America Shifts towards Birthers

America Shifts towards Birthers
Editorial Feature on ObamaBallotChallenge.com http://obamaballotchallenge.com/america-shifts-towards-birthers

The gears of America are shifting towards Birthers like the 18 Wheeler approaching the downgrade decline where brakes are of no more use and you can palatably smell and see the smoke rising from the wheels. When your knuckles on the steering wheel clinching become white and your heart is pounding at the corner coming up in the wonder of the hairpin turn that you hope you’ve slowed down enough to make without peeling your load off the road completely.

The roar of the diesel engine grinds down low screaming loud in protest but you know it’s the only way of making the road ahead safely and so you’re buckled up prepared as any for the truth of the Birther corner to unfurl as America begins to connect the dots that reveal the most nefarious fraud perpetrated upon the American Republic for which we stand.

Rush Limbaugh’s voice has cracked this week like the whip across America calling the commander-in-thief by his reality show famed name -“Barry Soetoro” - announcing to all of quit-wit an emperor with no clothes on and the haunting facts of the fraud.

Glenn Beck, in the days of 2008 Gov. Sarah Palin and Sen. (McNasty) McCain’s campaign once a “Republican Party Dandy”, this week resembled the tearful Pastor confessing to a world-wide audience in humble recognition of the power of truth that we just can’t pick and choose what parts of the Constitution we’re going to uphold and which parts we’re going to ignore.

Beck even went so far as to hold R -Rep. Michele Bachmann’s feet to the fire when she defended the NSA’s intrusion upon American’s privacy and the morphed mentality that security trumps freedom summed up as, “If you’re not doing anything wrong you shouldn’t be worried about the Government in bed and in the bathroom with you, just like prisoners are treated”. [Post script 8-11-13: John McCain's just mad anyone knows anything except him confirming however younger Americans' don't trust their own government]

The Birthers have been fighting for freedom and liberty all across America all along. Glenn Beck stated in so many words, independence and libertarian ideals have permeated the destroyed Republican Party based on its affair with neo-con progressivism Newt Gingrich idols himself as. It’s no secret that this basically allowed the Fraud-in-Chief to waltz into the White House without a thought of the qualifications of the Office of the President demanded in the United States Constitution.

The only ones left in the shadows of dark crevices are the U.S. Senators and U.S. House of Representatives trembling on the controls of election magnificence in debating the fear of the multitudes and the popularity contest which freaks them out every two years, in the discernment of which hot poker they prefer.

It is rather telling when the guy who thought up “The Patriot Act” which loosened the controls of the Judicial Branch upon the Executive Branch, stated in regards to the NSA’s invasion of America’s homes, bedrooms and bathrooms, that this is out of control and we shouldn’t be spying on our own people.

Now CNN is actually making a move for what they see as a ‘nitch’. The “nitch” is actually called journalism and is a move away from the solidarity of the White House, and towards “The People”. Imagine the concept? It's the capitalistic way shall we say?

Obama/Soetoro has long quit providing the dollars for the Media and while the stocks of the Media Moguls crash in the fight for dollars has ABC, NBC, and CBS scrimping on things like pencils and paper-clips, a new strategy has to be invented to survive.

The unique perspective actually is The United States Constitution!

Truth aims to destroy things like robbery and thievery. The American People don’t like invasions of their privacy and while Bush may have got a push for the New World Order, Obama is the spear-of-the-cheer towards ending the sovereignty of the United States by destroying the Constitution as a walking talking violation himself.

While Americans may have wondered why the United States Supreme Court justices refused to even hear arguments in Judy v. Obama 12-5276 in 2012 and 2013 ,a case that came up through the State Courts of New Hampshire and Georgia, that showed Obama’s long form birth certificate to be nothing more than a long form fabrication with over 2500 hundred hours of investigation by professional law enforcement agencies, the breaking news of the NSA’s involvement in spying on Americans has completely unveiled the mystery.

What Americans just barely found out was true, as far as being spyed on, has been entrenched in the mind of the Justices and elected officials long before 2008. American’s are reeling from the realization just the same way that Congress and the Justices across America have already gone through long since.

Ever wondered why no Birther Cases got any action in Georgia? Well, Georgia’s pussy-sport-port has been supported by Obama and is making news today. Glenn Beck was laughing at Obama’s gaffe claiming North & South Carolina and Georgia were part of the Gulf and this port had to be opened up. Glen and Stu were open mouthed in laughter as they debated the intelligence of perhaps opening the port up to the Gulf underneath the Continent from Georgia to Texas. They surmised “that’s probably what O was talking about” as the god-king whose smarter than all.

Connecting the dots is a little game where you connect the dots with lines and then start to see the answer to the mystery picture that hasn’t been seen or has been hidden by a lack of lines in the maze of dots. That is exactly what is happening now as America is informed that the NSA has indeed been spying on them and is collecting their data and info.

How do you feel about living under the same conditions that prisoners live under America?

The biggest problem with that is Elected Officials can easily be manipulated to say, “not investigate the occupier of the White House whose blatantly handed out to the Press in the White House Press core room a known fabrication of his identity. Why would such be necessary and even better how do you suppose O thought he was going to get away with it?

The answer is “CONTROL”!

Corking up Americans in a prison and shaking the bottle never has had good consequences. It didn’t work out that well for England and though this plan remains abit shaded the plot is perfectly understood and soon will be recognized for what it is by every American.

