Let's Give Up the Constitution for a Piece of Trash? Hummm?

The following transcript from the video, and the video seen below is the most benign friendly piece of trash. What makes it so vagarious is its framer Professor of Constitutional Law at Georgetown University Louis Michael Seidman seems so dangerous who would pay him any attention?

Mild mannered, even tempered and a constitutional law professor - wasn't Obama also a "senior lecturer," at the University of Chicago Law School who said he "served as a professor" and said he was "regarded as" a professor?

I'd like to take this time to make some scratch marks over his "simple idea" which I've encased in [] and start with the first sentence which jumps right out of the gate on you like the orders from the leader of a flash mob set to trash a retail store in the mall:

[I've got a simple idea: Let's give up on the Constitution.]

Simple ideas are genuinely pure and straight forward, but even if he used the 6 words to shock you, the resulting vacuum of the Republic for which we stand has vanished for what we must assume is not a Republic, in which the majority mob rules and the individual loses. What would the ACLU say to that?

[I know, it sounds radical, but it's really not. Constitutional disobedience is as American as apple pie.]

Well, he has admitted to being radical here but knows its necessary to try and convince you otherwise. Our prisons are full of people who decided to break the law and here he is advocating "Constitutional disobedience" which is basically a disobedience of the Supreme Law of the Land the likes of which every office holder of the court and government have sworn to uphold.

[For example, most of our greatest Presidents -- Jefferson, Lincoln, Wilson, and both Roosevelts -- had doubts about the Constitution, and many of them disobeyed it when it got in their way.]

Perfect examples Presidents? - irregardless of any circumstances that our Constitution actually allows and provides for within the Constitution, which would make it not against the Constitution. He uses past presidents, who in his words in the bottom paragraph we would consider "ancient and outdated" as his examples of giving up on the Constitution? How is it possible to use "ancient and outdated" material to discredit "ancient and outdated material"? Shouldn't he be using modern material if he wants to discredit "ancient and outdated material"? He makes no sense.

[To be clear, I don't think we should give up on everything in the Constitution. The Constitution has many important and inspiring provisions, but we should obey these because they are important and inspiring, not because a bunch of people who are now long-dead favored them two centuries ago.]

Ohhhh so he thinks some things are good in the Constitution now and wants to save the "parts" of it that are "important and inspiring provisions", according to who? Him? I find the "natural born citizen clause for the Office of the President quite inspiring that has for over 200 years prevented a foreign leader from financing his own heirs on to the throne of the White House.

[Unfortunately, the Constitution also contains some provisions that are not so inspiring. For example, one allows a presidential candidate who is rejected by a majority of the American people to assume office. Suppose that Barack Obama really wasn't a natural-born citizen. So what?]

Holy Cow!- This guy is nuts. So the Electorate actually does their job and finds out because of a little investigation that the President Elect is only 11 years old and is the son of North Korea Kim Jong II- a son he had born in Hawaii. Anyone see a problem with that? He obviously doesn't. Or was he talking about the off chance insanity plot of the the Pres and VP actually being assassinated and our Constitution providing a back up in the chain of command who would have the authority vested in them, but who were not elected specifically for that office while we got together and voted again? He doesn't like that part.

[Constitutional obedience has a pernicious impact on our political culture. Take the recent debate about gun control. None of my friends can believe it, but I happen to be skeptical of most forms of gun control.]

Pernicious? Such a coy word - Having a harmful effect, esp. in a gradual or subtle way. What? He just said we should abandon the Constitution and he doesn't think he is being pernicious? Then he has the audacity to chum up to the Constitution's 2nd Amendment? This guys dumb and he's got balls. That's a dangerous combination. The fact his friends don't believe he's a friend to the Constitution makes me wonder if his friends are right. His opening statement did in fact say "Give Up the Constitution" rather then "Give Up parts of the Constitution" in some sensible and reasonable term as the Constitution permits, being flexible and adaptable to modern times by 2/3rds of a majority. Does he have a problem with finding 2/3rd of the Representatives and Senators that we the people, the majority, pick actually agreeing on an Amendment? What - its not fast enough for him or is it the fact that 2/3rd is just too heavy of a burden?

