Tuesday, January 12, 2016




Between 1765 and 1783 a Revolution took place that parted the British Crown from the United States of America. The strangest thing that has ever occurred is that while America opened her arms to Immigrants for a new nation, a new Race of People known as Americans was also born. Traitors and Tyrants have never stopped trying to tear the heart of this great Nation apart, and at the heart of the new Jurisdiction of the United States of America was the U.S. Constitution and at its nucleus was the Office of President. 
 Today I reflected over the last 7 years and the severe losses that have been incurred on all Birthers. They have been mocked,ridiculed, disenfranchised, disparaged, and paid the smallest sum of gratitude imaginable by the Courts of Law and the Main Stream Media and what for? Defending the Country? What an honor it has been for me to fight the good civil fight with them. We have been a minority, but truly as reflected in Polls of 2011,  4 in 10 voters, nearly 50% of the Country, was rooting for Birthers. 
Basically the charge revolves around their defense and barrier of an American Race.. a New Nation. For whatever reason motivates those who have done the barking, growling, and pounding of chest against them, the simple fact is that the exposure of anti-birthers is more anti-american than American.
For those who have pounded the sand for America a real struggle and real fight was felt for survival. If you managed to become a Citizen you know the struggle was real. If you manged to have children here in a second generation, you knew there was no other Country to call home. This was your tribe, your Country, your Land, and there was no going back.
For those who paid the dues for two generations the qualification for the Highest Office in the Land was an  incentive, a positive reward for the distinguished honor of being All American. I'd like to present a comment I made on ObamaConspiracy.org Post because it strikes at the heart of what we as Birthers have been defending. 

@Doc [I was reminded of a scene from my favorite movie, “The Hunt for Red October.” ]
You know I trained a Jumper for John McTiernan real nice Palamino. He was the Producer of Hunt For Red October.
[The Minor Court went on to look for a definition in the English Common Law]
When ever the closeness of English Law and American Law are nestled together the axiom of similarities between the Gorilla and the Horse come to mind.
Yes it's True. They are both animals. However in the context and contrast of [ natural born Subject] v. [natural born Citizen] I cannot imagine not noticing the differences much more than the similarities.
The preposterous similarities used are seen near infirm with a very simple question:
Did natural born Subjects in their state understood by the esteemed King of the Crown 👑 ever assume the passage guaranteed to them, to the Thrown, by Election, as part of the "rights and privileges"?
The answer is not only NO, but HELL NO!
Right to own property and claim on defense, as well as pay yr taxes was more to the flexibility of [natural born Subject] than someday becoming King, and to say otherwise is infirm.
Thus, on the subject of POTUS v. KING to similarize [natural born Subject] and [ natural born Citizen] is to recognize the similarities of the Gorilla and the Horse. Why do it when the differences so far out way similarities?
Twas Blackstone that railed upon Anchor Babies when he said, " Where no Protection can be Claimed, no Allegiance can be Due"
Twas also Blackstone that said in affect, "The place of Birth is Singular" and "No two places of allegiances can be had, for you can't serve two masters at Once"
There is no doubt Blackstone influenced common law in English Speaking countries.
But On the subject of [ natural born Citizen] it seems Emerich de Vattel in 1758. In book one chapter 19,
§ 212. [Of the citizens and natives] hits The Trust of POTUS writing [The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. ]
This seems much more cognitive of the differences of KING and POTUS in context.
It is by Statute -Title 8 Aliens and Citizens at Birth §1401 a-h that those naturalized favored foreigners find [Citizen] status as is properly cited.
The confirmation of [natural born Citizen] in Title 8 ACT is withheld, and [natural born Citizen] was stripped in 1795 from 1790 in what has to be acknowledged as a hiccup rather than Original Intent.
The 1803 recognition in Congress of [ natural born Citizen] is touted a [Happy Barrier] against foreign influence.
Now, what happy barrier is consistent with [foreign influence] if foreigners crossing the border the moment of Birth are allowed qualified for the Office of President (Rubio), as also a Foreign Ambassador's children presuming allegiance against their father and mother born in a foreign state like The United States of America or Canada (Cruz) ?
Of course American Law has adopted in naturalization statutes these naturalized favored foreigners at Birth accept the Office of President. This is based on a matter of Time, for their children born here are able and Qualified for that Office.
The Qualification of natural born Citizen is about TIME and the preservation of a unique American Culture that neutralizes things like.. Oh say Radical Jihadist into a more acceptable tolerance of a multiple religions state as an example.
Madison did recognize the influence of both Place and Parents and Smith's example of not filling 7 yrs residency is poor fodder in the 2 Generations of Time for the Office of President in the Term born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents for [natural born Citizen]
This is why to write: @Doc [It is a reasonable transition, not violating original intent, that these current statues govern who is a citizen from birth, and hence a natural-born citizen.] is a conundrum.
Statutes are naturalization strategies for taxes, land, and Civil Rights for Citizens, not a Determination of lowering the Time Period required for [natural born Citizen][ship] status required for the a office of President and VP.
Yes, I am an American Racist which is to say a racist for the plurality of races and cultures poured together , the result of two generations exhibiting a purity worthy of distinguishment and the qualification of the Office of President.
Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents
That's American
End Comment

Serving Americans now through a Civil Appeal process verses waiting for Election Civil War. What makes more sense to you? That is what Judy v. Obama 14-9396 has offered, and why it is understood that the DENIAL of a Motion for Forma Pauperis by the U.S. Supreme Court was arbitrary.

BIRTHER Pie-In-The-Sky U.S. Supreme Court 

The Challenge was issued on Cody Robert Judy's Twitter Account and sent to several Major Media Outlets.

Thank You!

Cody Robert Judy Campaign

Cody Robert Judy

Cody Robert Judy

Cody Robert Judy
Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.
Web Site www.codyjudy.us

We want to thank you for the 330,000 views on this Blog!

Keep coming back!

Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!

Cody Robert Judy's book :

Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.

1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.

No comments:

Post a Comment