Every American wishing to live in a society that isn’t so controlled by security that it has forgotten courtesy.

Americans are now faced with the thoughts of a bigger challenge: Actually finding politicians who can’t be bought off or controlled by bullied threats, bribes, and assaults. In short America is now looking for politicians who have a ruined reputation anyway so it doesn’t matter. How interesting to see the new American politician comes out of prison to save his countrymen from theirs.

Glenn Beck did an interesting interview with a gal running for office in Georgia. Glenn asked her some interesting questions. He asked her first what she thought was the biggest problem facing Americans?

She said “They don’t trust their Government” Glenn responded, “Why should they trust you?” In other words Glenn was asking her what on your record indicates I have some collateral to trust you to uphold the Constitution when the people I’ve elected haven’t as soon as they get to D.C.?

She didn’t have a good answer because she has no record of action that is convincing. She only has her word that “you can trust her”.”.. but that’s what everyone else said to”, said Beck. She didn’t have a record of supporting the Constitution in objecting to Obama’s eligibility but I do and that is why Americans can trust me. I not only have a record with Obama, but I’ve got one with McCain who wasn’t a natural born citizen qualified either..so it crosses party lines.

We as Americans, though from different parties, should at least unite under the Supreme Law of the Land as the Constitution.

Glenn asked her, “ What are your principles and where is your soul?” She said it was "stirring" but as a politicians running how could her soul be okay having not even understood the biggest fraud in American history in Obama? How is the Republican Parties Soul anyway? It’s dying and it’s not well because of the malignancy of Obama’s eligibility.

I directed a question twice to the Republican Party, once before the 2008 election and once before the 2012 election: “Do you supposed as big believers in God and the divine inspiration of the United States Constitution that God will actually reward you by winning the election, for the actions of not standing up on Obama’s eligibility demanded by the Constitutions’ requirements?”

So far I’ve been right and the Republicans have been wrong with hundreds of millions of dollars going to waste in contributions that make exclamation in proving the point of principle. Now, is it a lessen learned well or has the heart of the Republican Party become so hardened that it will not resolve or repent the principle that it has abandoned?

I think the 2012 election was a confirmation of that heart being so hardened that it will not resolve it or repent of it and thusly will never be rewarded with the Office of the President again! This is why after the 2012 election I received this commercial in a dream near verbatim. I took it as revelation and what was going to happen. Look! Just in this last week, discussed in this article, how much closer we have come to that exact thing happening. America is shifting towards Birtherism and away from general population prison controls.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4otwMXGzvac




[ If you would like to help Cody Robert Judy in his bid for upholding the Constitution in “America’s Birther Campaign”, or ABC Campaign ,which highlights the United States Constitution with information and education for voters to understand the tough questions politicians should be answering in 2014, and in the coming 2016 election for the Office of the President please make a contributions here: ]http://www.codyjudy.us/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm




Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODY JUDY / CODE4PRES

Cody Robert Judy Ltr. U.S. Supreme Court July 1st,2012

FOR IMMEDIATE PRESS RELEASE:




http://www.scribd.com/doc/98823939/U-S-Supreme-Court-Ltr-July-1st-2012-from-Cody-Robert-Judy

CODY ROBERT JUDY
3031 So. Ogden Ave. Suite #2
Ogden UT. 84401

- - - - - - - -
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Office of the Clerk – Mr. William K. Suter
Washington, DC 20543-0001
- - - - - - - - -

RE: Cody Robert Judy v. Barack Obama July 1st, 2012

Dear Mr. Suter- Clerk of the Court:
The first class mail return of my document, Petition for Writ of Certiorari on June 30th, 2012, was returned with a letter dated from the Clerk Gail Johnson June 28th 2012 stating:
“Dear Mr. Judy- The above-entitled petition for a writ of certiorari was received again on June 28th, 2012, and is herewith returned for the reason stated in my letter May 17th,2012. Sincerely William K. Suter, Clerk – By Gail Johnson”

Also included in the returned box was a copy of the May 17th,2012 letter clarifying any doubt of the reasons it was sent back stating – “ The enclosed papers were received again on May 17th, 2012 and are herewith returned for the reasons stated in my letter dated April 10,2012. Until and unless you receive a decision from a United States Court of Appeals or highest state court within which a decision could be had this Court does not have jurisdiction of your case. By: Gail Johnson

Sir, the Petition for Writ of Certiorari dated June 25th,2012 has an appeal for the eleventh circuit from the highest court available in Georgia- The Georgia Supreme Court Judy v. Obama et.al., Case No. S12D1584.

The abusive treatment I am the recipient of in the return of my document by analyst Gail Johnson apparently not even analyzing my document and thinking it was the same document of April 4th,2012 is definitely a bias towards me that has prejudiced me and my Petition for a Writ of Certiorari. The first paragraph states Sir that the Supreme Court of Georgia granted my ‘indigent status’.

How could I have indigent status from the Georgia Supreme Court if I didn’t’ have a decision from the Georgia Supreme Court in my appeal to the U.S. Supreme court? Why would I have included a copy of the Notice of Appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court from the Georgia Supreme Court if I didn’t have an Appeal from the highest court in Georgia? Why should a document dated June 25th,2012 be considered the same document as one dated April 4th,2012 worthy of the same letter of May 17th,2012 when a denial is on record in the Petition for Writ of Certiorari of a decision made by the Georgia Supreme Court June 21st, 2012 case No S12D1584?

