Wednesday, November 30, 2016


Altered or Alternative
Democrats face void of Truth

One thing that Democrats might be good at and that's "making labels up" for Americans- Birthers- Truthers- Alt-Media- Deplorables to name just a few. In fact, Truther had it's originating base line copied for the term Birther, even though more than half of Democrats believed Bush was complicit in 9/11. The lost defense of TRUTH hit Hillary Rodham Clinton hard in the 2016 Election. The good thing about that was the showing for all Americans that Truth still has value after all it was indeed Obama who waited three years before handing out his long form birth certificate and it was more than half of Republicans who didn't believe Obama was ever born in the U.S. or qualified as a [natural born Citizen] ie. born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents. 

Alt-Media was a term Hillary Clinton made famous in her Presidential Campaign speech, but what it really signified was Media the Democrats couldn't control affecting the Altered-Media the Democrats force-fed as controlled Mainstream Media. So if Altered Media and Alternative Media are confusing to you, let's explore the MVP of Altered Media -Obama and understand the Alternative Media only became alternative because the Altered Media was throwing good apples out behind the barn with the rest of the horse biscuits and calling it Horse Sh*t which confused many people with no experience as a stall boy.

As a former professional horsemen and the son of Farmers with all kinds of animals in the barn, I have had a lot of experience with cleaning out stalls. To save sawdust my Mom used to engage us in "picking up the horse biscuits with our hands because a pitch-fork took out too much sawdust with the waste. The key in that process was getting to the mess before it was strewn around to much. We cleaned stalls every day and we took pride in a clean barn. Another way you might say that which we heard quite a bit about in the Presidential Campaign Crowds of President Elect Donald J. Trump was 'draining the swamp'. 'Draining the swamp', 'cleaning the stalls'-  it all has to do with a fresh clean slate to lay down in and be comfortable without smelling the stench so bad that you pass out, lose interest, walk away, or don't vote.

Democrats today are voting for a Speaker of the House. A position Rep. Nancy Pelosi has held for 14 years- eight of which have been presiding over losing 1,000 seats across the Country to Republicans. Still Democrats laud her ability to "Raise Money". Well, if raising money was about winning, she's proved to us the two do not go hand-in-hand. 

If raising money was her gift to Democrats why would she stop raising money for Democrats if she lost the Speaker-ship? If she stopped raising money on the basis of her position, couldn't the money she is raising in her position just be called blackmail/extortion money anyway? Thus Democrats should theoretically not worry about the money Rep. Nancy Pelosi has raised, it should come in anyway if it's the Democratic Party Platform that counts right?

Of course Rep. Nancy Pelosi has hung on to her gavel with 134 votes, but it also came with a price tag - fewer coronations and more reality checks in the interest of young Democrats noticed as hung out to dry in the leadership pariah-of-the-clan that gathering opposition steam represented by a surprising 63 votes! 

Represenative Nancy Pelosi indeed may have raised some good money for the Democratic Party, but Republican Establishment favorite Jeb Bush blew through a 100M and Democratic Establishment favorite Hillary Rodham Clinton blew through a Billion with identity politics as the small rudder navigating a large ship that has lost its way in bedrock values such as fairness, equality,  and opportunity for quite some time now

[..the majority of Americans live in states in which there are Republican trifectas or veto-proof legislative majorities. Two-thirds of the nation’s governors are Republicans; more than two-thirds of our state legislative houses are under Republican control. Republicans control both houses of Congress and have just won the presidency.]
Still the Democrats persist money is the key to winning and Obama is on a tangent about alternative media which sounds a little more like a Defacto President who is decrying freedom of speech - one of those staples we all know he defends? The problem for the Democrats is presented as a conundrum represented in the picture of this Post.

Obama installed as a usurper of the U.S. Constitution cannot possibly be it's defender. He is and never was qualified for the Office of the President demanding in the Qualification section a natural born Citizen ie. born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents. 

Obama is as legal in the Office of the President as Jack-a-lopes bound the prairies of the United States. They normally don't have horns and abnormally do.  Rabbits with horns don't exist and neither does a legal Constitutional Qualified President in Barack Obama. It has only been the Altered Media that has thought so fabricating , just as Obama's long form birth certificate was fabricated and proven such by a law enforcement investigation, suppressed by the MSM, Congress, and the Courts.

