PAINTING THE HEART OF THE ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENT IN THE U.S. CONSTITUTION

There was great commotion in what was known as The Great Hall as The Assembly that had been called was gathering. The Hall in brief consisted of some sixty rows of seats in height in an ‘L’ shape facing the speaking podium. When speaking to the hall the speakers back faced the near three stories of glass that rose behind him. Interest and speculations were being discussed as to the details of such. As odd as it was, even the great ones who were honored in the Hall from many different generations did not know. This “little known” only heightened the enthusiastic atmosphere. What was known by all, was the “Who” that was scheduled for the address. Every Christians eyes turned when The Lord and King Jesus Christ spoke.

His advocacy was like a deadly two edged sword and those who challenged him did so with their soul and utter existence on the line for he gave nothing less then what was expected. You could not presume him to put his soul on the line and then in challenging him expect to put half of yours up. His wisdom and understanding had surpassed everyone’s and time and time again he had proven to know what was best. All of the honored knew, for the United States, the Supreme Law of the Land was the U.S. Constitution; divinely inspired.

How could anyone forget the time David had been chosen out of his seven brothers? Samuel the Prophet sent by the Lord to find which of all the sons of Jesse the Lord had chosen. Even the Prophet was puzzled when none of the seven were chosen that were before them. He was utterly bewildered as was Jesse when the Lord submitted: “Look not on his countenance or on his height of his stature; because I have refused him; for the Lord seeth not as man seeth; for man looketh on the outward appearance, but the Lord looketh on the heart.”, long before David slew Goliath with a stone from his sling while all the armies of Saul had trembled at the site of the Giant. One might have wondered why the Lord just didn’t tell Samuel, “Hey this guy’s name is David and he’s the little one out herding the goats.”

Had something changed in 2500 years? Sometimes it’s not exactly easy to figure things as a student of the Lord. Why should the Lord deny Samuel the opportunity to learn a lesson at the same time? The story simply illustrates a point I would like to make. Often and so many times the world does not see as the Lord sees even though the world is actually taking part in the production. Like being in a play or a movie you don’t know you’re in. Of course you know your part and what you’ve done, but you don’t often see how that fits in to the big picture or story. And this is the challenge for you.

How does what you “do” and the part you’re playing fit into the big picture? How do you feel about that? And is there anything you’d like to do better? There is nothing insignificant about your achievements. They are to be honored as your life story. We for the most part know our story best, and while it might be seen as insignificant by others, the Lord looketh on the heart and considers things that the world does not take into account. So what are the things you are doing that the world doesn’t see that the Lord might be seeing more clearly and how big of a shock is that to the world?

THE MEDIA TODAY

It’s a wonderful life. You only get one that we actually understand now; one body plus one spirit equals one soul. Yesterday I wrote a note to Greta Van Susteren, American commentator and television personality on the Fox News Channel. Many might not know she’s a former criminal defense and civil trial lawyer. The occasion was actually a post I received of her’s from a friend to post on my FB Wall that basically was politically advocating in a type of campaign a transparency from the Obama Administration regarding Iran’s nuclear stage.

The reason for the campaign was so American’s could just be informed on the matter. With intelligence comes ability for Americans to influence their own Representatives and Senators. The results are accountability to the people. I understood her point very well. If our U.S. Government is in the mode of “We know Best” all the time and won’t inform us, and Iran decides to strap a nuke to an intercontinental ballistic missile and fire away at say New York City you got eight million American Citizens who are going to be wiped out one morning that didn’t really have a say in the matter as it was developing.

Who knows what could have been done different? Generally speaking Americans are pretty hot about Benghazi going down the way it did as our Government Officials sat on their hands, watched, and blamed a YouTube Video for weeks afterwards. Americans find it hard to believe that they can’t make a good decision when they are presented with all the facts. The problem is when all the facts are not understood or in the unknown factor when something very important is on the line.

To be fair here’s Greta’s entire post so they are not my words they are hers and my post comment posted to her post:

[If you agree with me -- please SHARE this post and ask people to LIKE my Facebook page so that we can continue to have this dialogue.
As a citizen, I want the straight story -- enough of this nod and wink, leaks stuff etc. fueling endless wild discussion by all. I want the straight story so we citizens can have a straight talk and make smart decisions. We can't do that without facts. I am talking about Iran and nuclear weapons. I just don't trust our government to make these decisions alone - I want to be brought into the discussion but I need to know the facts. I bet you feel the same way.
The American people should be told exactly what the US govt knows about the Iranian nuclear weapons program. Why should that be classified? What is the big secret? The US Govt can protect sources and still disclose the facts to the American people. And if there is a solid reason not to give us the complete straight story and now -- our leaders should be frank and tell us that and back that up with a convincing argument. We are not getting the facts (the nitty gritty) nor are we getting a convincing argument why we should not have them.

And why do I care? Because the issue of Iran and nuclear weapons is very important to the world and to the United States. For many, this is about survival and for all, it is about changing the world as we know it.
Without facts, we are all flying blind talking about it and that makes it impossible, in our role as good citizens, to encourage our leaders to do or not do something on behalf of us. Some leaders are even dismissive of us and what we want and hope because we citizens are not in the know. The "we know better" attitude.

Enough of the government's "trust us" mantra - I don't buy that anymore. We need to know ourselves so that we citizens can participate in the stewardship of our government.

I want the straight story now - whatever it is. I can handle it. You can, too. What we can't handle is being played by our government. Enough of the "trust us" -- I want the "tell us."]
A MESSAGE TO Greta-, Thanks for the post.(Referring to her request to post Alarm of U.S. Gov't knowledge about Iran in “they know best” mentality)

I would like to say more and more the press is seeing the harvest of not vetting Obama, and not standing for the common knowledge that the Office of the President not be vested in any foreign alienship for two generations- natural born Citizen ( Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents). This should be looked at simply as an age qualification that includes two foreign free generations by birth and parents.

Wise qualifications have protected generations of Americans and FOX has dropped the ball as much as any of the others and allowed Obama a pass.

It wasn't a pass of principle but a pass of division as the race card has been continually played. What's not fair about that and Why is it proved a Discrimination?

Well, as a Candidate for Pres in '08 and '12 I sued McCain first and then Obama - Records in U.S. Fed. Court. I have standing. I have a Civil Right to expect and demand candidates in the race are fairly and equally qualified according to the Constitution. It’s simple.

While I have continually had this in front of Courts requiring a monumental effort, the Media through not reporting it has kept and encouraged the Government's position in "We know Best" , now seen as a (the) problem to you as Press.

You are politically, through this post trying to get a story on what the Government knows through public support, but at the same time allowing them the right to hide it by not holding them accountable to what we even now know. What sense does that make?

Please, there a BIGGER STORY here Greta than Iran, and telling that story might spark the fire that protects Americans from the secrecy of which you now are so alarmed by in Nukes to Iran.

Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
www.codyjudy.us

I further “commented” on my own Post to a few Groups this:

[ Having others pass my letter on to her also helps her know you know. This shows a demand for the story too.
A lot of people don't realize this, but my main purpose is sharing this is for others to share it right back to her. It shows her you know these facts. It creates accountability.]
One comment I remember from someone was “She’s a paid actress”. I thought that was a rough one for Greta to digest coming from her background in criminal defense as civil trial lawyer and George Town University Law Center schooling JD. I actually defended Greta when I saw that comment.
[True Alice, but you know that even Actresses and Actors are people underneath every role they've played in right and wrong.]

Who can deny Obama has been given a pass by the Media, including the FOX News Network Greta works for? It’s very hard to see Greta pine for transparency from an administration she’s left covered in secrecy and ineligibility. I mean isn’t that story big enough Greta, or, are you like the reporter that only wants the BIG story she can’t have, rather than the BIG one she’s been given?

Why Greta would you even expect accountability towards transparency in and from a person in the Office of the President who did not win and was never elected by the demanding statutes afforded in our U.S. Constitution’s Art. II, Sect. I, Clause 5? Obama is not a natural born Citizen. You know it, he knows it, and we all know it. This is the BIGGEST STORY or elephant in the room. Reporters in history only dare to dream of such a big story to report.

Greta has had experience in defending people in criminal proceedings she didn’t necessarily agree with. That’s the job of a Defense Lawyer in many instances. Defending someone you know is guilty because you’re given or assigned that job. She knows and understands that side of law. Greta defended Kelvin D. Smith (No. 86-393) in a murder case in which he and others caused the death of Catherine Fuller by inserting a metal pipe eleven inches into her rectum in the course of a kidnapping and Robbery. You might think being a journalist was a little different than being in the Court room though and the ability to tell both sides of a story was given more latitude.