[I understand, though, that's not everyone's view, and I'm eager to talk with people who disagree.]

Yes, he's eager to talk to people who disagree with the 2nd Amendment because they are more his friends then the ones he was referring to can't believe he's a 2nd Amendment champion?

[But what happens when the issue gets Constitutional-ized? Then we turn the question over to lawyers, and lawyers do with it what lawyers do. So instead of talking about whether gun control makes sense in our country, we talk about what people thought of it two centuries ago.]

Now he's comparing taking a stand for the Constitution to constipation in the word "Constitutional-ized" is that even a word in the wiki dictionary? Yes it is and it means: Incorporated into a constitution. How does that happen? Oh yes, 2/3rd of the Congress agree to it. Then he reveals his true colors on gun control advocating the notion that people two centuries ago could not have possibly wanted a gun for the same reason our military does, our own militia's do, and our own hunters do? How could the line of thinking still exist of overthrowing a tyrannical government? Is tyrannical dictator king still a word he understands?

[Worse yet, talking about gun control in terms of constitutional obligation needlessly raises the temperature of political discussion. Instead of a question on policy, about which reasonable people can disagree, it becomes a test of one's commitment to our foundational document and, so, to America itself.]

More on Gun Control out of his 2nd Amendment respecting mouth here; funny I've never heard of anyone at the NRA's rally's getting riled about people giving them weapons. Its always the people wanting to take their water and bee-bee guns away that pisses them off.

[This is our country. We live in it, and we have a right to the kind of country we want. We would not allow the French or the United Nations to rule us, and neither should we allow people who died over two centuries ago and knew nothing of our country as it exists today.]

A little patriotism out of his mouth respecting America's Constitution and its flexibility for our modern age? No, he's mocking it. He also advocates that the French and United Nations should not rule over us and then throws the founder and framers overboard with them. He just doesn't understand our Constitution is flexible and provides a great way for Amendments does he? He also doesn't seem to understand that people who lived two centuries ago thought making-love was a lot better then making war. That's pretty standard I think. The proof? We're here because our Daddys got our Mama's pregnant and managed enough food to feed us. WhaWhoo!

[If we are to take back our own country, we have to start making decisions for ourselves, and stop deferring to an ancient and outdated document.]

Take back our country? From who? It sounds like this guy is advocating for England to take back the States. In which case he is aiding and abetting for something even more ancient and outdated then the Constitution. If this professor from Georgetown University, a school that was on my list to attend when I was 18, is anything like the others I'd say America has no friend there, but old King George might have, and I made the right decision not to attend. Reminds me of a few words of my new song The Promise Man - "your the new American slave, that's what this is all about."

Now if you wanna hear this pompous elitist B.S. in action just hit the play button.
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-3445_162-57566014/professor-take-our-country-back-from-the-constitution/




Cody Robert Judy
YouTube: Cody Judy
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4otwMXGzvac


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-sVTov29ZQ4



Words to The Promise Man

Presenting: The Promise Man - by The Cody Robert Judy Band celebrating SCOTUS Case # 12-5276 Judy v. Obama and demonstrating the reasons for protecting the Constitution that provide the opportunity in America. This includes the natural born citizen clause unique to the Office of the President Obama fails not being born in the U.S. to Citizen parents.
(Words)
The Promise Man
Prelude:
I'm talkn' to all you dreamers -- think America is your opportunity..yea -- you can't hide from me -- I see you out there- loving the opportunity- That America brings -- Yea you got your own style- and that's what I want to talk to you about.

