Showing posts with label mike lee. Show all posts
Showing posts with label mike lee. Show all posts

Thursday, April 17, 2014

The Federal Government Debt v. Constitutional Debt owed to Bundy & We The People



FEATURED EDITORIAL: The Post & Email

The service ranchers provide in grazing cattle present a valuable offset of cost in fighting wild fires from over grown sage and grass that if not eaten could easily provide fuel in a fire that could devastate wild life and endangered species costing tax payers much more then grazing fees.

The Bundy Ranch blog and facebook continue to be barraged with a deluge of people that simply perpetuate fees said to be owed in their minds of Rancher Cliven Bundy without any consideration other than money owed. This undoubtedly is a charge perpetuated by the Federal Government in every news article and interview manipulating as a ‘justification’ actions of rustling up the round up of Bundy Cattle.

Let’s consider you’re not a cattle man. At one thousand dollars a head/cow, 300 hundred of Bundy’s estimated 900 cattle is equal to $300,000; the amount that I have seen reported that Mr. Bundy says he owes.

The government’s estimate continues to be at 1.1 million. Indeed that would be only one year’s crop or increase of some 900 cattle, which scarcely makes sense in the deed of wiping out at auction a whole herd for all parties involved.
In losing the whole herd what grazing fees might be collected from the desert the following year? None. That of course would decrease revenue for the BLM leading to lay-offs and a reduction of budget. How much could a range fire burning out of control cost tax payers that engulfed ten thousand acres?

The government in a Bundy Cattle loss off the range loses the natural foresting and grazing residual cattle provide decreasing risks of range fires from lighting strikes that could wipe out untold acres used by the desert turtles said to be the reason for removing what the government labeled ‘trespass cattle’, not to mention putting any built Solar Station rumored to be the reason for the Sen. Reid land-grab at higher risks.

One collectively wonders, if reindeer can co-habitat with fenced oil refineries in Alaska why cattle on a desert range cannot co-habitat with a few fenced solar panels? The point is what we are really witnessing is the Government’s willingness to put not only their federal agents involved in danger, but the public in harm’s way at gun point all because of an agenda that doesn’t quite make any sense given the circumstances that are understood by the public being reported even given the extremes represented by both sides of the argument.

Many American's are just waking up to just how far the Government is out of alignment with the ineligibility of Barack Obama reigning supreme in the Office of the President. They have not understood that the Executive Branch’s Bureaus and departments only receive authority under the Constitution by a qualified person in the Office of the President.

Under an empty office in the Office of the President the Government fails to inherit any Constitutional Authority to Act in the duty to enforce the law and there is no agency under the Executive Branch that is not funneled through the Office of the President in the Federal System of the United States of America. This leaves only the State Level of Executive Authority understood in State Governors to maintain at a State Level utter chaos and really leaves Federal Courts and Bureaus in a neutered or ‘deer-in-the-headlight’ gaze as to how to enforce any federal law or statute within the parameters of the law.

The bully method assumes authority that is false assuming and relying on the might-is-right principle, “If you push people and they move you’re in control.” In such a system the individual loses power to act in any Court of law and expect to have success so gangs are formed to fight for property as the law in place of a Constitution.

If the rights of the people are conceded in the Constitution, the elected Offices within the Constitution are just as void. In other words, if law makers are thrilled with their being elected and in power, but refuse to uphold the Constitution their ‘elected representation’ is not upheld by the Constitution either and they are just as easily understood to be without any “authority” or power in the Constitution.

In a recognition of this awful state we are currently in Congress has introduced a "Contempt Act" meant to punish the executive branch of Government's Head Prosecutor Eric Holder for being found in contempt by in affect refusing or removing his salary from the budget.

The purse strings that pay the executive branch are indeed one of the two mechanisms granted to Congress to slightly rein the Executive Branch, and the other is a disability impeachment proceeding meant to secure a qualified person in the Office as well as try accusations of contemptible or criminal actions of the President.

Just about a month ago Congress passed what was called the "Enforce The Law Act" which was contemptuous of Obama not enforcing the law introduced by South Carolina's 4th congressional district R. Rep. Trey Gowdy. Obama’s duck and dive of Obamacare has brought this on escalated also by a few other things like Obama’s declaration that Congress was not in session as a time to write orders when they were in session and the lack of cooperation in dozens of scandals Congress has tried to manage to lay some blame for with constituents in a rage.

The truth is no body remains at this time more responsible for the mess then Congress as they have failed to ACT as the check and balance they were designed to be on the Executive Branch in seeing to it first the Office of the President was at the very least occupied by a constitutionally qualified person.

In a blazing piece burning through the internet now which has been this blogs 'Most Viewed' , the diagram of the Executive Branch was featured with a reminder the Constitution gave no powers to any of these departments and secretaries outside the Office of the President being filled with a qualified person according to the Constitution’s demands for the office for a natural born citizen.

Essentially pointing out that the Executive Branch has gone rogue with Obama and is lacking in enforcement authority to even be on Bundy’s ranch demanding settlement by the Order of a Court in the Federal Judicial Branch.
In examining this so called ‘debt’ that Mr. Bundy owes, especially all these liberals with a chant to seize the cattle and shoot anyone who stands in the way, if its ‘law’ that your relying on then you must consider the 40 MILLION DOLLARS that the Government owes me for changing the rules in the race that allowed Barack Obama to run for and take the office of the President.

Indeed if I had been aware, before getting in the 2008 and 2012 presidential contest that the Office of the President requirement for a ‘natural born citizen’ had been rescinded and was no longer in place I would not have got in for the estimation made on winning the race would have clearly been made moot.

The rules of the race; the laws of the race if you will were indeed clear to me that the qualification for the Office of the President required a ‘natural born citizen’. I knew McCain was not a natural born citizen and I knew Obama was not a natural born citizen, so I knew I could win as I got in the race, objected to their qualification and the law was upheld.

I jest; the laws of the race were not changed but were certainly violated and my complaints were scoffed at by the Judicial Branch and have been thus far also scoffed at by the Legislative Branch, but I am owed by the law 40 Million dollars in damages for my respective campaigns.

