Color,Race, and Prior Servitude Amend.XV and The Parable of The Unfaithful Wife

Race,Color, and Prior Servitude U.S.C Amendment XV
Parable of the Unfaithful Wife

The mysteries of the Lord are sought out by churches and the people that attend them in literally every nation of the world. God is always revealing hidden truths, yet is at the same time the same yesterday, today, and forever. The bible is full of parables and dreams and visions as applicable today as they were the day they were given, yet the Lord still teaches in parables in everyone’s own day that they too can understand and have the experience of finding the hidden truths. Parables give us the experience of finding ourselves… treasures that are of great worth. The Lord says when you come to a child to speak in the language of the child, and so it is I would like to rehearse a modern day parable.

There was a certain women who had become disdained of her husband. She was no longer enchanted by his money, charm, or good looks. She no longer found him attractive and looked to find fault in him daily. She was a goodly women adorned with nice clothes, a clean women who kept herself moderately. She had come from a divorce and had a nice house and children who were nearly raised and it seemed she was coming to the same conclusion of this new husband as she had about the first husband.

Let’s just put a name on this second husband, so we can all simply refer to him with a name. Let’s call him… Abraham. That is a name that comes from the Bible and is pretty respected by every Christian Church. Now the Lord had told this Abraham, just the same as he had told Abraham of old that he would be a man of whom a great nation came, and also that his family would be one even as Abraham’s of old.
Abraham was a faithful man and had been very true to the Lord and had sought diligently to remain in that favor for the Lord had indeed graced him abundantly with many heavenly gifts which were a delight to him, thus he sought to please the Lord and to remain a faithful servant of his Lords’. In this Abraham’s first marriage finances had come to bare down on his young family and his wife had lost faith in him encouraged by her family who wished her back in their own lands and so she went. It pleased the Lord to bruise Abraham that he might learn wisdom and understanding and become even a man of his own heart.

Now, as I said Abraham had sought the Lord diligently to gain some understanding of why his first wife and family had been taken from him and the Lord taught him many things of which he had failed and thus Abraham learned what he was doing that was wrong as a father and husband according to the Lord’s intelligence that was somewhat different then the ‘norms’ of the society he was from. Thus Abraham was encouraged finding some meaning to his heart break in the loss of his family.
So this Abraham in my parable was encouraged, and again went out to get him a wife. This time, faithfully, he understood more of the Lord’s intelligence, and he knew that he could no longer rely on the ‘social norms’ which he had grown up with finding only heartache and loss in those customs. Our Abraham in this parable did meet a woman who he felt was a good woman and he sought diligently to court her and in every way to impress her as a suitor, and she was impressed. They became what we’d call in our modern day world ‘serious’ in their relationship.

Of course Abraham had now a difficult challenge. He had to convey to his fiancé all the Lord had taught him, for it was incumbent upon him to encourage his faithfulness to the Lord, and also his soon-to-be wife. Yet it was ever present on his mind, what had happened to his first wife, and he certainly did not want to make the same mistakes, so it was with a great deal of trembling courage that Abraham related to his finance’ all the Lord had taught him, knowing full well that these revelations could indeed also spoil his new found love that he had worked hard to impress and court.
You can imagine Abraham’s happiness when after all was revealed that this new wife accepted his proposal in marriage. Abraham took a deep breath seeing all had gone ok and his faith in the Lord was not jeopardized and the Lord had blessed him in his new romance. Abraham was, to barrow a modern phrase “tickled to death”, overjoyed, and he sought diligently to make well with his new family. Soon they were married and both of them trudged through some difficult times as the Lord sought to test this marriage.

They had wanted a child together and had sought to achieve that, though they had both had children in their earlier marriages who were near grown and out of the house but nothing happened for two years. Abraham was told in a dream that if his wife would do this and that she would become pregnant, but the this and that involved the trial of their love which the Lord had taught Abraham of which he had conveyed to wife before being married, but had never done.

Of course Abraham knew that it was not enough to worship the Lord in lip service saying, “yes yes Lord” on one hand, perhaps even on a Sunday, and then running out and saying ‘no no Lord” on the other hand, perhaps, even the six other days of the week.

So it was with great trembling again, Abraham related this to his wife who was to Abraham’s sadness not so willing to accommodate what the Lord had related. Nevertheless, Abraham was gentle with her knowing the Lord in his love had been gentle with him at times, and as their talks went on finally they were accomplished in the test the Lord had presented though it wasn’t without a few dents and bruises. This of course was familiar to Abraham, being bruised by the Lord before, but had not really been known to her so it was difficult.

She ordered a separation and thus it had been nearly 3 months since she had seen Abraham, when on occasion she accepted an invitation to go on a trip with him. Abraham grieved in his missing her and doting on his love for her, again sought to court and spoil her in any way he could manage. Though he wasn’t rich he had managed a plane ride, a wonderful dinner, and a room at a luxurious hotel. There she was receptive to him and their love was renewed. Although Abraham was delighted about their love, he sensed something was different about her but he couldn’t figure it out.

