Showing posts with label Clinton Global Initiative. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Clinton Global Initiative. Show all posts

Monday, March 28, 2016

BREAKING NEWS: CLINTON CIRCUS - Why? Hillary Clinton Clowns are Coming Around


BREAKING NEWS: 
FEATURED EDITORIAL The Post & Email
CLINTON CIRCUS - Why? 
Hillary Clinton Clowns Coming Around
INTERROGATIONS may Clown the FBI

Federal Prosecutors are deposing Clinton and her aides in the outline of building a criminal case where testimonies and questioning under oath could be used to indict her and her aides in the breach of National Security secrets in her tenure as Secretary of State.

The Criminal Code type interrogations will help  Federal Prosecutors better understand whether Clinton or her aides either  [knowingly or negligently] discussed classified government secrets over a non-secure email system when she served as secretary of State.

Both [negligence and knowingly] can be prosecuted criminally and could warrant JUSTICE Department indictments that could tailspin Hillary Clinton's Presidential Campaign into a full blown crashing course of catastrophe.

LEGAL experts acknowledge Hillary Clinton warned her staff against conducting official business with their personal email accounts which makes very clear the double standard Clinton herself was doing that she advocated others not to do.

Clinton herself acknowledged a regrettable mistake and lapse of judgement in the face that the FBI confiscated her server after she and her aides deleted some 30,000 Emails she deemed personal and private that the FBI Criminal Forensic Department Unit have now Recovered.

Of those 30,000 Clinton did turn over 2000 plus have been redacted by Classification as national intelligence that can not be disclosed to the United States Public based on degrees of classification ranging from the greatest level of Top Secret to the lower levels of Classification.

Of course it goes without saying anything deemed to risky to divulge to the American Public the FBI would cry out shuddering to have made known to Foreign Intelligence Agencies or known enemies of the United States in acts of espionage by traitorous employees of the United States.

As the top most Senior FOREIGN Intelligence Officer the Secretary of State receives special training on how to classify intelligence and how to recognize it. Hillary Clinton also signed a statement acknowledging prosecution of criminal conduct in a strict degree of violation that would result in any breach of negligence or knowingly placing National Security secrets at risk to unauthorized individuals or governments.

[U.S. law makes it a crime for someone to knowingly or willfully retain classified information, handle it in a grossly negligent manner or to pass it to someone not entitled to see it.]


Her attorney, David Kendall, has been stunned into silence in commenting on her behalf as also have [Lawyers for her closest aides – Huma Abedin, Jake Sullivan, Cheryl Mills and Philippe Renes – remaining silent and declining comment on behalf of their clients.]

Her campaign spokesman, Brian Fallon, admitted Hillary Clinton has no choice but to cooperate with investigators picking up the investigation by interrogation of the possible criminal defendants, Hillary herself could be included with,  in what would be the greatest espionage case in U.S. History in the blatant format to avoid accountability of Government to the People of the United States through the FOIA -Freedom of Information Act.

The L.A. Times Reports 
http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-clinton-email-probe-20160327-story.html

The interrogations [also are an indication that much of the investigators' background work – [recovering deleted emails], understanding how the server operated and determining whether it was breached – is nearing completion.] emphasis added.

Much of the national press in the U.S. are also stunned that the Secretary of State received so many huge speaking fees from so many Foreign Governments after she left the Job for hundreds of thousands of dollars each totally between her and Bill 26 Million Dollars in 26 Months.

 It's almost unbelievable as it's exposed in this 3 minute video beginning at 2min:12seconds Clinton's FOREIGN and DOMESTIC Speech Tour and the hundreds of thousands collected for each speech is outlined.

 https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=iQmh-tf0Vfo

The list of speeches made by the Clinton's is here. The problem really occurs with Hillary Clinton resigning her Post as Secretary of State, hopping on this lucrative speaking Tour, and then declaring for the Office of President. The ethics involved in the presumption of a quid pro quo are unquestionably and undeniably circumstantial.  Most Presidential Candidates are not being paid millions by Foreign Governments minutes before declaring for Office.

