Wednesday, July 15, 2015

The First Trip of Trump might be Floating Cruz as Eligible V.P.?

The First Trip of Trump might be Floating Cruz as Eligible V.P?

Everyone, including Trump now, seems to think the 'Birther/Eligibility' Question is off the table. When asked by a reporter directly Trump referred to it an 'old subject' after NBC's Katy Turr asked why people should believe his numbers on illegal immigration when he 'led' the birther movement and sent investigators out to Hawaii to investigate whether Obama was was born there, [Read more at ]
 but we are reminded everyday it is a very important part of the Constitution of the United States and often the Main Stream Media highlights it reminding us they understand it quite well.

TRUMP TO NBC : Alot of People don't believe the Birth Certificate is Real

Ted Cruz and Donald Trump meet Wednesday in New York

On the heels of that interview, it is reported this morning in the Washington Post U.S. Senator Ted Cruz and Mr. Trump also a Presidential Candidate contender may be making an informal compromise on the Constitution's demand for a natural born Citizen based  on Cruz's defense for Trumps stand on 'illegal immigration'. Cruz fails the standard of natural born Citizen just as Obama both having 'foreign' fathers. Cruz's father is noted as a Cuban while Obama's is listed as Kenyan.

The only citizenship status definition for naturalization purposes most notably missing in Congress's definition  found in the "Aliens and Nationals Title 8 Act" is 'born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents. This is presumably because it has never been doubted that 'Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents' was indeed a respect for man's recognition of 'nature's definition' being indisputable.

Those apposed to the clear definition have seized on the fact that 'natural born Citizen' was not defined in the Constitution, leaving out the fact that neither was 'Citizen', the standard for U.S. Senators and U.S. Representatives along with 'pirating' also found in the Constitution.  According to the Aliens and Nationals Title 8 §1401 Code there are no less than ten (10) different circumstances of Citizenship considered that the Constitution failed to identify or outline understood in a-h.

 'Being Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents' is the requirement that you will not find in the Title 8 Actions of naturalization , and thus was reserved for the Vice President and President as a requirement. U.S. Senator Ted Cruz's naturalization is described by Congress in(d):

 [a person born outside of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is a citizen of the United States who has been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year prior to the birth of such person, and the other of whom is a national, but not a citizen of the United States;] , [i]f of course Cruz's mother did not also become a Canadian Citizen at the same time as her husband did immigrating from Cuba. 

If Cruz's mother and father were registered current Canadian Citizens at the time of  Cruz birth in Canada his 'American Citizenship' is as questionable in documentation as Arnold Schwarzenegger  born to foreign parents in Austria. The interesting claim Sen. Cruz makes is that regardless of his mother's devotion to her husbands' citizenship in Canada, and whether she acclimated to Canada as he did with his citizenship from Cuba, is that regardless of that perhaps being a fact she was "born" in the U.S. and maintained the native citizenship regardless of any foreign paperwork regarding official status. This claim would not bode well for Sen. John McCain who was born in the foreign country of Panama  as I maintained in my action barring him from the Office of the President due to an unfaltering statement of nature that Panama would always be where it began for him instead of the United States. He will always be a Panama son, and certainly one of their more famous.

Reference and Respect for both of one's parents and place has been forgotten to cheat in the race for President of the United States. At this point in the race, Mr. Trump ought to be suing Mr. Cruz in Federal Court for being in the race illegally and collecting campaign contributions for an Office he is not qualified for.

While the Main Stream Media will not let Mr. Trump forget he led the Birther Movement, although not a single case in Court bears Mr. Trumps name and it has been myself who has born the Standard on a bi-partisan level, the highlights of Mr. Cruz's 'citizenship status' in the Washington Post relays the message that Mr. Trump is not true to that standard that he placed upon Mr. Obama in objecting to his eligibility in Office.

Of course the Trump's Campaign is new, but the fact he complained about Obama's Qualification is seasoned back to 2012. It is therefore a poor excuse for him to not public excoriate Mr. Cruz for his ineligibility. The failure to do so, certainly does not bode well for him in conservative circles or the Main Stream Media's 'standard policy' of asking politicians about the double standard.

The question remains how long will the Main Stream Media allow Mr. Trump's money to affect the political tides before putting the ax to the tree and watching Mr. Trump fall from number one in the Polls to out of the running completely. Doesn't it seem odd to you to see the Democratic Party *welcome Mr. Trump into the Republican Presidential Race with a hearty recommendations, and yet still see that it's Mr. Bush that Mrs. Clinton's **campaign is worried about with the Main Stream Media lauded by Podesta Hillary's Campaign Chairman,  as in the palm of her hand?

What a cozy relationship for them.  Can you think of a greater accolade the Main Stream Media craves as being a puppet for Hillary?


