Sunday, May 15, 2016

SPECIAL REPORT: BIRTHER BOMB SHELL - Hillary went after Obama in '12 Used Ally Trump

SPECIAL REPORT: 

~BIRTHER BOMB SHELL ~
        Hillary went after Obama in 2012 Used Ally Trump        

They say politics makes strange bed-fellows, what else could be said when we found out that GOP presumptive Republican Party nominee Donald Trump was telling the truth in more ways than one, with his claims the cartel in DNC's coronation of  Hillary Clinton started the Birther Movement. It's all about POLITICS and the scorpion tail had not lost her sting from the loss in 2008, as we find from both closely guarded allies of Mrs. Clinton and a string of private informants that have spoken up in strictest of confidentiality concerns from sources deep within the Trump Camp, Clinton Camp, and the FBI Camp closely associated with the criminal investigation associated with Hillary Clinton's confiscated Private Server in the surprising confidence of the only Candidate for President with a Bi-Partisan Federal Court Record holding up the [natural born Citizen] requirement unique to the Office of President and VP with his law suits against McCain and Obama culminating in recent Judy v. Obama 14-9396.

It's one thing to call someone a "Racist" who demonstrates very deliberate tendencies of superiority for any particular color, especially in our politic arena given our 13th Amendment and quite another to 'Frame' someone with the Racist label wrongly in America given the splendid melting pot and diversity of our Nation. What is revealed is the sickening willingness and deliberate  racial frame-job of a Politician running for President in the Democratic Party more concerned with power at any cost then about helping minorities.

Hillary Clinton has demonstrated over and over again her willingness to use specific characterizations of the order of chromosomes in 'color' and 'gender' as tools to push into office, and to not only hop on the bandwagon but start the bandwagon to serve her political agenda and it's gotta stop and be seen for what it is- racial and gender profiling.

BRING THEM TO HEAL 

It's no secret there was a very bitter feud between Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton in the 2008 Presidential Election. They fought very bitterly right down to convention time where you'll find in an earlier post entitled: SPECIAL REPORT Understanding Trump's Claim Hillary Clinton - "First Birther" ,(the details of which might be helpful to review at this time for the reader),  more expressly given more than one witness claiming they expected all along former President Bill Clinton to step-up against Barack Obama's ineligibility as a [non-citizen] at that national convention.

QUICK REVIEW OF Q. [natural born Citizen]
For reviewing purposes let us very quickly establish the unique qualification of [natural born Citizen] [ie. born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents] not to exhibit any abnormal atypical characteristics of racism associated with color or gender. The 15th Amendment-of the US Constitution stated (Amendment XV), ratified by the states in 1870: "Section 1. The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude; and the Nineteenth Amendment (Amendment XIX) prohibits any United States citizen from being denied the right to vote on the basis of sex.

Neither of these Amendments to the United States Constitution changed the differing Qualifications for the Offices of President, Senator, or Representative that differ in [TIME] expectation requirements to assume the varying offices. Being born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents does not have to do with chromosomes, it has to do with TIME of allegiance and jurisdiction that reflect a maturity of the qualification. The Amendment missing in action would be one allowing any [Citizen] to run for President and that has not been passed though 8 attempts have failed just since 2003.

If any particular Nation cannot legally protect it's citizens with boundaries and borders, the status of Nation is completely lost and so it goes with every nation country on the Planet Earth. Furthermore, if their is no expectation of a Nation in the United States of America, all positions set forth in the U.S. Constitution are rather invalid and moot. Let those in those positions forever remember that in their prospects of globalization. Citizens of the World have never participated in any election of a World or Global Leader and thus are not represented by any means in any form of Democracy and until such time as that feat is every accomplished, never will be. Leaders getting together and voting for Leaders is not a Democracy of world citizens any more than the leaders of the Democratic Party are elected by Republicans.

We have shown very quickly the [natural born Citizen] time requirement of born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents is not related to an irrational or unlawful discrimination of gender, race, color, or previous conditions of servitude, but relates to a qualifications of TIME and JURISDICTION predominate associated at both the time of birth and recognized in a compliment of other qualifications of maturity (35 years of age) and residency (14 years a resident) of an individual in adulthood. In this we have shown the Media Representation of [BIRTHER's] as [Racist] to be wholly incredible,disingenuous, and mendacious.

HILLARY'S PUSH TO DISLODGE OBAMA IN 2012
Hillary's Campaign had become burdened with debt had sky-rocketed to 12. 4 million to 500 creditors, and she had lost it at a height and in a fight she knew was unfair, unconstitutional, but she'd gambled wrong in her own racist strategy feeling guilt rather than simply understanding the Constitution and taking a stand. She'd lost but it had not been fair to her on principle- eight years was too long to wait and a scheme to oust Obama was hatched for 2012 by Clinton herself using an ally and contributor of hers named Donald Trump. He was perfect to bring it to a head and she'd have her revenge.

Hillary Clinton had tried the same route Trump would use in 2016 to oust Sen. Ted Cruz but she didn't quite do it with the same result. She would not label him ineligible on stage, but she would covertly drop the hints hoping it would fly with the public and the Democratic Party. Obama had something going for him, he had inherited his fathers' chromosome and he claimed every 'hint' of Clinton's he was not qualified via the Constitution was 'racist' and 'religiously intolerant'. It stung her and gave Obama a foot inside the party instantly.

Obama would win in 2008, but that didn't stop Hillary Clinton nor remove the foot off the gas. She would visit August of 2009 as the Secretary of State the British agency which oversees Public Records Archives and the purpose was to .. well Obama's father had just been found in previously lost Kenyan Records in series RG36 as a British Protectorate and they had revealed Obama's father had a son listed born after 1960 but before 1963. Obama's father had wanted desperately to stay in the U.S. and with a son born in America as a parent of an American Citizen that under normal circumstances would have been relatively easy, but Obama's late father made no such claim about his son. Why? He knew also Obama to be born a foreigner to the United States and to be the son of a foreigner.