Over an ice-cream cone as the trip was nearing an end the next day, she pulled out of her purse and ultrasound picture and related she was 3 months pregnant. Yes, the Lord had indeed blessed them as they were faithful in their own, shall we call it a "test of Abraham".

Time went on and the baby was born which was a delight to both of them, but the baby had not healed her feelings all the way through and though she had seen the blessings, she sought about daily to prove her husband wrong in all of the things he loved. It was as if some competition had invigorated her and through this daily barrage of insults she did not relate to him so directly as she did her friends and her family, gradually another separation occurred.

This was a great sadness to him for he had felt for sure that the blessing and fulfilling of the Lord’s words would also seal her testimony, but it did not. Her heart was different and she was set hard and no amount of courting or attempts by him to restore his marriage worked. The child grew and was a beautiful child whom they both delighted in greatly, he had taken his first steps and they were still separated.

Abraham was weighed down in his grief, for he had sought diligently to please the Lord, but again it pleased the Lord to bruise him. She had taken off her wedding ring which had embarrassed Abraham and she was flippant in her ability without him feeling she had no need for him. She was satisfied and had no desire for him. Abraham weighed down in his grief returned his wedding ring to her jewelry box next to the one he had given her that she no longer felt any value for. He told her perhaps they should put the rings in a trust account for their baby.

One day as Abraham was weighed down in grief and standing in a line with his head bowed a girl he had known, only as an acquaintance, turned as she was in front of him in the line he was waiting in, and felt for his sorrow. She put her arms around his neck and said “Abraham, don’t be sad!”, and he acknowledged her good will towards him as a friend who simply didn’t want to see a friend sad. It was just a pure coincidence that his wife had seen this exchange and after the girl who had put her arms around Abraham and told him not to be sad left bounding off, as to Abraham probably not to be seen coincidentally again, the wife headed off towards the girl and cornered her.

She asked the girl whom she didn’t know at all, seeing her arms around her husband, “Have you ever made-love to my husband?” The girl responded, “Hundreds of times!”, and bounded off again as if not to blink an eye. She then came to her husband and said, “Haah, caught you cheating!”

Now this is the end of the parable.

There are always questions at the end of every parable to be answered. This is the process of a parable. For every church to ask and for every person to ask themselves if in this parable Abraham was actually Jesus and the women in the parable was the Church to whom is married to Jesus in similiar parables of the Bible; in what manner of cheating have you accused the Lord after his faithfulness to you?

Do you not suppose the Lord to visit other churches at all?

Hasn’t he still favored you with many blessings, yet you accuse him of cheating with others who have not truly known him either?

Why have you entreated your husband to accusations of unfaithfulness when he has so patiently and lovingly taught you faithfully all that is known to inherit his kingdom? Are you so bent on hurting him that you would cast him in to prison if he arrived?

And, what must you do now, or what will you do now you have seen as you are seen, taking your ring off? Will you choose to keep it off and find another Lord and who might that Lord be; your usurping president Obama?

What do the rings represent?

Is Obama's love of unfaithfulness towards the Constitution what you really want in a President?

Do you not desire faithfulness? You must desire faithfulness, or you certainly wouldn’t accuse anyone of being unfaithful?

What an oddity it is for people to crave faithfulness and truthfulness but vote for a lie. It is if they can’t help but inherit exactly what they are… unfaithful and liars themselves, blind yet they see.

4th of July Tribute- The Star Spangled Banner Story

4th of July Tribute The Star Spangled Banner Story

Cody Robert Judy United States Senate 2010 UT., presents "4th of July Tribute: Star Spangled Banner Story" ;a short story about Francis Key Scott who penned the Star Spangled Banner as a poem during the British bombardment of Fort McHenry 1812.




Cody Robert Judy
United States Senate 2010 UT.
www.codyjudy.us

Democrat Party faces Utter Extinction or Constitutional Clean Up Trial on Obama

The Democrat Party has only one chance in a million to survive not just a simple crash, bump and run, or fender bender, but realistically putting it gingerly, facing utter extinction from the American Politics.

Their ram rod, shape-shifting, nonfeasance, or failure to act in derogation of a duty to do so, towards the Constitution in a Senate Trial on Obama’s eligibility and into, as Parada put it, “The snake pit he ,‘Obama’, has dug himself, is RUNNNNNNN! Abandon Ship!, leave the corpse to rot, let the dead bury the dead and get the hell out of the snake pit!

If any semblance of dignity, or honor, or respect is going to be left in the Democrat Party, it has got to challenge its own mouth biting its tail, chewing away, and with every passing day pumping life threatening venom into the course of its body as fast as the foreign made oil spill in the gulf is pumping oil into the ocean blue destroying everything in sight.

http://english.pravda.ru/world/americas/113977-1/
"Does Obama have any chances to be reelected? If not, who can become his successor? Pavel Zolotarev, deputy director of the Institute for the USA and Canada, said in an interview with Pravda.Ru that Obama and Democrats on the whole find themselves in a difficult situation at present moment.

