Showing posts with label voter. Show all posts
Showing posts with label voter. Show all posts

Friday, April 29, 2016

A SPECIAL REPORT: WOMEN - WE are The Majority - Sacrificing Choice, Innocence, & Our Children's Futures

 A SPECIAL REPORT 
___________________
 WOMEN - WE are The Majority -

Sacrificing Choice, Innocence, & Our Children's Future
________________________________


The thought occurred to me that woman are not acting like a Minority in defending the United States Constitution. Our Republic under the U.S.Constitution is designed to respect individual rights. The U.S. Constitution protects Individual rights in a synopsis the Minority is able to stand up against the Majority when specific rights are trampled. Because of the 19th Amendment that gave Citizen's suffrage without regard to sex, sometimes we think of women more as a minority needing these protections adopted in the Constitution.
I've been careening my head and wrestling about the dismal support in general of Woman for the [natural born Citizen] qualification for the Office of President. ie. Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents for some two weeks now. Scratching my head at this and trying to understand it because on the outset women have a great interest in protecting their children in a natural instinct of 'nurturing' that I think should be very friendly to this Core Protection in the Constitution.

Additionally, women very much in a Civil understanding have more experience of being treated as weaker sex, not being allowed to vote, being shunned for divorce or not being given a Choice in many instances of history in the reproductive rights, which should engender a defense for the protections of the U.S. Constitution especially at the Core of it in the Office of President.

This however has not translated into support either by Contributions or readership for which I've scratched my head about until the question was formed: Why? Why aren't woman acting like a Minority any more? And the answer is because they just aren't. The laws have been changed to favor them in almost every perspective and as it happens often the majority gets complacent with their rights because they begin taking them for granted. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has no doubt made great strides in achieving office and made unprecedented roads towards the Office of the President, but she's also made unprecedented roads in sacrificing the Principles of that Office by not challenging Obama's ineligibility which has in fact lead to everything we are going through now that is panning out like a golden road to disaster.

Women's choices are protected in most aspects. They can get divorced and file such as a Majority, most always getting favor in property which also might be parallel the majority filing. There's no CIVIL office they are prohibited from based on gender. They can vote. Minimum wage is the same for both genders.

So what's this thing in my head about so little respect for supporting the Constitution especially surrounding the Office of President in the concern for national security via children and weaknesses in vulnerability of gender in a Minority position?

Well, as I researched this I found the facts don't lie. Woman are a Majority and as such are, I believe, slipping into a complacency of their Constitutional Rights afforded and protected by the U.S. Constitution in their voting block faster then they even can comprehend; even whilst Hillary Clinton is promising the world to women they actually already have it as a Majority.

Perhaps in the hope that the FBI does not handle her choice to change the Computer Server of the U.S. Federal Government to her own private server in the official conduct of Secretary of State? No doubt, the U.S. Government might have something to say about changing their server, but she didn't ask, she just made that decision and I don't think it was in the interest of FOIA or serving the people in a responsibility of that office.Yes, its true women are the Majority.

With the exception of Alaska and North Dakota women are the Majority or equal in every State of the Union and Men are the Minority. Tossing the States whose population is equal, Women are a Majority in the Majority of States.

State by State Gender 2014 Population Distribution http://kff.org/other/state-indicator/distribution-by-gender/
FEATURED number of Women in Congress from 2008 to 2016



So my hunch was correct. Women are more to blame as the irresponsible voting block for our National Security breach in the Office of the President. In 2012 Mitt Romney lost the women's vote by 12 points, the largest ever since recording started in 1952 and despite winning the men's vote by 8 points lost the election by 2 points.