Mr. Penn had done polling for Bill for six years; he also had advised Clinton in her NY Senator ship terms and was a chief strategist in her 2008 Campaign for President.

WASHINGTON TIMES:
[A key Hillary Clinton adviser told her that she may have to consider resigning as secretary of state after President Obama was caught telling Russia’s president off-mic early in 2012 that he could make more concessions on missile defense after November’s U.S. elections.
In addition, Mark Penn told Mrs. Clinton that Mr. Obama’s not-so-secret words “may be about the stupidest thing ever said by a president in foreign policy.”
Mr. Penn’s advice was made public on New Year’s Eve as part of the court-ordered release of Mrs. Clinton’s emails from her time as America’s top diplomat, when she used a private email server rather than the offered state.gov account. This had the effect of rendering incomplete years of document searches under open-records and oversight laws.]Mr. Penn went ballistic in an email to Mrs. Clinton that very morning, under the subject line “if true.”
“To explicitly say he is laying low on nuclear defense policies because of his election right now and tell your opponent that is to politicize all foreign policy, evidence [of] weakness that can be exploited by others, and undermine the administration’s credibility,” wrote Mr. Penn, who was chief strategist for Mrs. Clinton’s 2008 presidential campaign.Mr. Penn then warned Mrs. Clinton that “you will surely be asked if your decisions and positions are part of the election campaign and bat that down definitively.” While Mr. Penn fretted near the end of the email that “maybe I’m overreacting,” he tells Mrs. Clinton that she “may even consider resigning if that’s the case” that her foreign-policy decisions are motivated by domestic politics. ]

What we are shown here is a continuous fracture between Clinton and Obama's loyalty lines and for certain motives besides "convenience' asserted by Hillary Clinton for her private server, which was also encouraged by some who were working in Obama's State department, but who may have had more loyalties to Clinton to begin with including Patrick Kennedy whose distinction run a course closer to Clinton then Obama. Obama had given Clinton a long rope in recruiting her own team as Secretary of State.

Patrick Kennedy was closely  involved with the failure to approve requests for additional security in Benghazi and Tripoli, ordered State Department employees in Europe be barred from attending Sen. Barack Obama's speech in Berlin on July 24, 2008 to ensure they displayed political neutrality. Kennedy labeled Obama's visit as a partisan political activity and he forbade employees from attending. He was noticed on the [emails as being correct copied] in discussions of setting up Hillary Clinton's Private Server while working in the State Department.




Hillary Clinton was on the front row of Donald Trump's wedding nuptials, but didn't bring a gift for the wedding in 2005. Did Hillary Clinton think she was attending her employees wedding? Donald Trump had contributed to her in 2002, 2005, 2006, 2007, and most importantly he favored her in the 2008 election with contributions.

 When Mr. Trump was criticized for his contributions to Hillary Clinton he has always stated he gave as a 'Businessman' in the overview of political favor. He asked Clinton to be at his wedding and she was. This is generally understood and in New York Trump stated that giving to Republicans was not the essential in business though his contributions to Democrats tapered off dramatically after 2008 and his contributions to Republicans picked up in 2012. The reasons will become apparent. 

What is less widely known is the interaction between Hillary and Trump Charities. Clinton's association and chairmanship of The Clinton Global Initiative and Trump's own Charity Association 'Trump's Charitable Foundation' and the favors that have gone back and forth between Trump and Clinton's Charities. Its a way of being paid for favors, but not being paid directly, although that line of thought doesn't sit well with the IRS.  Trump's $100,000 to Clinton's Charity definitely places the two in very friendly circumstances out of all the charities for Trump to choose from.


[Trump’s foundation also has a history of giving paltry donations to organizations benefiting veterans while doling out enormous sums to various evangelical and political organizations as well as the Clinton Foundation.

Tax forms examined by The Daily Beast show that in 2009, the Donald J. Trump Foundation gave a whopping $100,000 to the Clinton Foundation (then called the William J. Clinton Foundation). The following year, Trump’s foundation, a registered 501(c) group, gave another $10,000 to the Clinton Foundation.]

TRUMP's TALK WITH PRES. CLINTON prior to ANNOUNCING his run for PresidentMINT PRESS NEWS
[Just this week, Trump came under fire for a private telephone conversation with President Bill Clinton that took place just weeks before Trump announced his candidacy.]

WASHINGTON POST described that call this way:
[The tone of the call was informal, and Clinton never urged Trump to run, the four people said. Rather, they said, Clinton sounded curious about Trump’s moves toward a presidential bid and told Trump that he was striking a chord with frustrated conservatives and was a rising force on the right.
One person with knowledge of Clinton’s end of the call said the former president was upbeat and encouraging during the conversation, which occurred as Trump was speaking out about GOP politics and his prescriptions for the nation.
Clinton aides declined to speak on the record about the call, saying the conversation was personal.
“Mr. Trump reached out to President Clinton a few times. President Clinton returned his call in late May,” a Clinton employee said. “While we don’t make it a practice to discuss the president’s private conversations, we can tell you that the presidential race was not discussed.”]
[And on Wednesday, Trump wrote in a Twitter message: “Do you notice that Hillary spews out Jeb’s name as often as possible in order to give him status? She knows Trump is her worst nightmare.”]

That begs the question: Why does Hillary Clinton consider Donald Trump her worst nightmare in his eyes, not to mention that up to this point Hillary Clinton as a Candidate for President is recorded as having spent the most of any candidate running for President on either side of the republican/Democratic party isle against Trump, a whopping 5.2 million dwarfing even Sen. Cruz at a little over 4.3 million. 

