Author - Cody Robert Judy
Conservative Independent American
Candidate for Pres 16, 12, 08
U.S. Senate 18, 10, 04, 00
U.S. Rep. 02
Book: Taking A Stand - The conservative independent Voice
In the 9 years of my challenging Obama's Ineligibility not a single story has emerged from ABC, CBS, NBC, Fox, CNN,The Blaze, MSNBC, or any of the mainstream conservative radio show host like Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, or Glenn Beck. So was it all that surprising when President Trump campaign ad was refused by the MSM which depicted them as FAKE NEWS?
Take a look at the Evidence in the Opening Brief filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Court May 4th, 2017 and ask yourself if the evidence presented did not warrant a FACE for the Nation? Let me say I am not a trained professional lawyer and have had to file with my own study and education. It is also a in forma pauperis filing.
We ask you to be the Judge of the Reporters and the Networks who now facing charges indeed of personalizing the nations news to fit their personal agenda. Why else would they refuse to publish a political ad for the nations general election in 2020 in President Trump's re-election, when the only reason for not publishing it was because of a critique on their coverage?
First of all, Lawyers don't often make public what is filed in Court because it opens an unwelcome critique which is what Donald Trump's ad did calling the Networks and their critique in coverage of his First 100 Days Fake News. This Clip of the Sean Hannity Show interviewing Lara Trump shows the ad in question also.
The Bullet Points of the Brief
. . . . . .
That Obama is not a [natural born Citizen] ie. born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents qualified for the Office of the President under the provisions of the Constitution.
That the DNC and OFA combined as Corporations to form a monopoly which acted as a cartel because of the illegal actions of disenfranchising the State of Hawaii's Certification which [did not] represent Obama was constitutionally qualified under the provisions of the U.S. Constitution.
That Fraud has been committed against the State of Hawaii by Rep. D- Nancy Pelosi in her certification for Hawaii which was misrepresentation of Obama's ability to serve in the Office of President under constitutional provisions. That all 49 States in the Democratic party Primary had no such certification either nationally.
That Obama procured a fabricated document as a "long form birth certificate" and represented it as an identification document to the public which was fabricated in 2012 and which has been certified by forensic document experts independent of Sheriff Joe Arpaio's Cold Case Posse. That the lower District Court has acted unjustly in serving a blanket of innocence for the defendants in the face of evidence from Law Enforcement Investigation and refused to try the facts or let a jury trial hear the case and in such as acted itself illegally in misprision of felony.
That because of these things the elections of 2008 and 2012 and possibly 2016 have been a fraud upon the voting public and the Appellant/Petitioner as a Democratic Party Candidate for President himself.
That there exists an Obama-Trump-Alliance that managed a public safety net for Obama's Fraud which became a lucrative business deal for President Trump in securing the Old Post Office which he made a Trump Hotel that may explain Trump's being a fake Birther who did not put any money into the challenge of ineligibility or file a single paper against his Republican opponents who he challenged in Debate on stage on their ineligibility ie. Cruz, Rubio.
Sharing is Caring - If you care and government corruption bothers you. Please take the time to share and perhaps consider a contribution or donation to this effort here:
A MOTION FOR A RELIEF OF JUDGEMENT or to REOPEN the Case due to the new evidence provided by a law enforcement investigation Cold Case Posse unit deputized under Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa Country AZ provided the evidence that Obama's long form birth certificate is a Fabricated Forgery, not an original, with the use of Johanna Ah'Nees identity birth certificate and was only recently released and available for criminal consideration by the Judicial Branch. See the video below
Cody Robert Judy Contribution save/secure paypal
ContributeNow for a Restoration of Faith in Justice
or Mail your donation to
Cody Robert Judy
3037 South Ogden Ave
Suite 1
Ogden, Utah 84401
UPDATE: Friday - Jan 4th, 2013
I have been informed that a more comprehensive understanding will be generated Monday at 9:30 AM from the United States Supreme Court on case 12-5276 Judy v. Obama http://www.supremecourt.gov/
SCOTUS Election Challenge presents: The Standing Argument Wipe Out... again.
The pesky "Standing Doctrine" again haunts Orly Taitz again at the Ca. State Supreme hearing challenging the electoral college vote count, just as it did in California Courts in Keyes (Barnett) v. Obama which went to the 10th Circuit Appeals Court and was met with rejection because none of the plaintiffs who were running in 2008 continued their run for President in 2012.
Throughout Birther History, or since the dawn of Obama's opposition to the Constitution's demand for a 'natural born citizen' required by Article II, Section I, clause 5, "STANDING" has been the biggest challenge and a Presidential Candidate is needed for standing.
Orly didn't have a presidential candidate as a plaintiff today in the State Supreme Court of California ... again. Pastor James David Manning had me testify at the CIA COLUMBIA OBAMA SEDITION AND TREASON Trial, specifically because I had 'Standing'as a Presidential candidate who suffered harm in the general election. It was very compelling for the jury who found him guilty to understand my campaign had been formidably hurt and maliciously maligned by Obama's belief he could run on a different set of rules then are outlined by requirements in the Constitution.
When lawyers who have been told over and over and over again they have to have a petitioner who has "standing", or in other words are hurt by the action very directly and thereby substantiating good cause that a restraining order is sought for, what makes them think they don't? I don't get it.
It hurts the whole Birther movement accept for accounting for negative publicity. That should be the first line of offense for a plaintiff, not the best defense for the defendant. I am sorry for the money Orly spent and her effort, because I had hoped for the Constitution.
However,WE in the Birther movement have known and do understand the "standing" argument, made very clear or if we don't we should know greater standing is achieved with a presidential candidate straight from O's defense lawyers.
You know what. I've been involved in some 13 case in the Birther Movement and none of mine have been dismissed because I lacked "standing". That should tell people something. The most important or acknowledged pronunciation of judgement coming out of any case I've been involved in was either a 'guilty' verdict as happened in the CIA COLUMBIA OBAMA SEDITION AND TREASON TRIAL or , a ruling that in fact over ruled with the 14th Amendment the demand for a natural born citizen made in Article II, Section I, Clause 5 in direct violation of construction laws prohibiting that action.
