FATE OF NATION AND 141 MILLION DOLLARS REST IN HANDS OF CLERK

FATE OF NATION AND 141 MILLION DOLLARS REST IN HANDS OF CLERK
FEATURED EDITORIAL: The Post & Email

Who says being clerk is a lowly job of no particular importance? That is certainly not the case in the U.S. District Court in the State of Utah where the Chief Justice and Presiding Judge Honorable Ted Stewart just handed the Clerk of the Court the responsibility wherein the fate of the whole United States of America and $141 Million Dollars waits with anticipation on the clerks ruling on a "Default Certificate".

Before submitting the Motion for Default and the Proposed Order I called the Clerk stating a Certificate of Default was necessary to which I was told by the Clerk that it was up to the Judge so I made a Motion for Default and an Order up and sent them in. Now I have an Order from the Judge saying that its up to the Clerk.

Its odd working in the same building with multiple Clerks working tirelessly from 8AM to 4PM Monday through Friday for the Judge himself, and other Clerks working in the receiving room that someone didn't mention something at lunch like "oh yea, did you get the Judy v. Obama Certificate of Default up to Chief Judge Ted Stewart? You know the Defendants were served and didn't respond to the Courts Stamped Summons, and its long past the 20 Days that the Court requested an answer or Default by Judgement would be taken against them."

Well its probably because of the work load! I mean who can keep track of these things, thousands or at least hundreds of cases being filed right? What? What was that, this case is number 93? You mean its September and they haven't had 100 cases filed this year yet? Let's see here, between 14 Judges that's 6.6 lets round that up and say 7 cases per Judge and its the end of the 8th month so, a little less than 1 case per month per Judge.

That is understandably a mystery. I'm sorry, perhaps I am being a tiny bit facetious, but that's how I felt when I read that the Chief Justice was going to "leave the determination to the Clerk of the Court in the first instance.", when he could have made a phone call and got the report from the clerk in 5 minutes.

I actually don't believe the Judge didn't make that phone call, or that his personal Clerk didn't say Hi to the Clerks down stairs or some how didn't talk about it at lunch, on their break, or in passing each other in the halls. That just seems like an impossibility to me especially with those kind of names on the case.


So anyway, today I received from the Presiding Judge Ted Stewart of the United States District Court ((Utah Division)) a August 26th signed MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER OF JUDGEMENT on the Motion For Default and Proposed Order that I submitted to him. If you haven't read the Motion for Default or the Order you can do that here and I'd recommend that you do and after we can discuss a little bit of what we can determine based on what we have so far. That's the really fun part of all of this you political and legal crack junkies you. (smile) Hey if you can't have any fun with this or maintain a sense of humor, you really are in danger of losing it all. We can talk some serious things, and we can laugh and crack a joke or two at the same time.

Update on Judy v. Obama 1:14-cv-93 filed in the U.S. Court (District of Utah)
1. MOTION FOR DEFAULT W PROPOSED ORDER OF JUDGEMENT

2. ORDER OF DEFAULT JUDGEMENT (PROPOSED)


For anyone wishing to read the U.S. Federal Civil Rights Complaint you may now do so here now as it is public information: Judy v. Obama 2014 U.S. FED Case No. 1:14cv00093


Now that you've read it thoroughly and have some idea of what we are talking about, especially the MOTION FOR DEFAULT, you can understand Judge Ted Stewarts first paragraph in the Memorandum Decision.

"This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Default Order of Judgement.(reference No. 6 docket) In his Motion, Plaintiff asserts that Defendants have been properly served and have failed to appear or otherwise defend within the time allotted by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. On this basis, Plaintiff seeks a default judgement that includes an award of $141 million in damages."

Can't you just see the Judge looking at his Clerk and very slowly saying, "one hundred forty one million dollars- That's a lot of cash to dismiss in an Motion to Dismiss Default Judgement if it was granted. Whew!"

Before I get to far in to this report, let me just clarify a few basics just in case a few of you decided you didn't want to read the Complaint, the Motion For Default and the Proposed Order. This case actually does something unprecedented in political history! You have probably never thought that a political contribution was an investment that could actually increase in your whole life.

Can't you just see all the contributors of former Gov. Mitt Romney, Sen. John McCain,Sen. Hillary Clinton's and former Senator Barack Obama's 2012 presidential campaign scratching their heads right now trying to even comprehend how a political contribution could increase let say a hundred fold. That's where a $25 dollar contribution is refunded as $2500 because the contribution was given with a certain expectation of the 'rules of the race' and having the rules changed and not being notified of the change before the race started actually caused an inconvenience that needed to be reimbursed because of basically fraudulent circumstances?

Well, that's what I've actually proposed in this law suit that I would do to with every person that actually contributed to my campaign because we didn't know the the "natural born Citizen" qualification had been canceled in the U.S. Constitution by Republicans and Democrats presidential candidates in U.S. Senate Res. 511 where Sen. Hillary Clinton, Sen. Barack Obama and Sen. John McCain all made a deal that it would be changed and every U.S. Senator not apart of that voted for it.

Of course I wasn't there and neither was America or the 300 million Citizens of the U.S. to see the change that a non-binding U.S. Senate resolution had on an Article II of the Constitution that defines the rules and qualifications of the race for President so we just need to get our money back and some damages for not informing us that the U.S. Constitution had been changed, because if we had known it was changed we certainly wouldn't have run the races or contributed our hard earned money.

Can you imagine Mitt Romney doing that? Telling all of his contributors, "Hey you guys deserve a refund and some damages because the rules got changed and I wasn't in on it"? Well, that's kind of what I've said and I think its fair especially when we have a standard and there are rules. So we basically, just get a refund and Obama stays in the Office of the President. Of course that is unless Congress catches wind that a refund has been given to all the contributors based on a breach of the Constitution. Then of course, Congress is free to act as they will given the circumstances.

Those contributing to my campaign I'm sure will be very happy about their refund coming, while there probably will be a few people who contributed to rich Mitt Romney who are still less then satisfied. Oh, so it goes. I mean you certainly get a choice at who your going to support. Can you imagine the disappointment of those who gave to all four McCain, Romney twice, Hillary Clinton, and Obama? They will probably be really disappointed. That's like betting on every horse on the race except the one that won or did some good for you! (hahaha)Who says you have to win the race in order to win on principle? Who says 'principle doesn't pay off?'

Okay, back to the Judge's second paragraph-
"Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a) provides that "[w]hen a party against whom a judgement for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise defend, and that failure is shown by affidavit or otherwise, the clerk must enter the party's default." Then, "[i]f the plaintiff's claim is for a sum certain... the clerk- on Plaintiff's request, with an affidavit showing the amount due-must enter judgement for that amount and cost against a defendant who has been defaulted." (reference Fed R. Civ.P 55 (b)(1). However, where, as here, the judgement sought is not for a sum certain, or for a sum that can be made certain, "the party must apply to the court for a default judgement." (reference 3 Id. 55(b)(2)."

That's kind of a mouthful, but I guess what it means is I need to submit an Affidavit to the Clerk, even though a signed Motion and an Order in my mind is kind of the same thing- an affidavit is sworn to and has a specific amount.

