Author - Cody Robert Judy
Conservative Independent American
Candidate for Pres 16, 12, 08
U.S. Senate 18, 10, 04, 00
U.S. Rep. 02
Book: Taking A Stand - The conservative independent Voice
Arizona is on the front line in defending America’s Borders, and the Feds not only refuse their job but are doing just about everything they can to assure the dis-comfort of the Union and undermine States Rights, especially in light of the Feds failing.
Reports from the Arizona Daily Star list a few of the parts of the law that have been put on hold by the Federal Judge:
[The overall law will still take effect Thursday, but without the provisions that angered opponents. Sections barred from being enforced include: • Requiring a police officer to make a reasonable attempt to check the immigration status of those they have stopped;
• Forbidding police from releasing anyone they have arrested until that person's immigration status is determined;
• Making it a violation of Arizona law for anyone not a citizen to fail to carry documentation;
• Creating a new state crime for trying to secure work while not a legal resident;
• Allowing police to make warrantless arrests if there is a belief the person has committed an offense that allows them to be removed from the United States. "Requiring Arizona law enforcement officials and agencies to determine the immigration status of every person who is arrested burdens lawfully-present aliens because their liberty will be restricted while their status is checked," U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton ruled.
The judgment is "virtually a complete win for the United States" and that the "heart of SB1070 has been enjoined," University of Arizona law professor Gabriel "Jack" Chin said.]
Very interesting, the University of Arizona law Professor Gabriel “Jack’ Chin would weigh in on this. You may recall another issue the Arizona black belt Professor Gabriel “Jack” Chin weighed in on for it was used in the law suit by me, Cody Judy, in my Article II Patriot Stand against John McCain here:
Excerpt from Judy v. McCain Federal Law Case Civil No. 2:08-cv-01162:
Why Senator John McCain Cannot Be President: Eleven Months and a Hundred Yards Short of Citizenship
Gabriel J. Chin University of Arizona - James E. Rogers College of Law; University of Arizona - School of Public Administration and Policy
July 9, 2008
Arizona Legal Studies Discussion Paper No. 08-14
Abstract: Senator McCain was born in 1936 in the Canal Zone to U.S. citizen parents. The Canal Zone was territory controlled by the United States, but it was not incorporated into the Union. As requested by Senator McCain's campaign, distinguished constitutional lawyers Laurence Tribe and Theodore Olson examined the law and issued a detailed opinion offering two reasons that Senator McCain was a natural born citizen. Neither is sound under current law. The Tribe-Olson Opinion suggests that the Canal Zone, then under exclusive U.S. jurisdiction, may have been covered by the Fourteenth Amendment's grant of citizenship to "all persons born . . . in the United States." However, in the Insular Cases, the Supreme Court held that "unincorporated territories" were not part of the United States for constitutional purposes. Accordingly, many decisions hold that persons born in unincorporated territories are not Fourteenth Amendment citizens. The Tribe-Olson Opinion also suggests that Senator McCain obtained citizenship by statute. However, the only statute in effect in 1936 did not cover the Canal Zone. Recognizing the gap, in 1937, Congress passed a citizenship law applicable only to the Canal Zone, granting Senator McCain citizenship, but eleven months too late for him to be a citizen at birth. Because Senator John McCain was not a citizen at birth, he is not a "natural born Citizen" and thus is not "eligible to the Office of President" under the Constitution.
Keywords: John McCain, Canal Zone, citizenship, naturalization, natural born citizen, president, presidential eligibility JEL Classifications: K33 Working Paper Series
It’s good to see the professor again! As John McCain is fighting for his political future, he has run amuck the Constitution of the United States. He actually had a ‘good ole boys’ U.S. Senate Resolution 511 created on his behalf, never mind that the rest of the Natural Born Citizens in America were smart enough to figure that one out without a U.S. Senate Resolution that is NOT binding, NOT signed by the President, NOT seen by the House, which to be affective as Constitutional it would need to be.
This McDastardly deed also had the effect as a ‘gag order’ on all the Republican Senators from opposing Obama’s Eligibility, based on the fact they had signed off on Sen. John McCain’s ill gotten gain.
Very sad when America has lost the trust of the two party systems to greed, power, and deception, over service, honor, and trust. This is the biggest motivation for me to make the following 2 videos in the hope that Arizona will wake up and vote McCain out of there for not being true to his oath.