A LOOK AT DONALD TRUMP's Rise in Politics VIA the BIRTHER CARD - ON ASSIGNMENT FROM HILLARY CLINTON?

Have you ever wondered how it was Donald Trump came to be called The Birther King?

He never filed a single legal paper in court, or supported a single Presidential Candidate with any money for public relations, court fees, or a Campaign with Standing against Barack Obama.

Yet during this time he was being hazed by the Media, even by Barack Obama himself at the famous Washington Correspondence Dinner that was featured in 2011 noticed beginning at 1m29sec.

The roasting of Donald Trump in front of the entire Media by the defacto President of the U.S. during the Correspondence Dinner of 2011 will not be forgotten soon, and must have had Donald Trump whispering "my day is coming" when your all going to regret this humiliating strategy.


As you may or may not recall it was on The View co-hosted by Barbara Walters that really was the catalyst of Mr. Trump saying he thought Obama should release his birth certificate as is detailed in the following Video for those who missed it, or have forgotten it.



Trump at the time infused a lot of hope in the whole nation that Congress would pick up Congressional Hearings against Obama, but Trump's actions, (also noticed as his in-actions), or partial actions based on his less than hopeful contribution record and veiled promise of an investigation in Hawaii , were noticed as flaccid and was particular convenient politically for Hillary Clinton.

What had happened was that Donald Trump had gotten out of Hillary Clinton's lose lips, that Obama was indeed not a [natural born Citizen] He had not been born in Hawaii to Citizen Parents and was thusly not qualified for the Office of the President.

She had confided to Trump that she and Bill were about to blow that whistle in 2008 but had been viciously threatened after the murder of Bill Gwatney. The revelation coming with a veiled threat understood by more than one witness.

This gave Trump a political inside move against Hillary Clinton, but it wouldn't be in the Democratic Party who would not correct their own. It would have to be in the Republican Party the other major movement in America, but who knew how well they would receive him as a friend of Hillary Clinton. The Democratic Party apparently has no qualms with Hillary loving Trump's Contributions nor are they interested in Trump's work for Clinton in the apparent political thrust to move Obama out early leaving her as a favored choice.

While Trump 'claimed' donations to the Clinton's procured 'favors' as in "he told Clinton's to show up to his wedding and they did", they in fact were the one's he was working for and he was the one they were using.

 Trump was their little hump 'whipping Birther-Boy', meant to try and dis-lodge Obama before the 2012 Election if it were possible because Hillary Clinton's age and health problems were making themselves known and a 2016 run was not nearly as inevitable as a parachute run would have been in 2012.

Hillary Clinton called in some favors, especially to Barbara Walters a senior corespondent at The View. Trump would appear and exacerbate the public with, "I think he should produce his birth certificate". 

Obama may have 'wondered' about the relationship favor Trump had shown to Hillary Clinton with known contributions to her 2008 Presidential Campaign but when Trump spout out on the View, "I think he should produce his birth certificate" he said what all of America was thinking, and what he did removed any doubt for Obama Trump was Hillary's Humpty-Dumpty-Birther-Boy. She was trying to oust him early and he was left with little choice but to produce what she thought he never would or could from what she had gathered in 2009.

The festered and wounded campaign relationship exploded again that Obama had hoped had gone away, and a planned departure was advised by one of Hillary's closest strategist in 2012 and leaked. She'd have to put some distance between them or risk being framed herself, but in the mean time Hillary had been using the position of Secretary of State to leverage her own finances to the Presidency.

If Obama had used the 'race' card to stay in, she would use this Achilles heel of Obama to grow under Obama's nose a billion dollar empire.

The plan was foiled when after 3 years Obama procured a long-form birth certificate April 27th, 2011 in front of the World and the White House Press Core. This implicated him directly.  That came under a law enforcement investigation prior to the 2012 Election at the request of the Arizona Tea Party and Sheriff Joe Arpaio's Cold Case Posse Officially announced in March 2012 after a 1500 hour investigation of the document that it was a fraudulent or fabricated document.

Donald Trump would play it up, but would never commit extensively to the Arpaio Investigation and never appear in public with the Sheriff. He would threaten sending a team in Hawaii, because he knew it was a false document from the get-go, but never did- his "handlers" in The Clinton's with their plan for the 2012 Election being time-sensitive had turned their sites from the office of the President to leveraging foreign powers and Trump was left holding the "Racist" label all because Hillary had failed to use the Constitution as a good Politician protecting a friend would. He'd remember that, and turn on her like she'd never expect.

With the cover of Obama's Fabrication being pulled out from under him a greater leverage had been acquired then the Clinton's' could have possibly hoped for. They now could do almost anything and assure Obama's State Department would be looking the other way in the time remaining she had as Secretary of State. Hillary Clinton resigned in 2013 and never looked back.
The 'racist frame job' had been horrible, but Trump didn't do the job Hillary gave him to do on the basis that he would shoulder it with any self-deprecation. She was a Democrat, and she had started it, that would be easy enough to deflect on to her. He just needed the meaningful reason to deflect it, and that came about as we have seen in Trump announcing his run in the Republican Party - something the Clinton's were even taken aghast with their knowing what he knew and wondering just how much of it would come back to them.
Trump would be roasted as a racist for nearly a whole year, even by Comedy Central's "Roast of Donald Trump", but he was smart enough to turn even that into a liquidation of cash as they paid his own Charity $400,000 and Fox News gave the Trump Foundation $10,000.

Trump slowly begin to turn the tables and to do back to the Clinton's what they had done to him. As the Birther issue came up again and again he simply begin refusing to talk about it and reminding everyone that Hillary Clinton was the original Birther "Hillary Clinton wanted those records" he said, "McCain wanted those records", Donald Trump got something..I don't know what the hell it was, but Obama produced something he would tout.

He would brilliantly pull Hillary Clinton closer to him, rather than push her farther away. He would disclose what he knew to be the truth.