Your anger must be directed at them as they skirted the law; allowing Obama who is not a natural born citizen in. The fact Obama admits his father as Kenyan at the time of his birth prohibits him from the Office of the President. Obama himself handing out his long form birth certificate that represents his father as Kenyan at birth clearly inherits citizenship from his father. No dual citizenship is allowed in the Office of the President.

You don’t have to be a ‘Birther’ to figure out a foreign citizenship is inherited from Obama's father who is Kenyan.

The Office of the President was never assumed to be regulated by a foreigner's allegiance; one who wasn’t born to Citizen Parents, and secondly also, wasn’t born in the United States. Born in the U.S. to Citizen parents is and remains the qualification and these laws were broken and the cost have been laid upon me as a candidate unfairly and unconstitutionally for the Office of the President I was/am qualified for.

Recently, my own Utah U.S. Senator, one many would say was one of the most conservative in the U.S. Senate drippeled the pathetic stand that Obama's mother was a U.S. Citizen and thus Obama was a U.S. Citizen. I simply ask what about the respect to Obama's father who was Kenyan. We have said Obama was Kenyan because his father was Kenyan and dual citizenship is not allowed in the Office of the President.

Citizen is not the qualification for President anyway, although it is the stated requirement for U.S. Senate and a U.S. Representative, the President is different. The U.S. Constitution says the President can be a "Citizen" if a "Citizen" at the time of the adoption of the Constitution, otherwise the Office must be filled with a 'Natural Born Citizen'.

Two generations serve as a natural defense line for the Office of the President: Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents.


In the Constitution itself we have two different references towards a status of those qualified for the Office of the President. That directs there are two types of citizens not one.

In the video of Sen. Lee's answer he states "At this point.."



In so many words Sen. Lee says at this point we are left with Obama as president. He won two elections. I ran against Sen. Lee in Utah in 2010 and used the facts that Mike Lee was a 'tabloid conservative' because he had no stomoche to consider Obama's identification fraud upon the public as a menace to society and the greatest assault upon our national security and sovereignty since Pearl Harbor and WWII. The Japanese didn't walk into the White House they only bombed Pearl Harbor.

The deaths in WWII were mild compared to the lost opportunity of untold generations to come for an unconstitutional USA. Its as if Sen. Mike Lee were to walk around in the blood of those who have died for the Constitution as if he and his family were on a Summer Vacation on a nice Spring Day smiling and waving his hands because Obama wasn't caught and was elected under completely fabricated and false elections, and then to treat that as a 'warning' like a police officer would cite you for going 5 miles over the speed limit.

Its just a warning? My God, the whole national security of our Nation is compromised! The whole Executive Branch of Government is without Authority under an unqualified person in the Office of the President! Is usurpation Ok if you get away with it for 5 or 6 years?

How indeed can the U.S. Government collect a dime from Mr. Cliven Bundy when such has rocked the U.S.A.?

I am compelled to offer the U.S. Federal Government a deal. You can take Mr. Cliven Bundy's owed amount off the amount you owe me, and we will settle this as gentlemen. I offer this sincerely in light of the debt owed to me for your unparalleled sycophantic breach of moral aptitude with nefarious consideration towards the principles of the United States Constitution.

If you Ladies and Gentlemen in Washington DC have no moral character as to disdain not one but two Presidential Elections breached by the criminal identification fabrication of Obama, seen as nothing more then insult to the Office of the President in total disregard for our U.S. Constitution, I dare say the very document that allowed your own election you have shredded leaving you unworthy of any said office let alone one defined in regiment by the U.S Constitution for which your disdain has been signed in a mockery of patriot blood.

Let the House of Representatives approve that debt, the Constitutional Debt to us paid in full.

Harry Reid said:
“Clive Bundy does not recognize the United States,” Reid said. “The United States, he says, is a foreign government. He doesn’t pay his taxes. He doesn’t pay his fees. And he doesn’t follow the law. He continues to thumb his nose at authority.”

I wonder about the "Constitutional Authority" that Sen. Reid has thumbed his nose at supporting a usurpation of the U.S. Constitution in an ineligible and unqualified Barack/Barry Obama/Soetoro?

Wise up..fight smart.

Cody Robert Judy

P.S.

If Obama's Ineligibility has no weight at the BLM, or to you for that matter,neither does the keys to our whole military stuffed inside a birthday cake for Vladimir Putin.

We sure want to thank everyone for the Views! Believe it your impact is being felt as you spread the word and do it in an educated intelligent way. You are the salt of the Earth - God Bless You!

Obama Eligibility 4 Dummies.
If you have no clue of Sheriff Joe's Cold Case Posse investigation concluding Obama's identification is a fraud, how you can write your elected leaders urging them to conduct hearings, I also am pushing for as a Candidate for PRES and took to the U.S. Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama Case 12-5276, go to this website and take the two part challenge. With your help America is made stronger and it will cost you some time and a couple of stamps. What have you done lately to protect this opportunity we have in the United States? We need your help. Oh, and pass it on. http://obamaseligibility.com/index.html

How You Can Help

Obama's long form birth certificate has been exhumed to be nothing more than a long form fabrication by professional law enforcement standards and that was brought to the attention of the United States Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama 12-5276, for which I served as the Presidential Candidate running in the Democratic Party and after the primary, as an Independent Presidential Candidate securing the 'standing' necessary for the complaint in 2012 and 2013.

Orrin Hatch R - U.S Senator from Utah and Mitch McConnell R- U.S. Senator from Kentucky just requested two sheriffs kits produced by Michael Volin of WheresObamasBirthCertificate.com (WOBC) with the purpose of informing the public and elected officials of the forgery of the long-form birth certificate image posted since April 27, 2011 on the White House website. These kits (Get Yours Free Here) contain the same evidence released in March 1,2012 (and a little more) that I included in my case against Obama that went from Georgia State- Georgia State Supreme- to U.S. Supreme 12-5276 in Judy v. Obama. There will also be a Sheriff Kit 2 that will follow the coming revelations of the Cold Case Posse set to be released in a short time.

Please urge and encourage your Representatives to OPEN AND TRANSPARENT HEARINGS in the House of Representatives on Obama's eligibility as the solution to eliminating Obamacare. These hearings must be held and the evidence must be heard that are in the Sheriff's kits most all of the Representatives have received now.