On one hand Obama understands that without the U.S. Constitution minorities like Muslims [insert any religion]Americans, Irananian-Americans, Turkish Americans, Mexican-Americans, and every other [ [insert foreign state-Americans], male[insert sex]-Americans are not subject to fairness, equality, and opportunity, and the Democratic Party has been a big champion for minorities. They have counted on that vote, but haven't done much less of standing up for American-Americans. 

In their desire to help and assist minorities there begin to be a real hateful disparaging discrimination against American-Americans- ie. The natural born Citizens [born in the U.S. to Citizen parents]. They turned blindly against the foundation of propagated Americans that was not dependent upon the 14th Amendment or any other naturalization act of Congress that the Office of the President was reserved for exempting only those born at the time of the Adoption of the U.S. Constitution. American-Americans felt that and spoke out about it in the 2016 Election. President Elect Donald J. Trump saw the opening plain as day and Obama had no answer accept an attempt to pacify with this fabricated long form birth certificate certified by his mother's friend Loretta Fuddy, now deceased, at the Hawaii Health Department and his childhood friend as Governor. 

In the conundrum of the Post Picture, Obama laments that if we didn't have the Constitution, including the Electoral College System held within it, Democrats would have won the Election. So, you have an unqualified candidate in Obama who is a walking talking violation of the Constitution that Democrats are supposed to defend, lamenting that, gosh, if we didn't have the Constitution's Electoral College , Democrats would be winning. 

No they wouldn't. 

Because most Democrats are minorities and depend upon the U.S. Constitution for a defense. This presents a big problem for Democrats. Defend Obama or Defend Minorities but you can't do both or you lose. That's a real truth. Democrats will never gain any kind of high ground until they acknowledge Truth. Obama is not Qualified under the same Constitution that is the Supreme Law of the Land and is represented as the Republic for which we stand. Maybe Democrats feel the Pledge of Allegiance is out-dated too and they would prefer a message from 'Anonymous' for our elementary school children to the Pledge that protects minorities with "Justice for All" Citizens under the Constitution? 

Democracy in it's purest form is the bully of the crowd trampling the rights of the minorities. Minorities need to be very afraid of that for good reason. They will lose their rights and privileges to a pure Democracy. They are clearly outnumbered and shouldn't forget it. That should make them the biggest defenders of the U.S. Constitution and the biggest opponents of Barack Obama. I understand it as a Democratic Candidate for President in 2012 and 2016, but do you think Rep. Nancy Pelosi gets it?

No she doesn't. 

If Obama was a painting Nancy Pelosi was the brush stroking the canvas. She was included in two different forms signing off to the States he was Constitutionally Eligible in U.S. Supreme Court Case Judy v. Obama No. 14-9396. She lied and its cost Democrats over the last eight years much more money than Rep. Nancy Pelosi ever raised for the Party. The Democratic Party swerved left for a fast gain and now has hit the wall against Americans they put up themselves. They turned their back on the Law, but in their defense it took a lot of complacent Establishment Republicans including Mitt Romney also decried by President Elect Trump a big loser.


In opposition to an editorial run in the Miami Harold I made the following comment based mostly in the fact that there is a lot of truth hanging in the balance of the MSM and Journalist of the Altered Media that somehow the Constitution's Qualifications for Office are Racist ( also clearly defended in another Editorial here ) which only firms up the discrimination against American-Americans leaving the hole exposed by Democrats that lost the 2016 Election. The Altered Media is the MSM in it's delusion. Americans are getting it!

The author no doubt has fallen for the gas depicting himself as the “Elitist” He no doubt has called the Constitution’s Qualifications as a tail of the horse the 5th leg.
We American-Americans or [ natural born Citizens] know different.
It’s despicable that he’d throw an apple in the pile of muck behind the barn and call the apple Horse Sh*t!
[ The people who insist that President Obama is not a native-born American deny they are racists. Yes they are.] The Qualification for President is [ natural born Citizen] ie. Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents- not native born citizen idiot!