This hasn’t been the case when it comes to Barack Obama’s ineligibility no Court in the Judicial Branch or Legislative Branch has even heard. Of course I’m very familiar with those battles in Court having my name on not less than ten of them. So many people scoff at the ‘loss’ of all these cases and I have to think are they cases that represent a good cause?

Many a soldier has died on the battlefield fighting a battle he was just a small part of. He wonders at who wins and who loses and hopes he at least was fighting for good. He hopes his sacrifices were not in vein. He deliberates on being wounded in battles that were lost. Do those losses on the battlefield and the wounds received in those battles receive no honor? Do we only honor men with medals in battles that were won? Of course not; many heroic deeds and actions occur in losing battles the same as battles that are won. We honor the soldiers who report the actions on the field of battle.

Our national interest and vital protection requires a standing army and we honor those men and women serving our military and decorate them according to circumstances and deeds. How many military men and women would you say would fight to save the President of the United States life if he were on the battlefield himself if they were put in that situation and circumstance?

The honor of the Office of the Presidency is defined in terms within our U.S. Constitution as heading the Executive Branch, being Commander-In-Chief of the U.S. Military, carrying out the duties of the President, and preserving, defending, and protecting the U.S. Constitution. Many don’t know the important differences between enlisted men and the President’s Oath in regards to the U.S. Constitution.

For enlisted men that part reads and by the way is the same for U.S. Representatives and U.S. Senators:
“I _________, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic..”

For the President that part reads: “…and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”

The differences are in the words, “Support and Defend” and “Preserve, Protect, and Defend”. The obligation is much heavier for those in the Office of the President to ‘protect’ and ‘preserve’ the U.S. Constitution. It’s a very difficult job and what’s worse is when someone’s in the office that actually represents subversion and a perversion of the actual qualifications for the Office in the Constitution.

That fight and battle is not even being valued by the Main Stream Media or MSM. In fact, they are on the opposite side of the battle with a degrading term for those who fight that battle called “Birthers”. U.S. Senator Rand Paul runs from the term declaring “I’m not a Birther”. The interesting part of the protections the U.S. Constitution has inherently written in it which has served many generations well is that age particular to American service requirement in the ‘natural born Citizen’- Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents.

This does not represent a discrimination of any kind. It represents a time honored qualification of American loyalty. I often look at it as a two generation time requirement. Let’s say your parents are Citizens when you’re born and they each 25 years old then it takes you another 35 years to run for President. That’s a combined total of 85 years and really represents kind of a minimum. We’ve never had a President who was 35 years old. Looks look at Ronald Reagan’s age requirement as a natural born Citizen across two generations.

He was born in 1911 his mother was 28 years old a U.S. Citizen at his birth. His father was the same age 28 years old, for a combined age represented in 28+28=56. President Ronald Reagan became president at 69 and his age at plus the combined age of his parents represented 69+56 = 125 years of American loyalty after his birth in the United States. This is how you figure a two generation buffer from any kind of alienship or foreign influence especially considering the Office of the President which is the only office to have such a qualification. No foreign Depot lives 125 years so it’s a natural protector from first generation Americans that could very possibly hold foreign sympathies.

Obama seems to me the epitomic of foreign sympathies and the six years he’s been in office has been a great test for Americans half of which voted for him either not understanding or not knowing he was not a ‘natural born Citizen’. With an assault on the Office of the President only Presidential Candidates had standing to take this to Court hoping the Judicial Branch would at least hear the case. I also took McCain before Obama to Court who also was not ‘Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents’ holding both Republicans and Democrats accountable in the national security defense of the Office.

If you translated and honored ever battle I’ve lost in Court with medals like you would an enlisted man in uniform in the military, my uniform and decoration might look something like this, but the world doesn’t see this. They look differently at these things much like Samuel did looking at size and stature rather than heart.

The most vulnerable position in our Government is that of the Office of the President. The reason is because of all the power one man has. In the House of Representatives power is split into 435 positions. The U.S. Senate is split into 100 positions. Those positions encapsulate whole bodies that have to act in a majority within the Legislative Body. The Judicial Branch is split in many more Courts and Judges then even the Legislative Body. Appellant Courts like U.S. Circuit Courts and the U.S. Supreme Court have more than one Judge or a panel of Judges encapsulating their movements. The President’s position has no such restrictions and that was necessary especially in the absolute formation and readiness of a defense when a body of men cannot begin to come together in time to make a defense. One man's Orders are much appreciated in such times.

Paint the picture that God is seeing in you. Deliver it for others to see. In a reflection of Matt. 5:16 Let your Light so Shine that others might see your good works and glorify your Father which is heaven. I may have lost ten court battles but it is a fool’s errand to say that those battles haven’t been fought on the right or sound side of our national security interest or the U.S. Constitution’s provision and I am the only Candidate for President in America bringing the issue to U.S. Federal Court for both Parties. The honor is mine, in the service of my Country so help me God.

Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy
YOU DIDN'T KNOW HIM


BREAKING NEWS: JUDY V. OBAMA et.al., 14-4136 RESULTS OF POLL JUST CAME IN UPDATE POST


As PROMISED: ,I said I would keep you updated as things happen and discuss my case in more detail as we find out what the Court's decision is. I received this ORDER from the Court last night about 6pm. The results of the Poll taken by the Court on a rehearing consideration was negative America. The same Court that has honored individual rights for each American to 'marry' has rejected the petition for every American to have the same applications of qualifications applied when it comes to the qualifications for the Office of the President in this Rehearing En Banc.

This is a deeply upsetting and nefarious discrimination and outrage America upon all of our rights. Today, the Court handed down a poll that said they were not interested in equal rights under the law. A decision that said Obama is an exception and Cody's rights do not count. This is a decision that we would equate to turning back the clock and seeing the Court adopt acceptable forms of slavery based on color. Its a day when we see the Court rolling the rights back that so many Civil Rights Leaders have fought and bled and born the stripes. A sad day for those celebrating in Selma and a reminder of the fight that still needs to be fought.

A day has come to the Court Steps that the full Court has adopted 'elite' babies and rejected those 'poor' ones in an economical and judicial hypocritical nazi eugenics outrage! The Court practice of engaging 'Individual rights' in the same behavior or activity to proceed in marriage but that deny to me the same practices in which to run a fair race for the Office of the Presidency for which they have criticized me in their adoption of hypocrisy is staggering to the Civil Mind.

The Court has repelled the advise of the United States Supreme Court that a 'natural born Citizen' was 'born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents' so advised in Minor v. Happersett and invited the reinstitution of slavery upon the heads of every minority person standing in the welfare line with such sullied discrimination. It truly is a sad day for Equal Justice in America and I just don't know if America sees what is happening or gets it? Evan those opposed to me as a Candidate for President ought to be concerned and at the very least sustaining the Constitutional Qualifications for the Office of the President be applied equally to all Americans according to the Constitutions obvious and acknowledged responsibilities to that office.

The Order admits that the Rehearing En Banc was transmitted to all of the judges of the court who are in regular active service. In other words, appointed and dependent upon their jobs from either Obama himself or Hillary Clinton's husband.

Today we see the Court refuse to do that and dishonor the Office of the President. The Court refused to honor the tradition of "Justice For All" in America, burned the pledge of allegiance of all Americans, and blew the ashes in our eyes America.

We NEED YOUR HELP AMERICA now, to take this and report this ASSAULT upon your Constitution to the U.S. Supreme Court!
CRJ

We need your help. Will you help us or are the outrageous lies your being told by your elected leaders okay for you and your children? If you won't defend your children and their future who will you defend?

Get your questions answered by ordering Cody Robert Judy's Book here.

The 2016 Campaign begins now. Please send your contributions and help with the ABC (American Birther Campaign) today and my election for President in 2016 and Join the 257 of us now on my Facebook Cody Robert Judy for U.S. President 2016 site.



Cody Robert Judy for President 2016
3031 So. Ogden Ave. Suite #2
Ogden, Utah 84401

Thank you
Cody Robert Judy
Candidate for United States President 2016
www.codyjudy.us

CONTRIBUTION REVOLUTION



The Commercial is simply called "America"


Join the new CODY ROBERT JUDY FOR PRES 2016 FB SITE Here

CONTRIBUTION REVOLUTION -The INTERVIEW

After my new song was finished, I mean recorded and all, the video up today, I was really moved by a story seen on Birther Report that was basically an interview with a veteran journalist Diana West as she appeared on Andrea Shea King's radio show and revealed some stunning details about her time as a syndicated columnist. "She noted how when she wrote for The Washington Examiner they refused to run news articles about any of the ongoing court cases challenging Obama's constitutional eligibility."

