No Leg to Stand on- The Justices denied Judy v. Obama 12-5276

My ,- Our- ;), "Petition for Rehearing" with the U.S. Supreme Court was "Denied". ; /

Makes me feel bad because they wouldn't even hear it and in doing so they have basically, officially squashed the "natural born citizen" qualification for President in the Constitution without a word or hearing.

http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=%2Fdocketfiles%2F12-5276.htm

I just feel terrible they wouldn't even let us have an oral argument on it,just locked us out.

You know I can hardly believe it. I wish I had one of the Justices cell phones because it just doesn't make any sense. Without being able to speak with them we are left to take the "Clerk of the court's word" for it.

Because of the process I've been through I know its entirely possible they didn't see the case and some Clerks black-bagged it, but there's no way to talk to them. If not that, then you wonder if they are so threatened that they feel the compromise is in the broader interest of the agreement;say someone's got a nuclear pointed at NY, and they simple are black mailed, which is entirely possible.

Faced with that situation what we any of us do? Say good bye to 8 million Americans in NY? God.. that would be hard.

Frankly, I think we are in a hell of a situation here and the "agenda" of what's going down is just going to blow us away when its fully understood. I mean when the FBI, CIA, SCOTUS, Military and Congress say its okay to forge birth certificates and lie your way to the top what do you say? "We tried", that's pretty pathetic but that's about where we're at.

If I hadn't been through what I've been through with the SCOTUS Clerks I might have more faith that the Justices had indeed reviewed my case. Its the actions of the Clerks of the SCOTUS themselves, that I can not deny, that make me suspicious that the Justices haven't seen their way to this case.

These actions I am left to contemplate myself and if I had not been the recipient I would have nothing to say, nor would I probably believe it if someone was telling me as I am you.

But ... I don't think there is anything to do about it either. I'm scratching my head. The good thing I do know, is that if its a pit they're digging for our Constitution, I'm sure they will find themselves in the pit they had dug sooner or later. I hope that's not the case but God won't see our Constitution die though it may hang by a thread, the thread won't break, in this I have faith.

One thing I do share is the frustration of many Americans who 'trust' their leaders and those they have elected to do the right thing and defend the Constitution. We have proven that Congress was shammed with the CRS Memorandums about Obama's birth certificate and that thousands of letters have gone out to the public with the advice of the sham perpetrated by Jack Maskell. Here's a review if you missed that.





We know that Congress was manipulated. We know that Obama passed out documents certifying his birth that were manipulated. We know his lawyers know that his long form birth certificate and short form and selective service card were manipulated making them non usable for official purposes.

We know that Obama's purported father disqualifies him from being President. We know they all know this, and that they know we know, they know we know they know, however those elected leaders in Congress that can do something and should do something about it won't.

Is it embarrassment because they have all been snookered? Is it a deep seated hatred they have for the Constitution itself? Is it power unchecked that once they get to Washington DC numbs their brain and head?

Perhaps its the snake that they feel isn't coiled quite tight enough for them to throw down the gauntlet on Obama's eligibility so we can at least have a president who fills the natural born citizen requirement of our Constitution in the White House as a commander-in chief who isn't a walking talking violation of the Constitution?

Do Republicans still feel cozy about watching Obama make a mockery of the Constitution and a mockery of them in economical protocol and the economy with a 16 Trillion dollar debt that is going up 100,000 every 6 seconds, to a Government who offers no palatable smidgen of sweet to reducing their spending?

Ever wonder how both the Iraq war and Afghanistan War could be over and our Government figure out a way to spend even more money now?

So often with the victors of war go the spoils, and Obama is spoiling our Nation and I don't think this is a place even anti-birthers, including the media, who somehow retain a verifiable certifiable belief that nothing is amiss when it comes to Obama's eligibility in the face of professional law enforcement investigations on the matter, and with what a little homework could uncover.

We're left thinking they don't like home-work, or they just don't think it matters all that much. That is definitely one way to think. Perhaps understandably they think, "No single individual can stand up against all of this because so many people are involved now."

Credibility, integrity, honest, virtue, even the moral fiber of our society is at risk because those in charge put it all on Harvey Dent... ole two face himself: Barry Soetoro/Barack Obama, whichever one he is when he turns profile. You've seen Obama cast as the Joker, but Harvey Dent who turned into Harvey Two Face makes more sense.

