Author - Cody Robert Judy
Conservative Independent American
Candidate for Pres 16, 12, 08
U.S. Senate 18, 10, 04, 00
U.S. Rep. 02
Book: Taking A Stand - The conservative independent Voice
Social Media Connections: YouTube: CodyJudy - Watch the latest Commercials Spots and Video Interviews Twitter @codyrobertjudy Instagram: CodyRobertJudy Facebook: CodyRobertJudy
PRESS RELEASE
We are pleased to announce a Declaration of Candidacy for
the United States Senate Office as a Choice for Voters in the State of Utah-
Write-In - Cody Judy. Cody is well- known and a qualified Candidate for Utah. Here is a Link to a short Brief of Cody Judy’s
Political Record and some personal facts you may be surprised to learn.
Providing a Choice for
Utah Voters is the biggest reason I have decided to run as a WRITE-IN Candidate
in the U.S. Senate Race. Utah has some of the greatest scenery on Earth in my
opinion, but some of the deepest darkest most corrupt judges, political arenas,
government leaders, and judgmental swamps in History of the United States. My Candidacy simply offers a Choice Difference-
Freedom and Liberty in Harmony with the Supreme Law of the Land without which
the people perish for want of fresh air, food, and water drowning in swamps of
deception, fraud, fabrication and corrupt cover-up. Utah doesn’t need another
suit Utah needs a Superman-I am Cody Judy and I am that Choice.
Obama reached back to 1906 to employ The Antiquities Act to snatch 1.35 million acres mainly in Utah with a swath in Nevada today.
The Washington Post
Now non-Resident [Obama on Wednesday created new national monuments in a sacred tribal site in southeastern Utah and in a swath of Nevada desert, after years of political fights over the fate of the areas.]
[The designations further cement Obama’s environmental legacy as one of the most consequential — and contentious — in presidential history. He now has invoked his executive power to create national monuments 29 times during his tenure, establishing or expanding protections for more than 553 million acres of federal lands and waters.]
Republican Utah U.S. Representative Jason Chaffetz said he was “outraged” by the designation, saying Obama’s decision “politicizes a long-simmering conflict.”, but did nothing to prevent it having received November 22nd, 2016 the Emergency Impeachment Petition of Constitutionally Ineligible defacto President [*1See the Petitions Sent to Republican Controlled U.S. House and U.S. Senate below]
We wanted to Wish you a Very Happy New Year!
Another Utah Elected Official, Republican U.S. Senator Mike Lee, made a Facebook Response having learned of the Obama Federal King Land-Grab in Utah. Within the first 5,000 views Presidential Candidate Cody Robert Judy, also a resident of Utah, piped up on the hypocrisy shown by Utah's elected Officials who have received now actual forensically expert established evidence Obama is a Fraud, but have not made a move to do anything about it.
Congress was in Session one week in November and one week in December having received this Petition and Appeal at the beginning of the Session in November. They had ample time to read it at the beginning of the Session in November, and they could have taken it home for a month and had a vote on it in December before they adjourned. It's not like they can't have a hearing within a week as the FBI Hearing with James Comey was called in order within a week of his announcement Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton would not be charged officially.
BREAKING NEWS UPDATE
OBAMA 22 Day EXECUTIVE ORDER SMACK DOWN ON RUSSIA Kicks out 35 Russians http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN14I1TY [The move against the diplomats from the Russian embassy in Washington and consulate in San Francisco is part of a series of actions announced on Thursday to punish Russia for a campaign of intimidation of American diplomats in Moscow and interference in the U.S. election. ]
The Elected Officials really cannot hide or cover up what they have known. Utah People need to know that these Officials have basically given Obama a Pass of Constitutional Responsibility in violation of the Laws Established by the People. Those officials failed to uphold the Supreme Law of the Land and now Obama has extended the Federal Government's arm around them like a snake and has squeezed.
In today's world of media I mused today it is very difficult when the Media Frames the narrative of good, bad, and ugly to see the negative about a person sometimes. I was talking today about Hitler with Today's Modern Media framing his agenda. The media has definitely been a part of framing Obama's positive circus and leaving out what kind of a person it takes to put out a fabricated birth certificate for the purposes of obtaining and maintaining the Office of the President as a Usurper. That's just not a very nice person is it? That's a person with deception and fraud as a moral compass. One that has no respect or integrity for the Office of the President or the qualifications enamored within its bounds purchased with the blood of millions of people. I'm reminded of the simplity of our Constitution and the Qualifications principled in this First 2016 Election Commercial of the whole Race. This was the first one made by anyone running and its entitled I AM AMERICAN - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4otwMXGzvac
ObamaConspiracyDefender Kevin 'Doc' poses next to
minion Kevin obamaconspiracy.org
DEMOCRAT ESTABLISHMENT APOCALYPTICALLY WRONG ON BIRTHER ISSUE - CONSPIRACY promoted by Media and Democrats FUELS TRUMP's Electoral College Win in America
Minions of course go apocalyptically crazy if their evil leader is killed AND their search for just the right one is legendary. It's in their genetic make-up to follow the most narristic evil mad crazy leader they can find.