Third Paragraph-
"Plaintiff has applied to the Court for a default judgement. However, Plaintiff has not yet received a default certificate as required by Rule 55 (a). Until Plaintiff receives a default certificate from the Clerk of Court, the Court cannot reach the merits of Plaintiff's Motion for Default Order of Judgement. For this reason, the Court will deny Plaintiff's Motion without prejudice. In so doing, the Court does not reach the merits of Plaintiff's claim of proper service or entitlement to a default certificate. Rather, it will leave that determination to the Clerk of Court in the first instance."
Fourth Paragraph-
"Based on the foregoing, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Default Order of Judgement (Docket No.6) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. DATED this 26th day of August, 2014. (Signed by) U.S. District Judge Ted Stewart"

You know I have to say I think that was very nice of Judge Ted Stewart, I really do. You know when I opened the envelope up I thought here we go, another "DISMISSAL in your face you don't know what the word frivolous means do you? YOU MUST BE STUPID STUPID STUPID", type of an ORDER. I don't feel that way at all with this Order. I think it was very concise and I didn't feel STUPID STUPID STUPID, even though and I'm sure he knows, I could easily qualify for that kind of insult legally speaking with years of inexperience rather then the years of experience he has.

You know I'm never offended with intelligence and quality and I've got a pretty good eye at recognizing quality. Yes, even in my ex-wifes. I sure didn't marry them because they weren't quality women. I never thought to myself, " I wonder why I married her?". I knew why I did, and never regretted it with all three.

So now let's briefly discuss what Judge Stewart didn't do, that he actually could have. If for instance he had DISMISSED the Motion with PREJUDICE or DISMISSED THE COMPLAINT as frivolous that would be the end..good night..turn off the lights. You don't bother the Courts again with this. That's it. He did'nt do that and I love him because he didn't do that and he could have.

There is nothing that means more to my heart then 'good judgement'. Its for me like admiring a supreme performance by a reining horse that spins like a top and slides 60 feet on a lose reign with just a few cues from the rider. That to someone else might be like admiring a really rare piece of art and understanding the artist, the history, and value of a favorite collection, or how about a mother who tries to explain the beauty of her sleeping child as her heart swells with joy this child brings her?

I know it sounds strange, but losing a race the best that you can is every bit as important as winning with your best effort. If you give it all you got and lose, its okay to walk away. When I think about all the "likes" I've got on facebook from the general public people who don't even know me, and their sharing what I've written I am so humbled and filled with gratitude. Its just amazing. When ever I've received a contribution in the mail or on line from my web site I've remembered to thank God for that and treated it just as honorably as the widow's mite Jesus pointed out was so valuable.

Well, that's all the news I have to report today for those you following this case and interested in it. Thanks for sharing and caring.., You really do mean the world to me and I thank you.

If you'd like to contribute to the ABC Campaign (American Birther Campaign)for Cody Robert Judy U.S. President 2016 you can do so on the contribution page of www.codyjudy.us

Sincerely
Cody Robert Judy

Wow!Just found my book, Taking A Stand, on sale at your local B&N for nook users if you prefer over soft or hard bound - only $8.49 That's a Great price

Cody Robert Judy
For U.S. President 2016

If you think “Truth” is worth it, support it and quit supporting the lie. That is the beginning of change, or we can just keep on going down this road and see where it leads with Obama. Which is it going to be?

TRUTH IS REAL

The Commercial is simply called "America"

Is Mitt a Hit or a Misfit?

Is Mitt a Hit or a Misfit for the Office of the President?

The speculation that Mitt Romney may or may not 'run' for President is once again blasting ears of the American Public like a reverb button that has been turned up high and continues to echo in your head. On the Democratic Party side we are blasted in the news with Sen. Hillary Clinton's mojo, as if her giving up against Obama in the Democratic Party nomination was a reward for receiving the nomination in 2016.

Is there a hit in Mitt and Hillary yet or do we have old school songs that have been remixed one to many times already? Don't get me wrong, I love Tanya Tucker singing Delta Dawn, but I keep wondering if America still hasn't heard the notes that were not quite in tune when it comes to the actual job requirement of the President in defending, protecting, and preserving the United States Constitution?

If you recall Mitt Romney ran for President in 2008 losing the Republican nomination to Sen. John McCain. He re-rallied the forces for another ride in 2012 this time hurdling the Republican Nomination he'd tripped over in 2008 only to experience a melt down with Barack Obama in the 2012 showdown general election.

What Mitt failed to do in his campaigns of 2008 and 2012 was actually defend the United States Constitution from an unqualified candidate. Both McCain and Obama were not 'Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents' as is defined in the term 'natural born Citizen', the requirement for the Office of the President in the United States Constitution. Excluding foreign influence in both nature and nurture the Office of the President is unique in its requirement from U.S. Representatives and U.S. Senators and a foreign influence can permeate that office either by a foreign birth or a foreign or alien parent.

While being born outside the United States or being born to an alien parent does not make your skin blue, it does create a certain allegiance that persons "born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents" are not subjects to in a legal arena as far as being granted a foreign citizenship that might create a dual citizenship prohibited in the Office of the President. The question is not is the alien citizenship employed, but rather does the alien citizenship exist? If it does, that is prohibited from the Office of the President in the United States of America.

Its not a matter of 'discrimination' its a matter of 'qualification', much the same as the age restrictions also noted are different from U.S. Reps, U.S. Sen., and U.S. Presidents, or for that matter the age restrictions on driving a car, or buying alcohol exist. Allowing infants to drive your car, or juveniles to buy your alcohol is illegal and is not lawful, yet the voting public has over the last two presidential cycles not had any candidates in the major parties that have agreed with the law.

If you like the idea of 'infants on thrones' you need to understand there is a difference between someone who is of wise judgement and that being seen as good or innocent like an infant, and the negative contraction of the idea existing stating, those who are not qualified or fail to qualify should not be allowed in the Office for good reasons much the same as we don't allow people who are 7 to drive or those who are 14 to buy alcohol because your just asking for an accident to happen.

Like former Gov. Mitt Romney failed to challenge Sen. John McCain in his 'qualification failure for not being born in the U.S. but receiving his native born citizenship from Panama and generally populating the idea that McCain had not one but two Congressional Acts on his Citizenship generally formed under the 14th Amendment or non-binding U.S. Senate Resolution 511, Hillary Clinton failed to do the same thing on Barack Obama. In her democratic party campaign she failed a most basic objection to his candidacy for the nomination in 2012 which ultimately could have prohibited any further crisis and given her the nomination. This is why I say she 'gave up' against Barack Obama in her campaign and failed to do the most basic duty of a President in objecting to an unqualified candidate in the race.

Mitt Romney went on to repeat Hillary Clinton's failure, and thus suffered the same defeat.

The premise is very basic but reveals or uncovers quite a bit,If you can't at the very least stand up and defend, preserve, and protect the U.S. Constitution while your in the race for President by objecting to unqualified candidates in affect threatening the office of the President unlawfully, how are you going to do it if you were elected? Why should someone be rewarded with the Office of the President who neglects the most basic task from the very beginning?

Now through out this stage of experimentation with our Republic, that's the Republic for which we stand, for those who have forgotten the Pledge of Allegiance, neither Mitt Romney or Hillary Clinton have changed their tune about Barack Obama who is not a qualified individual in the Office of the President. One of the very basic tenants of a Republic is that elections don't over-ride the Constitution but are suppose to co-inside with the Constitution.

What that means is that it does not matter how many people voted for Barack Obama without being educated that he was not a natural born Citizen, what matters is the Constitution and one person standing up and saying so. One person can stand against every one that voted for Barack Obama. In a Constitution Republic, if that one person is right by the Constitution, all those votes really do not count because they were cast under a veil of fraud, deceit, and cover-up of an identity.

