Let's Give Up the Constitution for a Piece of Trash? Hummm?

The following transcript from the video, and the video seen below is the most benign friendly piece of trash. What makes it so vagarious is its framer Professor of Constitutional Law at Georgetown University Louis Michael Seidman seems so dangerous who would pay him any attention?

Mild mannered, even tempered and a constitutional law professor - wasn't Obama also a "senior lecturer," at the University of Chicago Law School who said he "served as a professor" and said he was "regarded as" a professor?

I'd like to take this time to make some scratch marks over his "simple idea" which I've encased in [] and start with the first sentence which jumps right out of the gate on you like the orders from the leader of a flash mob set to trash a retail store in the mall:

[I've got a simple idea: Let's give up on the Constitution.]

Simple ideas are genuinely pure and straight forward, but even if he used the 6 words to shock you, the resulting vacuum of the Republic for which we stand has vanished for what we must assume is not a Republic, in which the majority mob rules and the individual loses. What would the ACLU say to that?

[I know, it sounds radical, but it's really not. Constitutional disobedience is as American as apple pie.]

Well, he has admitted to being radical here but knows its necessary to try and convince you otherwise. Our prisons are full of people who decided to break the law and here he is advocating "Constitutional disobedience" which is basically a disobedience of the Supreme Law of the Land the likes of which every office holder of the court and government have sworn to uphold.

[For example, most of our greatest Presidents -- Jefferson, Lincoln, Wilson, and both Roosevelts -- had doubts about the Constitution, and many of them disobeyed it when it got in their way.]

Perfect examples Presidents? - irregardless of any circumstances that our Constitution actually allows and provides for within the Constitution, which would make it not against the Constitution. He uses past presidents, who in his words in the bottom paragraph we would consider "ancient and outdated" as his examples of giving up on the Constitution? How is it possible to use "ancient and outdated" material to discredit "ancient and outdated material"? Shouldn't he be using modern material if he wants to discredit "ancient and outdated material"? He makes no sense.

[To be clear, I don't think we should give up on everything in the Constitution. The Constitution has many important and inspiring provisions, but we should obey these because they are important and inspiring, not because a bunch of people who are now long-dead favored them two centuries ago.]

Ohhhh so he thinks some things are good in the Constitution now and wants to save the "parts" of it that are "important and inspiring provisions", according to who? Him? I find the "natural born citizen clause for the Office of the President quite inspiring that has for over 200 years prevented a foreign leader from financing his own heirs on to the throne of the White House.

[Unfortunately, the Constitution also contains some provisions that are not so inspiring. For example, one allows a presidential candidate who is rejected by a majority of the American people to assume office. Suppose that Barack Obama really wasn't a natural-born citizen. So what?]

Holy Cow!- This guy is nuts. So the Electorate actually does their job and finds out because of a little investigation that the President Elect is only 11 years old and is the son of North Korea Kim Jong II- a son he had born in Hawaii. Anyone see a problem with that? He obviously doesn't. Or was he talking about the off chance insanity plot of the the Pres and VP actually being assassinated and our Constitution providing a back up in the chain of command who would have the authority vested in them, but who were not elected specifically for that office while we got together and voted again? He doesn't like that part.

[Constitutional obedience has a pernicious impact on our political culture. Take the recent debate about gun control. None of my friends can believe it, but I happen to be skeptical of most forms of gun control.]

Pernicious? Such a coy word - Having a harmful effect, esp. in a gradual or subtle way. What? He just said we should abandon the Constitution and he doesn't think he is being pernicious? Then he has the audacity to chum up to the Constitution's 2nd Amendment? This guys dumb and he's got balls. That's a dangerous combination. The fact his friends don't believe he's a friend to the Constitution makes me wonder if his friends are right. His opening statement did in fact say "Give Up the Constitution" rather then "Give Up parts of the Constitution" in some sensible and reasonable term as the Constitution permits, being flexible and adaptable to modern times by 2/3rds of a majority. Does he have a problem with finding 2/3rd of the Representatives and Senators that we the people, the majority, pick actually agreeing on an Amendment? What - its not fast enough for him or is it the fact that 2/3rd is just too heavy of a burden?

[I understand, though, that's not everyone's view, and I'm eager to talk with people who disagree.]

Yes, he's eager to talk to people who disagree with the 2nd Amendment because they are more his friends then the ones he was referring to can't believe he's a 2nd Amendment champion?