If these hearings are conducted in the open and reported in the open, the evidence will mount collectively and the U.S. Senate although it has a majority of Democrats will have to concede to the facts and evidences or will be seen as completely unfit for their duties and as incompetent. Utah would most likely see more benefits come from supporting the Candidates like myself, (well, Candidate as myself because there were no other candidates in the entire U.S.A. who stood up for principle regardless of party), fighting for equal protections under the law in pushing for Open and Transparent Hearings in Congress with two million dollars on Obama's Verification Eligibility qualification hearings on the stage to remove him as a disability according to Amend 14, Sec.3 would be a lot faster solution.

Like CODY ROBERT JUDY'S NEW 2016 PAGE ON FACEBOOK HERE
Follow me on Twitter: Official Cody Robert Judy 2016 on Tweeter here

If you want to join the NFT-VA like the Group on Facebook and make sure we can find the City and State in which you reside.

You Can Help Me [ If you would like to help Cody Robert Judy in his bid for upholding the Constitution in “America’s Birther Campaign”, or ABC Campaign, which highlights the United States Constitution with information and education for voters to understand the tough questions politicians should be answering in 2014, and in the coming 2016 election for the Office of the President please make a contributions here:

We pray for the Lord to save our Country and restore America from the dilapidation we now find ourselves, and the principles of the Constitution in. For this I am Taking A Stand.

Sincerely, Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us www.codyjudy.blogspot.com YouTube: CODY JUDY / CODE4PRES TV Get Cody's Book: Taking A Stand



























Tuesday, November 19, 2013

FAX Your Solution to Your Senator and Represenative



Find your FAX : YOUR U.S. SENATORS
Find your FAX : U.S Represenatives

Dear GOP Leader Eric Cantor of The House of Representatives/
Chairman Issa of the Gov. Oversight/
Chairman Goodlatte Chairman House Judiciary Comm.

Please read these two post/links given below and consider my testimony as a key to stopping Obamacare through the legal demand that ACTS of Congress first must be signed by a qualified President according to the demands of the U.S.C. for the Office of the President to become law.

Eliminating the Race Card of Obama and the Partisan Politics on O's Eligibility.
http://www.codyjudy.blogspot.com/2013/11/why-and-what-congress-is-debating-in.html

Letter to Sen. Harry Reid released Oct 31st according to the time period mentioned.
http://www.codyjudy.blogspot.com/2013/10/breaking-report-senator-harry-reid.html

Thank you for this consideration. The factual evidence is overwhelming and I as a candidate for President in the Democratic Party was subject to injury without Judicial Hearing from the United States Supreme Court Judy v. Obama 12-5276 twice 2012, and January 2013. I have no other recourse but to appeal to Congress to hear the evidence and facts with my standing on the principle of eligibility of the Office of the President untainted by 'race' because I first in 2008 took Sen. McCain to court on his eligibility prior to his receiving the nomination. This will make a difference as it’s the principle I've held up as a candidate without regard to race, the main complaint of mainstream media.

I am a candidate willfully run-over against the laws of our Constitution and I demand a House Hearing to relay the U.S. Supreme Court Clerks 6 month delay in giving me a case number only after 2 other cases from Georgia came to the Court with no Presidential candidates so as to slide my case in with theirs as "without standing" and strategically placing the court "out of session" to hear my case. If I had been given a case number without any problems or changes made I would have been heard the session before the election.

The damages I've suffered compel justice Sir. I should not have to bear this burden of injustice especially with the legal and professional witnesses of law and order testifying to my cause and complaint.
I await your response and answer to my request with a "Yes" or "No".

Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us
Contact Info.
Provided


Signature : ¬¬¬¬¬s/s/Cody Robert Judy




Cover Letter
Eric Cantor Chairman Issa – House Over sight
Richmond Gov. Reform and Oversight Comm.
F: 804.747-5308 FAX: (202) 225-3974

Culpeper Chairman Goodlatte- House Judicial Com
F: 540.825-8964 FAX 202-225-7680

Washington, DC
F: 202.225-0011

Links to: Proceeding LTR
Links to: FAX verification


Americans are encouraged to proceed to their local FAX Machines located at pretty much any Office paper product store and for about $2 FAX the same to their own state U.S. House of Representative and U.S. Senator to increase the lava flow for the upcoming contest that involves their own freedom and liberty.

Like CODY ROBERT JUDY'S NEW 2016 PAGE ON FACEBOOK HERE
Follow me on Twitter: Official Cody Robert Judy 2016 on Tweeter here

You Can Help Me
[ If you would like to help Cody Robert Judy in his bid for upholding the Constitution in “America’s Birther Campaign”, or ABC Campaign ,which highlights the United States Constitution with information and education for voters to understand the tough questions politicians should be answering in 2014, and in the coming 2016 election for the Office of the President please make a contributions here:
Sincerely,

Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODY JUDY / CODE4PRES TV
Get Cody's Book: Taking A Stand



Sunday, October 13, 2013

Raising Barricades Obama Shifts Complacence with "How to Make Obamacare Moot" w Eligibility Hearing.


Raising Barricades Obama Shifts Complacence with "How to Make Obamacare Moot" w Eligibility Hearing.


When was the last time you saw barricades erected by the Government taken down by veterans in America? You'd have to go back a few years for sure.. maybe even to Vietnam war protest by many of the same people in office now who are radical extremist or progressive.

Obamacare is only 1 ELIGIBILITY HEARING away from being made "MOOT". Let's get it done in The House! Representative John Carter of Texas described Mr. Obama as “acting like a royal president.”

“He’s still ‘my way or the highway,'” Mr. Carter said.

If Republicans needed any reminder about how outraged their most conservative supporters would be if they committed to a compromise that did not include provisions to weaken the health care law, they needed look no further than out the window. Glenn Beck, the fiery radio personality, was leading a group of Tea Party activists on the National Mall.

China called for an end to the use of the US dollar as the international reserve currency, a step that would ensure the international community could maintain a safe distance from the side-effects of domestic political turmoil in the United States.