Wow it’s the 4th of July all over again for Utah on the 24th of July! We get spoiled with rodeo, parades, barbeque, and of course fireworks. On July 24th 1847 the first pioneer wagons blazed into the Salt Lake Valley. We are very proud of our entry into the Union as an Independent State within the union of the United States of America but it took a long time!
July 24th isn’t the Utah’s entry into Statehood, which was Jan 4th 1846 as the 45th State into the Union, but many artificially recognize it as a celebration of peculiar nature for the State origin, so it’s easy to mix up. The 24th of July is officially known as Pioneer Day. Of course images of the pioneers coming into the Salt Lake Valley stir up memories of exactly why they had come, and that clearly was to escape religious persecution. Utah’s Constitution is an Ace ahead of the United States Constitution when it comes to religious persecution, which I’m very considerate, respectful, and thankful for.
The unique particular of Utah becoming a State into the Union- During the 1870s and 1880s, laws were passed and federal marshals assigned to punish and harass polygamists, confiscate church property, jail polygamists and deny jury trials or voting rights to all polygamists. In the 1890 Manifesto, the LDS Church finally agreed to ban polygamy.
When Utah applied for statehood again in 1895, it was accepted. One of the conditions for granting Utah statehood was that a ban on polygamy be written into the state constitution. This was a condition required of other western states that were admitted into the Union later. Statehood was officially granted on January 4, 1896, over 30 years after the 60,000 population requirement for statehood had been met.
This of course today is seen as a travesty in the face of U.S.C. Amendment I. which states “that Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;” The Christian Bible clearly did not abdicate polygamy, nor did it sustain same sex marriage as many of the States in modern time have passed. The unintended consequences of de-population have contributed to a host of problems that we are seeing now, which ironically, polygamy may have helped making it a ‘law of nature’ that has consequences in not being followed by mankind.
The biggest irony of this clearly,( ¾ of the world actually practices polygamy, and here may be a reason) is the desperate attempt now for the Federal Government to fund entitlement programs without an up and coming generation of Americans. People wonder why Washington has the audacity and hope to consider mass population with amnesty programs? Clearly it is an attempt to come up with contributions towards Social Security, Medicare, and any other underfunded Government Program that may need some funds because younger people just are not having as many children for which these programs for the elderly were to be shouldered and actually depend upon. We are all familiar with the number of persons going down supporting Social Security for example: use to be 10 to 1, went down to 6 to 1, now we’re at 3 to 1 and the Government that made laws, is discovering very quickly the way they have bit off their tail to spite their own head. It is interesting debate for sure, but clearly the Laws of Nature will not be governed by The Feds.
One only need to study a ‘Law of Nature’ in a little more detail to find that Gods Laws are for our good, and we often find out sooner or later that we weren’t too smart in comparing polygamy to slavery.
Anyway, what did we expect, some grand reward for stiffing God in the face? It’s another quadric to see the majority of pro-lifers vehemently opposed to polygamy, as if God is not counting the one’s they are prohibiting from coming down in their idea of his grace denying some soul that ability. It’s a truly confused world I tell ya, and I don’t have all the answers, just here like you trying to figure some things out.
Utah celebrates Pioneer Day July 24th as a celebration of the first wagon trains entering Utah. The struggle for water and to plant gardens were immediate first task upon entering the valley, and that tradition continues all over Utah, as a industrious people, it’s almost hard to go into any neighborhood and not see someone out in some garden, of course I have mine also and prepared a little video for the Celebration of out Utah Pioneer Day.
Never before offered relief – A buyers remorse on your Presidential Vote of 2008 for Obama and McCain is now available. First of all you just write your U.S. Representatives and tell them the 2008 election candidates you voted for never told you they weren't 'natural born citizens'. This has never happened before! Now you have grounds to get your vote back!
You need to tell them it is their job to see to it that your vote is protected from fraud, and just because Obama needed John McCain to be quite on his eligibility, [John McCain knew himself he was not a natural born citizen, or why would he have tried asked for a U.S. Senate Resolution for his Senator Buddies, Hillary Clinton, and Barack Obama along with all his other R- U.S. Senators in U.S. Sen. Res 511 ] was no reason for Republicans to abandon the Constitution.