Make no mistake about it as an ineligible person in the Office of President has shown  more favorable to open borders that most harmfully leans on women's innocence & children 37%  of all federal crimes in 2014, ruining the American way of life as far as prosperity loading 10 Trillion of 20 on the backs of their children effectively adding 70K/person during the last eight years which is generational theft, favoring weapons sales to Muslim Theocratically Controlled Countries that support Sharia Law that is a known [subjectification of women] in philosophy. Four F16 Fighters, 200 Abrams Tanks [given] to Egypt Muslim Brotherhood, Iran Nuclear Deal releases 100 Billion,  Saudi Arabia 46 Billion, in fact "the volume of major deals concluded by the Obama administration in its first five years [exceeds] the amount approved by the Bush administration in its full eight years in office by nearly $30 billion. That also means that the Obama administration has approved more arms sales than any U.S. administration since World War II."

Of course the Office of the President or person in it cannot be blamed for every kidnapping, every rape, robbery, stabbing shooting or atrocity, however the choice in that Office is indeed responsible for a general course of action that must be weighed in the balance of good for or against the U.S. Picture a ship in the ocean smooth sailing on one side and shark invested waters on the other in the distance - which do you hope to drift toward with the rudder for a nice afternoon swim?

The President signs every Bill passed by the Legislature- Obamacare was one of those needing a qualified President's signature that encapsulated 1/5 of the entire economy. The Office of the President Directs and Commands nearly every turn of the Military and Border Security General Principle of our Nation. It's near impossible to say the Character of a person in that Office is not affected by Place and both Parents, which should be in the BIGGEST agreement with women as mothers.

It also just so happens to be the only Office in our Government requiring the unique qualification of born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents - [ natural born Citizen] and in the United States Supreme Court the defining articulation in Case, Minor v. Happersett [No Doubt] those born in the Country of Parents who are Citizens of it are [natural born Citizens].

[At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or [natural-born citizens], as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their [p168] parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first.]

Oh the irony of the [United States Supreme Court Case] and Decision that defined [natural born Citizen] actually being on behalf of a women-  Mrs. Virginia Minor, a native born, free, white citizen of the United States, and of the State of Missouri, over the age of twenty-one years, wishing to vote for electors for President and Vice-President of the United States, and for a representative in Congress, and for other officers, at the general election held in November, 1872, applied to one Happersett, the registrar of voters, to register her as a lawful voter, which he refused to do, assigning for cause that she was not a "male citizen of the United States," but a woman. She thereupon sued him in one of the inferior State courts of Missouri, for willfully refusing to place her name upon the list of registered voters, by which refusal she was deprived of her right to vote.

So it is a Great Burden of women that they as a Majority have and are sacrificing what is most precious to them., their children and innocence by their confirmation of a Majority and their slothful diligence to these precious Principles.

A Contemporary Understanding of two verses in ISAIAH
The circumstances are very difficult indeed for me to make this egregious report owning to my own heart naturally drawn out to protect women most natural and instinctive, but that protection cannot come  or be placed upon me as to be my own dereliction accept by my silence.

I noticed in the collection of contributions for my own presidential campaign nearly five to one were from males compared to females. 

What can we say after realizing this? Maybe we were not hard enough on you? Maybe we did not teach it well enough? Women today make up half of the entire professional and technical work force in the United States.

Yet men still dominate in political contributions . More women vote, but only about 30% of big donors contributing are women. Understanding this takes on some relevant features such as opinions may stretch:
ie. [ It’s not that women are less willing or less able to give in general. Despite the wage gap, women, across a variety of demographic variables, are more likely to give to charity than men are. Politics is the outlier, with men’s giving outnumbering women’s. A philanthropy researcher offers an explanation: “They give out of more empathetic and altruistic reasons than men do,” said Debra Mesch, the director of the Women’s Philanthropy Institute at the Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy. “Women may not feel that their money in the political arena is going to fulfill those motivations.”]

What?! Really? If women didn't feel that their money in the political arena was going to fulfill those motivations - in reference to empathetic and altruistic motivations of giving, why do more women vote than men? They obviously feel a responsibility to the voting booth. If women have failed to give in Political Campaigns I believe it's because they have not been educated to the direct link in the generals of the three things we have discussed, or.. well let's get to it.