As soon as I read that I thought about a line in my song which has been written, "Our Views are censored by the Media Whore ,She won't cover you on the News Room Floor" and I thought Diana's story was certainly a testament of that to be true. What would or what will hundreds of Reporters of the Media say when and if they are Interviewed after Obama has left?

Today I've had a lot of thoughts on what is owed to the "Truth" and what is the reward? There is of course my own personal reflection of what the battle has been like over the last six years on McCain's as well as Obama's Eligibility fight and a book could be written on each one, but I do have to say one of the very hardest things has been even surviving as a political candidate when such things as what Ms. West and also what Ms.Sharyl Attkisson is saying about her 'Battle Royale with the Feds'“Unfortunately, the government doesn’t always provide truthful information,” the former CBS News correspondent told the Daily Beast this week. (1-9-15)

I've been thinking about this for awhile now and how 'key' the press is in 'getting the ball rolling for Candidates. It's almost impossible to think about 'bulk emailing everyone' in the Country on a personal level unless you have got some major computer clout. Much of the public used utilities very strictly limit a 'user' and even censor you if you emails start to press over fifty recipients, but as a candidate you have got to get your words out there for people to at least consider.

We are much closer to being able to do that with the Internet especially if someone is 'searching for you'. The sale is often not so much what a customer went out for, but what she was brought as an opportunity while there. Ever run to the store for one item and come back with ten things you needed? (smile) Well, that's in essence what I'm saying. You need to rally a core base that you appeal to that can get the ball rolling. How is that most easily done?

Again, it comes down to coverage by the MainStream Media.If a newspaper reporter will write a story about your campaign every person in the city of that newspaper now is armed with a name and perhaps some motivation to go digging a little for a platform. Most generally, Candidates for Office get somewhat of a 'fair shake' when it comes to a reporter asking about their platform in a local or state election especially if the Candidate has anything remotely interesting to write about that might be different from the other candidates.The problem is nearly all the Media is anti-birther which is nearly like saying anti-constitution. That's really strange with 'free speech' and 'free press' hanging on by a thread. I've been made fun of so much I decided to play a little humor back. If you don't get this you probably haven't been a Birther very long. (smile) The small print says as a rule of order for anti-birthers "we can't stand people who use more than four words in a sentence"

EXPERIENCE WITH JEALOUSY AND ENVY

Now experience has taught me that most Candidates for Office, any office, are like little screaming devils running around screaming 'that's not Fair' if an opposing candidate get's any publicity or more publicity than they feel they should get. I learned that lesson very thoroughly in my very first federal election for Congress when the Daily Show with Jon Stewart came out to make a little parody about my running in U.S. Representative Race for Utah's First District in 2002. You should have seen all the little devils jumping up and down, stomping their feet and gnashing their teeth and that story wasn't all that 'flattering' to me. I was running as a low tiered Democrat and both the upper tier Democrats' and the Republicans were freaking out if I got five seconds of over-allotted time on a stump speech to Delegates and they really started breathing fire if a story was remotely flattering!

Candidate's for office have been called attention whores, but gosh that's what you need to get your message out. The tricks and the treats are all about getting elected and motivating people to actually do something as far as advocating or contributing to your campaign. I've certainly dealt with the 'negatives' of my running for Office, but after all of that people still have to say, "What are the positives?" What is Cody Robert Judy doing or advocating that even makes him think he's different than all of the other guys and so should be seriously considered for the Office?

Over the last thirty days, it is very rare that you don't see a story that has been written by a reporter about two or three of the people considering running for President featured on The Drudge Report. In fact its' actually kind of hard not to find a story about Hillary Clinton on there over the last thirty consecutive days and Jeb Bush and now Mitt Romney are running pretty close to that. Dr. Ben Carson, Sen. Ted Cruz, Gov. Christie, Sen. Marco Rubio, Rep. Rand Paul, Sen. Rick Santorum, and Sen Elizabeth Warren all have had stories there. I've never been a 'featured' in a story that made the Drudge Report. In fact if you put my name in the search engine of the Drudge Report you'll get a scolding that says 'Avoid using noisy words like FOR, Of,The, A , Not, An and so." That kind of puts what I'm saying in perspective.

The silencer that the Media has screwed on my barrel has been probably one of the top five most hurtful things to me personally and to my Campaigns that I can articulate. I just don't run for Office for 'me', I do it as a service towards the public good. That silencer wasn't because I had not "Done" anything but was in fact a silencer to what I was doing and the work I have been engaged in they have in fact 'agreed' or in some sort of a mean spirited coercivness towards not only me, but 'Truth' for the public, agreed to silence. The public has every right to be very upset, angry, and hurt about this silent treatment and while Diana West and Sharyl Attkisson have not threaded my name into the story, I definitely am in it maybe even more than they would credit.

Sometimes people don't understand what 100 hundred hours on a single web page means in formulating and articulating a platform that has essential and vital information for a Campaign and who bears the brunt of making that a product to vote for. I don't have a hundred people that I can assign a page to for a week for their best work and focus. The President of course has a lot of people available to assist and help in Cabinet positions, in Obama's case Czars. But what I'm getting to is generally the President steers the Country in a general direction and the details or minor decisions are handed down. Sometimes we hear criticism about a person who 'micro-manages' and everyone hates to work for because they feel they can't do anything without being told what to do.

Now the President's duties on the major list is in fact so important its' in the oath, " faithfully execute the Office of the President and to the best of my ability preserve,protect, and defend the U.S. Constitution". Of course we all know Obama really messed that up both figuratively and methodically in receiving and reciting the oath taken in as many days, but the point I'm trying to impress is generally the duties of the President are considered big general directions: Like, Let's go 'That way' and not 'This way'.

What does that have to do with me as compared to all the other Candidates or pre-Candidates for the Office of the President? As the President, or Candidates for President as we are talking about, steer in general directions they also have the eye or the highest perch for danger. For instance it is not out of the ordinary for a Candidate for President to have a position on the 'danger's of Russian Expansion' and the aggravations perhaps purposely orchestrated for intended result. That's kind of a big large foreign policy topic that could actually escalate into grave danger. I mean there is no question about that and I think every Presidential Candidate would agree they should have a position on that. Some might be the same, some might be different.

So, what is the Big Policy Issue substantially agreed upon by the actions and words of all the other Presidential Candidates that compromises our Country's national security placing all in grave danger? Does anyone think Obama has done any damage to our Country let's say going back over 25 scandals that White House veteran reporter Keith Koffler has described?

Of course,none of the Featured Top 10 Drudge Presidential Candidates have to my knowledge even acknowledged that there was a problem with Obama's not being qualified as a 'natural born Citizen' in public at their bully pulpit and I know for sure absolutely none of them have felt strongly enough about that oath they might take as President to take a stand against Obama in State or Federal Court. Now I really do feel that a lot of the reason for that on the Republican side was due to McCain's U.S. Sen. Res. 511 that literally every Republican U.S. Senator voted for accept McCain who abstained because it was about him. Of course that's kind of like not voting for yourself on the ballot, and if you can't vote for yourself I sure don't know why anyone else should have any confidence in you either.

On the surface it was harmless a non-binding U.S. Sen. Resolution but underneath it was the pit of hell Obama dug out from under the Republican Party that the rank and file had no courage to challenge as wrong. Of course there was only one person in the whole Nation of the United States running for President who was 'stupid', 'brave', or whatever adjective you decide to put in that spot describing my character to do just that. One of the biggest problems with being the only one,was a very fomented and almost rabid racist argument that the Major Main Stream Media Reporters assailed on potential candidates for challenging Obama. This was clear to everyone who had a dust-particle element in their head about running for President in their political future.

Normally you would think the Media would come down and interview me about these unique actions that actually held the 'Candidates' responsible for damages caused by being ineligible rather than a California Secretary of State or any other Secretary of State for that matter. To me the argument of holding a Secretary of State liable for a rogue candidate for President with the mafia as a party behind him was a little like holding your juvenile's teacher responsible for your child bringing home a failing grade. Why shouldn't we hold the child responsible for not doing their home-work? That is in a nut-shell what we have been fighting for years and years in the famed Birther Bunkers.

