
Those who are most susceptible to being Bullied are those who are weaker. That can be seen in as simple of a position as a 'Renter' and a Landlord' or as complicated as multiple corporations merging together to form a Cartel or Cabal in the order to push a desired and mutually beneficial goal of fleecing the little guy with a standard that conflicts with Law; or even sabotages an Election with Fraud and Forgery upon the Voter.

Recently Cody has had to take a stand with the former at the same time as he has had to deal with the latter because Bullies are really about robbing, stealing, pillaging, as a habit and until they are stopped, as the definition points out, their behavior is unbridled and encouraged with positive rewards. They get what they want by rolling over people often with a thick checkbook, high priced attorneys, and even Elected position.

In a Property Sale affecting the place where Cody is a Renter, the Landlords exchanging the Property sought to terminate (Cody's) renter's contracts, obligations to renters, and future rents that had been paid. As it happens renters often pay a deposit which covers damages when they move, but Landlords have been increasing these premiums to also cover first and last months rent. In a property exchange these funds can often be lost to the Renter as the new owner points to the old Owner Landlord for the reimbursement of these funds, and the old Owner Landlord  points to the new owner Landlord as responsible for all obligations of the Property.

This is optimally a form of Bullying Renters out of their cushion rents to even get in another place and let's just call it what it is - a form of contractual theft that most Renters neither have the money to fight or stand up against when educated attorney's are far from being afforded and they are looking for the Old Landlord in the dark of being kicked out on the street with no money to even move their property in what can be as quick as a five day process.

Many States garner the badge of being a "Landlord" State, where the rights of renters are minuscule and the motto for one aggressive attorney's firm is "Kick'em-Out-Quick". "Utah is one of those States" said the Judge in a case with Cody's past Landlord, in a forced move made on fabricated emergency measures to a different unit otherwise which had not been rent-able.

Today, June 1st, 2017, Cody filed a Response to a 3 Day Summons, served by a Deputy Constable, against him incorporating just such a Bullying tactic, which if not stopped, will be signed by a Judge in a zero day Sheriff's eviction, possibly as soon as June 3rd all because Cody refuses to pay rent twice- once to the old Landlord Property Owner, and once to the new Landlord Property Owner.

"It is probably one of the most scary predicaments to be caught between", Cody said, "Most people just get Bullied, lose their residence, have all their possessions confiscated, and find themselves in a homeless shelter looking around thinking what the heck just happened?"

'Avoiding Service of such a Complaint is not really the best strategy", Cody said, "When I saw the Deputy Constable Sticker with a return number on my door, I immediately called and set up an appointment for him to come by and serve me. I wanted to take care of the Complaint against me with the best defense I could. Most admirable people do."

Obama, the DNC, and OFA are not like that. They instead have chosen to avoid making a Response in a Case that has been served to their addresses that include Documents proving that the States of the Union were disenfranchised from a Qualified Candidate to vote for in the Elections of 2008 and 2012, also including legal and lawful evidence of a Sheriff's Cold Case Posse's multiple independent experts asserting, Obama's long form birth certificate he presented to the Public as identification was fabricated'. Indeed, the actions claimed would amount to exerting Fraud upon every Voter who voted for Obama in the Elections of 2008 and 2012.

In the action being determined in the Tenth Circuit Court Case, all the Defendants were served properly with a 20 Day Summons actually stamped by the clerks of the Court, and a Return Service was filed accordingly. When the Court Clerk claimed the documents they had sent for Service, in the face witnesses stating service had been made, the Defendants were served on record, refused to verify them, Cody Motioned the Court to do the Service themselves.

This Motion was denied by the Court. With Obama much of the Time, the Court has stepped out of the judgement seat and actually acted for Obama as his attorney. This is another Bullying Tactic the Courts have either used scapegoating behind the Clerks, or intentionally being bypassed by Clerks. You can use your best guess. Indeed, the newest Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court-Justice Gorsuch has refused to join the U.S. Supreme Court Cert Pool , perhaps for this exact reason and problem.