Vs.1 -- You see that ole ball is slowing down but your dreams are speeding up- That economic ladders growing faster and let's face it you aint keeping up- Obama's got a spending habit, he's a generational spending jack rabbit- Now its you he's selling out- and for this there aint no doubt- You're the new American slave-That's what this is all about -- That's what this is all about.

Vs.2 -- You know I don't mince no words --No I aint got time for all of that- But I give this time to you- Hell, you know it's the least that I could do.- Because you are my American brother from another mother- Before it gets to cold- You know that fortune favors the bold.-And that snake is coming around telln' you it aint maken' a sound- And its grip is getn' tighter-Its gonna squeeze till there aint no fighter -- And then what you gonna do -- All those dreams aint coming true -- All those dreams aint coming true.

Vs.3 - You need to walk out on this man -- Whose putting a curse on this here promise land-While your purse is getn' lighter --You say Code your just a Constitutional fighter- I'm telling you 16 trillion ain't no joke -- Turning all that hope into --Now you gotta cope- While this country's going up in smoke -- You know you're all goin broke. --The ball aint slamming down quite as fast- Hell your good times-They aint gonna last-Cuz your freedom suffered a concussion -- Remember this is America -- This aint Russia.

Vs.4- I'm not tryn to be no rock'n rapper- Hell, I'm a politician- I got dreams just like you- I'm calling to your recognition- You know I don't use dope -- Hell, I don't even smoke- But ole Uncle Sam's going broke- This aint what you call superstition. -- Why I'm tryn' to tell you about Obama-Gate -- I'm not tryn' to excommunicate -- But you don't wanna hear -- The loss of freedom and liberties your biggest fear -- I'm just like you -- Writing at my kitchen table- Tell'n you about Obama's fable -- Telln' you about Obama's fable.

Chorus: (insert between verses total 4)

I'm putting on my coat -- I'm walking out on this man (repeat 4 times) I'm putting on my coat-walkn out on this man- make me the promise land --make me the promise land. I'm putting on my coat --I'm walk'n out on this man -- I'm putting on my coat- I'll be your promise man -- Yeah, I'll be your promise man.

SCOTUS Election Challenge: Obama’s Operation to Amputate

SCOTUS Election Challenge: Obama’s Operation to Amputate

The progressive war on women continues with the Obama Administration as Obama considers a plethora of restrictions this week on the public’s right to bear arms, protected by the 2nd Amendment of the Constitution, Joe Biden has corralled as recommendations just waiting for the Executive Order and signature of Obama – a candidate for President who fails the ‘natural born citizen’ clause of the Constitution occupying the White House, whose using a social security number assigned from Connecticut and never has been a resident there, whose own attorneys are on record reporting his long form birth certificate is a forgery- whose own draft registration has been called by a criminal investigation of law enforcement altered.

Coming on the heels of Obama’s executive order granting him tax-payer funded Secret Service protection for life, The Sandy-Hook slaughter has had a major affect upon an emboldened Administration for restrictions against those suffering “any” mental health problems targeting and profiling the guns of any household with persons on mental health medications.

Now why would the Administration want to target all house-holds with anyone taking mental health prescribed drugs if they didn’t trust the drugs? It boils down to an assault upon the female gender or a complete lack of faith in the mental health drugs.

Statistically the major portions of the population suffering from mental health issues are predominantly women. In fact in Utah considered by many to be per capita the psycho-tropic capital of the United States it would easily dis-arm half of the population and house-holds. In fact about 25 or so guns caught in security checks out of Utah airports and the rest of the nation here.

Wither women are more likely to go see a psychiatrist for marital problems in counseling, more vulnerable to depression, more sensitive spiritually, or weaker in a physical confrontation, it all boils down to the female populations weaknesses that this administration is targeting and profiling because they would be the most affected by such an executive order.

How is this unwanted advance on gun and Wallmart ammo control and household gun confiscation to effect Women who have been sexually assaulted, raped, and been prescribed any psychiatric medication for stress? If signed into law, these women would be considered a sever risk to carry hand-guns, and their house-holds could be stripped of arms their husbands could use to protect them, leaving no protection other then steak-knives and base ball bats. Assaults happen within 5 minutes and so the police are nowhere in range to help.