If the Clerk’s Office had a question for me why can’t you or Ms. Johnson just call me instead of sending the documents back costing the Court more money in the return and me time and more money in postage in re-sending them?

This employed tactic was used by the Georgia Supreme Court and I immediately faxed them copies of the Orders that were had in the Superior Court, which they could have got from the Court also but chose to get them from me which was okay, and I did my very best to accommodate any questions they had.

My concern of time is a genuine concern on the merits of the case and delay such as Ms. Gail Johnson seems to be employed in is having the affect of biasing me from the U.S. Supreme Court consideration.

I have now been to two State Supreme Courts both of which are entered in the Petition for Writ of Certiorari- One State Supreme Court decision from the New Hampshire Supreme Court and the latest Supreme Court decision from the Georgia Supreme Court. These are both Courts qualifying, as is stated in the May 17th, 2012 letter from Ms. Gail Johnson as “highest state court within which a decision could be had” and the presumption “until” and “unless” I had a decision from the highest state court presumes I would receive a U.S. Supreme Court case number with State Supreme Court case numbers which I haven’t so far.

My June 25th,2012 Petition for Writ of Certiorari to make things as simple and plain as I possible can is from the Georgia Supreme Court, case number again is JUDY v. OBAMA et.al, S12D1584 received June 21st,2012.

If the Justices had been informed of my case it may have altered their decision on the ACA Decision as Obama is not eligible or qualified by the demands of the Constitution for the Office of the President. I feel that withholding my case from their consideration is a blatant discrimination towards me and towards the Justice of their decisions that may have been altered if presented.

That circumvention of Justice is not at all my fault. It is remains at the feet of the Clerk’s office of which you are in charge. If the ACA needed an eligible person first qualified under the Constitution as President to sign it, and Obama was not, the Act was not ripe for the U.S. Supreme Court decision and their decision is rendered ‘moot’.

While the Justices have recessed as of June 29th,2012 my Petition for Writ of Certiorari was in their halls June 27th,2012 and absolutely capable of being considered albeit your handing it to them. The timing of my Petition is imperative to the scheduled Sept. 5th,2012 National Democratic Party Convention of which if considered from the moment it entered the halls of the U.S. Supreme Court June27th, 2012 meets the most important standing requirement number 3 ‘redressability’ thus the employment of stall is corrupting my redress of grievances rights.

There are three standing requirements:

1. Injury: The plaintiff must have suffered or imminently will suffer injury—an invasion of a legally protected interest that is concrete and particularized. The injury must be actual or imminent, distinct and palpable, not abstract. This injury could be economic as well as non-economic.
2. Causation: There must be a causal connection between the injury and the conduct complained of, so that the injury is fairly traceable to the challenged action of the defendant and not the result of the independent action of some third party who is not before the court.
3. Redressability: It must be likely, as opposed to merely speculative, that a favorable court decision will redress the injury.


By sending my papers back the Clerk’s office created a problem in that the Court won’t see my Petition for Writ of Certiorari until after the Democratic National Convention Sept. 5th, 2012 because the Justices recess until I believe the first Monday in October, 2012.
My petition requires their immediate attention due to an election and when election dates are in place and cannot be and a complaint as mine is brought before the Court, a special consideration must be called by the Court.
1- http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/breaking-news-us-supreme-court-calls-special-session-on-obama
2- http://codyjudy.blogspot.com/2012/06/breaking-news-us-supreme-court-calls.html

I’m informing you this must be done in the interest of elections that the Court’s decision is not ‘put-off’ until their decision is made ‘moot’. The U.S. Supreme Court is not meant to be ‘put out’ of the business of interpreting the Constitution as a check and balance in the Judicial Branch, especially in the interest of securing and protecting our United States Election process and our Constitution’s demands.
The Court is intended to serve the Constitution, rather than the Constitution to serve the Court.

The Supreme Court is well within its right to Order and or Announce a special session as it did in Jan 2010, and June of 2012 to specifically deal with a certain business and nothing else. I contend my case qualifies for that due to the nature and timing of the Democratic National Convention of which is still 2 months away but may be placed in jeopardy if a special session is not called for or delayed until October 2012.

The Petition must be given to the Justices immediately and the 30 days to grant or deny on the specific interest of the election timing. The order must be made for the timing of such responses to the Petition to be shortened to give all parties fair notice that delay is not a tactic that can be employed to prejudice justice, in the order of justice.

I have complied with your requirements that you set for me in getting a Supreme Court decision and I certainly would appreciate your sincere assistance in seeing this case to the Honorable Court Justices.

I have attached to this letter the decision noted on the Notice of Appeal from the GEORGIA SUPREME COURT attached also within the PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIOARI June 25th,2012.

Thank you most Sincerely Yours,
Cody Robert Judy

Complete Signed Petition for Writ of Certiorari Judy v. Obama
http://www.scribd.com/doc/98883410/Judy-v-Obama-U-S-Supreme-Crt-Petition-for-Writ-of-Certiorari-July-2012

JUDY V. OBAMA REACHES U.S. SUPREME COURT -THE DOOM OF JUNE FOR OBAMA

BREAKING NEWS:

JUDY V. OBAMA et.al., U.S. SUPREME COURT RECEIVES APPEAL OF GEORGIA SUPREME COURT OF OBAMA’S ELIGIBLITY ESCALATING-

THE DOOM OF JUNE FOR OBAMA

June is not shaping up to be the best month for Barack Obama, as more and more Democrats are looking at the toxicity of Obama and realizing that standing by the man is one thing, but declaring their own political future over is quite another.