Using the power of the Tweet Donald would disparage Hillary Clinton as his "partner", and he would not have to say anything else about the Birther issue because it made Hillary Clinton every negative thing she had disparaged about him, and she was the original one fighting against Obama in the 2008 Presidential Election, it just made sense.

The Media was incensed with this. How could they label their presumptive nominee a Racist just like they had Donald Trump all on the predication of The Birther issue. They would gang up on him and beat him to death with it, but it just wouldn't work.

As much as they hated to admit it, there was a 3 year lapse between Obama entering the Presidential Race and his procuring a long form birth certificate. Sheriff Joe had been elected by his own constituency five times in 1992, 1996, 2000, 2002, 2004, 2012 in the 4th most populated county in the United States of America.

It was true,the Department of Health in Hawaii via any grandparent, relative really, living in Hawaii requesting a birth certificate, would send the report of that request out to the newspapers to be published. The newspaper articles of Obama's birth did not procure any more of a substantiated claim of a live birth in Hawaii than Obama's social security card
being procured by the death of someone else who used it prior to him, something that was common for those trying to get a birth certificate who did not have one.

Not one hospital in Hawaii of the two Obama had originally claimed had 'claimed' him or set a marker of honor for having been the first breathing grounds of a U.S. President and worst of all if Obama himself had secured the $10 request to the Hawaii health Department in 2008 none of this would even be happening.

The Media seems to want Trump's Tax Returns like vulgarizing advocates of transparency when they had failed to even vett Obama's legitimacy allowing him to be elected not once but nearly twice without an original and with a the testament of  a law enforcement investigation that by Obama's own hand three years later, he dispensed his own birth's fabrication from the White House Press Core room.


One might be asking is there any evidence whatsoever of Hillary Clinton in 2008 dropping the hints Obama was not born in the United States? There sure was.
Obama's own campaign rated Hillary Clinton's Camp in 2008 racist promoting the idea he was not born in the United States and was not a Christian. Obama's Campaign Manager [ Plouffe described circulation of the picture as part of "a disturbing pattern". "It's exactly the kind of divisive politics that turns away Americans of all parties," he said.][The Obama team wheeled out Scott Gration, a retired air force general and Obama supporter, who was with the senator in Kenya, to explain the picture.]

Obama's Campaign as well as Obama knew then exactly as the Huffington Post just this year reminded all, [No, I’m not trying to say Hillary Clinton is the equivalent of Trump, although both have utilized race and Islamophobia to attain political power. As a Democrat, however, Clinton should be held to a higher standard, especially since black voters in South Carolina and throughout the nation are the key to any hope at winning the White House. When Patterson writes, “Clinton refused to state unambiguously that Mr. Obama is a Christian and has never been a Muslim,” America saw a more nuanced version of Trump’s vitriol.]

The March 28th , 2016 letter was sent from Obama's Department of Justice stating they had no interest in the United States Supreme Court mis-leading the public in their docket report of Case Judy v. Obama 14-9396 from the detailed report Mr. Judy had given to them found here.

Indeed both major parties are involved with this but it is going to take the American People some resolve to understand it.



CRJ






Sincerely,
CRJ

Here's the Link to Contribute if you'd like to Cody's Campaign improve your record for Taking A Stand for the Constitution.
 www.codyjudy.us


Thank You!


Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy Campaign
Cody Robert Judy



Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.

Web Site www.codyjudy.us
Keep coming back!


INSPIRING - I believe in You


Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!





Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION


1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts

12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial

13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008

14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case

15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.









































Wednesday, May 11, 2016

POLITICAL JUSTICE - THE CLINTON CRUZ AFFAIR If Justice is in the Balance Who is Judging it?

SPECIAL REPORT
______________________________

POLITICAL JUSTICE - THE CLINTON CRUZ AFFAIR 
If Justice is in the Balance Who is Judging it?

____________________________

Stunningly self-percolating is the thought that Political Justice has replaced Justice, but the headlines at The Hill pondered "Justice's reputation hangs in balance of Clinton Probe", giving rise to the preponderance, "If Justice is in the Balance who is Judging?" Of course the answer is all of us, each one of us, with the moral compass within each one individual.  

Within the context of the FBI Investigation of Hillary Clinton's sabotage of over site by We The People in committing her correspondence in the Office of Secretary of State to her private server, we are left with a jurisdiction question only? 

Who employed Hillary Clinton? It's not a political question. She worked for The People of the United States and now we know that the State Department of Obama was definitely in on the action of setting up Hillary Clinton's affair on the people. 

That's right she had a responsibility to The People with their paying her in her job and she deliberately went and set up a system outside our jurisdiction requiring the 100-150 FBI agents over the last year to assess damages, and spend all of their time figuring out for The People, what went wrong, who made the decisions, and how it can be fixed and discouraged from happening again. 

As I read the the report I just shook my head at the Reporting that is subject itself to all of us scratching our head wondering how this would make it past an Editorial Decision? From the Article:


This 'line' seems incredibly deceptive reporting as the FBI has not released any reports [According to reports, federal prosecutors and FBI investigators have yet to dig up evidence that could lead to a criminal indictment]

Why hasn't the Hill include
d a Report of the Emails Jan 24, 20[09] that showed Obama's State Department fostered the Private Server of Clinton especially for purposes of avoiding FOIA? 
[Emails January 24th, 2009 ' The Stand Alone Separate network PC is [a] great idea From under-secretary for management Patrick Kennedy of the State Department CC: Huma Abedine, Daniel Smith
Also- January 24th, 2009 Luwis Lukens former Deputy Secretary of State and Executive Director of the Secretariat [set up stand alone PC in the Secretaries Office connect to system but not through our system to enable her to check her email from her desk..] CC: Huma Abedine, Patrick Kennedy, Daniel B]
Source:
http://codyjudy.blogspot.com/2016/05/special-report-why-democrats-must.html

Let's all remember in this Clinton sending Email is not what' this is about. Of course others have done that in her position, her defense of the practice diluting the poison publically hoping for a digestible version staying the hand of criminal indictments and also whipping up fall-out if they are not. What does she hope for? A few cities to be burned if the FBI brings charges against her? Some people are dumb but generally they get the idea it is not solving their problems if they end up sitting in her ashes verses her sitting in her own.