The way I see it as the only U.S. Presidential Candidate who actually as a matter of record in Court objected to both McCain and Obama's qualification for the Office of the President all the way through the election cycles of 2008 and 2012, is if the tune hasn't changed, its probably the same old song. I've been waiting for an objection cast from the lips of both Mitt Romney and Hillary Clinton, but so far all I hear is silence. There is no music being played that would turn me on. In fact I actually see a confirmation that indeed their tune hasn't changed.


Recently Mitt Romney said, "I mean, you hope you learn from your mistakes," he said, "but at the same time, there are people who are not yet known by the American public who have extraordinary records, great capability, Paul Ryan being one of them, Scott Walker, Bobby Jindal, Marco Rubio. Of course, people are getting to know Chris Christie. Jeb Bush, they don’t know Jeb Bush as the governor of Florida, and the kind of record he has and had there. These are people who I think have the potential to really ignite interest in our party and potentially win the general."

http://www.businessinsider.com/mitt-romney-2016-president-hugh-hewitt

No offense Mitt, but even some of your recommendations as far as 'good people' for the Office of the President would be walking talking violations of the U.S. Constitution if they were to win the Office of the President. I can not recommend 16 year olds buying alcohol and say that it is good. It has nothing to do with Marco Rubio or Bobby Jindal not being good fathers or parents or a good U.S. Senator or Governor it has to do with the qualifications the American People have set up for the Office of the President that both Marco Rubio and Bobby Jindal fail.

Now I don't think Mitt Romney is a bad guy or Hillary Clinton is a bad gal nor do I think Barack Obama is a bad guy. There are many good qualities about Romney, Clinton, and Obama as well as McCain, Rubio, Jindal, Cruz,as well as Santorum all of whom I even recently challenged in the ALS Ice bucket challenge, only because I knew Mitt had already done it and challenged his wife also, but we have to start facing facts.

If all of these people recommend that 16 year olds can buy alcohol and 7 year olds can drive, maybe their advice is somewhat of a misfit and not something we want in the Office of the President? They are all free every day to accept a challenge and begin fresh and I for one sincerely hope they do, because nothing would be better to me than if I could have someone to vote for who was legal besides myself.

Will Mitt Romney take another run who knows? What I do know is that the tune hasn't changed. I've written some 60+ songs and many of them I actually dreamed about. You can imagine my surprise when I leaped out of bed with this tune being chanted in my head during my sleep by not just me but many many people. It sounded pretty good as a chorus of many people, not as good with just me, but look at the date on this thing and then ask yourself is Mitt Romney running again as a hit or a misfit?

I just checked this link and its only been seen 11 times! You know how hard that is to do with a video published June 20th,2013, over a year ago? ( smile ) Maybe the 'reverbs' a little to high? Let's hope they all change their tune!

Mitt Romney's Loop te Loop





Update on Judy v. Obama 1:14-cv-93 filed in the U.S. Court (District of Utah)
1. MOTION FOR DEFAULT W PROPOSED ORDER OF JUDGEMENT

2. ORDER OF DEFAULT JUDGEMENT (PROPOSED)


Those wishing to read the U.S. Federal Civil Rights Complaint may now do so here now as it is public information: Judy v. Obama 2014 U.S. FED Case No. 1:14cv00093


Wow!Just found my book, Taking A Stand, on sale at your local B&N for nook users if you prefer over soft or hard bound - only $8.49 That's a Great price

Cody Robert Judy
For U.S. President 2016

If you think “Truth” is worth it, support it and quit supporting the lie. That is the beginning of change, or we can just keep on going down this road and see where it leads with Obama. Which is it going to be?

TRUTH IS REAL

The Commercial is simply called "America"

ALS Icebucketchallenge - CRJ accepts and Challenges Who?

The ALS Icebucket Challenge is accepted and you just have to watch the video to see who Cody Robert Judy Candidate for President Challenges next!




Will you now join 221others across the country representing every state in the nation of informed patriots who have liked my Facebook page for President? Cody Robert Judy for President 2016 Thank you for your consideration.
https://m.facebook.com/CodyRobertJudyForPresident2016


Update on Judy v. Obama 1:14-cv-93 filed in the U.S. Court (District of Utah)
1. MOTION FOR DEFAULT W PROPOSED ORDER OF JUDGEMENT

2. ORDER OF DEFAULT JUDGEMENT (PROPOSED)


Those wishing to read the U.S. Federal Civil Rights Complaint may now do so here now as it is public information: Judy v. Obama 2014 U.S. FED Case No. 1:14cv00093


Wow!Just found my book, Taking A Stand, on sale at your local B&N for nook users if you prefer over soft or hard bound - only $8.49 That's a Great price

Cody Robert Judy
For U.S. President 2016

If you think “Truth” is worth it, support it and quit supporting the lie. That is the beginning of change, or we can just keep on going down this road and see where it leads with Obama. Which is it going to be?

TRUTH IS REAL

The Commercial is simply called "America"

My Music My Heart

MY MUSIC MY HEART


If every single person had to write a song that reflected their personal life, what would that song be and what would it sound like? Would it be a "Happy-Go-Lucky" song, would it be a "Love or Romance Ballad", would it be a "Tragic Melancholy", would it be a Violent, Angry, or Frustrated Headbanger? Truth is, everyone of us has a few songs on each subject we could write.

Maybe you are not putting 'notes' and 'rest' and 'rhythm's' to your song because you don't know the first thing about writing music and only know how to listen to it. That's great, but you are still writing a song about your life. We all are. Maybe it doesn't come through to your ears, maybe you are a painter or an artist of a different understanding; words,stories, experiences all become a part of your song, but make no mistake about it, you are an artist.

The words in a document like the United States Constitution are a song, as are the fittings of a plumber, the casing of a carpenter, or the engine of a car all contributing to our collective song. Mine is unique as is yours, we are not the same people. We are individuals.

Do you remember the movie "WALK THE LINE" starring Joaquin Phoenix, Reese Witherspoon, Ginnifer Goodwin, and Robert Patrick? I always remember in that movie when Johnny Cash played by Joaquin got his first try out. He and his band went and played an old gospel song. The Studio Producer said and I'm paraphrasing here, 'Well, I've heard enough you guys got anything better than that? We've all heard that song played that way a hundred times. If you were about to die, is that the song you would choose to play, or would you play something different?" You can see a little reminder of that scene here at about 29 seconds. Of course in the movie Johnny Cash plays a song he had written while in the army "Folsom Prison Blues".

The point here as I reflect is we all are indeed writing a song with our lives and while we are all unique in our songs, we all sure can relate to each other and the problems we all have that are similar but different. Sometimes the success of a song really depends on how well other people can relate and incorporate the words of the song in their own life.

Many of you know me more for standing up for the Constitution's Principles, especially the natural born Citizen clause required in the Office of the President that I filed in Court as a matter of record in 2008 and 2012 and now 2014 in Judy v. McCain and Judy v. Obama. The principles in our Constitution are important and using them as a guideline and direction really has kept us out of a lot of trouble.

Of course when they are violated the consequences are seen also and we pay for them in much the same way as you would buy something that was very expensive. Mistakes in our lives are costly. Of course we all hope we can learn from our mistakes and do better, but when we don't learn from our mistakes often they are repeated in our life and that can be said of a whole country also.

American exceptionalism is a strongly debated topic. Many say America is not really number one at anything when you start looking at the numbers and manipulating them. Defense and protection is very important when you have a tyrant at your door wanting to dictate terms on your life. That is where our Constitution becomes real as a set of guidelines for the liberties and freedoms we have agreed upon as law.