Post traumatic syndrome, rape victims, an aunt, mother, teen-ager treated for depression, memory loss, forgetfulness, amnesia under the roof of any man who is a hunter and owner of guns would necessarily have to give up the guns in the household. If the Doctor didn’t ask you about guns in your home when prescribing such meds, then Doctors could be prosecuted for a felony.

Now Birthers have called these spécificités of Obama’s background that would prohibit his 2nd Amendment right to own, buy, or use a firearm because of a failed back ground check , a concern warranting criminal investigations, but it’s not fair to call Obama a criminal for hiding under the umbrella and cover of identity fraud simply because it hasn’t been prosecuted.

Newly elected Utah Attorney General John Swallow has invited an investigation by the United States Attorney General’s office in the alleged bribery scandal opened by testimony of Jeremy Johnson to eliminate any doubt of wrong doing; however Obama remains fearful of any Congressional hearings in his identity problems and an open court review of the qualification demands of the Office of the President. Why is Obama so fearful of this review in open court or Congress?

In Oprah Winfrey’s interview with Lance Armstrong’s came a review from Psychologist suggesting Lance’s personality dis-order highlighted by the ability to lie for years about taking performance enhancement drugs could have been the result of child hood trauma. Lance Armstrong hasn't just denied ever using performance enhancing drugs, he has done so in an indignant, even threatening way much the way Obama has treated Birthers. Both may be suffering from narcissism because they must be loved , have to be adored , have the ability lie to a camera, feels the truth has no value, and have built up a huge following on the lies that are told and thus the expectations are demanding. Now Armstrong may be cornered by the U.S. State Department for damages as a rep for the post office.

No one wants that kind of person, or the criminally insane armed and in the White House as President? Institutionalized persons can’t pass a back ground check, but neither could Obama if you run his social security number or honored his Jakarta State adoption by step-father Lolo Soetoro which allowed him to enroll and attend school. Now what good are records if we are just going to ignore them? Make no mistake Obama wants “your” medical records though?

Now, radio show host Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck continue to raise the warning signs of Obama’s dictatorial and tyrannical behavior, that most believing in the Constitution would call ‘insane’ and more then wrong-doing but a ‘crime’ and he’s in the White House! Do you see how fast the “label” of someone can affect you personally?

Recently former Presidential Candidate Jon Huntsman has made association with the“No Label” conference aimed at helping people find solutions rather than so much ideology with party and many Americans are getting sick of the Republican and the Democrat Parties. Obama seeks to label people, in a divide and conquer mentality and with that label "mental health" confiscate the house-holds weapons and suspend the Constitution. It’s no secret Obama’s own lies are to be permitted while Birthers telling the truth are put down. Labels are and can be more often used by the dictates of the eyes of the beholder. That is why Obama must be held accountable to the Constitution.

Rush and Glen both say there’s a thing called The Constitution and that it is a bulwark of law. Now they say executive orders are not meant for the President to get around or violate the Constitution. The Constitution defines our Country. It holds our country together. Obama’s signed 23 Executive Orders ( 144 total) on guns in the usurpation of the Constitution because no one will stand up against that? If Congress doesn’t stand up for the Constitution the Office of the President can wipe them, and all their work, out by executive order.

Executive Orders are not supposed to break the law, change the law, and they certainly are not meant to grant unfettered dictatorial power. The Legislative Branch is supposed to be the Branch writing laws. I want you to understand this.
Rush and Glenn both want you to know they would not lie to you either. Big question then: Why aren’t they Birthers? Why do they cover for Obama’s violating the Constitution in the natural born citizen clause in the Constitution?

