Monday, June 22, 2015
BREAKING NEWS: SUPREME COURT "ORDERS"- JUDY v. OBAMA NOT DEAD!
FEATURED : BIRTHER REPORT ; THE POST & EMAIL
BREAKING NEWS: SUPREME COURT ORDERS- JUDY v. OBAMA NOT DEAD-LISTED!
Todays' U.S. SUPREME COURT 'ORDERS' list might be the UNIVERSE SHATTERING EVIDENCE heard around the world! Today a Case under consideration by the United States Supreme Court 'failed' the death grip of what is called the 'Dead-List' of the United States Supreme Court. It's never happened before with a Case that dealt with the Eligibility Questions presented by Mr. Judy a Candidate for President in '08 and '12 and now 2016 asserting Campaign Damages for the unanswered Obama ineligibility question when it comes to the United States Constitution's demand for a 'natural born Citizen'.
[UPDATE 11pm: We wanted to report to you 8 contributions today! FUND RAISING - I'm happy to Report today 8 Contributions. You know what I love about this is they are from all over this great Country- 2 from Florida ; 2 From North Carolina - 2 from California - 1 from Texas - and 1 from Virginia ! Thank you all so much for a total of $298.00! That's a FILING FEE in SCOTUS! Let's go and get your State on the Board! We have had over 1,500 view this post so far today if each had donated $1 we'd be there with the printing cost. Please help us with your change! Safe and Secure Paypal Link here ]
Speculation and Interest has been rising in the Judy v. Obama 14-9396 Case across the Nation with a range of predictions. Top Anti-Birther's have chimed in with scathing comments and even a 'prophetic post' roundly and confidently written by Dr. Conspiracy leader and chief of Obamaconspiracy.org that he comped was set to self publish at Midnight before the ORDERS list appeared at the SCOTUS web site, entitled FUTURE NEWS: Supreme Court Rejects Judy plea. One could almost see the beads of sweat appear as the confusion when Judy's case was not seen on the "Dismissed" side of the Orders List and instead landed on the "PENDING ORDERS" list.
Of course a glorious round of applause went up on the Judy side and near disbelief also having suffered so many defeats over the last six years in 15 Actions held in the lower Judicial Courts as well a U.S. Supreme Court 12-5276 Case that originated from a State Supreme Court Case Decision in Georgia rather than a Federal Rights and Congressional Act Violation the present action represents in origin. Could that be the difference?
Presidential Candidate Cody Robert Judy (CRJ) said "Yes", that could be the difference. He postulated, "In many ways the United States Supreme Court allows for what is called a 'ripening' of Cases before deciding to weigh in on them. That entails a real exhaustion of State Remedies that quite readily exhaust petitioners, sometimes completely out of continuing on."
Since the beginning of Obama's term in Office most all the Cases have been 'dismissed' based on a lack of standing which Obama's attorneys are on record of stating, "The Petitioner(s) were not a Presidential Candidate" and that has roundly been the way that Obama has not been called into Court to defend the allegations of his not being a 'natural born Citizen' qualified by the Constitution's demands. The demand of 'natural born Citizen' for President and Vice President similar to the higher age demanded also, is unique from those lower offices of U.S. Representative and U.S. Senator defined by the Constitution as 'Citizen'.
Judy said, "Citizen was used for the Office of the President, but it was specifically defined as limited only to those who were such at the time of the Adoption of the Constitution.", lending credence to the unique difference between the 'natural born Citizen' and the 'Citizen' qualification variation between the Offices. So what is the difference?
The Presidential Candidate said, "The difference is the 'natural born Citizen' definition is not listed under the naturalization terms cited in Title 8 Aliens and Nationals which includes all kinds and types of varied accomplishments towards defining American Citizenship, but the one that is not defined is the only one the U.S. Supreme Court has also defined in the Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1875) case cited in his Case as precedent, [it was never doubted those who were born in the Country to Citizen Parents are natural born Citizens] meaning Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents. I've never thought the Office of the President was an office we should fool around with and have doubts about who was in it."
Cody Robert Judy's Campaigns for President in the fight to defend the Constitution didn't begin with Obama's ineligibility question, they actually begin with a Federal Court Case against Sen. John McCain and his ineligibility that was filed just days before the Republicans nominated him as their nominee in 2008. In Judy v. McCain many have supposed McCain's military duty exempted him from the qualification of 'natural born Citizen' [Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents], but Judy said, that's as foolish as thinking those who have become new immigrant Citizens in this Country could not be summoned up for a draft in the military. They could be called upon to fight for this new Country of theirs, but still not be qualified to be President. The military is sworn to defend the Constitution not over-throw it. Those military men and women have a duty towards the Constitution first, not second and those who do not meet the 'age' requirements of the Offices defined in the Constitution also still have to fight for the Constitution in which they are not allowed to hold office because of being to young, but still old enough to fight."