[It is shown in Minions that they have existed since the beginning of life on Earth, and desire above all else to serve the most terrible of villains]
My son and I had fun painting our Pumpkins as evil Minions this year also featured in my Tweet about Anti-Birthers refusing Expert Forensic Evidence.
I thought today about all of the ridicule I receive here about my Cases on defending Art. II., Sect. 1, C-5, of the COTUS and wondered kind of dreamily:
If anti-Birthers ( which include most MSM Pundits) had ANY regrets about not writing or producing any positive stories about Birthers? In particular, those of mine that represented Standing as a Presidential Candidate suffering harm and damages by the violation of my Civil or Political Rights to run a fair race with the COTUS Standard Qualification- American Allegiance by birth place and parents ?
As I mulled this thought around, I mused , would Donald Trump have won IF the U.S. Supreme Court had heard Judy v. Obama 12-5276 filed in 2012, or even 14-9396 filed in 2014?
Think about ALL the Steam taken out of Trump's Train?
He would not have been the Birther Leader because it would have been irrelevant if an actual Presidential Candidate beat him to the U.S. Supreme Court.
I've thought about all the juice, steam, and fuel that The Anti Birther Argument created, being used even in the Presidential Debates and literally hundreds of stories with multiple networks teamed up in tandem on this issue... but no decision called for or propositioned by MSM Sources to SCOTUS.
It all worked for Trump's narrative with the Public. Trump said, All the MSM was corrupt and were Minions for Obama.
Yet.., there the Cases were like jewels set before the U.S. Supreme Court and they ( the Justices) sneered at them which protected Trump's narrative.
I think the COTUS is very important to all Americans and the refusal to HEAR the Cases ( regardless of the decision) would have helped Democrats appear more neutral with the COTUS rather then smugly bias and discriminatory on the forma pauperis finding of 14-9396.
I think you could give argument that SCOTUS's refusal to HEAR gave Trump the fuel to win. , which interfered with the 2016 Election.
GOOGLE DEFINITION of BIRTHER exclusive to Obama
subbing Racist Narative
Out of all the Cases that have gone to the U.S. Supreme Court, only one Petitioner, as a Presidential Candidate with standing suffering damages, filed in 2008, 2012, and 2016, has a Federal Court Record against Republicans and Democrats standing up for Article II, Section 1, Clause 5- Cody Robert Judy. Mr. Judy's Record Refutes the Main Stream Media's assertions that Birthers claims were purely racist against Mr. Obama. The fact that they stubbornly refuse to acknowledge the Legal Cases filed in Federal Court continue to stand as a witness of their own agenda of employing Racism as a claim against the U.S. Constitution
Obama eligibility at the Supreme Court of the United States
1) Anderson v. Obama (Cert* Denied)
2) Barnett, et. al. v. Obama, et. al. (Cert Denied)
3)Barnett v Padilla (Cert Denied)
4) Berg v. Obama, et. al. (Stay Denied & Cert Denied)
5) Beverly v. Federal Elections Commission (Cert Denied)
6) Craig v. United States (Cert Denied)
7) Donofrio v. Wells (Application for Stay Denied)
8) Dummett, et. al. v Padilla (Cert Denied)
9) Fair v. Walker (Cert Denied)
10) Farrar v. Obama & Kemp (App. For Stay & Cert Denied)
11) Herbert v. United States, et. al. (Cert Denied)
12)) Hollister v. Soetoro (Cert Denied)
13) Judy v. Obama, et. al. (Application for IFP status Denied, case closed)
14) Kerchner, et. al. v. Obama, et. al. (Cert Denied)
15) Keyes v. CA. Secretary of State Bowen (Cert Denied)
16) Lightfoot v. CA. Secretary of State Bowen (Stay Denied)
17) Noonan v. CA. Secretary of State Bowen (Stay Denied)
18) Paige v. Vermont (Cert Denied)
19) Purpura v. Sibelius (Cert Denied)
20) Rhodes v. Mac Donald (Injunction & Cert Denied)
21) Schneller v. Cortes (Emergency relief & Cert Denied)
22) ex. rel. Sibley v. Obama (Cert Denied)
23) Sibley v. DC Board of Elections (Cert Denied )
24) In re: Voeltz (Cert. Denied, Petition for a Writ of Mandamus, Denied)
25) Vogt v. Obama/In re: Vogt (Cert Denied)
26) Welden v. Obama (Cert Denied)
27) Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Application for Stay Denied)
*”Cert”= A Petition for a “Writ of Certiorari” which is a request for an appeal to be heard before the Court. It takes four Justices to agree to grant a Cert Petition, known as “The Rule of Four”.