No one raised the roof about Obama being a U.S. Senator and there he was living the dream of a Kenyan Born lad who had literally overcome so many odds.

Somewhere in between the time Obama was a U.S. Senator and the decision to run for President he crossed a line and now we have Obama two-face and what seems all of our Government, on both sides of the isle, defending the very acts of fraud and forgery most would go to prison for perpetrating at the powerful and important level of the Office of the President.

Well, like Nixon said he believed, " When the President does it it's not illegal", only difference between the mentality of the media now verses the mentality of the media then was Nixon was a Republican, and the media now shares Obama's feelings rather then apposes that view.

Ronald Reagan appointed three United States Supreme Court Justices and many people don't recall that was superseded by Nixon appointing no less than four United States Supreme Court Justices, when wondering about justice being blind then as compared to now.

There is one slimmer of a positive to note here in the contemplation of the actions here by the United States Supreme Court Justices and that is the broader view that the United States People are gaining of them and of the integrity of the United States Supreme Court.

Of course as you may have been introduced to in a blog of mine before, justice is not always right, even at the highest levels. Many many people have not been exposed to such thought. Its almost new to them even though people as myself have suffered the injustices for years.

I am happy to have many many more people join me in the ideology that justice is really fucked up in this country by most every official anyone knows. When you can count on one hand the law officials willing to knuckle down on Obama's ineligibility and the fraud and forgery present in this nefarious cover-up, and realize the paltry handful of people with integrity who are elected officials, you gain an understanding of being victimized by the un-lawful actions of officials representing the law, and how that feels.

Yes, I'd say Obama has done more for America then any person in the White House, when it comes to America gaining a empathy and understanding for those oppressed in prisons, set up, accused falsely, and having their Constitutional Rights abolished and stripped away.

Where are my 2nd Amendment rights to defend myself after I did the time society asked? Obama's taken my guns away and now he's after yours.He'll get them to, you watch.

These poor fatherless bastard Congressmen will tote up to him to; you can't trust them as far as their oaths. If their oaths meant a red-cent nickle to them they'd be opening up Congressional Investigations and Sheriff Arpaio and people like myself would be called in to testify on the matter of Obama's fraud & Forgery docs and his ineligibility.

Look what (Congress)they've done to your "natural born citizen" demand in the Constitution America. Threw that out like a piece of toilet paper they'd just blown their nose on or wiped their arse on.

I feel sorry for most American's now who "think" they have a 2nd Amendment Right or any rights, because Obama's closed the hamper on his dirty clothes or eligibility, and Congress isn't about to do Obama's dirty laundry.

You know I used to be an avid hunter too. Really enjoyed the sport. The Governments basically told me I can't have any self defense to myself. If someone wants to pull up and shoot away they can shoot anyone whose ever had a felony pretty well get away with it. Of course that's what the Government does and sadly we've seen it witnessed time and time again.

Government decides they see someone whose peaceable assembled at home and pretty soon here they come with their S.W.A.T teams and warrant-less search and seizures capacity armed with nuclear weapons if necessary and blows you to away to kingdom come. The hunters in every state might as well start sucking the wind-pipes of their deer rifles now.

I'm sorry to say this, but there is nothing right now between you and a clean Bill of Rights and you're own law enforcement people in you're own home town in you're own home state are witnesses that what I'm saying is the truth because they are in on the cover-up of Obama's fraud and forgery and his ineligibility! They are in on it, and helping Obama as his mice!

You think this through. If every Sheriff was calling every Governor and telling them they had thousands of people at his door clamoring about Obama's fraud and forgery expecting him to complain and the Governors had every sheriff in every county hankering, Obama and his mincing Congress wouldn't be more than another week in office.

That's the God honest Truth of the matter. Now you know the reason that the Republican Party is through. Its over. They are no longer the party of conservatism and if your American and conservative you need to understand this. The Republicans in office right now are not worth the manure out behind the barn as fertilizer.