The reference comes at the Constitution's varying demands that no one serve as a U.S. Representative until having attained to the age of 25: That no one serve as a U.S. Senator until having attained the age of 30: and that no one serve in the Office of the President until attaining to the age of 35. Judy said, "If you want to call that discrimination, your good conscience can consider the wisdom exist in being able to do just that, as our Founders and Framers pondered would best suit and ascertain the Country's survival."
Judy v. Obama 14-9396 was placed on the "pending orders" list because Judy did not meet the standard for 'informa pauperis'. However, there was some confusion about it at first. If you look at the PDF filing of the Court Orders you'll see just below Judy's case, in a specific order(s) spelling out just that description in Cases 14-8082 and 14-9797 which state clearly, "The Motions to proceed informa pauperis are denied"
In Case 14-8082 just above Judy v. Obama is states for that case: "The Motions of Petitioners for reconsideration of orders denying leave to proceed informa pauperis are denied"
Judy v. Obama 14-9396 is then listed with no 'specifications' of pending orders.
Next comes the Case 14-9797 'The leave to proceed informa pauperis by the petitioners is denied..'
There are four other cases also listed with no specific 'ORDER' detailed next to their cases, leaving us really not knowing what the orders are about for sure, or what they might include although all four have had informa pauperis rulings on them and they are listed on their docket reports already.
Mr. Judy said regarding his Case, "Well, I did file a Motion for leave to file my petition 'informa pauperis' in Judy v. Obama 12-5276, 2012 and my case or Writ of Certiorari Petition was just "Denied" and later I filed for a Review and that was Denied also, verifying that Informa Pauperis standing was granted but the Case was Denied Cert. No where on that Docket do you see a 'disposition of the multiple Motions' I filed in that Case either. This tells us the Court doesn't necessarily feel the need to formally rule on Motions before the Court, or they do so and do not print it on the Docket, as the Case in 2012 is Evidence of.
"While it does seem very strange to me, especially given the "Motions of Leave to Proceed informa pauperis" the Federal District Case in Utah Granted, as well the "Motion of Leave to Proceed informa pauperis" being granted in the Denver Tenth Circuit Court granted to be denied my Motion for Leave by the U.S. Supreme Court, especially given that means filing cost and a printing cost of several thousand dollars for about 45 copies. There's no way I could pay that and I've only received about $280 dollars worth of contributions which went for printing and mailing what I did send to the Court which is not covered by an informa pauperis even if it was granted. I still had to make 11 copies of the book that was 43 pages long and send 11 copies to the Court as well serve the Respondent(s) copies, and the Government copies because of the Acts of Congress being included. Now there asking it be reprinted and sent to them with the forty copies. While I understand myself that's hard, its probably much harder for the Court to think we couldn't raise enough money to file the Case and pay the filing fees and printing cost. My own personal circumstances are far worse now then they were in 2012 when my Inform Pauperis was granted and I just didn't expect this at all. Thus I'm lead to believe something else is up."
"The next question is "Do I have any other 'pending Motions' before the Court besides the Informa Pauperis Motion the Court could possibly be considering? The answer to that question is "Yes" and that is detailed very clearly here and here. The synonymous of that ORDER is that the Government and Obama have failed to even file a 'token' response that would be considered valid by the Court. Usually a Waiver of Response is filed, and though the Docket has a Waiver listed, I pointed out to the Court it is not signed by the Solicitor General and literally could have been sent to them by Russian President Putin for all we know."
OTHER POINTS ADDRESSED UNDER PENDING ORDERS
Is there any evidence that points to Cases listed under the "PENDING ORDERS list of Cases in the U.S. Supreme Court as to pending motions that don't have anything to do with informa pauperis, that are listed right along side the Judy v. Obama case?
The answer to that question is "Yes". The evidence shows us in the 14M129 - "The Motion to direct the clerk to file a motion of certiorari out of time under rule 14.5 is denied." Another one- 14-990 says, "The motion of petitioners to dispense with printing the joint appendix is granted."
For all the implications to consider the most simple and basic one is that the Court is not to happy about Obama and the Government failing to file any complimentary and courteous response and while understanding the Court's ability to grant Orders without signature(s)of the Justices, it is not one necessarily afforded by the Respondent in a case like this. All of the other Cases considered indeed did have their Motions for Informa Pauperis 'denied' much earlier on in their Cases, so that a Reconsideration could be filed on that Motion at least. Many did that and it was in before their conference date.