1-The importance of the Constitution in their rights as individuals; 2- crime upon the innocents that can be given a deferred prosecution status allowed by law in the Executive Commander-In-Chief position in not enforcing borders and laws, and 3- the basics of responsibility to balancing a check book for the safety of our future generations as it pertains to our National Debt and the importance of delaying gratification in the spending department.

That's right 66% of women are carrying credit card debt compared to 33% of men. [ Stick to a budget. The easiest way to avoid credit card debt – regardless of your age or gender – is to create and stick to a budget. At the beginning of the month, decide how you’ll spend your money, and stick to it.]

Let's pose the question for women. You can get the belt and those matching accessory earrings  to that outfit or send $25 dollars to your favorite Presidential Candidate which one is more important to you?

Ask the same question to men. You can get the more expensive balls and walk for a round of golf instead of riding or send $25 dollars to your favorite Presidential Candidate?

What I'm trying to point out here is that women have so much more to lose in my biased male opinion that it is beyond making any sense for them to sacrifice one single line of the Constitution, and if they were to sacrifice a line the one of most value and importance to their rights and the safety of their children in indeed is the one I am protecting and standing up for. I am the only one in America to have a Federal Court Record in protecting and standing up for it in Judy v. McCain and Judy v. Obama in the U.S. Supreme Court. A women's world is the quickest one to change as it was the hardest one to get where they have finally gotten to in America and in the Office of the President can that world change the fastest and most dramatically with an ineligible person.

Now you might be saying to yourself that any money you send to me is a waste because of this or that. That's just bull.  If women get together and send me half of what ineligible Ted Cruz has been sent the Politicians in Washington DC will faint!!! Congress would real!!! and I'm thinking we could move the world in ways you have no idea we could, but the most important factors would be those three we discussed.
1- Safety 2- Crime & 3- National Debt -which could very easily lead to WWWIII slaying millions of your sons and daughters and leaving a lot of blood on your hands. No it's not a joking matter.

In my humble service to you, I haven't made a dime in the last 7 years and 15 Cases of law because I've felt it was so important. I hope you know it doesn't make a bit of sense for me to come here and to cuss you out and make you feel bad for not supporting me with contributions in order to get contributions. In this I agree, but in my motivation for doing and delivering the message I have to say it is indeed your Heavenly Father who has seen this and my interest is not in seeing how much or how many contributions I can get, because that is far from the main point of my relaying the message.

 What you do with it is between you and God. I had the courage and love to deliver it.

Let it not come to haunt me in my Eternal Judgement that my care, concern, and love for you my sisters in the USA was not a very high priority. I can only say., please please.. Repent of this which means change your course now. Do not let your hands be bloodied by your own children in this. It is an eternal regret that would be very difficult to bear. To have done harm to the ones you said you loved creates a very hot hell of regret that just a little effort now on your part can soothe in a big way. I hope you will take advantage of that now.

May God Bless You for that courage and may any contributions you make be seen as your sincere protection and interest for those little ones and the Rights you have, as something I am very weak in understanding but whom I trust God knows much better than I- Women. I certainly hope you receive this as as matter of great respect that I have for you.

Sincerely,
CRJ

Here's the Link to Contribute if you'd like to Cody's Campaign improve your record for Taking A Stand for the Constitution.
 www.codyjudy.us


Thank You!


Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy Campaign
Cody Robert Judy



Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.

Web Site www.codyjudy.us
Keep coming back!


INSPIRING - I believe in You


Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!





Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION


1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts

12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial

13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008

14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case

15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.


















































Tuesday, September 9, 2014

TAKING A STAND for THE U.S. Constitution - A Witness for America



TAKING A STAND for THE U.S. Constitution - A Witness for America

FEATURED EDITORIAL: The Post & Email

It’s raining right now, a little thunder rolling around with the lighting so high in the cloudy sky you can’t see it. We know lighting always occurs when there is thunder. That piercing burst of electrical charge we call lighting is what causes the sound. You may not hear the thunder for quite some time after you see the lighting. In fact we used to count after seeing the lighting, one-thousand-one, one-thousand-two, one thousand-three understanding that sound was traveling slower than the light that had reached our eye and represented the sound traveling a mile upon ever count.