The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
Cody Robert Judy for President
Plaintiff/ SCOTUS Case No. JUDY v. OBAMA 12-5276
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODY JUDY
FEC REGISTERED  http://fec-candidates.findthedata.org/l/4426/Judy-Cody-Robert
Candidate ID P20003372
Committee ID C00501593




Petition for Rehearing under consideration:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/113046270/Judy-v-Obama-12-5276-Petition-for-Rehearing





Writ of Cert under consideration Judy v. Obama 12-5276
http://www.scribd.com/doc/100156244/Judy-v-Obama-Petition-for-Writ-of-Certiorari-Revision-per-U-S-Clerk-Case-Analyst-Appendix-Stamped-Orders-Included

SCOTUS Election Challenge presents: The Standing Argument Wipe Out

UPDATE: Friday - Jan 4th, 2013
I have been informed that a more comprehensive understanding will be generated Monday at 9:30 AM from the United States Supreme Court on case 12-5276 Judy v. Obama http://www.supremecourt.gov/

SCOTUS Election Challenge presents: The Standing Argument Wipe Out... again.


The pesky "Standing Doctrine" again haunts Orly Taitz again at the Ca. State Supreme hearing challenging the electoral college vote count, just as it did in California Courts in Keyes (Barnett) v. Obama which went to the 10th Circuit Appeals Court and was met with rejection because none of the plaintiffs who were running in 2008 continued their run for President in 2012.

Throughout Birther History, or since the dawn of Obama's opposition to the Constitution's demand for a 'natural born citizen' required by Article II, Section I, clause 5, "STANDING" has been the biggest challenge and a Presidential Candidate is needed for standing.

Orly didn't have a presidential candidate as a plaintiff today in the State Supreme Court of California ... again. Pastor James David Manning had me testify at the CIA COLUMBIA OBAMA SEDITION AND TREASON Trial, specifically because I had 'Standing'as a Presidential candidate who suffered harm in the general election. It was very compelling for the jury who found him guilty to understand my campaign had been formidably hurt and maliciously maligned by Obama's belief he could run on a different set of rules then are outlined by requirements in the Constitution.

When lawyers who have been told over and over and over again they have to have a petitioner who has "standing", or in other words are hurt by the action very directly and thereby substantiating good cause that a restraining order is sought for, what makes them think they don't? I don't get it.

It hurts the whole Birther movement accept for accounting for negative publicity. That should be the first line of offense for a plaintiff, not the best defense for the defendant. I am sorry for the money Orly spent and her effort, because I had hoped for the Constitution.

However,WE in the Birther movement have known and do understand the "standing" argument, made very clear or if we don't we should know greater standing is achieved with a presidential candidate straight from O's defense lawyers.

Report from the Tribune on Orly Taitz attempt to halt electoral college vote count.
http://www.sanluisobispo.com/2013/01/03/2345384/judge-rejects-birther-challenge.html

You know what. I've been involved in some 13 case in the Birther Movement and none of mine have been dismissed because I lacked "standing". That should tell people something. The most important or acknowledged pronunciation of judgement coming out of any case I've been involved in was either a 'guilty' verdict as happened in the CIA COLUMBIA OBAMA SEDITION AND TREASON TRIAL or , a ruling that in fact over ruled with the 14th Amendment the demand for a natural born citizen made in Article II, Section I, Clause 5 in direct violation of construction laws prohibiting that action.

This is what is being heard tomorrow in conference of the United States Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama 12-5276.

The worst part of this is not being able to be a fly on the wall in the conference.I won't ever know what Justices voted to hear the case and which voted against hearing the case. Every member of the Supreme Court of the United States will be there, its not just a single justice of the United States Supreme Court, they will all vote thumbs up or thumbs down to hear this case. I need a majority of the Court to give me a thumbs up to hear it. I need 5 thumbs up of the 9 Justices.

Just as a refresher course "standing" is best understood by the following three criteria:
Standing requirements
There are three standing requirements:

1-Injury: The plaintiff must have suffered or imminently will suffer injury—an invasion of a legally protected interest that is concrete and particularized. The injury must be actual or imminent, distinct and palpable, not abstract. This injury could be economic as well as non-economic.

2-Causation: There must be a causal connection between the injury and the conduct complained of, so that the injury is fairly traceable to the challenged action of the defendant and not the result of the independent action of some third party who is not before the court.

3-Redressability: It must be likely, as opposed to merely speculative, that a favorable court decision will redress the injury.

In light of this one can understand how being competitively in a race with a campaign that is hurt or maliciously maligned with another candidates fraudulent practices in the race can account for a sincere standing.

If the Court refuses to hear my case tomorrow it won't be because of 'standing' that's for sure. A negative response may be purely political rather than suited on constitutional principle.