When you start gathering all of the evidence of Obama and what he has cost America so far is their any argument that is a BIG NUMBER and economically speaking there is just no way those who are in power now will ever be around to pay the debt they have placed on future generations?

I had a little different way of looking at the context of things which have passed when it came to a fellow facebook operative defending Mitt Romney as "a good man, whose helped a lot of people" running for President. If you just mathematically add up the people Obama has hurt economically, and realize Mitt Romney refused to support anyone's Court Action against Obama's ineligibility, or better yet initiate one as a "Candidate with Standing", (which many a Birther case has been dismissed because of the lack of "standing"),himself, you get the idea of holding Mitt Romney responsible for inaction and the massive cost that entailed.

Mitt Romney is really good with numbers. He's made money on cutting cost for businesses no one has thought about because he got into the details of pencils and staples that were being wasted. He is excellent at that, and he is an wonderful family man and he's done a lot for a lot of people, but the amount of people he hurt because of that one decision not to preserve the Constitution or defend it when he was the point man for the Republican Party has left a massive debt and a massive crushing burden on so many more people that he has hurt; that in a scale might be compared to helping all the people in one State and hurting everyone in 49 other States.

Mitt bears that responsibility and it was a choice he had every right, opportunity, and actually duty to make. That's a BIG policy or direction that being President holds one to and look what it's cost you and me and those who are not even born yet as future American Generations. Now to date, I don't think former Gov. Mitt Romney has really done that math but it exist as surely as Obama occupies the White House in the Office of the President and to discount that is truly an act of harm upon so many more looking to come into their parents life.

While no other candidate really has been put into that position of Standing other than Mitt Romney for the Republican Party, who was not ineligible themselves (like Sen. McCain who you wouldn't expect to bring up the subject due to the proprietary fact he was not born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents and thus got on his knees and begged his colleagues for U.S. Sen. Res. 511, that was kin in Congress to the one giving to him U.S. Citizenship at 11 months old as an immigrant as part of an amnesty act for those foreign born)Hillary Clinton does not share that comfort because she had every right and standing to object even as I did to Obama in Ballot Challenges and Law Suits asserting her Civil Rights as a candidate for President were being compromised.

Of course, most conservatives don't appreciate McCain now and would not argue that McCain's actions are as foreign as his birth. Indeed his own party brought sanctions upon Sen. McCain in Arizona because of his foreign drift. Hillary Clinton assuaged to be the original Birther beside Obama chose instead of preserving, protecting and defending the Constitution to blame the death of four very brave souls in Benghazi on the videotape and did an apology tour culminating in her utterance of her most famous words which might be immortalized in the engraving on her tombstone as "What difference does it make now!"

So, not only did S.O.S Clinton make the same choice as Mitt Romney in burying the unborn children in a massive amount of debt for generations to come, but she chose to infuriate and antagonize millions of Muslims against all the people she was sworn to protect at home with outright lies. I mean has ISIL had any better recruiter than S.O.S. Hillary Clinton? Yet all these big Democratic Party Donors are lining up to feed her Campaign a little more fuel to spew out on Americans? They really have to totally deny the fact that S.O.S. Clinton has done her best to kill them with her lies, and they want to contribute?. How many Major Networks have already declare radical Islam Jihadist the greatest terror threat the U.S. faces?

I do understand more and more the courage it takes to be a U.S. President and defy gravity at times or at least the crowd hooping and hollering against you that has a much narrower focus than the United States in the coming century and the preservation of freedom and liberty here for future generations. We are responsible for seeing to it the baton is passed forward. Those who do not fight for the U.S. Constitution in the eligibility requirements of the Office of the President are essentially opening or parting the red sea for enslavement and debt rather than leading the way into a new millennium of prosperity in freedom and liberty.

My new song is really dedicated to just normal people making a little contribution to the fight. We outnumber and surround all of the elected leaders and we can make a difference if everyone just gives a little. We shouldn't rely on PACs to fund entire campaigns. Many people contribute to their Churches in a charitable effort to help the cause of principle but much fewer view the political arena as actually effecting more people than the Congregation of their church. Without the freedoms and liberties of the Constitution churches lose their power to free speech and religious worship. Neglecting Campaigns in the political arena can be as harmful to a church in a charitable consideration as if you were paying to have someone burn the church down.

In the political arena, a little from a whole bunch can really make a difference and that is the theory that I've advanced in the title of my new song CONTRIBUTION REVOLUTION. So often a revolution is imagined as a blood scene on the battle field but it doesn't have to come to that here in the United States of America. We can have a CONTRIBUTION REVOLUTION and not have to fire a gun at our neighbor. This has always made much more sense to me and I hope it makes more sense to you.

The 2016 Campaign begins now. Please send your contributions and help with the ABC (American Birther Campaign) today and my election for President in 2016 and Join the 257 of us now on my Facebook Cody Robert Judy for U.S. President 2016 site.


CONTRIBUTION REVOLUTION



CONTRIBUTION REVOLUTION is about supporting and contributing to what you love. We all Donate and Advocate what we believe one way or another. Sometimes, a contribution is noted as not-contributing. The lack of support of Government Elected Leaders in and for the Constitution is setting up a Contribution Revolution!
WORDS:
First Chorus :
(Chorus)
Welcome, Welcome, Welcome Welcome
Welcome to the Revolution The Revolution, The Revolution

Thank you for your Contribution
You did nothing but set up my Revolution (Second Chorus)

Militarized Police The New Civil Army
Get Your hands up or your gonna be sorry.

Extremism in your Neo-Constitution
Make yo whipping boy for the evolution

Our Views are censored by the Media Whore
She won't cover you on the News Room Floor

The Frame Job Patriot seen as Narrow
Welcome to the age of the Bow and Arrow.

Repeat Chorus

You Jealous of the black man Doing what he can
Killing the spider on my plate
Shouldn't have been there he sealed his fate

Didn't give me no support Testifying your Offense in Court
Donate, Advocate, Yeah lend a hand
Giving to the cause for which you stand
For which you stand


Judy v. Obama is indeed in chambers and is set to be ruled upon shortly. I don’t know exactly when it was submitted for a decision as ripe by the Clerks and I don’t know how long it may be in chambers much like one doesn’t know how long it will take for a jury to reach a decision but we do know now for certain that the process of a decision is underway, that all arguments have been submitted and now are closed. The U.S. District Court Records submitted and a decision is now close at hand.

Cody Robert Judy

For those wishing to read the court action I have filed in Judy v. Obama filed in the Tenth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, Denver, CO. I invite you to here. I also would like to make an appeal to you for contributions which you can send to the address listed on the Court document to me if you'd like or you can now do that online at the web site now.

We need your help. Will you help us or are the outrageous lies your being told by your elected leaders okay for you and your children? If you won't defend your children and their future who will you defend?

The 2016 Campaign begins now. Please send your contributions and help with the ABC (American Birther Campaign) today and my election for President in 2016 and Join the 257 of us now on my Facebook Cody Robert Judy for U.S. President 2016 site.

Cody Robert Judy for President 2016
3031 So. Ogden Ave. Suite #2
Ogden, Utah 84401

Thank you
Cody Robert Judy
Candidate for United States President 2016
www.codyjudy.us



The Commercial is simply called "America"


Join the new CODY ROBERT JUDY FOR PRES 2016 FB SITE Here

National Defense Secretary Panetta extrapolates- Worthy Fights,-Not bad for Cody and his little band of Birthers

FEATURE EDITORIAL: The Post & Email
National Defense Secretary Panetta extrapolates- Worthy Fights,-Not bad for Cody and his little band of Birthers


The effects of reaping what you sow are most often not apparent until much later. Often seeds take time to sprout and grow. The general impact of Obama, 10 Trillion dollars later, and wars in 5 countries, 25 scandals and counting are seeds upon the American Population that undoubtedly will come to bear some kind of a reward though the concern is it won’t be the kind of reward many had bargained for.

In the reflections of the political arena there is little doubt that “Birthers” have been at the bottom of the food chain and media ladder and certainly off the recommendations of the administration in the White House for advisory positions and ambassadorships.

Obama’s ‘think tank’ has definitely been impressed not to employ anyone around him that actually opposed him. Yes, he may have employed some Republicans for appeasement purposes, but for certain Republicans in office and those most generally running as Candidates have been corralled in the administrations net in U.S. Sen. Resolution 511 excusing McCain from the qualifications of the Office of the President.