Going one step further from China's official news agency,'the creation of a "de-Americanised world"' was called for, saying, 'the destinies of people should not be left in the hands of a hypocritical nation with a dysfunctional government'

Wonder what was happening today in Washington DC? U.S. Senator Ted Cruz and Mike Lee were raising the questions surrounding the Government's spending money to keep people out of National Parks and Monuments during the Government shutdown.

The barricades put up by the Government were being removed and packed off to the White House. 'On Sunday, protesting the barricades placed at memorials around Washington D.C. by the vindictive Obama administration, veterans removed the barricades and proceeded to take them to the White House. Multiple people tweeted photos of the barricades being removed and taken for presidential inspection':
http://landing.newsinc.com/shared/video.html?freewheel=90085&sitesection=breitbart_nws_pol_sty_vmppap&VID=25253383

Protestors who included veterans of the Korean, Vietnam, WWII, Gulf, Iraq and Afghanistan wars, took those barricades and carried them about 3/4ths of a mile to a sidewalk in front of White House and piled the barricades


Before Americans wake-up with their paycheck garnished empirically, because Obamacare was not signed by a qualified President, the House has got to fight this all the way and go back to point A wherein the Constitution says you must be a 'natural born citizen' defined very well as those born in American to Citizen parents, and hold hearings with the information brought by a Candidate for President with standing that includes the Cold Case Posse evidence Obama's long form birth certificate is nothing more then a fabrication and he is not qualified. The 2012 election was stolen in more then one way, so the radical extremist didnt put all their eggs in one basket.

Americans should be asking why Obamacare hasn't been fairly administered, while the White House encrust itself in a gold plated health care and Congress and many Corporations are either exempted or transferring their people to an unproven system that resembles the barricades being piled up at the foot of a usurped White House?

People are very fearful the subsidy to purchase healthcare will no where near match what they have already and that's just one of 100 unintended consequence of Obamacare that the Republican House is fighting for delay on instead of opening up hearings on an unqualified occupant of the White House which would make Obamacare moot very quickly!

My fight for the Eligibility of the President began in 2007-8 with Judy v. McCain, so leave your comments at the garbage of those who claim its only a 'racist' argument, and mine certainly has included Obama and as my Dec. 2007 letter to the U.S. Supreme Court explained is based on the principle of the Constitution for which re-construction is prohibited unless authorized expressly by Amendment.

Of course I continued that legal representation in 2012 with Judy v. Obama 12-5276 that in 2012, and 2013 were encased in the United States Supreme Court without a hearing, and with some very shady things happening I have rehearsed in other entries.

This could be so valuable to the Republicans in the House at this time if they would only see it and decide tis better to take a stand for the Constitution then compromise with the enslavement of a Nation. Pass it on to your Senators and House Representatives in your home state, because coming from you it will make a difference to them.

As the shutdown continues, I can only hope that House Speaker Boehner see's and hears from you exactly what needs to be heard at this time. First that the Eligibility Card is the action necessary to clean the White House up, and second, that compromise is not an option with FRAUD, FORGERY, and THEFT of many American generations. Taking a Stand is essential.

Please send this to your Representatives and Senators and enjoy my new single and the link to help my campaign for President 2016 and the ABC Campaign (American Birthers Campaign). We maybe the only people left between you and the IRS tax of Obamacare!
AMERICAN KING -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PT3Sq5Z-hCo



I AM AMERICANhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=4otwMXGzvac


>
[ If you would like to help Cody Robert Judy in his bid for upholding the Constitution in “America’s Birther Campaign”, or ABC Campaign ,which highlights the United States Constitution with information and education for voters to understand the tough questions politicians should be answering in 2014, and in the coming 2016 election for the Office of the President please make a contributions here: ]
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODY JUDY / CODE4PRES



Wednesday, September 18, 2013

Top Secret Report Leaked: Congress Has The Eligibility of Obama in Their Sites


Its been a quietly kept secret in Congress, but this week word leaked out that the case on Barack Obama's eligibility to be President is indeed in the cross-hairs of Congress but here's the surprise, it has just as much to do with the Republicans as it does the Democrats, which would be required for it to have success.

The most promising case, (that would be a reverse on Judicial Review whereby the Judicial Branch usually reviews a law passed by Congress as abiding by the Constitution or not), for Congress in the eligibility arena is indeed the low profile case of Democratic Party Candidate for President Cody Robert Judy that landed without a hearing in the United States Supreme Court Judy v. Obama 12-5276 because of its multiple reviewed index in 2012 and January 2013.

Barack Obama's coat-tails just aren't what they used to be, and in the face of mounting evidence his long form birth certificate is a forgery,the devastation prospect of de-funding Obamacare with the House Revolution gaining steam,with champions R- Sen Mike Lee UT and R- Ted Cruz -TX Senate, Democrats are coming off the coat-tails of Obama in many ways with the 2014 elections looming and the American People still seething over Syria, Benghazi, NSA spying,IRS profiling and over a dozen more scandals pointing directly at the White House.

Sheriff Joe's Cold Case Posse was given the task of determining simply wither identity documents handed out by Obama from the White House Press Core Room were authentic or if it represented an act of fraud or deception. The first step in that would be determining if the document Obama handed out was authentic or a fabrication.

Lead investigator of that Cold Case Posse Mike Zullo's determination that the document was indeed a fraud was also indeed slipped into Cody Robert Judy's Georgia State Court case against Barack Obama as an eligible candidate who by his actions of fraud was actually hindering Cody's campaign for president in the Democratic Party Primaries in 2012.

Sheriff Joe's Cold Case Posse findings were released March 1st,2012, and the findings were promptly inserted as legal evidence in collaboration of Cody's insistence that Barack Obama was not a natural born citizen qualified for the Office of the President by the demands of the Constitution as far back as before the 2008 Election where Cody inserted a U.S. Supreme Court Case against Barack Obama in an Emergency Motion filed to the Federal District Court case he had against Sen. John McCain and the Republican National Committee. Judy v. McCain Case Number:2:2008cv01162
Filed: September 3, 2008
, that had to do with the same issue and McCain not being a natural born citizen with his foreign birth in Panama's local hospital.

In the following interview with Detective Mike Zullo supporting evidence from document expert and witness in the Alabama Supreme Court are discussed, though the first 2 minutes is repeated in the video, one can skip ahead to see the entirety.

