Monday, September 21, 2015



 of Presidential Candidate to cover OBAMA/CLINTON?

In a recent article Presidential Candidate and Dr. Ben Carson was excoriated for insinuating he did not think a Muslim was fit to be President Reported by Tamron Hall and Hallie Jackson reporting about their own  NBC's Chuck Todd in a Meet the Press interview with Dr. Carson. The controversial comment was stated to be another distraction for the GOP  Republican Party by NBC in the consideration of how much a Candidates Faith should matter to voters.  

The Press ran to the U.S. Constitution over the matter citing Article 6 "but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States". Dr Carson was insinuating He did not think Islam was consistent as a religion in America defined by the Constitution stating, "I would not advocate that we put a Muslim in charge of this Nation", but he also said voting for a Congressmen who was Muslim was different and tried to clarify his position stating what policies someone supports as the basis for his consideration.

We have hardly had break between Dr. Carson stating that Prison made people gay and his apology for that on the front cover of Time Magazine.

NBC's Chuck Todd continued with the near litmus test of the Media to GOP Candidates, "Do you believe President Obama was born in America and is a Christian?", which is near a contradiction of what the advocacy of the Constitution in Article Six states that it should not matter. So Why did it matter to Chuck Todd in the Order of asking Ben Carson about Barack Obama? Dr. Carson said he had no reason to disbelieve what Obama said.

So what has Obama said about the fact that he was a Muslim that contradicts what Mr. Carson says in that he had no reason to believe Obama was a Muslim? There seems really just as many reasons for Obama to be considered a Muslim as there is that he is considered a Christian by Obama's own words, registration of record in school, if you take all of his words as the truth.

 It is therefore easily understood that confusion exist when it comes to Obama by many including his notorious framing of the anti-Muslim video tape as the reasons inciting the terrorist attacks at Benghazi, and in the fact acting as the air-force support for the Muslim Brotherhood who took control of Libya after Omar Qaddafi was killed, Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, arming ISIS militants through Qatar and even now accused by Russia of supporting and arming radical ISIS or jihad fighters that has caused the horrendous immigrant problems cascading over the Nations of the world now.

In another Report -[The latest ISIS offensive has been made possible by a massive infusion of US weapons. Prime Minister Abadi admitted Monday that the Islamist captured some 2,300 armored Humvees- worth over one billion dollars - when it routed Iraqi security forces in Mosul nearly a year ago. In a Reuters column Tuesday in Iraq reported that, in addition 40 M1A2 main battle tanks as well as vast quantities of 'small arms and ammunition, including 74,000 machine guns, and as many as 52 M198 howitzer moil gun systems' fell into the hands of of Islamist militia.]

Chuck Todd insinuated again to Dr. Carson that a questioner to Mr. Donald Trump advocated Obama was not a Christian but was a Muslim, and it seems if we take into considerations 'policies advocated' by Mr. Carson as consideration, more truth exist if we consider the support the Obama Administration has given to Muslims in the Arab Springs diabolical divide and conquer strategy set up to ultimately arm Muslims of both Sunni and Shia extremes divided over Muhammad's successor : being his father-in-law (Sunni) or son-in-law (shia) respectively.

One question to consider- is the the media itself trying to advocate Constitutional Principles or just simply acting in a division in order to conquer? Does or is the media representing to the Public the great constitutional character of the Democratic Party by illustrating the GOP as unconstitutional when it comes to religion by showcasing exhibits of Trump and Carson but denying or not showcasing what is going on at the exact same time by the DNC in their own Party and battle of Presidential Candidates? 

Is there any contribution by the DNC of this 'slander of religion' or are they perfect in upholding a standard American's would be proud of? Is there a use or contribution by the DNC to frame the religion of a candidate just as harshly as the Media portrays the GOP of doing under leading Candidates Trump and Carson which might also be orchestrated as a fix in the competition considerations of Hillary Clinton, and even the present considerations currently in the U.S. Supreme Court case Judy v. Obama 14-9396 calling for damages upon the Campaigns of '08 and '12 suffered as a result of Obama not adhering to the qualifications insisted upon by the 'natural born Citizen' clause for the Office of the President?