Of course ‘natural born Citizens’ don’t need Congressional Acts to certify their runs for office. McCain’s own conscience testified of his concern and in fact his witness not voting in favor for it. One must ask why McCain needed and embarked his fellow U.S. Senators to vote for such? Why then ask yourself the question why Sen. Obama and Sen. Clinton were sponsors of such? The picture becomes quite clear in the ‘corralling intention, and over all affect.
Obama/Clinton rounded up the Republican U.S. Senators in one twiddley-dink non-binding resolution. You either agree with that or the other option is that the Republicans had a bigger gang to protect even than Democrats in candidates who were not eligible and this played right into their hands, but you have to believe one or the other.

It really has been “Birthers” who have taken the best, or high ground, in modern day fields of Gettysburg. Paltry in numbers, the “Birther” influence on the high ground of the Constitution, while taking some time is emerging in history as mirroring the most courageous in the battle for justice and equality. The intentions of those opposed to it are clearly quite the opposite of just, fair, and well intentioned and are clearly centered in elitism, subordination of the law of the land, and contempt for the civil rights of equality protected in the United States Constitution.


In what may be the biggest lie in all of history the Obama Administration has been veiled in obfuscation, covered in secrecy, and cloaked in a black veil of feigned transparency. No portended husband has been so snookered in the promises of the bride’s beauty then has the American public with Obama more than 50% who actually planted the seeds of Obama’s corruption in voting for him; some perhaps beguiled in racist intentions, some perhaps wise and ready to implant the manipulation for short term gains.

However the effect or real time point is, nowhere is the effect more devastating then in the future of the United States of America’s children. The seeds of this corruption will not spare the cruel intentions of, to quote McCain’s admission, ‘generational theft’.

While ‘Birthers’ have been in the dog house framed in the worst of expletives, and the American Public not much better off then when Obama started, things might be much worse without Birthers. Yes, powerful witnesses in history are revealing the tenacious Birthers, almost as a silent alarm alerting authorities for the Constitution, have handicapped Obama much more than we are led to believe.

While Birthers might not have gotten the burglar, their influence and protection, their bark and their growl have been a weighty deterrent to what may have been much much worse in the state of affairs then what we now know. For that, the American Public can be very grateful for their protests. They have distinguished themselves as a guard dog for America for which the lives and children’s’ future may yet be hopeful.

The testimonies of these actions are only now beginning to surface and dawn upon the American public. In an October 13th, 2014 article by Jack Cashill entitled “Panetta Book Bombshell: Challenges to Obama’s Legitimacy Affected His Presidency”, former Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta is referenced as follows:

“Largely lost in the hubbub over former Defense Secretary Leon Panetta’s new book Worthy Fights is one intriguing revelation. As reported in the New York Times, the accusations that Barack Obama was not what he appeared to be, perhaps not even a natural-born citizen, caused him to become tentative on the national stage. “Those challenges have encouraged the president’s caution and defensiveness, which in turn has emboldened further challenges,” Mr. Panetta wrote.

http://www.americanthinker.com/2014/10/panetta_challenges_to_obamas_legitimacy_affected_his_presidency.html

What a patriotic and welcome compliment for me and my little band of Birthers coming from a man whose roots are/were very deeply involved in America’s national security.

Can anyone doubt the staggering and transparent witness of man so close to America’s national security that Birthers have not been a guard dog? However,even within the Birther rank and file there have been contentious battles fought. The greatest of these have been cries that McCain was qualified and so was Cruz, Rubio, Jindal, and (Santorum ?), when they were not ‘natural born Citizens. These were/are largely charged with political power pity-party cries fearing that if they didn’t or don't join the rank and file of the Democrats they would be left behind. The only problem I see with that is that both R's and D's are contributing to their record and defining their character of actually abandoning the Constitution substantially demanding Americans congregate under an Independent banner in the political arena more especially for 2016.

The 14th Amendment has been used like a gatling gun to mow anyone down who said that the unique qualifications for the Office of the President in ‘natural born Citizen’ was distinct from the qualifications of ‘Citizen’ mentioned in the 14th Amendment required for U.S. Representatives and U.S. Senators, and if that didn’t work the term ‘racist’ has worked well for those who supported and opposed Obama but gave or delivered to McCain in 2008 and the gang of ineligible Republicans gathering at the starting line of the 2016 race for the Presidency a free pass.

The term “Standing” has been used like an RPG to blast most Birther Court filings away by Obama’s own attorneys. The term was indicative of someone who wasn’t in the race for President and so lacked credentials to call foul on Obama’s eligibility. Remarkably only one man in America stands to the square in the Birther Movement having a record, both amiable of standing in a bipartisan defense of the Constitution as a Presidential Candidate in 2008 and 2012 as well as 2016 having the battle scars of this incredible battle.

The racist insinuation doesn’t work on him because he first filed against McCain and the RNC in Las Vegas Nevada’s Federal Court trying hard to bring the ‘conservative arm’ of the political arena back into lines procured in the United States Constitution for the Office of the President. His political weight has been wielded like a sword in Amicus Curiae’s for Democrat Phil Berg who filed and got the first case into the United States Supreme Court, as well as a Amicus Curiae filed in defense of Lt. Col. Surgeon Terry Lakin who was hung out to dry by the military Court for refusing orders based on the assertion the chain of command had been breached in Obama’s ineligibility, which as a C.I.C does hold a constitutional basis in fact.

In 2010 a jury was selected in a 10th Amendment sanctioned trial from a panel of citizens that come from all over the United States of America in the Obama CIA Columbia Sedition and Treason Trial . Cody Robert Judy (I) became the the first candidate in American History to take an oath and swear on the Bible that his testimony in the Court was true and correct as a Candidate for President testifying that both McCain and Obama were not eligible for reasons of not being ‘natural born Citizen(s)’ as was required by the United States Constitution. Incredibly, the Jury of American Citizens from all walks of life and states in the Union with my testimony and the evidences and facts presented in the case held in New York found Obama guilty.

In 2012 from the onslaught of the Iowa Caucus, Democrats heard of my name, Cody Robert Judy as a Democratic Party Candidate for President opposing Obama, and the facts surrounding Obama as an ineligible unqualified candidate for the Office of the President by the standards of the Constitution. The rallying cry barreled onto the east coast in New Hampshire’s primary all the way to the State’s Supreme Court, and then traveled down to the now famous stand in Georgia where Obama being subpoenaed by a judge in the Administrative Court flatly refused to show up and was told by the Secretary of State in Georgia that if he chose that route, he did so at his own peril. Truly Obama is not out of the woods yet.

In March 2012 Georgia and Cody Robert Judy (I) were the first ones to put two and two together presenting and submitting hard evidence to the George State court conveyed in Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse’s Investigation declaring Obama’s identification documents (long form birth certificate Obama presented to the White House Press Core for distribution and also Obama’s draft registration) were forgeries fabricated, and that evidence was maintained in presentments to the Georgia Supreme Court and then on to the United States Supreme Court originating as a Ballot Challenge.

One might pontificate that such hard evidence presented to sound legal minds grounded in the defense of justice wielding a standard held fast in the United States Constitution might gasp and shutter at the audacity of moral neglect and outrages of law that common folks could understand and illegal aliens were quite accustom in court proceeding to, but if one thing has been taught to the American People in the Obama administration it is that “elitism” is favored, equality shunned, and a good ole boys club continues in favors of greenback pats on the back. If you followed the money trail you see at the time Georgia received two very big federal contracts.

Decay in confidence, a tryst in trust, and a disparagement of hope are seeds of a dictatorial Obama that have been planted as foreign goods in our domestic soil. The hope of America was to leave such across the sea and to find a land of milk and honey wherein the Supreme Law of the Land in the U.S. Constitution reigned supreme in the Republic for which we stand. That hope and change has been anointed in the blood of America’s battle ground, for slaves and subjects that found a nation fighting for equal civil rights as citizens of the Union and all Obama has done is rooted in the wrecking ball, squalor, and disrespect for us as American’s and our principles of law.

The common decency towards all Americans has been exposed in a ruling class of elitism that favors corruption with a promise of transparency that now has been exposed as a noose of hate and one continuous lie camouflaged and veiled in blackness rather than light. This is not an example of race ethnicity, or religion, but one of truth Obama has avoided in the foundations of his character. It is weakness and does not strengthen America but makes America weaker. Embracing Obama’s actions of deceit is a call for truth to come and find you if it can. Rest assured the light will find and penetrate the darkness and the darkness will be pushed out by the light.