When I think about Obama’s ineligibility in the Office of the White House, I think of all the voters, both Republican and Democrat who were deceived about Obama being a ‘natural born Citizen’ qualified under the increased criteria of all three categories ‘natural born citizenship (Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents), age-35, and time in the U.S. 14 years, as compared to those qualifications tiered down from the offices of a Representative, or Senator.

It seems no one disagrees that you have to be at least twenty-five (25) years old to be a U.S. Representative, and thirty (30) years of age to be a U.S. Senator, and thirty-five (35) years of age to be President as an increasing criteria of qualification. No one disagrees with the United States Constitution that separates with another increasing demand upon the qualifications of the offices when it comes to ‘time’ of being a ‘Citizen’ for a U.S. Representative its seven (7) years, for a U.S. Senator nine (9) years, and finally to be President you must have been a resident fourteen (14) years.

Quite clearly a distinction happens upon the Office of the President in comparison to the Offices of a Representative in more three ways.

1) You have to be thirty-five (35) years of age.
2) You have to have been a residence in the United States fourteen (14) years.
3) You have to be a ‘natural born Citizen’

Many people look at the time for a U.S. Representative to be a “Citizen” of the United States seven (7) years, and the time of a U.S. Representative to be a “Citizen” nine (9) years as the same qualification as the President’s qualification to be a “Resident” fourteen (14) years.

If it was the same type of Citizenship requirement we would see it read “the President must be a “Citizens” fourteen (14) years. However, the word difference in that requirement is as different as night is from day. Clearly, Representatives and Senators are held to be “Citizens” seven (7) and nine (9) years respectively, and the President a “resident” fourteen (14) years.

Now is that because we don’t expect our President to be a Citizen? Not at all, in fact we expect that the President actually be a ‘natural born Citizen’ which meant he/she be “born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents”, which is not required in the term “Citizen”. We know aliens can apply for U.S. Citizenship through a process called ‘naturalization’. These citizens can go on to be Representatives after 7 years and U.S. Senators after 9 years, but they can never be President, but if married to a U.S. Citizen and afterwards having children, these children could be President some day.

This language difference between ‘citizen’ and ‘residence’ is one of two testaments that exist which plainly declare a ‘natural born Citizen’ be something that a ‘citizen’ is not. The other is of course what we refer to as the ‘grandfather’ clause in the Office of the President’s qualification.

This is where we do see the word “Citizen” used as a qualification for the Office of the President instead of ‘natural born Citizen’. In that clause we see the President must be “a ‘natural born Citizen’, or a ‘Citizen’ of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution”.

Other unique distinctions exist between the Office of Representatives and Senators also from the President in that they must be an ‘inhabitant’ of the particular State in which they seek office.

See the 2016 Commercial Exhibiting the Differences of the Offices here in two minutes " A Constitutional Reckoning".

Of course many of our first presidents did not have parents, who were citizens of the United States, and some had not been born here, however, George Washington was born in Westmoreland County, VA., under British Rule. George Washington’s father was Augustine Washington also born in VA in 1694. His mother Mary Ball Washington was born in Lively, VA in 1708 under British rule: So none of them were born in the United States and neither was Sen. John McCain, but he didn’t qualify as living at the time of the adoption of the Constitution and was ‘naturalized’ by an Act of Congress specifically for the Panama Canal Zone.

Should Sen. McCain be exempted from the qualification demands when the people being naturalized yesterday are not? Further proof exist that Sen. McCain knew he was not a ‘natural born Citizen’ because he rounded up his friends in the Senate and they all made up non-binding U.S. Senate Resolution 511, which declared him a ‘natural born Citizen’. Why would someone ‘need’ something like that? I’m a ‘natural born Citizen’, Born in Idaho Falls, Idaho, and both my parents qualified as Citizens. I didn’t need an act of Congress, but Sen. John McCain has had two acts of Congress acting as a buffer of naturalization for him.