While it may be a very controversial subject, I feel it is very important subject to bring up and one that is also much more difficult than bringing up the qualifications for the Office of the President, if you can imagine one in our current circumstances. There are many 'religious prophesies, predictions, revelations' floating about in the political arena of the United States. Of course religious sentiment is protected free speech and should be.

The subject of such I wish to contend are those advocating that there will be no 2016 Election. That war, famine, and natural catastrophic events will engulf the United States due to subjects separating  the Republican and Democratic Parties such as 'pro-life or pro-choice', same-sex or equal citizenship marriage protections stances among all. I have to say to you these claims are false and those feeling their strategy of standing on one side or the other on these issues merits some 'protection' from what they feel are God's Judgments that are coming are indeed fooled by the spirits.

It would no more seem rational for the good Lord to bring such disasters upon us now for such then it would have 20 or even 40 years ago as the issues were contended back then. What is undeniably has far as change is concerned is 'both' the Republicans and Democrats near universal support of the very simple line drawn on 'natural born Citizen' as 'born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents as the subject nearly all know about but truly only a handful have actually supported as an imperative of our national security.

As the spirit directs me strongly, to the language of our first President George Washington's statement 1792 concerning this:
" I am sure there never was a people, who had more reason to acknowledge a divine interposition in their affairs, than those of the United States; and I should be pained to believe, that they have forgotten that agency, which was so often manifested during our revolution, or that they failed to consider the omnipotence of that God, who is alone able to protect them." (The Writings of George Washington, by John C. Fitzpatrick, GPO, 1931-44. Vol. 32:2.)

Consider for yourselves every person who has contributed to the only Presidential Campaign offering support in the defense of our national security, regardless of Republican or Democratic Parties, for there is only one Campaign over the last 6 years in the Nation who stands supreme upon the principle of the defense spoken of very clearly here.

It is a very foolish spirit that directs as unsound the seriousness of the national security problem we now face or the whimsical loftiness the much greater unity of both the republican, democratic, as well as independent political affiliations together have nearly bonded against and tendered this simple phrase almost in a non-nonsensical manner.

It therefore comes upon me to assure its importance above any and all other considerations. As the nucleus of our Constitution, there is little doubt among scholars of its vital importance. Posed as the foundation of our freedom's our Constitution is the umbrella of countless rights and privileges, and at the heart the President's powers and the principle candidly sacrificed.

Will not be God's punishment, but the umbrella you have refused, in the storm that gets you. President Washington's words are as true today as they were when penned. Tis only God that alone can protect you and upon that we have survived thus far under the Constitution as the Title of Liberty and Standard of Freedom.

When the heart of it is sacrificed by the greatest majority unanimously, a supercilious manner accredited upon myself as seriously defending it in a historic bi-partisan manner, by that you shall know why the Judgments you have spoken of shall fall justly upon you and not by any other stand you have made in a pretended righteousness that shall exempt you. To those very few who have contributed, with monetary support or even passing it in social media, you have more of promise from God than any act understood to lay claim upon such as Pres. Washington refers,  because it is the greatest act in defense for freedom and liberty upon the most.

That means you deserve the promises. May God Bless You and for those who wish to join us that choice is still available to you.  You may support this effort and or pass it on. Here.


* Democratic Party Response to Trump here and here.
1- "Everything is awesome," - Democratic National Committee Press Secretary Holly Shulman
2-“Today, Donald Trump became the second major Republican candidate to announce for president in two days. He adds some much-needed seriousness that has previously been lacking from the GOP field, and we look forward [to] hearing more about his ideas for the nation.”

**Why Hillary is worrying about Jeb Bush
John Podesta, Chairman of the 2016 Hillary Clinton Campaign, has already decided that Governor Jeb Bush will be the Republican nominee for President.
[“psychosis of the media . . .which is something we created.” He added with a humble chuckle ]
Podesta quipped at one point, “Let’s face it– our strategy always seems to work.” Then he told the person he was chatting with that “they [Hillary’s campaign team] had spent all weekend talking about strategy.”]
[ limit his media interviews like Hillary’s been doing. If he must do an interview here or there, Jeb should consent only to request from conservative press –just as Hillary did when she cherry-picked CNN to do her first “unserious” interview. Fewer interviews means less ammunition for the liberal media to use to harpoon Jeb, should he become the 2016 GOP nominee. Let’s face: the verbal bullets are going to fly from Republicans at one another starting August when the first GOP debate is scheduled.]

You get to decide that. I'd say don't trust bad legal advice and contribute what you can TODAY FOR A BETTER AMERICA TOMORROW

Cody Robert Judy- Presidential Candidate '08-'12-'16

Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.

1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.

INSPIRING - I believe in You

No comments:

Post a Comment