Tuesday, September 9, 2014

TAKING A STAND for THE U.S. Constitution - A Witness for America

TAKING A STAND for THE U.S. Constitution - A Witness for America


It’s raining right now, a little thunder rolling around with the lighting so high in the cloudy sky you can’t see it. We know lighting always occurs when there is thunder. That piercing burst of electrical charge we call lighting is what causes the sound. You may not hear the thunder for quite some time after you see the lighting. In fact we used to count after seeing the lighting, one-thousand-one, one-thousand-two, one thousand-three understanding that sound was traveling slower than the light that had reached our eye and represented the sound traveling a mile upon ever count.

When I think about Obama’s ineligibility in the Office of the White House, I think of all the voters, both Republican and Democrat who were deceived about Obama being a ‘natural born Citizen’ qualified under the increased criteria of all three categories ‘natural born citizenship (Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents), age-35, and time in the U.S. 14 years, as compared to those qualifications tiered down from the offices of a Representative, or Senator.

It seems no one disagrees that you have to be at least twenty-five (25) years old to be a U.S. Representative, and thirty (30) years of age to be a U.S. Senator, and thirty-five (35) years of age to be President as an increasing criteria of qualification. No one disagrees with the United States Constitution that separates with another increasing demand upon the qualifications of the offices when it comes to ‘time’ of being a ‘Citizen’ for a U.S. Representative its seven (7) years, for a U.S. Senator nine (9) years, and finally to be President you must have been a resident fourteen (14) years.

Quite clearly a distinction happens upon the Office of the President in comparison to the Offices of a Representative in more three ways.

1) You have to be thirty-five (35) years of age.
2) You have to have been a residence in the United States fourteen (14) years.
3) You have to be a ‘natural born Citizen’

Many people look at the time for a U.S. Representative to be a “Citizen” of the United States seven (7) years, and the time of a U.S. Representative to be a “Citizen” nine (9) years as the same qualification as the President’s qualification to be a “Resident” fourteen (14) years.

If it was the same type of Citizenship requirement we would see it read “the President must be a “Citizens” fourteen (14) years. However, the word difference in that requirement is as different as night is from day. Clearly, Representatives and Senators are held to be “Citizens” seven (7) and nine (9) years respectively, and the President a “resident” fourteen (14) years.

Now is that because we don’t expect our President to be a Citizen? Not at all, in fact we expect that the President actually be a ‘natural born Citizen’ which meant he/she be “born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents”, which is not required in the term “Citizen”. We know aliens can apply for U.S. Citizenship through a process called ‘naturalization’. These citizens can go on to be Representatives after 7 years and U.S. Senators after 9 years, but they can never be President, but if married to a U.S. Citizen and afterwards having children, these children could be President some day.

This language difference between ‘citizen’ and ‘residence’ is one of two testaments that exist which plainly declare a ‘natural born Citizen’ be something that a ‘citizen’ is not. The other is of course what we refer to as the ‘grandfather’ clause in the Office of the President’s qualification.

This is where we do see the word “Citizen” used as a qualification for the Office of the President instead of ‘natural born Citizen’. In that clause we see the President must be “a ‘natural born Citizen’, or a ‘Citizen’ of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution”.

Other unique distinctions exist between the Office of Representatives and Senators also from the President in that they must be an ‘inhabitant’ of the particular State in which they seek office.

See the 2016 Commercial Exhibiting the Differences of the Offices here in two minutes " A Constitutional Reckoning".

Of course many of our first presidents did not have parents, who were citizens of the United States, and some had not been born here, however, George Washington was born in Westmoreland County, VA., under British Rule. George Washington’s father was Augustine Washington also born in VA in 1694. His mother Mary Ball Washington was born in Lively, VA in 1708 under British rule: So none of them were born in the United States and neither was Sen. John McCain, but he didn’t qualify as living at the time of the adoption of the Constitution and was ‘naturalized’ by an Act of Congress specifically for the Panama Canal Zone.

