The First Trip of Trump might be Floating Cruz as Eligible V.P.?

The First Trip of Trump might be Floating Cruz as Eligible V.P?

Everyone, including Trump now, seems to think the 'Birther/Eligibility' Question is off the table. When asked by a reporter directly Trump referred to it an 'old subject' after NBC's Katy Turr asked why people should believe his numbers on illegal immigration when he 'led' the birther movement and sent investigators out to Hawaii to investigate whether Obama was was born there, [Read more at http://www.birtherreport.com/2015/07/nbc-news-trump-resurrects-birther-issue.html#Ktebl90di3mIvrcj.99. ]
 but we are reminded everyday it is a very important part of the Constitution of the United States and often the Main Stream Media highlights it reminding us they understand it quite well.

TRUMP TO NBC : Alot of People don't believe the Birth Certificate is Real

Ted Cruz and Donald Trump meet Wednesday in New York

On the heels of that interview, it is reported this morning in the Washington Post U.S. Senator Ted Cruz and Mr. Trump also a Presidential Candidate contender may be making an informal compromise on the Constitution's demand for a natural born Citizen based  on Cruz's defense for Trumps stand on 'illegal immigration'. Cruz fails the standard of natural born Citizen just as Obama both having 'foreign' fathers. Cruz's father is noted as a Cuban while Obama's is listed as Kenyan.

The only citizenship status definition for naturalization purposes most notably missing in Congress's definition  found in the "Aliens and Nationals Title 8 Act" is 'born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents. This is presumably because it has never been doubted that 'Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents' was indeed a respect for man's recognition of 'nature's definition' being indisputable.

Those apposed to the clear definition have seized on the fact that 'natural born Citizen' was not defined in the Constitution, leaving out the fact that neither was 'Citizen', the standard for U.S. Senators and U.S. Representatives along with 'pirating' also found in the Constitution.  According to the Aliens and Nationals Title 8 §1401 Code there are no less than ten (10) different circumstances of Citizenship considered that the Constitution failed to identify or outline understood in a-h.

 'Being Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents' is the requirement that you will not find in the Title 8 Actions of naturalization , and thus was reserved for the Vice President and President as a requirement. U.S. Senator Ted Cruz's naturalization is described by Congress in(d):

 [a person born outside of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is a citizen of the United States who has been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year prior to the birth of such person, and the other of whom is a national, but not a citizen of the United States;] , [i]f of course Cruz's mother did not also become a Canadian Citizen at the same time as her husband did immigrating from Cuba. 

If Cruz's mother and father were registered current Canadian Citizens at the time of  Cruz birth in Canada his 'American Citizenship' is as questionable in documentation as Arnold Schwarzenegger  born to foreign parents in Austria. The interesting claim Sen. Cruz makes is that regardless of his mother's devotion to her husbands' citizenship in Canada, and whether she acclimated to Canada as he did with his citizenship from Cuba, is that regardless of that perhaps being a fact she was "born" in the U.S. and maintained the native citizenship regardless of any foreign paperwork regarding official status. This claim would not bode well for Sen. John McCain who was born in the foreign country of Panama  as I maintained in my action barring him from the Office of the President due to an unfaltering statement of nature that Panama would always be where it began for him instead of the United States. He will always be a Panama son, and certainly one of their more famous.

Reference and Respect for both of one's parents and place has been forgotten to cheat in the race for President of the United States. At this point in the race, Mr. Trump ought to be suing Mr. Cruz in Federal Court for being in the race illegally and collecting campaign contributions for an Office he is not qualified for.

While the Main Stream Media will not let Mr. Trump forget he led the Birther Movement, although not a single case in Court bears Mr. Trumps name and it has been myself who has born the Standard on a bi-partisan level, the highlights of Mr. Cruz's 'citizenship status' in the Washington Post relays the message that Mr. Trump is not true to that standard that he placed upon Mr. Obama in objecting to his eligibility in Office.