The standard pillar which stands center court in our Constitution as a principle is the qualification that the President be a natural born citizen. If foreign influence can perpetrate the Office of the President the affect is no less than having a nuclear bomb at the center of the Constitution.

Its easy to remember with the New Year being 2013, that 13 of the 48 pages of The Constitution pamphlet are referenced to the President, far outweighing any other constitutional principle by at least 10 to 1.

What does that say to you if for instance you wanted to destroy the Constitution? What office do you do it through?

A great spectacle has taken place in front of the America populous just the last 3 weeks over what? 435 Members of the House of Representatives 100 U.S. Senators and how many in the Executive Branch- One - have positioned themselves over the U.S. Economy.

Obama upped the ante from 800 Billion to 1.6 Trillion. Obama effectively just beat the hell out of 435 Representatives who were shaking in their seats with fear that they would be saddled with the blame if the largest tax increase in history went into affect.

Rush Limbaugh's side kick announced yesterday, that Republicans were no longer the party of tax cuts. They have effectively ponied up to the Democrats and done so after repeated kicks to the groin in which a condition of blue-balls was developed. Having a case of blue balls is often worse then the case of not having any at all.

One wonders why on Earth the new Republican House doesn't throw down the Constitutional gauntlet and open up investigations into the eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama rather then fighting with one hand tide behind their back continually?

The Electoral Votes are being counted and Objections to the Vote could open up such an investigation. I have standing and would be happy to testify in front of Congress of the malign done to me and my campaign for President due to the "rules" that Obama has run under verses the "rules" the rest of us have run under.

You know, many times in our department of justice things happen that aren't or don't seem fair to one or more persons. Some guy gets off with a technicality that we have to honor because if we didn't it would deprive others of the same right. Sir William Blackstone himself said famously- 1765 " It is better to let 10 guilty go free than to let 1 innocent suffer" and I agree.

What the Untied States Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama 12-5276 and Congress is deliberating in Obama's ineligibility however is justice for every American, not just Obama. Every America is being affected by our economy and payroll tax increases, income tax increases, wither it be by a job that is not created because that money is sent in, or wither it is from the shrinking of one's business rather than the expansion.

Those who are wealthy from assets are not really going to be affected that much, so if your rich already kudos to you. Raising taxes on income may have been the surest way to shrink an economy that was immediately available. The Constitution's eligibility demand for the Office of the President to be a "natural born citizen" may be the surest way to shrink Obama's pen that is immediately available.

Please pass it along and help any way you feel you can.

Cody Robert Judy
A New Ride
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZDRTVakr7NI




Doritos- Has Justice been Jacked Women? 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tqbwN8wzEhg





http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9fNjSTFI7_I




If you'd like to help Cody in the fight at the United States Supreme Court please contribute here:http://www.codyjudy.us/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm


The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
Cody Robert Judy for President
Plaintiff/ SCOTUS Case No. JUDY v. OBAMA 12-5276
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODY JUDY
FEC REGISTERED  http://fec-candidates.findthedata.org/l/4426/Judy-Cody-Robert
Candidate ID P20003372
Committee ID C00501593

Petition for Rehearing under consideration:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/113046270/Judy-v-Obama-12-5276-Petition-for-Rehearing


Writ of Cert under consideration Judy v. Obama 12-5276
http://www.scribd.com/doc/100156244/Judy-v-Obama-Petition-for-Writ-of-Certiorari-Revision-per-U-S-Clerk-Case-Analyst-Appendix-Stamped-Orders-Included

SCOTUS Election Challenge 2012-United States Judges banking on the Wrong Buck?

SCOTUS Election Challenge 2012 presents:
United States Judges Banking on the Wrong Buck?

As the breaking of the dawn unfurls upon a New Year sliding across the Nation as a dark shadow giving way to the light, we contemplate January 4th wherein two big things are going to happen: 1) Congress by HJ 122 resolution has agreed to count the electoral college vote rather then January 6th or 7th or 8th: & 2) The United States Supreme Court will take into Conference Judy v. Obama 12-5276 which is basically an election challenge to Barack Obama's eligibility for the Office of the President made by another candidate for President, myself,Cody Robert Judy. This is a good time for all of us to contemplate our futures.