[But what happens when the issue gets Constitutional-ized? Then we turn the question over to lawyers, and lawyers do with it what lawyers do. So instead of talking about whether gun control makes sense in our country, we talk about what people thought of it two centuries ago.]

Now he's comparing taking a stand for the Constitution to constipation in the word "Constitutional-ized" is that even a word in the wiki dictionary? Yes it is and it means: Incorporated into a constitution. How does that happen? Oh yes, 2/3rd of the Congress agree to it. Then he reveals his true colors on gun control advocating the notion that people two centuries ago could not have possibly wanted a gun for the same reason our military does, our own militia's do, and our own hunters do? How could the line of thinking still exist of overthrowing a tyrannical government? Is tyrannical dictator king still a word he understands?

[Worse yet, talking about gun control in terms of constitutional obligation needlessly raises the temperature of political discussion. Instead of a question on policy, about which reasonable people can disagree, it becomes a test of one's commitment to our foundational document and, so, to America itself.]

More on Gun Control out of his 2nd Amendment respecting mouth here; funny I've never heard of anyone at the NRA's rally's getting riled about people giving them weapons. Its always the people wanting to take their water and bee-bee guns away that pisses them off.

[This is our country. We live in it, and we have a right to the kind of country we want. We would not allow the French or the United Nations to rule us, and neither should we allow people who died over two centuries ago and knew nothing of our country as it exists today.]

A little patriotism out of his mouth respecting America's Constitution and its flexibility for our modern age? No, he's mocking it. He also advocates that the French and United Nations should not rule over us and then throws the founder and framers overboard with them. He just doesn't understand our Constitution is flexible and provides a great way for Amendments does he? He also doesn't seem to understand that people who lived two centuries ago thought making-love was a lot better then making war. That's pretty standard I think. The proof? We're here because our Daddys got our Mama's pregnant and managed enough food to feed us. WhaWhoo!

[If we are to take back our own country, we have to start making decisions for ourselves, and stop deferring to an ancient and outdated document.]

Take back our country? From who? It sounds like this guy is advocating for England to take back the States. In which case he is aiding and abetting for something even more ancient and outdated then the Constitution. If this professor from Georgetown University, a school that was on my list to attend when I was 18, is anything like the others I'd say America has no friend there, but old King George might have, and I made the right decision not to attend. Reminds me of a few words of my new song The Promise Man - "your the new American slave, that's what this is all about."

Now if you wanna hear this pompous elitist B.S. in action just hit the play button.
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-3445_162-57566014/professor-take-our-country-back-from-the-constitution/




Cody Robert Judy
YouTube: Cody Judy
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4otwMXGzvac


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-sVTov29ZQ4



Words to The Promise Man

Presenting: The Promise Man - by The Cody Robert Judy Band celebrating SCOTUS Case # 12-5276 Judy v. Obama and demonstrating the reasons for protecting the Constitution that provide the opportunity in America. This includes the natural born citizen clause unique to the Office of the President Obama fails not being born in the U.S. to Citizen parents.
(Words)
The Promise Man
Prelude:
I'm talkn' to all you dreamers -- think America is your opportunity..yea -- you can't hide from me -- I see you out there- loving the opportunity- That America brings -- Yea you got your own style- and that's what I want to talk to you about.

Vs.1 -- You see that ole ball is slowing down but your dreams are speeding up- That economic ladders growing faster and let's face it you aint keeping up- Obama's got a spending habit, he's a generational spending jack rabbit- Now its you he's selling out- and for this there aint no doubt- You're the new American slave-That's what this is all about -- That's what this is all about.

Vs.2 -- You know I don't mince no words --No I aint got time for all of that- But I give this time to you- Hell, you know it's the least that I could do.- Because you are my American brother from another mother- Before it gets to cold- You know that fortune favors the bold.-And that snake is coming around telln' you it aint maken' a sound- And its grip is getn' tighter-Its gonna squeeze till there aint no fighter -- And then what you gonna do -- All those dreams aint coming true -- All those dreams aint coming true.

Vs.3 - You need to walk out on this man -- Whose putting a curse on this here promise land-While your purse is getn' lighter --You say Code your just a Constitutional fighter- I'm telling you 16 trillion ain't no joke -- Turning all that hope into --Now you gotta cope- While this country's going up in smoke -- You know you're all goin broke. --The ball aint slamming down quite as fast- Hell your good times-They aint gonna last-Cuz your freedom suffered a concussion -- Remember this is America -- This aint Russia.