Just how much weight must be placed upon the anchor before rational democrats who are still supporting Obama decide the same? I’m proud of Utah Democrat Rep. Jim Matheson here in my home state for realizing the truth when it comes to covering up weapon involvement in border patrol agent murders, dealing arms over the border to drug trafficking, and pulling federal programs meant to work with local law enforcement in enforcing laws passed for persons illegally entering the United States such as Obama did the day of the U.S. Supreme Court decision, are not really things that Democrats should be supporting.

Catering to the Hispanic/Mexican/Latino population vote has become all too clearly a mix of bad intention, and so it is with Obama clearly defying our U.S. Constitution’s demands for a ‘natural born citizen’, yet swearing out an oath and allegiance to preserve, protect and defend it. I can think of no better way to U.S.C. Amend. 14, Sect. 3- his sorry but blatant fraud and forgery.

For those hard working industrious people here working legally how big of a slap in the face is it for Obama/Holder/Clinton team to gun-traffic across the border? Why would they do that to people they claim to be working hard for?

Weapons to people known to be running illegal traffic across the border, drugs, sex-slaves, intelligence, and people are okay with that? That kind of makes standing up in a religious meeting where freedom of expression is the most important element of religious tenant and declaring I had a Book of Mormon abbreviated ‘BOM’ clearly represented as the evidence produced, in the Mormon Religion something that deserved 8 years in prison 20 years ago, while the other is seen as electable? WOW!

Come on , come on, come on – People I just know you anti-birthers on the Republican and Democrat side can do better than this. Your judgment is being strung out like a scrotum on the chopping block.

Has that been a service for the people here legally working hard on establishing good reputations or a dis-service?
Utah Democratic Rep. Jim Matheson said Tuesday he plans to vote in favor of holding Holder in contempt over his refusal to comply with a subpoena into the Operation Fast and Furious scandal.

“It just compounds the tragedy when both sides play politics instead of releasing the facts. The Terry family, the public and Congress deserve answers,” Matheson said in remarks first reported by the Salt Lake Tribune in his home state. “Sadly, it seems that it will take holding the attorney general in contempt to communicate that evasiveness is unacceptable.”

To make matters worse for Holder, President Barack Obama and the Democratic Party, more Democrats are expected to join Matheson in holding Holder in contempt. House Minority Whip Rep. Steny Hoyer, the House Democrats’ chief vote-counter, isn’t even sure how many Democrats will break ranks. According to the Associated Press — which framed the Democratic defections as a result of the NRA’s decision to score the vote — Hoyer wouldn’t say how many Democrats he expected to vote in favor of Holder in contempt, but confirmed he expects some, like Matheson, to abandon party lines.

http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/politics/54379772-90/holder-matheson-contempt-congress.html.csp
mcanham@sltrib.com

Now additionally to compound the doom of June for Obama, the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington DC received today, (June 27th,2012) at 10:49am the Petition for Writ of Certiorari, appealed from the Georgia Supreme Court denial of June 21st,2012.

Folks we are talking speed train 'fast-track', in the truest meaning of the word, and we may be talking just in time?

[Date: 06/27/2012
CODY JUDY:
The following is in response to your 06/27/2012 request for delivery information on your
Signature Confirmation(TM) item number 2308 3250 0000 2916 0065. The delivery record
shows that this item was delivered on 06/27/2012 at 10:49 AM in WASHINGTON, DC 20543
to L JOHNSON. The scanned image of the recipient information is provided below.]

There is a whole mess of problems the U.S. Supreme Court is dealing with the constitutionality of Obamacare, however wouldn’t it be shocking if they discovered in the late hour of deliberation they had a case that clearly met the criteria 3 legs of ‘standing’, and gave them power to rule upon Obama’s eligibility in the first place?

I felt like it was a slide into 3rd base and being called ‘SAFE!’ to have gotten the APPEAL in to the U.S. Supreme Court before the close of this session. I know it’s a nightmare but I didn’t plan it this way, it just happened.

Dealing with’ the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act’, the court has extended its session now till presumably Thursday, or tomorrow, at which time they planned to close shop until October 5th,2012. It is notable however that the Court has at times stayed open till even the 1st of July.

That’s 30 days after the Sept. 5th, 2012 Democratic National Convention and clearly their recess would biased not just my complaint, but the whole Democratic Party primary season, and certainly every delegate vote cast for an ineligible candidate.

Just to gain some inkling of what just happened let me reiterate; “Shake & Bake!” is the United States Constitution- parroting the famous line from movie Talladega Nights of which those who saw it can have a smile, and those who didn’t might have a look at a YouTube Clip here to grasp.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sLF31AY25so


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=43FfwAsSV4k&feature=related


I really don’t have a clue to what the U.S. Supreme Court will do, but I do know a couple of things that I will relate as facts to the anti-birther community that continues to roast the Birther movement as wing-nuts with a clue to any facts. Are you ready?

1- NEVER before has the U.S. Supreme Court received a Writ of Certiorari from a Presidential Candidate within the same party, clearing all 3 hurdles of standing, against Obama’s eligibility before the Democratic National Convention.