Consider this as every bit as a controversial distraction upon the DNC in the competition between Candidate Hillary Clinton and Cody Robert Judy and the use of "disparaging 'religion" as a political tool by the left. 

Declared 2016 Democratic Presidential Candidate
Business Owner
Declared Democratic 2016 Candidate Cody Robert Judy
Cody Judy is the next great prophet of the Mormon church – in his opinion. He made a bomb threat related to that conviction and has served time in prison for it. Politically, he's a hardcore conservative who calls for minefields along the Mexican border, though he's running as a Democrat.

Contact Information
Democratic National Committee
430 S. Capitol St. SE
Washington, DC 20003
Phone: (202) 863-8000

Republican National Committee
310 First Street SE
Washington, DC 20003
Phone: 202-863-8700
Fax: 202-863-8820

When pressing the More on Cody Robert Judy the following appears:

[Cody Robert Judy lives in Ogden, Utah. He attended and graduated from Utah State University, with a degree in Psychology. Little information is available on his employment history, but he currently owns his own business.

Judy is a former Mormon, but has been officially excommunicated from the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (the Mormon church) for apostasy. In 1993, holding a nondescript briefcase, he ascended uninvited to a Marriot Center stage where Howard W. Hunter, President of the Council of the Twelve of the LDS church, addressed an assembled crowd. Official accounts (including eyewitness reports) state that Judy then proceeded to threaten Hunter by claiming he had a bomb in his briefcase and that he would detonate it if Hunter did not flee the building. Several audience members and at least two security guards intervened, physically subduing Judy until police could be summoned. Judy pleaded guilty to Aggravated Burglary, saying he had committed the crime because God told him he was to be the next prophet of the LDS church. He denies that any actual bomb threat was made, explaining that he merely referred aloud to the Book of Mormon (a holy text of Mormonism, considered by that faith to be part of the Holy Bible) by phonetically pronouncing its initials, BOM, which was misunderstood to the alarm of many. Records disagree with his account, but he contends that the official contradiction of his story was unfairly entered against him by a Mormon judge and perpetuated by Mormon newspapers, all seeking to discredit him. Three doctors who examined Judy testified that he suffered from a delusional disorder, but that he rationally understood the charges against him, and he was ruled competent to enter his guilty plea. He served eight years in prison.

Despite his running as a Democrat, Judy has no love for the nation's President. He has spoken out against Barack Obama on the (thoroughly disproven) grounds that Obama is not a natural-born American citizen and is thus ineligible to occupy the White House. He has sued President Obama for this reason, and in fact has done the same to Republican Senator and former presidential contender John McCain, on the same basis.

Judy is a generally conservative candidate. He vigorously opposes illegal immigration, calling for the implementation of minefields and high-beam cutting laser fences along the southern border with only legitimate points of entry remaining safe. He categorically rejects amnesty for immigrants already present illegally, and says the immigration system should be strengthened to welcome people legally. He also supports increasing domestic production of energy using fossil fuels, while funding research into more diverse energy sources and the cleaner use of traditional sources. On the issue of healthcare, he advocates for the use of deregulation and tax cuts to enable the population to afford medical treatment under a free market.

With policies decidedly far to the right of the political spectrum, it is ironic that Judy is likely to find his most vehement support among the Republican Tea Party, as he himself seeks the Democratic nomination. His criminal past, however, risks making him into an unacceptable choice for a majority of American voters. 