So all that needs to happen is “accusations” of your mental unfitness by a doctor who orders and then prescribes a medications and bam your Constitutional Rights are non-existent? Should any women have a right to own a gun? Once you suffered from depression can’t you always be susceptible- once an alcoholic always an alcoholic? Glenn Beck admits he could fall off the wagon tomorrow. This is the mentality that has no bounds in its ability to suspend your rights by doctor’s orders, and thus your right to bear arms.

Do Doctors ever make mistakes referenced as SRE's (serious re-portable events)? Oh I think there were only half a million people mis-identified and operated on last year that were mistakenly assumed by doctors needing treatments like amputations and organ transplants. The wrong patients woke up without spleens or limbs that had been cut off accidentally, or an instrument sewed up inside them. With mental health issues you only need to look at the law suits of particular mental health medications recommended actually causing harm to know when it comes to chemistry many Doctors are actually shooting in the dark and to think that blindfolded they could actually prohibit your Constitutional rights is pretty legitimate for what American patriots would call political insanity.

How do you define “mental illness”? “Paranoia” often is a symptom of a mental health dis-order and many main stream media commentators who have called for confiscations of weapons from any household where mental health medications have been prescribed are indeed suffering from a delusional fear of safety and security. We don’t ban cars because of car accidents, but the solution to dis-arming all house-holds who have under the roof someone taking mental health drugs is actually palatable? How in the world is taking away from women the right to arm themselves against attackers palatable?

This gets into an assault upon religious beliefs to. Do you believe in the Holy Ghost? If you do, you need psychiatric medication? If you believe Mary conceived baby Jesus by Holy Conception are you insane? If you believe Moses received the 10 Commandments from God’s holy finger are you insane? You see how fast the entire Country can be called by an atheist believing doctor insane and in need of “psychiatric medication” and thus needs to be dis-armed?

How many people with mental dis-orders now won’t trust their doctors? I’d say Obama has done more to ruin the patient doctor relationship then any single person occupying the White House in the last month. When you consider the confiscation of guns and ammunition on every house-hold or under any roof where there is a person with a mental health issue you’re basically with one executive order able to dis-arm more than 50% of the population now armed. That’s why Obama’s going after the women on the mental health issue.

Lithium – Prozac – all the anxiety and depression drugs once used to help people now are used to target, profile and dis-arm American households. How’s that for progressive?

Now, why go over all of this, why discuss it? Well, the most important part of selecting a president is to find someone who understands these threats to your security. These are threats to your free speech, your right to bear arms, even your right to worship freely. These fundamental inalienable rights are under direct assault by Obama and he is unqualified for the Office of the President.

If your security demands upholding the Constitution then you have to find a President who at least understands the Constitution and isn’t a walking talking violation of the Constitution. People talk about people who have died because of guns, what about the people who have died for our Constitution? Has the Gov. of New York forgotten them in the Cuomo bill?

Statistically, Sandy-Hook is an anomaly but it doesn’t relieve the grief of the families bearing the grief and loss of their households; however, no law can bring them back to life again either.

How many of those parents seeing a perpetrator walk through their front door wouldn’t want a gun or use a gun to protect their children in a dangerous situation? I haven’t seen any suggestions such as a push button alarm put under every teacher’s desk that could sound a siren distracting a would-be perpetrator much like a bank has that notifies officials of a bank robber? Doesn’t it make more sense to protect our children then it does to protect our money? That makes more sense than dis-arming women who have suffered attacks based on their receiving any help in prescribed medications.

Laws are only as good as they are enforced and Obama’s occupation in the White House as an unqualified person for the Office of the President is a perfect shining example on the Hill that no matter the executive order or law passed by Congress we have an example in the White House of just how to get around the law rather than live by the law.

This has been the cause of my action in Judy v. Obama 12-5276 in the United States Supreme Court, which has thus far been evaded by the Court. The Chief Justice of the Untied States Supreme Court- Justice John Roberts received this letter today in the action.
Your item was delivered at 10:50 am on January 15, 2013 in WASHINGTON, DC 20543.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9fNjSTFI7_I



Cody Robert Judy


We need your help - America needs your help - http://www.codyjudy.us/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm Here is where you can help Cody.