2- NEVER before has the U.S. Supreme Court received in such an appeal, a total disregard for their own precedent as they have from Judge Michael Malihi whose decision/opinion re-writes the Constitution’s unique qualification for our President that contrary to his opinion was not obliterated by the 14th Amendment’s “Citizen” clause found in Sect 1, which is an insult to the Constitution construction taboo.


Recently U.S. Supreme Court denied the Orly Taitz represented case that took a little over 3 years to get to the U.S. Supreme Court from the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals starting in Central California Federal District Court in Keyes v. Obama. Allan Keyes was a presidential candidate but the 9th Circuit ruled he candidacy issue was moot as he didn’t continue in 2012 and the U.S. Supreme Court concluded the case on June 11th, 2012 with a denial of the Writ of Certiorari.

As a Presidential Candidate Allan Keyes was running in the Republican Party and never really had a clear shot at getting the Republican nomination from contenders like Mitt Romney or John McCain in 2008, so the standing was questionable at best. A similar ruling was just handed down on Presidential Candidate John Dummett represented by Liberty Legal Foundation in a Tennessee Federal District Court case that was basically made fun of by the Judge.

Defendants restate their position that Plaintiffs lack standing. Specifically with respect to Plaintiff Dummett, Defendants concede that Dummett is a candidate in Tennessee for the Republican Party’s nomination for President of the United States. As such, Plaintiff Dummett is not a competitive opponent of President Obama in any election and accordingly cannot establish that he has competitive standing to bring this suit. Furthermore, Defendants assert that Plaintiff Dummett has not taken steps to appear on a ballot in the state of Tennessee. For these reasons, Plaintiff Dummett cannot establish an injury-in-fact in this case.

Speaking on John Dummett’s write-in campaign for President filed a day after the defense argument that he would not likely face Obama as a Republican nominee as he ran in that party the court said:

Plaintiff Dummett’s certificate only came into existence after Defendants filed their reply brief. The introduction of a new argument with new evidentiary support would likely require that Defendants be given the opportunity to respond. Third, even if the Court considered the certificate, the exhibit on its face does not indicate that Plaintiff Dummett will actually be a write-in candidate simply by filing the certificate or whether other steps are required to establish his status. It is not clear then that the certificate proves that Plaintiff Dummett will face the President in general election. Finally, the exhibit is curiously dated the day after Defendants filed their reply, giving the appearance that the certificate is a device to cure whatever standing problems Plaintiffs may have. At this point in the proceedings, Plaintiffs have not properly brought that issue before the Court. For all of these reasons, Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File a Supplemental Response is DENIED.

Now I bring these cases up not to belittle the hard work that went into them, nor the desire to see the Constitution upheld, for I feel these cases had that intent, but I bring them up to point out the complete difference that is represented in my case to the U.S. Supreme Court case with the direct competition between Obama and I in the Democratic Party for the nomination, and the complete disregard I have received from getting on the Ballots from the Democratic Chairmen’s bias towards Obama who I have shown is ineligible to be represented to the Secretary of States as eligible.
Indeed it’s a fraud in my mind to represent one candidate in the Democratic Party as the potential nominee who is voted for and recommended to use the States primary funds collected from tax payers in the actions of voting for him when he is ineligible for the Office of the President.

Indeed my campaign has represented itself competitive as say Mitt Romney’s on the internet with over 160 campaign commercials and videos, a blog with near 200 entries, a maintained web site with some 100 pages and campaign contributions coming in from near half the states. My campaign started the week before Gov. Rick Perry got into the Republican Campaign for president just to let you know how long it’s been around, and how long it’s lasted.

Anyone who discounts the time and effort and money and sacrifice that has gone into my campaign ought to just itemize themselves my campaign using estimates of the Republican Candidates side for what they had as far as the campaign items I’ve mentioned. I think one of the least of these was former Gov. and China Ambassador John Huntsman’s who was into it over 11 million dollars before he resigned his campaign- Santorum near 18.7 million and Paul 35 million-

http://money.cnn.com/2012/04/25/news/economy/Romney-campaign-spending-vote/index.htm


These campaigns, all of them didn’t come close to challenging Obama directly as mine does now. So what will the U.S. Supreme Court do? It's anyone's guess but they sure wouldn't have to release any decision on Obamacare if they find he is not an eligible person qualified for the Office of the President and certainly could not sign any law.

That is why my case ought to take precedence over their deliberation of Obama care and they ought to immediately set up a time and schedule to hear my case.



Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us

www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

www.youtube.com/user/CODE4PRES

www.facebook.com/CODE4PRES


Just as an add I wanted to put the link up of Esq. Larry Klayman's proposed Order denying the Motions to Dismiss which I thought was very informative, professional, and thorough.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/98311427/FL-Voeltz-2012-06-25-Voeltz-Proposed-Memorandum-Order#page=23

New Release: The Lion's Share- Original by Cody Robert Judy

FOR IMMEDIATE PRESS RELEASE: Commemorating Memorial Day in honoring our Military personnel, those who have died, been injured, and those who are fighting for the United States Constitution I am excited to release this new song and video, 'The Lion's Share". In creating this song, and feeling myself to be kind of an instrument from which this music and creation came, I was moved to depict two things:An honor for military's service and and honor for America's good deeds. So many times the chain reaction of good deeds is unnoticed and I wanted to depict that chain reaction which is amplified clear up to the Constitution of the United States and the honor we as Americans have living under it as The Supreme Law of the Land. This song is not fiction but a story that is true much of it happening in one day. The song is a celebration of gratitude. Happy Memorial Day - Enjoy! The LION'S SHARE http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Go5aQm8kBE The Lion's Share is an Original Song by The Cody Robert Judy band saluting the Military fighting men and women for America and the United States Constitution, as well as America's good heart and willingness to help others. Released on Memorial Day, May 28th,2012. Cody Robert Judy The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign www.codyjudy.us www.codyjudy.blogspot.com YouTube: CODE4PRES