Should Sen. McCain be exempted from the qualification demands when the people being naturalized yesterday are not? Further proof exist that Sen. McCain knew he was not a ‘natural born Citizen’ because he rounded up his friends in the Senate and they all made up non-binding U.S. Senate Resolution 511, which declared him a ‘natural born Citizen’. Why would someone ‘need’ something like that? I’m a ‘natural born Citizen’, Born in Idaho Falls, Idaho, and both my parents qualified as Citizens. I didn’t need an act of Congress, but Sen. John McCain has had two acts of Congress acting as a buffer of naturalization for him.

U.S. Senate Resolution 511 failed to pass in the U.S. House of Representatives and was not signed into law by a legal President so in no way, shape, or form did it change the qualifications for the Office of the President. Then Sen. Hillary Clinton and Sen. Barack Obama were co-sponsors of the non-binding senate resolution for Sen. John McCain and every Republican U.S. Senator except Sen. McCain voted for it in a Democratic Party controlled U.S. Senate.

What an honor for Sen. McCain to have Democrat Claire McCaskill also sponsor the bill and have every Republican U.S. Senator in the minority vote for it. Do you think every ‘naturalized’ immigrant ought to have the same preferential and elite privilege? If anything this serves as an example of a form of discrimination towards the rest of us that current elitism can be demonstrated by Congress in the form as grievous as receiving ‘titles of nobility’ that are stated shall not be granted by the United States.

‘Titles of Nobility’ frowned upon as a shadow of tyranny shall not be granted by the United States is our law, and isn’t the idea surrounding ‘Titles of Nobility’ really at the root of making most people servant to the law, and making a few ,or even one, exempt from it?

As a Candidate for President in 2008 I sued Sen. McCain for dishonoring the Constitution’s qualification demands for the Office of the President as he was a violation of the law in that Office. The District Court Judge waited until after the election to make his final ruling ignoring my protest of such because so much money was being wasted on an unqualified candidate. Indeed, he ruled it was ‘moot’ only because Obama had won, thus Sen. John McCain was not actually in the Office of the President in order of a violation.

Does that make Republicans happy about all their campaign dollars in 2008 going full throttle for a walking talking violation of the Office of the President as a ‘nominee’? I don’t think it would, but hell has no fury like the Republicans when their ‘man’ has a problem with qualifying for the Office of the President.
Indeed it seems the Republican Prayer to God goes something like, “God grant the hell on earth released upon Obama in his ineligibility, but grant thy heavenly mercy upon a Republican Nominee oh Lord”. Why can’t Republicans see their own hypocrisy?

Indeed every day I wonder who I’m fighting more of and more for Republicans or Democrats? I’m fighting Republicans on the issue of whether Sen. McCain based on military service that so many other naturalized citizens also have but do not qualify, as well as unqualified yet potentially considered by Republicans to be front running undeclared candidates for 2016 like Sen. Ted Cruz, Sen. Marco Rubio, Gov. Bobby Jindal, and Sen. Rick Santorum who I know went through 11 million dollars of campaign contribution holding a Canadian citizenship in his 2012 run.

How is this legal or even ethical moral high ground for any of those unqualified candidates? When you exempt yourself from the laws demanding a ‘natural born Citizen’ in the Office of the President, not only do you slide into a miserable abyss for yourself, but you become a cheering partner for the other party’s unqualified candidate in Obama who now is in the Office of the President as an unqualified person and you become a party to the problem and present yourself as a domestic enemy of the United States Constitution supporting those destructive forces of our sovereignty and in short the greatest national security breach in the United States history!

In such a position I question what ground you stand on with our Creator. I imagine every hard earned campaign dollar given to you by an unsuspecting grandmother or grandfather in their desire and prayers that our United States Constitution be upheld in these perilous times and I get sick to my stomach in the thought of defending you in front of God as a leader. If I can’t defend you in front of God as a leader and maintain the moral high ground in my conscience something is wrong.

I can’t even comprehend your defense and affidavit to God about every campaign dollar you stole when you were not qualified for the office that you sought should you be elected, as you recited in your candidate’s oath of office.

