BREAKING NEWS:
FEATURED EDITORIAL: The Post & Email
SPECIAL REPORT
#SCOTUS The COURT WITHIN THE COURT
Judges Recused in OBAMA's INELIGIBLE Case?
What may come down to the most important APPLICATION filed in the United States Supreme Court History the Court received today the reason they cannot accept an unqualified person in the Office of the President. "Without a qualified President under the United States Constitution's demand, in Obama's case for a 'natural born Citizen' ie., 'Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents', the People's Vote dismisses the U.S. Supreme Court's Jurisdiction under the U.S. Constitution. It's one or the other", said Petitioner and Candidate for President Cody Robert Judy.
If you have only just begin to watch or tune-in-to the longest lasting Case challenging Obama's eligibility under the United States Constitution, The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for President has a Special Feature for you. We have prepared a 60 Second Video for you to catch up on what has happened thus far.
NEW FILING -RECOGNIZED IN COURT TODAY
The new document delivered in the Court today with USPS Tracking No. EK 559361263 US , is entitled 'APPLICATION FOR STAY ON DENIAL PENDING FULL REVIEW ON THE RECUSAL OF JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT and KAGAN FROM PROCEEDINGS'
The Document is here on SCRIBD and following it I will discuss some of the 'Why's' of its importance if you care to stick around after reading it.
Document Found also embedded at the End of this Post. Delivery Noticed by By: J KOUROS // WASHINGTON, DC 20543 // 11:04 am
WHY WAS THIS DOCUMENT FILED
The obvious reason that Obama has nominated Justice Sotomayor and Justice Kagan may seem the obvious reasons to all, so they real reasons have more to do with the 'hostile judgments' that have been received by Justice Sotomayor's own hand which have lent the credibility to the APPLICATION.
In other words, I haven't just 'supposed' from the get-go that a simple 'nomination', much different by-the-way and should not be confused with the word 'appointment'. Obama did not 'appoint' Justice Sotomayor or Justice Kagan. The were 'nominated' and then received their confirmations from the Congress.
Now I have left it to Justice Sotomayor to reveal or implicate the magnitude of impact that has and by her own judgments implicate the reasons Justice Kagan should also be considered in the RECUSAL also. We already know the Justice Sotomayor has refused to recuse herself on this matter as she has been the one that issued a judgement on the APPLICATION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME.
Justice Sotomayor has in my opinion 'Denied' something the extension of time request in a hostile act towards justice. It just doesn't make sense to anyone. The Court had set a September 28th 2nd Conference and the APPLICATION simply made a more formal path towards that.
At times a Court will assign "Forma Pauperis" (IFP) motions to a Magistrate Judge. This is to say a Jr. under them. While I do not know the Judge who 'Denied' my forma pauperis status, in the U.S. Supreme Court, we do know Justice Sotomayor is in charge of motions and applications coming out of the Tenth Circuit/Utah Division and that my forma pauperis status was 'confirmed' by both the Tenth Circuit and Utah District Court. In the latter it was indeed a Magistrate Judge and not the Judge of the Case that granted my forma pauperis status.
So we do know that under Justice Sotomayor, what has been relatively a simply admission into the Lower Circuit and District Courts by the lack of funds presented to the Court in a quite lengthy 5 page report that includes things as intricate as 'clothing allowances', 'mileage on your car', down to your utilities and food budget , as well as the U.S. Supreme Court in 2012 in case 12-5276 which also granted my forma pauperis status with no problem and my financial status not getting better through the last three years but rather worse, that Justice Sotomayor has ruled in a way that would be seen as hostile towards the poor, and hostile towards justice.
We could surmise differently by the Court's Scheduling a September 28th hearing after I submitted a Motion for Reconsideration and Review on my IFP status, however, the DENIAL on the 25A15 Application for a Time Extension that is very elemental as a request for the Court really stacks the deck about an un-hostile judicial environment.
It rather comes down to understanding that if I was a beggar on the streets about to die of thirst without a drink of water and Justice Sotomayor was passing with a six pack of water, she would let me die rather then give me one. I have allowed her to make that very clear to me before moving for a Recusal, and why would I take another chance with Kagan in the room understanding the conditions of Sotomayor and Kagan are similar? I just couldn't in all fairness myself.
It is impossible to notice that no Supreme Court Justice can make it to the Confirmation Hearings of the Congress without a 'Nomination' by a qualified President. While it may be token for the President it is still vitally important and if the Court were to find in my Case damages were properly actuate undertaking the Case De Novo, which it can and which has been requested, there would indeed have to be 'further proceedings' in the Cases of consideration which might come in the form of an Act of Congress also then signed by a qualified President.
For all those people out there who consider Obama a friend, I say to them, you can continue to be his friend, but in considering the actions required by our Constitution, are you willing to give up every right you have under the Constitution's powers based on friendship? We are not considering Obama as a friend, we are considering him in these deliberations as a unqualified person in the Office of the President.