Of course the Trump's Campaign is new, but the fact he complained about Obama's Qualification is seasoned back to 2012. It is therefore a poor excuse for him to not public excoriate Mr. Cruz for his ineligibility. The failure to do so, certainly does not bode well for him in conservative circles or the Main Stream Media's 'standard policy' of asking politicians about the double standard.

The question remains how long will the Main Stream Media allow Mr. Trump's money to affect the political tides before putting the ax to the tree and watching Mr. Trump fall from number one in the Polls to out of the running completely. Doesn't it seem odd to you to see the Democratic Party *welcome Mr. Trump into the Republican Presidential Race with a hearty recommendations, and yet still see that it's Mr. Bush that Mrs. Clinton's **campaign is worried about with the Main Stream Media lauded by Podesta Hillary's Campaign Chairman,  as in the palm of her hand?

What a cozy relationship for them.  Can you think of a greater accolade the Main Stream Media craves as being a puppet for Hillary?

CHRISTIANS WITHHOLDING SUPPORT RECEIVE WARNING!

While it may be a very controversial subject, I feel it is very important subject to bring up and one that is also much more difficult than bringing up the qualifications for the Office of the President, if you can imagine one in our current circumstances. There are many 'religious prophesies, predictions, revelations' floating about in the political arena of the United States. Of course religious sentiment is protected free speech and should be.

The subject of such I wish to contend are those advocating that there will be no 2016 Election. That war, famine, and natural catastrophic events will engulf the United States due to subjects separating  the Republican and Democratic Parties such as 'pro-life or pro-choice', same-sex or equal citizenship marriage protections stances among all. I have to say to you these claims are false and those feeling their strategy of standing on one side or the other on these issues merits some 'protection' from what they feel are God's Judgments that are coming are indeed fooled by the spirits.

It would no more seem rational for the good Lord to bring such disasters upon us now for such then it would have 20 or even 40 years ago as the issues were contended back then. What is undeniably has far as change is concerned is 'both' the Republicans and Democrats near universal support of the very simple line drawn on 'natural born Citizen' as 'born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents as the subject nearly all know about but truly only a handful have actually supported as an imperative of our national security.

As the spirit directs me strongly, to the language of our first President George Washington's statement 1792 concerning this:
" I am sure there never was a people, who had more reason to acknowledge a divine interposition in their affairs, than those of the United States; and I should be pained to believe, that they have forgotten that agency, which was so often manifested during our revolution, or that they failed to consider the omnipotence of that God, who is alone able to protect them." (The Writings of George Washington, by John C. Fitzpatrick, GPO, 1931-44. Vol. 32:2.)

Consider for yourselves every person who has contributed to the only Presidential Campaign offering support in the defense of our national security, regardless of Republican or Democratic Parties, for there is only one Campaign over the last 6 years in the Nation who stands supreme upon the principle of the defense spoken of very clearly here.

It is a very foolish spirit that directs as unsound the seriousness of the national security problem we now face or the whimsical loftiness the much greater unity of both the republican, democratic, as well as independent political affiliations together have nearly bonded against and tendered this simple phrase almost in a non-nonsensical manner.

It therefore comes upon me to assure its importance above any and all other considerations. As the nucleus of our Constitution, there is little doubt among scholars of its vital importance. Posed as the foundation of our freedom's our Constitution is the umbrella of countless rights and privileges, and at the heart the President's powers and the principle candidly sacrificed.

Will not be God's punishment, but the umbrella you have refused, in the storm that gets you. President Washington's words are as true today as they were when penned. Tis only God that alone can protect you and upon that we have survived thus far under the Constitution as the Title of Liberty and Standard of Freedom.