This is what is being heard tomorrow in conference of the United States Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama 12-5276.
The worst part of this is not being able to be a fly on the wall in the conference.I won't ever know what Justices voted to hear the case and which voted against hearing the case. Every member of the Supreme Court of the United States will be there, its not just a single justice of the United States Supreme Court, they will all vote thumbs up or thumbs down to hear this case. I need a majority of the Court to give me a thumbs up to hear it. I need 5 thumbs up of the 9 Justices.
Just as a refresher course "standing" is best understood by the following three criteria:
Standing requirements
There are three standing requirements:
1-Injury: The plaintiff must have suffered or imminently will suffer injury—an invasion of a legally protected interest that is concrete and particularized. The injury must be actual or imminent, distinct and palpable, not abstract. This injury could be economic as well as non-economic.
2-Causation: There must be a causal connection between the injury and the conduct complained of, so that the injury is fairly traceable to the challenged action of the defendant and not the result of the independent action of some third party who is not before the court.
3-Redressability: It must be likely, as opposed to merely speculative, that a favorable court decision will redress the injury.
In light of this one can understand how being competitively in a race with a campaign that is hurt or maliciously maligned with another candidates fraudulent practices in the race can account for a sincere standing.
If the Court refuses to hear my case tomorrow it won't be because of 'standing' that's for sure. A negative response may be purely political rather than suited on constitutional principle.
The standard pillar which stands center court in our Constitution as a principle is the qualification that the President be a natural born citizen. If foreign influence can perpetrate the Office of the President the affect is no less than having a nuclear bomb at the center of the Constitution.
Its easy to remember with the New Year being 2013, that 13 of the 48 pages of The Constitution pamphlet are referenced to the President, far outweighing any other constitutional principle by at least 10 to 1.
What does that say to you if for instance you wanted to destroy the Constitution? What office do you do it through?
A great spectacle has taken place in front of the America populous just the last 3 weeks over what? 435 Members of the House of Representatives 100 U.S. Senators and how many in the Executive Branch- One - have positioned themselves over the U.S. Economy.
Obama upped the ante from 800 Billion to 1.6 Trillion. Obama effectively just beat the hell out of 435 Representatives who were shaking in their seats with fear that they would be saddled with the blame if the largest tax increase in history went into affect.
Rush Limbaugh's side kick announced yesterday, that Republicans were no longer the party of tax cuts. They have effectively ponied up to the Democrats and done so after repeated kicks to the groin in which a condition of blue-balls was developed. Having a case of blue balls is often worse then the case of not having any at all.
One wonders why on Earth the new Republican House doesn't throw down the Constitutional gauntlet and open up investigations into the eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama rather then fighting with one hand tide behind their back continually?
The Electoral Votes are being counted and Objections to the Vote could open up such an investigation. I have standing and would be happy to testify in front of Congress of the malign done to me and my campaign for President due to the "rules" that Obama has run under verses the "rules" the rest of us have run under.
You know, many times in our department of justice things happen that aren't or don't seem fair to one or more persons. Some guy gets off with a technicality that we have to honor because if we didn't it would deprive others of the same right. Sir William Blackstone himself said famously- 1765 " It is better to let 10 guilty go free than to let 1 innocent suffer" and I agree.
What the Untied States Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama 12-5276 and Congress is deliberating in Obama's ineligibility however is justice for every American, not just Obama. Every America is being affected by our economy and payroll tax increases, income tax increases, wither it be by a job that is not created because that money is sent in, or wither it is from the shrinking of one's business rather than the expansion.
Those who are wealthy from assets are not really going to be affected that much, so if your rich already kudos to you. Raising taxes on income may have been the surest way to shrink an economy that was immediately available. The Constitution's eligibility demand for the Office of the President to be a "natural born citizen" may be the surest way to shrink Obama's pen that is immediately available.
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
Cody Robert Judy for President
Plaintiff/ SCOTUS Case No. JUDY v. OBAMA 12-5276 www.codyjudy.us www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODY JUDY
FEC REGISTERED http://fec-candidates.findthedata.org/l/4426/Judy-Cody-Robert
Candidate ID P20003372
Committee ID C00501593
America No Games Just You- CRJ Election Challenge 2012
America provides opportunity, so many choices that are important to women, and encompasses a mixing pot in America of many diverse people. To keep America happy she simply ask you pay her a visit once in while and adhere to the Constitution's demand for a natural born citizen in the Office of the President.
“Mr. President, it is natural to man to indulge in the illusions of hope. We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth, and listen to the song of that siren till she transforms us into beasts. Is this the part of wise men, engaged in a great and arduous struggle for liberty? Are we disposed to be of the number of those who, having eyes, see not, and, having ears, hear not, the things which so nearly concern their temporal salvation? For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst, and to provide for it….
“Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!”
Speech at St. John’s Church, Patrick Henry, March 23, 1775
Winston Churchill saved England, Europe,from enslavement by the Third Reich and these words of his are poignant:
"If you will not fight for the right when you can easily win without bloodshed; if you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a small chance of survival. There may even be a worse case: you may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves."
Let me take this time to wish everyone of you, a very Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, and while I know this may be far from Holiday Cheer, it is the appreciation for Holidays, for the freedom to celebrate in the spirit our beloved Constitution provides me that keeps me urging you towards more courtesy towards it.
God Bless America and may his grace penetrate the darkest corners and allow the light to shine upon this principle for the whole Earth to see that We The People have a case for his judgement, pleading for the peace that accompanies our principles.
Cody Robert Judy
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
BREAKING NEWS UPDATE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT RECEIVES PETITION FOR REHEARING for Writ of Certiorari in Judy v. Obama 12-5276 today!
03112550000022703153
Priority Mail®
Delivered
November 15, 2012, 11:19 am
WASHINGTON, DC 20543
Expected Delivery By:
November 15, 2012
Delivery Confirmation™
WHERE IS THE TEA PARTY NOW ON OBAMA'S ELIGIBILITY?