Next the Cold Case Posse make the Case Obama's Birth Certificate is a Fraud.
25,000 + Hits in a week! Obama's Last Press Conference BLOWS UP with Birth Certificate https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BGEMHOEil5c
Here's Trump saying "Barack Obama was Born in the United States Period" September 16, 2016 and covered heavily by the #MSM -
Some have wondered, some have guessed, but a few have known that the cover up on Obama's Ineligibility was in plain sight. So why have Republican Leaders in Congress as well the Courts , champions of so-called "National Security" , not followed Law & Order, set up a system for some that's different for others, and disqualified Obama as a Disability to the Office of President if he's Ineligible for that Office?
The answers may surprise you, but first let's take a detailed look at what [ natural born Citizen ] means and the Qualification of Time it spans as if Congress were the children and knew nothing, because that seems to be the biggest defense these days for Presidential Candidates, "I didn't know" , "it was a matter of convenience" , and of course there is , " I don't want to be labeled a Racist".
First we can primarily and elementarily understand that there is something different about [natural born Citizen] because the Qualification in the U.S. Constitution for the Offices of a U.S. Representative and U.S. Senator is [Citizen].
If Congress is only authorized to Adopt [Citizens] through the [ naturalization ] process, we can rule out any circumstance they have supposed in any naturalization Acts as being [natural born Citizen].
With all types of Citizenship we understand there are only two variables that can vary in ascertaining types of allegiance. The Place can vary and basically announces the Law or Jurisdiction of Law you were born under. Your Parents in the U.S. are both able to vote, so are considered relevant in an inherited citizenship.
Now, if your Mom or Dad cannot Vote in America they have what is called a foreign or alien allegiance to the United States of America. Thus if you're a child of a mixed or divided parental allegiance you inherit that divided allegiance plainly just like you inherited half your genetics from both parents.
The different scenarios or circumstances of Birth have all been considered by Congress in the naturalization acts that make a child a U.S. Citizen, but remember we did not say [ natural born Citizen ].
There is only one definition of [ natural born Citizen ] that is definitely missing from Congressional naturalization Acts and that definition is [Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents]. The reason of course is it was never doubted, by anyone, that a Nation could propagate it's own population. To deny such would be treasonous to the Nation itself and it would be an act-of-subversion or war to declare such population by another Nation.
Excerpt in Red Reads: [I find know fault with the introductory clause, which is simply declaratory of what is written in the Constitution, that every human being born [within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural-born citizen]; but sir, I may be allowed to say further, that I deny that the Congress of the United States ever had the power or color of power to say that [any man born within the jurisdiction of the United States not owing a foreign allegiance, is not and shall not be a citizen of the United States.] Citizenship is his birthright and neither the Congress nor the States can justly or lawfully take it from him. But while this is admitted, can you declare by congressional enactment as to citizens of the United States within the States that there be no discrimination among them of civil rights?]
The accommodations of the three variables then exist between foreign soil, foreign father and foreign mother. You could be born on U.S. soil to foreign parents and the naturalization act known as the 14th Amendment assist your claim of U.S. Citizenship, not [natural born Citizenship].
The verbiage is clear in the 14th Amendment - [All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.]
Did it say [ natural born Citizens] ? No, it says [citizens]. So, why would anyone suppose all Obama had to be was born in the U.S. to be a [natural born Citizen]? If you think about it, the thought of forgetting the word [citizen] in the 14th Amendment and [natural born Citizen] in Art. II. Sect.1,C-5 is "delusional" or in other words a denial of Facts.
It's also delusional to think Congress can adopt [ natural born Citizens]. That would be like two parents saying they wanted to Adopt the child they both were natural mother and father to. The Court's would laugh at such a delusion as an absurdity. They don't have to. They are the mother and father.
So the 14th Amendment makes clear those born in the United States of America are Citizens and respectively in defining the Union of State's, declares, [and of the State wherein they reside ], didn't say territory or accupied piece of foreign soil like Panama for Sen. McCain.
Sen. McCain was not born in a State of the Union. He was in fact [naturalized] by an Act of Congress. It's delusional or a denial of facts to say otherwise.
The Office of President/VP/ was the ONLY office RESERVED and PRESERVED for the Nation of The United States of America. Obama says things have changed and essentially the blurred lines of the Internet cable , shared WiFi air space, and commerce between Nations that the United States of America is not so. Obama is delusional. We have borders, laws against illegal immigration, as do other Nations.
UPDATE: Nov. 26,2016 Fidel Castro has died:
(May he rest in peace. The Leader for the Nation of Cuba for a long time. I like the perching dove on his shoulder story)
[A few days after President Obama’s highly publicized visit to Cuba in 2016 — the first by a sitting American president in 88 years — Mr. Castro penned a cranky response denigrating Mr. Obama’s overtures of peace and insisting that Cuba did not need anything the United States was offering.]