[The Justice Department and FBI began their investigation after receiving what is known as a security referral in July from the inspector general for U.S. intelligence agencies, which at the time were in the midst of reviewing paper copies of nearly 30,500 emails Clinton turned over in 2014 that she said were work-related.

The State Department has since released all 3,871 pages of Clinton’s emails in its possession and has determined that 22 of her emails contained "top secret" information, though they were not marked as such as the time Clinton was undeniably trained to recognize such.

[Legal experts] said Clinton’s emails, even those later deemed classified, were sent to aides cleared to read them, for example, and not private citizens, they said referring to Petreus Case.], however, it is understood Clinton's Emails were indeed back-hacked by or through a back door channel of her confidence friend Sidney Blumenthal as at least one Foreign operative known as Guccifer Russia Today reports included *sensitive classified intelligence regarding Benghazi just before and after the terror attack on 9-11-2012 that killed 4 Americans including Ambassador Stevens and the resulting ISIS state stronghold created in LIBYA, with lucrative oil and gas reserves at forefront, being  funded by [Saudi Arabia]: previously  with ties also to funding Obama's path to Harvard and on to the White House. **

*https://www.rt.com/usa/complete-emails-guccifer-clinton-554/

**http://mobile.wnd.com/2012/09/saudi-billionaire-did-help-obama-into-harvard/

The resulting national intelligence breaches alleged seem to be at least accumulating steam in the General Public Trial of Hillary Clinton being fed daily as allegations of mis-trust  are fueled continually and just as fast stomped down by Clinton's Interested and Invested Parties of the Press - seemingly cream-soft even as she lost by quite a stomping three caucuses this weekend in Hawaii, Alaska, and the big prize Washington State.

IN OTHER NEWS

The JUSTICE DEPARTMENT returned the Cody Robert Judy for President 2016 Complaint that noticed an arbitrary denial on a Motion for Forma Pauperis submitted to the United States Supreme Court Case No. 14-9396 Judy v. Obama that is asking the Court to defend the [natural born Citizen] qualification clause in Article II., Section 1, Clause 5 [born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents] hearing the damages and petition *de novo that depicts a sever discrimination on poor people making much less than the Federal Standard Poverty Level. This complaint was sent to Attorney General Loretta Lynch appointed by Obama highlighting the fact Obama also appointed Justice Sotomayor who was responsible for all Motions coming in on Appeal from the Tenth Circuit Court in Denver, Colorado.


*An appeals court hearing a case de novo may refer to the trial court's record to determine the facts, but will rule on the evidence and matters of law without giving deference to that court's findings. A trial court may also hear a case de novo following the appeal of an arbitration decision.

The Tenth Circuit Appeals Court in Denver, Colorado mentioned in their Review hearing the appeal de novo, but did not allow a hearing, argument, or Bench Trial on the material, nor did they rule on the merits of the definition of [natural born Citizen] that the petitioner asked the Court to consider to affirm the damages measured in the co-existing and battling campaigns for the Office of President defined in [qualifications] under the banner of the U.S. Constitution.

Democratic Presidential Candidate Cody Robert Judy compared the lack of restraint on the qualifications as a run-away horse opening the door to foreign usurpation of the Office of the President and a pollution of the very term [All American]- born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents - no dual citizenship or allegiance allowed in the Office.

"If a Court would actual hear the Case on the merits, just as Congress did in October 2004", Judy said, "in which they refused to change the terms after serious deliberation and testimony and subsequently heard 8 times also with the same rejection to change the terms, and firmly supported by 67% of Americans and apposed by only a minority of 31%.

Who can claim democracy isn't at work when its actually presented with all of the merits and considerations including the abject considerations of dual citizens as President having a divided or fractured loyalty noticed as non-American. Do most Americans even know that in Cuba for instance a communistic controlled dictatorship that foreign birth to Cuban Parents is not even recognized and is their laws would subject a U.S. President with a dual citizenship to their draft or military order?