“I believe that the administration of the Democratic Party will nominate another candidacy for its own rescue. The political system of the United States is very conservative, which gives the nation a very good protection in critical situations. This is the main reason why the Americans do not want to see Obama in the White House anymore.

Excuse me? How about he isn’t qualified, never was qualified, isn’t about to be qualified in this life time, and is simply an occupier of the White House as a Fraud of any honor towards the United States Constitution and its qualifications of an honorable American President and natural born citizen, and the Democrat Party is the slime of oil in the gulf right now making us all sick with any kind of loyalty to this bastard occupying usurper.

Get it straight we got more pride in America then not to clean our own White House up if the Democrat United States Senators don’t clean it up first. You can put money on that promise.




Cody Robert Judy

The Constitutional Train 911... is so urgent.. emergency

The Constitutional Train 911
Emergency it's so urgent.. Emergency…

CrashhhhhBAMmm! She didn’t know what had hit her, or that she’d even been hit. All she knew was the driver was dead, she was bleeding internally pretty bad as her white shirt began staining with blood near her abdomen and some man was helping her to the hospital quicker than the ambulance could arrive. Her name was America and she had just suffered the worst sedition she could recall in the annals’ of history.

In the broadest sense a fraud is any crime (or civil wrong) for gain that utilizes some deception practiced on the victim as its principal method. For purposes of connecting the dots I just thought I’d see how many things in common I could find between Barack Hussein Obama and Osama bin Ladin, their names have been the subjected to a host of mix ups, Freudian slips, and mis-appropriations.
A Freudian slip if often known as a "slip of the tongue" in which a mistake in speech reveals something of the nature of the speaker's unconscious or semi-conscious desires.

Read more: How to Recognize a Freudian Slip | eHow.com http://www.ehow.com/how_2178668_recognize-freudian-slip.html#ixzz0rXGiLomHHere is a clip of those:



When you make a slip of the tongue or an error of gross misinterpretation (such as with the personals ad example), ask yourself if there might be something deeper to it, or if it's just a silly mistake that's trivial. In fact, ask a friend about your own slips, since after all, we're dealing here with topics that we may not want to acknowledge to ourselves!

Now here are a few minor details that are interesting regarding the similarities of Obama and Osama that are not just slips of the tongue.

1) Both were reportedly born within a 4 year time frame Osama 57, Obama 61 but no long form birth certificate exist.

2) Both their parents divorced soon after they were born

3) Both their mothers soon remarried

4) Both were surrounded by 1 half sister and 2 or 3 half brothers depending on your news source.

5) Both were raised as devout Muslims… but both seem to have major conflicts with some tenants of the religion and I’m not sure they would be considered “Good Examples” of that faith?

a. Obama for example doesn’t have multiple wifes, but he does have multiple sides ie., is a known bi-sexual man having had 2 known lovers come forward Larry Sinclair. Sinclair claims that Young had a similar relationship to BHO and that Young had likely communicated his "jealous displeasure" about BHO's fling with Sinclair and paid for it with his life. Sinclair also charges that Obama gave Young his phone numbers to inquire if Sinclair revealed these secrets to anyone else.

i. Donald Young was the openly gay music director of TUCC who was found murdered in his home with a bullet to the back of his head on Dec. 23, 2007. Two other openly gay TUCC men died under suspicious circumstances in the same time period.
ii. And it goes without saying that Obama is the one who has vowed to hunt down his Muslim brother Osama and has engaged in the increase of over 30,000 more troops in Afghanistan, something Osama should clearly see is a Muslim killing Muslims.

iii.
b. Osama seems to think America has been anti-Muslim and has been on a crusade in spite of the 2500 Mosques in America, the training he himself received from America, and the little known recipe that Afghanistan would have been trounced upon by the Soviet Union if it weren’t for the very generous American people who financed covertly the stingers that turned the tide very well depicted in the movie Charlie Wilson’s War starring Tom Hanks.

i. It would seem to me that if ‘reciprocity’ were a key tenant of Muslims as Osama seems to indicate that Muslims ought to be very happy about America’s help in that war, which we certainly were never paid for.




6) Both had fair complexions with the purple hue lips common in Philippines, Malaysia, Indonesia and some Arab Countries

7) Both mens past get very hazy when they were recruited by the CIA for the same fight.. ironically in or around 1979-1981 in the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan.
a. Osama was recruited by Abdulla Azzam- a Palestine born professor and founder of Hamas, the Palestine militant group after the 1979 Soviet invasion of Afghanistan Assam solicited bin Laden’s to raise money and recruit Arabs to help Muslims repel the Soviets and he played an instrumental role in early development of al Qaeda.

b. Obama in 1979 attended Occidental College where he was recruited by the CIA to assist in the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. He was a natural at Swahili dialect and was seen as a shoe in with an Indonesian passport having been born in Kenya, raised Muslim.