The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
Cody Robert Judy for President
Plaintiff/ SCOTUS Case No. JUDY v. OBAMA 12-5276
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODY JUDY
FEC REGISTERED  http://fec-candidates.findthedata.org/l/4426/Judy-Cody-Robert
Candidate ID P20003372
Committee ID C00501593


Petition for Rehearing under consideration:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/113046270/Judy-v-Obama-12-5276-Petition-for-Rehearing


Writ of Cert under consideration Judy v. Obama 12-5276
http://www.scribd.com/doc/100156244/Judy-v-Obama-Petition-for-Writ-of-Certiorari-Revision-per-U-S-Clerk-Case-Analyst-Appendix-Stamped-Orders-Included

No Leg to Stand on- The Justices denied Judy v. Obama 12-5276

My ,- Our- ;), "Petition for Rehearing" with the U.S. Supreme Court was "Denied". ; /

Makes me feel bad because they wouldn't even hear it and in doing so they have basically, officially squashed the "natural born citizen" qualification for President in the Constitution without a word or hearing.

http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=%2Fdocketfiles%2F12-5276.htm

I just feel terrible they wouldn't even let us have an oral argument on it,just locked us out.

You know I can hardly believe it. I wish I had one of the Justices cell phones because it just doesn't make any sense. Without being able to speak with them we are left to take the "Clerk of the court's word" for it.

Because of the process I've been through I know its entirely possible they didn't see the case and some Clerks black-bagged it, but there's no way to talk to them. If not that, then you wonder if they are so threatened that they feel the compromise is in the broader interest of the agreement;say someone's got a nuclear pointed at NY, and they simple are black mailed, which is entirely possible.

Faced with that situation what we any of us do? Say good bye to 8 million Americans in NY? God.. that would be hard.

Frankly, I think we are in a hell of a situation here and the "agenda" of what's going down is just going to blow us away when its fully understood. I mean when the FBI, CIA, SCOTUS, Military and Congress say its okay to forge birth certificates and lie your way to the top what do you say? "We tried", that's pretty pathetic but that's about where we're at.

If I hadn't been through what I've been through with the SCOTUS Clerks I might have more faith that the Justices had indeed reviewed my case. Its the actions of the Clerks of the SCOTUS themselves, that I can not deny, that make me suspicious that the Justices haven't seen their way to this case.

These actions I am left to contemplate myself and if I had not been the recipient I would have nothing to say, nor would I probably believe it if someone was telling me as I am you.

But ... I don't think there is anything to do about it either. I'm scratching my head. The good thing I do know, is that if its a pit they're digging for our Constitution, I'm sure they will find themselves in the pit they had dug sooner or later. I hope that's not the case but God won't see our Constitution die though it may hang by a thread, the thread won't break, in this I have faith.

One thing I do share is the frustration of many Americans who 'trust' their leaders and those they have elected to do the right thing and defend the Constitution. We have proven that Congress was shammed with the CRS Memorandums about Obama's birth certificate and that thousands of letters have gone out to the public with the advice of the sham perpetrated by Jack Maskell. Here's a review if you missed that.





We know that Congress was manipulated. We know that Obama passed out documents certifying his birth that were manipulated. We know his lawyers know that his long form birth certificate and short form and selective service card were manipulated making them non usable for official purposes.

We know that Obama's purported father disqualifies him from being President. We know they all know this, and that they know we know, they know we know they know, however those elected leaders in Congress that can do something and should do something about it won't.

Is it embarrassment because they have all been snookered? Is it a deep seated hatred they have for the Constitution itself? Is it power unchecked that once they get to Washington DC numbs their brain and head?

Perhaps its the snake that they feel isn't coiled quite tight enough for them to throw down the gauntlet on Obama's eligibility so we can at least have a president who fills the natural born citizen requirement of our Constitution in the White House as a commander-in chief who isn't a walking talking violation of the Constitution?