Many people got buffalo chipped when that U.S. Sen. Res. 511 was passed in thinking that made Sen. John McCain legitimate. Of Course Sen. John McCain was not foreign to the problems of his being born in Panama. The Senator from AZ. knew firsthand the rejection of an Amendment to the Constitution to allow non natural born citizens to run for President in the year 2000. YES! This wasn't attempted in the early 1800's, but it was very recent.
The subcommittee heard arguments, received testimony and rejected the proposal on guess what basis... SAFETY! That's right, they rejected it on the same grounds our forefathers introduced it into the Constitution.
Now, the U.S. Sen Resolution 511 that announces Sen. John McCain is not anywhere close to a Constitutional Amendment, which requires 3/4 of the Legislatures to vote on it and requires a signature from the President. Sen. John McCain only had it passed with the Senate. The House of Representatives never heard it or voted on it, and he certainly didn't have a President sign it.
So the sum total of what Sen. John McCain did was try as best as he could to subvert the Constitution and use the power he had gained in the Senate to strong arm everyone into voting for it. There needs to be an investigation into ALL the Republican Senators testimonies as to the conditions they voted on U.S. Sen. Resolution 511.
What exactly did Sen. John McCain tell them?
Now if safety was the issue in not passing a Constitutional Amendment, what position exactly does that put Sen. John McCain and Sen. Barack Obama in subverting the Constitution?
I'm sorry to say that it puts them in a treacherous position towards the United States. A treacherous position towards every voter whose vote they wanted to cultivate with un-constitutional poison.
When you think about the enemies of the United States wanting to tear, and stomp, and dis-honor America, of course at the heart of that is our Constitution. Now, we see firsthand how Sen. John McCain has not honored the Constitution and how he has actually spit on it, and dis-honored every drop of blood that has been spilt for it.
When you consider God's infinite wisdom in placing anyone in his particular birth spot with the knowledge of everything, I'm sure McCain/Feingold, McCain/Kennedy, and McCain/Lieberman was pretty straight forward as to saying this guy is a progressive socialist in sheep’s clothing of a Republican. Barack Obama is also not a natural born citizen with a British Father, and as you can see with his policies is a socialist and left as you can get.
There is a special place for traitors of the United States and that is the place McCain and Obama should be sent simply because every single vote cast for them was done so in a dis-honor for the Constitution and without a punishment who may see that their endeavor was successful and say to themselves, "no one will do anything to us and we shall be all the more well for the wear."
Their names need to be stripped from every record, or honorable mention in the United States, and their positions and seats removed for the dirt that they have treated every single United States Citizen in asking for their vote and biting the hand that voted for them with such a venomous strike.
While it might be hard to argue with the facts that 8 million jobs that were lost in the recession were lost to men, and as quoted in the article: “postindustrial economy is indifferent to men’s size and strength- The attributes that are most valuable today—social intelligence, open communication, the ability to sit still and focus—are, at a minimum, not predominantly male”, the way I feel seems to add fuel to the fire.
In our 21st Century modern world were women have not only surpassed men in many fields and areas in competence in the work place, education, and by God in still being able to raise the kids, a women has shown men just how marvelous she is. In a sad way I’ve experienced myself this crazy insane competition that my own wives, at different times, have had with me.
My second wife even made the comment that she was somewhat upset with herself that I had bought the house and provided it for her 4 kids for the time we were together. I was flabbergasted by the inner competitive race being run, that I had no idea I was in. For my own part, I look at a women’s role as something I could never ever fill, so why or even how could I compete?
That’s insane! As to her intelligence and ability to figure and accomplish a task, I certainly don’t hold anything back as to credit to women. I often feel without being told, that I have worn out my usefulness. If I’m resented for what I can do, that she can’t, in any given circumstance, for whatever reason; bad credit, kids to feed, or anything really that can affect a man just as well, AND I’m ridiculed for what I can’t do or fail at, being hit with a recession or joblessness; there is no room for a good job well done.
It’s a catch 22 that really leaves you feeling blue. Well, I suppose we all like feeling needed. And when either of the sexes perpetrates the lack of needing each other upon the opposite, they are really in a state of pride just ready to fall off the pedestal.
