Thursday, December 13, 2012



Just as Obama predicted when he handed out his long form birth certificate 3 years later from the White House press core room May 1st, 2011, ‘there would always be circus acts and carnival barkers’, who would not believe it was real, ie Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse and Birther Queen Orly Taitz to name two, the United States Supreme Court agreed to hear Judy v. Obama 12-5276, and very surprisingly Birthers and Anti-Birthers joined hands throughout America and the whole Nation jumped for joy!

Millions of letters have flooded the Supreme Court of the United States over the last two weeks from both Republican and Democrat Anti-Birthers as well as Birthers- mainly conservatives, wanting to put to rest, once and for all, the eligibility issue that Obama was not a ‘natural born citizen’ demanded by the Constitution’s qualifications for the Office of the President, before Obama’s second term in the White House, as a way of healing the Nation of the strife.

Hold it! Did I hear that right? Why would Anti-Birthers be sending letters hoping that SCOTUS heard this case? That would mean literally all of Congress on both sides of the isle, Republicans and Democrats actually were advocating SCOTUS hear this case.

Well, that could be the headline in two weeks as SCOTUS considers in their Jan 4th conference the Petition for Rehearing drawn up for Judy v. Obama 12-5276 and the argument is pretty positive on both sides that they want this heard! Let’s take a look at both.

Republicans and Democrats in Congress know just how hard it is to get a Constitutional Amendment passed with 2/3rds a majority of Congress. Just ask UT. R. Senator Orin Hatch, a perfect example of the Anti-Birther movement, how much time he has put in trying to get one through both houses that wasn’t just a non-binding resolution. For instance, in the U.S. Senate like “second”, the non-binding U.S. Senate Resolution 511 for John McCain passed in 2007-8, who was not born in the U.S. , at any military hospital, and “first” who was given his Citizenship 11 months after his birth 1936 by an Act of Congress specifically for the Panama Canal Zone in 1937.

Among other Anti-Birther leaders including the mixed crowd of Bobby Jindal, Rick Santorum, Marco Rubio, John McCain who are naturalized Citizens is the ever transparent Barack Obama who whole heartedly now supports the SCOTUS hearing a case millions of Americans are wanting heard. One must ask, “Why now have the Anti-Birthers become so exuberant and elated in the context of finally seeing a precedent come out of the highest court?”

The answer of course lies in two parts. First, the Plaintiff Cody Robert Judy: and second, the continuation of the Republican Party finally being able to out maneuver the Democrats at their own game.

Notice there are four guys on the national stage, five if you want to include the former California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger for Republicans , and only 1 Democrat Barack Obama who has a natural born citizen problem. Of course Democrats have already made a coronation for Hillary Clinton for 2016 and she has no problem with either birth place or parents being Citizens. So this whole argument is not about Democrats it’s about the Republican Party future.

Now the lone Democrat in the bunch Barack Obama wants to shut the mouths forever of advocates of the natural born citizen definition being “born in the U.S. to Citizen parents”, especially dog-gone attorneys like Mario Apuzzo, Larry Klayman, and Orly Taitz, not to mention Sheriff Joe Arpaio and his Cold Case Posse. How better to do that then by advocating the SCOTUS actually hear a case like the ones they are or have represented, but don’t have them as Counsel representing the Plaintiff? That answer is Cody Robert Judy v. Barack Obama Case 12-5276.

My case is actually a God send to Anti-Birthers (as well as Birthers), which is why they are actually converting and sending letters into SCOTUS advocating for them to hear this case, and becoming Birthers. They have never had a chance so marvelously placed before them for a ‘Precedent’ ruling adjudicated from the bench. From their position, there is no way they can lose against me!

I’m the biggest failure to ever hit politics! I’ve never won a political race in my life and I’ve ran five times; once for U.S. Representative in the House, twice for the U.S. Senate, and twice for President. That’s a record that Anti-Birthers are loving now, but wait there’s more when it comes to a record. How about 8 years in prison? Yes, I did 8 years in the Republican dominate State of Utah’s Correctional Facility.