A Day late and a Dollar short many United States Judges have been hedging on upholding the Constitution in the Barack Obama eligibility scandal banking on the buck of futures, understanding what many have called the 'death knell' in a ruling that actually upheld the Constitution's demand for a 'natural born citizen' in the Office of the President as demanded by Article II,Section 1,Clause 5.

Denial of due process, discrimination against other presidential candidates, upholding voter fraud, elections fraud,identification fraud,document fraud,social security fraud,contributions under false identification fraud, all have roots in upholding Obama's occupancy in the White House over and above the Constitution's demand that only a 'natural born citizen', born in the U.S. to Citizen parents, or absent all foreign influence as natural law affords, dawn the Office of the President.

In an abbreviated form its a type of domestic terrorism or assault upon the United States Constitution. In the long form the hole gets deeper; the Judges banking on future appointments and rewards.

One of the most logically upheld statutes that has not been assaulted in the Constitution, which I think may even be harder to overcome than the 'natural born citizen' clause, is the "two-term" limitation of the President. Bill Clinton couldn't over come that one.

If we do have to wait it out another four years those Judges are in fact banking on the very short term of Barack Obama's tenure, which will indeed be replaced. Case in point, pit-bull attorney Larry Klayman, a former Justice Department prosecutor and the founder of Judicial Watch and Freedom Watch- authoring latest book called “Whores: Why and How I Came to Fight the Establishment.”, recently cited in a WND article:

http://www.wnd.com/2012/12/obama-eligible-only-to-defraud/#wwAa8ZtTPFkGh5rs.99
[In a recently filed case in Florida, which I timely filed for Democrat Michael Voeltz, following Obama’s latest fraudulent caper in the Nov. 6, 2012, presidential election, the Leon County Circuit Court judge, the Honorable (sic) Kevin Carroll, even said as much in his week-old, two and a half page, hastily written order dismissing the case – where he made reference to his former Circuit Court “judicial buddy” having been recently nominated and sworn in by Obama as a federal court judge to preside in a courthouse down the street. Carroll obviously hopes that his largesse toward Obama will someday similarly reward him with a federal judgeship as well.]

When betting on the Buck, Obama's horns are about two years away from being a lame duck anyway, so I'm not so sure he's the right Buck to bet on? Americans have a really nice way of patiently waiting for justice. It may not come tomorrow as we hoped, but it will come!

Which of these Bucks would you bet on for the future, one who has about two years to go, or one whose got about eight years of future in the White House?

I don't know what god these Judges are praying to, their religious practice is not my concern, but they may need religion a lot sooner then they supposed on the record of their performances against the United States Constitution in the biggest scandal to hit this Nation's history books. Their bet on futures is about as stupid as placing it all on a two point buck deer rather than and eight point buck deer who waits just inside the tree-line obscure from view right now.

When the truth comes out, and the truth always comes out, I don't think these men and women will be able to get a job judging a rodeo or an elementary art contest. Their careers are in ruins already, they simply haven't got the memo yet and that should be the message to Judges across the Nation who swore oaths to the Constitution; not Obama.We should not discriminate against Obama for not being a natural born citizen. Obama deserves the truth of the Constitution just like anyone else.

You know another up and coming President appointed and elected by WE THE PEOPLE, just might unfurl the biggest ring of impeachment trials this Nation has ever seen! Where in the hell will these Judges hide? I can tell you right now as I recall a scripture verse that says something more about the caves and rocks rather than under a desk.

Klayman put it very nicely I thought:

"As of last Friday, despite the urgency of resolving Voeltz’s presidential election challenge, Judge Carroll was still sitting on our motion for rehearing, despite our renewed emergency request to grant us a hearing, vacate his dismissal order and allow my client Voeltz due process of law. According to his assistant, with whom I spoke late that day, the judge was indeed in his office all week, perhaps now hiding under his desk for cover. Unfortunately for Judge Carroll, it’s only a matter of time when he can no longer run and hide from the law or, if that doesn't work, the wrath of those patriotic Americans who will call him to legal account in an appropriate, peaceful way.

Revelations 6:16 says it more boldly: "And said to the mountains and rocks, Fall on us, and hide us from the face of him that sits on the throne, and from the wrath of the Lamb:"

Now why on God's green Earth would the Lamb of God have cause to wrath, or anger? And what could we infer about those who make a mockery out of justice in our courts and that saying about the warped judgement being whipped out of courts?