The tug-of-war between the  DNC  Editorial Department writing the "Candidate Profiles" and Cody Robert Judy are certain. Objections by Cody Robert Judy in the detailed correspondence with the web site editorial staff can be viewed in greater detail on this CRJ Post Why Democrats are terrified to debate August 22nd, 2015. The distraction can be seen as a dispute of the facts of the case. Contrasting the DNC's editorial recommendations Cody submitted evidence and testimony that would consider the following to be true:

Cody Robert Judy, with no juvenile or prior criminal record whatsoever, 22 years ago court records reveal, was framed by LDS Church Leaders cooperating with the then LDS Bishop serving as District Court Judge of the Church/State. Frames of the video tape were released to the Press of the Incident. It seems the illegal union of church and state authority lied on their part in a plea-bargain to wash the whole thing down the tube with '6 months time served'. Court Records show Cody's Motion to withdraw his guilty plea three days later after the nefarious trap was understood were denied. He served 8 years in prison with 5 Rehearings. Many attempts were made to obtain the evidence of the video tape of the Marriott Center Incident. KTVX Channel 4  with their own lawyers spent $10K to obtain the video-tape they acclimated would make LDS Church Leaders heroes if nothing was amiss. Many witnesses attesting to what is referred to as a mob of upwards of 50 beating Mr. Judy after it was understood no threat existed, while the Church refused the evidence to Mr. Judy on his Appeals. Mr. Judy refused by his Criminal Court Judge/LDS Bishop the evidence, was forced to take the LDS Presidency to Court who maintained Copyright of the Videotape, and appealed clear to the U.S. Supreme Court in Civil Case No. 96-7655. The U.S. Supreme Court ultimately ruled 'not enough people suffered [n]ot getting evidence used against them' to hear the Civil Law Case.

Then Mr Judy advocated to the DNC Editorial web site:

[You might actually dis-guard the 'religious mess' altogether if you were to consider simply sticking to the details of Mr. Judy's political experience more might find relevant then a 22 year old case?

Mr. Judy's experience in the Political Fields includes a 2002 bid for 1st Congressional District of Utah where he was featured on The Daily Show with Jon Stewart.

He ran for U.S. Senate as a Democrat in 2004 and 2010 challenging the incumbent Republican Robert Bennett. In 2008 Mr. Judy ran as a write-in Candidate for President challenging Sen. McCain as eligible because he was not born in the U.S. serving the Federal Law Suit to McCain and the RNC 3 days before McCain was made the nominee. He included Sen. Obama in an Emergency Motion also before the election of 2008. The judge ruled the case was moot after delaying Judgement until after the 2008 Election saying Obama had won and McCain was a moot candidate to the qualifications.

In 2012 Mr. Judy began exhausting State Remedies before any of the Primaries or Caucuses. He started with executive branch Ballot Challenges in New Hampshire and Georgia which eventually were appealed into the Judicial Branches and worked up to each States Supreme Court ultimately leading to his first U.S. Supreme Court Case Judy v. Obama 12-5276.

Mr. Judy continued with a Review in 2013 rejected by the U.S. Supreme Court, but remember this was of State Remedy Ballot Challenges. In July 2014 Mr. Judy filed a Federal Law Suit in the District of Utah, appealed to the 10th Circuit in Denver, and is now in the U.S. Supreme Court with a second Conference scheduled Sept. 28th, 2015.


To contrast this we bring in their version of Hillary Clinton's profile:

Declared 2016 Democratic Presidential Candidate
Former U.S. Secretary of State, U.S. Senator and First Lady
Declared 2016 Democratic Presidential Candidate Hillary Clinton
Others' names have been spoken, but Hillary Rodham Clinton is still the current frontrunner for the Democratic nomination in 2016. As she takes her place in the public spotlight, it appears she's assumed the role, for her party and in history.

[Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton is a woman who needs no lengthy introduction. Originally from Chicago, Illinois, she attended Wellesley College for a degree in Political Science, then went on to Yale Law School. It was during her schooling at Yale that she met her now-current husband and then-future President of the US, Bill Clinton. Although she was raised Republican and held to a right-wing political ideology for most of her academic career, she would ultimately change her views, and today has amassed an impressive resume of political accomplishments as a decidedly leftist liberal Democrat. This history – which includes her passive roles as First Lady of Arkansas and then of the United States, as well as active positions such as her two terms as a Senator for the state of New York and four years as US Secretary of State under President Obama – has led her to the present when, now a declared candidate for the Democratic Presidential nomination in 2016, she is easily the favorite in her party.

Clinton is well-known and generally liked amongst a large percentage of the American citizenry. With a serious chance at becoming the first female President in the nation's history, she has carefully nurtured her image for decades, with some believing she began planning an eventual White House run during her days as her husband's First Lady – if not earlier. Her intense preoccupation with always presenting herself favorably to the public (and, perhaps more cynically, her skill at playing the game of politics) has sometimes led her to bouts of questionable sincerity. 

Hillary Clinton announces 2016 presidential bid
For instance, she is known to have claimed that her parents named her in honor of Sir Edmund Hillary, an intrepid mountaineer famous for leading the first expedition to successfully climb Mount Everest. In reality, Edmund's life-defining accomplishment took place in 1953; while alive, he was unknown in 1947, when Hillary Clinton was born and presumably named.

In what had come to be regarded by many as a mere – but important – formality, Clinton officially announced her candidacy for President on April 12th, 2015. Now that she has declared, barring some major upset in American politics, she will almost certainly receive the Democratic presidential nomination. With her vast popularity across many sectors of the American electorate, especially among female voters, Clinton promises to be a formidable opponent for any prospective Republican challenger. Though she once enjoyed double-digit leads over some of the GOP's biggest names (numbers which have since ebbed), she still wields even standing to slight advantages over the best the Republican party has to offer. Of course, with a Democratic President on his way out in the 2016 elections and tides favoring Republicans, there are no sure bets, but any serious GOP contender would do well to train for battle against Hillary Clinton.]

Is there any mention of Hillary's Scandals? Any mention of Benghazi and the video tape she claimed was the reason for it happening when its' been proven that wasn't the case? Any mention of the gun-shot wound to the mouth of Vince Foster her law partner in Whitewater?Any mention of Email Gate? How about the pay-to-play scandal or any of the other 22 Scandals that are a lot more recent then 22 years ago in Hillary Clinton's DNC editorial review?

There's only a mention of her exaggerating where her name came from. We are lead to believe in her Candidate Profile, she has never even double dipped her potato-chip whilst in Mr. Judy's Profile rather than a "warning from God" traditionally acting as the love of God for those astray in Christian theology, in calls for repentance for those in the galls of bitter hypocrisy, as many also believe the Mormon Church Leaders, Mr. Judy was? What? Acting in accordance to his religious conscience as a member of an organization?

We don't even know anything else. He asked for no money, he asked for no demands but to have the Church leadership read an apology for treating him rudely which they are on record as having done refusing to see him the week before in a visit. For this they throw him in prison for a longer time than most cases of sever and habitual criminals?

Under the near same 10 minute circumstances of interruption Jorge Ramos interrupting Donald Trump would be doing 8 years in prison instead of being escorted out and let back in. Of course in a Church Meeting a greater latitude of freedom of speech is considered owning to the symbolism and allegories of parables so often used in religions. ie. The Rock referring to Peter. The Lamb referring to Jesus Christ. The Holy Ghost not meant as a demonized scary ghost and proper interpretation comes from being in perfect harmony with the Spirit which takes away fear, perceives truth, and interprets correctly. These of course to the true nature of the facts. 

This has got to be one of the greatest reasons America is so dog-gone-sick-and-tired of the Establishment ring leaders of both parties and why a record 42% of Americans now identify as Independents and its the fastest growing political movement in American now overtaking the population of Republicans and Democrats.

