Thursday, January 15, 2015


After my new song was finished, I mean recorded and all, the video up today, I was really moved by a story seen on Birther Report that was basically an interview with a veteran journalist Diana West as she appeared on Andrea Shea King's radio show and revealed some stunning details about her time as a syndicated columnist. "She noted how when she wrote for The Washington Examiner they refused to run news articles about any of the ongoing court cases challenging Obama's constitutional eligibility."

As soon as I read that I thought about a line in my song which has been written, "Our Views are censored by the Media Whore ,She won't cover you on the News Room Floor" and I thought Diana's story was certainly a testament of that to be true. What would or what will hundreds of Reporters of the Media say when and if they are Interviewed after Obama has left?

Today I've had a lot of thoughts on what is owed to the "Truth" and what is the reward? There is of course my own personal reflection of what the battle has been like over the last six years on McCain's as well as Obama's Eligibility fight and a book could be written on each one, but I do have to say one of the very hardest things has been even surviving as a political candidate when such things as what Ms. West and also what Ms.Sharyl Attkisson is saying about her 'Battle Royale with the Feds'“Unfortunately, the government doesn’t always provide truthful information,” the former CBS News correspondent told the Daily Beast this week. (1-9-15)

I've been thinking about this for awhile now and how 'key' the press is in 'getting the ball rolling for Candidates. It's almost impossible to think about 'bulk emailing everyone' in the Country on a personal level unless you have got some major computer clout. Much of the public used utilities very strictly limit a 'user' and even censor you if you emails start to press over fifty recipients, but as a candidate you have got to get your words out there for people to at least consider.

We are much closer to being able to do that with the Internet especially if someone is 'searching for you'. The sale is often not so much what a customer went out for, but what she was brought as an opportunity while there. Ever run to the store for one item and come back with ten things you needed? (smile) Well, that's in essence what I'm saying. You need to rally a core base that you appeal to that can get the ball rolling. How is that most easily done?

Again, it comes down to coverage by the MainStream Media.If a newspaper reporter will write a story about your campaign every person in the city of that newspaper now is armed with a name and perhaps some motivation to go digging a little for a platform. Most generally, Candidates for Office get somewhat of a 'fair shake' when it comes to a reporter asking about their platform in a local or state election especially if the Candidate has anything remotely interesting to write about that might be different from the other candidates.The problem is nearly all the Media is anti-birther which is nearly like saying anti-constitution. That's really strange with 'free speech' and 'free press' hanging on by a thread. I've been made fun of so much I decided to play a little humor back. If you don't get this you probably haven't been a Birther very long. (smile) The small print says as a rule of order for anti-birthers "we can't stand people who use more than four words in a sentence"


Now experience has taught me that most Candidates for Office, any office, are like little screaming devils running around screaming 'that's not Fair' if an opposing candidate get's any publicity or more publicity than they feel they should get. I learned that lesson very thoroughly in my very first federal election for Congress when the Daily Show with Jon Stewart came out to make a little parody about my running in U.S. Representative Race for Utah's First District in 2002. You should have seen all the little devils jumping up and down, stomping their feet and gnashing their teeth and that story wasn't all that 'flattering' to me. I was running as a low tiered Democrat and both the upper tier Democrats' and the Republicans were freaking out if I got five seconds of over-allotted time on a stump speech to Delegates and they really started breathing fire if a story was remotely flattering!

Candidate's for office have been called attention whores, but gosh that's what you need to get your message out. The tricks and the treats are all about getting elected and motivating people to actually do something as far as advocating or contributing to your campaign. I've certainly dealt with the 'negatives' of my running for Office, but after all of that people still have to say, "What are the positives?" What is Cody Robert Judy doing or advocating that even makes him think he's different than all of the other guys and so should be seriously considered for the Office?