8) Both have pictures they have represented of themselves at different stages of their life that have had the photo shop guy very busy providing a misleading images to the public and ya can’t help but wonder why, here’s just a few of many famous examples?

a. In this photo Obama is seen with his maternal grandparents supposedly in NY after a graduation from Columbia. Notice Obama’s wedding ring on near 10 years before he married Michelle.



i. The most glaring anomaly is the fact that his grandfather appears to be suffering from a severe anatomical distortion: he has 3 arms! Look closely at his left shoulder. His arm is obviously hidden but is clearly hanging at his side. Simultaneously, Stanley Dunham puts his 'third hand' over Barack's shoulder (without raising his arm), but it doesn't quite rest on the shoulder -- it floats in the air!

ii. A closer examination reveals that even the park bench is fraudulent. The photo appears to have been compiled in layers and in the following order: the bench, Stanley Dunham, Barack Obama, Madelyn Dunham, Stanley Dunham's suit jacket—entire left side, and Madelyn Dunham's suit jacket — entire right side.

9) Osama’s Photo Shop pict. Look at his shoulders over bundled and his hands cut off inside the coat.



10) Again with Obama this one representing a family picture: Enlargement (zooming in) of the above photo again reveals some peculiar anomalies which demonstrate a continuing pattern of obfuscation and fraud. How is it that one is unable to identify certain members of one's own family? The answer to that question is found, first, in considering this photo is an entire composite hoax and never actually occurred at all in realtime.



a. Barack Obama, Jr. and all other subjects have been compiled into this photo to give the fraudulent representation of a family gathering. Obama's hands appear to be resting on the shoulders of his half-sister, Auma and his grandmother, Kezia. One can see his cupped hands do not look natural—especially his right thumb—and are merely superimposed to look like they are really there. The hand of Abongo (Roy) Obama, his so-called step-brother, rests on Barack's shoulder, while the same hand is holding the hand of an unknown woman. Enlargement reveals that Abongo's right hand has been altered (masked) by photographic editing, showing a large, square pixel in place of the hand.

i. Again the unknown individual (back row, 2nd from the right) is wearing dark clothes intended to obfuscate the compiled abnormalities which cannot be hidden by other means. The unknown individual (back row, far right) next to him is sporting two-toned trousers, the left leg being powder blue, and the right leg being dark purple. Even the trousers’ inseam on the left leg is purple and is inconsistent with the lack of natural shadows within the entire picture. Nevertheless, that individual's right shoe remains white, while the color of his right pant leg has turned purple.
There’s a lot more of these found here:

http://www.whale.to/b/nicoloff6.html and here if you’d like http://www.directlightproductions.com/
11) Osama seems to have only had 2 reported interviews from 1980 to 2001, both of which are a little sketchy. One in 1996 and 1 in1998. Although some famous tapes are played worldwide, we see constantly that he made a lot of money betting on ‘shorts’ to his known disasters, and then also building and getting contracts from the USA, which were huge! Seems kind of weird to have been trained by the CIA, have billions of dollars to spend, and give some pretty hefty political advice to Americans about whom they should be voting for in the coming elections, almost like he is running?

a. Interesting note that Osama claims America is anti-Muslim with over 2500 Mosques in America and Fox News now owned by Arabs.

12) Now of course, Obama was an awesome political funds raiser, in fact we could call him the billion dollar boy after the campaign of 2008 from such humble beginnings with the CIA and now as President is bombing Afghanistan vowing to capture or kill his Muslim brother Osama who is hiding in the caves that have been renovated with billions of dollars and presumably having lost billions somewhere? Umm I wonder where it went? I’d like to see those caves.


http://whatreallyhappened.wikia.com/wiki/Osama_bin_Laden
“Osama bin Laden was trained by the CIA, as an asset to use against the Soviets. His ties to the CIA were never severed” One consistent claim in the WRH, (‘What Really Happened’), site is that Osama bin Laden has been dead for a long time, and that none of the evidence which might suggest otherwise is credible. He is "a dead nemesis perpetuated by the US government". The main article on that subject gives various items of evidence, and the opinion of several people who might be expected to know, or to have a good idea about this. It also puts a date on his death by citing an obituary, in an Egyptian newspaper, which was published on December 26 2001 and which referred to his death and funeral ten days earlier.

It would follow, from bin Laden's death in 2001, that most, if not all of the tapes purportedly issued by him are fakes. Some could have been recorded before his death and spliced together, in the "fake bin Laden audio tape" article, Swiss researchers are quoted as saying in 2002 there was only a 5% risk of error in their conclusion that the latest tape was a fake. Also, when the Fake 2001 bin Laden Video Tape, a videotape purportedly showing Osama bin Laden confessing to the 9/11 attacks, is subjected to an examination of facial feature differences which leaves little doubt about its lack of authenticity.

