Monday, August 24, 2015



Often the Cases of the United States Supreme Court are what the general public might call 'word-salad'. While it may be hard to understand the purposes of such are often just the opposite of trying to be difficult. The are truly in the interest of being able to say the most in as little space as possible or that is permissible by the rules of the Court. The Main Stream Media has even been known, in their rush to report the findings of the Court, to get it wrong and have to back track their Reports. Most people will not even read this or understand what is happening, but when it does they may want to come back and see what happened and why, and that is quite simply the purpose of this Report.

According to an ABC Report last year 83% of Americans identify themselves as Christian that would have to include a pretty large portion of both the Republican and Democratic Parties of America who at least believe that Politicians ought to be true and faithful rather than dishonest and untrustworthy in a moral attribute of their faith's identity of the Big 10 and those who are not Christians probably have some affinity with the basics of Trust and Truth as those who would also share a hope to walk into their Bank and not find their money missing?

What I'm saying is you really have to be an idiot not to ascribe the desire most have in many circumstances and situations in our life to at least desire the Truth in the Order of being True and Faithful. Oh how happy are the people when they find those two things in their life and how sad they are when they come up missing.

Most all Christian Faiths find their treasures in expanding canonical text of the Bible that their Church Leaders refer and read to them as they gather together and worship considering how they apply to them in their daily lives. That has been a tradition handed down for many thousands of years as we have witnessed many old Testament Prophesies come true in the New Testament. In that spirit of prophesy, which we read, see, and bear witness to in Christ how glorious are they that publish glad tidings from the truly astoundingly true words found in Isaiah 52:7:
"How beautiful upon the mountains are the feet of him that bringeth good tidings, that publisheth peace; that bringeth good tidings of good, that publisheth salvation; that saith unto Zion, Thy God reigneth!"

The prophesies of the Old Testament didn't stop with the New Testament, nor did prophesies made in both the Old and the New Testament stop which were understood to be a Record of those things which were yet to come to pass, even in our modern day or what was termed the last days or in the end of times. The scripture of Isaiah 52:7 hold every bit of a wonderful articulate description for things that were prophesied to come to pass in our day that we see and will yet see.

With that in mind I wanted to expand upon what exactly the United States Supreme Court had in front of them in Judy v. Obama 14-9396 as far as an important Record for our time to help us understand what is happening and why in the interest of  Trust and Truth we are seeing in it's development a quite remarkable and astounding record to consider by which we might also be found apposed or supporting.

So let me go through as I know the case quite well and communicate to you in very simple terms what is inside the 'word-salad' of Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the TOP-10 Main considerations of the Case in a legal sense without all the Case Law backing up every point ad nauseam.