 The facts completely change when you focus the fact on Clinton setting up a Private Server all her government on-the-job daily email went through completely out of the over site of We the People in her job we hired her for, unless by Court Order, [she] was Ordered to produce them. Get that? She! 

Why couldn't the State Department produce them? Because [she] had the only access to them.

That's what it took, and Hillary did go through and line by line decide what [she] was going to produce, and what [she] was not. Mission Accomplished, purpose of a Private Server revealed and yes it was convenient. 

Of course if we are talking about Justice Hanging in the Balance by Clinton's Probe, we would scarcely be scratching the service of The U.S. Supreme Court Justices having already flushed it down the toilet by denying to the poor access to Justice in Judy v. Obama 14-9396 which called for their defense of the Constitution's requirement that the Office of the President only devolve upon a [natural born Citizen] ie. born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents - foreign citizenship by soil or parent prohibited in the United States of America's highest office. Yes, its reserved for Americans under the Supreme Law of  the land encompassing the borders every office of the Government is sworn to in their oaths.

That brings the relevancy of the following comment I made in a follow-up of my last Post featuring a Obamaconspiracy.org Post.

CRJ May 11, 2016 at 12:11 pm (Quote) # 
[Dr. Conspiracy: I think that Donald Trump connects well with the frustrations felt by many Americans over how things are going. The problem is that people like Trump are the cause of those frustrations. It’s not immigrants and people of color that are causing hard times for lower-middle class and poor white folks] http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2016/05/trump-blames-hillary-for-the-birthers/
CRJ:
Agreed.. People like the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court arbitrarily denying a motion for forma pauperis in Judy v. Obama 14-9396 when the motion clearly placed petitioner below Federal poverty guidelines., and we could add the people who agreed with the Denial.
Wow! That means most people here are like Trump though they pretend they are not?
[bob: Of course, “Obot” is a nonsense word without meaning — I have no idea how to meaningfully define the term in a manner that would not apply to all Americans who voted for President Obama.]
CRJ:
Kinda like “Birther” applied to anyone intelligent enough to qualify PRES, Senators, and Reps Candidates running with the basic Standard of the Constitution.
Oh.. Wait-A-Minute that’s more People than voted for Obama.
http://codyjudy.blogspot.com/…/special-report-birther-issue…
Heard Sen. Cruz say today on Glenn Beck the aggregate contribution in Media and Contributions towards his 9 month campaign was $500 Billion. He said Trump got that in 1 month lamenting the focus in disparity had singed him.
The remark in my mind was 500 Billion in a Constitutionally unqualified Candidate for the Office placing in perspective the intolerable Denial of my forma pauperis Motion in context to printing cost and filing fee at most $5,000.
Of course my case was not against Ted Cruz, but named his contribution to the problem half-a-dosen times in Official Court Record.
500 Billion as a contribution to the problem is only a portion of the pie one might further elaborate upon.
The staggering consideration ought to melt the skin off every Justices Face who had a hand in the Review Denial and the absolute horror upon the poor be remembered in history.

Let me just clarify something for Trump supporters who will take offense to the recognition that Trump by his own analysis has been part of the problem of American Businessmen employing slave labor over seas. It was a rather interesting analysis that Harvard Professor Lawrence Tribe who Mr. Trump quoted as saying Sen. Cruz was not eligible for the Office of the President, was also the one that was quoted as finding over 800 items made between  Mr. Trump and Mrs. Trump by the hands of people not requiring U.S. unemployment taxes and the minimum wage.

Now what businessmen wouldn't turn over a new leaf to appeal to the American workers if they would make him President?

I myself believe indeed it may be the lack of reality in what we now days call Establishment Politicians that has turned against the American People in the harnessing of foreign slave labor.

I  can hear the Congressmen telling us the "Chinese" People really don't mind, our employment at 65 Cents an hour sustains them in rice while at the same time hiking the minimum wage up to $15/hour here, which fully collaborates and exacerbates the reason American businessmen are taking their business hired labor out of the U.S. to increase their profit margin. Why don't we just call Apple and Microsoft Owners the new plantation owners exempt from the 13th Amendment who see 'fair' as 'profit loss'?
The Thirteenth AmendmentPassed by Congress January 31, 1865. Ratified December 6, 1865.
Section 1.Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.
Section 2.Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

Trust the left, and often their choir boy Glenn Beck, to threaten a doomsday panic of Armageddon proportions if Tariffs, Good and Fair Trade Deals were negotiated, and an escalation of prices made on goods by foreign nations went higher if Mr. Trump were to become President, without any idea that Federal Income Tax was instituted in 1913 and the United States did make much more money in Tariffs than income tax taken from their own Citizens prior 1912.

Why pray-tell has everything gone up for us, and down for Foreigners? Explain away. What would happen if Federal Income Tax went down? Perhaps Americans have more money in their pocket to decide whether to buy the import foreign product or the domestic product made in the USA which puts our people back to work with an incentive of producing something that is needed?

Whether putting Trust in Mr. Trump, (who at least raised the Birther Qualification Issue for Barack Obama wherein on April 27th 2011 he took credit for the release of the long form birth certificate being delivered to the White House Press Core by Mr. Obama, which by the way Sen. Cruz never raised on the Senate Floor one time but has glamorously claimed his staunch defense of the Constitution) is wise as more of a business minded person than a politically perverted one claiming the Constitution and stabbing it in the back the next hour remains the Public's choice as Judge.