No, but Courts hearing things like this as well as considering testimony that a real American change happens to first generation radicals who are more accustomed to theocracy forms of Government. It takes time and that change is undeniable in a second generations, confirming not only an incentive for population to come and stick around so their kids can be eligible for the Office of President, but provides sound ground from compromising the Executive Branch's top job also considered to be the Commander-in-Chief of the U.S. Military.

No other position in the U.S. Government is concentrated with so much power as the Judicial Branch and Legislative Branches are broken up into many different positions in Congress and the varying levels of Courts. Those who have allegiance to America certainly do so with the respect of the U.S. Constitution and our Courts are there to defend that and the American People's will without the hood-winking personalities of politicians just trying to get-over the law with bully tactics like Obama, Cruz, Rubio, Jindal and  McCain have.

"It certainly isn't a color problem, we have every color involved with huge egos trying to smash the door down", said Cody Robert Judy the only Presidential Candidate in America with a Bi-Partisan Federal Court Record over the last seven years mentioning all the Candidates in his legal action to the U.S. Supreme Court Case No. 14-9396.

Absent the Courts standing for the will of the people as described, the legislative mandate clearly made over history and modern times,  there is a minority that is constantly calling for usurpation of the U.S. Constitution and the majority of American must stand firm in parading those individuals in public as Clowns never to be elected again, and forever to be embarrassed as they have embarrassed themselves to the Supreme Law of this Land.

We salute The People who honor that which is unique in the world. We salute you AMERICA. May God Bless Your Union!



CRJ


ELITISM Most Dangerous Fear for Americans
https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=RmMSYZJBpQU

Here's one called INSPIRING


Here's another BUILDING AMERICA





Please consider a contribution to Cody Robert Judy's Campaign - Working Today for a Better America Tomorrow




Here's the Link to Contribute if you'd like to Cody's Campaign improve your record for Taking A Stand for the Constitution.



CRJ TODAY FOR A BETTER AMERICA TOMORROW.

My Writ before the Court has not been denied. Please read these post for a detail of why my Forma Pauperis Motion has been denied.

Cody Robert Judy
D-Candidate for President 2016







Thank You!


Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy Campaign
Cody Robert Judy



Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.

Web Site www.codyjudy.us
Keep coming back!


INSPIRING - I believe in You


Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!


Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!

Cody Robert Judy's book :



Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION


1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts

12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial

13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008

14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case

15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.







Wednesday, October 14, 2015

BREAKING NEWS U.S. SUPREME COURT ELIGIBILITY CHANGING - A LOSING STRATEGY the DNC Debate and the HRC Show


CHANGING - A LOSING STRATEGY 
The DNC Debate and the HRC Show 

The ‪#‎DEMOCRATDEBATE‬ failed miserably attracting a bit more than half of the R Debate Ratings. The Losing Strategy for ‪#‎Democrats‬ due in large part to their exclusiveness rather than inclusiveness.
The Privileged Class was on full display last night sadly on the HRC Show. It may be true, the Democratic Party has lost their way in GroupThink.
The GOP R Party has rode ‪#‎Obama‬ to victories in The House, The Senate, and now the [P]residency as they racked up more unqualified Candidates than Democrats.
The BLIND ‪#‎MAINSTREAMMedia‬ & Hollywood can't see what's happening and how bad the abuse of Obama has been exploited fully by Republicans.
The Obama Party is over- like a puppet on the strings failing as the puppet master releases the strings. The Fraudulent Life of the puppet is seen as Fake; no more entertainment- an old tired show- the usefulness is over.
Did you listen to the poor ‪#‎Inequality‬ and income disparity Sen. Sanders spoke of under the last 7 years of Obama? The DISASTER & FAILURE are anyone recognizing we have had a qualified President.

THE INCREDIBLE MISTAKE BY THE U.S. SUPREME COURT IN JUDY V. OBAMA 14-9396

The U.S. SUPREME COURT has made a BIG MISTAKE in depriving Justice to everyone in America in Judy v. Obama 14-9396 by depriving those earning 12 to 13K a year access in forma pauperis predominantly resting on Justice Sotomayor. While the Democratic Party by all accounts of their own standard candidates recognizes the income disparity on one hand upon America, and celebrates a supposed Justice on the U.S. Supreme Court purportedly as a great defense for such within the Court,  to not grant access to the Court on such is a blatant income disparaging outrage really warranting 'bad behavior' in this Case.