Indeed every Document the Court agrees to File on Record must come with a Certified Mailing Certificate also that Certifies the Defendants were mailed the Document. The Court is free itself to issue an Order to Respond or face Default, at any time, so it cannot also feel comfortable. So, has Obama really lost over 100 Documents mailed to him with Priority Mail or can we safely determine as the Court Clerks have the Documents Recorded, Defendants have indeed been served? The Docket Report is a Record of Service and Obama, the DNC, and OFA have chosen after being properly served to 'duck & hide' as a strategy.

These are the actions of a Bully who at the heart of the matter is a Coward and cannot face the music or crimes that are alleged. Certainly there are such things as 'frivolous actions' in Court like the parents who sued Honda for making a seat belt their drunken daughter (her blood alcohol level was .17 - nearly twice the legal limit) couldn't open underwater. Or, take the Case of one Plaintiff who sued Anheiser-Busch for $10,000 for false advertising. He claimed to suffer from emotional distress in addition to mental and physical injury. Why? Because when he drank beer, he didn't have any luck with the ladies, as promised in the TV ads. Harris also didn't like that he got sick sometimes after he drank.

In comparison, Judy's Case against Obama determines multiple U.S. Congresses have refused to change the [natural born Citizen] requirement at least nine times in modern history since 2000- eight of which are featured here. The Courts are suppose to uphold the Law of the People in the U.S. Constitution, not legislate from the Bench against the People's wishes which is America's Choice.

When the U.S. Constitution hangs on one side of the Scale in the Balance, and the Clerks working for the Court, or what can or may be, 'Working-the-Court', hangs on the other side of the Scale in the Balance, which do you think should outweigh the other in the Balances of Justice?

Consider Obamacare which is a catastrophe and sold with lie you could keep your Doctor and your premiums would lower $2500.00 while it rose to $4,865 and claimed 1/5 of the Economy.

Consider 554,000,000 Acres in 46 National Parks and Monuments Obama set aside during eight years which entail a bigger area than the whole Rocky Mountain States Area and the impact on America's Independence and even national security as nuclear subs are prevented from patrolling national parks?

Consider the 10 Trillion in National Debt that crossed Obama's Desk that amounted to an economical debt in eight years equal to selling every man, women, and child in the United States of America for seventy-thousand dollars?

Now, considering the evidence of a lawful Sheriff's Cold Case Posse, multiple forensic document experts, real documents signed by Rep. Nancy Pelosi contrasted by Hawaii's Democratic Party. If you are the Judge seeing every document has been sent to Obama, the DNC, and OFA, and the witness is Recorded on the Dockets across America in some 17 Cases by a Presidential Candidate with Standing in the Democratic Party, how do you call that frivolous and sleep at night?

See the Brief here read over 2,000 Times by people who have an interest in the Law.

See the Video the Judges have which has been seen by over 58,000 People.

See the Post wherein the Public has been prevented from the Facts by Facebook closing down "Boosting Ads" after some 11,000 People were informed and panic set in because the Main Stream Media has engaged in what the President of the United States now has repeatedly said was "Fake News".

Now, you tell me this action is 'wholly incredible' and 'frivolous' and it is very difficult for me to defend you as not being a 'domestic enemy' of the United States of America according to the Standard of the U.S. Constitution. Of course you can be fooled by Republican Rhetoric as well as Democratic Party Rhetoric as propaganda- Heaven help the Leaders found to be in the Acts of Treason against the American People who love the U.S. Constitution.