New Interview w Mike Zullo



The importance of this is also termed in legal jargon as having objected to qualification before Obama entered into office not only in 2012 but in 2008 which maintains the grievance as unsatisfied by justice with prima facia evidence before trial which is sufficient to prove the case, which then led to the egregious manner in which Cody's case was handled by the Clerks of the United States Supreme Court.

Cody's case was sent to the Court some 7 months and over 7 times before he was actually given a case number. The only significant difference upon which Cody was granted a case number was the two other Georgia Case's having to do with Obama's eligibility that had also made their way up to the Untied States Supreme Court in theory giving the Clerks cover for a dismissal on "Standing".

You might ask what "Standing" is and why it was used in this manner to dismiss so many of the Obama eligibility cases.
There are three standing requirements:

1)Injury: The plaintiff must have suffered or imminently will suffer injury—an invasion of a legally protected interest that is concrete and particularized. The injury must be actual or imminent, distinct and palpable, not abstract. This injury could be economic as well as non-economic.
2)Causation: There must be a causal connection between the injury and the conduct complained of, so that the injury is fairly traceable to the challenged action of the defendant and not the result of the independent action of some third party who is not before the court.
3)Redressability: It must be likely, as opposed to merely speculative, that a favorable court decision will redress the injury.

Judy v. Obama 12-5276 case represented the ONLY case which satisfied all three directives of the "Standing" argument, however, if you want this to be covered-up, what do you do?

You wait until there are two other cases from the same State Supreme Court to come up where the "Standing" argument can be used because there is no candidate for President in them, and you shove the one where the "Standing" argument is not applicable in between them and call it an innocent mistake.

That's exactly what happened with Judy v. Obama 12-5276, and hearings in Congress can get to the bottom of it very quickly!

The biggest reason Congress has kept it a secret is that it is not something that is a mystery to its conclusion. Once it starts its over for Obama because even Democrats in the United States Senate would be forced into submission in the overwhelming face of hard and convicting evidence.

[ If you would like to help Cody Robert Judy in his bid for upholding the Constitution in “America’s Birther Campaign”, or ABC Campaign ,which highlights the United States Constitution with information and education for voters to understand the tough questions politicians should be answering in 2014, and in the coming 2016 election for the Office of the President please make a contributions here: ]
http://www.codyjudy.us/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm



Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODY JUDY / CODE4PRES

P.S.
Enjoy my dedicated song to the issue of Congress's verification hearings on Obama's Eligibility
Big Things Happen Everyday

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OkjByT7ELfY





Wednesday, October 13, 2010

Cody Judy challenges DEBATE for Ballot Contenders Mike,Sam,& Scott in U.S. Senate Race Utah








As the time for the voters to become familiar with all their choices on Nov. 2nd 2010 draws closer, I would like to extend my invitation to debate all the U.S. Senate Candidates listed on the ballot Mike Lee for Republicans, Sam Granato for Democrats, and Scott Bradley for Constitution Party.

Just a word or two about each.
1- Mr. Scott Bradley believes that non-citzen terroris should be given the same rights as an American Citizen, which I believe pollutes and dilutes the privilege of U.S. Citizenship towards global citzenery.
2- Mr. Sam Granato may be the one candidate that I am just not sure has even read read the Constitution as I have watched a few of his answers interviews. When asked about certain measures he has responded over generally rather then specifically as if 'being our brothers keeper' was his answer to most everything Constitutionally speaking. Well, that is in line with the socialist point and he loves Obama and believes it's a health care ought to be a Constitutional right.
3- Mr. Mike Lee has pretty much laid down the gauntlet on Social Security and Medicare stating "not one more dime" you can see here and for a guy who says he believes in the Constitution sure wants to change it a lot, and never mentions Barack Hussien Obama's lack of Constitutional Qualifications.:



Here is the email I tried to send to Mr.Scott Bradley personally several times with a server error coming up on his 'contact' page. I also tried to tie this to my comment on Connor Boyacks' Connors Connundrums blog, but my comments have been cut off.

So last chance I had was to publically offer this up for discussion to all who might read this. I'm available for a debate.

Dear Mr. Bradley /or/Representatives:
Thank you for running as a candidate for U.S. Senate. I would like the opportunity to debate Mr. Scott Bradley and offer myself available at his convenience as far as time and place.

Personally I believe it will foster greater education, and a debate that both Mike Lee and Sam Granato will probably refuse to attend. If this is appealing to you-

Please contact me with your answer at codyjudy@hotmail.com
Cody Robert Judy
Write-in Cody Judy U.S. Senate
U.S. Senate 2010 Utah
www.codyjudy.us

Post Script:
2:10 pm I was able to extend the invitiation and link of this blog on Mike Lee's U.S. Senate page on facebook, Sam Grananot's U.S. Senate page on facebook, and also Scott Bradley's U.S. Senate page on facebook as follows.

Cody Judy challenges DEBATE in U.S. Senate Race for all of Utah
http://codyjudy.blogspot.com/2010/10/cody-judy-challenges-debate-for-ballot.html

Tuesday, October 12, 2010

Connor Boyacks' Questions Answered at Connors Connundrum




Here are a few questions that I found Mike Lee, Sam Granato avoiding that Scott Bradley of the Constitution Party did address. I think they are good questions so I answered them myself as a WRITE-IN CANDIDATE for U.S. Senate here in Utah.

http://www.connorboyack.com/blog/eight-questions-three-candidates-one-response

1. What should be done in regards to our current military engagements in the Middle East, and why?

After 911 we were supposed to be after bin Laden, but we went into Iraq. We have a huge investment there now as well as Afghanistan, the longest running war in our history. While many of our politicians believe whole heartedly we should be in the business of nation building and policing, it must be recognized that a common way to wage a long term war against the U.S. is by and through our economy by engaging us in these practices. By and through the demolition of our economy can our Constitution and National Sovereignty come to a precarious halt? I say oh yes it can, and oh yes it has been planned.