From a conversation post linked below between Cody Robert Judy and Retired Col. Ronald A. Nelson United States Airforce.
Comment by Ronald A. Nelson Col.USA (Ret) yesterday
Delete Comment
Thanks... but the US Supreme Court will refuse to hear your case indicating that this matter as already been decided by others. By the way... it is Congress that has the Constitutional duty to vet the president for his Constitutional eligibility not the Courts.
It would be better if you sued Congress.. naming the Speaker and President pro-tem as the main defendants for failing to properly vet the President. You might also file suite in every State with the States... Sec. of State... naming the State and the Secretary of State as failing to properly certify Obama as an eligible candidate for President... Most State's voting laws, require that the Secretary of State take reasonable steps to vet all candidates for their qualifications before being placed on their ballots.
Enough said... all of the above has been tried before and without any effective results... that leaves very little option to the public... they can either roll over, allowing their vote to be corrupted by voter and election fraud OR... they could assemble in mass in every State Capitol to demand that the government resign subject to new elections... peaceably, assembling... 10's of millions, shutting down the economy and government until they act to resign... pass a 'Term Limits' amendment denying any elected, serving or past official from ever holding public office anywhere again. But that's not going to happen because the people are simply too lazy... or fearful of loosing their jobs. Wait until the dollar collapses and hyper inflation sets in... there wages will be unable to keep them from starving and being evicted from their homes... it is past time to act in unity... too, demand that both the State and Federal Governments resign subject to new elections.
@Ronald A. Nelson Col. USA (Ret)
Thank you for the time you put in as a response. I really do appreciate that. I have to say Col. your response may be wrong, of course perhaps your betting on the odds, or prophesying, or predicting, whatever you want to call it, but because you are who you are, there can be an amazing amount of people who decide NOT to support this effort. So I have to point out where your wrong. With all due respect Sir your "Thanks" seems insincere and most thanks are when the following word is "But..".
1st paragraph -
Precedent for the court is MINOR V. HAPPERSETT on Natural Born Citizen if you respect Larry Klayman as an attorney- born in the U.S. to Citizen parents. The Supreme Court has never ruled formally against that.
By the way.. Congress is the Legislative Branch of our Government has has repeatedly thrown down the gauntlet in what we would call a Legislative Mandate to uphold that natural born citizen clause. Some 20 attempts in the past to change it have failed. That gives the Judicial Branch a duty to uphold it or call it 'unconstitutional' as indicated in the doc here. Did you read it by chance? If you did you would be 1 of 82 people and 1 of 536 of the second one.
"It would be better if I sued Congress" What? Whose going to be the Judge between me and Congress? Someone in the Judicial Branch? Yes.. so we're back to what I'm doing in the same Court basically. Of course if you read the document then you'd know the Secretary of State of Georgia is included. You'd also know that this eligibility challenge started at the lowest level in the State of New Hampshire and worked its way up to the State Supreme Court. Then I went down to Georgia and started in the lowest level Administrative Court where I finally received a opinion from a judge that basically stated the Natural Born citizen clause didn't apply anymore and the 14th amendment had superseded it violating constitutional construction holdings.
You would know that has NEVER happened before, so that a lower court decision could actually be taken to the higher courts without the issue of 'standing' being the reason for the lower court dismissals.
So your second paragraph is not 'wrong' its just about 10 months behind me, and what's taking place with this suit. In all of the law suits there has never been an active Presidential Candidate who made it to the United States Supreme Court..never. "Standing' is a serious legal issue and must be adhered to I agree, but when Obama's attorney's acknowledge a Presidential Candidate has standing, (along with the 10 Circuit saying from 2011 in the eligibility challenge of 2008 in Keyes (Barnett) v. Obama saying that it must be 'active' , hence my declaration in 2008 2012 and 2016, you'll note the commercial is the first 2016 Pres. Commercial), then you'd acknowledge this case is unique and has at the very least avoided the mistakes of 2008 cases against Obama and most of the 2012 cases on his eligibility. "Competitive standing" separated eligibility cases of Citizens and a presidential candidate.
Your 3rd paragraph-
"All the above has been tried before without effective results.." If my case fails I'll give you that, however lets put your perspective into a military setting. If you'd tried to take a hill from both sides and the front with 3 battalions, what idiot would say when the President asked, "Is there any thing that hasn't been tried yet?", No, its all been tried without effective results?
President: " Well have you tried 4 battalions from every angle? ", "No Sir, we haven't actually tried that, we were sure stupid not to have thought to at least give that a try."
Well, anyway that's how your lack of support makes me feel on this Col. Nelson. You know Mitt Romney gave it a shot from all the 'normal' procedures. He was a good businessman in a troubled economy, but he wanted to play "win the Presidency" without challenging the fundamental Achilles heel of Obama. His eligibility. That's like, let's fight this fight and allow the D's to tie one arm behind our back because we don't have much faith in the Constitution either.
Now the eligibility stand this Tea Party Group took has above all others focused on and accepted has treated my news and case like dirt. Not one post has been sent out by the Directors to the massive list of subscribers...Not one.
Is that because those responsible for updating the members on serious issues, like you didn't believe this was a viable option, or because they were such huge Mitt Romney fans that they became blind to the core of the Constitution the same way Obama would like everyone to be?
I'm not sure both are not true to some extent. What I do know though is IF you have been involved on the eligibility issue like I have from the time I have, which was the beginning in 2008, then you would know with good sense what every court had ruled on every case and for what reasons, and then you would know that my case is 'unique'.
If there is an issue with my case that worries me most its about the Court sweeping my case under the carpet because it doesn't even have the support of the people who are suppose to be supporting it...The Birthers.. the Tea Party... people like Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh..Conservatives.
You know the only problem I see with your logic Col. Nelson is every time you come up with a good idea, you never have to worry about someone else shooting it down.. because you do it yourself.
But.. thanks for the comment Sir.