By so many accounts the United States Supreme Court has the duty to uphold precedent when dicta has over-ruled one of their decisions. This has been the  case in Arkeny and the natural born Citizen considerations in Minor v. Happersett concerning the natural born Citizen qualification for the Office of the President. The blatant refusal to ward off 'LOOKING' at the case is indicative of a disparaging ruling upon the poor or a blatant refusal to avoid duty resulting in a candid 'bad behavior' emphasis as was once pinned upon the Supreme Court Justice Chase for ruling in such a partisan way in a departure of the ensured independence of the judiciary.

The Court can certainly recognize mistakes in its clerical patterns and practices at any time. I for one do not see the Justices huddled around their calculators deducting the cost of business from the net income from Mr. Judy's  (my) 5 page in-depth Motion to proceed in forma pauperis as much as I do see a sheet of paper brought in summarizing the clerks work and recommendations to the Justices about 500 cases who all got the same treatment in a broad swipe of the Justices pen.

Unfortunately, Public Outcry is the only solutions for the Justices to recognize a mistake that has been made and to work to correct that problem. So I would encourage people who would like to write the Court and flood the phone bank with a cry of injustice. If we do not object to falling in the cracks we have only to be left to look at ourselves falling through the cracks.

As far as the U.S. Supreme Court not wanting to get involved in the political arena, they have long missed that boat. By forbidding Review of the 'natural born Citizen' clause I have brought to their front door, they have single handily kept me out of the Democratic Party Debate and stifled as a Candidate for President who has been doing the job of preserving, defending, and protecting the U.S. Constitution's core Office in the Executive Branch and shirking their own duty of checks and balances.

To prove the point, let them acknowledge the clerical error to withhold forma pauperis standing of my case, approve the Cert for Review, and see if I do not get invited to the next Democratic debate as the only Candidate with a Constitutional Case in the U.S. Supreme Court? Who is saying that doesn't work is really in denial and disillusioned with Justice.

As I have thought of a defining theme of my Campaign, I cannot escape the call for JUSTICE that resonates as so vital to America. Without Justice we are left to crooks and cheats gaming the system in the knowledge of how to do it best and for so many to be left to injustice based on their poor circumstances. I cannot in short order regret my circumstances if my clarion call for JUSTICE is magnified in the hearts of every Citizen, including a whole lot of lawyers who are staring at their own scales of justice and recognizing whole heartedly what is happening here. Someone must say STOP.

We all heard Mr. Anderson Cooper relay his relief that his 5 Presidential Candidates made it back from their restroom break in time during the commercial break. The Democratic Party itself has in a way denied the anti-establishment movement in America represented by the three leading Republicans who have never been elected by only exhibiting in the debate those who have been elected before. In the opinion of American Interest the philosophy is stifling and repugnant. The qualifications for the Office of the President did not include 'holding some prior elected office' as Kenya's Government holds in their Constitution,  but that is all the Democratic Wing of the Media will focus on it appears here in America.

AMERICA CANNOT AFFORD 
Mrs. CLINTON when her action demonstrates willful neglect to public transparency through FOIA

 The decision to bar Mr. Judy from proceeding with his Certiorari can only be seen as a much bigger MISTAKE than Mrs. Clinton thinking she could not log on to two email accounts on one device.
The Decisions together are perilous towards our National Security and are not benign. They are SIGNS of a malignant, fast-moving, and life-threatening cancer set about destroying the shield in the spine leading directly to the bone marrow.
Conservatives fooled about the plan for Republicans to "Ride Obama" into the dirt as far as they could, taking the House, taking the Senate, and poised now to take the Presidency are as fooled as Democrats are the Birther Movement at its heart is somehow racist rather than Constitutional.
For Democratic Candidates to see the 10 to 12 Trillion added on to the National Debt during Obama's Usurpation as a mark of success as "they" bailed BIG CORPORATIONS out as to BIG to fail, is simply more of a witness than a Complaint of the severe manipulation of evidence Mrs HILLARY Clinton is disguising by opening her fly to expose the Reason she should be elected President as well the VIDEOTAPE being the cause of Benghazi.
Its monumentally shallow as well as embarrassing!
We witnessed last night in the DEMOCRATIC Debate the good old days of Glass-Steagle" wished for without a simple acknowledgment it was President Clinton's parting DISASTER upon an otherwise pretty healthy economy.
Sen. Sanders sounded like a true communist socialist vowing to get a million-man gang and TAKE the CLINTON'S down as well as all the other Corporate Wealthy Elite and fundamentally excusing Mrs Clinton's White Collar Excuses as a Government Employee skirting FOIA.
Of course the GROUPTHINK in the Tank cheered as they have no clue how BIG of a National Security Breach has occurred and why would they 'cheer' to have their own ability to get government records access from Officers of our own Government?