“One of these rattles singly is incapable of producing sound; but the ringing of thirteen together is sufficient to alarm the boldest man living.” Benjamin Franklin, The Meaning of the Rattlesnake, December 27, 1775

“… should we wander from [the Founding Principles]… let us hasten to retrace our steps and to regain the road which alone leads to peace, liberty, and safety.” Thomas Jefferson, First Inaugural Address, March 4, 1801
Cody Robert Judy Contribution save/secure Paypal Contribute Now for a Restoration of Faith in Justice or Mail your donation to:
 Cody Robert Judy 3037 South Ogden Ave Suite 1 Ogden, Utah 84401

 RECENT FEATURED STORIES IN THE POST&EMAIL
Facebook Ad About Obama's alleged Usurpation shut down
5-29-17


























Wednesday, October 1, 2014

Hero to Zero -Cruz 90% sure he wants to subvert the United States Constitution his Advisors 100%



Hero to Zero - Cruz 90% sure he wants to subvert the United States Constitution his Advisors 100%

http://www.americasfreedomfighters.com/2014/09/29/advisors-confirm-ted-cruz-will-run-for-president/

Its not just the fact that someone who is not a 'natural born Citizen' as is the requirement for the Office of the President, its the stating under oath that you are qualified and collecting dollars in a campaign from people who think you are qualified that makes those who run frauds, bullies, and domestic enemies of the United States by the standard of the United States Constitution.

Its really heartbreaking to see a hero become a zero in one fell swoop and an honorable oath becomes a lie, but that's exactly what U.S. Senator Ted Cruz faces in his decision to officially enter the race for U.S. President in 2016. Of course his greatest defender for doing such as a un-qualified ineligible candidate is Barack Hussein Obama. This of course completely turns every word U.S. Senator Ted Cruz has said about the usurper around and places him on the same side of the isle as those who support Obama in the Office of the President.

Of course Sen. Ted Cruz is a U.S. Citizen, but a dual Citizen which Ted Cruz is quite naturally, cannot be President.

"Tens of millions of Americans would be willing to vote for Ted Cruz; to strike him from the ballot on a technicality in an ambiguous case would be momentously undemocratic", but we don't live in a pure democracy. We live in a Republic with a standard that the U.S. Constitution actually stands as a standard for.

The argument from this article states that if the qualification for President is so archaic than why doesn't Congress change it? Well, McCain thought the same way and sought for a change. He managed a non-binding U.S. Senate Resolution because he, like Cruz, was not born in the U.S. . McCain retained a birth right citizenship from Panama and Cruz has inherited one from Canada where he was born.

There are some four U.S. Supreme Court cases that include in the equation, including McCain's Res 511, that parents are a factor in deciding along with birth place a 'natural born Citizen'. Like the age qualification or 'discrimination' as those who want to abolish the qualifications for the U.S. Presidency would have us believe, the qualification for President is different than the qualifications for U.S. Representatives or U.S. Senators.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ITCr420K4i8



When people ask "why" I'm astonished at the absence of common sense or deductive reasoning. Is not the "President" duties, responsibilities, and job requirement more than "U.S. Representatives" and "U.S. Senators"? Oh yes, the President commands the whole military and U.S. Reps and Sen. simply fund it. Yes, that is a big .. huge.. monumentally large difference.

'House Republicans are itching to pass a variation of the DREAM Act that would grant citizenship to illegals who were brought here at a young age by their parents on the theory that the place where you’re raised is more likely to shape your patriotic loyalty than the happenstance of your birth. If those kids are trustworthy enough to help decide at the polls who the president should be, why shouldn’t they be eligible for the presidency themselves?'

Of course the United States does allow Citizens like McCain, Cruz, Rubio, Jindal, Santorum, and Obama great opportunities to take a part in deciding the shape of our Country in the qualifications of the Offices they have held legally. Of course one of the great characteristics of a 'bully' is once he gets his foot in the door he just keeps on pushing and if you don't push back according to the standard of the Constitution as it stands as the law now, they just keep pushing.