One more thing, I was the only candidate in 2008 who went to bat for Lt. Col Terry Lakin who lost his retirement after 5 tours as a surgeon. I wrote an Amicus Curiae for his Military Trial.
SUPREME COURT CONTESTED ELECTION UPDATE Judy v. Obama 12-5276
BREAKING NEWS ON THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT CASE JUDY V. OBAMA 12-5276
Dear American Citizens,
God bless you, on Saturday Nov, 10,2012 four days after the Presidential election, I received a letter from the SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES (SCOTUS) signed by Mr. William K. Suter by assistant Gail Johnson saying they had received my MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF WRIT OF CERTIORARI that was postmarked November 1st and received in their office November 7th, 2012.
This would co-inside with the security department of the SCOTUS receiving that document election day Nov 6th about 11am as I reported to you in my report that day. The reason I’m telling you this is to update you that SCOTUS has asked for a revision and re submission within 10 days, which is fantastic news. I’ll explain to you why, mostly because of what my Mom used to say to me.
She used to say to me when I was a kid and still does occasionally, “more words Cody” in an effort to get me to explain something a little more in detail that I may have glossed over and not satisfactorily explaining to her. I wonder sometimes if I’m doing a good enough job for you. Boy, our world sure is changing from a place where balancing “more words” and “getting your point across in one text message” must somehow find a balance.
I will give both the short and the long version. For those of you who want the message in a short form text message here it is:
Text 1-“The Nov. 7th,2012 SCOTUS letter means CODY ROBERT JUDY is still in the Presidential race of 2012 and has not conceded the race- it isn’t over- and Barack Obama has not cleared all the hurdles necessary to be President contrary to what the media would have you believe. You know the Electoral College vote has not happened!
Text 2- “Cody needs your help immediately! Appeals to the U.S. Supreme Court are expensive. The Campaign is tied together with bailing string and fishing line right now- we desperately need new laptop computers- advertising and traveling dollars- and our rent & electricity bill is two months behind and the web site bill is due tomorrow. Please go to www.codyjudy.us and make a contribution now, especially if you were a Mitt Romney voter.
Ok, here’s the long form for those of you who haven’t gone to www.codyjudy.us and made a contribution yet. You know 30% of the Country fought in the Revolutionary War while the other part sat back and watched. I want to address those people who are watching right now… Glenn Beck & Rush.
Yes, I received a notification that Glenn Beck is now following me on Twitter. Just to be fair, Glenn I sent you a notification back and am following you now too, and I’m listening to you right now. Here’s what you’re saying, “ as delicious as pie Obama tax … bla bla bla” you’re talking about the fiscal cliff we’re headed for and a commercial just came on. I wonder silently if Republicans will help or if they are too bitter and would rather sabotage efforts to remove Obama legally in a misguided effort to prove themselves right.
I've have around 4,500 Facebook friends many of whom asked to be my friend because they were interested in being able keep up with the Campaign and the SCOTUS Case Judy v. Obama 12-5276. I honored that and accepted their friendship request. I have 2 questions for those of you who are watching. How do you feel about that? How do you think .., How am I supposed to feel about that?
Feel about what you ask? How am I suppose to feel about your sitting on your hands while I save the Country? You say, “ Who the hell do you think you are Andy Jackson?” I say, “Well, I am the Constitution against Barack Obama. How powerful is that? How powerful should it be?”
I imagine myself in George Washington’s army who crossed the frozen river in the dark of night after losing 13 battles, understanding that he had to win one to get more recruits and to give hope to those who believed in the principles of the Constitution that hadn’t even been written yet, and to quell the nay-sayers who had been doubting Thomas’s and watchers of his Revolutionary efforts. Hello Mitt Romney. How’s your campaign going- Billion dollars later.. And you lost.
If you could have seen the glory of America at a time even before the Constitution had been signed, and you were a “watcher”, how could you not send, how could you withhold a little bit of money to George Washington in order to get one of his soldiers out of the worn socks and boots as you saw the red snow that marked their way?
How can I convey to you the need at this time when victims of Hurricane Sandy are so desperate also, and so many Americans are facing a rough road and are stretching every dollar? I have to, in the faith, belief, and hope that the Constitution is more of a blessing to everyone for this generation and for generations to come. Hurricanes will pass go, but the Constitution or the lack thereof will stay.
My campaign needs laptop computers because ours are limping from being sabotaged, we need really badly to sure up our traveling expense account, completely depleted now. If I was called to Washington DC I’d be walking or hitching a ride.
Could I depend on Glenn Beck or Rush Limbaugh to get me to Washington DC because I have a case against Barack Obama not being qualified, or is their attitude one of .. “We’ll wait and see how the ruling goes first?” How am I supposed to feel about that? How do you feel? Is it just my problem?
The legal Revisions cost money; ask any attorney if they will work for free and the answer is usually no, there will be copy fees, postage and mailing fees, Insurance needs to be paid, web site needs to be paid, electricity is two months now unpaid shall I go on? Ask yourself if you’re enjoying hearing this…ask yourself if Obama’s camp is enjoying hearing this? Whose camp are you in?
Of course I am used to cutting corners and managing the best I can with what our campaign has received, as we have the whole year and a half since the Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign was founded a week before TX. Gov. Rick Perry got into the Presidential race, and truthfully I cannot believe we have had to stay in the race the entire time in order to maintain our ‘standing’.
We have had to, at any time, be ready to replace Obama against Mitt Romney’s campaign. There’s 185 or so Video’s on my YouTube Station, over 250 Blog entries detailing what we've been through, a 100 page web site, and the worst part is America is generally unaware of our campaign or the facts that we were in Iowa, went to New Hampshire clear to the State Supreme Court , in Georgia clear to the State Supreme Court there, and finally, since around July have been furiously working on the United States Supreme Court case Judy v. Obama 12-5276 the mainstream media has been silent about.
One thing I want to convey to you is that none of the commercials I made that had Mitt Romney in them were false, and you know it now ,for sure. Nothing I said or wrote about Mitt Romney was a falsehood.