A walking talking violation of the qualifications for the Office of the President might serve as a wake-up call for all Americans, but it is in no way shape or form is nearly strong enough to transform America. America’s transformed in the light of truth and equality: This is my stand- This is what I have fought for very plain and simply in our Republic. There has never been a stand I have made in protest that didn’t represent a stand for truth and light against a veil of darkness.

Privacy exists, and American’s are constantly reminding the Government that they do not want the Government in their private places, but privacy does not exist on a level for corruption of Government; and that is the extent that it has come to. In my Judy v. Obama 2014 Case 1:14-cv-00093 (Utah- U.S. Division) that I am appealing to the 10th Circuit Court in Denver I am fighting the Courts agreement with Government unaccountability cloaked in the word ‘immunity’.

Immunity was never a word given to Government so that Government could do anything they wanted to you including raping, pillaging, and robbing you of all your rights in said U.S. Constitution; and as it has been interpreted as such the American People are threatened with being wiped out as citizens. Immunity doesn’t cover Rep. Nancy Pelosi in the deliberate deceit /crime in knowingly using her office as a laundry unit for submitting fraudulent documentation about Obama to Hawaii any more then it would cover her from walking out with an oozy and slaughtering all voters coming out from the voting booth after casting their ballot. Gun violence pales in comparison to the nuclear effect of her pen and signature on that document.

Citizen’s verses slaves/subjects is sadly what Judy v. Obama is all about, and I say sadly because the man in the White House office of the President is not the one fighting for the civil rights of citizens, it is me. The color of one’s skin and the place of one’s office has nothing to do with the character of the heart; and while Obama’s face might be recognized by a lot more people on the planet, his heart is the sorrow of all of heaven more especially to those who plead at God’s Mercy and Judgment seat that their blood has not been spilt in vein nor their cause neglected.

Fast, friendly, and convenient in America does not give McDonald’s a license to serve a cow-pie burger in place of real beef. The hope of the Obama Administration and those who support him is that you’ve been fed so much of the one that you don’t know the difference from the other.

If you agree with us and would like to make a contribution you can do so here.
and THANK YOU!
Sincerely
Cody Robert Judy


You have seen the lightening in the sky in violations, now read the thunder that Taking A Stand is. Get it as a Nook Book now for only $8.49, or as a Hard Back Cover for 28.95 and or Soft Cover for $22.75.

Taking A Stand 2 Minute Promo Spot



Those wishing to read the U.S. Federal Civil Rights Complaint may now do so here now as it is public information: Judy v. Obama 2014 U.S. FED Case No. 1:14cv00093



Wow!Just found my book, Taking A Stand, on sale at your local B&N for nook users if you prefer over soft or hard bound - only $8.49 That's a Great price

Cody Robert Judy
For U.S. President 2016

If you think “Truth” is worth it, support it and quit supporting the lie. That is the beginning of change, or we can just keep on going down this road and see where it leads with Obama. Which is it going to be?

TRUTH IS REAL

The Commercial is simply called "America"


This placed me back at the beginning of the rollercoaster ride with an upset stomach and my choices were ‘quit’ or request the Court to serve the Defendant’s if, and as was the case, they didn’t like the way that I did.
COURT UPDATE

1- Affidavit for Certificate of Default

2- Response to Notice denying Certificate of Default

3- Request for Service of 9 Summons and Complaints upon Defendants by U.S. Marshal or other Court Agent including Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Debbie Wasserman Schultz,Mitch Stewart Jeremy Bird, Jim Dabaki, Matt Lyon involved in DNC and OFA.

Join the new CODY ROBERT JUDY FOR PRES 2016 FB SITE Here


As a matter of House Keeping I am pleased to celebrate with you another mile stone marker of 160,600 views here at www.codyjudy.blogspot.com . Without you this wouldn't be possible, so A BIG AND WARM thank you to all who read and pass it on.

BREAKING UPDATE OBAMA INELIGIBILITY: What is your ‘Brand’ or “Label” of American Patriotism Gwyneth Paltrow?

FEATURED EDITORIAL: The Post & Email
BREAKING UPDATE ON OBAMA INELIGIBILITY
What is your ‘Brand’ or “Label” of American Patriotism Gwyneth Paltrow?

You know I’ve been so upset the last week over some developments on my law suit against Obama/the DNC/ and the Obama Campaign Fund Raising corporations OFA combining to overthrow the U.S.C. Qualifications for President and in such over throw in a coup the U.S. Government under the standard of the United States Constitution I haven’t even been able to write about it.

I just responded to a POST made by Bill Sharpe in a “Friends of Liberty” FB Group. His Post went something like this:
[ What all American citizens need to do, is to file a law suit against Barack Obama (if that’s his real name) and the Democratic Party for endangering every American citizen life, for putting every American citizen’s life in jeopardy for allowing illegal’s to come into this country and bring weapons of mass destruction (biological weapons of mass destruction) into the United States, and then distributing these individuals in undisclosed locations across the United States. Anyone who has lost a loved one should contact her District Attorney’s Office, or the Atty Gen. in their state, and file murder charges against Barack Obama (if that’s his real name) and the entire Democratic Party, if they contributed to the death of your loved ones or children they should be held liable!!!!!!!]

My response:
“Well, I got mine filed…But I’ll tell you from 7 years experience with exactly this; You’ll get dismissed for a lack of standing. Even better why not support people who won’t get dismissed. It cost $1,000’s of dollars to get a law suit off the ground to start with. Doesn’t contributing a few hundred make more sense? If Americans really want a change they have to support one. To Date, they have not.” (link)

People all upset about all these ‘Cover-ups’ and ‘Scandals’ haven’t contributed a single dollar to a candidate who has fought for the U.S.C. on both sides of the isle. I filed against McCain and Obama as a Pres. Can. W standing. The Media angle is very important to consider. If you fight against Obama’s eligibility you have to fight Cruz’s and McCain’s as well or you are a racist. The facts don’t lie. Do Americans’ really care about it? Those who say they care haven’t contributed $1. You know if you could find 500,000 people who care and would contribute $1, you’d find Congress paying a lot more attention. There’s 300 Million Americans and we can’t find 500,000 to contribute a single dollar? Nope..”

IS IT REALLY A LOSS OF A LOVED ONE OR THE MURDER OF A FRIEND YOU’RE LOOKING FOR TO MOVE?


If your Patriotism is tied to a ‘Band’ or ‘Label’ like ‘Republican’ or ‘Democrat’, you can’t win because you have all these leaders who are compromised. They are entrenched to money, much of it foreign money that is earned here, sent over there, and then returns to support candidates like Obama. You all know his Harvard Education is thought to be financed by a 20 million dollar grant from S.R’s, and he sure didn’t have the grades to get into Columbia from Occidental with a C+ average and there’s a lot of evidence to circulated support that a ‘foreign student’ entry forum was used to get Obama in though no college transcripts have ever been released.

Bottom line is you don’t need college entrance papers proving a foreigner exist in the White House. I mean we have Obama’s own word on his long form Birth Certificate his father was not a citizen at the time of Obama’s birth. To be a ‘natural born Citizen’ both being born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents is considered in the context of most cases in the U.S. Supreme Court the primary precedent case being Minor v. Happersett.

Now if you forget about all that and excuse it, not because it’s the right thing to do but because you just don’t care that much for arresting the fundamental abuse of civil rights upon candidates for President like myself who has stood up tooth and nail be it against Republican or Democrat Candidate Ineligibility, then you are left with a law enforcement’s legal investigation.

That investigation revealed complete forgeries of the short and long form birth certificates as well as a forged draft registration on Barack Obama aka Barry Soetoro. Bill Sharpe’s request in his post has been adequately represented by legally qualified persons but it hasn’t worked and I think the biggest reason it hasn’t worked is because Americans’ fundamental patriotism is severely and justly called into question.

I mean if you just took the Tea Party People into consideration. They have the ability to raise a lot of money and contact well over a million people. They have the ability to get behind a Presidential candidate who could not be called a ‘racist’ on the integrity of the record like mine, but they just refuse to do it. What can you say about that?
We can get mad at Judges and all of that, but do you really think Judges don’t notice things like your lack of patriotic support?

I don’t think you can find a Presidential Candidate in the whole USA that has a better record, a more sound record for taking a stand on the ineligibility issue of the Office of the President. I chose the record because I could see clearly if you get that office you can fundamental transform American just as Obama saw. Obama wasn’t alone in seeing that.