I've long said I could not do this alone, and that is a fact. Although my candidacy is officially declared, and my stand for our Constitution I managed to the U.S. Supreme Court, the help I needed to further the cause has been missing. You can blame the Media for not telling the people only if the Media actually told the People and the people still didn't care. We herein are now still left with the People not being told, yet debating questions with far less intelligence then they deserve and that is why Justice is hanging in the balance.

As God produced the United States by countless testimonies of miracles , and in our borders we espouse Justice for All, we will not escape it.

CRJ

POSTSCRIPT: Obama's State Department - ONE MORE COVER-UP “Now we know the Obama administration consciously refused to give up key information about Hillary Clinton’s email in 2014. It covered up this email both from the court and Judicial Watch. MAKES YOU WONDER if Clinton has the goods on Obama's Birther Jock Strap #Democrats ,”http://www.westernjournalism.com/judicial-watch-state-department-hid-key-clinton-benghazi-email-for-years/

Sincerely,
CRJ

Here's the Link to Contribute if you'd like to Cody's Campaign improve your record for Taking A Stand for the Constitution.
 www.codyjudy.us


Thank You!


Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy Campaign
Cody Robert Judy



Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.

Web Site www.codyjudy.us
Keep coming back!


INSPIRING - I believe in You


Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!





Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION


1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts

12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial

13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008

14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case

15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.








































Monday, May 9, 2016

SPECIAL REPORT: BIRTHER ISSUE IN THE 2016 ELECTION TRUMP v. CLINTON Understanding Trump's Claim of Hillary Clinton being "First Birther"


FEATURED EDITORIAL
The Post & Email
_________________________________
SPECIAL REPORT: BIRTHER ISSUE IN THE 2016 ELECTION 
Understanding Trump's Claim 
 Hillary Clinton - "First Birther"
____________________________

THE TRUTH TO TRUMP'S CLAIM THAT 'HILLARY' WAS THE FIRST "BIRTHER"

Why the denial of Judy v. Obama 14-9396's forma paupers is more about Cover for Murder
and why arbitrary denial is suspect for the cover-up in the U.S. Supreme Court.
____________________________

Sometimes I think being a Federal Declared Official Democratic Party Candidate for President who is mostly covered up, accept by the Federal Election Commission, is a call to be a Reporter. Maybe write some things Reporters and Newspapers hate Blogs for because of their heightened ability of Free Press? Let's face it Barack Obama's motive for getting into the divorce/custody records of his political opponent in 2004 was indeed about "reporting" a Republican's marital infidelities.

In a quick review, Jack Ryan had been a successful Businessmen prior to his U.S. Senate campaign in 2004 against Barack Obama and for a community organizer to out do a successful businessmen with a net worth of tens of millions of dollars, in Illinois getting elected would need some gasoline. You need some real dirt for fire combustion against your political adversary and tapping the guilt of Ryan in front of Republicans 'moral code' was designed as a well justified plan in unsealing his divorce/child custody records leading to his withdraw.

Ryan would later complain it was really an unprecedented maneuver. Jack Ryan has characterized what happened to him as a "new low for politics in America".[15]According to Ryan, it was unprecedented in American politics for a newspaper to sue for access to sealed custody documents. Ryan opposed unsealing the divorce records of Senator John Kerry during Kerry's race against George W. Bush in 2004, and Kerry's divorce records remained sealed. Ryan subsequently made a statement requesting "Let me be the only person this has happened to. Don’t ask for Ted Kennedy’s. Don’t ask for John McCain’s. Don’t ask for Joe Lieberman’s. Just stop. This is not a good precedent for American society if you really want the best and brightest to run."

The desensitization of the Public has nearly come full circle for the Clinton's as they face the new generations of voters learning all about the part Hillary Clinton played in her own enabling of Bill Clinton's indiscretions that produced thousands of dollars in fines for them to pay off.

Bill Clinton Reported by multiple witnesses 2008 as going to bring the Birther
Qualification Principle up at the Democratic National Convention in 2008
against Barack Hussein Obama - but never did it. Speculation remains it was
a calculated truce between Obama's and "Hillary's" being elected after Obama.
It's really never been about liking Bill and Hillary Clinton as imperfect people, they are likable enough, but rather a commitment to the Truth that America has a deep yearning for which the Clintons' have constantly gotten in the habit of withholding or politically shaping for the public in ways most perfect for them.

Who knows why the public wants the Truth or if they prefer to be treated as children in a family?

What is it exactly that is hoped for in the accomplishment of revealing Truth?

Whether getting to the Truth is to 'justify' behavior by pointing out misdeeds of people who are elected in the misfortune we all know of every finding someone perfect, or if its based on the simple respect we hope they have for us, our vote to put them in the seat of authority, to handle the truth in a way greater then being treated in a child-adult relationship, I'm not sure, but what we do know is that TRUTH can be hard for Politicians to bear when it is testifying against them. There's a long line of politicians who have found their fortune, fame, and political seat wiped out with the revelations of truth, so there must be something to it that is not over-rated.

THE TRUTH TO TRUMP'S CLAIM THAT 'HILLARY' WAS THE FIRST "BIRTHER"

Why the denial of Judy v. Obama 14-9396's forma paupers is more about Cover for Murder
and why arbitrary denial is suspect for the cover-up in the U.S. Supreme Court.

In Obamaconspiracy.org's latest Post by hard-working Kevin Davidson aka Doc whose worked for the chagrin of Birthers tirelessly in the field of dis-claiming Obama's ineligibility with now over 4,000 Post, the latest Post entitled Trump blames Hillary for the birthers got my attention because he claimed not a smidgen of evidence exist that ties Hillary Clinton to being a Birther.. ever.