The Republicans fight without the Constitution didn't work, and in a campaign where the oath of Office demands preserving, protecting, and defending the Constitution, is that at all surprising to you? Did I not tell you unemployment would suddenly dip below 8% just before the election? Did I not tell you Obama controlled the gas reserves and Ohio had gas below $3 dollars a gallon during the election?
Obama is not a ‘natural born citizen’ and as much as all of his supporters would like to say that the qualifications have morphed and a naturalized or 14th Amendment citizen can now run for President, it simply isn't true. Obama is not a natural born citizen by his father, and he’s never proven where he was born. That’s a two prong test, fail one and you can’t be President, fail them both and you still can’t qualify to be President.
Everyone who voted for Obama did not have their vote protected and has been disenfranchised in voting for an ineligible candidate. Now while they may not appreciate my defending their rights, or yours, future generations of America will have a different outlook because hindsight is always 20/20.
I am asking for your help. Future generations will look at you and ask “Why didn’t you help?” Please make a contribution(s) today. If you can’t, please forward this to someone who you think could, or even someone you think should, make contributions today. Send this to every rich person you know. It’s got to get to someone who has 100 million dollars in the bank sooner or later.
Send this to every media outlet you know, with an expression of what you think of them because they have hidden this fight from the American Public.
They have continually swept under the carpet my campaign even though as a Presidential campaign I have Obama in the United States Supreme Court. But, they would cover Mitt Romney’s son in a town at a small campaign event, or Jon Huntsman’s daughters campaigning for their dad with a music video.
Now of course I cannot promise you anything accept that with a contribution to my campaign you will know that you have contributed to a campaign that has and continues to take a stand for the Constitution against Barack Obama’s ineligibility unlike any other campaign in history; against the fraud and forgery of Obama’s identity records investigated by professionals in law enforcement; and a campaign who has fought for you whether you see or like it or not, and is still alive.
If my campaign is successful, Obama will not be in the White House the next four years. If the Supreme Court of the United States determines to hear my case basically in the order of my campaign’s damages due to Obama running and not being qualified, and we win, how will you feel about that?
Please help all of us..by making a contribution now at www.codyjudy.us
We will post exactly how much we have collected because it’s time that you knew exactly what this campaign has done for you with so little help and we want you to join this effort as an American.
It’s also time to shame those who could help and haven’t because America and our Constitution have given them so much… HOLLYWOOD… hint hint ;), and to be seen as so ungrateful as to just watch is almost like applauding a massacre or a extermination of alternative lifestyles order. Without the 1st Amendment Hollywood would be behind bars right now and they know who would like to put them there, but they need to know that if the Constitution dies,…that’s where they will be.
The bottom line is also for those who said "There will NEVER be a RECONSIDERATION" by SCOTUS, you have also now been proven wrong. And for those who keep going to those people who keep telling them I will never be successful, haven't you figured out by now that they fall into two categories either "doubting Thomas's" or those whom I call " bounty hunters", those who really don't want anyone else getting any credit besides themselves about Obama's ineligibility."? We all know them, or should know them anyway and its not so much about the Constitution for them as it is about their professional career.
I will let you know if any of the Bounty Hunters calls me and asks to help pro bono because they sure haven't offered any help so far.
Please enjoy the commercial and understand that I have not quit the 2012 election, but I am also legally under an obligation with certain demands for standing to continue this into 2016 if necessary because what’s filed in Court today might take 3 months to hear and if I step in there and am not a qualified candidate, they will say its ‘moot’.
I AM AMERICAN
So please, make a contribution today. We need $10,000 immediately! Whether that comes from 5 contributors of $2,000 or 1,000 contributors of $10 we need it now…today! Please, please, help us..Help the United States of America.
I will keep you informed and post the document received from SCOTUS this later today or tomorrow.
Now if your one to say, " you know I'd make a contribution today Cody if I knew you were telling the truth about the Supreme Court of the United States and the letter. If you'd just show me the letter I'd believe", then what would you be obligated to do if I showed you the letter?.
The Best Results – Consult The Hard Truth The Constitution Will Win
Why was Barack Obama winning the Election the Best Conservative Result?
The Constitution
Morning after the election- Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh on the radio- I haven’t been a regular listener for quite some time, but I’m impressed. Glenn’s talking about The Constitution – Now and Forever. Rush is talking about the rich being Santa Clause and scratching his head about how Sandy helped Obama.
I wonder if they gets it now? If they get that their words and actions pre- election have been two different things. They weren’t standing up for the Constitution pre-election. They were trembling in fear about the truth of the Constitution’s natural born citizen clause, which is the Pandora’s Box of the Constitution.
It’s this simple, you want to destroy America you do it through the office of the President, and its working.
Glenn is correct about half the Country voting for Mitt Romney and the popular vote being shy for Mitt Romney only by 2 million. Rush is right about Obama being down 10 million votes from 2008 and Republicans still losing by 2 million votes. Who are Birthers?
I wonder if Glenn & Rush remember 10 days ago Donald Trump’s Charity offer for Barack Obama to release his pass port records and college entrance papers for the opportunity to have 5 Million Dollars contributed to any Charity?
Sandy victims could have really used that, but Obama refused and Donald said everyone would know he was right about Obama not being qualified to be President: Everyone but conservative talk show radio host? I don’t want to pick on Glenn and Rush and Sean and Fox but I have to. The writing is on the wall. Read it.
Glenn talks about the sacredness of the Constitution, but I wonder if he even realizes that if Mitt Romney had won last night, all of Obama’s corruption, all of the fraud and forgery represented in Obama’s identity would have passed into the bliss of United States History?
I thought to myself this cannot be. I believe in the long term of history Obama himself will regret ever even asking America to double down on his contortions and twist and fraud of the Constitution.
I believe Obama was close to a spot in history but he got greedy with asking for a second term, just like a thief going for the big ‘safe’ instead of settling for what’s in the till. Two terms is just too much time and the cops are coming and his hands in the cookie jar. He’s going to get caught.