U.S. Senate Resolution 511 failed to pass in the U.S. House of Representatives and was not signed into law by a legal President so in no way, shape, or form did it change the qualifications for the Office of the President. Then Sen. Hillary Clinton and Sen. Barack Obama were co-sponsors of the non-binding senate resolution for Sen. John McCain and every Republican U.S. Senator except Sen. McCain voted for it in a Democratic Party controlled U.S. Senate.

What an honor for Sen. McCain to have Democrat Claire McCaskill also sponsor the bill and have every Republican U.S. Senator in the minority vote for it. Do you think every ‘naturalized’ immigrant ought to have the same preferential and elite privilege? If anything this serves as an example of a form of discrimination towards the rest of us that current elitism can be demonstrated by Congress in the form as grievous as receiving ‘titles of nobility’ that are stated shall not be granted by the United States.

‘Titles of Nobility’ frowned upon as a shadow of tyranny shall not be granted by the United States is our law, and isn’t the idea surrounding ‘Titles of Nobility’ really at the root of making most people servant to the law, and making a few ,or even one, exempt from it?

As a Candidate for President in 2008 I sued Sen. McCain for dishonoring the Constitution’s qualification demands for the Office of the President as he was a violation of the law in that Office. The District Court Judge waited until after the election to make his final ruling ignoring my protest of such because so much money was being wasted on an unqualified candidate. Indeed, he ruled it was ‘moot’ only because Obama had won, thus Sen. John McCain was not actually in the Office of the President in order of a violation.

Does that make Republicans happy about all their campaign dollars in 2008 going full throttle for a walking talking violation of the Office of the President as a ‘nominee’? I don’t think it would, but hell has no fury like the Republicans when their ‘man’ has a problem with qualifying for the Office of the President.
Indeed it seems the Republican Prayer to God goes something like, “God grant the hell on earth released upon Obama in his ineligibility, but grant thy heavenly mercy upon a Republican Nominee oh Lord”. Why can’t Republicans see their own hypocrisy?

Indeed every day I wonder who I’m fighting more of and more for Republicans or Democrats? I’m fighting Republicans on the issue of whether Sen. McCain based on military service that so many other naturalized citizens also have but do not qualify, as well as unqualified yet potentially considered by Republicans to be front running undeclared candidates for 2016 like Sen. Ted Cruz, Sen. Marco Rubio, Gov. Bobby Jindal, and Sen. Rick Santorum who I know went through 11 million dollars of campaign contribution holding a Canadian citizenship in his 2012 run.

How is this legal or even ethical moral high ground for any of those unqualified candidates? When you exempt yourself from the laws demanding a ‘natural born Citizen’ in the Office of the President, not only do you slide into a miserable abyss for yourself, but you become a cheering partner for the other party’s unqualified candidate in Obama who now is in the Office of the President as an unqualified person and you become a party to the problem and present yourself as a domestic enemy of the United States Constitution supporting those destructive forces of our sovereignty and in short the greatest national security breach in the United States history!

In such a position I question what ground you stand on with our Creator. I imagine every hard earned campaign dollar given to you by an unsuspecting grandmother or grandfather in their desire and prayers that our United States Constitution be upheld in these perilous times and I get sick to my stomach in the thought of defending you in front of God as a leader. If I can’t defend you in front of God as a leader and maintain the moral high ground in my conscience something is wrong.

I can’t even comprehend your defense and affidavit to God about every campaign dollar you stole when you were not qualified for the office that you sought should you be elected, as you recited in your candidate’s oath of office.

As I worked on and released a new commercial for my book, “Taking A Stand the conservative independent voice”, I reflected on the powerful message that my witness holds in the pages that is even more poignant now in 2014 than it was in 2008 when I was running and in the absolute battle against McCain and the Republican Establishment in the Republican National Committee who received the law suit three (3) days before McCain was made the Republican nominee in 2008.