Read "Gaping Holes in the 'CIA vs. bin Laden' Story," by Jared Israel, and click the links. http://emperors-clothes.com/news/probestop-i.htm

Speaking of Osama:
“U.S. officials turned down the offer of extradition. 'The Washington Post' article that reported this goes into some length quoting U.S. officials attempting to explain exactly why they turned down the offer. The officials are quoted explaining that the Saudis were afraid of a fundamentalist backlash if they jailed and executed bin Laden, that they resented Sudan, that the U.S. resented Sudan, that the U.S. didn't have sufficient evidence to put him on trial. Everything, in fact, except the simplest explanation: that bin Laden was a U.S. asset - either part of the CIA, or someone whom the CIA used. Perhaps the 'Washington Post' writers were hinting at this explanation when they wrote:

"And there were the beginnings of a debate, intensified lately, on whether the United States wanted to indict and try bin Laden or to treat him as a combatant in an underground war." ('The Washington Post,' 3 October 2001)
Emphasis on the word 'treat' as in 'pretend that he was.'

“Moreover, according to the highly reputable 'Jane's Intelligence Review:'
"In February 1995, US authorities named bin Laden and his Saudi brother-in-law, Mohammed Jamal Khalifa, among 172 unindicted co-conspirators with the 11 Muslims charged for the World Trade Center bombing and the associated plot to blow up other New York landmarks." ('Jane's Intelligence Review,' 1 October 1995)”

“So bin Laden had been named as an unindicted co-conspirator a year before Sudan offered to extradite him.”

“It is mind boggling that U.S. government officials would try to justify rejecting Sudan's offer to extradite bin Laden because the Clinton administration was 'lacking a case to indict him in U.S. courts at the time,' ('WP', 3 Oct.)” “Doesn't it sound like bin Laden's real friends were not in Sudan, as President Clinton tried to convince the world when he sent cruise missiles to destroy a Sudanese medicine factory, but in the U.S. State Department?”

“When Almighty God rendered successful a convoy of Muslims, the vanguards of Islam, He allowed them to destroy the United States. I ask God Almighty to elevate their status and grant them Paradise." This latter statement was pre-recorded and released immediately after the U.S. government started bombing Afghanistan, that is, precisely when Mr. Bush needed the emotional impact of just such a statement in order to 'justify' yet another illegal war; (3)”


http://www.findingosamabinladen.com/info/Osama-Bin-Laden/Did-We-Create-Osama-bin-Laden.htmlMany who follow the history of Osama bin Laden will tell you that the USA created the man, who later became its worst enemy. Many decades prior the US helped the Freedom Fighters in Afghanistan stave off the Russian encroachment.

The US Government supplied the Osama bin Laden Freedom Fighters and the 135 stinger missiles, with tactical advisors and CIA exploits was somewhat an interesting game and Russian Domino affect, as well but America support then did produce Russia's Viet Nam so to speak, he was a semi-left over from that era. His father was also an ally, so many years back as a Saudi Construction man of the Bin Laden Group.

Yes, you could say there were some errors made and some animosity left over there. Indeed hindsight of supporting guerrillas and over throwing dictators and replacing them (such as Afghanistan) around the globe in a Machiavellian world is not easy. America thought they had done the best that they thought they could, however it is very easy to re-write history and call everything a mistake.

One mistake was allowing OBL to turn into a national hero, as Uncle Sam tried to send in Tomahawk missiles to get him and failed and made him even more popular with his radical Islamic followers and added to his stature and made him a symbol, bigger than life. History is interesting and Americas support of Osama previously was also. But that was then and this is now. So, consider all this in your thoughts on the so called "War on Terror".

http://www.findingosamabinladen.com/info/Osama-Bin-Laden/Why-We-Have-Not-Caught-Osama-bin-Laden-Yet.html

{“Isn't it ironic that the Emergency Services number to call in the US is 911. The same as the date of the New York incident ?
Its is also alledged that two months before September 11, Osama bin Laden flew to Dubai for 10 days for treatment at the American hospital, where he was visited by the local CIA agent, according to the French newspaper Le Figaro.
The disclosures are known to come from French intelligence which is keen to reveal the ambiguous role of the CIA, and to restrain Washington from extending the war to Iraq and elsewhere.
Bin Laden is reported to have arrived in Dubai on July 4 from Quetta in Pakistan with his own personal doctor, nurse and four bodyguards, to be treated in the urology department. While there he was visited by several members of his family and Saudi personalities, and the CIA.”}

http://terrorism.about.com/gi/o.htm?zi=1/XJ&zTi=1&sdn=terrorism&cdn=newsissues&tm=1498&gps=341_326_1276_484&f=00&tt=11&bt=1&bts=1&zu=http%3A//www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/binladen/who/interview.html

Quotes from Osama bin Laden in interview:

“The leaders in America and in other countries as well have fallen victim to Jewish Zionist blackmail” “The truth is that the whole Muslim world is the victim of international terrorism, engineered by America at the United Nations.”
“The Western regimes and the government of the United States of America bear the blame for what might happen. If their people do not wish to be harmed inside their very own countries, they should seek to elect governments that are truly representative of them and that can protect their interests. ...”