The Office of the President was reserved for America's homegrown allegiance & posterity. Dual , Divided or Fractured allegiance was understood to be needing adopting status and Congress took them up. For example, Title Eight ss 1401 a-h is entitled [ Nationals and Citizens at Birth].
Notice it does not say [ natural born Citizens]. It mimics the 14th Amendment language of [ Born and naturalized in the U.S. ].
The Constitution cannot endure an immoral people. Delusional people deny Facts. People who lie distort the Truth. These are forms of Dishonesty and act as a destructive force upon the Nation.
I'm not sure where we can find a bigger lie upon the Nation than a sacrifice in National Security or that which prohibited any other allegiance in the Office of President other than American.
Now why is this a most vulnerable position? The Office of President is the Head of the Executive Branch co-equal in Powers of the Legislative Branch and the Judicial Branch. Those two Branches are divided up in concentrations of many Body Congress Offices and Panels of Judges, and People moving slow in majorities and actions.
The Office of President was needed for swift decisive circumstances demanding a head not a body taking votes. It was however hamstrung by two term as limits but remained a co-equal Branch. It was further hamstrung or reigned in from abuse by the Qualification of [ natural born Citizen] ie. Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents- Total and complete American Allegiance that takes two generations.
You would also have to be delusional to think that life in the U.S. was exactly like life in Iran, or North Korea, or China, or Russia, or Sweden. The biggest concern in two generations of time for the Office of President was acclimation of our Laws, Customs, and norms which are different than any other Nation. Denial of these facts is Delusional. They are Recorded in The House Judiciary Committee 2000.
The disturbing reality is I believe Congress and the Court's are very capable of absorbing all these Facts, just like elementary school children. That makes their delusion of the Facts a complete violation of Law & Order.
Art.II, Sect.1, C--5 specifically mentions that being a [ natural born Citizen] was not the Qualification for President if you were a [Citizen] at the Time of the Adoption of this Constitution .
It made sense to grandfather in Citizens of a new Nation at the Time it was being forged with its own Sovereignty Land mass called States that formed a new Jurisdiction of Law & Order dedicating powers and authority best to preserve itself.
I feel it a tragedy that these Majority Republicans in the House and Senate now since 2010 and 2012 respectively have failed to bring their impressions to enlighten the Public for the Trust of the Nation, but they have all either hidden or remain delusional to the Fact that Obama is not a [ natural born Citizen ] with his Kenyan father who was never a U.S. Citizen with the power of a Vote.
It's not a shame to American Ideals to say our Law Demands someone born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents as President. It's a Recognition! A Reward! A Positive Incentive regardless of color, race, prior condition of servitude, or sex!
Sure, you may need 60 Senators for a denial of a filibuster , but not for a Hearing in a Committee where you can persuade with Facts even your childish colleagues and advertise to the Nation on C-Span such Facts as Reality differentiating the Delusions. Come on, I'm a Democrat, have been for years.
I don't subscribe to delusion of Facts relating to our Constitution. I sued McCain and Obama. Republican Cowards in the corner, I say, "Come out!" Stand as Americans with some courage as I have for True Principle. If you're embarrassed by our Nation because of being called Racist you sure don't have the courage to lead a Nation in the positions you are in.
You have frankly compromised our Nation's top Office. There is no other word for it. Why? Was it to gain 1,000 seats across the Land Obama has lost for Democrats while you sanctioned the 10 Trillion in the Treasury and sold generations after you their Freedom and Liberty?
Was it because Sen McCain was a good-ole-boy and cronyism is less feared than racism? Who ever had two Congressional Acts on their citizenship and wasn't called the prankster of the [ natural born Citizen] ship?
Was it because you hoped Obama would pave the way for a much deeper bench of Republican Senators Representatives, and Governors who also like Obama are not [ Born in the U.S to Citizen Parents- making them not true [natural born Citizens]?
Well, compromise is good but not if you die first. You gotta stand up and draw a line and defend Americans or you are sacrificing Americans, and those whose hopes and dreams rest in that defense. Sure, Republicans and Democrats have their differences, but in the end we are Americans-some new-some old- not all are Qualified for President, not all for the House or Senate, but we are under the U.S. Constitution and it is the Republic for which we stand.
You know I've fought Democrats as a Democrat. I've fought Republicans too. I don't give a damn about standing for corruption over the red, white, and blue. Our Constitution demands a natural born Citizen in the Office of President, and Obama's failed that test. He's an embarrassment in the Office for our elementary children watching and reading we want them to be the best.
They know you know and your example is thus far sick and delusional. Look at Minor v. Happersett which is SCOTUS precedent and states, " No doubt for those born in the Country to its Citizens were natives or natural born Citizens to the others there have been doubts" , and ask yourself is an Entire Co-Equal Branch of the Government worth giving up the high ground, or is the Office of President an office you are comfortable leaving with doubts?