 It certainly explains why Mr. Trump, Mr. Carson, and Mrs, Fiorina who have never been elected before are indeed in the drivers seats of the GOP as Republicans are in a rebellion against the establishment. It certainly explains why a grumpy old Bernie Sanders with white wild hair considered an Independent from the ruling Democratic Party Establishment is the new Democratic Party front runner.

Americans can see right through the false reflections of the Media slashing and burning candidates over on the GOP side, and setting up little darlings on the DNC side like Obama who is not a 'natural born Citizen' ie born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents. The exact same thing is occurring on both and its brought to us by the Establishment of both Parties. Americans are sick to death of pretending the Constitution does matter and then when it comes to this Candidate it doesn't matter. 


One of the biggest discouragement's I see especially within the 'Conservative' Crowd is spotlighted in my Feature-Comment-of-the-Day referring to the U.S. Supreme Court as 'Stacked' against Conservatives. To that I disagree. What assumption does anyone really have that the liberal side of the Court is not just as dismayed at the likes of Cruz, Rubio, Jindal, McCain, who also are not 'natural born Citizens' ie. 'Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents?

The natural born Citizen clause of the Constitution found in Article II, Section I, Clause 5 as it pertains to the Office of the President is definitely not included in the aliens and national descriptions of Title 8 and was not made 'moot' by the 14th Amendment. While the Media might be asking was Obama born in the U.S. and is he a Christian, that is not the question the Court will be asking as it concerns the Constitution. We know there is no religious litmus test for any office in the Constitution, what is striking is that there is any question that 'natural born Citizen' is only granted in a second generation of Americans "Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents' and that can just as easily be lost if the time is interrupted by a foreign birth, or a foreign parent. Those do not remove 'Citizenship', but they can remove 'natural born Citizenship'. Let us not forget in the qualifications of the Office of the President it was Citizen at the time of the Adoption of the Constitution, and 'natural born Citizen' thereafter. 

Why doesn't Chuck Todd from Meet The Press find a new 'Gotcha Question' like, "Do you think Obama is a 'natural born Citizen'? The answer is "NO!, and neither is Cruz, Rubio, Jindal or McCain" This is the center of our Constitution folks it has got to matter to you and as bad as serving 8 years in prison might seem to you, you have got to ask yourself the question: Why is Cody Robert Judy the only Presidential Candidate in American with a bi-partisan Federal Court Record standing up for the Core of our Constitution? Let's not forget, Jesus was considered a 'male-factor' by many of the Jews of his day.

We are reminded again only seven (7) days until the United States Supreme Court undertakes on September 28th, 2015 the Case Judy v. Obama 14-9396. Cody Robert Judy is CALLING ALL PATRIOTS and asking for their help in the preparation that is needed to support this Constitutional Defense. The United States Supreme Court needs to be the Supreme Court for the 46% of America also, and not just the smaller establishments of the 31% Democrats and 25% Republicans.

As a Final Thought let me say Americans are concerned. Owning the last 25 terrorist attacks in/on the USA it is difficult not to place radical Islamist Muslims as a common factor woven between them, though in comparison to the ratio of peacefully practicing religious people these are less concerning than car accidents.

It is the nature of many people to hold an animosity of different Faiths than they themselves hold. I believe that Dr. Carson understood that no religious litmus test should exist for any office defined in the Constitution, but like many policies that come in a general sweep of the entire population, mass punishment can be a very bad to entertain as a warrant.

Let us not forget it is the same road that would insist the entire America People be disarmed as a result of gun- violence. We have to be very careful, in treading upon a 'general policy', motivated by individuals that can and are held to account in our Criminal Justice System.

Thank You! 
Please, consider a Contribution Now by clicking the secure Paypal link. You contribution Today will help make a Better America Tomorrow!

Cody Robert Judy

Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.
Web Site 

Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!

Cody Robert Judy's book :

Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.

1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.

INSPIRING - I believe in You


No comments:

Post a Comment