Of course some lawyers and elected leaders might say 'law' is really only what is actually enforced. Meaning for instance when you have an unqualified person in the Office of the President, he stays there unless the law is enforced that says we require as a qualification a natural born Citizen, "Born in the U.S. to Citizen parents" which of course is the sensible application of the law to avoid a foreign influence at the head of our armies and military.

When Congress debated this in 2000 the testimonies were really interesting and reflected that something amazing happens in a second generation American that does not necessarily happen or is not necessarily felt through the veins and heart of a person as a first generation American that is poignant or pervasive so the qualification has not changed even though it has been considered fairly recently in our own history. Most Americans probably have no idea what was said in those hearings and chalk it up to 'trusting their Representatives' with a comment like, "That's their job- That's what we vote for them to do".

Elected positions are not really so much about popularity contest as they are a 'trust' to do a job, much the same as if you asked your son to go to the store and buy a gallon of milk and hoped and trusted he would come home with milk rather than a bag full of candy. It seems simple enough, but often it becomes a regrettable circumstance and our elected leaders come home with a bag of candy to rot our teeth out instead of some milk to fortify our calcium intake that will strengthen our bones.

Well, my point here in this blog piece was really to say that standing up for the Constitution for me is as important as my music and both are reflections of my own heart. I can't see laying either of them down because they are both apart of me.

I don't write my songs because I think they will be big hits. I really don't. I write them because that's what I have coming through me. I don't take a stand for the Constitution or run for political office because I think it would be cool to have my picture taken with other foreign heads of state. I take a stand for the Constitution and run for political office because I understand how important those principles are for the people in our Country and a Country is really defined by the people, otherwise the value is maintained by the animals.

As soon as we lose appreciation for the principles of our Country's Constitution we really become an oppression upon our Country seen as something worse than the animals for at the very least they aren't oppressing nature but are abiding within nature's laws. I know that's kind of heavy, but there are truths that can be recognized with in it if one has a mind to look for them.

One song doesn't define me, I've written over 60 songs. Trying to pin me down to one song is certainly denying the other 59 in so many words. You can do it, but it doesn't hold all that much water. I'm certainly more than one single song and I'm more then one day in my life or one period in my life.

I do feel quite misunderstood often about much in my life and I've done quite a bit to try and open the box that many people would try to cage me in and label me as so as to do my part in helping people understand me. There are many who try very hard to keep me in their little box. They spend quite a considerable amount of time seeing to it I'm kept where they think I belong.

As I reflect on this 'effort of theirs', I have to ask myself why? Why do they do it? The answer comes back with the definition of 'fear'. They are afraid of their own reflections if it is discovered they are oppressors or in other words, trying to maintain me in their definition and little box. This is the action of a 'cover-up'. I do not try to cover them up, I'm not anxiously engaged in suppressing their music, or suppressing their 'likes' or 'hits'. I'm not even in the position to entertain doing that,but they are.

I am well aware of this effort of 'cover-up' and 'containment'. It happens on the Internet. There are interest, some might call them 'special interest' because they are a reflection of individuals who have planted the seed, nurtured it, and seen to it that it has grown. There efforts are not valiant, honorable, or beautiful by any stretch of the imagination or definition of the words. They are corrosive, corrupt, and disingenuous in nature. They do not reflect any appreciation, but reflect instead bitterness, fear, and contempt.

Its not my job to change them. That is their own song and I shall not hinder them from making their own song. My job is to give to you my songs and give to you my heart., for that is what I have to give, and for that I am grateful to be able to give you something. Yes, there might be quite a few things wrong with it and it might not be satisfactory to you because of this imperfection or that imperfection, and your certainly able to trash it.

What I am thrilled about is that there are people who love it and appreciate it. I want to say thank you to them and this message is to them for sharing, caring, and loving me. I love you for that reflection and I hope to reflect that love you've given me back to you. Its a lovely process. (smile) Its not that I can't improve either, or that I haven't improved from days gone by. Day by Day, here a little there a little, I don't think there is any one of us who wakes up one morning and things my goal is "not to improve" is there?

Even in our tragedies, sadness,and bitterness we are seeking improvement. With that I want to thank you for all you have done for me. Each and every one of you, critics and collaborators alike. I don't believe you would criticize without caring in some ways for me. I recognize this. My own mother is my worst critic and justifies it based on her freedom to do so. I do not think she does not love me. My own father, God rested his weary body also was a great critic of me falling on my face. If I can take the harsh criticism from my own mother and father, I can surely take yours with some ease.

As we look upon our lives as vehicles often times driving a sports car is not practical on a bad snowy day where an SUV is so much nicer, but we all recognize a sports car is in many places pretty cool and fun. Every star in Hollywood has bad snowy days when they wish they were home driving the SUV before they turned into the sports car. Maybe that's were shape-shifting is a good thing and those who can do it and don't depend on just one certain vehicle are better off in life's changing roads and climates?

I've never depended upon being elected, neither have I depended upon my songs making a living for me. I am more than being elected, or being a one hit wonder and so are you. I want you to believe that and trust it because its the truth.

With that I want to thank everyone who through invitation, came to the private debut of my new single, 'I'M FEELING A NEW LOVE'. It was wonderful! I cherished each and everyone's compliments and have tucked them away in my heart to treasure the rest of my life very sincerely. You came, you listened, and you valued the gift of my heart to you. That means the world to me and is a buffer for being burned, quartered, and trashed. (smile)

You my friends are a joy to me and enrich my life. I could only hope to be some small smile in your lives and hearts.
With that I present to everyone "I'M FEELING A NEW LOVE" and hope you also will enjoy it as just a song, just one little song, nothing more.





Will you now join 221others across the country representing every state in the nation of informed patriots who have liked my Facebook page for President? Cody Robert Judy for President 2016 Thank you for your consideration.
https://m.facebook.com/CodyRobertJudyForPresident2016


Update on Judy v. Obama 1:14-cv-93 filed in the U.S. Court (District of Utah)
1. MOTION FOR DEFAULT W PROPOSED ORDER OF JUDGEMENT

2. ORDER OF DEFAULT JUDGEMENT (PROPOSED)


Those wishing to read the U.S. Federal Civil Rights Complaint may now do so here now as it is public information: Judy v. Obama 2014 U.S. FED Case No. 1:14cv00093


Wow!Just found my book, Taking A Stand, on sale at your local B&N for nook users if you prefer over soft or hard bound - only $8.49 That's a Great price

Cody Robert Judy
For U.S. President 2016

If you think “Truth” is worth it, support it and quit supporting the lie. That is the beginning of change, or we can just keep on going down this road and see where it leads with Obama. Which is it going to be?

TRUTH IS REAL

The Commercial is simply called "America"

The Presidential Porn Sting and The Ring of Fire

The Presidential Porn Sting and The Ring of Fire


The solicitation of scantily clad and nude women was something I’d seen before and there are plenty of citizens out there trying to make ends meet involved in that kind of solicitation for a living. I for one understand that. One thing I didn’t expect was to be reporting to the public that it was a favored tool of what I will call a Presidential Porn Sting against me as a presidential candidate. Believe me when I say this is a worm hole and those involved are as low as worms can go.

One of the most powerful tools against Conservatives and shall we say in general middle America is indeed a collusion of exploitation upon a necessary body within the politic. On one hand the Constitution has within it a very revered principle to conservatives and liberals alike we know as ‘free speech’ and ‘free press’. On the other hand traditional conservative people who love the Constitution would most likely turn away from someone running for office exposed as a regular solicitor of pornography, and therein lays a big problem.