No doubt your Republican Establishment lost the Presidency to someone who never held office before. President Elect Trump was hammered as the Leader of the Birther Movement and inspired more to come out and vote because they saw an opening to smash the Establishment of Corruption. Your pink slip may come quickly.
You Republicans who are left and continue to fail National Security are not out-of-the-woods yet. In fact, failing to act might be just what Democrats need as you get blamed for the National Security breech in the Office of President.
You may have heard of the out-Landish Australian Refugees Australia won't even take from Theocracies in the Middle East predominate to Islam. The Refugees are Muslims but Obama has a stealth plan to bring them.
The breach of NATIONAL SECURITY is in the hands of these men who have so far refused the Facts of Evidence received by them in the COLD CASE POSSEE of Sheriff Joe Arpiao of a fabricated long form birth certificate, and Selective Service Record.
Cody Robert Judy was the only Presidential Candidate in America to have a bi- Partisan Federal Court Record taking a stand for the [ natural born Citizen] Qualification for U.S. President in three runs for President 2008, 2012, and 2016.
PRES. CANDIDATE SEEKS INDICTMENTS ON THE U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES
BREAKING NEWS: WAR ON THE POOR
RESOLUTION INDICTMENTS SOUGHT BY 2016 U.S. PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE on ALL U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES!!!
2016 U.S. Presidential Candidate Cody Robert Judy is asking both the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate to pass RESOLUTIONS in their respective bodies that would indict all of the U.S. Supreme Court Justices in affect for what he pleads is effectively the worst case scenario on Justice For All - A WAR ON THE POOR.
The following RESOLUTION is being asked to be circulated by every Citizen upon his/her Representative and Senator as the General Public of CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES to every U.S. Senator and U.S. Representative in Congress for the Individual States.
It is the Duty of the Individual Citizens of every Particular State to Forward this to their ELECTED LEADERS as that is Who they were elected to Serve and more often then not the Elected Officials in your State will not take a Resolution Proposition from someone of a different State. Its usually very easy E-Mailed if you Google your State U.S Representative and U.S. Senator.
Please Submit the following RESOLUTION to the HOUSE Judiciary Committee- Constitution and Civil Courts Subcommittee as well as the SENATE Judiciary Committee - Subcommittee- Constitution
IN THE 114TH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION IN THE YEAR OF OUR LORD 2015 U.S. House of Representatives U.S. Senate
CRJ WAR ON THE POOR RESOLUTION
RESOLUTION
Indictment of IMPEACHMENT for Bad Behavior on ALL CURRENT SERVING U.S. Supreme Court Justice(s) for WAR ON THE POOR ACTION prohibiting the Poor from seeking Justice in the U.S. Supreme Court
WHEREAS : It is the U.S. Federal Law that [Justice For All] shall not be Prohibited from any United States Citizen on account of forma pauperis standing or condition of Poverty
WHEREAS: The Petitioner in the Case was not sanctioned OR dismissed by U.S. SUPREME COURT RULES 39.8
WHEREAS: TWO LOWER Court's of Law in the Federal District Court (Utah Division) and Federal Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals have undertaken Proceedings GRANTING Cody Robert Judy (CRJ) a 2008,'12, and 2016 Candidate for the Office of President Forma Pauperis Standing in the Calendar Year JULY 2014-15
WHEREAS: Federal Statute honors a GRANTED Forma Pauperis Standing for a Calendar YEAR
WHEREAS: TWO WITNESSES of the Judicial Branch have on the Federal Court Record GRANTED CRJ access to JUSTICE of their Court(s), but the U.S. Supreme Court has Denied Access to JUSTICE from it's Bench in the same Calendar Year by a single Justice Sotomayor and upon [REVIEW] the FULL or entire U.S. SUPREME COURT BENCH, and has Denied ACCESS to [Justice] in the U.S. Supreme Court solely on the conditions of Poverty PUNITIVELY upon CRJ in CASE 14-9396 on account of his Poverty as the Docket indicates , a WAR ON THE POOR is Noticed and has been Noticeably declared by the U.S. Supreme Court Justices.
WHEREAS: ANY U.S. Citizen is considered Equal under the Supreme Law of the Land in and under the benevolence of The U.S. Constitution formed by the Union of the 50 individual State(s) forming the United States as the Body of We The People, a WAR ON THE POOR of one is considered a WAR ON THE POOR of all.
WHEREAS: U.S.C. ARTICLE III Sect.I provides Judicial Powers vested in the U.S. Supreme Court and in inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish.
WHEREAS: U.S.C ARTICLE III Sect. 1 states: The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during [good Behaviour] and Sect 2 states: Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States to all cases affecting [Citizens] thereof.