Are you getting the picture of why Anti-birthers are saying “Yes Yes Yes..we can’t lose against this guy AND we can get a precedent case!”? But wait that’s not all, if you think that’s the peanut butter sandwich, wait till you see the strawberry jam that makes this so sweet. I have a record of failure even within the United States Supreme Court.

Many people don’t recall my case trying to pry the evidence out of the LDS Church Presidencies hands of the video tape featuring the act for which I was criminally prosecuted in Utah for what amounted to ‘entering a building with the ‘intent’ of committing a felony’, seen under United States Supreme Court Case Judy v. Hinckley 96-7655. Summing it up the LDS Church Presidency held the tape that showed me getting the shit kicked out of me, and refused to let me use it as evidence against the prosecution of case even thought the Government used it!

Of course many Anti-Birthers are quick to point out my criminal conviction twenty years ago, holding with that interest the facts generally presumed by the flippant statement, “Hey, if Judy couldn’t even get the SCOTUS to rule that evidence used against him in a court must in accordance with the Constitution be given to him to use”, then there’s NO WAY we are going to lose this eligibility case, so bring it on!

“Justice For All” really means “Justice for Whom the U.S. Supreme Court sees fit.
You see in my criminal case, the LDS “Mormon” Church Presidency had the tape of the whole incident, and to make a long story short, they gave it to the prosecuting attorney who gave it to the Judge, also at the time acting as a Bishop for the LDS Church, which coincidentally Mitt Romney has also acted as, and neither myself or the news media under FOIA could get it, because it would have completely unraveled the criminal conviction out in the public square. That didn’t look good for Republicans or the Church headquartered in Utah. Now all that wouldn’t be relevant unless the action for which I was prosecuted actually happened in a Church Meeting and the video showed my ‘intent’ something other than committing an unnamed felony.

This was also showcased in much the same hilarious way it sounds in 2002, that you can only grasp as told by the loveable Mr. Jon Stewart on the Daily Show. For a good laugh you gotta watch this clip, which also shows the loveable Stewart with slightly darker hair and a few less wrinkles then he has now.

The Daily Show with Jon StewartMon - Thurs 11p / 10c
Putting the Con back in Congress
Daily Show Full EpisodesPolitical Humor & Satire BlogThe Daily Show on Facebook

This mountain, and I mean MOUNTAIN, of evidence exist on the Anti-Birther side. Its got five future stars for the Republican Party and one guy whose already sat in the White House for four years just eyeballing this case like a fairway that was 200 yards wide and 400 yards deep with no sand traps or trees in it. There’s no way to lose to the Birthers by SCOTUS hearing this case and we have a chance to get a precedent out of this case that will totally shut everyone’s mouth.

Now Birthers would say of Sen. John McCain running for President again,”If it takes an Act of Congress to declare you first a “Citizen”, and a second Act of Congress to declare you a “Natural Born Citizen”, you probably have nature testifying against you and Congress trying to desperately over-ride nature.”

They would also point out that Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s whole Cold Case Posse Investigation, which they claim has well over 2600 hours of experienced law enforcement investigation in it declaring Obama’s long form birth certificate and his draft registration is actually a fraud, is inserted in the Judy v. Obama case for the SCOTUS. I’m sorry folks, but Sheriff Joe can’t get higher than the U.S. Supreme Court in a criminal investigation.

Anti-Birthers are delighted that within the Judy v. Obama 12-5276 is the entire Cold Case Posse Investigation! Yes, Sheriff Joe is in the United States Supreme Court as well as his Cold Case Posse findings. So along with this pathetically weak Plaintiff which stands no chance of winning is everyone they basically want to shut up. What could go wrong?

Birthers have been shut down out of so many courts due to “Standing” and even a more rigidly held legal precedent termed “competitive standing”, that they would just be delighted if the Supreme Court of the United States would actually hear the case, and they could get back to the dental office, or sheriff department, or complaining about the economy rather than the eligibility argument. Let’s face it, this argument has cost the U.S. billions of dollars, and is not the solution to raising the unemployment percentage in the United States. Hasn’t WND’s “Where’s the ‘real’ Birth Certificate” billboard campaign all over the nation been driving you nuts?