Vs.4- I'm not tryn to be no rock'n rapper- Hell, I'm a politician- I got dreams just like you- I'm calling to your recognition- You know I don't use dope -- Hell, I don't even smoke- But ole Uncle Sam's going broke- This aint what you call superstition. -- Why I'm tryn' to tell you about Obama-Gate -- I'm not tryn' to excommunicate -- But you don't wanna hear -- The loss of freedom and liberties your biggest fear -- I'm just like you -- Writing at my kitchen table- Tell'n you about Obama's fable -- Telln' you about Obama's fable.

Chorus: (insert between verses total 4)

I'm putting on my coat -- I'm walking out on this man (repeat 4 times) I'm putting on my coat-walkn out on this man- make me the promise land --make me the promise land. I'm putting on my coat --I'm walk'n out on this man -- I'm putting on my coat- I'll be your promise man -- Yeah, I'll be your promise man.

Your Promise Man- A Cody Robert Judy Band Original

The biggest crowd affected are young people, College, Highschool, its their dreams that the politicians in Washington DC are in fact selling with our debt and no incentives to stop the spending, after all they won't be in office by the time the other shoe drops.

It is with this concern that I have made the following rap song and put it together in a format that young people might be attracted to dig in and learn the truth of what is going on and how their futures are being sold.

I have a deep seated love for freedom and liberty because of the experiences I have had where the Constitution counted for nothing. In this situations and circumstances unfortunately a real appreciation for our rights our established.

I'm working on a rap sheet with the words that I will post soon, so stay tuned and check back here! Mean while enjoy. Please bear in mind that it is not the people who already believe in the Constitution that we need to engage, attract,inform and educate It is people who are not in our crowd yet.

One clip in the video of former Republican Candidate for Vice President Ryan, who many would say was on tract and defending the Constitution; yet you see he makes fun of those of us Birthers who are standing up for truth despite unpopular media coverage as we have recognized that the economic conditions in our country have indeed been compromised with the principles of our Constitution being flushed.

If leaders like Representative Ryan cannot afford to take a stand for the qualifications of the office of the President, we can safely say they are not willing to take a stand on our economy and disastrous debt. Its a pretty safe bet that these kind of leaders are not steering our Country in a direction that will maintain our freedom and liberties and that they are not concerned with anyone else but their own private motives of power and passing the buck on to us UNTIL they are not in office.

Your Promise Man - An upbeat rap song by The Cody Robert Judy Band exposes Obama's identity documents as altered and recites that he's not qualified as a natural born citizen, his long form birth cert is altered, his draft registration is altered which means we have a usurper in the White House.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-sVTov29ZQ4



Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODY JUDY

SCOTUS Election Challenge: Obama’s Operation to Amputate

SCOTUS Election Challenge: Obama’s Operation to Amputate

The progressive war on women continues with the Obama Administration as Obama considers a plethora of restrictions this week on the public’s right to bear arms, protected by the 2nd Amendment of the Constitution, Joe Biden has corralled as recommendations just waiting for the Executive Order and signature of Obama – a candidate for President who fails the ‘natural born citizen’ clause of the Constitution occupying the White House, whose using a social security number assigned from Connecticut and never has been a resident there, whose own attorneys are on record reporting his long form birth certificate is a forgery- whose own draft registration has been called by a criminal investigation of law enforcement altered.

Coming on the heels of Obama’s executive order granting him tax-payer funded Secret Service protection for life, The Sandy-Hook slaughter has had a major affect upon an emboldened Administration for restrictions against those suffering “any” mental health problems targeting and profiling the guns of any household with persons on mental health medications.

Now why would the Administration want to target all house-holds with anyone taking mental health prescribed drugs if they didn’t trust the drugs? It boils down to an assault upon the female gender or a complete lack of faith in the mental health drugs.

Statistically the major portions of the population suffering from mental health issues are predominantly women. In fact in Utah considered by many to be per capita the psycho-tropic capital of the United States it would easily dis-arm half of the population and house-holds. In fact about 25 or so guns caught in security checks out of Utah airports and the rest of the nation here.

Wither women are more likely to go see a psychiatrist for marital problems in counseling, more vulnerable to depression, more sensitive spiritually, or weaker in a physical confrontation, it all boils down to the female populations weaknesses that this administration is targeting and profiling because they would be the most affected by such an executive order.

How is this unwanted advance on gun and Wallmart ammo control and household gun confiscation to effect Women who have been sexually assaulted, raped, and been prescribed any psychiatric medication for stress? If signed into law, these women would be considered a sever risk to carry hand-guns, and their house-holds could be stripped of arms their husbands could use to protect them, leaving no protection other then steak-knives and base ball bats. Assaults happen within 5 minutes and so the police are nowhere in range to help.