WHAT IF MRS. CLINTON JUDGED HER SELF?
One of the most interesting Spectre[s] however of the Debate was Mrs. Clinton's harsh penalty recommendations for wiki leaks Snowden in comparison to Sen Sanders over all educational and awareness attribution to be considered in a Penalty Exactness.
The conclusion: Mrs. Clinton would certainly indict herself with an FBI Indictment for mistakes far superior to General Petraeus mistakes. Let that be the contemplation of the Media Press Room Cheers as it's a witness Mrs. Clinton holds herself above the Law and everyone else to The Standard of The Law.
I think by her own words and ability for Mercy she condemns herself. Asked about who their biggest enemies were Mrs. Clinton also ended a long list with an enlightened emphasis on "Republicans", which does not bode well for a President who has to work across the isle with Republicans.
It seemed exactly on point for Mrs. Clinton to assert The employment of Partisan Politics at what she claimed was also her mistake on a personal choice of an email server, as well as the narrative of the videotape in Benghazi thoroughly dis proven by bi partisan Congressional Committee.
The Cheers of the Crowd at the Debate for Bernie Sanders self-admitted-lapse "who cares about your (HRC) dang emails", could have just as easily be shaped by the participants of The Pay-to-Play investors of the Clinton Global Initiative being relieved their investment didn't tank.. [N]ot understanding their own GROUPTHINK as the world moaned around them.
The saddest thing to me of course was knowing there was an extra lectern that CNN chose not to employ in Raising their own Ratings to a curious American audience with my own Campaign Represented.
They chose as a cost of doing business in the Political Arena to quite the Stage, Suppress their own audience, and empty their own pockets in not having me there.
The interest this year in un-elected Candidates and an anti-establishment Crowd in America only symbolizes the degree of THINKTANK GROUPTHINK besieging our American Businesses in a whole lot of what The MSM deplores and Trump aptly calls ‪#‎Stupid‬.
http://money.cnn.com/…/cnn-democratic-debate-rat…/index.html

Thank You! 
Please, consider a Contribution Now by clicking the secure Paypal link. You contribution Today will help make a Better America Tomorrow!



Sincerely, 
Cody Robert Judy
2016 D- CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT

Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.
Web Site www.codyjudy.us 

Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.




Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!



Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!


Cody Robert Judy's book :





Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION
1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.


INSPIRING - I believe in You



APPLICATION FOR STAY PENDING FULL REVIEW ON THE RECUSAL OF JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT AND KAGAN FROM PROCEEDINGS


Saturday, May 16, 2015

Is the Media's bias in Influence, Denying Access to Justice in the Qualifications for President?


FEATURED EDITORIAL- The Post and Email
Is the Media's bias in Influence, Denying Access to Justice in the Qualifications for President?

In many ways we all have a hope that "Justice" for us is not tied to 'how much money we make', or 'how much money our lawyer costs us' as if the dollars that are demanded from a lawyer represent the greater the intelligence or likelihood of obtaining 'Justice'. How far away from "Justice" is that notion if she keeps her blind fold on and neutrality in the seat of justice is maintained while our advocates for the laws are opined.