Now when you look back on this you absolutely have a witness that there was a Presidential Candidate who was challenging McCain before Obama on the ‘natural born Citizen’ qualification clause of the Constitution and what does that do to all the ‘racist’ and ‘discrimination’ charges asserted by the Media for those challenging Obama? It neutralizes them and when you pull the race card away from Obama and make it all about being American that is BIG, because he is thriving on the opposite, but he’s doing so with Republican consent!

When you put that into context with 10 Trillion Dollars stacked on our national debt, over 25 scandals that have erupted in 2014, that may not have erupted if Obama was not in the Office of the President, including Benghazi, Fast & Furious, all the spying and manipulation scandal of and on the Media and the American Public, you begin to understand the implications and the historical importance of this book’s witness.

If every American had read “Taking A Stand” in 2008 and it had been heralded on the New York Times Best Sellers list, guess what? Obama would not even exist. If Obama didn’t exist what else would be missing? How important is a witness that we respect as being filed in a Court of Law by a Presidential Candidate with standing for the “natural born Citizen” clause in race relations?

I am the only Presidential Candidate in America whose witness came against McCain and Obama in Court that the Media could take to the bank. I declare this as a peace between all races in America. The honor was mine to defend the Constitution and with my actions I have done everything I could think of to celebrate our Constitution as a law above every American’s head, not just most of us.

This is why I believe you should buy this book and spread it to your neighbors and declare it as truth in your social networks. The power of it is remarkable in bringing us together under the Supreme Law of the Land, rather than dividing with the tacit embers of racial discrimination.

Please enjoy my new 2 Minute Spot for this witness Taking A Stand – the conservative independent voice. I hope you will receive it as the very important witness that it is for our whole Country. It must be proclaimed from the house tops or we are bound to suffer a divide unparalleled in our history. I implore you to hound and pound every so-called political conservative commentator with that witness. I hope you buy them a copy of the book and throw it at them until they are buried in it or standing on a mound of them.

Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, and all the others with books on the best sellers list, do not offer, combined, the witness Taking A Stand does in the power as a witness for truth and law in the political arena effecting every American for the last two presidential cycles and over 2 Billion dollars in campaign contributions not to mention the indebtedness of 10 Trillion dollars, and the lives that have been lost in cover-ups. If you cannot see this, your eyes are truly blinded even though you can see.

You have seen the lightening in the sky in violations, now read the thunder that Taking A Stand is. Get it as a Nook Book now for only $8.49, or as a Hard Back Cover for 28.95 and or Soft Cover for $22.75.

Taking A Stand 2 Minute Promo Spot



On a matter of 'House Keeping' the Affidavit for the Default Certificate and a follow-up Motion for Default Judgement and Order were filed in the Judy v. Obama 2014 Civil Case 1:14-cv-00093 this last Tuesday, Sept 2nd, 2014.
Update on Judy v. Obama 1:14-cv-93 filed in the U.S. Court (District of Utah)
1. MOTION FOR DEFAULT W PROPOSED ORDER OF JUDGEMENT

2. ORDER OF DEFAULT JUDGEMENT (PROPOSED)


Those wishing to read the U.S. Federal Civil Rights Complaint may now do so here now as it is public information: Judy v. Obama 2014 U.S. FED Case No. 1:14cv00093


Update: Good article here on Obama's SS#

Sincerely
Cody Robert Judy

Wow!Just found my book, Taking A Stand, on sale at your local B&N for nook users if you prefer over soft or hard bound - only $8.49 That's a Great price



Cody Robert Judy
For U.S. President 2016

If you think “Truth” is worth it, support it and quit supporting the lie. That is the beginning of change, or we can just keep on going down this road and see where it leads with Obama. Which is it going to be?