When the heart of it is sacrificed by the greatest majority unanimously, a supercilious manner accredited upon myself as seriously defending it in a historic bi-partisan manner, by that you shall know why the Judgments you have spoken of shall fall justly upon you and not by any other stand you have made in a pretended righteousness that shall exempt you. To those very few who have contributed, with monetary support or even passing it in social media, you have more of promise from God than any act understood to lay claim upon such as Pres. Washington refers,  because it is the greatest act in defense for freedom and liberty upon the most.

That means you deserve the promises. May God Bless You and for those who wish to join us that choice is still available to you.  You may support this effort and or pass it on. Here.

CRJ

* Democratic Party Response to Trump here and here.
1- "Everything is awesome," - Democratic National Committee Press Secretary Holly Shulman
2-“Today, Donald Trump became the second major Republican candidate to announce for president in two days. He adds some much-needed seriousness that has previously been lacking from the GOP field, and we look forward [to] hearing more about his ideas for the nation.”

**Why Hillary is worrying about Jeb Bush
John Podesta, Chairman of the 2016 Hillary Clinton Campaign, has already decided that Governor Jeb Bush will be the Republican nominee for President.
[“psychosis of the media . . .which is something we created.” He added with a humble chuckle ]
[ Podesta quipped at one point, “Let’s face it– our strategy always seems to work.” Then he told the person he was chatting with that “they [Hillary’s campaign team] had spent all weekend talking about strategy.”]
[ limit his media interviews like Hillary’s been doing. If he must do an interview here or there, Jeb should consent only to request from conservative press –just as Hillary did when she cherry-picked CNN to do her first “unserious” interview. Fewer interviews means less ammunition for the liberal media to use to harpoon Jeb, should he become the 2016 GOP nominee. Let’s face: the verbal bullets are going to fly from Republicans at one another starting August when the first GOP debate is scheduled.]

You get to decide that. I'd say don't trust bad legal advice and contribute what you can TODAY FOR A BETTER AMERICA TOMORROW

Cody Robert Judy- Presidential Candidate '08-'12-'16

www.codyjudy.us

Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION

1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts

12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial

13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008

14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case

15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016

The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President

www.codyjudy.us

www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.

INSPIRING - I believe in You

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7d-FcfeCPlI

Polygamy - Amnesty's Advocate or Enemy - In search of Citizens

Amnesty’s Enemy: Polygamy – In search of Citizens
This post is proving popular so I thought I'd include here Dec 15,2013 an interesting development that is happening in the Courts JUDGE CITES SAME-SEX MARRIAGE IN DECLARING POLYGAMY BAN UNCONSTITUTIONAL
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/12/14/Federal-Judge-Rules-Laws-Against-Polygamy-Unconstitutional

Gleaming about the irony of the United States Senate’s passage of the Amnesty Dream Act which would indeed naturalize some 17 million illegal aliens with a swoop of a pen and the scowling abstention of the practice of polygamy already legal and practiced in ¾ of the world In search of Citizens to pay taxes and support entitlement programs like Social Security, Medicare, Disability, Obamacare, Welfare Food Stamp programs, and let’s not forget vote “Democratic Party”, the truth is Congress continues to play the magic act of realizing Americans are not having children like they used to, America’s entitlement programs are in serious trouble hence the search of Citizens, yet they criticize in the Edmunds and Edmunds-Tucker Act, supported by Reynolds v. U.S. (1875) the practice of polygamy and a supposedly forced independence of women.

Have you heard the desperation plea in the advertisements yet for Amnesty, oh I mean, "Conservative Immigration Reform"? We’ll build hundreds of miles of fence, arm the borders with every weapon known to man, not let naturalized citizens go on welfare, make them learn English, pay fines, and the list goes on and on- but please please.. please..for God’s sake, let us have 17 million Citizens just this once and pass Amnesty sponsored by Marco Rubio and Paul Ryan and of course lets not forget about John McCain and Orrin Hatch? ( I laugh so hard when I hear that add it’s so pretentious.)