God is indeed waking people up. Did you know I am a part of a Birther Movement that is the backbone of the Constitution? I am a minority in this Country in that I’m a Birther. However, our Constitution is the center of America and we are a Republic.
Do you know that a Republic, based upon the foundation of a Constitution, is not a mob rule democracy? If the majority of a population in a Republic chooses wrong, or is opposed to the Constitution, the majority loses in a Republic.
“I believe the best is yet to come”, Obama said. “Oh yes.. the best is indeed yet to come Obama, but I’m not sure you’re going to think it’s the best.”
The minority can survive in a Republic. Birthers are a minority in the Country, but we are in the right when it comes to the Constitution and Barack Obama not being a natural born citizen, qualified for the Office of the President.
As a minority in this Country, I have the rights engraved in the Constitution to stand against the majority. Any minority in this country should understand this.
Whoever you are as part of a minority in this Country, you have had a place to survive in America. It’s part of the American Dream.
Birthers, people who believed in the Constitution have been ridiculed, scorned, put in a corner, scoffed out, rejected, made fun of, swept under the carpet and worse…and the so called conservative part of this Country has been a part of that political massacre.
How are you feeling about that; conservative radio talk show hosts of America?
Have you seen the light now? Have you thought about joining the Birther movement or have you hardened your hearts further and doubled down on protecting the lies of Barack Obama while at the same time you are horrified by half of America not caring about the lies Barack Obama when it comes to Benghazi, while you and your half continue to sweep the lies of Obama’s identity under the carpet and call Birthers loony.
Do you care that the Dow is down 300 points? Do you care about the economy of this Country, or are you so convinced with the side of the Country your calling ‘defenders of Obama’s lies’, that it’s your way or the highway, the Constitution be damned when it comes to the demand for a natural born citizen in the office of the president of the United States?
If that’s the case Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh receiving every press release from my campaign for a year, please do us all a favor, and print signs that say “The Constitution – Gone - Rejected Here” and hang that up in your offices.
Do you remember from your history lessons in high school that a ‘natural born citizen is a person ‘born in the United States to Citizen parents’ and that Barack Obama is not qualified?
Do you remember that there was an honest Sheriff in the State of Arizona who actually investigated, with people who had professional criminal investigating qualifications, Obama’s lies and that I have a case in the United States Supreme Court with those findings? Will you continue to cover-up for the Usurper?
The truth is you don’t have to look anywhere but in a mirror to understand why Mitt Romney didn't win the election last night. God does not want Barack Obama to go down in history as a President of the United States that endorses fraud and forgery.
Why is that so hard for you to understand?
Are you so dumb that the Bill Clinton slogan, “It’s the economy stupid” is greater the foundation of the Constitution and it’s principles? “It’s the economy, it’s the economy, it’s the economy”, wow, have you underestimated the power of the United States Constitution. Have you underestimated The Birthers? No, No,..It’s not a question.
America has always been a place where minorities could come and feel protected by the Constitution of the United States but everyone who has called Birthers, citizens of this country who simply asked for you to take a stand for the Constitution who are a minority, crazy.
Well if every minority is considered ‘crazy’ by the GOP, based on the stand the GOP has taken with Obama endorsing his fraud and forgery and identity theft and obfuscation, then why would God reward them with the White House?
Take a minute and assume the best God position you can and ask yourself if the vision of this Country includes the Chief of the Executive Branch, not being qualified according to the Constitution.
13 of the 48 pages of The Constitution booklet are referenced to the Office of the President. Why am I telling you this Glenn , Rush, Sean, GOP.. Mitt Romney.
I think Mitt Romney is a ‘good guy’ too, but what choice did he give God?
He was sweeping the devils work under the carpet.. Mitt Romney was. Yeah, Mitt Romney didn't belief me. He said in the most doubting Thomas voice you can imagine.. “Come on Cody”.
Well, just imagine a minute an election without Barack Obama? Now tell me if the principles of the Constitution endorsed fraud and forgery when it comes to the qualification demands of the office of the President.
Can half the Country even VOTE for Barack Obama if he’s not on the Ballot?
Can the GOP do a better job at “endorsing amnesty”, “endorsing redistribution of the wealth’, ‘destroying businesses’, ‘covering everyone with mandates on health care’, and ‘raising taxes’ then the Democrats? I don’t think so!
Can the GOP do a better job at taking a stand for the Constitution? I sure think so, unfortunately I think the GOP is gone, and Gov. Mitt Romney along Sen. John McCain as Party nominees for President have destroyed their party beyond repair. Being President of the U.S. is much more than being a “Good Guy”.
Delivered to the United States Supreme Court Nov. 6th, 2012 at 11:05AM
03112550000022697667
Priority Mail®
Delivered
November 06, 2012, 11:05 am
WASHINGTON, DC 20543
Expected Delivery By:
November 3, 2012
Delivery Confirmation™
Every American should be very happy that this action, Judy v. Obama 12-5276, was not made "moot" by a Mitt Romney win.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/100156244/Judy-v-Obama-Petition-for-Writ-of-Certiorari-Revision-per-U-S-Clerk-Case-Analyst-Appendix-Stamped-Orders-Included
Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODY JUDY CODE4PRES
Obama 2016 - The 'ACTION' of 'INACTION' Obama Voting Present
As also seen on - TEA PARTY.ORG
http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/obama-2016-the-action-of-inaction-obama-voting-present
As an Illinois Senator Obama voted 'present' effectively side-stepping a "Ayes" or "Nays" vote some one hundred and thirty times in order to stay in the good graces of his constituents and his future political career which was, make no mistake, orchestrated.
Obama is also M.I.A as a constitutionally qualified president. Obama is not a natural born citizen which has been been interpreted by the Congress as a legislative mandate over 225 years, born in the United States to Citizen parents on the record by literally examining the fact that its never been over turned in our history while its been attempted over 24 times.
One thing most people agree on is that the purpose of the 'natural born citizen' clause is to protect the nation from foreign influence. Americans hold the work of the Founding Fathers in such reverence that they've added to it only 17 times since 1791.
Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., a Judiciary committee member, sees merit in the restriction and said in 2004, "I don't think it is unfair to say the president of the United States should be a native-born citizen," she said at the hearing. "Your allegiance is driven by your birth."
Republican U.S. Senator Orrin Hatch-R from Utah said in October 2004,"The restriction on the foreign-born "has become an anachronism that is decidedly un-American."
Maria Shriver Kennedy at one time supported her husband Republican Arnold Schwarzenegger pushing for a constitutional amendment that would allow the Austrian-born 2004 California governor to run for the White House as soon as 2008.
As we see UT. R. Sen Orrin Hatch's proposed amendment failed in 2004, Maria (Kennedy) Shriver filed divorce to Schwarzenegger in 2011 for infidelity but as of July 2012 the divorce isn't final, and another 2008 candidate who isn't a natural born citizen duped Americans running and successfully usurped the White House in 2008.
If you haven't seen the conservative documentary of the decade stunning Hollywood Obama's present from Rocky Mountain Pictures, "Obama 2016", you need to go see it. I took my mother this last Friday even as the hour and twenty-nine minute documentary was expanding from its modest handful of movie screens to 1,900 screens nation wide earning another $5.1 million of its now 18.3 million.
Its an interesting side-note that Michael Moore producer of No. 1-ranked "Fahrenheit 9/ 11," which topped $119 million leading documentaries all time, this last week told Democrats to get used to the words "President Romney".
The foreboding feeling you feel walking out of Obama 2016 with the audience is worth the price of the ticket. To tell you the truth I personally was relieved to be able to sit quite next to my mom and let someone else do the talking as there have been many a family argument over the work I've been engaged in since 2008 suing McCain and Obama in 2008 on the eligibility issue as a candidate for President and continuing the stand in 2012 as a Democrat Presidential Candidate.
While I don't say this in justification of failure in the home,there's probably more then a truth or two about my last two marriages ending because of taking a stand for the Constitution in political races that ended unsuccessfully with the finances of my family in a crisis - the reality of underfunded campaigns for any candidate.
The truth of any political race is there is only one winner, and no matter how many people vote for the second place finisher, all the funds, all the votes, all the hoopla for the campaign doesn't make that campaign any better than the least voted candidate with the most under-voted campaign- it's still a loss and a calculable failure.
This brings me to the crux of this blog that is actually a question for everyone to ask themselves.
If Mitt Romney is unwilling to fight Obama on the grounds of the Constitutional demands of qualification for the Office of the President, allowing the usurpation, allowing the history to go down without justice to the fraud and forgery Obama has been apart of with the cover-up, spewing out false identification documents according to law enforcement investigations documented in my case Judy v. Obama now set for conference in the United States Supreme Court Sept. 24th, 2012, allowing Obama to build his presidential library and dis-honoring American culture with shocking racism sending blacks back to a time before color television, then how do you suppose Romney is going to preserve, protect and defend America's Constitution any more then Obama has?
And if Romney is not going to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution any better the Obama, what makes your vote for Romney worth the disgrace to God for setting America aside as a peculiar nation of a distinct Republic for which we Americans stand?
While I would not base my vote on any man or women's religious preference, there are some who do. In my opinion one of the finest distinctions in America is the freedom of conscience in America, let them worship who, what, or how they may, for that is the ultimate test of your own religious freedom here in America.
Saying you wouldn't vote for a "Mormon" is just as easily said about any other religion that is a minority at any given point and is not representative of the United State's Congress Standards outlined in the Constitution, which are chosen by We The People as our Representatives and Senators.
God knows they let us down as the electorate reported the election in 2008 and their popularity has shown this sinking to an all time low, however the legislative mandate has stood the test of time not to allow any but a "Natural Born Citizen", or a "Citizen" before the ratification of the Constitution, to become President.
With that said and understanding Obama was not born before the Constitution was ratified, a "Natural Born Citizen" is born in the United States to at the very least parents who are "Citizens", or "Natural Born Citizens" themselves.
I believe Dr. Pastor James David Manning makes a credible argument for justice in the following video, as Obama did in legislative session 130 times,by simply voting present when it comes to the President by writing my name in on your ballot
"Cody Judy", if the Democrats and Republicans and United States Supreme court refuses to demand justice for the honor of black people, white people, yellow people and any color of people in America.
You absolutely do not need to disgrace yourself before your God, or higher power, by voting for a lesser of two evils, and I do believe that in this case "inaction" or something that appears futile,ultimately can be seen as 'action' to protect the way that God or your higher power, thinks about you if you think that is relevant and important to you.
Talking to Iowans Obama this week said something to the affect "that their is always a choice and Americans were gonna have to make one", and Pastor Manning makes it a credible argument here, which has in large part not been articulated by any religious figure in America, that voting for the lesser of two evils is not voting for principle that makes a bit of sense.
So, I'll say you don't have to "not vote" for anyone, you can always write-in my name Cody Judy understanding no other qualified candidate on the ballot has stood up for and taken a stand against Obama's Eligibility other than me, as actually your present to Obama.
Perhaps Obama would win, but perhaps he will win anyway, and perhaps you will look better to your God in not choosing the lesser of two evils, and simply just choosing someone who took a stand and took it to the U.S. Supreme Court. They may be the highest court we can see in America, but I believe there is one above them in the heavens; that in Gods hands.
If Obama were to win in America in 2012 perhaps it will be the lesson needed to the majority who put him there, from God, to make of you Patriots of Freedom and Liberty like nothing else would. I know being enslaved myself 8 years as a prisoner of a usurped Constitution by the majority in Utah and the deaf ear of the United States Supreme Court for evidence held by the Presidency of the Mormon or LDS Church, that I became a Patriot of our Constitution like I had never been before.
Then by God your prayers would reach into the heavens and I think that while God might be slow to hear you he would, by the bloodiest revolution America has ever pondered, set your free again, and by that you wouldn't forget it for 1000 years.