Somewhere in the middle ground of ‘free speech’ and conservatives ‘moral principle’ regarding porno a breached and divide can be wedged quite easily as a tool in a left wing sting with the use of unsavory propaganda upon the public to favor themselves in the political arena in a divide and conquer strategy.
Exposing this strategy at the root of maniacal manipulation is I believe something worth exploring and reporting in an effort of exposing in a fair and transparent way to the public the lengths of which opposition is willing to descend to in a power tussle of an election. I believe this is one of Obama’s favorite tools and he understands if very well dating back to his first win as a U.S. Senator in Illinois when he went for the jugular of his opponent in reveling in divorce records.

The unseedy elements of this I have been subject to as a Presidential Candidate are probably only beginning. As a matter of transparency I must address my reality in the matter as I’ve traced solicitation of what can only be called ‘porn’ perpetrated upon my phone and computer under the cover of “ group conversation” text to my phone and computer that I have traced unbelievable back to military individuals associated with military groups of our Government.

What specifically happens is I will receive a message that includes a group of up to 40 individuals in what is called a ‘group conversation’ of a solicitation of porn. Then what happens is you will find the perpetrators of the conversation exiting the group conversation as quickly as it is sent. In other words this is not a group conversation for which the sender wants to be a part of; it’s a deliberate sting, frame job, or set up in what we’d call a traditional cover-up.
Now, someone sent those ‘group conversations’ can exit those groups but it’s not as easy as you might think it ought to be. It takes a pretty proficient knowledge about how social media works and all the ins and outs of your phone and the applications on the social media network to corral and exit yourself as a target. In the mix of that you can definitely be set up.

The excuse of not knowing how to do something while your operating a car is not always a good excuse but it is an excuse. Think about how many people don’t know how to change a flat tire on their car or actually could be charged with a ticket for an accident relative to any number of car fluids being low and causing the accident. There are probably a lot of people who don’t know the difference between their car washer fluid depository and their brake fluid or motor oil depository, but they can drive a vehicle just fine. This is what I’m alluding to. Just because you have an i-phone or a computer doesn’t mean you know how to program it, use it, or prevent others from using maliciously.

We could all ask Obama when he entered the white house as a non eligible or constitutionally unqualified person in the Office of the President why the secret service had to overhaul his blackberry phone and while we are asking, we could include how he surmised not being a natural born Citizen didn’t make him a bully voiding out the actual qualifications for the Office of the President? Most of us don’t have the benefit of the secret service watching out for us.

What I’ve learned to do, as I said I’ve seen a ton of those pornographic messages and what I usually will do is simply look to see if the first person exiting the group is the sender or perpetrator of the message. If it is, you can generally assume you’re being stung in a sting operation that someone who sent the group message or gathered the group of names together, and folded the message to as a trap or set up. It’s not enough I’ve found to simply exit the group conversation which I did a number of times and found I was still the subject to the group message another day because I was on the list.

Now all this can be explained away in a manner of speaking as a form of teen mischievousness or even a low end adult adventure trying to make an extra dollar or two and I would normally at first associate it with something like that. As a next step to it being somewhat bothersome, I begin “blocking” the person who I noticed was sending the message and exiting the group very quickly which I figured would block me from getting the messages as presumably I would block the person who had the list I was on from sending me the message.

Now to find that same list with someone else sending you the same message implies the person you blocked had friends or accomplices in the teen prank or adult adventure show. They are not acting alone. Let’s say you go through several friends blocking them in turn like you did the first with imaginative names that also have profiles that look pretty legitimate on a social network, so you assume they are real people. Imagine the shock when you find after a few blocks the same message linked to a profile of a military person associated with a military group in our Government. That connection is a little too close for comfort and you can probably assume with relative ease your being targeted by the Commander-In-Chief as the military order exclusively directs in a chain of command.

This is what’s happening to me as a Candidate for President in 2008, 2012, and 2016 as the only Presidential Candidate in America who in court record opposed John McCain and Barack Obama in 2008 and 2012 because presumably the ‘race card’ doesn’t work as well with me as it might with other politicians who oppose Barack Obama’s qualifications but maybe even perhaps a bit unwittingly gave McCain a pass setting themselves up as dominoes for the ‘race card’ Obama employs so easily.

Now when you find yourself in a sting operation maybe under even presumptuously good intentions relayed by those in seats of power like what we heard from A.G. Eric Holder about the good intentions of Operation Fast & Furious leading to deaths of an unfortunate border guard, or the good intentions of former SOS Hillary Clinton in Benghazi in testimonies to Congress related to the deaths of a few others subject to a sudden collapse of national security, being relayed in contempt of Congress literally or the shrill of contempt in a statement like “What difference does it make now”; you have to start asking the public to put two and two together and start discerning a line between those actually opposed to the Constitution who are saying they are for it, and those actually standing up for the Constitution subject to stings of those who are with their actions not standing up for it, but are saying they are.

That is a responsibility to you the voters and supporters of politicians who really can’t exist without your support and contributions. What would I have you do when confronted with nasty revelations?

Arm yourselves with truth. That is literally the best defense against false accusations remembering ‘beauty is in the eye of the beholder”. How can you take ‘porn’ out of the hands of your opponent’s arsenal as a weapon in the political arena? You ask people to support ‘free speech’, You understand your free speech is on an alter of sacrifice in your assault upon someone else’s right of free speech to burn the American Flag in a protest that makes your blood boil.
You understand your free speech is connected to the free speech associated with ‘pornography’ that makes you kind of sick to your stomach. How do you do that with something? You start looking for the kernels of truth in something that makes you sick to your stomach so there is at least something to hold fast to that prevents you from stomping on your own principle that you hold dear.

How could a church going guy or gal married and dedicated to serving the interest of their union find a kernel of truth in porn? By realizing their own acts of love together could be presumed as starring in a porn film in the site of God if God so chose to look upon them that way. We all have bodies and beauty in the body in an art form rather than a negative light is a perception. Seeing beauty in an art form takes the power out of an evil perception. That is a kernel of truth and what we are fighting against more than anything because if your eye is only upon evil what light has your body been filled with?

Dependents upon your presumption of evil is of course a tool in the political arena where standing for principles should over ride much of the rising tide of debauchery that can be or is employed in desperation and the lack of being able to stand on solid Constitutional Principles. If I had a prayer or a wish to God that’s what it would be. If we can change our perceptions to look at and for truths, well, then we will go places upward rather than dwelling with the worms beneath.

Religious hypocrisy has got to stop at the door of examination and a celebration of the truth, with the foundation of our Constitution as a guide to employ. That is not easy by any means, but it is worth it. You can understand how politicians, especially those who not single like myself, could be framed and really bullied with a porn sting, which would amount to a ring of fire upon their marriage or divorce for that matter. Sacrificing Constitutional Principles with the use of extortion upon the marriages of politicians is a weapon easily used and must be seen as the actions of a worm.

We as a public must start understanding much more as a collective that the benefits of America are our opportunities to employ our Constitutional Principles upon our politicians and that may very easily be in defense of someone who has been or is being framed.

There is another equally important guide we must all take in moderation and a balance and that has to do with 'police brutality' being taken and used as a tool to employ uprisings for the purposes of a justification for martial law and a crackdown on our 2nd Amendment Rights, rights to free speech, rights to peacefully assemble all under attack.

