BREAKING REPORT: JUSTICE AND THE PRESIDENT
BREAKING REPORT: JUSTICE AND THE PRESIDENT-
The JUNE 18TH CONFERENCE THAT WE WON! JUDY v. OBAMA 14-9396 - SUPPORT GROWS 250,000!
The Play-by-Play call from the Announcer's Stand
The task seemed simple at first "Explain What's Happening" to me? She was at a golf match so grossly involved with all the intricacies of the match at first she thought it would be easy to tell her husband who had never seen a match. She pondered it two seconds and realized he would never understand without the time she had put in. We heard it again, "Explain What's Happening?" This time from someone who had never seen a football game asking a coach in an NFL Playoff Game. All of a sudden the task was daunting where time and word-space limits as well as attention span all came into effect. Americans had become so engrossed with instant satisfaction they no longer cared for details unless it was a subject they themselves specialized in, but they really liked slow motion!
Such is the case with me and trying to explain to so many what is happening now in Judy v. Obama 14-9396 and the implications of everything in a combined experience of the last 6.5 years. Of course I am not a professional or licensed attorney or Mechanic and we all know sometimes they have been known to take advantage of you when you were so uninformed on a subject that you just had to write a blank check. That's kind of what's happened in our Government to; politicians placed in a comfy position of intelligence are gaining that unfavorable rating from the pubic that started out with a favorable trust.
Sometimes it is very hard to keep up on a Case when so much is happening. I really applaud anyone who is paying attention to this now. Can you imagine the people who haven't read a single post yet and trying to explain this to them? You can understand how easily our Constitution has slipped out of the lime-light and into the closed chambers of the Justices and Officers of the Government. It becomes a bigger deal when those rights you simply thought would always be there suddenly are not and you find yourself a subject rather than a Citizen. All of a sudden it is a huge deal!
This has been my experience and I know how hard that is now. Within the context of the latest CONFERENCE of the United States Supreme Court that happened June 18th, 2015 let's take a look at some very basic things many antagonist are failing to mention in their comments in an effort to discourage your support and hope. I like to bring a big picture to the party and point out details they are missing and then let you begin to enjoy the big picture as I do to.
The June 18th CONFERENCE that we WON!
What? How can you say you WON? The June 18th Conference was kinda of like a finish line because it represented a GOAL of sorts people predicted you would not get past. In fact they were so sure you would not get past it, they placed all kinds of bets against you and told all their friends there's no way he will get past the June 18th Conference!
So, what does it mean when we got past the June 18th Conference? It means we won and its glorious! The losers are mumbling and grumbling with excuses that you usually here from losers none of which change the results. Judy v. Obama 14-9396 has done something no other Birther Case in the history of Obama has done. It got past the first Conference date without suffering a death on the Dismissed List.
Now, are there more games to play and finish lines to cross. Yes there are, and are there chances that we could win and lose at ever juncture which is kind of like the regular games of a Season Play hoping you get to the Playoffs and Superbowl- Yes.
HOW DO YOU EXPLAIN THAT WIN?
Well, the U.S. Supreme Court placed me on a "Pending Motions List". That means there are Motions before the Court PENDING that haven't been adjudicated, but that's better than having them adjudicated and being turned out on the Dismissed List of course which was the experience of some 165 of the 177 cases the Court took a look at June 18th. That placed us in the top 12 which was just thrilling, because just think about it. 165 Cases and the people involved in them were handed the consolation award of their "Case Number" and patted on the back and sent home probably never to come back.
CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE WIN
The circumstances of being put on a PENDING MOTIONS LIST can be both 'tactical' and 'necessary'. Let me explain. In my Case the Motion for Informa Pauperis or the Motion to Proceed without Cost due to my not having enough money to pay for the Court Filing Fee and the Printing of 45-48 Booklets of a 43 Page document that is about like printing the Constitution Pamphlet up could very well have been done BEFORE the June 18th Conference. Let's not forget my Case was first initiated in the Court on March 30th, as you can see!
With ALL of April, and ALL of May, and 18 Days of June, which makes up the 1st trimester of a baby, are we really to assume the Court could not depose a single Motion in the Case? Of course the court could. Usually, a informa pauperis proceeding is the very first thing that is looked at by a Justice or Judge, not the last thing. Another fact, when filing it it must be stapled on the FRONT of the Writ of Certiorari Petition by Court INSTRUCTIONS. So, its impossible to miss stapled on the front of the 11 Copies provided to the Court that I still had to finance myself to get printed up and mailed as well serve the Respondent(s)copies. I figure quite easily I've already got $200 in materials and cost right there.
We know the Court can depose a Motion in a day, so to wait until June 18th, the Day of the Conference after it sits there for 78 Days, is it more likely that the denial was a "Tactic" or a "Necessary"? The answer of course is "Tactic". What are the pros and cons of the 'tactic' that make it useful?
The biggest one quite frankly is it buys more time for the Court to think about, discuss, and research the ramifications of the Case itself without tipping their hand one way or the other officially. Of course it places a burden upon me, but one that can be finagled either by Requesting another Review of the Motion, or buy simply paying the fees.
There were many other Cases that were heard June 18th that had their Motions of Informa Pauperis all taken care of. They had been denied and actually still had enough time to get a 2nd Review on the Motion and had time to get that denied. This of course, lends credence to what I'm saying as far as it being 'Tactical' for the Court.
A tactical play also means you have business with those Justices, and its higher than likely more than one is on in the private discussions. This of course means, "You got game"- They are interested! Of course in a Case that decides the right of every American to at least vote for an eligible Candidate for the Office, to presume they wouldn't be interested would be pretty dog-gone cold on the preservation of the Republic for which we stand.