As I worked on and released a new commercial for my book, “Taking A Stand the conservative independent voice”, I reflected on the powerful message that my witness holds in the pages that is even more poignant now in 2014 than it was in 2008 when I was running and in the absolute battle against McCain and the Republican Establishment in the Republican National Committee who received the law suit three (3) days before McCain was made the Republican nominee in 2008.

Now when you look back on this you absolutely have a witness that there was a Presidential Candidate who was challenging McCain before Obama on the ‘natural born Citizen’ qualification clause of the Constitution and what does that do to all the ‘racist’ and ‘discrimination’ charges asserted by the Media for those challenging Obama? It neutralizes them and when you pull the race card away from Obama and make it all about being American that is BIG, because he is thriving on the opposite, but he’s doing so with Republican consent!

When you put that into context with 10 Trillion Dollars stacked on our national debt, over 25 scandals that have erupted in 2014, that may not have erupted if Obama was not in the Office of the President, including Benghazi, Fast & Furious, all the spying and manipulation scandal of and on the Media and the American Public, you begin to understand the implications and the historical importance of this book’s witness.

If every American had read “Taking A Stand” in 2008 and it had been heralded on the New York Times Best Sellers list, guess what? Obama would not even exist. If Obama didn’t exist what else would be missing? How important is a witness that we respect as being filed in a Court of Law by a Presidential Candidate with standing for the “natural born Citizen” clause in race relations?

I am the only Presidential Candidate in America whose witness came against McCain and Obama in Court that the Media could take to the bank. I declare this as a peace between all races in America. The honor was mine to defend the Constitution and with my actions I have done everything I could think of to celebrate our Constitution as a law above every American’s head, not just most of us.

This is why I believe you should buy this book and spread it to your neighbors and declare it as truth in your social networks. The power of it is remarkable in bringing us together under the Supreme Law of the Land, rather than dividing with the tacit embers of racial discrimination.

Please enjoy my new 2 Minute Spot for this witness Taking A Stand – the conservative independent voice. I hope you will receive it as the very important witness that it is for our whole Country. It must be proclaimed from the house tops or we are bound to suffer a divide unparalleled in our history. I implore you to hound and pound every so-called political conservative commentator with that witness. I hope you buy them a copy of the book and throw it at them until they are buried in it or standing on a mound of them.

Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, and all the others with books on the best sellers list, do not offer, combined, the witness Taking A Stand does in the power as a witness for truth and law in the political arena effecting every American for the last two presidential cycles and over 2 Billion dollars in campaign contributions not to mention the indebtedness of 10 Trillion dollars, and the lives that have been lost in cover-ups. If you cannot see this, your eyes are truly blinded even though you can see.

You have seen the lightening in the sky in violations, now read the thunder that Taking A Stand is. Get it as a Nook Book now for only $8.49, or as a Hard Back Cover for 28.95 and or Soft Cover for $22.75.

Taking A Stand 2 Minute Promo Spot

On a matter of 'House Keeping' the Affidavit for the Default Certificate and a follow-up Motion for Default Judgement and Order were filed in the Judy v. Obama 2014 Civil Case 1:14-cv-00093 this last Tuesday, Sept 2nd, 2014.
Update on Judy v. Obama 1:14-cv-93 filed in the U.S. Court (District of Utah)


Those wishing to read the U.S. Federal Civil Rights Complaint may now do so here now as it is public information: Judy v. Obama 2014 U.S. FED Case No. 1:14cv00093

Update: Good article here on Obama's SS#

Cody Robert Judy

Wow!Just found my book, Taking A Stand, on sale at your local B&N for nook users if you prefer over soft or hard bound - only $8.49 That's a Great price

Cody Robert Judy
For U.S. President 2016

If you think “Truth” is worth it, support it and quit supporting the lie. That is the beginning of change, or we can just keep on going down this road and see where it leads with Obama. Which is it going to be?


The Commercial is simply called "America"

No comments:

Post a Comment