Post traumatic syndrome, rape victims, an aunt, mother, teen-ager treated for depression, memory loss, forgetfulness, amnesia under the roof of any man who is a hunter and owner of guns would necessarily have to give up the guns in the household. If the Doctor didn’t ask you about guns in your home when prescribing such meds, then Doctors could be prosecuted for a felony.

Now Birthers have called these spécificités of Obama’s background that would prohibit his 2nd Amendment right to own, buy, or use a firearm because of a failed back ground check , a concern warranting criminal investigations, but it’s not fair to call Obama a criminal for hiding under the umbrella and cover of identity fraud simply because it hasn’t been prosecuted.

Newly elected Utah Attorney General John Swallow has invited an investigation by the United States Attorney General’s office in the alleged bribery scandal opened by testimony of Jeremy Johnson to eliminate any doubt of wrong doing; however Obama remains fearful of any Congressional hearings in his identity problems and an open court review of the qualification demands of the Office of the President. Why is Obama so fearful of this review in open court or Congress?

In Oprah Winfrey’s interview with Lance Armstrong’s came a review from Psychologist suggesting Lance’s personality dis-order highlighted by the ability to lie for years about taking performance enhancement drugs could have been the result of child hood trauma. Lance Armstrong hasn't just denied ever using performance enhancing drugs, he has done so in an indignant, even threatening way much the way Obama has treated Birthers. Both may be suffering from narcissism because they must be loved , have to be adored , have the ability lie to a camera, feels the truth has no value, and have built up a huge following on the lies that are told and thus the expectations are demanding. Now Armstrong may be cornered by the U.S. State Department for damages as a rep for the post office.

No one wants that kind of person, or the criminally insane armed and in the White House as President? Institutionalized persons can’t pass a back ground check, but neither could Obama if you run his social security number or honored his Jakarta State adoption by step-father Lolo Soetoro which allowed him to enroll and attend school. Now what good are records if we are just going to ignore them? Make no mistake Obama wants “your” medical records though?

Now, radio show host Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck continue to raise the warning signs of Obama’s dictatorial and tyrannical behavior, that most believing in the Constitution would call ‘insane’ and more then wrong-doing but a ‘crime’ and he’s in the White House! Do you see how fast the “label” of someone can affect you personally?

Recently former Presidential Candidate Jon Huntsman has made association with the“No Label” conference aimed at helping people find solutions rather than so much ideology with party and many Americans are getting sick of the Republican and the Democrat Parties. Obama seeks to label people, in a divide and conquer mentality and with that label "mental health" confiscate the house-holds weapons and suspend the Constitution. It’s no secret Obama’s own lies are to be permitted while Birthers telling the truth are put down. Labels are and can be more often used by the dictates of the eyes of the beholder. That is why Obama must be held accountable to the Constitution.

Rush and Glen both say there’s a thing called The Constitution and that it is a bulwark of law. Now they say executive orders are not meant for the President to get around or violate the Constitution. The Constitution defines our Country. It holds our country together. Obama’s signed 23 Executive Orders ( 144 total) on guns in the usurpation of the Constitution because no one will stand up against that? If Congress doesn’t stand up for the Constitution the Office of the President can wipe them, and all their work, out by executive order.

Executive Orders are not supposed to break the law, change the law, and they certainly are not meant to grant unfettered dictatorial power. The Legislative Branch is supposed to be the Branch writing laws. I want you to understand this.
Rush and Glenn both want you to know they would not lie to you either. Big question then: Why aren’t they Birthers? Why do they cover for Obama’s violating the Constitution in the natural born citizen clause in the Constitution?

So all that needs to happen is “accusations” of your mental unfitness by a doctor who orders and then prescribes a medications and bam your Constitutional Rights are non-existent? Should any women have a right to own a gun? Once you suffered from depression can’t you always be susceptible- once an alcoholic always an alcoholic? Glenn Beck admits he could fall off the wagon tomorrow. This is the mentality that has no bounds in its ability to suspend your rights by doctor’s orders, and thus your right to bear arms.

Do Doctors ever make mistakes referenced as SRE's (serious re-portable events)? Oh I think there were only half a million people mis-identified and operated on last year that were mistakenly assumed by doctors needing treatments like amputations and organ transplants. The wrong patients woke up without spleens or limbs that had been cut off accidentally, or an instrument sewed up inside them. With mental health issues you only need to look at the law suits of particular mental health medications recommended actually causing harm to know when it comes to chemistry many Doctors are actually shooting in the dark and to think that blindfolded they could actually prohibit your Constitutional rights is pretty legitimate for what American patriots would call political insanity.