In other words, you can still have a friend after he is kicked out of the Office of the President, nothing changes, but you simply cannot afford sacrificing any one of the Constitutional Rights we have under the umbrella. Shall we discuss some of those rights?
Well, just recently the Supreme Court ruled that same-sex marriage was a guaranteed right under the 14th Amendment. If there is no Constitution there certainly is no 14th Amendment.
The Court also ruled recently that you as a private citizen have the right to bear arms under the 2nd Amendment. If there is no Constitution there is no 2nd Amendment.
Here's a list of Cases the Supreme Court has ruled upon that allow free religion, free speech, a free press, and freedom to assemble under the First Amendment. How many of you enjoy rights under the 1st Amendment and are willing to sacrifice those because Obama's your friend?
The point is those apposed to my action in Court actually are opposing their own rights under the Constitution of the United States and the Justices of the Supreme Court opposed to my Case are apposing their own tenure. We can see how important the Constitution is on both sides of the isle liberal and conservative and to secure your rights, those rights, you simply must have a Constitution and a qualified person in the Office of the President.
I need your help in passing this on to your neighbors so everyone gets an understanding of what is happening and can thus support or pass on it. I can't think of a much crueler punishment though then for people to suddenly wake up one morning and have the Constitution of the United States gone and all the rights established under it. That happened to me you know and it is I have to say the biggest reason I have fought so hard. I understand it's ramifications.
WHAT DOES THIS APPLICATION DO
What this APPLICATION actually does is request or demand that the entire Court come in for a decision on Justice Sotomayor and Justice Kagan, consider the actions in the APPLICATION and the Full Court can 'STAY' her denial of the Time Extension and also consider the basis of a Recusal. I wrote once we had to get the EYE of the Court, and we did with Justice Sotomayor acting. Now we gain the EYE of the Entire Court if we didn't have it. What this action does is ruin any probability that this Case can be channeled into a dismissal by a single Justice. Sotomayer controls the entire Tenth Circuit and Kagan controls for the Court both the Sixth and Seventh Circuits. This combines to cover, well see for yourself. This a Court within a Court. ( UT.,WY.,CO.,KS.,OK.,N.M.,WI.,ILL.,IN.,MI.,OH.,KY.,TN.,) From the APPLICATION FOR STAY ON SOTOMAYERS DENIAL which asks for a Full Review, meaning from the Full Court.
WHAT DOES THIS APPLICATION DO
What this APPLICATION actually does is request or demand that the entire Court come in for a decision on Justice Sotomayor and Justice Kagan, consider the actions in the APPLICATION and the Full Court can 'STAY' her denial of the Time Extension and also consider the basis of a Recusal. I wrote once we had to get the EYE of the Court, and we did with Justice Sotomayor acting. Now we gain the EYE of the Entire Court if we didn't have it. What this action does is ruin any probability that this Case can be channeled into a dismissal by a single Justice. Sotomayer controls the entire Tenth Circuit and Kagan controls for the Court both the Sixth and Seventh Circuits. This combines to cover, well see for yourself. This a Court within a Court. ( UT.,WY.,CO.,KS.,OK.,N.M.,WI.,ILL.,IN.,MI.,OH.,KY.,TN.,) From the APPLICATION FOR STAY ON SOTOMAYERS DENIAL which asks for a Full Review, meaning from the Full Court.
" The
reason this Court cannot exempt an unqualified President is because the
Constitution is then made null and void. By that this Court’s official
Jurisdiction is also ended under the U.S. Constitution, overruled by the People’s
vote.
It
is therefore requisite of the Court to consider very seriously the
qualifications for the Office of the President this Case affords and the
People’s vote particularly relevant under fraudulent circumstances is not
valid."
Now I think the people who have money are about the least likely people to understand this. The Lord says it is very difficult for a rich man to understand. In fact he says its easier for a camel to walk through the eye of a needle than a wealthy man into the kingdom of God, nevertheless it is possible.( ref. Holy Bible-Mark 10:25; Luke 18:25) At the same time, I can think of no man who needs the Constitution more than a rich man, for without it things change very quickly.
There is no rich people who have supported my Case. It is very true they do not know or understand what is at stake. If they did, they would be supporting it. That is why it is important for we poor people to help them see and understand. We as poor people are rich in understanding and it is our job to help the rich people in their poverty of understanding this.
Cody Robert Judy - Candidate for President '08-'12-'16
You get to decide that. I'd say don't trust bad legal advice and contribute what you can TODAY FOR A BETTER AMERICA TOMORROW
Cody Robert Judy- Presidential Candidate '08-'12-'16
Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.
*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION
1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396
Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin
The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.
Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.
INSPIRING - I believe in You
APPLICATION FOR STAY PENDING FULL REVIEW ON THE RECUSAL OF JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT AND KAGAN FROM PROCEEDINGS
No comments:
Post a Comment