There is little doubt that the resulting Action by the Court not to list Judy's Case as 'Dismissed', is one also GRANTING Oxygen to the Case. It has survived and has not been dismissed in the U.S. Supreme Court unlike any other Birther Case. It was not been 'dead-listed' defying the prophets-of-doom or spec-u-lators who have fiercely strove against the evidence presented to the Court. If the speculators were honest they also would include the possibilities that a RESPONSE or BIO BRIEF IN OPPOSITION is indeed within consideration of the Court now just as easily, as well as a complete reversal and GRANT of the Case as a win for Judy within the powers of the Court under De Novo.
USA TODAY, CNN, and even the Washington Post have printed parse tort against Presidential Candidate Donald Trump June 17th since he entered the race reminding everyone that the "Birther Issue" is one of embarrassment presumed upon a Candidate rather than one of honor and in all candor Obama has never had to defend his eligibility in a Court of Law preferring the easy wins of the public court with the winds of the media in his favor. Of course the bully pulpit of the Media doesn't often consider the charge of the Constitution as solemnly as the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court.
The Media is on record as often getting it wrong even in deciphering the Court's Opinions. "They, Main Stream Media, consistently seek to dis-honored the Presidency of the United States by stating Obama was a 'Citizen'. Indeed you can be a Citizen and still not qualify for the Office of the President;", Judy continued, "rather than the very clear higher standard of "natural born Citizen' demanded for the Office of the President. That should be clarified. To print and argue as if the two terms invoke no difference in qualification is a false narrative. "That is to state that the Constitution's demands for the Office of the President a delirious infestation of terms completely absent those for Representatives and Senators, and our Founders and Framers in the notable distinctions that are made, were also delusional or in a stage of absent mindedness.", Judy said, "Of course this is along the lines of stating Hillary Clinton has lost her mind because she forgot a Reporters name twice in the same interview. While that did happen, its doubtful in the Constitutional Convention of ratification there were not many there to catch any mistake so arbitrarily assumed and thus the implication is a very false narrative."
Fox News however did come out June 20th with a comparison reported by Sharon Rondeau Chief Editor of the Post & Email (Jun. 20, 2015) — [On his new 10:00 p.m. EDT Fox News show bearing his name, Greg Gutfeld compared the background documentation of Rachel Dolezal, a white woman who has represented herself as a black person for an unknown number of years, to the dearth of documentation available on Barack Hussein Obama.] [Dolezal was serving as head of the Spokane, WA NAACP (National Association for the Advancement of Colored People) until her white parents revealed that their daughter has no black ancestry.][At approximately 10:08, Gutfeld said to his guest (paraphrased), “Obama has less documentation than she (Dolezal) does.”[in 2008, Obama ran for president without having made public his college transcripts, grades, school and birth records, college theses, work history, Illinois State Senate and U.S. Senate voting history. In December 2007, MSNBC commentator Chris Matthews said on air that Obama was “born in Indonesia” but did not question Obama’s constitutional eligibility to seek the presidency.]
Read more on that story at BIRTHER REPORT and The Post & Email.
THE SCRIPT IN THE PLAY OF ANTI-BIRTHERS
There is no doubt of the story from anti-birthers today scanning furiously for Judy v. Obama 14-9396 to be under the DISMISSED LIST of the U.S. Supreme Court, and the sheer panic and confusion that set in when it was not found after it has been prophesied to be there by their Doctor and was M.I.A. To be DISMISSED would have been sweet to them, to be given another MONTH to raise money, raise awareness, and utilize more time is something they are no doubt wishing the Court would not have done. They certainly wish the SCOTUS had just simply killed the Case. Why oh Why didn't they just kill it?
CRJ noted sincerely, "You know the Motion for Informa Pauperis is the factor in this, which is hard for me to believe living below the poverty level as I am, people who believe in this Case really need to understand that there is no way I can pay the filing fees and additional printing cost of which would be demanded by the Court for 48 booklet forms. This 43 pages and the cost is about $1,588.40 here. The public relations of this case has handicapped me even to a real detriment of paying my own bills. People have just got to understand, I cannot do this alone and their assistance and help is needed. I know there is a lot of people interested, but it just seems like no one is willing to give up a big gulp and a candy bar for this important case surrounding our Constitution."