As a balance of power, our influence has not promulgated a single nation abroad to adopt our Constitution, nor has the population of those we have supposedly freed and liberated from tyrants acted on any debt of gratitude with repayment of our military and blood. These facts should give us a clue to the fact that we are in some regards supporting tyrants and despotism in a degree that is anti-constitution and does not serve us domestically. We then should act in Congress responsibly under our own Constitution and by that, the People.

Perhaps We The People don’t fully understand the problematic despotism that exist among greater thresholds of power, such as China or Russia, and the bases in Afghanistan and Iraq serve a purpose of balance that has served us well? Leaving that open for military advisors and until we knew and understood this exactly however it is easy providence to simply say we shouldn’t be sticking our nose in the business of nation building and policing states in a direction that we could hold as subversive to our own Constitution: and if it were an excuse not to engage in those practices, it would seem to serve and save a lot of our own money that could be better put to use in affairs domestically that are in dire straits now and that would give a better rate of return.

To sum it up simply, involvement in the degree we have invested in these wars in the Middle East has netted us, as I would imagine supporters would say an insurance policy of peace. That is to conclude that the same investment made in our people in our country would have been destroyed by those necessarily opposed to us had the foreign investment not occurred; so it was essential not to make the investment domestically.

I personally just don’t believe that. I also believe that when we start paving our streets with pure gold we could say something was happening that was right, and that attraction towards that right might be a higher influence to those foreign as they heard and saw the affects of a true liberated, free people, under a Constitution as ours. Who knows, they, under their own God given rights then might consider a closer adoption of our Constitution seriously.

2. What should be done with the Federal Reserve, and why?

Scott Bradley says the Fed should be audited and then done away with. I say why waste the money auditing them first? Congress has the right to coin money, and the Fed simply ought to be responsible to Congress if they were to exist at all. This means I believe no higher authority within the United States ought to exist then by law of our Constitution, who holds ever Congressmen to a standard of qualification, and even holds the President to a line of qualification. Need any more be said to a Federal Reserve who believes an audit or a responsibility to Congress is troublesome?

By their own standards, the Fed has failed us without ramifications to the Glass Segal Act Repeal (GSA) that placed our economy at risk to exactly what happened with the housing bubble, that by the way was created. Yes, the GSA set up a regulatory firewall between commercial and investment bank activities, both of which were curbed and controlled. The Bank Holding Company Act further separated financial activities by creating a wall between insurance and banking. Oddly enough it was in the surplus years of the Clinton Administration that the ground work was laid that would create the housing crisis.

The Federal Reserve basically came out in open rebellion of their own founder Senator Carter Glass, a former Treasury secretary and the founder of the U.S. Federal Reserve System, and the lessons learned in 1933 in the wake of the 1929 stock market crash. There is more safety in the Constitutional Restraints that require a 2/3rd majority to change Amendments than a Fed who resents the implication that they must tell Congress what foreign banks received our money.

3. What is your position on the war on drugs, and the legalization of marijuana?
It’s a States Right issue, plain and simply by our Constitution. I know $55,000 to incarcerate a prisoner in an empire building system of incarceration is breaking America’s back. It would seem the Federal Statutes imposed upon States in this regard is a form of emotional blackmail forcing States to incarceration standards and the forum to fill up their Prisons. I believe the States can make more sense of this and reduce their incarceration cost and improve their rehabilitation resource centers if the Feds would get out of the way. I think California’s bankrupt state-of-economy resounds this with “see what I mean” emphasis.

4. What is the constitutional authority for our current immigration law? What reforms, if any, do you support?

I support Federal Laws living up to the duty of securing our Nation. Ronald Reagan said a Nation without borders is no Nation. How true that is, and with Congress regulating our Sovereignty the least they could do would be to enforce the parameters of our Constitution held in high regard last I checked by the United States, and not held in high regard by any other foreign nation. I do not believe any citizen of the United States wants people in here who are not here on work permits or student visa’s.

Illegal immigration is illegal, and I think our citizens have a right to the protection of the United States. When considering work permits for a specific period of time the same consideration we give foreign exchange students, I don’t think that is unfair. What I do think is unfair is a disrespect by our own Government for the laws we expect and they are duty bound to uphold in the United States especially in a time of war. It is a dereliction of sanity and domestic tranquility to engage in 2 foreign wars but refuse to maintain the perimeters of the Nation and if any domestic crisis should occur I think it’s just compensation to present indictments towards the dereliction of protection of our People, and the commitments of our Constitution, when the least of our borders, considered our front door or those at home, are forsaken or held in low esteem in contrast to the the parameters of any military unit held in a foreign war. Is it not a breach of commons sense to open the front door of your house and then to send the military out to guard the 40 across the street you don’t own? Is this not an invitation to catastrophe whilst in the midst of two foreign wars?

5. Do non-citizen terrorists have any constitutional rights?

No, to say they do is to dilute our Constitution, our Borders, and our National Sovereignty to a foreign citizenry who has not done a thing to uphold our standard of freedom and liberty but has done everything to tear it down. Non citizen terrorist are to be treated under the rules of our military courts and Geneva Convention. This affords them protection from those who have captured them to the State and assures as prisoners of war that they will be treated humanely without any adverse discrimination and that their medical needs must be met.

They have no Miranda rights as non-citizens, and those are exclusive to the umbrella of our citizens holding in higher regard the nature of man. To serve a non-citizen terrorist the same constitutional rights as our citizens is a recipe to extrapolate the U.S. Citizen into a Global Citizenry. If the world wants our U.S. Citizen rights, then by all means they can adopt them their selves for they are not foreign to them but are known and perversely dis regarded.

6. Are you for or against term limits, and if for them, in what form?
We have them, they are called elections. Term limits further deliberated outside our Constitution were known and rejected by our forefathers as not a solution to the problems that people champion them to be.

7. Is a balanced budget inherently problematic, or only because it may possible trigger a constitutional convention?

Our Constitution if it is adhered to affords and in fact champions a balanced budget. While the reasons for going in debt such as war and protection have been diluted by Congress, The People retain the rights to vote out of office those who offer such poor counsel for our Country as to consistently waste our treasury on poor investments.