That's a pretty bold claim as the question first should be asked that, "If a Candidate for a Government Office can first be found by an opponent ineligible for that office by the very plain and simple qualifications listed for that office, making it a very easy race to win, shouldn't that be made?

 The very first line of attack, not the last line, should be in answering the question, "Is the person Qualified according to the Constitution outlining the basics?". We all should be in agreement on that.

I mean its rudimentary, elementary, and even an insult to the intelligence of Hillary Clinton to suppose she would not be considering the basic Qualification questions in the advent Presidential race regarding a political opponent, which makes the assertion that everyone including every Presidential Candidate isn't a Birther an insult to intelligence.

Now compound that with every constitutional scholars opinion I've come across as the Qualification Question of [natural born Citizen] is unsettled in the Judicial Branch's Highest Court and you have even more substantial reason to confirm all Candidates for President should be Birthers or they are dumb and stupid totally ignoring Congress's eight failed attempts to change it since 2003.

This explains WHY the Birther Movement is so big. Its' an adherence to the basic Principles of the Qualifications for the Highest Office in our Government.

We start with the first comment I made on Doc's Blog refuting his theory that 'no evidence' exist tying Hillary Clinton to being the first Birther as Trump asserted that he would raise the issue against her just like she would raise it against him. That makes it a very hot-button 2016 Principle Issue demanding Facts from Fiction ,the Public's, Media, as well as the Court's and Congress's attention. Three Video's below detail these facts.

Trump says SHE'S THE ONE WHO STARTED IT


CRJ May 9, 2016 at 10:49 am 


According to the Law Suit Petition of official record filed in the United States Supreme Court Judy v. Obama 14-9396
The Clintons were the original “birthers,” according to multiple witnesses including Bettina Viviano who told WND in an interview in Los Angeles.
“Everybody who has called this a conspiracy from the Republicans or the tea party, they need to know who started it – the Democrats,” she said.
“It was Hillary and Bill, and it percolated up from there,” said Viviano, who had access to the campaign through a documentary she produced on the claims of delegates that Obama and the Democratic National Committee were stealing the nomination from Hillary.
Viviano said that she was on a conference phone call during the primary season in the spring of 2008 in which she heard Bill Clinton refer to Obama as ineligible for the presidency.
In the course of the phone conversation with Hillary delegates, she recalled, Bill Clinton spoke of Obama as [“the non-citizen.”]
[Michele Thomas], a Hillary campaigner from Los Angeles, confirmed to WND that she learned from “many people who were close to Hillary” that Obama “was not eligible to be president.”
She claimed, however, that Bill Clinton’s intention to unequivocally state to the public that Obama was ineligible was stopped in its tracks by the murder of a close friend of the Clintons, Arkansas Democratic Party Chairman Bill Gwatney, just [two weeks] before the Democratic National Convention in Denver.
Gwatney was killed Aug. 13, 2008, when a 50-year-old man entered Democratic Party headquarters in Little Rock and shot him three times. Police killed the murderer after a chase, and investigators found no motive.
The Clintons said in a statement that they were “stunned and shaken” by the killing of their “cherished friend and confidante.”
Viviano said a campaign staffer who was close to Hillary, whose name she requested be withheld for security reasons, told her Gwatney’s murder was a message to Bill Clinton.
“I was told by this person that that was ‘Shut up, Bill, or you’re next,’” she said.
The campaign adviser, according to Viviano, said that despite the intimidation and threats, Bill Clinton was prepared to speak out about Obama’s eligibility
“And then,” Viviano said, paraphrasing the staffer, “they went in and said, ‘OK, it’s your daughter, now, we’ll go after.’
“And then Bill never said anything.”
Others in the campaign who believe Gwatney’s murder was a message to the Clintons think it had to do with the fact that Gwatney was resisting an effort by the Obama campaign and the party to intimidate Hillary delegates into voting for Obama.
But Viviano argues that California delegates also were rebelling, and she says her source told her the same story two years later.
“I had never voted in my life. I wasn’t a Democrat, I wasn’t a Republican. I wasn’t anything,” Viviano said. “I didn’t know anything about any of this.”
Viviano said that when she and her co-workers informed Hillary campaigners that they were making a film about voter fraud, “the floodgates opened.”
“I mean, everybody had a story to tell about death threats, threats, intimidation, document falsifying, vandalism, property theft,” she said. “It was the most horrible thing I’ve ever heard in my life.”
Viviano said that in research for the film, allegations and evidence that Obama was not eligible “came up immediately.”
“We were getting hit with so many things about Obama,” she said. “This is when (Bill) Ayers and (Rashid) Khalidi were in the news, and then, all of a sudden, ‘Oh, and he’s not eligible to be president.’”
[Viviano was a Neutral Witness Politically Speaking]
Viviano insisted to WND that her reason for speaking out now was not related to the fact that Obama beat Hillary.
“It’s not about Hillary,” she said. “It’s about No. 1, I’m American, I live in a country where there is a Constitution and a set of laws. I also have somebody in the White House who has lied, obfuscated, provided what we all know to be forged documents about who he is.”
She acknowledges that she could jeopardize her Hollywood career.
“What can you do?” she said. “It’s my country. My dad fought for this country in World War II in the 82nd Airborne.”
Her late father, she noted, was shot down twice during the war and was awarded two Purple Hearts.
“I think, would he rather have me sitting in the corner cowering, and afraid of people, or would he rather have me tell the truth and what I saw?”
Viviano today is an avid Anti-Trump advocate and Hillary Clinton is on Record in her 2016 Campaign of having spent 5.3 million against Trump, more than any other candidate on Record.
Not acknowledging the Facts and Witnesses is paramount to participating in Cover Up.
The exaggeration of Clinton’s never being Birthers may be of the Type which only acknowledges self- testimony in being a Birther, and excluding in that Qualification Eligibility, but Anti Birthers have expanded their interpretation of Birthers to be any question of ineligibility with the Standard of Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents.
So any Qualification Question by Clinton’s in the past can easily be paraded under the Birther Tent.
I find the credit of Clinton exaggeration of Trump as Islamophobic and an isolationist actually much harder to digest than Trumps claim Clinton was a Birther based on evidence.
Trump’s claims to stop SYRIAN Refugees until they can be properly screened for Radicalism for the safety of Americans has been exaggerated extremely into isolationism and Islamophobia.
That’s taking Fair Trade and National Security as far out in left field as you can go for Political Points and to influence Votes.
Trump does not have to travel out to the extreme right to advocate an Official Record of Clinton’s Birtherism, and only the most naive fool would not consider that line of attack on a political opponent to be the Constitutional Right and thus credible in an attempt to Win.
Murder and the threats of more murder would quite naturally be about the only extreme to silence the Constitutional claims from going main stream by first tier Candidates.
This jives with the story of Viviano.
Docs Remarks
Dr. Conspiracy May 9, 2016 at 10:56 am  (Quote) # 
The story is ludicrous, and lacking in specifics. Who corroborates Viviano’s remark about the conference call? Who are these “many people close to Hillary”? This is the sort of junk that WND publishes. It has no value.
See:
CRJ: “It was Hillary and Bill, and it percolated up from there,” said Viviano, who had access to the campaign through a documentary she produced on the claims of delegates that Obama and the Democratic National Committee were stealing the nomination from Hillary.