Hopefully, for whatever reason one of the sexes in a marriage has fallen short, the other one is ready and willing to pick up the slack. As a team of horses is pulling a wagon, the most is truly accomplished when they are pulling in tandem, working together as one in the best ways they can. The burdens are lighter, and a labor of love is enjoyed.
In the age of these post modern wonder women, if she is to be congratulated, she also must bear the fruits of her labors. What in our world are we dismal in? Well, the prisons are full near capacity, the debts about 14 Trillion, and the kids are born into slavery just coming into the world oweing $40,000 before they take their first breath here in the United States. Something is very wrong! Could any of that be contributed to the new women in our world being so competitive in the work field that her children received a man’s wages instead of her invaluable nurturing? Could any of that be not waiting to pay cash but the influence of pleasing a women and buying alot more then what you have cash for? But now.. its' all going to be different?
Where is Mom? Oh she’s working and will be home tired and washed up around 7pm. Well, post modern world has a solution for that too- Don’t have children! Then you can do it without the guilt!
The resultant plan of attack literally attacks the society at the heart. Eating away at the blood supply of the population reduction we find fewer people supporting Social Security and the elderly entitlement plans that are vital. We see a deflation in the population, and a loss of revenue in the tax bucket, which drives politicians crazy trying to figure out how to get more people into the tax system with say immigration amnesty, and still trying to tell them it’s greater to give to your new country then to take: a desperate attempt to lower the standard in order to increase the tax revenue.
While women may compete with men, when the competition drives her away from the home in large degrees and in comparison to a man, the competition is always going to hurt society in the long run, because there is just no replacement for women in the family unit. A man can do what he can and many of us do in watching the kids and trying to fill in a gap and families all over the United States dealing with what they have to deal with.
Hopefully, they are valuing each other enough to realize that either one down in the dumps or dealt a rough hand is no reason to quit the team. Financial hard ships are the easiest reason to start dumping on one another. The best piece of advice I can think of to give anyone taking the time to read this is to remember to act in love, because it poses the least regret. People are people and in a truth the saying that “God don’t make no junk” is as true today as it ever was. A beat up car may take a new part here or there, but it’s no reason to trash the whole car.
That’s just a little comparison to not giving up on each other and realizing that situations never stay the same. Change happens every day, and just as sure as a women says a guy is her ‘ball and chain” the World War III breaks out, millions of men die and she realizes her world has been so flipped that for some reason he was needed and now he is dead and she is alone.
Then her prayer is not for a equal pay, not for equal status, she could give a damn about the race now she has won. God has just shown her that when reaping what you sew, he indeed created his sons. Sometimes winning wasn’t the best idea against a man. That being unique and strange and opposite of her was much nicer then having a bunch of her make-up stole, and her clothes worn of which she, in most cases anyway, never had to worry about him taking or wearing.
Speaking for and not against the laws of nature that everyone of us are stuck with facing regardless of any most modern scholastic horse shit, thank God for a man’s production ability! While her limitations are set at 1 pregnancy a year, there is no match for a man’s ability to create literally millions in one shot! There is no competing with that, and there’s not even a reason to argue against the laws of nature. They just are, and if that makes you mad it’s a pretty good reason to say come on guys, let’s go to the game, while she deals with her own mother nature.
You know, if there was any competition I'd just like to make an official declarations "Women Have Won!". Knowing women as I do, I'm almost postive that is not going to do the trick, they won't feel better knowing they have won. We're going to have to change a few things now starting with the coined addage that have been a womens pretty cozy compliment, "Behind every man is a better women". Now, they have won, we will have to say, "Behind every women, is a better man".
I don't like that though.. I like the idea of honoring a women, but in truth it's simply because she is women and in all I do, I could never ever ever ever do what she is so capable of doing.
[when news broke of General Stanley McChrystal in essence saying the exact same thing to Rolling Stone magazine. This isn't just a story to be brushed off. This is a bombshell.
Don't be distracted by the media comically chastising the General for daring to speak out against "The One" (yes, the same media that hailed military officers who were willing to "speak truth to power" in criticizing George Bush). That isn't the story.
The true meaning of the McChrystal episode is titanic, because it is quite apparent the General was sending a stern message directly to the American people.