We all hope that "Justice" for us is not tied to a big Lobby that takes big money to serve a Corporations interest while perhaps forgetting our own. Recently George Stephanopoulos chief anchor for ABC News and political adviser as is noted on his Wikipedia page, divulged an apology to viewers and his employer who pays him roughly ($8,000,000.00) eight million dollars a year, for not informing us and them of his ($75,000.00), seventy-five thousand dollar contribution made in increments of ($25,000.00), twenty-five thousand dollars. He goes the extra mile here on air, but the apology hasn't has the affect upon Americans ABC hoped for? (This video has been removed)


Mr. Stephanopoulos over just the last couple of years 2012, 2013 and 2014 decided that the Clinton Foundation was the best place to contribute to what he called the issues very dear to his heart in fighting Global Aids, helping children, and Deforestation. Although it has been reported that 90% of all contributions to the Clinton Foundation goes for expenses leaving only 10%, or roughly ($7,500.00) seventy-five hundred dollars of the ($75,000.00) seventy-five thousand dollars actually being contributed to funding Aids, helping children, and planting trees it does seem consistent with Hillary Clinton's waning years as Secretary of State and opening bid for President.

To complicate the matter George recently said while being interviewed by Jon Stewart of The Daily Show that the contributions to the Clinton Foundation were given in "hopes" for something in return starting in this clip at 3m48s:

“But everybody also knows,” he continued, “when those donors give that money… there’s a hope that that’s going to lead to something and that’s what you have to be careful of.”

This of course carries a pervasive underlining contextual hint that in the context of his own substantial contributions to the Clinton Foundation which has been made before the interview, it meant something other than AIDS Drugs and Trees, but might border on the personal level, like for instance, better access to the White House in screened interviews and tips that might provide a bigger audience to enhance the viewership of some network? (@ 3 minutes 48 seconds - 4m43s)
(This video has been removed)

At 5m19s you hear George say, "even if you don't get action what you get is access, and with access comes influence that comes with access and that's got to shape the thinking of politicians, that's what's so pernicious (having a harmful effect especially in a gradual or subtle way) about it." The Clinton Global Initiative that is under the Clinton Foundation may have become so foreign that it is more Global than the United States of America.

Recently we have seen Tom Brady fined 4 games and the Patriots a million dollars and losing two picks covered by ABC in which ABC reported:

NFL Executive President Troy Vincent said in a letter to Brady: "The integrity of the game is of paramount importance to everyone in our league, and requires unshakable commitment to fairness and compliance with the playing rules. Each player, no matter how accomplished and otherwise respected, has an obligation to comply with the rules and must be held accountable for his actions when those rules are violated and the public's confidence in the game is called into question." Last week, attorney Ted Wells, who led the Deflategate investigation, said it "is more than probable" Brady was aware of the release of air from the Patriots' footballs in the AFC Championship game.]

Certainly the obligation to comply with the rules is touted in every game or race to maintain the public's trust and confidence. In the Race for President, its the qualifications of the Constitution for the Office of the President that formulate those base rules and its those rules that I have applied in my petition for the United States Supreme Court to hear in Judy v. Obama 14-9396 asserting that the rules that a candidate be a 'natural born Citizen' have been violated with Obama and that my Civil Rights in fact have been violated in the context of damages based on Obama's purported father being a foreign influence not permitted in the "time based qualifications" of two generations and which is prohibited in the element of 'natural born Citizen'- Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents.

This has added implications with Republicans now especially with U.S. Senator Ted Cruz and U.S. Senator Marco Rubio entered into the 2016 Presidential Race and siphoning off contributions as fast as they can for an Office they are not qualified for by the standards of law in the review of my petition. How much coverage of this case is coming to the attention of the major networks like ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, and Fox News to the public? Thus far not a single national story despite their being informed directly in my Twitter and Facebook feed as well as many others who are demanding coverage.

Contrasting this principle of individual civil right is another issue widely reported on but affecting viewer citizens and that is the issue of Gay Marriage. Now if you look at the coverage of that issue, moments after being denied in Circuit Court levels we see stories appear in the news covering the even the lawyers stating they are going to take the case on to the U.S. Supreme Court. This has the effect of making what George Stephanopoulos referenced as access created by influence..