Cody added he didn't really think that the informa pauperis was all the this was about. That he thought this was much more about the Justices being given more time to ponder the implications and ramifications of the Case in general. "Listen, the same dog-gone Informa Pauperous was granted by two lower Court this year and in fact the U.S. Supreme Court in 2012. If this was really about 'frivolousness' the Court would simply have axed it and pushed the case out not given it more oxygen. I'm not to proud to ask anyone for help. I even asked Donald Trump today for help.", Cody said, "on my Twitter Account. If Mr. Trump has the interest of the Country in mind, what's two grand of his 9 billion for a U.S. Supreme Court case. If he did this himself it would cost him a million to get there? This is much more economical."
"Its really a disturbing and unethical thought that people would want a Candidate for President to finance himself to the White House or worse to the U.S. Supreme Court in an understanding that either one of those could actually be purchased for money. If that were the case, then what Mr. Trump said is true, "The American Dream is dead.". I bristled at that, because I still believe in Justice. While I have very little money, and my net worth is atrociously below Mr. Trumps 9 Billion, our Country, God Bless it, has provided a way to seek Justice without price for those who would be the subjects of injustice rather then the Citizens of Justice for All".
"Our Country is a great place of HOPE in opportunity for Justice, where in many other Countries that Justice for All idea, is simply an impossibility no if's and's or but's. There is no way what I have done is possible in any other Country but that it would be derailed and knocked off very quickly. Of course I have experienced that in many Courts here, even the U.S. Supreme Court in 2012 as I mentioned earlier. It is not for me to say that those other Courts also may have acted in a way that gave more substance to past actions paid for, then to the evidence presented on Record reflecting current circumstances petitioning for Justice.
"I have stated before, one of the Main Reasons for filing a Petition for a Writ of Cert in the U.S. Supreme Court is because of the political interference presented by Judges and Justices of the Lower Courts having to run for election where the U.S. Supreme Court Justices have a life tenure in their seats. The U.S. Senate Seats are for a six (6) year term so that they can also give more weight to influence corrections based on the fact they don't have an election every two (2) years like Representatives do; which might cause them to be more rash about pushing through things unconstitutional. Imagine the ability for the U.S. Supreme Court Justices with a life (life term in years) seat?
"They have the ability to consciously look at the distant future of the United States from a very large BEY WINDOW. We hope the view is never tainted, corrupted with money, or favor accept to that of "Justice". Their seats are worth much more than 9 Billion Dollars when you start to think of the net worth of countless generations affected by their decisions, that's a 'no-brainer'. Our Country is certainly bigger then any one man, and our future pegged on Justice assures many more prosperity, safety, and security than the stability of single ego maniac(s) who thinks the qualifications of the Constitution does not apply to them.
Now we have got to CELEBRATE this very big news! We have not been dismissed! That has NEVER happened before in any birther Case! Never has a BIRTHER CASE that I am aware of survived past the CONFERENCE date and Orders of the Court thereafter. We are making HISTORY here! PLEASE HELP US TODAY!
Please join us! We have been given new oxygen in a very smoky and polluted arena of doubt, cynicism, and cryptic apathy. Who can say the Prayers of this Nation are not heard? Not to be on the 'DISMISSED LIST' of the U.S. Supreme Court after Conference was certainly my prayer, and it has been answered along with the mighty prayers of everyone out there and I know they are not a few people. Praise God and thank you for your Prayers everyone.
We might find one day we are dead, but TODAY is NOT THAT DAY!!! SPREAD THE WORD!!! Please help us raise the money today as the Petition must be in the Court by July 13th, 2015! That means we only have a couple of weeks to print it and get the copies in with the filing fees of $300 paid. You can contribute towards this goal in my very safe and secure paypal account here.
Cody Robert Judy
The Cody Robert Judy for President Camp 2016
Quick Reminder Cody's interview with Mike Volin coming up TONIGHT at WOBC Radio so tune in! Tune in here: -
HOUSE KEEPING NOTE:
Cody Robert Judy's FB page has filled up with 5,000 so we would ask you to join the new and growing list of supporters on FB here! Pass it on!
We hope you will not spare your Contribution today in the Res-TOUR-Ation of our NATION and support Cody Robert Judy for U.S. President today.
*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION
1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin
The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.
Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.
Thank you to everyone who is and has contributed just a little here and just a little there, for we are working very hard in using the little that we do have as efficiently and proficiently as it comes in, as I'm sure everyone would agree. Please consider a contribution
Let's make it Official and support a Qualified Candidate whose has dedicated his time and talent to taking a stand for America. Let's raise a million dollars and give you the right to say, "I'm not an Idiot, I'm a Patriot!".
INSPIRING - I believe in You