  • Judy v. Obama 14-9396 at its core reports to the court the damages caused by the Constitutionally unlawful Candidacy found in Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro based upon the Constitution's Qualifications asserted that the President and Vice President must be a 'natural born Citizen' ie. Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents upon the Presidential Campaigns of Cody Robert Judy in 2008 and 2012 as well 2016.
  • The Argument constitutes that the Constitution's Qualifications for the President and Vice President of (Natural Born Citizen) are separate or distinct from those qualifications of Representatives and Senators (Citizen) and that combining them without a Constitutional Amendment is considered illegal or an action prohibited by standards of constitutional construction restraints found in Case Law.
  • The Argument brings to light what is considered a Legislative Mandate or The Peoples' Will through their Representatives in Congress in that eight attempts since 2003 that have failed to make the legal change required that would then be the Judicial Branches duty to uphold if it had changed. The fact it did not change is a witness to the Court of what should be upheld in their positions for the Constitution and also The People's Will. Never before had two certifications been necessary underscoring the illegal intent.
  • The Argument brings to the attention what would be considered a quid pro quo alliance between three major Presidential Candidates representing two major parties in the Republicans and Democrats who through manipulation and agreement sought to change the Constitution's Qualifications but only got half of Congress to support it in the U.S. Senate, as a non-binding resolution numbered as 511. The three Candidates for President were Sen. Hillary Clinton, Sen. Barack Obama, and Sen. John McCain. 
  • The Argument advocates that once this was undertaken a Cabal was created in the Order of a Cartel or illegal Monopoly formed by Barack Obama's Campaign Corporation and the Democratic National Committee Corporation which acted illegally by certifying Barack Obama as a legal Candidate. The evidence of this secret combination was Rep. Nancy Pelosi's signature on not one, but two distinct and separate certifications, for Obama as the parties nominee, which declared the Candidate legal by Constitutional Standards in the Constitution, while he was not.
  •   The Argument advocates that the combination of these Corporations in the illegal actions constitutes the formation of an illegal cartel formed with the intent of monopolizing against the Campaign and Candidacy for President Cody Robert Judy who would not yield his Civil Rights of a fair and equal race according to the Standards set as the Constitution's Qualifications against the Cartel's illegal actions.
  • The Argument advocates that Mr. Judy is within his rights to report directly to the Courts without an Attorney General representing him, according to the parameters dedicated by Congress in the Sherman/Clayton Acts of Congress specifically mentioning such authority, and that it was then the Court's obligation through the Presiding Judge of the Case to refer the Case to the Attorney General for back up and that this did not happen in the lower District Court or in the Appeal to the 10th Circuit.
  • The Argument advocates that the United States Supreme Court can also hear the Case De Novo and ask the Court to do as much.  De Novo is a Latin expression meaning 'from the beginning", "afresh", "anew", or "beginning again", which would set aside any of the lower Court's assumptions that the Defendant was not served properly and thereby make the findings of the lower Court's opinions obsolete in any technicality that might disrupt the interest of Justice on such an important matter as to be affecting millions of lives and the very fabric of soundness in the United States Election process and voters ability to at least have the opportunity to vote for a legally qualified Candidate rather than be subjects to the ill-gotten and nefarious whims of celebrity politicians deliberately obstructing the Constitution.  
  • The Argument advocates that this is not a 'one party' issue of concern when it comes to the considerations of the Court because both major parties in the Republicans and Democrats are involved heavily with what would be considered as main stream Candidates in McCain, Obama, Cruz, Rubio, Jindal and Obama mentioned in Application 15A25 , so is not just a consideration of damages of 2008 and 2012, but also a consideration of the future integrity of the Presidential Race in 2016 and all those Americans caught in cross-fire of fraud or supporting a Candidate for President who should he be elected would not be qualified for the Office of the President or Vice President. 
  • The Argument advocates that Mr. Judy is the only Presidential Candidate in the entire United States who has also advocated the Principle for both parties equally and justly as he served McCain and Obama Federal Law Suits in the past and has continually kept his Standing by either suing them or entering the race once a Candidate was illegally chosen by the Democratic Party as was the case with Obama in 2012, as a write-in Candidate sustaining the damages and harm caused until the next election where he then again entered the race as a Candidate with Standing claiming harm in the next election thus showing continuity of the damages. This relieves any derogatory or ill-gotten 'race card' Obama or the Main Stream Media might trump or assess as an inequality or unfairness against Obama personally. Mr. Judy also includes a the law enforcement investigation of AZ. Sheriff Joe Arpaio's cold case posse as evidence of identification fraud in Obama's long form birth certificate and draft registration.
    • September 28th, 2015 is the scheduled 2nd Conference Date on this Case in the United States Supreme Court.

With so many Candidates running for President who have not undertaken the grueling road of upholding the Principle of the 'natural born Citizen' qualification, bound by the Constitution's outline as the Supreme Law of the Land, a real consideration must be made by Voters and Supporters of what they actually hope for in the reasonable support of their favored Candidate.

  • To understand the Candidates who are running that have held some form or Government Position by election during or since Obama's usurpation begin, is to identify that Candidates use of that Office in any form to advocate opposition to the highly visible usurpation of the Office of the President. Did he/she say anything regarding about the Crime of the Century high-jacking the American Elections and the office of the President by someone who was unqualified and certainly had no business whatsoever being in that Office using the Constitution as a Standard of Defense?
  • If they did not do that.. you have a Coward of the Constitution you can identify very quickly! 
  • If they were not elected in any previous elected Office, and as a business person did not raise their voice against the usurpation of the Office of the President in the capacity of their prominence as a business person considered as a leader in the community, then you have someone who either does not understand the Constitution and the precepts it identifies as needing to be upheld or does not even understand the qualifications of the Office they are running for and thus are rather incompetent or would be very infirm in the office of the president for your consideration.
  • If they spoke out as an unelected person on the usurpation of the Office of the President in Obama as a particularly successful business person and then ultimately refused to support a Candidate who was the only one in America with a bi-partisan Federal Court Record you can assume either two things:
    • Their motive was not honest in speaking out and was perhaps even cultivated or garnered for a quid pro quo government/business favor. In other words they did it as a favor in order to move themselves ahead financially obtaining some kind of leverage that might also be important in the future. OR
    • If their motive was honest and true and they withheld their support specifically asked for, then they are just stupid in which case you wouldn't want to trust them with the Office of the President anyway. They ultimately would prove no better then the politicians in the offices now who have kept their ears shut, their mouths shut, and their eyes shut, lending the infirm consequence of being led by the deaf, dumb, and the blind. 
  • That basically covers every Candidate for President now running in the 2016 Field for both Parties as well as the Independent Candidates and leaves only one who has actually been Faithful and True to you. One is better then none.