WHEREAS: Denial of ACCESS to any Federal Court established under the U.S. Constitution solely on the basis of Poverty can only be contrived as the WORST POSSIBLE CASE of JUSTICE in the United States of America under the banner and [Pledge of Allegiance] in JUSTICE For All constituting BAD BEHAVIOUR
BE IT RESOLVED That this BODY OF LEGISLATURE [U.S. House of Representatives] and [U.S. Senate] in their JUDICIAL COMMITTEES SHALL take the TWO Inferior Courts of Law as Witnesses, as well CRJ as a Third Witness, and SHALL RESOLVE to undertake IMMEDIATE IMPEACHMENT Proceedings against those so named individual Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court constituting the FULL REVIEW for Bad Behaviour upon the U.S. Constitution and Justice for All.
END
AGAIN YOUR HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT: It is the Duty of the Individual Citizens of every Particular State to Forward this to their ELECTED LEADERS as that is Who they were elected to Serve and more often then not the Elected Officials in your State will not take a Resolution Proposition from someone of a different State. Its usually very easily E-Mailed if you Google your State U.S Representative and U.S. Senator. DO IT TODAY!
U.S SENATE JUDICIARY Committee- Subcommittee on Constitution
SENATOR CORNYN - CHAIR
R.M Sen. Durbin
Members: Sen. Tillis Sen. Graham Sen. Whitehouse Sen. Coons Sen. Cruz Sen. Franken Sen. Vitter
OPINION Of course I would not ask anyone to do anything that I wouldn't do, so I include my information here that let my own Utah U.S. Senator Hatch and U.S. Senator Lee as well as my U.S. Representative Rob Bishop 1st Congressional District of Utah know about this injustice that needs to be remedied.
It is very difficult for me to understand why any Senator or U.S. Representative would be against treating the poor equally and who would not see this as a matter of very important consideration. Just a few questions I have received so far in introducing this: Q. Would removing the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court undue their decisions on marriage equality? There might be a reasonable argument for challenging any opinion that has been brought down by a Court whose Justices are impeached' for 'bad behavior ", but I wouldn't count on it. Q. The Court has granted several 'forma pauperis' petitioners, doesn't this fact place your proposed legislation in jeopardy of not holding water? Of course there have been cases this Court has granted Forma Pauperis standing on. The fact is emphasized in not granting mine, when two Courts below did,(as well as the U.S. Supreme Court themselves in 2012, and my Motion for Forma Pauperis standing was not dismissed on any basis of [abusive filings] as the U.S. Supreme Court has indicated for some Cases under Rule 39.8), and has placed my case in an even more grievous circumstances of what we would refer to as 'selective dismissals' on the issues. Its a very dangerous road to go down when that becomes the 'norm'. Its become very pervasive in Obama's dictatorial ways of governing understood as 'prosecutorial discretion'. Q. Isn't this kind of a light case to be considered as a 'bad behavioral' charge worth 'impeachment' proceedings by Congress on the U.S. Supreme Court Justices? I suppose if your rich you might feel that way, but I see it as a very big STOP SIGN and one that I'm sure hasn't just happened with me. Q. Does pushing this legislation do anything for the Case Considerations of Obama's Ineligibility? No, it doesn't. That is certainly why both Democrats and Republicans should not feel any hesitancy whatsoever in passing Resolutions to began IMPEACHMENT of the Justices for this action. This is really a separate matter and strictly involves removing the 'WAR ON THE POOR" in the punitive actions of not allowing access to the Courts Granting Certs and I think will have far reaching affects that even U.S. Justices are not above the law and that the day they decide that equality and justice under our U.S. Constitution is not a good idea, that's the day they need to consider the Life Tenure for good behavior just came to an End. Q. Can the Court Change its Ruling on your Case to avoid impeachment proceedings? Well, I am not a Justice, but as Justice goes there might be some considerations made for "clerical errors". That is why through the Proceedings of Impeachment Congress can summon the Supreme Court Justices to their Bench and find out exactly who knew what and when. This is just the process we have to go through.
" I say to Americans that if you are going to find Justice for All, and find your U.S. Constitutional Civil Rights in tact, that you had better start looking just a little deeper into the action instead of the words of your favorite Presidential Candidate. "Wither a "clerical error" or some other error the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in Case No. 14-9396 needs to be changed. Mistakes in the Court happen I understand, but correction demands action over words also. "
Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.
Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!
Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!
Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.
1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396
Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin
The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.
Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
FATE OF NATION AND 141 MILLION DOLLARS REST IN HANDS OF CLERK
FEATURED EDITORIAL: The Post & Email
Who says being clerk is a lowly job of no particular importance? That is certainly not the case in the U.S. District Court in the State of Utah where the Chief Justice and Presiding Judge Honorable Ted Stewart just handed the Clerk of the Court the responsibility wherein the fate of the whole United States of America and $141 Million Dollars waits with anticipation on the clerks ruling on a "Default Certificate".