The Birthers think they have it won if the Court would just look at it. I mean Obama is only one out of how many Democrats competing for the Office of the President that isn’t natural born citizen? If there is a hard core look and argument at understanding that two things play a role in this: Place of Birth and Parents, Obama may have a 50/50 chance.

If both parents are respected as equals, and one parent is a U.S. Citizen and the other is say British. Is it fair for the U.S. Courts not to respect the British parent’s allegiance for the child?

If say the Court looks at the Father as the predominant parent because the wife takes his name in that whole male dominance thing in traditional marriages we are accustom to in our norms, shouldn’t Obama’s father, who is a Kenyan/British subject be given the respect he deserves for his son by our Courts?

Shouldn’t our Courts also respect the laws of Indonesia and the adoption laws and schooling laws which enabled Barack Obama to go to school over there, as a Citizen of Indonesia, with his adoption by Lolo Soetoro his step-father?

You know I have all these Anti-Birthers screaming and yelling at me, and I say to them, what in the world do you have to fear, and what in the world are you doing? Can’t you see that this is a case put on a silver platter for you?

You should be advocating at the top of your lungs along with Marco Rubio, Bobby Jindal, Rick Santorum, and John McCain that you would actually love along with the one Democrat Obama, to have the United States Supreme Court hear this case!

So come on you Anti-Birthers send your letter (suggested letter at end of post) in today advocating the Court hear this case, and send this to the media so they can start prepping this case up to the heightened state of awareness worthy of the big win your sure to achieve.

If you’re a Democrat who loves Obama, or a Democrat who secretly hoping for a future for the Republican Party, there is no reason to fear, because this cat’s in the bag for you! Right?

I want to thank the Anti-Birthers for coming around and supporting my candidacy for President, and also thank the Birthers for their continued conservative support, after all , it’s the Constitution this is all about and I’m just here to serve you anyway I can.

It’s not easy being used as a loser, but someone’s got to do it.

Thanks for Passing it on, supporting or contributing in any way you feel you can.

Cody Robert Judy
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign

Cody Robert Judy
Candidate ID P20003372
Committee ID C00501593

Links used in this article:

Address: City- State- Zip
- - - - - -
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Office of the Clerk – Mr. William K. Suter 1st Street N.E Washington, DC 20543-0001
RE: Cody Robert Judy v. Barack Obama 12-5276 This __Day of ____,201___

As a concerned Citizen, I would like to express my sincere interest in your upholding the rights of Cody Robert Judy as a natural born citizen and hear this case. The media is not representing my interest especially and everyone should be playing by the same rules.

Obama is not playing by the same rules in the race for President and I believe this deserves you utmost attention as the #_____ issue in the Constitution, mentioned 13 pages out of the 48 pages in the pamphlet of The Constitution that has to do with the Office of the President out numbering any other demand or principle at least 10 to 1. Is it any wonder I’m concerned?

This pillar of our Constitution demanding a natural born citizen affects literally every other right and organization of Government, and literally hinges our elections which I am aware are the laughing stalk of many foreign countries and governments now including many of our allies, as they even see we are totally ignoring this very important pillar.

As a patriot of The United States of America, I understand that a Elector can be dismissed if he/she is voting for an unqualified candidate and according to Obama's attorney Fischer the Electoral College as a body, should decide who is eligible as President and who is not, but that doesn't excuse the United States Supreme Court from its duty as an interpreter of the Constitution in the Judicial Body of our Government and specifically in Judy v. Obama 12-5276 because Congress Members cannot be Electors.

I affix my signature hereon of my own free will, and plainly state to you I am willing to lay my life down for the Constitution.
Sincerely Yours,

cc: Governor of my State __________________


  1. You don't realize it, but SCOTUS has already effectively denied your petition because it has been scheduled for a conference without any of the justices calling for a response from President Obama. SCOTUS never grants cert without either receiving a response from the respondent(s) or calling for one.

  2. @Anonymous Its amazing you haven't grasped the obvious "reason" for a letter campaign. Whew!

    1. Well, I'm not amazed that you declined to publish my follow-up comment.

      I'll check back with you next month, after SCOTUS formally rejects your petition.