While in my own heart I feel it a tragedy anyone unarmed is shot down by police who somehow figured a net, peppermace,or a baton was not adequate force in a take down and instead made a decision of lethal force the revelation of six bullets in the body is certainly a reason for concern in Missouri. However looting, pillaging and robbing other people is not an answer or quick route for justice. In fact, if you wanted to consider those engaged in that behavior as acting as a significant force on behalf of martial law, or a justification somehow manipulated in an order to destroy the Constitution's 2nd Amendment you could very easily stay on that path and see it. Minorities have every reason to be concerned with being used this way and in actions they find justifiable really see themselves used as pawns in the tool to destroy individual rights of liberty.

WE as Citizens must be able to discern how and when an escalation of violence on behalf of an individual can be used as a tool of justification of and for a certain brutality upon the public with a significant emphasis on the principles of our Constitution. Are individual rights of people supported or slain in a communities uprising and protest?

If you can answer that individual rights are slain you can figure some force is really out to manipulate the security of the community. This is precisely the advocate I have maintained in the civil arguments in court advocating that having someone in the oval office who is not a natural born Citizen, (born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents) is very much in an extraordinary position of defamation of our Constitutional Character representing a national security threat.

As the State's National Guard is called out in on a symptom of the problem I cannot help but advocate to protesters that if you are going to protest "Police Brutality" and not make a mention of the "Presidential Brutality" upon the public amounting to the usurpation on the Office of the President, your protest is nothing more than a manifestation of hypocrisy towards the justice in truth you seek.

Excusing one form of brutality and justifying another amounts to a call for change from black people who by all means should be engaged in a preservation of their Constitution as Americans, every bit as important as everyone elses. I call upon them to consider their mistake in Barack Obama and consider the mounting evidence of the truth rather than the blatant actions of looting that saws upon the cross of Jesus Christ as a cross saw.

If police were armed with cameras and video recorders like i-phones rather than tier gas and bullets a speculation of justice in court rather than on the streets might be a much better weapon of choice. Rounding up thugs who loot on a predatory impulse as a ring of justice is captured by police watching might serve the community as a much better example that your not getting away with anything. We will find you with your actions caught on tape and visit you soon after you return to your home with the loot.


Regarding the protest of the police bullying in regards to shooting unarmed people here in Utah and across the Nation. I wonder if your familiar with what exactly is happening with the police force and who is behind militarization of the police?

This was Obama's plan from the beginning everyone. In this video you see police even firing at the media. Now, what's important about this? Well, people have not understood the importance of our Constitution's qualification for President, especially the Media. You object to being fired upon but conceal a cover-up of Presidential required qualifications and wonder what rights you have as a Media Reporter? Your trampling on your own rights..don't you see yourselves as you are seen?

Obama is not a natural born Citizen. When you protest police violence and condone violations of the Constitution your in fact at odds with yourself. I for one am fighting this fight taking Obama to court on these violations because these violations are mirrored images of the police brutality at its root. Bullying you're way into the White House is brutality upon a lot more of the public then a bully of a police force upon one individual, but you give excuse to Obama and condemn the police?

I just want you to remember out there today how important our Constitution is and in a true sense understand this brutality is often used to provoke unrest for justification of further crackdown on 2nd Amendment rights, free speech rights and free press rights.

Fighting for the Constitution is a fight against the government bullying/ not just one against police. I wonder sometimes why people will not support a peaceful legal battle in a court of law before they take to the streets in protest of a symptom of the problem rather than addressing the root of the problem. I would love your opinion after watching the 6 minute video and your consideration of support for my Candidacy for President with a new understanding of exactly what I'm taking a stand for and have been for 7 years now. https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=819860994705286

Will you now join 221others across the country representing every state in the nation of informed patriots who have liked my Facebook page for President? Cody Robert Judy for President 2016 Thank you for your consideration.
https://m.facebook.com/CodyRobertJudyForPresident2016


Update on Judy v. Obama 1:14-cv-93 filed in the U.S. Court (District of Utah)
1. MOTION FOR DEFAULT W PROPOSED ORDER OF JUDGEMENT

2. ORDER OF DEFAULT JUDGEMENT (PROPOSED)


Those wishing to read the U.S. Federal Civil Rights Complaint may now do so here now as it is public information: Judy v. Obama 2014 U.S. FED Case No. 1:14cv00093


Wow!Just found my book, Taking A Stand, on sale at your local B&N for nook users if you prefer over soft or hard bound - only $8.49 That's a Great price

Cody Robert Judy
For U.S. President 2016

If you think “Truth” is worth it, support it and quit supporting the lie. That is the beginning of change, or we can just keep on going down this road and see where it leads with Obama. Which is it going to be?

TRUTH IS REAL

The Commercial is simply called "America"

Breaking News:Default Document Update Judy v. Obama 2014- Ruling by Race or the Constitution?

Breaking News:Default Document Update Judy v. Obama 2014- Ruling By Race or the Constitution?


Obama shouted out, “That’s horsesh*t!” He was on the defensive from attacks by his own former Secretary Of State Hillary Clinton as she assuaged his actions in Syria lamenting 170,000 who were dead and parlayed it was Obama’s fault for not sending in training, arming, and otherwise supporting Syrian rebels opposed to Syria’s president Assad for using chemical weapons on his population. http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/08/11/exclusive-obama-told-lawmakers-criticism-of-his-syria-policy-is-horsesh-t.html

Police fired tear gas at rioter's and looters in Syria...oh.., wait a minute, it was in Ferguson, Missouri.

St. Lois QuickTrip,Walmart,Kmart,County Shoe Carnival,Foot Locker,PNC Bank,Hibbetts Sports,Beauty Supply and Wig Store,Family Dollar,Boost Mobile,DTLR,Taco Bell,Remy Beauty Supply,Cricket Wireless,Phillips 66,Energy Express,Pawn Shop,Target,JC Wireless,Firestone,Dollar General,Up N Up Fashion,Several Burglaries,T-Mobile,Second QuikTrip,Shoe Carnival in South St. Louis City we're all last night all by looters.

Tear gas, formally known as a lachrymatory agent or lachrymator (from lacrima meaning "tear" in Latin), is a non-lethal chemical weapon that stimulates the corneal nerves in the eyes to cause tears, pain, and even blindness. Common lachrymators include pepper spray (OC gas), CS gas, CR gas, CN gas (phenacyl chloride), nonivamide, bromoacetone, xylyl bromide, syn-propanethial-S-oxide (from onions), and Mace (a branded mixture).

Lachrymatory agents are commonly used for riot control. Their use as chemical warfare agents is prohibited by various international treaties. During World War I, increasingly toxic lachrymatory agents were used.

Could the use of chemical weapons upon Americans now be laid at the feet of Obama? Were the pursuits of Syrian citizens for safety in their shops and homes any less valuable to Asadd as the security and safety asked for by Lauree Salmon who said,"We feel for all households for the safety of all families. We want the National Guard to be brought in, we can't afford another night of what we went through"?

Police shot and killed a black man and the justice for it erupts into an all out binge of looting, riots,and revenge upon the whole community? How is it Hillary Clinton thinks Syrian rebels should be armed, trained,and educated in Syria but she doesn't see the need for it in St. Lois,Missouri?

Oh, that's different? Is it really? America needs to wake up to the hypocrisy laid at their feet here. Why aren't the looters and rioters armed with rpg's, and why are black people still looking for justice or an excuse to run rampant into stores for some free stuff if Obama's magical long form birth certificate and social security card are legit and ruling by race is better than ruling by the Constitution?