How do you define “mental illness”? “Paranoia” often is a symptom of a mental health dis-order and many main stream media commentators who have called for confiscations of weapons from any household where mental health medications have been prescribed are indeed suffering from a delusional fear of safety and security. We don’t ban cars because of car accidents, but the solution to dis-arming all house-holds who have under the roof someone taking mental health drugs is actually palatable? How in the world is taking away from women the right to arm themselves against attackers palatable?

This gets into an assault upon religious beliefs to. Do you believe in the Holy Ghost? If you do, you need psychiatric medication? If you believe Mary conceived baby Jesus by Holy Conception are you insane? If you believe Moses received the 10 Commandments from God’s holy finger are you insane? You see how fast the entire Country can be called by an atheist believing doctor insane and in need of “psychiatric medication” and thus needs to be dis-armed?

How many people with mental dis-orders now won’t trust their doctors? I’d say Obama has done more to ruin the patient doctor relationship then any single person occupying the White House in the last month. When you consider the confiscation of guns and ammunition on every house-hold or under any roof where there is a person with a mental health issue you’re basically with one executive order able to dis-arm more than 50% of the population now armed. That’s why Obama’s going after the women on the mental health issue.

Lithium – Prozac – all the anxiety and depression drugs once used to help people now are used to target, profile and dis-arm American households. How’s that for progressive?

Now, why go over all of this, why discuss it? Well, the most important part of selecting a president is to find someone who understands these threats to your security. These are threats to your free speech, your right to bear arms, even your right to worship freely. These fundamental inalienable rights are under direct assault by Obama and he is unqualified for the Office of the President.

If your security demands upholding the Constitution then you have to find a President who at least understands the Constitution and isn’t a walking talking violation of the Constitution. People talk about people who have died because of guns, what about the people who have died for our Constitution? Has the Gov. of New York forgotten them in the Cuomo bill?

Statistically, Sandy-Hook is an anomaly but it doesn’t relieve the grief of the families bearing the grief and loss of their households; however, no law can bring them back to life again either.

How many of those parents seeing a perpetrator walk through their front door wouldn’t want a gun or use a gun to protect their children in a dangerous situation? I haven’t seen any suggestions such as a push button alarm put under every teacher’s desk that could sound a siren distracting a would-be perpetrator much like a bank has that notifies officials of a bank robber? Doesn’t it make more sense to protect our children then it does to protect our money? That makes more sense than dis-arming women who have suffered attacks based on their receiving any help in prescribed medications.

Laws are only as good as they are enforced and Obama’s occupation in the White House as an unqualified person for the Office of the President is a perfect shining example on the Hill that no matter the executive order or law passed by Congress we have an example in the White House of just how to get around the law rather than live by the law.

This has been the cause of my action in Judy v. Obama 12-5276 in the United States Supreme Court, which has thus far been evaded by the Court. The Chief Justice of the Untied States Supreme Court- Justice John Roberts received this letter today in the action.
Your item was delivered at 10:50 am on January 15, 2013 in WASHINGTON, DC 20543.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9fNjSTFI7_I



Cody Robert Judy


We need your help - America needs your help - http://www.codyjudy.us/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm Here is where you can help Cody.

The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
Cody Robert Judy for President
Plaintiff/ SCOTUS Case No. JUDY v. OBAMA 12-5276
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODY JUDY
FEC REGISTERED  http://fec-candidates.findthedata.org/l/4426/Judy-Cody-Robert
Candidate ID P20003372
Committee ID C00501593


Petition for Rehearing under consideration:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/113046270/Judy-v-Obama-12-5276-Petition-for-Rehearing


Writ of Cert under consideration Judy v. Obama 12-5276
http://www.scribd.com/doc/100156244/Judy-v-Obama-Petition-for-Writ-of-Certiorari-Revision-per-U-S-Clerk-Case-Analyst-Appendix-Stamped-Orders-Included

CRJ's Psalms 56+ Whom did George Washington say could protect America?

CRJ's Psalms 56+Whom did George Washington say could protect America?