Under the deal brokered last week by Republican Sens. John Hoeven of North Dakota and Bob Corker of Tennessee and the Gang of 8, the measure requires 20,000 new Border Patrol agents, the completion of 700 miles of fencing and deployment of an array of high-tech devices along the U.S.-Mexico border. Question is how can they implement the toughest enforcement measures in the history of the United States when they can't enforce the law on the books now? Isn't it time we started talking about the real problem and the reason Congress both conservatives and liberals are freaked out right now and giddy over amnesty?

Someone’s going to have to pay for the retiring baby boomer generations and these Senators know it., As R- Gov. Jeb Bush so elegantly applauded in the MSM (main stream media) a recent speech stated in affect,the U.S. economy needs the labor of young immigrants, and immigrants are “more fertile.”“Immigrants are more fertile, and they love families, and they have more intact families, and they bring a younger population. Immigrants create an engine of economic prosperity.”

While quite an earned compliment one must continual ask what’s so special about America that so many actually want to come here rather than maintain and build up Mexico as their country? In short what is Congress offering and why won’t Mexico, or other countries simply adopt America’s Constitution and just ask to become the 51st State? Understanding the fertility of a population necessarily is requisite of good government", is that it Jeb?

Don't think Amnesty is a desperate attempt for Citizens to "pay up?" A Census report released Thursday showed that, for the first time, white deaths in the United States outnumbered white births. Population grew because of growth among Hispanics, African-Americans and immigrants. Yet Congress remains opposed to Polygamy? Do you sense a little hypocrisy here in outlawing polygamy?

Not many remember the John Taylor, President of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints (Mormon LDS) 3rd in line from the Founder Joseph Smith Jr. ,words “ One backwards step, and the time will come when the greatest enemy of the principle (polygamy) is the Church itself” , speaking on the Christian practice of polygamy. Is polygamy more founded in Christian doctrines or in Mormon doctrines?

What a funny notion to think that Mormon’s were the key witness of Polygamy in the doctrines of Jesus Christ, due to such a small century of practice by Mormons, when the roots of the practice are traced back to Christian prophets of the Bible the likes of which many would recognize in Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Moses, David, and Solomon. It seems even the occasional passerby of the Christian Bible would somehow gather that this practice or principle was one certainly steeped in Christianity, if those reading the Bible are considered such? Indeed the LDS/Mormon Church Authority has literally become as John Taylor prophesied and enemy rather than an advocate to the Christian principle.

Glenn Beck today ( June 27th,2013) somehow managed to collaborate that passage of same-sex marriage as related to a recent Gay Marriage ruling finding DOMA unconstitutional was indeed the foundation for the argument of polygamy and promised to get someone on the show tomorrow that could formulate that argument who practiced or was an advocate of polygamy. I’m almost certain we won’t be hearing from any member of Congress tomorrow on the subject.

However, isn’t it the most modern day fashion that while opposing Amnesty one would also oppose polygamy where Glenn Beck undoubtedly placed his foot? Talk about clash of the Titans in your wardrobe.

Let’s see, you oppose legalizing polygamy under the guise of what undoubtedly is the bottom of the barrel reporting statistics of those at the bottom of the barrel actual practicing it? Wow! I mean how stupid can you get? How inclined to hypocrisy are you?

Consider the reverse for just one moment. Consider the top of the barrel actually practicing polygamy and the picture it creates. Let’s formulate a little hypothesis:

Less women and children on the welfare dole of the Government Food Stamp line because George Soros, Mitt Romney and Donald Trump and Glenn Beck have opened their doors and can support 25 wives apiece very easily along with the 5 children each wife has. Each man has 125 children bringing the total number of souls transferred from dependency on the State to contributors of the State to 525. Not a bad ratio and a definite realization there is a difference in male and female in case you forgot there was, biologically speaking of course.

Not only did you deplete the welfare state you also substantially beefed up the contributions to the State! Its like a double whammy in the positive direction. It’s like one giant leap for mankind.