Why are the heads of foreign states held accountable for local up risings and hoodlums but our own national leaders are excused? I think you understand my point here. How can we excuse ourselves from not seeing the problems at home first while we point fingers abroad? People need to understand the conundrum of arming rebels of foreign states and the reluctance to furnish the same arms to rioters in St. Louis Missouri. Where is Hillary Clinton on properly arming and educating the looters and rioters with the good stuff, some heat seeking missiles and tank artillery? Yeah, its a little ludicrous to think there is a difference when you start asking shop owners in Syria and Ferguson.

How do we nationalize local problems abroad holding foreign state leaders responsible but localize them so well here in the U.S. removing Obama from problems in Missouri especially when it comes to domestic issues? This tendency is going to get us in more and more trouble. The results of that phenomenon have billions of tax dollars being wasted, miss used, and manipulated for political gains here.

Obama's race and ability to rule by race rather than using the Constitution starting with his own lack of eligibility has little to do with leading and Hillary Clinton has demonstrated here lack of trust in the U.S. Constitution supporting Obama. She may try to distance herself from him now, but her heart is quite attached as she has demonstrated for 6 years and continues to demonstrate by not taking a stand for the eligibility requirement in the Constitution for the Office of the President. Is Mrs. Clinton a racist because she put race ahead of the Constitution?

How is it Attorney General Eric Holder and the FBI are involved with criminal behavior with the poor black folks wanting justice while they are looting and rioting over a police shooting that left a black man dead, yet the head law enforcement agent and agency in our domestic backyard, make no bones about Obama putting out a forged long form birth certificate and fake draft registration? Is that a form of black on black violence happening that we all should be outraged over,or is it not seen that way by Democrats?

Mother of the slain black man rioters are upset about being shot.

Its the hypocrisy of our government that people can't stand. It encourages riots, looting, and criminal behavior because they get away with it, the incentive is there for others. Quite a few potential presidential candidates for 2016 are followed by the media that have done nothing, absolutely nothing about the outrage of ruling by race rather than ruling by the Constitution. The difference is an inequality among races that is an outrage!

You can google what Rand Paul,Sarah Palin, Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, and Hillary Clinton said about Barack Obama's policy, but what have they done about Obama's ineligibility and the Constitutional Crisis we are in right now because of it? I struggle with other presidential candidates even having a leg to stand on when they criticize Barack Obama about any policy and dismiss their own inaction in taking a stand for the Constitution that is violated with Obama's ineligibility. Has Obama, or have they provided a service to our Country in this?

People might say I don't criticize Obama's policies enough like Republicans and Democrats do, when the criticism amounts to a tacit endorsement of the Constitutional violation of his very real lack of qualification per the U.S. Constitution. If Obama's not eligible for the Office of the President do you think any of his policies are legit? I mean it really is like daring a 6 year old to drive a car without a license and than pulling him over and ticketing him for not signaling.

There are a few people who point to my own conviction 20 years ago as some indication of lawlessness, when it fact it serves as just the opposite. In fact there is a lively discussion about that under amazon discussion under the heading of sensible examination of Obama's long form certificate of life birth or COLB. When my law suit against Obama was brought up in the discussion as interesting, the only thing relative to that was a prior conviction 20 years ago? Its unreal what mysteries the left and right are willing to grasp at in order to prove a point rather than sensible facts and it goes to the heart of what's wrong in American Politics and why people are losing faith and confidence in the law.

Amazon.com discussion Sensible Examination Obama COLB -In reply to an earlier post on Aug 8, 2014 3:54:59 PM PDT
Jimmy E. says:
Cody Robert Judy is indeed your garden variety birther:
JUDY PLEADS GUILTY TO `BOMB' THREAT
By Jim Rayburn, Staff Writer
Thursday, June 3 1993
http://www.amazon.com/sensible-examination-Obama-LFCOLB-file/forum/Fx3O0GUS5OOQ7GV/Tx1R9VV7LL35QA2/376?asin=1936488299


I saw a really poignant saying the other day on facebook that I think is very relevant: "When your past calls, don't answer. It has nothing new to say." (smile) Personally its amazing to me to see Democrats who are so willing to excuse Obama's identity fabrications by slamming me with a violation for protesting. They excuse Hillary Clinton from leaving Ambassador Stevens and the others who actually died behind while distancing and gracing her with distance from Obama on 9-11 (September 11th,2012) just two years ago, but pounce on me for something that amounted to an unarmed vocal protest where no one was hurt, no property damage occurred, and I spent 8 years in prison for over twenty years ago?

So I've paid for any trouble and every political leader not opposing Obama are guilty of misprision of felony, the only thing lacking is the prosecution and sentencing? I mean what's worse the illegal action happening today among and abroad with our political leaders, or the one dearly paid for with obscure and sensible reason for excusing twenty years ago that was a protest in a religious meeting that was actually quite legal if you actually allow the facts to stand for themselves? If your not willing to do that, then of course your satisfied with the exactness of punishment served?

Responsibility comes in many sizes, shapes, and forms but one thing you will not hear from Democrats or Republicans is an appreciation for me taking on the responsibility for others mistakes just to sure up any and all differences. Has Obama taken on the responsibility for the looters and rioters in St. Lois Missouri? Does he want to? I can tell you it is really hard to do, and when that happens its called a sacrifice. But what is really an ultimate insult is when people deny the facts of my case in a religious setting with a religious book as proof of the protest abbreviated B.O.M. and they print 'fake-bomb'. Its really an insult to facts printed by the Media, much the same way Obama's covered up identity is coddled by the Main Stream Media. Most people would agree the Media is involved in a huge cover up.

People have asked me how I got to be such a good lawyer?(I'm smiling)Well, fighting for your life is a good motivation. I really can say I had no interest in politics before I went to prison in 1993 twenty-one years ago, but the experience of losing my Constitutional Rights as an individual sure came home to roost in my lap all of a sudden, but I am so grateful for that experience now.

If I had not had that experience do you think America would even have one single Presidential Candidate who stood up against McCain and Obama in 2008 and 2012 and said "No, you are not qualified" and I don't care what your race is? Republicans and Democrats don't want to discuss this with me, they want to discuss a 'criminal conviction' they also want to distort the facts. That is not even sensible or reasonable.

I believe in the American People, black,brown,white,red, and I don't care what color you are because it doesn't matter when the Constitution is kept afloat. When the Constitution is buried you better believe your going to see race and religion rule and woe be unto you if you are not in the majority of that riot!

Many people have a difficult time understanding or even comprehending my passion for the very beautiful United States Constitution. I myself can not even imagine being a minority and not being swooned by the powerful purposes of her principles, one of which just happens to be that, 15th Amendment 'no prior servitude shall be held against you' in running for a federal office or voting. One in five Americans on parole, probation or incarcerated lets you know I understand being a minority.

What a magnificent tool I have been given in spotting people who hate the Constitution and have clearly marked themselves as domestic enemies of our freedoms and liberties. All they have to do is light a match about my past servitude and they manifest themselves as haters of the Constitution. It doesn't take to much digging to find them on the out skirts of the loving Constitution's warm blanket and in the realms of a loathing cold case of communism and tyranny willing to take away freedoms and liberties and even your food while you look at them behind the barbed wires of the prisons they feel you're safer in.

I have a first rate understanding of the injustice minorities might feel, especially if the justice of the Constitution is no where to be found inside America. That to me is a wonderful service I have to offer everyone as President of the United States of America. When the power is given to you to turn your life around using the trials you have faced in a positive way a great light is yours to hold.