For more reasons than I can count, it is beyond obvious that McChrystal's public criticism of Obama was not a lapse in judgment or a mistake. It was unquestionably intentional. First, four-star generals have not achieved that rank without knowing the chain of command and the expectation of subordination to superiors. Second, all of McChrystal's advisers were touting the same message, demonstrating this was no fluke, nor an offhand comment taken out of context. Third, McChrystal spoke the inflammatory words to Rolling Stone, a well known anti-war, anti-military magazine. Fourth, reports are that McChrystal actually saw the piece before it went to print and offered up no objections to its content.
If all that is true, then it naturally begs the question: Why did he do it?
McChrystal is one of the lead authors of the "counterinsurgency" strategy that, despite the nay saying of liberals like then-Senators Obama and Biden, transformed Iraq from a quagmire into a success. He knows the strategy works. But as its architect, he also knows this new military policy requires two vital elements: lots of troops, and as much time as necessary for them to do their job.
Bush committed to stay in Iraq until the job was finished. The result speaks for itself.
First, Obama – having championed himself as the anti-war candidate – cut the number of troops McChrystal requested. And then, in what has to be one of the most foolish wartime moves in history, he announced an arbitrary date for the beginning of American troop withdrawal.
This may please the ex-hippies in the anti-war crowd that Obama courted during the 2008 campaign, but it has [Afghanistan].
Having pressed his case privately with Obama's war team in Washington , McChrystal certainly saw the handwriting on the wall, and as a final recourse, pled his case to the American people.
Were his actions a breach of protocol? Yes. Did they rise to the level of insubordination? Probably. Was Obama justified in removing him from command? I think so. But after we're done hammering McChrystal for going over the President's head, we better give some serious thought as to why he was so willing to put his career on the line like that.
The reason is as clear as it is frightening: our political leadership in Washington is clueless. And their incompetence is costing us not only resources and money, but most importantly the precious lives of brave American soldiers.
General Stanley McChrystal was willing to lose his job to send that message to the only people who can do something about it. He was talking to you.]
The interesting commentary is also that from private to general our troops are still U.S. Citizens, and with that have 1st Amendment rights. Obama's firing McCrystal for what he said and certainly not what he did as far as not following direct orders is a 'RED FLAG' as to what Obama thinks of our first Amendment turned against him.
The marks of good leaders are certainly ascribed to not only the rights they enjoyed while getting to their positions, but what they ascribe to while in the seats of powers to those who may oppose them Constitutionally speaking of course. Therein lies’ the quagmire of America at this time: We have a usurping president who at the very least lied about his qualifications for office in the Declaration of Candidacy, understood very clearly in our Constitution, and the office of the President is charged to protect our Constitution.
The problem follows; he wouldn't have the same respect for our Constitution once he got there. What did people voting for him expect?
Houston we may have a problem..roughly 10 million people may be in serious trouble.
As Obama says it, “Let's be clear on what we need to be clear on”... if you live in the coastal areas near that oil gusher you'd be wise to get a U-Haul and move like the U.S. Navy has done.
There are official warnings, and unofficial warnings.., there move to Costa Rica is an unofficial we're getting the hell out of here, so why wouldn't that be a good consideration for you?
"Under the guise of the “war on drugs” the U.S. Military is evacuating its ships and hardware from the Gulf of Mexico to safety off the sheltered coast of Costa Rica. The “war on drugs” cover story is laughable being that we can’t even get that level of engagement on our border with Mexico where all the drugs come through."
"The Navy is obviously worried about either poison from the methane/corexit 9500 mix or a massive methane explosion/tsunami. A tsunami fits with the NOAA blackout of the U.S. tsunami warning system. It also explains why BP is not actively cleaning up the oil on the beaches. Why clean them up if they are going to be gone."
What's good for the Goose ought to be good for the Gander, I'd think at a minimum that people who were living on the coast in range of a potential tsunami ought to think about storage units some 75 miles inland or better.
You know that just makes a sense to give such a warning that gives people a chance to get their things out. The pressure that occurs down 5,000 feet is beyond what we have a lot of experience in and if by some chance that sea floor caves in, or by some drilling or other man-made trigger, gives rise to an underwater eruption triggering a tsunami people would have no time to pack anything and get out, there would be an enormous death toll, rather than a exodus or is that what this administration wants?