In God's mind, perhaps the greatest lesson to the greatest amount of people, is the best lesson anyway and by that standard I sure wouldn't put it past him, in my own religious sentiment.
So, minus the words that voting for a "Mormon" is a no can do, and perhaps inserting the understanding that voting for a President who has taken a stand against Obama's eligibility consistently since 2008 is a must, here is Dr. James David Manning's articulate report on that matter that rings truth in the matter of apposing a political loss for Obama because he still gets the pension and the presidential library, and the obamanation of history I am apposed to as my founding fathers in America were also.
BIRTHERISM IS AMERICAN EXCEPTUALISM- Mitt Romney apologizes for America.
Yesterday Barack Obama's Camp flew a Banner over Mitt Romney's gathering that said, "America is better then Birtherism", though misspelled the Romney Camp refused to take the Constitution on its demand for a natural born citizen for the office of the President seriously, and instead of sounding a resolute, "Democrats better have a qualified candidate if I'm made the nominee", Romney couched and didn't have the courage for the Constitution that is requisite with someone's character to hold the office.
This basically was an apology for America, which Mitt was on record of accusing Barack Obama for doing; apologizing for America's Constitution? What kind of a leader would do such a thing about our Constitution?
Citizens wonder what kind of character it takes to be President? Well, this was a perfect example of the kind of character that would not be a good example ,or leader, or voice, or defender for the preservation, protection, and defense of the Constitution as the oath requires.
If Mitt Romney can not stand against Barack Obama in simply demanding our Constitution be upheld for the office of which he is running outlined by the Constitution, that is taking a stand for American Exceptualism, how would he ever be able to protect America's national security against enemies foreign?
Cody Robert Judy has taken a stand for America and her Constitution against Barack Obama's slander at American exceptualism of which Birtherism is so intertwined and is on record with the United States Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama Case no. 12-5276 for the defense of our Constitution. This is the kind of character we need for our President and Cody is running for President in the Democratic Party looking for the nomination of his party in Charlotte, North Carolina.
Enjoy the latest Commercial- BIRTHERISM AMERICAN EXCEPTUALISM
Mitt Romney has declined on the Constitution to represent the qualifications of the President. Barack Obama doesn't like the Constitution because he's not a natural born citizen as is represented in SCOTUS Judy v. Obama 12-5276 from the Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign.
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign www.codyjudy.us www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODE4PRES
The Founders of America invested their life's and fortunes in America. Mitt Romney has invested in the Cayman Islands. Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign points out that American Banks are Federally Insured, so if you believe in America invest in America. Taking savings outside the U.S.- is that a Republican trickle down economics principle?
Also, as Mitt Romney's rally was sabotaged by Obama's fly-over, please note Cody Robert Judy isn't the only campaign with spelling errors. Obama's team with a fly over that said, "America is better then Birtherism" was a laughing stock of the crowd as most realized it should have been a "than".
Rather then dig in on the long form birth certificate fabrication Mitt Romney again sides with Obama making the sign that Obama put up true in Romney's eyes, and again just another example of Mitt Romney NOT believing in America or her Constitution that an American President swears to uphold.
At least Cody Robert Judy believes in the Constitution and has Obama in the United States Supreme Court Judy v. Obama Case No. 12-5276. Romney doesn't care about the Constitution any more than Obama does, both men's defense of the Constitution illustrated plainly in the banner of Obama's and banner remark by Romney.
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign www.codyjudy.us www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODE4PRES
FOR IMMEDIATE PRESS RELEASE:
Commemorating Memorial Day in honoring our Military personnel, those who have died, been injured, and those who are fighting for the United States Constitution I am excited to release this new song and video, 'The Lion's Share".
In creating this song, and feeling myself to be kind of an instrument from which this music and creation came, I was moved to depict two things:An honor for military's service and and honor for America's good deeds.
So many times the chain reaction of good deeds is unnoticed and I wanted to depict that chain reaction which is amplified clear up to the Constitution of the United States and the honor we as Americans have living under it as The Supreme Law of the Land.
This song is not fiction but a story that is true much of it happening in one day. The song is a celebration of gratitude.
Happy Memorial Day - Enjoy!
The LION'S SHARE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Go5aQm8kBE
The Lion's Share is an Original Song by The Cody Robert Judy band saluting the Military fighting men and women for America and the United States Constitution, as well as America's good heart and willingness to help others. Released on Memorial Day, May 28th,2012.
Cody Robert Judy
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODE4PRES
Its imperative that the U.S. Supreme Court get this in a timely fashion or the U.S.C is roughly delegated to the lower courts who have obstructed justice by not dealing with Sheriff Joe Arpaio's Cold Case Posse Investigation results.
If Barack Obama is allowed to become the nominee of the Democratic Party before the U.S. Supreme Court gets a chance to rule upon his eligibility it places the Court in an even more difficult political question, and no one knows that better than Barack Obama. You all saw exactly what Obama's comments were to the U.S. Supreme Court over the Health Care case going on now essentially telling the Court to not stick their nose in a political referendum, Constitution be damned.
I believe a Court of Last resort is in fact the last court that I can deal with before the U.S. Supreme Court gets shafted out of being able to decide an important question prior to a major political party choosing a nominee that is unqualified.
The U.S. Supreme Court is the Court that needs to rule on this issue before its too late. The requirement the Clerk put on me to go to Georgia Supreme Court first effectively could place the case another 6 months in that court and take the U.S. Supreme Court out of action. I did in fact also cite the New Hampshire Supreme Court case pending, so its not as if I'm not in a State Supreme Court now all ready, which the U.S. Supreme Court can take also.
The U.S. Supreme Court can on its own accord decide if a case is of such imperative public importance they need to hear it, that deals with the United States Constitution. That's what the Petition is, but the Justices have to at least see it before they can make a decision. That's why interference by the Court clerks can gum up that process.
Bottom line I'm not suppose to have to argue with Clerks on the merits of "imperative public importance', that's for the Justices to decide.
I also put together a couple of songs and a video for the occasion. Hope you enjoy it and pass it along.