Before submitting the Motion for Default and the Proposed Order I called the Clerk stating a Certificate of Default was necessary to which I was told by the Clerk that it was up to the Judge so I made a Motion for Default and an Order up and sent them in. Now I have an Order from the Judge saying that its up to the Clerk.
Its odd working in the same building with multiple Clerks working tirelessly from 8AM to 4PM Monday through Friday for the Judge himself, and other Clerks working in the receiving room that someone didn't mention something at lunch like "oh yea, did you get the Judy v. Obama Certificate of Default up to Chief Judge Ted Stewart? You know the Defendants were served and didn't respond to the Courts Stamped Summons, and its long past the 20 Days that the Court requested an answer or Default by Judgement would be taken against them."
Well its probably because of the work load! I mean who can keep track of these things, thousands or at least hundreds of cases being filed right? What? What was that, this case is number 93? You mean its September and they haven't had 100 cases filed this year yet? Let's see here, between 14 Judges that's 6.6 lets round that up and say 7 cases per Judge and its the end of the 8th month so, a little less than 1 case per month per Judge.
That is understandably a mystery. I'm sorry, perhaps I am being a tiny bit facetious, but that's how I felt when I read that the Chief Justice was going to "leave the determination to the Clerk of the Court in the first instance.", when he could have made a phone call and got the report from the clerk in 5 minutes.
I actually don't believe the Judge didn't make that phone call, or that his personal Clerk didn't say Hi to the Clerks down stairs or some how didn't talk about it at lunch, on their break, or in passing each other in the halls. That just seems like an impossibility to me especially with those kind of names on the case.
So anyway, today I received from the Presiding Judge Ted Stewart of the United States District Court ((Utah Division)) a August 26th signed MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER OF JUDGEMENT on the Motion For Default and Proposed Order that I submitted to him. If you haven't read the Motion for Default or the Order you can do that here and I'd recommend that you do and after we can discuss a little bit of what we can determine based on what we have so far. That's the really fun part of all of this you political and legal crack junkies you. (smile) Hey if you can't have any fun with this or maintain a sense of humor, you really are in danger of losing it all. We can talk some serious things, and we can laugh and crack a joke or two at the same time.
Now that you've read it thoroughly and have some idea of what we are talking about, especially the MOTION FOR DEFAULT, you can understand Judge Ted Stewarts first paragraph in the Memorandum Decision.
"This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Default Order of Judgement.(reference No. 6 docket) In his Motion, Plaintiff asserts that Defendants have been properly served and have failed to appear or otherwise defend within the time allotted by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. On this basis, Plaintiff seeks a default judgement that includes an award of $141 million in damages."
Can't you just see the Judge looking at his Clerk and very slowly saying, "one hundred forty one million dollars- That's a lot of cash to dismiss in an Motion to Dismiss Default Judgement if it was granted. Whew!"
Before I get to far in to this report, let me just clarify a few basics just in case a few of you decided you didn't want to read the Complaint, the Motion For Default and the Proposed Order. This case actually does something unprecedented in political history! You have probably never thought that a political contribution was an investment that could actually increase in your whole life.
Can't you just see all the contributors of former Gov. Mitt Romney, Sen. John McCain,Sen. Hillary Clinton's and former Senator Barack Obama's 2012 presidential campaign scratching their heads right now trying to even comprehend how a political contribution could increase let say a hundred fold. That's where a $25 dollar contribution is refunded as $2500 because the contribution was given with a certain expectation of the 'rules of the race' and having the rules changed and not being notified of the change before the race started actually caused an inconvenience that needed to be reimbursed because of basically fraudulent circumstances?
Well, that's what I've actually proposed in this law suit that I would do to with every person that actually contributed to my campaign because we didn't know the the "natural born Citizen" qualification had been canceled in the U.S. Constitution by Republicans and Democrats presidential candidates in U.S. Senate Res. 511 where Sen. Hillary Clinton, Sen. Barack Obama and Sen. John McCain all made a deal that it would be changed and every U.S. Senator not apart of that voted for it.
Of course I wasn't there and neither was America or the 300 million Citizens of the U.S. to see the change that a non-binding U.S. Senate resolution had on an Article II of the Constitution that defines the rules and qualifications of the race for President so we just need to get our money back and some damages for not informing us that the U.S. Constitution had been changed, because if we had known it was changed we certainly wouldn't have run the races or contributed our hard earned money.
Can you imagine Mitt Romney doing that? Telling all of his contributors, "Hey you guys deserve a refund and some damages because the rules got changed and I wasn't in on it"? Well, that's kind of what I've said and I think its fair especially when we have a standard and there are rules. So we basically, just get a refund and Obama stays in the Office of the President. Of course that is unless Congress catches wind that a refund has been given to all the contributors based on a breach of the Constitution. Then of course, Congress is free to act as they will given the circumstances.