Today I read from The Holy Bible Psalms 56 and I'd like to share that with you here with some beauty of this magnificent Earth God has created. David in the Bible new many times when the Government was in trouble and God helped him and Israel. The same God was given credit by our first President George Washington: "I am sure there never was a people who had more reason to acknowledge a divine interposition in their affairs, than those of the United States; and I should be pained to believe, that they have forgotten that agency, which was so often manifested during our revolution, or that they failed to consider the omnipotence of that God, who is alone able to protect them."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2UQMCIZrMDE


I hope all patriots will join me in a prayer asking the Lord to shed his blessings upon Chief Justice John Roberts who will receive this petition tomorrow (Monday January 14th, 2013):

U.S.P.S. # 0312 2120 0000 0747 4810
2nd Letter to Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court in the matter of Judy v. Obama 12-5276
http://www.scribd.com/doc/119974941/2nd-Letter-to-Chief-Justice-John-Roberts-concerning-Judy-v-Obama-12-5276

Thank you for joining me in this.
Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy

We need your help - America needs your help - http://www.codyjudy.us/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm Here is where you can help Cody.

The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
Cody Robert Judy for President
Plaintiff/ SCOTUS Case No. JUDY v. OBAMA 12-5276
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODY JUDY
FEC REGISTERED  http://fec-candidates.findthedata.org/l/4426/Judy-Cody-Robert
Candidate ID P20003372
Committee ID C00501593

Petition for Rehearing under consideration:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/113046270/Judy-v-Obama-12-5276-Petition-for-Rehearing


Writ of Cert under consideration Judy v. Obama 12-5276
http://www.scribd.com/doc/100156244/Judy-v-Obama-Petition-for-Writ-of-Certiorari-Revision-per-U-S-Clerk-Case-Analyst-Appendix-Stamped-Orders-Included

Eligibility Challenge Presents: Stripping Americans Down to the Bare Bones

Stripping Americans down to the Bare Bones

Often leaders are associated as coaches, navigators, pushing you towards what you hope will be a winning season. They can be hard on you like a drill sergeant whose sole purpose might be tearing you down so that you can be built back up even better. They will take you through drills that are seemingly harmless that you can see success with gaining your confidence in what they are doing for you.

They had every intention of making you stronger, recognizing who you were, and then all of a sudden the Coach says something like, “ I’ve been trying to break you down so I can rebuild you, but you just haven’t been getting it. So, what I’d like for you to do is take all of your clothes off and line up shoulder to shoulder, men on the right women on the left. “; and everyone just does it.

They go take their clothes off and put them in a little hole that is dug just in front of the trench they are lining up to. Their backs will face the trench when they line up shoulder to shoulder and they will be eager to hear what is going to happen next.

They understand that whatever happens, it is for the best and that sacrifices have to be made that basically eliminate complaints. Ultimately that is what they are sacrificing – the ability to utter a complaint. In order to act as one cohesive team there can be no division.

It is very important that everyone get into line. Order must be maintained. It is carefully pointed out that fighting, even discussion is not called for, and the ends will always justify the means. The weaknesses are exploited and ridiculed as complete and utter failures; even going so far as to breed contempt for them in favor of just doing what you’re told. Is that so hard?

Anger and ungratefulness replace wisdom and understanding. Gratitude to God is seen as contemptuous and weak mindedness and is used as a sign of deserving ridicule for obvious failures explained clearly in analysis of the mind.

Skilled politicians have been able to manipulate populist, nationalist, or racist feelings to advance authoritarian rule. We hear things like, “The system was broke to begin with, the scab has to came off before the wound gets better which means the band-aid must eventually come off too. I hope we can begin to see the bigger picture”

Indeed a party that can effectively paralyze a democratic government can blame the Constitution of a Republic, for checks and balances gone awry and get away with it, however, they must assuredly do so by violating the Constitution first, especially noticed in the Executive Branch, because adhering to the Constitution would be a violation of their agenda.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=5HeoxAmmxnI


It took all of 12 years for Hitler to rise to power and the reign of terror to hit the world from what seemed a defeated democracy in Germany wounded by disastrous inflation that ate away at the economy, the global Depression marked in 1929 when the United States stock market crashed exacerbating the situation as banks failed, factories closed, and millions of people lost their jobs.

The release of the Glass-Stegall regulations that Pres. Clinton signed off on created a wide open vacuum of trading that banks saw they could make a ton of money on, as the wall of security that separated commercial banking from investment banking collapsed.

Construction boomed as sub-prime mortgages, over 90% in 2006 for example, were adjustable-rate mortgages. These two changes were part of a broader trend of lowered lending standards and higher-risk mortgage products. Everyone no matter what the credit score or employment history could buy a house on an adjustable-rate with the promise to refinance later based on the increased value of the home.