Do Republicans still feel cozy about watching Obama make a mockery of the Constitution and a mockery of them in economical protocol and the economy with a 16 Trillion dollar debt that is going up 100,000 every 6 seconds, to a Government who offers no palatable smidgen of sweet to reducing their spending?

Ever wonder how both the Iraq war and Afghanistan War could be over and our Government figure out a way to spend even more money now?

So often with the victors of war go the spoils, and Obama is spoiling our Nation and I don't think this is a place even anti-birthers, including the media, who somehow retain a verifiable certifiable belief that nothing is amiss when it comes to Obama's eligibility in the face of professional law enforcement investigations on the matter, and with what a little homework could uncover.

We're left thinking they don't like home-work, or they just don't think it matters all that much. That is definitely one way to think. Perhaps understandably they think, "No single individual can stand up against all of this because so many people are involved now."

Credibility, integrity, honest, virtue, even the moral fiber of our society is at risk because those in charge put it all on Harvey Dent... ole two face himself: Barry Soetoro/Barack Obama, whichever one he is when he turns profile. You've seen Obama cast as the Joker, but Harvey Dent who turned into Harvey Two Face makes more sense.

No one raised the roof about Obama being a U.S. Senator and there he was living the dream of a Kenyan Born lad who had literally overcome so many odds.

Somewhere in between the time Obama was a U.S. Senator and the decision to run for President he crossed a line and now we have Obama two-face and what seems all of our Government, on both sides of the isle, defending the very acts of fraud and forgery most would go to prison for perpetrating at the powerful and important level of the Office of the President.

Well, like Nixon said he believed, " When the President does it it's not illegal", only difference between the mentality of the media now verses the mentality of the media then was Nixon was a Republican, and the media now shares Obama's feelings rather then apposes that view.

Ronald Reagan appointed three United States Supreme Court Justices and many people don't recall that was superseded by Nixon appointing no less than four United States Supreme Court Justices, when wondering about justice being blind then as compared to now.

There is one slimmer of a positive to note here in the contemplation of the actions here by the United States Supreme Court Justices and that is the broader view that the United States People are gaining of them and of the integrity of the United States Supreme Court.

Of course as you may have been introduced to in a blog of mine before, justice is not always right, even at the highest levels. Many many people have not been exposed to such thought. Its almost new to them even though people as myself have suffered the injustices for years.

I am happy to have many many more people join me in the ideology that justice is really fucked up in this country by most every official anyone knows. When you can count on one hand the law officials willing to knuckle down on Obama's ineligibility and the fraud and forgery present in this nefarious cover-up, and realize the paltry handful of people with integrity who are elected officials, you gain an understanding of being victimized by the un-lawful actions of officials representing the law, and how that feels.

Yes, I'd say Obama has done more for America then any person in the White House, when it comes to America gaining a empathy and understanding for those oppressed in prisons, set up, accused falsely, and having their Constitutional Rights abolished and stripped away.

Where are my 2nd Amendment rights to defend myself after I did the time society asked? Obama's taken my guns away and now he's after yours.He'll get them to, you watch.

These poor fatherless bastard Congressmen will tote up to him to; you can't trust them as far as their oaths. If their oaths meant a red-cent nickle to them they'd be opening up Congressional Investigations and Sheriff Arpaio and people like myself would be called in to testify on the matter of Obama's fraud & Forgery docs and his ineligibility.

Look what (Congress)they've done to your "natural born citizen" demand in the Constitution America. Threw that out like a piece of toilet paper they'd just blown their nose on or wiped their arse on.

I feel sorry for most American's now who "think" they have a 2nd Amendment Right or any rights, because Obama's closed the hamper on his dirty clothes or eligibility, and Congress isn't about to do Obama's dirty laundry.