Was that John 2:15? Something about "Jesus made a whip from some ropes and chased them all out of the Temple-King James Bible (Cambridge Ed.)traders whom the covetous priests and rulers encouraged to make a market-place of its courts.." - huh? That's kind of interesting.

These traitors.. oh I mean traders where doing unholy things in places they ought naught be doing them, I guess, is a way to look at it.

So if a Judge in a Court of law basically over-rides the Constitution as the Supreme Law of the Land, that would be cause for the people to elect someone who would see to it that justice was restored to the Courts and the best way to do that would be to see to it that Judges who "winked" in the biggest case of United States elections fraud be impeached or undergo impeachment trials?

Seems to me a President who is in charge of the Executive Branch of Government could bring such Trials to Congress and an Attorney General.

Well, the bottom line is that Eric Holder isn't going to be the Attorney General forever and Barack Obama is indeed not going to be in the Office of the President forever, but these Judges have made decisions which really need to be given some due process.

If ever there was a demand made by a Judge for attention, I'm thinking the biggest fraud in United States history just might deserve that kind of attention in a few short years.

I only have one thing to say about that, "Good luck with that future investment you're making because I think that it would be an understatement to say, "there will be all hell to pay", from a future American President elected by the people. They may find themselves gift wrapped and sent to China as a large down payment on our debt.

There are many things I actually look up to China, as well as Mormons for: Frugality and Industry, are staples in their diets. The good people who cultivate this for their children are to be admired. On the flip side the gluttonous actions in Washington DC are often embarrassing to us when it comes to these principles that are sound and wise.

Of course $500 dollars a month to build apple computers, that includes overtime, may be half of what American's minimum wage jobs pay and maybe seen as a luxurious job in China for a million people but I'm pretty sure that's not minimum wage in America, and Mormons might not take the freedom of speech literally in their religious meetings if someone calls out the abbreviation of the Book Of Mormon or B.O.M. in their meetings backed up with evidence, but they are trying to improve these things as religious sentiment is expressed. I think my case 20 years ago was the last one that put someone away for that. Man did I ever 'LEARN' to appreciate the Constitution there! Sadly, it took losing my rights for me to pay attention, but I am now grateful for the experience. Its taken a long time for me to say that, and understand it.

I think my example of more time in prison then many murderers with the Constitution locked up as well, when it came to evidence, cementing a union of church and state,as well as my sincere apologies have sufficed to shut people up. I certainly do not want to defend any hypocrisy and when I'm wrong I admit it, which is what I'm wondering about all these judges betting on Barack Obama on the side of hypocrisy towards our Constitution and the absolute fraud of a "natural born citizen" Obama is? This obstruction of justice has taken our Nation and set it off balance and our debt is a symptom of the sickness.

As we struggle to find our balance, I am so proud of Americans who have cut up their credit cards, or have decided that insurmountable debt is a weight that is near to slavery and miserable, and that a pay-as-you-go-balance can afford a much healthier lifestyle of happiness. We as Americans desire this health and freedom which is accompanied with liberty for our future.

We have integrity and want to pay off our debts, but we cannot be shackled down by the intolerable glutton our Government has become made so by the decisions as comparable to the corruption of foreign metals in the purifying process of gold that have burned us and sold entire generations into bondage.

Let me take this time to wish you and yours a very Happy New Year!

Cody Robert Judy
A New Ride
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZDRTVakr7NI



Doritos- Has Justice been Jacked Women? 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tqbwN8wzEhg




http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9fNjSTFI7_I



If you'd like to help Cody in the fight at the United States Supreme Court please contribute here:http://www.codyjudy.us/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm


The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
Cody Robert Judy for President
Plaintiff/ SCOTUS Case No. JUDY v. OBAMA 12-5276
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODY JUDY
FEC REGISTERED  http://fec-candidates.findthedata.org/l/4426/Judy-Cody-Robert
Candidate ID P20003372
Committee ID C00501593

Petition for Rehearing under consideration:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/113046270/Judy-v-Obama-12-5276-Petition-for-Rehearing


Writ of Cert under consideration Judy v. Obama 12-5276
http://www.scribd.com/doc/100156244/Judy-v-Obama-Petition-for-Writ-of-Certiorari-Revision-per-U-S-Clerk-Case-Analyst-Appendix-Stamped-Orders-Included