A Birther Consolidation Behind My Campaign- Cody Robert Judy

MY COMMENT TO:


Obama eligibility: reactions to ruling

http://www.conservativenewsandviews.com/2012/02/04/constitution/obama-eligibility-reactions-ruling/#comment-6451
I sure enjoyed the article, keep up the good work. Just for a reference and also as a Plaintiff in the Georgia case with Orly Taitz Esq., here was my letter to Sec. Of State Brian Kemp.

http://www.codyjudy.blogspot.com/2012/02/cody-robert-judy-ltr-georgia-sec-of.html

As I read some of the comments I thought that the biggest problem facing The Birther Movement is a consolidated advertising force behind a specific candidate.

The reference to McCain in this article, [Likewise, the Senate resolution somehow “declaring” that Senator John McCain, R-Arizona, was a “natural-born citizen” could have no force or effect. Only a Constitutional amendment could possibly suffice for that. ], should not be under-valued, as he received first his "Citizen" status by an Act of Congress and second his "Natural Born Citizen" status by a second Act of Congress. The process is called "naturalization", and I believe the failure of many birther attorneys is to recognize the haphazard racist quagmire that is an easy leap by the Media when this is understood.

I sued McCain as a Presidential Candidate and Obama in 2008 so don’t fall into the trap set by the Media for the ‘racist’ label. That is an asset to the Birther Movement that has been unrealized.

The Birther Movement should consolidate its efforts and get behind me in a informing political advertising campaign made legal with my bid for President in 2012.

Failure on this issue may be laid at the table of the American People who are Birthers and have failed to contribute $5 to my campaign. If every Republican and Independent did, as well as at least 1/3 of the Democrat Party Obama has laid waste to, the Constitution would not fail and our campaign would be bigger and better funded than Mitt Romney or Obama.

Knowledge is the key and word of mouth is free. A Presidential Candidate can advertise at reduced rates and any network could be sued big time for a great deal of money if they denied a Presidential candidate from advertising in a discriminating way.

The problem has been a disagreement on how to bring the public into the arena of Obama’s ineligibility and the solution is now understood.
Please contribute to my campaign

Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us




Cody Robert Judy

CRJ Update: GA Case Denies Obama Motion to Dismiss

CRJ Update: GA Case Denies Obama Motion to Dismiss

Today, January 3rd, 2012, the Georgia Federal District Court Judge denied Obama’s Motion to Dismiss.

For a detailed report check out WND's Report here:

http://www.wnd.com/2012/01/court-obama-must-be-constitutionally-eligible/

As an update and intelligence report for those who read this, in understanding why it is so very important to help my campaign and contribute from many different States to show a well orchestrated and competitive campaign .

Dear Orly

Great News in Georgia, I'm sure our excitement is equal. ;)

I can just hear David De'Jute and Michael Jablonski's cogs turning as they try and tear apart this case with the "Political Question Doctorine", stating the same argument presented in the 9th Circuit:


(The political question doctrine serves to "restrain the judiciary from inappropriate interference in the business of the other branches of government" by prohibiting the courts from deciding issues that properly rest within the province of the political branches.)

(The issues sought to be raised by appellants herein, regarding both whether President Obama is a "natural born citizen of the United States" and therefore eligible to be president as well as any purported claims raised by any criminal statutes … are to be judged, according to the text of the Constitution, by the legislative branch of the government, and not the judicial.)


I wanted to give you some information about my campaign so that you are prepared to fight this kind of an argument off with facts relating to my campaign. I know this was a problem for your case with Allan Keyes, and there's no reason not to assume they may hit you with another Motion to Dismiss on different grounds such as this.

Here are some things you can mention about my campaign.

1) Cody Robert Judy is directly hurt by Obama's ineligibility because I am a candidate in the same party.

2) My campaign has 138 Videos on my self and my campaign YouTube Station CODE4PRES- (Mitt Romney's Believe In America YouTube station has 85 to date.)

3) Features a 50 page website: www.codyjudy.us

4) A feature or principle Blog that is over 2 years old with over 200 entries

5) Monetary support for my candidacy has come from multiple states of the Nation including Arizona, California,North Carolina,Minnasota,Utah,Oklahoma,and Texas.

6) Reports on my Campaign have come Nationally 6 times in publications in Iowa, Wyoming,Arizona, Utah


Thanks for all your hard work, and I sure will continue mine.I'm very proud to be apart of this case.

Cody Robert Judy
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODE4PRES

The New and Improved Birther Movement 2008-2012

The New and Improved Birther Movement 2008-2012
Comprehensive Look at New Hampshire’s Supreme Court Eligibility Complaint

Before the New Hampshire Supreme Court is a case that could shake the political world clear through the Washington Monument. Delving into Taitz v. Garner one sees a deck stacked against Obama in ways that are innovative and original from 2008 showing the Birther Movement has shape shifted into a much more intelligent force than it was in 2008, something Obama and co-conspiratorial Democrats of course were not hoping for when the Obama 2012 theme song was picked out, “I fought the law but the law won”.