8. How should tariffs be used? How do you define economic protectionism, and do you support it?

We must return to a balance of our trade with all nations squarely in order to implement domestic solvency. To discriminate with the degree of righteousness as in MFN status, has polluted our Tariff power while we have shipped off shore our jobs and independence. One could look at this as if to say this nation is better than this nation as far as human rights but no nation has adopted our Constitution so they all fall short. We are not in the business with commerce to govern nations accepting with the use of declared embargos. Embargoes can lose their leverage with a dilution of trade, so it would sure up embargo power if we would quit discriminating among nations who all fall short of our Constitution and implement our Tariff Power indiscriminately as Congress sees fit leveling the playing field.
I believe we could sure up in this way the decision of Corporations to assume the advantages in keeping factories here rather than shipping them out. By God there really ought to be some advantage to producing here in America that we can find that is sound in a fair capitalism. The unfairness has been to tie consistently one arm behind our own backs whilst slave labor in foreign countries is said to be the winner of capitalism?

The disregard of Tariffs as protections of our Nation is as delinquent a protection of our economy as mass immigration is to our citizenry in the maintenance of the United States. Will Congress abandon the notion that slavery is un-constitutional here, but adopt through the lack of Tariffs the notion that slave labor is ok? Why don’t they, GOD FORBID, be un-hypocritical about it and just repeal Amendment XIII and XIV and bring it back to our soil?

America has always been competitive. We have won the lucrative competitive race several times over which has allowed us great abilities for charity. We need to protect that, protect our American workers, protect our independence, and use our Constitution as a first line of defense. It has been through the dilution of American principle found within our Constitution that our economy has troubled.
9- The question I’ll add to this scenario is the question addressing the Constitutional Qualification of our President, held within our Constitution. The fact is neither Mike Lee, Sam Granato, or Scott Bradley address this question on which hangs most all the socialist policies that conservatives are worried about:

Is Barack Hussein Obama Constitutionally eligible through the qualifications set for in our Constitution to be President?

On this question hangs our nation slipping into a socialistic chaotic and destructive nightmare and those running for office not addressing the most basic, yet most powerful principle in our Constitution which is our President’s pen.

Obama’s pen signed Health Care Bill into law
Obama’s pen signed The Financial Reform Bill into law
Obama’s pen that refuses to sign the Bush Tax cuts into permanent law.

Arrest Obama’s pen through his own fraud and we arrest our Country back from his madness. The following link represents the work that I’ve done in the past to bring this to Justice. I believe it is without a doubt the business and the duty of the U.S. Senate.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/22288917/Judy-v-Obama

Cody Robert Judy
U.S. Senate 2010 Utah
Write-In Cody Judy
www.codyjudy.us

Saturday, July 24, 2010

Utah Celebrates 24th of July and Cody pledges Obama Trial Nov. 3rd,2010



Wow it’s the 4th of July all over again for Utah on the 24th of July! We get spoiled with rodeo, parades, barbeque, and of course fireworks. On July 24th 1847 the first pioneer wagons blazed into the Salt Lake Valley. We are very proud of our entry into the Union as an Independent State within the union of the United States of America but it took a long time!

July 24th isn’t the Utah’s entry into Statehood, which was Jan 4th 1846 as the 45th State into the Union, but many artificially recognize it as a celebration of peculiar nature for the State origin, so it’s easy to mix up. The 24th of July is officially known as Pioneer Day. Of course images of the pioneers coming into the Salt Lake Valley stir up memories of exactly why they had come, and that clearly was to escape religious persecution. Utah’s Constitution is an Ace ahead of the United States Constitution when it comes to religious persecution, which I’m very considerate, respectful, and thankful for.

The unique particular of Utah becoming a State into the Union- During the 1870s and 1880s, laws were passed and federal marshals assigned to punish and harass polygamists, confiscate church property, jail polygamists and deny jury trials or voting rights to all polygamists. In the 1890 Manifesto, the LDS Church finally agreed to ban polygamy.

When Utah applied for statehood again in 1895, it was accepted. One of the conditions for granting Utah statehood was that a ban on polygamy be written into the state constitution. This was a condition required of other western states that were admitted into the Union later. Statehood was officially granted on January 4, 1896, over 30 years after the 60,000 population requirement for statehood had been met.

This of course today is seen as a travesty in the face of U.S.C. Amendment I. which states “that Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;” The Christian Bible clearly did not abdicate polygamy, nor did it sustain same sex marriage as many of the States in modern time have passed. The unintended consequences of de-population have contributed to a host of problems that we are seeing now, which ironically, polygamy may have helped making it a ‘law of nature’ that has consequences in not being followed by mankind.

The biggest irony of this clearly,( ¾ of the world actually practices polygamy, and here may be a reason) is the desperate attempt now for the Federal Government to fund entitlement programs without an up and coming generation of Americans. People wonder why Washington has the audacity and hope to consider mass population with amnesty programs? Clearly it is an attempt to come up with contributions towards Social Security, Medicare, and any other underfunded Government Program that may need some funds because younger people just are not having as many children for which these programs for the elderly were to be shouldered and actually depend upon.
We are all familiar with the number of persons going down supporting Social Security for example: use to be 10 to 1, went down to 6 to 1, now we’re at 3 to 1 and the Government that made laws, is discovering very quickly the way they have bit off their tail to spite their own head. It is interesting debate for sure, but clearly the Laws of Nature will not be governed by The Feds.

One only need to study a ‘Law of Nature’ in a little more detail to find that Gods Laws are for our good, and we often find out sooner or later that we weren’t too smart in comparing polygamy to slavery.

Anyway, what did we expect, some grand reward for stiffing God in the face? It’s another quadric to see the majority of pro-lifers vehemently opposed to polygamy, as if God is not counting the one’s they are prohibiting from coming down in their idea of his grace denying some soul that ability. It’s a truly confused world I tell ya, and I don’t have all the answers, just here like you trying to figure some things out.

Utah celebrates Pioneer Day July 24th as a celebration of the first wagon trains entering Utah. The struggle for water and to plant gardens were immediate first task upon entering the valley, and that tradition continues all over Utah, as a industrious people, it’s almost hard to go into any neighborhood and not see someone out in some garden, of course I have mine also and prepared a little video for the Celebration of out Utah Pioneer Day.