Over the last thirty days, it is very rare that you don't see a story that has been written by a reporter about two or three of the people considering running for President featured on The Drudge Report. In fact its' actually kind of hard not to find a story about Hillary Clinton on there over the last thirty consecutive days and Jeb Bush and now Mitt Romney are running pretty close to that. Dr. Ben Carson, Sen. Ted Cruz, Gov. Christie, Sen. Marco Rubio, Rep. Rand Paul, Sen. Rick Santorum, and Sen Elizabeth Warren all have had stories there. I've never been a 'featured' in a story that made the Drudge Report. In fact if you put my name in the search engine of the Drudge Report you'll get a scolding that says 'Avoid using noisy words like FOR, Of,The, A , Not, An and so." That kind of puts what I'm saying in perspective.

The silencer that the Media has screwed on my barrel has been probably one of the top five most hurtful things to me personally and to my Campaigns that I can articulate. I just don't run for Office for 'me', I do it as a service towards the public good. That silencer wasn't because I had not "Done" anything but was in fact a silencer to what I was doing and the work I have been engaged in they have in fact 'agreed' or in some sort of a mean spirited coercivness towards not only me, but 'Truth' for the public, agreed to silence. The public has every right to be very upset, angry, and hurt about this silent treatment and while Diana West and Sharyl Attkisson have not threaded my name into the story, I definitely am in it maybe even more than they would credit.

Sometimes people don't understand what 100 hundred hours on a single web page means in formulating and articulating a platform that has essential and vital information for a Campaign and who bears the brunt of making that a product to vote for. I don't have a hundred people that I can assign a page to for a week for their best work and focus. The President of course has a lot of people available to assist and help in Cabinet positions, in Obama's case Czars. But what I'm getting to is generally the President steers the Country in a general direction and the details or minor decisions are handed down. Sometimes we hear criticism about a person who 'micro-manages' and everyone hates to work for because they feel they can't do anything without being told what to do.

Now the President's duties on the major list is in fact so important its' in the oath, " faithfully execute the Office of the President and to the best of my ability preserve,protect, and defend the U.S. Constitution". Of course we all know Obama really messed that up both figuratively and methodically in receiving and reciting the oath taken in as many days, but the point I'm trying to impress is generally the duties of the President are considered big general directions: Like, Let's go 'That way' and not 'This way'.

What does that have to do with me as compared to all the other Candidates or pre-Candidates for the Office of the President? As the President, or Candidates for President as we are talking about, steer in general directions they also have the eye or the highest perch for danger. For instance it is not out of the ordinary for a Candidate for President to have a position on the 'danger's of Russian Expansion' and the aggravations perhaps purposely orchestrated for intended result. That's kind of a big large foreign policy topic that could actually escalate into grave danger. I mean there is no question about that and I think every Presidential Candidate would agree they should have a position on that. Some might be the same, some might be different.

So, what is the Big Policy Issue substantially agreed upon by the actions and words of all the other Presidential Candidates that compromises our Country's national security placing all in grave danger? Does anyone think Obama has done any damage to our Country let's say going back over 25 scandals that White House veteran reporter Keith Koffler has described?

Of course,none of the Featured Top 10 Drudge Presidential Candidates have to my knowledge even acknowledged that there was a problem with Obama's not being qualified as a 'natural born Citizen' in public at their bully pulpit and I know for sure absolutely none of them have felt strongly enough about that oath they might take as President to take a stand against Obama in State or Federal Court. Now I really do feel that a lot of the reason for that on the Republican side was due to McCain's U.S. Sen. Res. 511 that literally every Republican U.S. Senator voted for accept McCain who abstained because it was about him. Of course that's kind of like not voting for yourself on the ballot, and if you can't vote for yourself I sure don't know why anyone else should have any confidence in you either.

On the surface it was harmless a non-binding U.S. Sen. Resolution but underneath it was the pit of hell Obama dug out from under the Republican Party that the rank and file had no courage to challenge as wrong. Of course there was only one person in the whole Nation of the United States running for President who was 'stupid', 'brave', or whatever adjective you decide to put in that spot describing my character to do just that. One of the biggest problems with being the only one,was a very fomented and almost rabid racist argument that the Major Main Stream Media Reporters assailed on potential candidates for challenging Obama. This was clear to everyone who had a dust-particle element in their head about running for President in their political future.