Understanding the law has to some degree been left to the lawyers and judges so long that justice may have been left behind; there is no secret that in any case both sides indeed are given a chance to make their point of view hoping that justice will side their way.

While the body of evidence might be stacked to one side there are a host of elements and principles that also must be included in order to accommodate justice. “Standing” was a principle used for the most part against a U.S. Birther Movement in 2008 citing Citizens didn’t have standing to file suits favoring instead actual candidates in the Presidential Race (*9th Circuit).

*( http://thenewamerican.com/usnews/constitution/7235-challenge-to-president-obamas-eligibility-to-be-heard-by-9th-circuit-court )

In 2008 Obama had the advantage of the surprise attack from which the Birther Movement could not form and organize fast enough to block. Deals had been struck with the Republican candidates based on a Democrat controlled U.S. Senate giving Sen. John McCain non-binding U.S. Sen. Res. 511 declaring him a ‘natural born citizen’ with two citizen parents even though he was born in the foreign nation of Panama.

Until Obama was declared the Democrat Nominee independent and write-in candidates couldn’t really file complaints because the issue within the Democrat Party was not “ripe”. In other words, then Sen. Hillary Clinton would have been the best example from within the Democrat party to take a stand against Obama’s eligibility. Now, Obama’s fixed Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, was indeed a Co-Sponsor of McCain’s Res. 511. Not only was the valuable media ‘race card’ fixed (which raised its ugly head with Donald Trump in May of 2011), but so was Sen. Clinton’s *Campaign Debt.*( http://articles.cnn.com/2009-04-16/politics/clinton.debt_1_campaign-committee-clinton-s-campaign-hatch-act?_s=PM:POLITICS )

Once Obama cleared the entire Democrat Party his lock was sealed because Republicans had just nominated McCain as their nominee. Anyone not challenging McCain’s Eligibility would or could be called a racist for challenging Obama’s eligibility, and no one knew it better than the 2008 Republican U.S. Senators.

Days prior to McCain being made the nominee McCain v. Judy was filed in the Nevada Federal District Court challenging McCain’s qualifications according to the precepts of Supreme Court Precedent case Minor v. Happersett that maintained without question ‘natural born citizens’ being those whom were born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents, and an Emergency Motion was made in that case against Obama before he was sworn in that featured the case being argued by esq. Phil Berg at the Supreme Court that was dismissed on ‘Standing’ failures.

Phil Berg was stuck and decidedly kept from including Cody Robert Judy in his argument to the U.S. Supreme Court, although Judy had filed Amicus Curiae to him, it was never docketed.

After 3 years, Donald Trump was used to flush the Birther Movement once and for all, uniquely positioned as a Republican who had never held office, with the majority of his contribution money going to Democrats. Trump was rewarded June 22, 2011, with an NBC whopping $130 million dollar contract for Apprentice following the April 27th, 2011 release of Obama’s long form fabrication in spite of NBC’s *Lawrence O’Donnell’s exacerbated cries of Trump as a racist.

*( http://articles.businessinsider.com/2011-04-21/entertainment/30037350_1_donald-trump-hatred-racism )

In an era where television salaries are being slashed, long-term contracts are disappearing, and where so-called "Reality TV" (scripted television shows that do not pay their participants, or pay very low fees) is replacing quality programming a contract like this is irrelevant and abusive to the whole entertainment industry. One need only consider the political roots of MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell, who host “The Last Word” to understand the “Racist” tag that was a shot over the bow.

From 1989 through 1992, O'Donnell served as Senior Advisor to Sen. Daniel Patrick Moynihan. In 1992, he was Chief of Staff to the Senate Committee on the Environment and Public Works. From 1993 through 1995 he was the Chief of Staff of the Senate Finance Committee. He first began working with Sen. Moynihan as Director of Communications in the Senator's 1988 re-election campaign.

Indifference to the major networks patch work on Obama even now in a new * PPP poll a crushing 52% of Americans are part of the Birther Movement and the “Anti-Birther Crowd” is losing followers as fast as Newt in the Iowa polls today

*( http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2011/12/gingrich-collapses-iowa-ron-paul-surges-front/46360/ )

Heading into the Birther Movement 2012 one will see things that didn’t exist in 2008 in the form of growth, evidence, charges, and organization and this is translating itself into support for comprehensive legal work and political maneuvering with Candidates, Lawyers, and a Citizen population, SuperPacs, and many Patriot Organizations galvanized on the common thread among 50 States; The United States Constitution, and specifically Article II, Sect. 1, Clause 5’s demanding qualifications for the President.

New Hampshire has prided itself in supporting the United States Constitution and being the first State Primary to set the pace as a small but significant force in politics. Business is anything but usual in the first post-colonial sovereign north eastern state with what looks to be the most comprehensive well written legal challenge, with Presidential Candidate Cody Robert Judy representing STANDING in running as a Democrat, to remove Obama off the Ballot in front of the New Hampshire’s Supreme Court with the Primary still a month away.

In layman’s terms, the New Hampshire Supreme Court acting in the highest Judicial Body of law for New Hampshire, subject only to the U.S. Supreme Court, will see evidence of Obama not being qualified for President as a Natural Born Citizen from a presidential candidate within his own party, supported by 10 current members of New Hampshire’s State Legislature, and a lawyer whose the most experienced constitutional eligibility lawyer in the United States: Orly Taitz.