Is there anything else that suggest 'tactic' rather than 'necessity - or clerical error'? Why yes there is. The same Court approved the same Motion in 2012 with very little variation, accept my son being 3 years older and my car having odometer having 247,000 miles on it instead of 200,000. I don't think the cost of living has gone down over the last 3 years and my income most certainly hasn't reflected any gains over Obama's time in the White House. My networth has stagnated and I've just scraped by very meagerly and humbly. While Obama has afforded many vacations, I have had 0. My golf has been cut way back. I think I've managed 10 rounds in the last 3 years. Things have been tough, but I haven't had any assistance federally as far as food or housing, though I certainly would have qualified if I'd gone in and asked.
That's the kind of information that the Court has in front of it and to deny my Motion after granting it two years ago, just doesn't make any sense at all. Now maybe they expect a Candidate for President to be rich? I don't think that is on the Qualifications in the Constitution. Maybe they expect supporters to contribute and make the Campaign rich? After having so many losses, peoples confidence is wearing thin and it wasn't as if I had won an elected office before and had a network of support that was anything but social.
Of course that eliminates special interest, lobbyist, and puts me in the same category as Donald Trump mostly self financing my Campaigns in time and talent. I told the story before, but I did the same thing with the house I built in California. Built the entire thing myself with the assistance of others perhaps 3 days during the entire project. The bank came in and said, "Yes! You have a equity, about 50% of the worth." It was a lot of hard hard work and that's what's been done in my Campaigns. Of course, a net-worth is not required in the Constitution for the Office of the Presidency and a "serious Candidate" might be defined by actually preserving, protecting, and defending the Constitution instead of building skyscrapers or being a Senator or Governor. That's what I've been doing and if Justice is to have her perfect way, Justice might be the biggest attraction of the Nation in the interest of a Candidate for President. One who actually had experience with doing what the President's job is as its defined in the Oath of the President.
The Justices of course have to let justice happen, but I've worked like a dog in doing the job in actions. If Justice appreciates that of course I feel I have something of great value. I've actually predicted somethings, one of them being that my Campaign Chest outpaces any other Candidate in the Presidential Arena up to this point, but its on condition of Justice having her perfect way. If justice doesn't get her perfect way of course corruption has her day and injustice proceeds.
We could quite easily say it was "injustice" that granted the Motion in the same Court 3 years ago but denied it this year. We might say it was "injustice" that the Federal District Court granted the Motion of Informa Pauperis and so did the Circuit Court, yet, "injustice" somehow crept into the Court at the U.S. Supreme Court and denied that same Motion not 60 days later when my income and net-worth certainly didn't change.
All of these circumstances point me much more in the direction of "Tactical" delay of game "for the Justices to conference" than it tells me out of necessity the Courts actions were left without option and the circumstances could not have been different based on timing and normal Court procedure. I think explaining this as I have you should be able to see that also?
THE CLARITY OF THE ACTION
The other question is: Are their any other Motions that the Court might have placed me in the holding pen for? The answer to that question also; Yes, there is. But that Motion has not been registered on the Docket, so only the court can see it although I've provided to you in content as well as proof they received it to show you specifically there are things that the Court considers and Ponders that are not made available on the Docket: here.
Now to say the court doesn't entertain Motions, we know is just not true and denies the facts. What I have been trying to show you is that I think we have a very good chance here! We flat out passed the first test and I really believe with a surge of public support, and that means your assistance, help, support, passing it on, all comes into play here. You are like the Home-Court advantage to me, so let's get your cheer on!
Your support is being seen and felt. We picked up on FACEBOOK to my personal page of 5,000 being full and my Cody Robert Judy for President 2016 FB Page zooming up to now over 400 just the last couple of days! I just checked the stats on the Views here and you've done it again we are up to breaking the Quarter OF A MILLION views! That's terrific! Keep on, keeping on is what my Dad used to say and its good advice. Please help us if you can with any amount you can part with. I was thrilled to get $10, $20,$25, $35, and even a $100 dollar contributions yesterday that was the biggest day I've ever seen for a total of $298.00.
UPDATE: We thank you for Contributions received from FL.,N.C.,CA.,TX.,VA. and OR.! Updated "Change" Picture:
That is just wonderful. I was thrilled for the $10 dollar contribution because it told me she had faith that her contribution would count in the sum for a good Cause. Feeling like you matter, and you count, is just about the most awesome feeling you can have! You guys have inspired me soooo much. Thank you! I thought about the commercial you see at the bottom of the page, and thought about the title of it and you Inspiring Me. It fit so perfect.
Save and Secure Paypal Account here for your Contribution for your help with the ABC Campaign- That's the American Birther Campaign for Cody Robert Judy and your help and change today is badly needed for our SCOTUS Case!
Cody Robert Judy
The Cody Robert Judy for President Camp 2016
Quick Reminder Cody's interview with Mike Volin is up on Demand at WOBC Radio so tune in when you'd like! Tune in here: -
HOUSE KEEPING NOTE:
Cody Robert Judy's FB page has filled up with 5,000 so we would ask you to join the new and growing list of supporters on FB here! Pass it on!
We hope you will not spare your Contribution today in the Res-TOUR-Ation of our NATION and support Cody Robert Judy for U.S. President today.
*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION
1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin
The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.
Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.
Thank you to everyone who is and has contributed just a little here and just a little there, for we are working very hard in using the little that we do have as efficiently and proficiently as it comes in, as I'm sure everyone would agree. Please consider a contribution
Let's make it Official and support a Qualified Candidate whose has dedicated his time and talent to taking a stand for America. Let's raise a million dollars and give you the right to say, "I'm not an Idiot, I'm a Patriot!".
INSPIRING - I believe in You