One has to wonder about the idea of population extermination being considered in the fractions of the head of one usurping president who doesn’t give a rat’s ass about the Constitution, and by that he doesn’t give one big rat’s ass about the population.
So let’s be clear about what we can be clear on,.. if we value our Navy and move it to safety, but we don’t give at least a general evacuation consideration for the population, are we saying we care for our navy more then the people of the coast that the navy is charged to protect and serve? I think that’s the message that is being sent.
I disagree. I believe I care more for the population who is innocently putting their trust and money in maintaining a navy, and putting their trust in our government to care for them. This just reeks of stink and I don’t like it! Look at the map…and the safety of Costa Rica in the Tsunami path to the gulf
If the Navy is moving… YOU MOVE! Let's be clear about what we can be clear about. Obama has lied on his declaration of candidacy stating he was a 'natural born citizen' which he wasn't and he knew it being a 'constitutional lawyer'. He lied to the whole American Population without blinking an eye. We are clear very clear that he is a forked tongue usurper which is equivalent to being American's worst nightmare and he is your number 1 most broadcast air manipulator. When your clear on that you start packing when Obama moves but doesn't tell you to move.
Race,Color, and Prior Servitude U.S.C Amendment XV Parable of the Unfaithful Wife
The mysteries of the Lord are sought out by churches and the people that attend them in literally every nation of the world. God is always revealing hidden truths, yet is at the same time the same yesterday, today, and forever. The bible is full of parables and dreams and visions as applicable today as they were the day they were given, yet the Lord still teaches in parables in everyone’s own day that they too can understand and have the experience of finding the hidden truths. Parables give us the experience of finding ourselves… treasures that are of great worth. The Lord says when you come to a child to speak in the language of the child, and so it is I would like to rehearse a modern day parable.
There was a certain women who had become disdained of her husband. She was no longer enchanted by his money, charm, or good looks. She no longer found him attractive and looked to find fault in him daily. She was a goodly women adorned with nice clothes, a clean women who kept herself moderately. She had come from a divorce and had a nice house and children who were nearly raised and it seemed she was coming to the same conclusion of this new husband as she had about the first husband.
Let’s just put a name on this second husband, so we can all simply refer to him with a name. Let’s call him… Abraham. That is a name that comes from the Bible and is pretty respected by every Christian Church. Now the Lord had told this Abraham, just the same as he had told Abraham of old that he would be a man of whom a great nation came, and also that his family would be one even as Abraham’s of old. Abraham was a faithful man and had been very true to the Lord and had sought diligently to remain in that favor for the Lord had indeed graced him abundantly with many heavenly gifts which were a delight to him, thus he sought to please the Lord and to remain a faithful servant of his Lords’. In this Abraham’s first marriage finances had come to bare down on his young family and his wife had lost faith in him encouraged by her family who wished her back in their own lands and so she went. It pleased the Lord to bruise Abraham that he might learn wisdom and understanding and become even a man of his own heart.
Now, as I said Abraham had sought the Lord diligently to gain some understanding of why his first wife and family had been taken from him and the Lord taught him many things of which he had failed and thus Abraham learned what he was doing that was wrong as a father and husband according to the Lord’s intelligence that was somewhat different then the ‘norms’ of the society he was from. Thus Abraham was encouraged finding some meaning to his heart break in the loss of his family. So this Abraham in my parable was encouraged, and again went out to get him a wife. This time, faithfully, he understood more of the Lord’s intelligence, and he knew that he could no longer rely on the ‘social norms’ which he had grown up with finding only heartache and loss in those customs. Our Abraham in this parable did meet a woman who he felt was a good woman and he sought diligently to court her and in every way to impress her as a suitor, and she was impressed. They became what we’d call in our modern day world ‘serious’ in their relationship.
They had wanted a child together and had sought to achieve that, though they had both had children in their earlier marriages who were near grown and out of the house but nothing happened for two years. Abraham was told in a dream that if his wife would do this and that she would become pregnant, but the this and that involved the trial of their love which the Lord had taught Abraham of which he had conveyed to wife before being married, but had never done.
Of course Abraham knew that it was not enough to worship the Lord in lip service saying, “yes yes Lord” on one hand, perhaps even on a Sunday, and then running out and saying ‘no no Lord” on the other hand, perhaps, even the six other days of the week.