CRJ's Remark
CRJ May 9, 2016 at 2:55 pm  (Quote) # 
Dr. Conspiracy: The story is ludicrous, and lacking in specifics. Who corroborates Viviano’s remark about the conference call? Who are these “many people close to Hillary”? This is the sort of junk that WND publishes. It has no value.
Maybe the question should be “How can you disprove her Report at an Event you had nothing to do with?
Several factors affect witnesses’ credibility. A credible witness is “competent to give evidence, and is worthy of belief.”[1] Generally, a witness is deemed to be credible if they are recognized (or can be recognized) as a source of reliable information about someone, an event, or a phenomenon.
That’s exactly why a Court of Law is about the only way for you to establish your Claim that she is not credible. I highly recommend your own well established past of sitting on Facts rather then stirring fiction is one to be admired and one you should consider in this instance.
The oath of Testimony is one that credibly we both would agree needs to happen, and Bill and Hillary Clinton would definitely qualify as “Witnesses” to appose Viviano’s claims and I’d be happy to call them if a Trial is offered.
Short of that, your own claims of corroboration are subject to political pious.
Just another reason why Judy v. Obama 14-9396 really is much more relevant to the Truth I would think you were hoping to defend?
If anything, my Report is Recorded in a Court of Law in an attempt to be heard, whilst your’s is in the public wind of innuendo.
Of an interest to the Public in this matter would be two women's testimonies recorded and seen below as well as the gunning down of the subject who killed Bill Gwatney with the public dash cams of the Officers involved in the chase, and killing; along with Bill Gwatney's wife who in 2008 was chosen and very closely monitored as you see in her delivery of Arkansas delegate count at the National Democratic Party Convention. The first video in the car chase is somewhat graffic discretion for minors is advised.
Bill Gwatney dash-cam Police Kill/Murderer Link/ and Corsi Interview Michele Thomas




and a Quick 34 second partial Betina Viviano Interview with Jerome Corsi that is included in Judy v. Obama 14-9396



The adage that it is better to support a lie than the truth is an embarrassment to any political party hoping for credibility with the Public. The truth is there are reasons, witnesses, and Official Court Record that support Hillary Clinton being a Birther that are supporting Trump in his Claim Hillary was the first Birther and to disclaim that Official Testimony under oath is needed and required. We have definitely seen Clinton's testimony vary a little from public statements to statements made under oath.

In my opinion Hillary Clinton would only do herself credit by admitting it's intelligent to question and recommend a Trial be held on Obama's qualification to settle very important questions like, "Was [Obamacare] even signed by a legitimately constitutionally qualified person in the Office of the President or is it 'moot' by that missing?" This is a very important question that faces the public in choosing the next administration.

To contrast even the relevant facts that are brought forth in this very small report is to indulge in the swamps of fiction and delusion wholly reducible. This is what so many Media Reporters have done in either their political cow-tow to editors or publishers or whatever, amounting to a massive cover-up and little appetite for Truth fueling the anti-establishment movements they seem to be pulling their hair out about. If you want to credit the total collapse of Trust with the Public in political establishments this is a good place to start. Few Reporters will even admit to that they are in such a hypnotized delusion. 

If #Democrats choose Cody Robert Judy as their Presidential Nominee ALL they hope for, ALL they dream of, ALL they Espouse in their Platform is seen as Possible and True in the eyes of ALL THE WORLD and choosing the opposite promotes disrespect and dishonor. 


There is still time for that choice for Democrat Delegates, the FBI, and Hillary Clinton but we need your support to help with that. If you believe there is power in Truth please support us.
 
POSTSCRIPT: Obama's State Department - ONE MORE COVER-UP “Now we know the Obama administration consciously refused to give up key information about Hillary Clinton’s email in 2014. It covered up this email both from the court and Judicial Watch. MAKES YOU WONDER if Clinton has the goods on Obama's Birther Jock Strap #Democrats ,”http://www.westernjournalism.com/judicial-watch-state-department-hid-key-clinton-benghazi-email-for-years/

Sincerely,
CRJ

Here's the Link to Contribute if you'd like to Cody's Campaign improve your record for Taking A Stand for the Constitution.
 www.codyjudy.us


Thank You!


Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy Campaign
Cody Robert Judy



Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.

Web Site www.codyjudy.us
Keep coming back!


INSPIRING - I believe in You


Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!





Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION


1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts

12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial

13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008

14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case

15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.