Sen. Hillary Clinton sponsored the U.S. Sen. Res. 511 for McCain along with then Sen. Obama in 2008 which led to a defeat of Mitt Romney in 2012 for failing to take a stand on the Office of the President’s qualifications. Can we even figure out the cost of that now? I mean it has to rank somewhere in history to the cost of The Tower of Babel which was a completely foolish endeavor from the start, but they kept building on it until God himself put a stop to it.

Yes, I think it would be extremely nice if God decided to strike deaf and dumb the Judge in my cases because clearly they are not defending the United States Constitution in calling my case filed in 2014 Judy v. Obama “frivolous or malicious” which was the argument for the ‘MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS’.

Mind you, this decision and the argument for it has come weeks after the complaint was notably served upon the Plaintiff’s, just like I served the McCain Law Suit in 2008, and the Defendant’s failed to respond leading to a “Default Judgment” by execution of the reasonable parameters of time given to the Defendant’s by a Court issued 20 Day Summons. This all comes down to the Court’s unwillingness to actually play by their own rules which is what happens when you don’t hold people in office to the same accountability standard of the law. They become ‘immune’; another word for that is ‘elitism’, and yet another word for it is ‘royalty’ something we have assumed to be against, but as transparently awkward as it is seems to be is disingenuous of the actual standard of the law enforced.

In truth it meets very precisely the exact abuses that constituted the need or reason for our very own American Revolution.

Not only did the Court refuse to acknowledge the three witnesses in Affidavits of the Service of Process,, and the failure to respond resulting in a Default, but the Court refused then to carry out the service as it is obligated to itself.

The logic the Court used was indeed a presumption of “the failure to succeed in prosecuting” the Plaintiff’s due to “their immunity under the color of law”. In this instance what that means is Rep. Nancy Pelosi and U.S. Sen. Harry Reid can say and do anything they want to get their candidate on the Ballot regardless of the person’s eligibility for the Office. No, it’s not right. Life isn’t fair, but fairness and equality are not about what Obama is all about. It’s just the opposite and if fraud and forgery are not your witnesses brought to the Court as I brought in Sheriff Joe’s Law Enforcement Investigation, as a secondary witness to the already violated U.S.C.’s order of qualification for the Office of the President, than you have to figure the Government is on an unlawful heist of epic proportions.

Not to be outdone however is the shear unwillingness for Patriotic Americans to simply pour in money to solve a problem. I’ve seen millions of dollars raised by Americans who finally see a cause worth supporting in nothing short of a weeks’ time. The problem is reaching the millions of Americans who would care.

Republicans and Democrats aren’t going to split easily with their treasured political war chest and the Tea Party Leaders seem bent on supporting candidates who like U.S. Mike Lee here in Utah refuse to talk about the ineligibility issue and lawful documentation of fraud and forgery. I am not sure, “knowing who did the forgeries” as far as Obama’s Identification fabrications, is as important as the fact that he has used them.

Yes, this is a complete and utter diabolical disaster happening right now in American in front of your face! Yes, you have available to you a Presidential Candidate who has honorably and notably in a legal record stood up for it against both Republicans and Democrats representing a sound standard of equality that is not racist. No, you have not supported that at all!

Are you liable as Americans for this? The sad truth is “yes”. I don’t know that I can tell God any different could you if you were in my position? I mean, if you believe in God. If you believe God has founded this Nation. If you believe borders are important. If you believe the Constitution is important. If you believe the scandals and murders of border agents and those at our embassy are not to be swept under the carpet. The crux of this exists in Obama’s ineligibility like the base of a tree exists as the main foundation for the branches. Get off the branches and get back to the base of the tree if you want to chop it down. When you chop it down all the branches fall.

This order was signed by the Judge October 7th and I have 10 days to appeal that decision to the 10th Circuit. Should I appeal it? I’m asking you?

Are you willing to send $2000 or $1,000, or $100 or $50 or $25 or $10 or $1 in exhausting the effort to lawfully handle the circumstances or have you also given up? If you don’t believe in the record I have to offer, what good is it to me?
If you don’t have the intestinal fortitude to stand up, pass on, and contribute this request like a fire across the Nation what sort of Patriots are you? Certainly you desire more defending your children out the window with your rifles and just shooting the zombies walking towards your house with diseases and forged passports? Certainly you’re inviting with your actions the kind of plagues and wars that will enter your own back yards and neighborhoods and you ‘think’ that won’t ‘cost’ you anything?

It’s going to cost you a lot more then getting off your rear end and passing this on with your social media bull horn this post and passing the contribution hat and getting those dollars to me in this patriotic cause for all of us. If you can’t do that, please, just look at yourself in the mirror and tell yourself that you are a loser and have given up on the United States of America.

I’m not sure that if God were to strike the judge deaf and dumb, until he reversed his decision, that you would be satisfied because ultimately you’re not paying anywhere near the price that is going to be required of you and if that is the case you deserve it just as much as the Judge does right?

Yes, it is a little bit of what we call “your own medicine”, but it’s not like the good Lord is not willing to give you a little sugar for the medicine to go down. Our Constitution is wonderful! Our freedom and liberty are bastions of light in a stormy sea. Those who have become so cynical and apathetic that they have given up on supporting a ‘good cause’ which centers and focuses with pin point precision on the trunk of the tree of Obama’s ineligibility, will no doubt find their reward in gun fights and plagues but don’t you want to even want to try to avoid that?

If you don’t, just ignore this and the price to pay will find you very shortly. Don’t let it be said, God did not grant you a choice. Don’t let it be said, God did not give you a warning. Don’t let it be said that you couldn’t have made a difference because you can make a difference. You are very important in this fight.

Please, join me and help us save the United States of America. Stop letting people muddle your brains out of the reason and facts that are sound here. Devote your time, talent, and money then devote your neighbor’s time, talent and money if they will let you. (smile) Have a wonderful day and may God Bless America and especially those who will help in this fight.

I’m really sorry Gwyneth Paltrow, but if you want to give Obama all the power to accomplish all he’s set out to do, I’m pretty sure that means an elimination of Congress and Judicial Branch Judges’ , but ultimately your articulating for all of us exactly what is in fact happening right now and not at all what might happen. I love you, you’re a beautiful actress whose brain is so fogged up on the character of a man on the outside, and you probably couldn’t recognize the quality of a man’s heart inside and you certainly have never stood in the presence of a great President like George Washington the character of which Obama will never realize.

I pray your fog and muddled speech can be removed in time for your dress not to be impressed and veiled in black as Obama’s Muslim Heritage actually calls for your head or stoning for such damages and I pray your own head slid under the sword is not the moment when you decide the Constitution is worth taking a stand for because you must understand now that if it’s not the Constitution your taking a stand for than its another type of Government your bowing to. Obama as a walking talking violation of the United States Constitution can in no ways represent it truthfully. He is a fraud to the concerns of your liberty and freedom and your ultimate disillusionment to those facts make you look ridiculously stupid.

I don’t want you to look stupid, I want you to wise up and learn the facts that beautify the character of you inside as the gem you are on the outside. I don’t think you even know my name or who I am or what I’ve been doing for the last 7 years but when I LOOK at you, I am reminded that I am indeed fighting for who you are and even though you may not appreciate me now or know my name, if our United States of America is to survive I have no doubt my name will someday cross your lips because I have your back and am on the front line to the liberty of your dress and the freedom of your speech that has paved your red carpet walk.

Without “Freedom of Speech” and “Freedom of the Press”, Hollywood Actresses would be the nothing more than the beggars in the cardboard shelter slums seen in places like Jakarta, Indonesia; a home to one of Obama’s citizenships outlawing his eligibility in the Office of the President and fortifying his unconstitutional occupation of the White House as a usurper.

If you want to give up everything you have and go there and donate all your possessions and wealth, than I will believe you don’t have a secret love that honors the United States Constitution and I have got your all wrong. You need to understand that if you don’t have the protections of the U.S.C., your wealth is gone. It only takes being put in prison one time for you to scream I am an American! What does that mean without the U.S.C.? Nothing!

So why are you losing your ability to speak plainly and clearly about a walking talking violation in the Office of the President? Why can’t you support the true efforts fighting for what your heart truly loves? I want a contribution from you. I really do.

If you agree with us and would like to make a contribution you can do so here.
and THANK YOU!
Sincerely
Cody Robert Judy


You have seen the lightening in the sky in violations, now read the thunder that Taking A Stand is. Get it as a Nook Book now for only $8.49, or as a Hard Back Cover for 28.95 and or Soft Cover for $22.75.