It doesn't take long if you consider the Republican Candidates, who have been elected before in some form, to understand they consider Obama's reign to be every bit as un-constitutional as I do by the simple fact that they want to undue every executive order and piece of legislation he is credited for. According to their own words most would spend their first day writing out executive orders that would over-ride the executive orders and legislation like Obamacare that had been passed they disagreed with over the last seven years.

In other words, they want to do exactly what Judy v. Obama 14-9396 will do, but they just want to do it denying the concepts of the qualifications of the Constitution for the Office of the President and rather in their own election as President. 

What does that tell you? What that tells you is they do not want to bound by the Constitution when they get in the Office of the President either, just the same as Obama. Don't be fooled. How could their motives and desires be found out more truly than simply asking them, "If Obama was found ineligible wouldn't that negate every piece of legislation he has signed rather than legitimize it first, so that you can illegitimize  it with your executive orders?"

The other Democratic Party Candidates either don't have a clue or are in on not understanding the ramifications of what has happened. That is no indication of leadership you need or want right now. 

Of course. They do not want to be held to accountability for Obama's usurpation so they have to legitimize Obama as legal first, so they can have the honor of disavowing him and his decisions. Are they ashamed of the Constitution's Standards and afraid of actually standing up for them as Candidates for President in their responsibility of holding "Standing" against any Candidate in their party who is illegal?

While I can't tell you how to vote or who to support, I can show you why you shouldn't support or vote for any of the Candidates, and I can also show you how if you start looking you will start seeing, how the Bible in Gods' own words to his Prophets seen so many centuries ago, is also testifying to you that this is the way it was going to be for America. Consider the three literal things we see happening right now in the captioned picture of this Post referencing REVELATION Chapter 19.

  • You would only have One who was Faithful and True to the Constitution
  • He would ride a White Horse as sign you would see.
  • His Word would be his Sword
 How does the word become so powerful as to be considered a weapon like a sword? Can we not consider when it comes out of the Supreme Court as affecting the Law of the Land, that everyone adheres to that its pretty powerful, but still didn't act as a regular sword which just cuts the heads off of those who defy the law putting them up on a stake for everyone to see?

It might be a nuance that you don't want to see, but really that is me on that "White" Arabian stallion in the picture. I trained horses professionally for years and both my parents were teachers of horsemanship. Ironically,  the Stallion's name was Fad-A-Lad and he has long ago retired to his heavenly home being the faithful friend of Celeste Huston, the widow of  John Huston who also directed The Bible: In the Beginning .

Another interesting fact to consider. Who among the Presidential Candidates do you know my fellow Christians, that has actually suffered and been imprisoned for testifying of God's word to a religious congregation and has as part of his Record a reputation as a Prophet not forgotten twenty-two years ago?

What are the Facts of the Record:
No physical weapon substantiate

The Word contrived in a religious meeting by The State as to a fixed meaning which is unconstitutional AND unrepresentative of the actual evidence.

The physical evidence actually being what Cody had stated was in the brief case containing his Bible and B.O.M. or Book of Mormon that the SWAT team opened up saw and decided to blow up for the camera's anyway in a symbolic destruction of what is and should be considered most holy to God. His own words.

Newspaper accounts related to the event say Cody testified at the time, it was an action of God in lawful correction. This really should have protected Cody under the Constitution's free exercise of religion and Utah's even more adamant defense of 'religious sentiment'.

Does the United States of America regularly harbor  Religious Protesters in their Prisons for eight years who caused no harm, made no financial demands, hurt no property or person, and in whom their was no weapon found accept the word of God in Cannon Text?

Does in the course of loving the Facts, if that is important to you, the UNION of Church and State coming together in the evidence used in a Court to prosecute a person, in the Video of the event, denied to the accused count as a willful neglect constituting an unlawful prosecution? Of course it does, especially when the accused accounts of being viciously beaten by the mob who sought to excuse themselves from prosecution and never have faced Trial on their own actions in the mob and unconstitutional prosecution.

Does the presiding Judge in the Case also hold allegiance to the LDS Church as a Bishop at the time under the same authority of the person so interrupted at the event called a Church Fireside? Of course he does receiving many letters and directions from the LDS Church Presidency.

These FACTS cannot be denied.


How is it possible that the one person who that unlawful prosecution happened to, is actually also the ONE and only Candidate for President in America with a bi-partisan federal court record of upholding the Constitution's Principle Qualifications for the Office of the President upon which Trillions of dollars rest in USA DEBT and many lives have been lost over?