[One of my favorite Abraham Lincoln stories relates his encounter with an elitist lawyer who, during a trial, dismissed him as a rustic bumpkin. Lincoln posed him a simple riddle. “If we call a tail a leg, how many legs does a horse have?’ The smug lawyer replied, “Five.” Lincoln corrected him. “No, he still has four legs, because calling a tail a leg does not make it one.”
People are free to engage in self-delusion if they wish, but if it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck and swims like a duck, it is a duck, and these comments are racist. But perhaps these bigots should heed the poet Robert Burns’ advice in the poem “To A Louse.”
‘O would some power the gift give us to see ourselves as others see us.’]

Oh why can't he see himself as he is? Is he a Stupid Idiot or is he the bowling ball wrecking Dems?

If American-Americans can't even have one office reserved for them in their own land and instead feel the dragons breath of the MSM, what incentive is there? Well, clearly the American-Americans heard that call and felt the fire of being called another name made up by Hillary Clinton "Deplorables". 

The facts that the MSM have altered, their participating General Public perception, is as evident as the General Public not hearing about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 from the inception of it being filed in Utah's Federal Court system to the U.S. Supreme Court but the opposite happening in the Same-Sex Court Cases. There have hundreds of Press Releases they have "sat on" in participation of the cover up. That is what 'altering media' is. It's altered the Public Perception of Truth - which was in fact the U.S. Constitution's Qualification.

As another example, the cover-up that Hillary Clinton avoided FOIA with her Email Set Up was also altered as a "Convenience". Avoiding FOIA is a crime for a Government Official especially against The American People.  Convenience had less to do with it than avoiding accountability and responsibility to the Law, but the laws that most applied were not the ones the FBI held her accountable too. 

If Truth prevailed with the MSM regarding [Birthers], they would understand the two part qualification of soil and parents with [natural born Citizen] and that it has nothing to do with [religion] which they would like to present as a  narrative of bigotry. This is false also. The Qualification for President in the Constitution of the United States has no religious test.
The truth is Obama was enrolled in a Muslim only elementary school in Indonesia and was registered in it as a Muslim by the name of Barry Soetoro. 

  Of course people in the U.S. are free to change their Religions and the fact that he was registered Muslim has little to do with his present religion and that has less to do with any qualification required by the U.S. Constitution. His recorded foreign adoption might however in legal theory and has some merit in truth as far as his mother's inherited citizenship to him. 

If a traitor to the U.S. gives up their U.S. Citizenship for a foreign citizenship, being a U.S. Citizen no longer applies. Anwar al Awlaki born in the State of New Mexico to foreign nationals of Yemen held dual citizenship America and with Yemen and Obama sent a drone over to kill him.

In the respect Obama is not qualified for U.S. President neither was Anwar al Awlaki, yet both may have run for Representative or Senator which only requires [Citizen] and is included in the naturalization act Title 8 subsection 1401, a-h. Obama like Anwar has an inherited citizenship from Kenya from his father. The place of Anwar's birth made little difference to his inheriting citizenship to Yemen through both his Parents. 

If the Birther issue was 'racist', how did (Caucasian) McCain, Cuban Rubio/ Cruz and Indonesian Jindal get on the SCOTUS Record of my presidential petition and claim to the U.S. Supreme Court? And Why has the media hidden those aspects away in participation in the cover up to the General Public unless they are participating in a cover up of altered media?

The U.S. Supreme Court denied me a Hearing based on not having the funds to pay when my poverty condition was in fact accepted in lower courts as well was given to them in official record. This amounted to a #waronpoor and against Justice for All. How do Democrats feel about equality and fairness in a Presidential Race? Well, their treatment for Presidential Candidate Bernie Sanders is documented, but let's not forget my Campaign or for that matter President Elect Donald J. Trump's who has never held Public Office Dems. 

The jury may still be out on whether money trumps truth or wither truth can save Democrats and MLK Jr. seemed to agree stating:
The truth of these words is beyond doubt, but the mission to which they call us is a most difficult one. 


There will be one more National Presser from Sheriff Joe and the Cold Case Possee December 15th, 2016.


Cody Robert Judy was the only Presidential Candidate in America to have a bi- Partisan Federal Court Record taking a stand for the [ natural born Citizen] Qualification for U.S. President in three runs for President 2008, 2012, and 2016.

 See: Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, NV.
U.S. Supreme Court Judy v. Obama 12-5276 &14-9396.

Thank You!

Cody Robert Judy Campaign
Cody Robert Judy

Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.
Cody Robert Judy


No comments:

Post a Comment