Normally you would think the Media would come down and interview me about these unique actions that actually held the 'Candidates' responsible for damages caused by being ineligible rather than a California Secretary of State or any other Secretary of State for that matter. To me the argument of holding a Secretary of State liable for a rogue candidate for President with the mafia as a party behind him was a little like holding your juvenile's teacher responsible for your child bringing home a failing grade. Why shouldn't we hold the child responsible for not doing their home-work? That is in a nut-shell what we have been fighting for years and years in the famed Birther Bunkers.

When you start gathering all of the evidence of Obama and what he has cost America so far is their any argument that is a BIG NUMBER and economically speaking there is just no way those who are in power now will ever be around to pay the debt they have placed on future generations?

I had a little different way of looking at the context of things which have passed when it came to a fellow facebook operative defending Mitt Romney as "a good man, whose helped a lot of people" running for President. If you just mathematically add up the people Obama has hurt economically, and realize Mitt Romney refused to support anyone's Court Action against Obama's ineligibility, or better yet initiate one as a "Candidate with Standing", (which many a Birther case has been dismissed because of the lack of "standing"),himself, you get the idea of holding Mitt Romney responsible for inaction and the massive cost that entailed.

Mitt Romney is really good with numbers. He's made money on cutting cost for businesses no one has thought about because he got into the details of pencils and staples that were being wasted. He is excellent at that, and he is an wonderful family man and he's done a lot for a lot of people, but the amount of people he hurt because of that one decision not to preserve the Constitution or defend it when he was the point man for the Republican Party has left a massive debt and a massive crushing burden on so many more people that he has hurt; that in a scale might be compared to helping all the people in one State and hurting everyone in 49 other States.

Mitt bears that responsibility and it was a choice he had every right, opportunity, and actually duty to make. That's a BIG policy or direction that being President holds one to and look what it's cost you and me and those who are not even born yet as future American Generations. Now to date, I don't think former Gov. Mitt Romney has really done that math but it exist as surely as Obama occupies the White House in the Office of the President and to discount that is truly an act of harm upon so many more looking to come into their parents life.

While no other candidate really has been put into that position of Standing other than Mitt Romney for the Republican Party, who was not ineligible themselves (like Sen. McCain who you wouldn't expect to bring up the subject due to the proprietary fact he was not born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents and thus got on his knees and begged his colleagues for U.S. Sen. Res. 511, that was kin in Congress to the one giving to him U.S. Citizenship at 11 months old as an immigrant as part of an amnesty act for those foreign born)Hillary Clinton does not share that comfort because she had every right and standing to object even as I did to Obama in Ballot Challenges and Law Suits asserting her Civil Rights as a candidate for President were being compromised.

Of course, most conservatives don't appreciate McCain now and would not argue that McCain's actions are as foreign as his birth. Indeed his own party brought sanctions upon Sen. McCain in Arizona because of his foreign drift. Hillary Clinton assuaged to be the original Birther beside Obama chose instead of preserving, protecting and defending the Constitution to blame the death of four very brave souls in Benghazi on the videotape and did an apology tour culminating in her utterance of her most famous words which might be immortalized in the engraving on her tombstone as "What difference does it make now!"

So, not only did S.O.S Clinton make the same choice as Mitt Romney in burying the unborn children in a massive amount of debt for generations to come, but she chose to infuriate and antagonize millions of Muslims against all the people she was sworn to protect at home with outright lies. I mean has ISIL had any better recruiter than S.O.S. Hillary Clinton? Yet all these big Democratic Party Donors are lining up to feed her Campaign a little more fuel to spew out on Americans? They really have to totally deny the fact that S.O.S. Clinton has done her best to kill them with her lies, and they want to contribute?. How many Major Networks have already declare radical Islam Jihadist the greatest terror threat the U.S. faces?