“If the people have elected those governments in the latest elections, it is because they have fallen prey to the Western media which portray things contrary to what they really are.”

“Do you expect anything but treatment by reciprocity?"

“We have communicated their fatwahs and stirred the nation to drive out the enemy who has occupied our land and usurped our country and suppressed our people and to rid the land of the two Holy Mosques from their presence.”

“We are certain - with the grace of Allah - that we shall prevail over the Jews and over those fighting with them. Today however, our battle against the Americans is far greater than our battle was against the Russians. Americans have committed unprecedented stupidity. They have attacked Islam and its most significant sacrosanct symbols ... . We anticipate a black future for America. Instead of remaining United States, it shall end up separated states and shall have to carry the bodies of its sons back to America”.

“Our religion forbids us from killing innocent people such as women and children. This, however, does not apply to women fighters. A woman who puts herself in the same trench with men, gets what they get. ...”

“The American government is leading the country towards hell. ... We say to the Americans as people and to American mothers, if they cherish their lives and if they cherish their sons, they must elect an American patriotic government that caters to their interests not the interests of the Jews. If the present injustice continues with the wave of national consciousness, it will inevitably move the battle to American soil, just as Ramzi Yousef and others have done. This is my message to the American people. I urge them to find a serious administration that acts in their interest and does not attack people and violate their honor and pilfer their wealth. ...”

“Let not the West be taken in by those who say that Muslims choose nothing but slaughtering. Their brothers in East Europe, in Turkey and in Albania have been guided by Allah to submit to Islam and to experience the bliss of Islam. Unlike those, the European and the American people and some of the Arabs are under the influence of Jewish media. ...”

Video You tube- Obama is Osama parody


That was pretty wild video, though I see some differences, the coincidences are apparent also. The important part of this all is to realize that Obama is a fraud, because he is not a natural born citizen, having a Kenyan father he does not meet the Constitutional standards for being a natural born citizen, and their vote was given under conditions other then what were present. This represented a disdainful disrespect for America and We The People, reprehensible as criminal conduct

As for America she has led the way in tolerence for all religons to practice their tenents and represents a mix of most every religion on the planet. However make no mistake, America was founded as a Christian nation allowing others the same privelege not excluding themselves so others can feel comfortable.

Our Constitution says it was signed "in the year of our Lord"..,and makes reference to it being that many years 1787 since that Lord, known to our founding fathers as Jesus Christ, was born. The Declarations of Independence declares boldly that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness Let no man who is a usurping President say this nation is not a Christian Nation, lest he be called the fool who is a fraud.

Cody Robert Judy

Members of Congress involved in Corruption & Fraud..Resign

Excellent article..Great Work! At least we know a few retired Gen.'s still have balls!

http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/06/16/maj-gen-paul-e-vallely-we-need-to-demand-resignations-of-obama-his-cabinet-and-members-of-congress/

Some precious excerpts:

MRS. RONDEAU: Do you think that we’ve reached that point in America?

GEN. VALLELY: We’re reaching that point, absolutely; we’re almost to the point of no return here. There has been so much destruction to the country already that we cannot wait around until the election of 2012, in my opinion. The other important point that I mentioned was impeachment, which is another peaceful transfer of power. In my opinion, this situation involves the creation of that demand-resignation option which will then force an impeachment. Of course, officials can die in office from a heart attack or health problems; that’s another way power can be transferred. But when you look at where we are now, which I consider to be a gray area, we’re actually holding to the process that leads to anarchy or revolution. We are already, in some ways, involved in some kind of a revolution or revolt by the people now when you look at our financial situation, the health care plan, and Obama’s inability to be an executive who can deal with crises. He’s basically a community organizer who has no experience in the executive world. My opinion is that he is very naive, very immature.

So for all of these reasons, for the first time in our history, we need to demand a resignation not only of him but of his entire cabinet and political appointments. At the same time, there has to be a resignation of those members of Congress who have been involved in the corruption and fraud of the administration and violating the Constitution.