Is the Media's bias in Influence, Denying Access to Justice in the Qualifications for President?

Is the 'influence' that the Media is withholding, creating a denial of access to the U.S. Court on the very important subject of our Presidential Elections? One of the wonderful things about our whole Government is the concept that "Justice" is not to the highest bidder or the higher price paid. From the most famous 'frame' job of Jesus Christ as a malefactor which led to his capital punishment, we have hoped for a better system of Justice that would not punish the innocent.

In deed Sir William Blackstone stated in 1765,"It is better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer" and from Benjamin Franklin, "That it is better 100 guilty Persons should escape than that one innocent Person should suffer, is a Maxim that has been long and generally approved." The fortifications that have enveloped our system of governance is that indeed the right to "Defend oneself" has been upheld both in the 2nd Amendment but as well the right to represent oneself in Court to petition against wrongs Pro Se as well as Informa Pauperis.

Most U.S. states have a constitutional provision that either expressly or by interpretation allows an individual to represent one's own cause (pro se) in the courts of that state and informa pauperis is a phrase that indicates the permission given by a court to an indigent to initiate a legal action without having to pay for court fees or costs due to his or her lack of financial resources. Ordinarily we would celebrate rather than desecrate these options that hold "Justice" dear and true rather than to the highest bidder and to who has the most money in the corruption of pay-to-play.

There is also an additional fortification where an attorney may represent at no cost a litigant who he feels has a case but has no money and that in the interest of justice is willing to represent known as pro bono. Lawyers are actually encouraged like doctors to try and represent at least one pro bono case a year. The Chief Judge of New York has also instituted a requirement that applicants who plan to be admitted in 2015 and onward must complete fifty hours of pro bono service in order to qualify. All attorneys who register must report their voluntary pro bono hours and/or voluntary contributions.

Without embarrassment I have asked publicly and privately for help from many to take my case forward feeling the laws as they are understood on the books and represented have been run over when it comes to the qualification of a person for the office of the president meeting the 'natural born Citizen' requirement. In many discussions with well schooled people I have not been dissuaded that my assertions were correct, nor have I felt the damages horrendous and awful, but to my case because it was so hot and had such bearing politically the courage to do so was lacking.

The flabbergasting thing is to have witnessed the absolute disdain and horrendous abuse I have received from both Republicans and Democrats that I should be allowed or credited capable of representing myself under these circumstances. It is deplorable to the "emphasis" of Republicans that people should be self sufficient, seek independence, and protect themselves. It is equally deplorable to the "emphasis" of Democrats who seek "Civil Rights", "Helping those who can't help themselves", and of course the big one the representing deplorably the "war-on-the-poor" instead of the war on poverty.

Of course not all Republicans and not all Democrats go around talking like bullies and hypocrites on the conservative principles we should be representing on common ground. Yes, do liberals believe in conservative principles? Of course they do! Do you see them them out using their sprinklers in the rain during a drought in California and flushing to watch the water go down? Only in a few instances, but generally no. Do we see conservatives backing a former foreign Canadian Citizen for President? Yes, while they hate Obama's fabricated long form birth certificate they seem fine with Ted Cruz's foreign birth certificate.

Let me present this hope. Somehow, in the hope of our Country's formulation against all odds, their arose the importance of this sovereign Nation that would not be bound to the corruption of justice, but would hold to what we as American's have all recited in our Pledge of Allegiance, "Justice for all". Tis the greatest sadness I know to be from a Country for Justice for all, but to be handed the 'Injustice' as cruelty by the Media as they sweep this under the carpet. And wither they are Republicans or Democrats they realize and know that no one is in that office very long and a retaliatory decade of laws that swung left can be swung just as far right creating a heap of misery for which a necessary reason must be accounted for in a balance.

The hope I pray so hard for is that my case can be heard on the merits of 'Justice', not a Big Lobby, or a Big Lawyer, or a Big Corporation, or a Big Union behind it, unless you want to count the Union of the United States of American under the United States Constitution as big. We dream that we can make it. That we can find a way to Justice just simply for the sake of justice. That the truth hasn't become so old fashion that it can not be told because everyone lies. That forgiveness might also come to those who asked for it understanding they were wrong and have wronged or hurt someone in their actions.