TRUTH IS REAL


The Commercial is simply called "America"




Sunday, October 16, 2011

“A MALIGNANT CANCER FOSTERED BY OUR CONGRESS






Re: Article in the Post & Email

Saturday, October 15, 2011 at 9:16 PM
Dear Ann, BobSR, Chris, Steve T and Sharon:

You are the reason we have hope, my heart becomes determined and my faith increases because of the “heart” you all demonstrate. Steve T has excellent suggestions for Mr. Dummett, as far as collateral or indirect attacks. For example I have entered complaints with both the House and Senate Judicial Committees challenging
Guyana-born New York attorney Abdul Hassan who is seeking FEC approval as a candidate for President.

http://codyjudy.blogspot.com/2011/09/letter-to-schedule-meeting-with-r-lamar.html
My complaint revolves around the fact that if someone is not qualified how the MUDHOLE can the FEC allow them to raise funds from citizens on the basis of being a qualified candidate when they are in no way able to constitutionally qualify. Its like the FEC is encouraging fraud and a usurpation of the United States Constitution. Mind you this is a malignant organ of our Federal Government that has the ability to remove Obama from the ballot if we can get other FEC Candidates to complain and register their support for this endeavor it could help.

I wish Mr. Demmett all the luck as a candidate and hope he will take note from my actions in 2008 against McCain and Obama and realize depending upon a single Federal Court Judge to compromise Obama is politically speaking at least a 3-5 year process to the United States Supreme Court, which also takes a lot of time and money. I hope he can get in the GOP debates and work his way into the field. He does have to win the GOP nomination before he will get close to Obama.

While more Republican Citizens are behind the birther movement, they seem more willing to sleep with their candidates who are content to keep the issue under the carpet…however; I’m working on a secret project that may be a BIG SURPRISE to a lot of people that may or may not involve one major Republican Presidential Candidate that may with a concerted constitutional effort be seen as reaching across the isle with a match setting ablaze O’s White House for good.

This is the reason I ran as a Democrat, because I knew there would be no infiltration of the top R Candidates and the Media on the Eligibility Claim, Obama is not a natural born citizen! I have 50 possible shots at the State Caucuses and Primaries if people will get involved in their state. That’s much better odds than 1 General Election where Obama has raised just this quarter some 45 million that will dwarf even Mitt Romney’s and Rick Perry’s combined 30 million or so.

I believe firmly that any effort that does not have the eligibility clause firmly planted will not have the success the Republicans have placed their bets on because its a house of cards over our Country.

Of course the Post & Email will get the scoop first because I just love the Patriots involved with her. Yes, affectionately I called the P&E a ‘her’ because she reminds me of the Statue of Liberty, a place to blow the trumpet and hold the flame of liberty high.

God Bless You all- To all other we Birther Candidates are doing our best, but we do need your support and help financially. I’m determined to carry on and keep the campaign open, and your help will simply be put to commercials that will impact others to join our cause.

Its our Country, and our Constitution… its our Heart and Soul of America.

Cody Robert Judy
http://www.codyjudy.us
http://www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODE4PRES

Post Note:
The following article serves to demonstrates the need for immediate Congressional Investigations in the 2008 elections and the integrity of the FEC as a watchdog serving the general electorate.

http://articles.southbendtribune.com/2011-10-12/news/30269274_1_petitions-indiana-primary-ballot-voter-registration

This article also demonstrates the need we can all do as part of a patriot march through out this country to get petititons to place me on the ballot for a primary with Obama and the need for signatures to be legit, with phones, addresses, and signitures.

Everyone who is motivated in their state can begin this process at locations appropriately traveled by voters for our Country and Constitution.

Post Note 2
I'm sure that given the choice of facing removing Obama for scandals like 'fast & furious gunwalker' verses removing him for being ineligiable by our Constitution's standards, Congress would prefer the former.

Big Media Outlets Ignore Corruption

Any Attorney General who refuses to uphold the Constitution on our Commander-In-Chiefs qualification demands is certainly deserving of fast and furious justice sweeping down on him. A.G. Eric Holder, your a disgrace for protecting your corrupt boss. Get an honest job!