Amicus Curiae in Defence of Lt.Col. Lakin

Cody Robert Judy
No. West
UT. 84
(801)497-
_____________________________________________________________________________
IN THE HONORABLE MILITARY COURT


U.S. ARMY (Plaintiff)
v. Amicus Curiae under UCMJ
LAKIN (Defendant)
Cody Robert Judy- Amicus Curiae LTC Driscoll
______________________________________________________________________________
daniel.driscoll@amedd.army.mil
cc: www.personalinjuryattorneylaw.com info@jensenlawyers.com att: Jenson & Associates- c/o Attorney Paul Rolf Jensen

Re: Amicus Curiae on behalf of the defendant Lakin

Amicus Curiae Concern for Defendant in the matter of U.S. Army v. Lakin in the matter wherein Lakin was charged:

"With one specification of a violation of Article 87, Missing Movement and four specifications of a violation of Article 92 (three specifications of Failure to Obey a Lawful Order, and one Specification of Dereliction of Duty)," said Chuck Dasey, spokesman at Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington, where Lakin is assigned.

*Motion to file leave of Amicus Curiae is respectfully submitted if applicable in UCMJ
______________________________________

Reasons why the Amicus Curiae from Cody Robert Judy is applicable to this Court:
______________________________________


• Cody Robert Judy was a candidate in the 2008 elections for President of the United States, who has filed litigation in two Federal Courts regarding the qualifications of Sen. John McCain, and Sen. Barack Hussein Obama who now occupies the White House. Here are the following Internet Link in support:
• http://www.codyjudy.us/crj4ussenatorut_031.htm Judy vs. McCain
• http://www.scribd.com/doc/22288917/Judy-v-Obama Judy vs. Obama

Cody Robert Judy also recently testified in the CIA Columbia Obama Trial as an injured presidential candidate, who by being in the same Presidential race as Obama has standing, and who swore to tell the truth at the trial where a 10 Amendment Court was held, a Jury selected, Defendant’s were served and given the chance to defend themselves, 6 days of trial witnesses and evidence were produced, and the Jury rendered a guilty verdict on 17 accounts ranging from fraud to sedition on Barack Hussein Obama, Michael Sovern, and Columbia University. The closing arguments are here:

• http://atlah.org/atlahworldwide/?p=8342
• http://www.sonorannews.com/archives/2010/100519/ftpgObamaTrial.html (News)
• http://codyjudy.blogspot.com/2010/05/12-cia-columbia-jury-are-chosen-and-13.html
• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dBJihJBePcs 31 sec. video witness Michelle Obama

The Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 32 Investigation, paragraph 1, reads:

(a) No charge or specification may be referred to a general court-martial for trial until a through and impartial investigation of all the matters set forth therein has been made. This investigation shall include inquiry as to the truth of the matter set forth in the charges, consideration of the form of charges, and recommendation as to the disposition which should be made of the case in the interest of justice and discipline.

a. While the Federal Courts have an interest in procuring justice in the matter, the technicalities of those courts and whatever rulings have or have not transpired do not apply to facts and information relevant to this matter. So it is that this court may also consider whatever evidence it seems true and faithful to the U.S.C.

(b) Your statement in paragraph 6 making a unilateral ruling on the role Congress may or may not play in any eligibility determination is incorrect. Obama has been sued prior to his (presumably) legally becoming President since he had never shown himself to be legally eligible to hold that office and in fact lied on his Declaration of Candidacy. Your pretense that somehow Congress could impeach a person ineligible to hold office actually is contrary to what would happen in the matter of an ineligible person who was sitting in the presidential seat of authority as a usurper.

(c) The Frame Work necessary to straighten the executive branch should be recognized by this court as a matter of jurisprudence, and if there exist evidence that would release the charges by statutes of compliance towards duty, that should be considered equitably. If there is one advantage of a military court, it is that of examining evidence and testimony minus the political fever at large. Now I challenge this court to hear my testimony, and to examine the evidence herein as a matter of defense for Lt. Col. Lakin as I do have direct standing in the matter which surrounds the issues with which he is so charged with, and I offer myself as witness for his behalf feeling it would be beyond my ability to withhold my testimony as a natural born citizen of the United States who has standing in the 2008 Presidential Election, in the defense of the same military which is sworn to protect me and uphold the United States Constitution.

(d) The Frame Work of the CIA Columbia Obama Trial held in Harlem, NY May 14-19th 2010, brought a comprehensive and collection of evidence never before packaged in such a way at great cost and sacrifice and should be presented for Senate/House Congressional Trial to Judicial Committee by a coalition of presenters, and to this Military Court. Men of courage such as Maj. Gen Paul E Valley (retired): citing the Constitutional Authority as such:

a. U.S.C. Art. I, Sect 8, Clause 10 the Congress shall have power “to define and punish Offenses against the Law of Nations;” for “Natural Born Citizen” requirement subject to Art.II Sect. 1, Clause 5, in the directive of Clause 6 [In case of the Removal of the President from Office – due to –inability to discharge the Powers and Duties of the said Office] Obama can’t be impeached as he was never qualified to be President.