Getting the U.S. Supreme Court to hear a case has nearly the same odds as getting struck by lighting. Lawyers and clients contemplating filing a petition for certiorari understand that obtaining Supreme Court review is a daunting task. According to the 1994 Harvard Law Review round-up, over 7000 petitions for certiorari were filed in Term of Court: 2151 in paid (i.e., non-indigent) cases and 4,979 in in forma pauperis (IFP) cases. The Court granted review in 83 paid cases (3.9%) and 10 IFP cases (0.5%). The odds on 0.5% are about 200:1 so, that about the odds of having your own identity stolen now which is kind of what I'm facing with the fabrication of Obama's identification.

How much does it normally cost to get a case to the U.S. Supreme Court?

[The first step is asking the court to consider your claim, which carries a pretty substantial lawyering price-tag. “If you’re just paying hourly, and you are paying at D.C. rates, it would be somewhere from $100,000 to $250,000,” says attorney James Bopp, who has argued many big-deal cases in front of the justices.]

[And that’s just to ask the Supreme Court to hear the case. If the justices agree, which they rarely do, then we’re talking really big numbers. “About the cheapest you can get away with at D.C. rates is $250,000,” Bopp says, “and then it ranges in the millions after that.” ]

But you also have to figure all of the cost just to get there which most likely was appealed from two lower Courts each that easily could have cost $100,000.00.

Now figure just try to imagine the cost of 15 cases and legal actions that I've been through to get to this point. What were the 15 Cases? Well, let's do a little inventory.

COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION

1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

All of this has been also in the action of now three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016 with a U.S. Senate race in 2010 which all have their web pages, commercials, and hand shaking involved in them.

Recently a FB Friend made this comment that I think summarized this pretty well. His name is John Harrison and he said on a post in the TEA PARTY COFFEE SHOP post May 13th at 2:19 by Roger Sharp issuing a challenge to all Cruz supporters:

"If all you people want to do something let's see what we can do to help Cody Robert Judy. That might MAKE A DIFFERENCE, unless you have a SCOTUS case coming up in the NEXT FEW WEEKS. Many of you may not realize this is NOT something you get up one morning and say, "WELL, I THINK I'LL GO HAVE A SCOTUS hearing. THIS is YEARS AND YEARS of work and a dump truck load of money. It is the best shot YOU GOT TODAY. HELP HIM OUT. If nothing elese you can put his post ALL OVER facebook, make it go viral THIS IS A BIG DEAL. If just one Justice gets wind of it, IT COULD MAKE A DIFFERENCE."

I think that was a realistic summary and what I'll sign off with.

Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy

P.S. We hope you enjoy our newest commercial!

INSPIRING - I believe in You
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7d-FcfeCPlI




We NEED YOUR HELP AMERICA now, to educate Americans in the order of our Constitution to hear Cody's Case to the U.S. Supreme Court. We are Taking a Stand for individual Civil Rights and against an unprecedented ASSAULT upon your Constitution and prior decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court! With your help we can make it happen. You are a very important key to this. So its up to you America to help Restore America Today for a Better America Tomorrow. Like, Share, and Help us in the Contribution Revolution.


Get your questions answered by ordering Cody Robert Judy's Book here.

The 2016 Campaign begins now. Please send your contributions and help with the ABC (American Birther Campaign) today and my election for President in 2016 and Join the 257 of us now on my Facebook Cody Robert Judy for U.S. President 2016 site.



Cody Robert Judy for President 2016
3031 So. Ogden Ave. Suite #2
Ogden, Utah 84401

Thank you
Cody Robert Judy
Candidate for United States President 2016
www.codyjudy.us

CONTRIBUTION REVOLUTION



The Commercial is simply called "America"


Join the new CODY ROBERT JUDY FOR PRES 2016 FB SITE Here



P.S. I don't get anything for the sales of this coin. No contributions or anything , I just think its kinda cool. Get your commemorative 2015 Birther coin today!