So it was with great trembling again, Abraham related this to his wife who was to Abraham’s sadness not so willing to accommodate what the Lord had related. Nevertheless, Abraham was gentle with her knowing the Lord in his love had been gentle with him at times, and as their talks went on finally they were accomplished in the test the Lord had presented though it wasn’t without a few dents and bruises. This of course was familiar to Abraham, being bruised by the Lord before, but had not really been known to her so it was difficult.
She ordered a separation and thus it had been nearly 3 months since she had seen Abraham, when on occasion she accepted an invitation to go on a trip with him. Abraham grieved in his missing her and doting on his love for her, again sought to court and spoil her in any way he could manage. Though he wasn’t rich he had managed a plane ride, a wonderful dinner, and a room at a luxurious hotel. There she was receptive to him and their love was renewed. Although Abraham was delighted about their love, he sensed something was different about her but he couldn’t figure it out.
Over an ice-cream cone as the trip was nearing an end the next day, she pulled out of her purse and ultrasound picture and related she was 3 months pregnant. Yes, the Lord had indeed blessed them as they were faithful in their own, shall we call it a "test of Abraham".
Time went on and the baby was born which was a delight to both of them, but the baby had not healed her feelings all the way through and though she had seen the blessings, she sought about daily to prove her husband wrong in all of the things he loved. It was as if some competition had invigorated her and through this daily barrage of insults she did not relate to him so directly as she did her friends and her family, gradually another separation occurred.
This was a great sadness to him for he had felt for sure that the blessing and fulfilling of the Lord’s words would also seal her testimony, but it did not. Her heart was different and she was set hard and no amount of courting or attempts by him to restore his marriage worked. The child grew and was a beautiful child whom they both delighted in greatly, he had taken his first steps and they were still separated.
Abraham was weighed down in his grief, for he had sought diligently to please the Lord, but again it pleased the Lord to bruise him. She had taken off her wedding ring which had embarrassed Abraham and she was flippant in her ability without him feeling she had no need for him. She was satisfied and had no desire for him. Abraham weighed down in his grief returned his wedding ring to her jewelry box next to the one he had given her that she no longer felt any value for. He told her perhaps they should put the rings in a trust account for their baby.
One day as Abraham was weighed down in grief and standing in a line with his head bowed a girl he had known, only as an acquaintance, turned as she was in front of him in the line he was waiting in, and felt for his sorrow. She put her arms around his neck and said “Abraham, don’t be sad!”, and he acknowledged her good will towards him as a friend who simply didn’t want to see a friend sad. It was just a pure coincidence that his wife had seen this exchange and after the girl who had put her arms around Abraham and told him not to be sad left bounding off, as to Abraham probably not to be seen coincidentally again, the wife headed off towards the girl and cornered her.
She asked the girl whom she didn’t know at all, seeing her arms around her husband, “Have you ever made-love to my husband?” The girl responded, “Hundreds of times!”, and bounded off again as if not to blink an eye. She then came to her husband and said, “Haah, caught you cheating!”
Now this is the end of the parable.
There are always questions at the end of every parable to be answered. This is the process of a parable. For every church to ask and for every person to ask themselves if in this parable Abraham was actually Jesus and the women in the parable was the Church to whom is married to Jesus in similiar parables of the Bible; in what manner of cheating have you accused the Lord after his faithfulness to you?
Do you not suppose the Lord to visit other churches at all?
Hasn’t he still favored you with many blessings, yet you accuse him of cheating with others who have not truly known him either?
Why have you entreated your husband to accusations of unfaithfulness when he has so patiently and lovingly taught you faithfully all that is known to inherit his kingdom? Are you so bent on hurting him that you would cast him in to prison if he arrived?
And, what must you do now, or what will you do now you have seen as you are seen, taking your ring off? Will you choose to keep it off and find another Lord and who might that Lord be; your usurping president Obama?
What do the rings represent?
Is Obama's love of unfaithfulness towards the Constitution what you really want in a President?
Do you not desire faithfulness? You must desire faithfulness, or you certainly wouldn’t accuse anyone of being unfaithful?
What an oddity it is for people to crave faithfulness and truthfulness but vote for a lie. It is if they can’t help but inherit exactly what they are… unfaithful and liars themselves, blind yet they see.