(e) Today in this article http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=164409 your Honorable Sir, Major General Paul E Valley stated: "We now must call for the immediate resignation of Barry Soetero (AKA President Barack Hussein Obama) … based on incompetence, deceit, fraud, corruption, dishonesty and violation of the U.S. oath of office and the Constitution," he said in remarks delivered to a Lincoln Reagan dinner in Virginia City, Mont., last week and published today on the Stand Up America website. "And a call for a national petition for new elections to select the next president of the United States of America must be initiated," he continued. "We can wait no longer for a traditional change of power and new government."

I, Cody Robert Judy, do affirm that I have submitted this testimony and evidence under no obligation or threat of harm, and do so with my own volition and with the utmost integrity to relate the facts where upon I am so relevant in the matter, and upon necessary means am willing to come to this court and so testify to the courts satisfaction under cross examination and oath.

I further say not.

Cody Robert Judy /s/ affixed this 9th day of June,2010. Wensday 8:16pm

Witness in CIA Columbia Obama Trial- as an injured 2008 Presidential Candidate
http://www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

The Frame Work of Obama's Constitutional Eligibility

The Frame Work Necessary to Straighten the Executive Branch


http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/06/09/the-post-emails-exclusive-interview-with-eligibility-attorney-mario-apuzzo/comment-page-1/#comment-12765
Great Article here that highlights 2 very important things
1) Republican Senators gagged themselves with Sen. Res 511.
2) The Constitutional Eligibility of the U.S. Presidency is not a racial issue it's a Constitutional issue


The Post & Email’s exclusive interview with Eligibility Attorney Mario Apuzzo
“THE FOUNDERS GAVE US A DEFINITION THAT WE COULD ALL AGREE ON”
by Sharon Rondeau

"Attorney Mario Apuzzo, who represents the four plaintiffs in Kerchner v. Obama
(Jun. 9, 2010) — Mario Apuzzo was born on June 30, 1956. He graduated from Jamesburg High School in New Jersey in 1975. He obtained his undergraduate degree in Political Science from Wilkes University in Wilkes-Barre, PA. He then attended Temple University School of Law in Philadelphia, from which he graduated with a Juris Doctorate degree in 1982. He then continued his post-graduate legal studies at the University of the Pacific in Sacramento, CA, at its McGeorge School of Law and in Salzburg, Austria, which also included coursework in Milan, Italy, receiving a Diploma in Advanced International Legal Studies in 1983. He has also studied comparative international law at Temple University, in Rome, and has pursued a second law degree in the European civil law system at the University of Naples.
Mr. Apuzzo founded his law firm in 1983, at which time he went into private practice in New Jersey. He currently has his law offices at 185 Gatzmer Avenue, Jamesburg, New Jersey 08831. He is engaged in the general practice of law which includes trials and appellate work in both the state and federal courts."




"Regarding the Obama eligibility controversy, Attorney Apuzzo published his first blog entry on December 20, 2008 after having followed and contributed to the postings on the websites of Leo Donofrio and Orly Taitz. Commander Charles Kerchner was put in touch with Attorney Apuzzo by an acquaintance who had known he had been seeking an attorney to challenge Congress and Obama regarding Obama’s eligibility to serve as President of the United States."

Cody Judy says:
Wednesday, June 9, 2010 at 2:27 PM

Great Article and report here, it was so refreshing to hear an expert in the field speak of the McCain Gag Order that all the R U.S. Senators tied on themselves, and the Racial issue which is bogus, based in fact by the many law suits McCain also faced.

Mario Appuzzo would be another great mind to present evidence to Congress along with Maj. Gen Paul E Valley

Consider: www.wnd.com/?pageId=164409

The Frame Work necessary to straighten the Executive Branch

The CIA Columbia Trial brought a comprehensive and collection of evidence never before packaged in such a way at great cost and sacrifice and should be presented for Senate/House Congressional Trial to Judicial Committee by a coalition of presenters. Men of courage such as Maj. Gen Paul E Valley: citing the Constitutional Authority as such: U.S.C. Art. I, Sect 8, Clause 10 ..the Congress shall have power “to define and punish Offenses against the Law of Nations;” for Natural Born Citizen requirement subject to Art.II Sect. 1, Clause 5, in the directive of Clause 6 [In case of the Removal of the President from Office – due to –inability to discharge the Powers and Duties of the said Office] Obama can’t be impeached as he was never qualified to be President.

I can’t help think that due to the excessive time placed in the Judicial Branch in the Appeals process on every single legal issue, the right of the Legislative Branch to hold trial and the presentments to the Judicial Committee’s of the House and the Senate might be a much better way to go and I don’t think there is any prohibitive reason that an expert would be prohibited from acting in such a way just because of Judicial Branch engagements, especially in the light of the seriousness of the offense and the destruction taking place to America by the executive branch.

Cody Robert Judy
Witness in CIA Columbia Trial- as an injured 2008 Presidential Candidate

Obama and McCain challenged in law suit here:
http://www.codyjudy.us/crj4ussenatorut_031.htm
http://www.scribd.com/doc/22288917/Judy-v-Obamahttp://www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

www.codyjudy.blogspot.com