You know I used to be an avid hunter too. Really enjoyed the sport. The Governments basically told me I can't have any self defense to myself. If someone wants to pull up and shoot away they can shoot anyone whose ever had a felony pretty well get away with it. Of course that's what the Government does and sadly we've seen it witnessed time and time again.

Government decides they see someone whose peaceable assembled at home and pretty soon here they come with their S.W.A.T teams and warrant-less search and seizures capacity armed with nuclear weapons if necessary and blows you to away to kingdom come. The hunters in every state might as well start sucking the wind-pipes of their deer rifles now.

I'm sorry to say this, but there is nothing right now between you and a clean Bill of Rights and you're own law enforcement people in you're own home town in you're own home state are witnesses that what I'm saying is the truth because they are in on the cover-up of Obama's fraud and forgery and his ineligibility! They are in on it, and helping Obama as his mice!

You think this through. If every Sheriff was calling every Governor and telling them they had thousands of people at his door clamoring about Obama's fraud and forgery expecting him to complain and the Governors had every sheriff in every county hankering, Obama and his mincing Congress wouldn't be more than another week in office.

That's the God honest Truth of the matter. Now you know the reason that the Republican Party is through. Its over. They are no longer the party of conservatism and if your American and conservative you need to understand this. The Republicans in office right now are not worth the manure out behind the barn as fertilizer.



The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
Cody Robert Judy for President
Plaintiff/ SCOTUS Case No. JUDY v. OBAMA 12-5276
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODY JUDY
FEC REGISTERED  http://fec-candidates.findthedata.org/l/4426/Judy-Cody-Robert
Candidate ID P20003372
Committee ID C00501593




Petition for Rehearing under consideration:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/113046270/Judy-v-Obama-12-5276-Petition-for-Rehearing





Writ of Cert under consideration Judy v. Obama 12-5276
http://www.scribd.com/doc/100156244/Judy-v-Obama-Petition-for-Writ-of-Certiorari-Revision-per-U-S-Clerk-Case-Analyst-Appendix-Stamped-Orders-Included

America No Games Just You- CRJ Election Challenge 2012 New Commercial

FOR IMMEDIATE PRESS RELEASE:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9fNjSTFI7_I



America No Games Just You- CRJ Election Challenge 2012


America provides opportunity, so many choices that are important to women, and encompasses a mixing pot in America of many diverse people. To keep America happy she simply ask you pay her a visit once in while and adhere to the Constitution's demand for a natural born citizen in the Office of the President.

Thanks for Passing it on, supporting or http://www.codyjudy.us/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm contributing in any way you feel you can.


“Mr. President, it is natural to man to indulge in the illusions of hope. We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth, and listen to the song of that siren till she transforms us into beasts. Is this the part of wise men, engaged in a great and arduous struggle for liberty? Are we disposed to be of the number of those who, having eyes, see not, and, having ears, hear not, the things which so nearly concern their temporal salvation? For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst, and to provide for it….
“Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!”

Speech at St. John’s Church, Patrick Henry, March 23, 1775

Winston Churchill saved England, Europe,from enslavement by the Third Reich and these words of his are poignant:

"If you will not fight for the right when you can easily win without bloodshed; if you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a small chance of survival. There may even be a worse case: you may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves."

Let me take this time to wish everyone of you, a very Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, and while I know this may be far from Holiday Cheer, it is the appreciation for Holidays, for the freedom to celebrate in the spirit our beloved Constitution provides me that keeps me urging you towards more courtesy towards it.

God Bless America and may his grace penetrate the darkest corners and allow the light to shine upon this principle for the whole Earth to see that We The People have a case for his judgement, pleading for the peace that accompanies our principles.

Cody Robert Judy
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign

Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.us
Contribute: http://www.codyjudy.us/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODE4PRES
FEC REGISTERED  http://fec-candidates.findthedata.org/l/4426/Judy-Cody-Robert
Candidate ID P20003372
Committee ID C00501593