Oddly enough, or not, Democratic Party bar-tenders ; the de-regulation by Clinton gave rise to financial regulatory reform by Obama. You may have heard of the phrase you can’t win for losing, but the Democrats say, “They couldn't lose for winning.”

"In total, the administration estimated the cost, often referred to as the hidden tax, of the 43 new regulations to be approximately $28 billion, the highest single year increase in estimated burden on record, resulting in thousands of lost jobs. This new burden is on top of the $1.75 trillion estimated burden of existing regulations."
--Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.), chairman of the House Oversight Committee, in a December letter to trade associations.



The biggest flaw was they did it with Obama who is not eligible by the Constitution’s demands for a natural born citizen, but to have done so without Obama would have also been a violation of what they were doing: destroying the United States Constitution from the inside out.

The Achilles heel of Obama has always been his eligibility per requirement of the Constitution for the office of the President Article II, Sect. I, Clause 5.

Now while you may understand a few things about Obama, this 3 minute video will show you a couple of things you didn’t know about Obama and its worth the 3 minutes especially if you think Birthers are crazy.

The crazy in Birthers has always been the fear of truth by Anti-Birthers because the eligibility of Barack Obama hinges the cover-up and in such the agenda to dis-arm America and in so dominate, control, and subjugate Americans.

The neo-fascist socialist movement has always demanded as many on the government pay-roll as possible, as many people unemployed as possible, and as many people dependent upon government as possible that translated into dependable votes based on the fear of losing anything you had coming or were dependent upon you couldn’t afford otherwise, be it health care, a roof over your head, or food.

The number now on food aid is historically high. The number stood at 46,224,722 persons as of October, the most recent month on record.-January’s will be worth the look. And it’s also true that the number has risen sharply since Obama took office now 15% of Americans reportedly on food stamps really makes you wonder about the unemployment number being reported fewer than 8%.

Obama has orchestrated a reliance on importing goods made from slave labor. Without penalizing companies like Apple for making products at below half of minimum wage over in China by demanding at least a minimum wage import duty America is not the place to make anything. If a country loses its ability to make a product its population is quickly regulated to working for the government.

You may have heard of the 300 openings at Delta Airlines for flight attendants receiving 22,000 candidates or US Airway 16,500 candidates vying for 450 openings. http://www.moneynews.com/Economy/US-Airways-Job-Delta-vacancies/2013/01/11/id/471013

The cycle with Apple one of the companies projecting growth in 2013 takes dollars out of America from otherwise employed people, marginalizes the country for a lower wage, and then demands we pay for it by buying a product which increases the wealth of a company hiding taxes in foreign banks.

It seems we are actually paying companies to find foreign slave labor because we have an anti-slave sentiment in our Constitution? This is of course the nature of pure capitalism that needs to find a stiff upper lip for at the minimum, a protection of minimum wage abroad, or an Act deregulating minimum wage for "piece-work" that employers won’t be penalized for.

Through a form of “Piece Work”, the dollar is put to our Country, spent here, and would be competitive to foreign slave labor. An incentive might be given to companies that maintained their minimum wage accounts through some sort of tax break. This is what I’ve been thinking about anyway.

We do necessarily need to level the playing field which is anti-American, because as it stands right now unless we make America a business friendly place and give incentives to companies to stay here, we will see a continued deportation of American jobs to leaner regulations that are set to beat Obama’s Regulations set up to empower a loss of freedom due to a economic collapse and necessarily strip Americans down to the bare bones.

3 Minutes ..If you think Birthers are Crazy!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=rrjU-HBkmLE







We need your help - America needs your help - Here is where you can help Cody.

The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign

Cody Robert Judy for President
Plaintiff/ SCOTUS Case No. JUDY v. OBAMA 12-5276
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODY JUDY
FEC REGISTERED  http://fec-candidates.findthedata.org/l/4426/Judy-Cody-Robert
Candidate ID P20003372
Committee ID C00501593


REVIEW LETTER TO CHIEF JUSTICE JOHN ROBERTS


http://www.scribd.com/doc/119974941/2nd-Letter-to-Chief-Justice-John-Roberts-concerning-Judy-v-Obama-12-5276

Election Challenge Update: Judy v. Obama 12-5276 United States Supreme Court Ltr. Chief Justice John Roberts

Election Challenge Update:
Judy v. Obama 12-5276 United States Supreme Court Ltr. Chief Justice John Roberts

2nd Letter to Chief Justice John Roberts concerning Judy v. Obama 12-5276 by Freedom&Liberty

http://www.scribd.com/doc/119974941/2nd-Letter-to-Chief-Justice-John-Roberts-concerning-Judy-v-Obama-12-5276
The 20th Amendment proves that the President elect may be found to be ineligible at any time by one with proper standing to ask the question. My action was initiated prior to the beginning of Obama's term, and has not been fully adjudicated by a judicial tribunal of last resort (in violation of 3 US Code 5). I still have standing to press this action seeking Declaratory relief as to whether Obama is an eligible natural born Citizen all the way to SCOTUS.