I do understand more and more the courage it takes to be a U.S. President and defy gravity at times or at least the crowd hooping and hollering against you that has a much narrower focus than the United States in the coming century and the preservation of freedom and liberty here for future generations. We are responsible for seeing to it the baton is passed forward. Those who do not fight for the U.S. Constitution in the eligibility requirements of the Office of the President are essentially opening or parting the red sea for enslavement and debt rather than leading the way into a new millennium of prosperity in freedom and liberty.

My new song is really dedicated to just normal people making a little contribution to the fight. We outnumber and surround all of the elected leaders and we can make a difference if everyone just gives a little. We shouldn't rely on PACs to fund entire campaigns. Many people contribute to their Churches in a charitable effort to help the cause of principle but much fewer view the political arena as actually effecting more people than the Congregation of their church. Without the freedoms and liberties of the Constitution churches lose their power to free speech and religious worship. Neglecting Campaigns in the political arena can be as harmful to a church in a charitable consideration as if you were paying to have someone burn the church down.

In the political arena, a little from a whole bunch can really make a difference and that is the theory that I've advanced in the title of my new song CONTRIBUTION REVOLUTION. So often a revolution is imagined as a blood scene on the battle field but it doesn't have to come to that here in the United States of America. We can have a CONTRIBUTION REVOLUTION and not have to fire a gun at our neighbor. This has always made much more sense to me and I hope it makes more sense to you.

The 2016 Campaign begins now. Please send your contributions and help with the ABC (American Birther Campaign) today and my election for President in 2016 and Join the 257 of us now on my Facebook Cody Robert Judy for U.S. President 2016 site.


CONTRIBUTION REVOLUTION is about supporting and contributing to what you love. We all Donate and Advocate what we believe one way or another. Sometimes, a contribution is noted as not-contributing. The lack of support of Government Elected Leaders in and for the Constitution is setting up a Contribution Revolution!
First Chorus :
Welcome, Welcome, Welcome Welcome
Welcome to the Revolution The Revolution, The Revolution

Thank you for your Contribution
You did nothing but set up my Revolution (Second Chorus)

Militarized Police The New Civil Army
Get Your hands up or your gonna be sorry.

Extremism in your Neo-Constitution
Make yo whipping boy for the evolution

Our Views are censored by the Media Whore
She won't cover you on the News Room Floor

The Frame Job Patriot seen as Narrow
Welcome to the age of the Bow and Arrow.

Repeat Chorus

You Jealous of the black man Doing what he can
Killing the spider on my plate
Shouldn't have been there he sealed his fate

Didn't give me no support Testifying your Offense in Court
Donate, Advocate, Yeah lend a hand
Giving to the cause for which you stand
For which you stand

Judy v. Obama is indeed in chambers and is set to be ruled upon shortly. I don’t know exactly when it was submitted for a decision as ripe by the Clerks and I don’t know how long it may be in chambers much like one doesn’t know how long it will take for a jury to reach a decision but we do know now for certain that the process of a decision is underway, that all arguments have been submitted and now are closed. The U.S. District Court Records submitted and a decision is now close at hand.
Cody Robert Judy

For those wishing to read the court action I have filed in Judy v. Obama filed in the Tenth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, Denver, CO. I invite you to here. I also would like to make an appeal to you for contributions which you can send to the address listed on the Court document to me if you'd like or you can now do that online at the web site now.

We need your help. Will you help us or are the outrageous lies your being told by your elected leaders okay for you and your children? If you won't defend your children and their future who will you defend?

The 2016 Campaign begins now. Please send your contributions and help with the ABC (American Birther Campaign) today and my election for President in 2016 and Join the 257 of us now on my Facebook Cody Robert Judy for U.S. President 2016 site.

Cody Robert Judy for President 2016
3031 So. Ogden Ave. Suite #2
Ogden, Utah 84401

Thank you
Cody Robert Judy
Candidate for United States President 2016

The Commercial is simply called "America"


No comments:

Post a Comment