That opportunity I believe is what stands so supreme in America and makes her exceptional. Fighting for those exceptional principles are really what I call being engaged in a good cause that serves everyone. America should not be involved in being a police force for the world to call upon as some pathetically weak regime who cannot change the hearts and minds of men based on the poor example that is in the Office of the President or the poor examples of potential presidential candidates who mindlessly utter critics without doing or following up their rhetoric with actions that speak as loud as their words.

I am grateful for the internet where so many people can actually research the facts about me and do not have to be the subjects of a biased and false news report. I believe people are intelligent enough to understand basic facts and I think most 5 year olds can see through hypocrisy much easier than parents give them credit, why not an adult voter?

There maybe some bitterness in me about my lengthy and illegal incarceration the likes of which I don't think any one would want to face what I have faced for standing up for what was right, which I can always debate with people who are willing to be open minded and actually weigh things in the balance of justice. Why debate with fools who have no intentions, or heart, for justice and have long ago sold themselves out for a window of bars and a steal door slamming behind them as a reward for their deeds as they reap what they have sown.

If the sum total of feeling worthiness for the Office of the President revolves around spouting your mouth about issues of the past that you had power and a choice to change but refused in your elected or appointed office of trust with the American People, why doesn't the oath of the President involve that? You know the oath of the President is different then U.S. Reps and U.S. Senators just like the qualifications of those offices are different. "Preserve, Protect, and Defend the Constitution" is in the oath of the President within the Constitution and in the oath of a Representative and Senator is the only the word "Support" the Constitution.

Do you think our U.S. Representatives and U.S. Senators are supporting the Constitution when they wink at Obama's qualification? Do you think Obama is preserving, protecting, and defending the Constitution as he is a walking talking violation of it in his ineligibility? Do you think Americans are impressed with that? Well, their disapproval is certainly at an all time high and the approval of the Congress and Obama at an all time high. Maybe,.. just maybe Americans are not impressed and are looking for something, oh, I don't know, a little more real?

Here is an update on the Court Proceeding Judy v. Obama 1-14-cv-93 and the process I have to go through to get a Default Judgement signed by the Judge in the U.S. District Court.

Update on Judy v. Obama 1:14-cv-93 filed in the U.S. Court (District of Utah)
1. MOTION FOR DEFAULT W PROPOSED ORDER OF JUDGEMENT

2. ORDER OF DEFAULT JUDGEMENT (PROPOSED)


Those wishing to read the U.S. Federal Civil Rights Complaint may now do so here now as it is public information: Judy v. Obama 2014 U.S. FED Case No. 1:14cv00093


Wow!Just found my book, Taking A Stand, on sale at your local B&N for nook users if you prefer over soft or hard bound - only $8.49 That's a Great price

Cody Robert Judy
For U.S. President 2016

If you think “Truth” is worth it, support it and quit supporting the lie. That is the beginning of change, or we can just keep on going down this road and see where it leads with Obama. Which is it going to be?

TRUTH IS REAL

The Commercial is simply called "America"

Obama's Default Blown Sky High 2014 U.S. Crt. on Eligibility by 2016 Pres Candidate

FEATURED EDITORIAL- The Post & Email

Obama's Default Blown Sky High 2014 U.S. Crt. on Eligibility by 2016 Pres Candidate
Script for the Video Below for those who would rather read it-

"Good Morning - I'm Cody Robert Judy Candidate for U.S. President 2016 and I have some news I'd like to report to you that effects each and every American from sea to shining sea.

On July 7th,I filed in the U.S. Federal Court, District of Utah, a Civil Rights Law Suit for damages to my candidacy for President in 2008 and 2012 as well as the ongoing damages in my 2016 candidacy thus far.

With my complaint and attached to it were the 20 day Summons of the defendants that included, Barack Obama - The Democratic Party Leadership, as well as Barack Hussein Obama's Organization for America- In sum, those responsible corporations for the campaigns of Barack Hussein Obama.

Approximately a week later my motion to proceed was granted by the Court's assigned Judge and I received copies of the Summons I had delivered to the Court the prior week, in the mail, to be served.

The Court stamped Summons were served to the Defendants at the Democratic Party Headquarters, along with the Complaint July 16th and a Return Summons was filed in the Court the same day.

On July 21st Notice of a change of Judges was recognized by the Court in the form of an Order of Recusal by Judge Jenkins and Chief Judge Ted Stewart was reassigned for all further proceedings. That order signed by Judge Jenkins July 15.

The twenty day Summons served and Return of Service to the Court filed July 16th allowed Defendants to respond and oppose the facts so stated by August 5th, with a mailing of 3 days August 8th at the latest.

Page 2.

Forty years ago on August 8th,1974 President Richard Nixon announced his resignation. As Americans we celebrated truth and transparency that day from the cover up of just one person who happened to be, at that time, in the Office of President.

Today is August 9th, neither the Court nor I have received any dispute of the facts so stated in the complaint that presented evidence Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro is not a natural born Citizen qualified under the United States of America's Constitution.

The facts are undisputed, in the U.S. Court, a nefarious cover up has taken place involving fraud and forgery, involving one person, who just happens to be in the Office of the President.

Undisputed facts in a recognized U.S. Court of law that amounts to an admission of guilt - an admission that Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro is not a natural born Citizen qualified for the Office of the President according to the standard of the United States Constitution.

Ladies and Gentlemen today we celebrate transparency and truth- God has blessed America. I want you to pass this on to your Congressmen because it is Congress's responsibility to recognize facts the Judicial Branch has served.

I'm Cody Robert Judy and may God continue to bless America.

Here is an update on the Court Proceeding Judy v. Obama 1-14-cv-93 and the process I have to go through to get a Default Judgement signed by the Judge in the U.S. District Court.

Update on Judy v. Obama 1:14-cv-93 filed in the U.S. Court (District of Utah)
1. MOTION FOR DEFAULT W PROPOSED ORDER OF JUDGEMENT

2. ORDER OF DEFAULT JUDGEMENT (PROPOSED)


Those wishing to read the U.S. Federal Civil Rights Complaint may now do so here now as it is public information: Judy v. Obama 2014 U.S. FED Case No. 1:14cv00093




Obama's Default Blown Sky High 2014 U.S. Crt. on Eligibility by 2016 Pres Candidate


I'd sure appreciate your helping me out in the American Birther Campaign (ABC) Campaign for Cody Robert Judy for President 2016. Thank you for your consideration.



The Commercial is simply called "America"


With the new patriotic hit being written, produced, and performed by myself. ( 2016 U.S. Presidential Candidate Cody Robert Judy) here: "Dawn Your Light America"

Meant as a wake-up call to America of the dire circumstances we now face in our Republic, and all the beautiful reason we need to take an active part now in our political process, I hoped to inspire and at the same time warn America that if the goal of immigration has 'changed' from the opportunity to produce and enjoy the fruits of your own labor to being able to devour someone one elses we have a very clear reason to be concerned with Obama's transformation of America and a very clear reason we need to enforce the qualifications of the Office of the President as its described in the United States Constitution for our own national defense.



Wow!Just found my book, Taking A Stand, on sale at your local B&N for nook users if you prefer over soft or hard bound - only $8.49 That's a Great price

Last, but certainly not least we want to Thank You for tuning in and reading this blog. We celebrate today 150,000 Views and appreciate every single one.

Cody Robert Judy
For U.S. President 2016

If you think “Truth” is worth it, support it and quit supporting the lie. That is the beginning of change, or we can just keep on going down this road and see where it leads with Obama. Which is it going to be?

TRUTH IS REAL