Its not as if the qualification demands haven't been challenged and continue to exist as they are. McCain and company tried before in 2000 when the House Judiciary Committee heard arguments both pro and con, and decided to stop it and leave it alone. I sued McCain in 2008 as a presidential candidate as a violator and an unqualified candidate because he failed the 'natural born Citizen' clause for the President even though he was a qualified U.S. Senator as a Citizen.

Denying the differences of qualifications of "Citizen" and "natural born Citizen" really opens the door for any foreign president to also come over, become a U.S. Citizen, and take over our military crumbling us from within rather than attacking us from without. The Constitution serves as a very good burglar alarm with its qualifications and right now the Constitution actually testifies that in the order of a 'Citizen' to become President, one had to be such a Citizen at the time of the adoption of the Constitution.

Since everyone has died who was a Citizen of the Country at the time of the adoption of the Constitution and McCain and Cruz were not born yet, the law applies only those who are 'natural born Citizens' born in the U.S. to Citizen parents qualify. If one understands the checks and balances of our Government one perfectly understands the vital national security concern of the qualifications that are much higher in all three qualification considerations already established for the Office of the President.

Those who seek to change the U.S. Constitution have the ability to do so by proposing legislation for the U.S. House and the U.S. Senate to approve and than it is signed by a qualified President. Short of this process of altering the U.S. Constitution, those conspiring to bully over it are nothing but bullies.

One very important consideration I believe we all must ask anyone who runs and is not a 'natural born Citizen', (born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents), is why don't they if they are elected to a office in the House or Senate, propose honestly a change? Minus the obvious standard of changing the Constitution, doesn't their actions of not proposing such legislation actually show for you their own un-American character?

Where is the 'honest legislation' from U.S. Sen Ted Cruz to come in the front door of the Office of the President by changing the standard or qualifications of the Office of the President in the U.S. Constitution? If he is unwilling in broad daylight to propose such an 'amendment' doesn't it say to all Americans he is the kind of man who is more than willing to do the opposite to America than the duties of preserving, protecting, and defending the Constitution that the Office of the President demands?

Where is U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz's 'faith' in the United States of America if he is not about following the law? If its not about preserving, protecting, and defending the U.S.C. its just about EGO.


If you agree with us and would like to make a contribution you can do so here.
and THANK YOU!
Sincerely
Cody Robert Judy


You have seen the lightening in the sky in violations, now read the thunder that Taking A Stand is. Get it as a Nook Book now for only $8.49, or as a Hard Back Cover for 28.95 and or Soft Cover for $22.75.

Taking A Stand 2 Minute Promo Spot



Those wishing to read the U.S. Federal Civil Rights Complaint may now do so here now as it is public information: Judy v. Obama 2014 U.S. FED Case No. 1:14cv00093



Wow!Just found my book, Taking A Stand, on sale at your local B&N for nook users if you prefer over soft or hard bound - only $8.49 That's a Great price



Cody Robert Judy
For U.S. President 2016

If you think “Truth” is worth it, support it and quit supporting the lie. That is the beginning of change, or we can just keep on going down this road and see where it leads with Obama. Which is it going to be?

TRUTH IS REAL


The Commercial is simply called "America"


This placed me back at the beginning of the rollercoaster ride with an upset stomach and my choices were ‘quit’ or request the Court to serve the Defendant’s if, and as was the case, they didn’t like the way that I did.
COURT UPDATE

1- Affidavit for Certificate of Default

2- Response to Notice denying Certificate of Default

3- Request for Service of 9 Summons and Complaints upon Defendants by U.S. Marshal or other Court Agent including Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Debbie Wasserman Schultz,Mitch Stewart Jeremy Bird, Jim Dabaki, Matt Lyon involved in DNC and OFA.

Join the new CODY ROBERT JUDY FOR PRES 2016 FB SITE Here


As a matter of House Keeping I am pleased to celebrate with you another mile stone marker of 160,600 views here at www.codyjudy.blogspot.com . Without you this wouldn't be possible, so A BIG AND WARM thank you to all who read and pass it on.