"If a President shall not have been chosen before the time fixed for the beginning of his term, or if the President elect shall have failed to qualify, then the Vice President elect shall act as President until a President shall have qualified".
"If the president shall have failed to qualify before the beginning of his term" clearly leaves open the possibility that he may be found ineligible AFTER the Electoral count.

SUPERMAN'S CLOUD 9 - The Eligibility Movement needs a Superman

Were any of the Justices of the United States Supreme Court even briefed on the case Judy v. Obama 12-5276?

I was encouraged about the news that Chief Justice Roberts at least referred Orly Taitz case to the rest of the Justices for Conference, however the conference is set for February, but it was better then him denying it himself. That's actually quite interesting.

I suppose we could use a Superman to uphold the United States Constitution's "natural born citizen" clause found in Article II, Section I, Clause 5 for the office of the President that Barack Obama is hot water with. Interesting note here from an anonymous com mentor who is basically saying "SCOTUS" has either no intel on the case, or is not interested in seeing to it that the Constitution's demands are upheld in the case of Barack Obama.

Anonymous Comment:
When a petition is filed the Respondent either files a response or waives its right to file a response. If it waives its right to file a response, and at least one Justice believes that the petition has merit, SCOTUS will call upon the Respondent to file a response. In your case, no response was called for, which means that your petition was "dead listed" - i.e., it was aside to be formally denied following the scheduled conference date. Your petition was never discussed at the conference on January 4. No response was called for, so your petition did not make it to the Discuss List. Look at the other birther cases which have been filed with SCOTUS and you will see the same pattern - e,g, Kerchner v. Obama, Taitz v. MacDonald, Berg v. Obama, etc.


Cody Robert Judy- January 9, 2013 4:48 PM
Well, I think you're right about that. That leads us back to the premise however that SCOTUS is not deciding the case. How could they even know what was in a case, unless it was noted to them by a Clerk? If the Clerks are against you, you have no access to a Justice?

If what your saying is true, not a single justice cared that the Constitution was changed by an Administrative Court Judge when it comes to the Office of the President.

That just doesn't make sense to me. I'd think if the qualification was going to be changed they'd want to make an intelligent ruling on it and consider it, especially given the Legislative Hard Line which has forbidden changes to the Art. II, Section I, Clause 9.

We do have the words of Justice Clarence Thomas who said on record the Justices were avoiding this issue.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=O7qEH-tKoXA


Well now to my new song -

Superman's Cloud 9- An Original By: The Cody Robert Judy Band -- The songs words apply to every man wanting to take on the qualities of Superman and embody the essence of love and attraction between a man and a woman who are feeling the chemistry and magnetic attraction pull them together. The song's inspiration came to Cody Robert Judy from the experience of January 5th 2013. The song was written January 6th,2013 by Cody.

Superman's Cloud 9 -- Words By: The Cody Robert Judy Band

Vs. 1 -- Ever had a woman treat you like a man- Believing you can be just like Superman? Well I met one last night I tell ya she's a prize- Met her on the dance floor- Caught me staring at her thighs. Then I looked up and saw fire in her eyes. Well you know you're not all that, but you're doing the best you can- For you wanna take that ride -- Be like Superman.

Vs.2 -- Put your hands around my waist --Feel my Superman case. You know I'm hard as hell- That aint nothing I gotta sell.- I'm the man of steel -- That you can plainly feel- But your kiss is kryptonite -- I can hardly put up a fight -- With your arms around me -- I am Superman tonight.

Second Chorus:
You put your arms around me -- Everything becomes clear. With my hands around your waist -- Everything disappears.

First Chorus:
You wanna take a ride with me -- Because you think you can -- Take a ride to cloud 9 -- Cuz I'm your Superman- I'm your Superman -- I'm your Superman -- I'm your Superman -- I'm gonna be your Superman -- I'm your Superman.


SUPERMAN'S CLOUD 9

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6bM1oxYvp4