Was is not the Jews in the Bible who also are accredited to the religious persecution of the Prophet/Savior Jesus Christ? The one who had labeled at the head of his cross THIS IS THE KING OF THE JEWS (in his own opinion) the Jews protested and might have added, but Pilate wouldn't allow it to be changed? Luke 23:38

At the heading of my introduction referencing the picture with Gov. Christie below, these people wrote, "Cody Robert Judy is the next prophet of the Mormon Church" - in his opinion.

When you start looking at the ironies of how much of the same thing is going on with our Government and the corruption of the law you start understanding why God sends prophets to make Records by which Judgement can come and be found Faithful and True, and for those who actually have their eyes open and ears open it is not to big of a leap of faith to understand God's love is the same today as it ever has been and always will be.

One thing I know. You can ridicule, make fun, mock, taunt, jeer, sneer, deride, scorn, laugh, and point all you want at me but it will catch up to you. Clearly, my message is not just Domestic. Yes, I'm also talking to foreign Governments who 'think' that compromising America's Constitution will come without consequence to them as they seek disruption of civility here in America. You think you can sell America, buy America, and sink America as the United States of America, give it a try, for in that your Communism may rise a bit in popularity but clearly you have not understood the Almighty Creator's love and tender mercies for America.

This land is a choice land, but can only be ruled under the Supreme Law of the Land in healthy attribution to the world. That law is the U.S. Constitution. When you seek or anyone seeks to disrupt that, they seek the wrath of the whirlwind inside the most powerful force understood by the human mind. Clearly, what I am plainly referring, to the enemies of the United States Constitution foreign and domestic, you will lose.

Believe me when I say for Foreigners bent on the destruction of the USA, "Perhaps we have not thought this through clearly?", will be the deafening understatement echoed across the Universe by your children, and your children's children. Do not suppose you can mock God in his Supreme Law for this Land. Pitting your will against His will be your undoing.

Believe me, I know when your wife begins to make comments about the money not being what it used to be. I know the problems of which you will go through and I know just how fast God can take it all away from you and give it to someone else. I have suffered the likeness of these while you talked about me and the days were not easy nor were they short.

You may have thought 'CHANGE' sounded good screamed at the podium by and from Barack Hussein Obama, but you will find 'REPENT' whispered from Cody Robert Judy to sink so deep within your Soul that a Restoration is made very clear in your mind. And what must be Restored?

If you do not Restore the Constitution of the United States of America as Supreme Law of this Land, and I mean that by getting the USURPER out of the White House with the use of the Constitution in the Right way BLACK MONDAY will continue to BLACK TUESDAY and that will continue to BLACK WEDNESDAY and BLACK THURSDAY etc etc until one SUNDAY you'll wake up and find its ALL GONE.

 Believe me, it gets really hard to try to pay a multiple thousand dollar mortgage earning $20 dollar bills instead of $1,000 dollar bills.

And what will I say to you? Yes, I understand, but there is a penalty affixed that I cannot remove for what you have done to me. I suffered greatly because of you and now you want me to pay for your baby-sitter? Let us think about that for awhile, while we watch this ECONOMIC STORM you thought Obama was worth?

If you do not think this has anything to do with me, you really do not understand the Bible you profess to believe in. And you certainly do not think it has anything to do with you. You really do not value the United States Constitution or think its precepts apply to you or are something you should care about and support.

Let me share with you God has a very clear way of making things very personal because he does love each and every one of you and you will feel it. Believe me.... you will feel it.

Cody Robert Judy

Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.
Web Site 

Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!

Cody Robert Judy's book :
 Taking A Stand- the Conservative Independent Voice.

Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.

1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.

INSPIRING - I believe in You



  1. This case gets to be a brain twister when it really could be simplified as to a simple Yes or No. Beings it is what it is for all America you are to be congratulated for birthing the issue and sticking with it. If the truth is ever unveiled in a meaningful (legal) way it will be to your dogged efforts. Thank You. So many writers et al want to still label the curious investigators as "racists" which is so sad. God has your back I believe.

  2. @Sunshine Thank you so much for that comment. Of course if God has my back in this Case no one will stand a chance against me. If he does not have my back in this case, the world will be a much more dangerous place for those in high places for there will not be any rules and it is the rich who really require the rules to secure their safety. It would be a really dumb move on their part, but we are where we are on those dumb moves on their part. So, we will see which way they will have it.

    You know the wonderful thing I think is there is actually a choice. That part is just so sweet and tender. I just love God because he is always so considerate that way. It really is wonderful!