Taking A Stand 2 Minute Promo Spot



Those wishing to read the U.S. Federal Civil Rights Complaint may now do so here now as it is public information: Judy v. Obama 2014 U.S. FED Case No. 1:14cv00093



Wow!Just found my book, Taking A Stand, on sale at your local B&N for nook users if you prefer over soft or hard bound - only $8.49 That's a Great price

Cody Robert Judy
For U.S. President 2016

If you think “Truth” is worth it, support it and quit supporting the lie. That is the beginning of change, or we can just keep on going down this road and see where it leads with Obama. Which is it going to be?

TRUTH IS REAL

The Commercial is simply called "America"


This placed me back at the beginning of the rollercoaster ride with an upset stomach and my choices were ‘quit’ or request the Court to serve the Defendant’s if, and as was the case, they didn’t like the way that I did.
COURT UPDATE

1- Affidavit for Certificate of Default

2- Response to Notice denying Certificate of Default

3- Request for Service of 9 Summons and Complaints upon Defendants by U.S. Marshal or other Court Agent including Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Debbie Wasserman Schultz,Mitch Stewart Jeremy Bird, Jim Dabaki, Matt Lyon involved in DNC and OFA.

Join the new CODY ROBERT JUDY FOR PRES 2016 FB SITE Here


As a matter of House Keeping I am pleased to celebrate with you another mile stone marker of 160,600 views here at www.codyjudy.blogspot.com . Without you this wouldn't be possible, so A BIG AND WARM thank you to all who read and pass it on.

Hero to Zero -Cruz 90% sure he wants to subvert the United States Constitution his Advisors 100%

Hero to Zero - Cruz 90% sure he wants to subvert the United States Constitution his Advisors 100%

http://www.americasfreedomfighters.com/2014/09/29/advisors-confirm-ted-cruz-will-run-for-president/

Its not just the fact that someone who is not a 'natural born Citizen' as is the requirement for the Office of the President, its the stating under oath that you are qualified and collecting dollars in a campaign from people who think you are qualified that makes those who run frauds, bullies, and domestic enemies of the United States by the standard of the United States Constitution.

Its really heartbreaking to see a hero become a zero in one fell swoop and an honorable oath becomes a lie, but that's exactly what U.S. Senator Ted Cruz faces in his decision to officially enter the race for U.S. President in 2016. Of course his greatest defender for doing such as a un-qualified ineligible candidate is Barack Hussein Obama. This of course completely turns every word U.S. Senator Ted Cruz has said about the usurper around and places him on the same side of the isle as those who support Obama in the Office of the President.

Of course Sen. Ted Cruz is a U.S. Citizen, but a dual Citizen which Ted Cruz is quite naturally, cannot be President.

"Tens of millions of Americans would be willing to vote for Ted Cruz; to strike him from the ballot on a technicality in an ambiguous case would be momentously undemocratic", but we don't live in a pure democracy. We live in a Republic with a standard that the U.S. Constitution actually stands as a standard for.

The argument from this article states that if the qualification for President is so archaic than why doesn't Congress change it? Well, McCain thought the same way and sought for a change. He managed a non-binding U.S. Senate Resolution because he, like Cruz, was not born in the U.S. . McCain retained a birth right citizenship from Panama and Cruz has inherited one from Canada where he was born.

There are some four U.S. Supreme Court cases that include in the equation, including McCain's Res 511, that parents are a factor in deciding along with birth place a 'natural born Citizen'. Like the age qualification or 'discrimination' as those who want to abolish the qualifications for the U.S. Presidency would have us believe, the qualification for President is different than the qualifications for U.S. Representatives or U.S. Senators.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ITCr420K4i8



When people ask "why" I'm astonished at the absence of common sense or deductive reasoning. Is not the "President" duties, responsibilities, and job requirement more than "U.S. Representatives" and "U.S. Senators"? Oh yes, the President commands the whole military and U.S. Reps and Sen. simply fund it. Yes, that is a big .. huge.. monumentally large difference.

'House Republicans are itching to pass a variation of the DREAM Act that would grant citizenship to illegals who were brought here at a young age by their parents on the theory that the place where you’re raised is more likely to shape your patriotic loyalty than the happenstance of your birth. If those kids are trustworthy enough to help decide at the polls who the president should be, why shouldn’t they be eligible for the presidency themselves?'

Of course the United States does allow Citizens like McCain, Cruz, Rubio, Jindal, Santorum, and Obama great opportunities to take a part in deciding the shape of our Country in the qualifications of the Offices they have held legally. Of course one of the great characteristics of a 'bully' is once he gets his foot in the door he just keeps on pushing and if you don't push back according to the standard of the Constitution as it stands as the law now, they just keep pushing.

Its not as if the qualification demands haven't been challenged and continue to exist as they are. McCain and company tried before in 2000 when the House Judiciary Committee heard arguments both pro and con, and decided to stop it and leave it alone. I sued McCain in 2008 as a presidential candidate as a violator and an unqualified candidate because he failed the 'natural born Citizen' clause for the President even though he was a qualified U.S. Senator as a Citizen.

Denying the differences of qualifications of "Citizen" and "natural born Citizen" really opens the door for any foreign president to also come over, become a U.S. Citizen, and take over our military crumbling us from within rather than attacking us from without. The Constitution serves as a very good burglar alarm with its qualifications and right now the Constitution actually testifies that in the order of a 'Citizen' to become President, one had to be such a Citizen at the time of the adoption of the Constitution.

Since everyone has died who was a Citizen of the Country at the time of the adoption of the Constitution and McCain and Cruz were not born yet, the law applies only those who are 'natural born Citizens' born in the U.S. to Citizen parents qualify. If one understands the checks and balances of our Government one perfectly understands the vital national security concern of the qualifications that are much higher in all three qualification considerations already established for the Office of the President.

Those who seek to change the U.S. Constitution have the ability to do so by proposing legislation for the U.S. House and the U.S. Senate to approve and than it is signed by a qualified President. Short of this process of altering the U.S. Constitution, those conspiring to bully over it are nothing but bullies.

One very important consideration I believe we all must ask anyone who runs and is not a 'natural born Citizen', (born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents), is why don't they if they are elected to a office in the House or Senate, propose honestly a change? Minus the obvious standard of changing the Constitution, doesn't their actions of not proposing such legislation actually show for you their own un-American character?

Where is the 'honest legislation' from U.S. Sen Ted Cruz to come in the front door of the Office of the President by changing the standard or qualifications of the Office of the President in the U.S. Constitution? If he is unwilling in broad daylight to propose such an 'amendment' doesn't it say to all Americans he is the kind of man who is more than willing to do the opposite to America than the duties of preserving, protecting, and defending the Constitution that the Office of the President demands?

Where is U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz's 'faith' in the United States of America if he is not about following the law? If its not about preserving, protecting, and defending the U.S.C. its just about EGO.


If you agree with us and would like to make a contribution you can do so here.
and THANK YOU!
Sincerely
Cody Robert Judy


You have seen the lightening in the sky in violations, now read the thunder that Taking A Stand is. Get it as a Nook Book now for only $8.49, or as a Hard Back Cover for 28.95 and or Soft Cover for $22.75.

Taking A Stand 2 Minute Promo Spot



Those wishing to read the U.S. Federal Civil Rights Complaint may now do so here now as it is public information: Judy v. Obama 2014 U.S. FED Case No. 1:14cv00093



Wow!Just found my book, Taking A Stand, on sale at your local B&N for nook users if you prefer over soft or hard bound - only $8.49 That's a Great price

Cody Robert Judy
For U.S. President 2016

If you think “Truth” is worth it, support it and quit supporting the lie. That is the beginning of change, or we can just keep on going down this road and see where it leads with Obama. Which is it going to be?

TRUTH IS REAL

The Commercial is simply called "America"


This placed me back at the beginning of the rollercoaster ride with an upset stomach and my choices were ‘quit’ or request the Court to serve the Defendant’s if, and as was the case, they didn’t like the way that I did.
COURT UPDATE

1- Affidavit for Certificate of Default

2- Response to Notice denying Certificate of Default

3- Request for Service of 9 Summons and Complaints upon Defendants by U.S. Marshal or other Court Agent including Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Debbie Wasserman Schultz,Mitch Stewart Jeremy Bird, Jim Dabaki, Matt Lyon involved in DNC and OFA.

Join the new CODY ROBERT JUDY FOR PRES 2016 FB SITE Here


As a matter of House Keeping I am pleased to celebrate with you another mile stone marker of 160,600 views here at www.codyjudy.blogspot.com . Without you this wouldn't be possible, so A BIG AND WARM thank you to all who read and pass it on.