If your more interested in Utah history check out the wiki page here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Utah


Wednesday, June 9, 2010

Amicus Curiae in Defence of Lt.Col. Lakin


Cody Robert Judy
No. West
UT. 84
(801)497-
_____________________________________________________________________________
IN THE HONORABLE MILITARY COURT


U.S. ARMY (Plaintiff)
v. Amicus Curiae under UCMJ
LAKIN (Defendant)
Cody Robert Judy- Amicus Curiae LTC Driscoll
______________________________________________________________________________
daniel.driscoll@amedd.army.mil
cc: www.personalinjuryattorneylaw.com info@jensenlawyers.com att: Jenson & Associates- c/o Attorney Paul Rolf Jensen

Re: Amicus Curiae on behalf of the defendant Lakin

Amicus Curiae Concern for Defendant in the matter of U.S. Army v. Lakin in the matter wherein Lakin was charged:

"With one specification of a violation of Article 87, Missing Movement and four specifications of a violation of Article 92 (three specifications of Failure to Obey a Lawful Order, and one Specification of Dereliction of Duty)," said Chuck Dasey, spokesman at Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington, where Lakin is assigned.

*Motion to file leave of Amicus Curiae is respectfully submitted if applicable in UCMJ
______________________________________

Reasons why the Amicus Curiae from Cody Robert Judy is applicable to this Court:
______________________________________


• Cody Robert Judy was a candidate in the 2008 elections for President of the United States, who has filed litigation in two Federal Courts regarding the qualifications of Sen. John McCain, and Sen. Barack Hussein Obama who now occupies the White House. Here are the following Internet Link in support:
http://www.codyjudy.us/crj4ussenatorut_031.htm Judy vs. McCain
http://www.scribd.com/doc/22288917/Judy-v-Obama Judy vs. Obama

Cody Robert Judy also recently testified in the CIA Columbia Obama Trial as an injured presidential candidate, who by being in the same Presidential race as Obama has standing, and who swore to tell the truth at the trial where a 10 Amendment Court was held, a Jury selected, Defendant’s were served and given the chance to defend themselves, 6 days of trial witnesses and evidence were produced, and the Jury rendered a guilty verdict on 17 accounts ranging from fraud to sedition on Barack Hussein Obama, Michael Sovern, and Columbia University. The closing arguments are here:

http://atlah.org/atlahworldwide/?p=8342
http://www.sonorannews.com/archives/2010/100519/ftpgObamaTrial.html (News)
http://codyjudy.blogspot.com/2010/05/12-cia-columbia-jury-are-chosen-and-13.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dBJihJBePcs 31 sec. video witness Michelle Obama

The Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 32 Investigation, paragraph 1, reads:

(a) No charge or specification may be referred to a general court-martial for trial until a through and impartial investigation of all the matters set forth therein has been made. This investigation shall include inquiry as to the truth of the matter set forth in the charges, consideration of the form of charges, and recommendation as to the disposition which should be made of the case in the interest of justice and discipline.

a. While the Federal Courts have an interest in procuring justice in the matter, the technicalities of those courts and whatever rulings have or have not transpired do not apply to facts and information relevant to this matter. So it is that this court may also consider whatever evidence it seems true and faithful to the U.S.C.

(b) Your statement in paragraph 6 making a unilateral ruling on the role Congress may or may not play in any eligibility determination is incorrect. Obama has been sued prior to his (presumably) legally becoming President since he had never shown himself to be legally eligible to hold that office and in fact lied on his Declaration of Candidacy. Your pretense that somehow Congress could impeach a person ineligible to hold office actually is contrary to what would happen in the matter of an ineligible person who was sitting in the presidential seat of authority as a usurper.

(c) The Frame Work necessary to straighten the executive branch should be recognized by this court as a matter of jurisprudence, and if there exist evidence that would release the charges by statutes of compliance towards duty, that should be considered equitably. If there is one advantage of a military court, it is that of examining evidence and testimony minus the political fever at large. Now I challenge this court to hear my testimony, and to examine the evidence herein as a matter of defense for Lt. Col. Lakin as I do have direct standing in the matter which surrounds the issues with which he is so charged with, and I offer myself as witness for his behalf feeling it would be beyond my ability to withhold my testimony as a natural born citizen of the United States who has standing in the 2008 Presidential Election, in the defense of the same military which is sworn to protect me and uphold the United States Constitution.

(d) The Frame Work of the CIA Columbia Obama Trial held in Harlem, NY May 14-19th 2010, brought a comprehensive and collection of evidence never before packaged in such a way at great cost and sacrifice and should be presented for Senate/House Congressional Trial to Judicial Committee by a coalition of presenters, and to this Military Court. Men of courage such as Maj. Gen Paul E Valley (retired): citing the Constitutional Authority as such:

a. U.S.C. Art. I, Sect 8, Clause 10 the Congress shall have power “to define and punish Offenses against the Law of Nations;” for “Natural Born Citizen” requirement subject to Art.II Sect. 1, Clause 5, in the directive of Clause 6 [In case of the Removal of the President from Office – due to –inability to discharge the Powers and Duties of the said Office] Obama can’t be impeached as he was never qualified to be President.

(e) Today in this article http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=164409 your Honorable Sir, Major General Paul E Valley stated: "We now must call for the immediate resignation of Barry Soetero (AKA President Barack Hussein Obama) … based on incompetence, deceit, fraud, corruption, dishonesty and violation of the U.S. oath of office and the Constitution," he said in remarks delivered to a Lincoln Reagan dinner in Virginia City, Mont., last week and published today on the Stand Up America website. "And a call for a national petition for new elections to select the next president of the United States of America must be initiated," he continued. "We can wait no longer for a traditional change of power and new government."

I, Cody Robert Judy, do affirm that I have submitted this testimony and evidence under no obligation or threat of harm, and do so with my own volition and with the utmost integrity to relate the facts where upon I am so relevant in the matter, and upon necessary means am willing to come to this court and so testify to the courts satisfaction under cross examination and oath.

I further say not.

Cody Robert Judy /s/ affixed this 9th day of June,2010. Wensday 8:16pm

Witness in CIA Columbia Obama Trial- as an injured 2008 Presidential Candidate
http://www.codyjudy.blogspot.com