Those contributing to my campaign I'm sure will be very happy about their refund coming, while there probably will be a few people who contributed to rich Mitt Romney who are still less then satisfied. Oh, so it goes. I mean you certainly get a choice at who your going to support. Can you imagine the disappointment of those who gave to all four McCain, Romney twice, Hillary Clinton, and Obama? They will probably be really disappointed. That's like betting on every horse on the race except the one that won or did some good for you! (hahaha)Who says you have to win the race in order to win on principle? Who says 'principle doesn't pay off?'
Okay, back to the Judge's second paragraph-
"Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a) provides that "[w]hen a party against whom a judgement for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise defend, and that failure is shown by affidavit or otherwise, the clerk must enter the party's default." Then, "[i]f the plaintiff's claim is for a sum certain... the clerk- on Plaintiff's request, with an affidavit showing the amount due-must enter judgement for that amount and cost against a defendant who has been defaulted." (reference Fed R. Civ.P 55 (b)(1). However, where, as here, the judgement sought is not for a sum certain, or for a sum that can be made certain, "the party must apply to the court for a default judgement." (reference 3 Id. 55(b)(2)."
That's kind of a mouthful, but I guess what it means is I need to submit an Affidavit to the Clerk, even though a signed Motion and an Order in my mind is kind of the same thing- an affidavit is sworn to and has a specific amount.
Third Paragraph-
"Plaintiff has applied to the Court for a default judgement. However, Plaintiff has not yet received a default certificate as required by Rule 55 (a). Until Plaintiff receives a default certificate from the Clerk of Court, the Court cannot reach the merits of Plaintiff's Motion for Default Order of Judgement. For this reason, the Court will deny Plaintiff's Motion without prejudice. In so doing, the Court does not reach the merits of Plaintiff's claim of proper service or entitlement to a default certificate. Rather, it will leave that determination to the Clerk of Court in the first instance."
Fourth Paragraph-
"Based on the foregoing, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Default Order of Judgement (Docket No.6) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. DATED this 26th day of August, 2014. (Signed by) U.S. District Judge Ted Stewart"
You know I have to say I think that was very nice of Judge Ted Stewart, I really do. You know when I opened the envelope up I thought here we go, another "DISMISSAL in your face you don't know what the word frivolous means do you? YOU MUST BE STUPID STUPID STUPID", type of an ORDER. I don't feel that way at all with this Order. I think it was very concise and I didn't feel STUPID STUPID STUPID, even though and I'm sure he knows, I could easily qualify for that kind of insult legally speaking with years of inexperience rather then the years of experience he has.
You know I'm never offended with intelligence and quality and I've got a pretty good eye at recognizing quality. Yes, even in my ex-wifes. I sure didn't marry them because they weren't quality women. I never thought to myself, " I wonder why I married her?". I knew why I did, and never regretted it with all three.
So now let's briefly discuss what Judge Stewart didn't do, that he actually could have. If for instance he had DISMISSED the Motion with PREJUDICE or DISMISSED THE COMPLAINT as frivolous that would be the end..good night..turn off the lights. You don't bother the Courts again with this. That's it. He did'nt do that and I love him because he didn't do that and he could have.
There is nothing that means more to my heart then 'good judgement'. Its for me like admiring a supreme performance by a reining horse that spins like a top and slides 60 feet on a lose reign with just a few cues from the rider. That to someone else might be like admiring a really rare piece of art and understanding the artist, the history, and value of a favorite collection, or how about a mother who tries to explain the beauty of her sleeping child as her heart swells with joy this child brings her?
I know it sounds strange, but losing a race the best that you can is every bit as important as winning with your best effort. If you give it all you got and lose, its okay to walk away. When I think about all the "likes" I've got on facebook from the general public people who don't even know me, and their sharing what I've written I am so humbled and filled with gratitude. Its just amazing. When ever I've received a contribution in the mail or on line from my web site I've remembered to thank God for that and treated it just as honorably as the widow's mite Jesus pointed out was so valuable.
Well, that's all the news I have to report today for those you following this case and interested in it. Thanks for sharing and caring.., You really do mean the world to me and I thank you.
If you'd like to contribute to the ABC Campaign (American Birther Campaign)for Cody Robert Judy U.S. President 2016 you can do so on the contribution page of www.codyjudy.us
Sincerely
Cody Robert Judy
Wow!Just found my book, Taking A Stand, on sale at your local B&N for nook users if you prefer over soft or hard bound - only $8.49 That's a Great price
Cody Robert Judy
For U.S. President 2016
If you think “Truth” is worth it, support it and quit supporting the lie. That is the beginning of change, or we can just keep on going down this road and see where it leads with Obama. Which is it going to be?
❤ I loved it!