Now if you times that with just the top money making 25% of you, one actually rolls the United States out of the black and into the red, out of the debt and into the positive, in a single generation without Amnesty. The hypocrisy of those opposing Amnesty on one hand and opposing polygamy on the other knows no bounds and it’s a very good reason why you can’t trust the Republican Party as far as you can throw them.

Now if Amnesty passes, there is also a good chance that those steeped in the Christian doctrines of the Democratic Party inclusion process advocating the legalization of Gay Marriage, actually adopt the practice of polygamy anyway, so we’re not that far away from the Latino/Spanish/Mexican population being indoctrinated into polygamy Republicans. That ought to freak Glenn Beck right out of his mind. The Republicans lose AGAIN because they just can’t embrace their own conservative nature!

Can’t you just see Hillary Clinton’s 2016 calculator right now smoking?

Do you see any trouble with the 4:525 odds yet? Hell, I’m dirt bag poor and can’t afford one wife but I wouldn’t be a bit ashamed to let those four men who aren’t giving their fair share yet according to Obama, step up to the polygamy plate. I don’t think Congress should be ashamed of it either.

Lets’ see, the children undoubtedly also are given the greatest education money can buy and go on to contribute handsomely to the Government tax programs. Anyone come out of that on welfare? Yet the Government of the United States continually refuses the most natural human resource available under religious practices as an actual solvency solution.
Indeed, the Government is NOT allowing the rich to contribute in Obama’s words “Their fair share” and no wonder; the Governments got their dicks tied behind their back and has made pussy’s out the men. Let’s not forget the “individual” independence that feminist consider a paramount staple as polygamy demands women indeed probably are forced into careers they want and cherish while others get to stay at home. Oh God, is this TERRIBLE or what?

Imagine, women being able to spend their own paychecks, children living in castles, welfare lines minimized, social security solvent, and the streets paved in gold all over unleashing the creative powers of man -all rolled up in the gospel of Abraham?

Seriously, the problem is the Government has taken away the positive incentive for men to have children, who are actually theirs, rather than the Government taking the taxes and distributing them to children who are not theirs through the welfare and food stamp lines.

The Government no doubt loves the position of father- familiar, but the truth is, it does a really bad job of father, because, well, those on welfare are not their children either.

I’m quite certain that though the responsibilities of being a father are not always easy, that men can teach their children to fish much better than the government can hand out fish. Our confidence and trust in men ought to reflect the same in a social policy of getting the Government’s hand out of marriage, and out of Christian religious practices of procreation. I’ve advocated for years the Government’s hand should get out of the marriage practice and move to the neutral partnership advocacy in the tax code. Glenn Becks’ just caught on to the idea. In fact I wonder if he’s read my family and social network initiative platform or my 3 point Platform?

In short, It’s pretty sound wisdom to keep the Government out of your bed and out of your intimate relationships which is getting harder and harder to do without unplugging every appliance you have and taking the phone battery out of your iphone.

For Pete's sake, you can’t even have sex in your car anymore without the Government spying on you from a satellite. It’s quite a concept to understand God see’s everything anyway, quite another to realize the Government’s there too.

Hey Hollywood, the day is shortly coming when all that bragging you do on your social network of getting drunk and driving home, sexting, or talking on the phone while driving, or how about that affair your having anyway instead of practicing polygamy, turns into evidence to, at the very least prosecute you on criminal behavior, and at the very worst become the government’s best black mailing agent used to make you a real whore?

See any reason to take a stand for the Constitution yet and your privacy? How about not incarcerating the entire population of America while those prosecuting exempt themselves as Obama has on the natural born citizen clause demanded for the Office of the President in the Constitution?

Yeah, you know how that “Transparency” goes don’t you?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ITCr420K4i8


Cody Robert Judy
Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: code4pres CODY JUDY

Help invigorate Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for 2016 here.