In addition the Court will see evidence supporting the long form birth certificate being a forged document, along with collaborating evidence supporting its forgery from Obama’s misappropriated Social Security identification, his altered draft registration and recent tax records, as well as a stacked or gerrymandered political panel making up the N.H. Election Law Commission.

Support for this action has come from thousands of hours of volunteers and contributors from Patriots all across the United States and its twin action has already been filed in the Georgia Federal District Court. One of the advantages of New Hampshire’s action is it’s at the State Supreme Court Level already with Candidates who have been kept off the ballot by Democrat Operatives for Obama shamefully representing a very small tent in the previously heralded big tent of the Democrat Party.

We here at the Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign headquarters would like to thank everyone who has helped us so far, and we would like to extend our appreciation for the State Senators everywhere who are standing up against the corruption and cronyism that has stained the Democrat Party. We are doing everything in our power to right the ship that has been hijacked by the elitist of the party. The Democrat Party has its roots embedded in the Constitution however many have forgotten about that in both parties.

Please extend your hand today so that we can make a charge in Texas. Now that Texas has 38 Electoral votes, four more than in 2008, and second only to California’s 55, one can see that Texas’ Winner-Take-All Electoral votes is a strategic objective for the Democrats in 2012 and we need to make sure Cody Robert Judy is on the ballot. The deadline for this Ballot is Feb 1st, 2011 so please make your contribution today in support of the Constitution Cody Robert Judy is standing up for so boldly and check out his new Three Ropes Initiative Platform page with a new featured video about the http://www.codyjudy.us/cody%20robert%20judy%204%20pres%202012%203%20ropes%20platform.htm ">3 Point Platform here:

( http://www.codyjudy.us/cody%20robert%20judy%204%20pres%202012%203%20ropes%20platform.htm )

www.codyjudy.us

Sincerely
Ms.Lori Grider
Western Regional Campaign Director
The Cody Robert Judy for President U.S.C Eligibility Campaign

UNPRECEDENTED ELIGIBILITY STATES RIGHTS FIGHT

FOR IMMEDIATE PRESS RELEASE:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pAEOeQ5KRDA&feature=channel_video_title


UNPRECEDENTED ELIGIBILITY STATES RIGHTS FIGHT



In an unprecedented constitutional move Democrat Candidate for President of the United States- Cody Robert Judy has teamed up with Dr. Orly Taitz Esq. in rolling out the red carpet for the Constitutional demand for a Natural Born Citizen and spotlighting the ineligibility of Barack Obama to meet that requirement in virtually every State of the Union contesting every Democrat Primary and Caucus in the United States in the 2012 Elections.



What makes this unprecedented in history? While the Federal Government has a jurisdiction over federal elections it is the States that ultimately make up the entire Federal Government and have power over candidates in the “ballot access” , and nowhere is that more apparently expressed than in U.S.C. Article X.



“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”



Every one of the 50 States has a State Elections Office wherein a challenge can be made to the individual State on the merits of Barack Obama’s eligibility and in most cases these are handled by an Attorney General of that State, or some Elections Law Commission designated by the States Legislature to by a type of Super Committee of elections.



These Election Law Commissions or authorized Committees are duly charged to screen candidates asking to be included on Primary Ballots and Caucuses. This could be the first place a candidate is vetted by a legal represented authority of the people after the candidate has declared him/herself a candidate to the Federal Election Commission.



What are candidates screened or vetted for at this level? They are screened and vetted for eligibility of the particular office they want to be elected to, and most often the Commission or State Elections Office, Secretary of State, or authorized individual charged with the task of accepting a candidates Declaration of Candidacy stating they are eligible also receive the money or fee from the candidate called for by the State to be included on the ballot of the State Primary.



Candidates at this level are indeed subject to Complaints and Objections as to the candidate’s legal or Constitutional qualifications set forth by law and most often these are directly sent to the States Attorney General’s Office for delegation of the Complaint to the body set forth by the State Legislatures for handling such complaints.



For example in New Hampshire the site of the first State Primary, Secretary of State William Gardner or his designee has removed at leasttwo candidates from previous New Hampshire ballots for constitutional ineligibility: Abdul K. Hassan, Esq., a naturalized citizen born in Guyana, and Sal Mohamed, who was born in Egypt and was naturalized as a citizen in 1983.



While most States grant ballot access to a candidate on face value, in other words they don’t question a candidates declarations, ballot access does not preclude litigation from proper plaintiffs to remove a candidate’s name from the ballot if the candidate does not satisfy the qualification for, in this case, President of the United States.



The term “proper plaintiffs” has been designated by the courts, by many dismissals of Barack Obama eligibility cases in 2008, to mean having proper standing or in other words, “a candidate for the same office”.



In the “Primary Stage of an Election” standing would be most importantly accepted fact to someone from the same Party, as it could be argued a challenge from a candidate from another party is not ripe for argument until the challenging candidate was indeed made the nominee of his/her respective Party.



One way to understand this is to picture a horserace and understand that when a jockey is weighed with his tack no less than a certain amount of weight can be placed upon a horse to make the race fair. If for example one horse was carrying 119 pounds and another horse 109 pounds the horse that is carrying the least amount of weight would have an advantage.



Of course the entire general audience can’t fit into a place to see every jockey weighed, so it comes to be that other jockeys can object to each other in front of the official standing in front of the scale. They have proper standing as they have entered and in such have paid the price to race. They stand to lose the most by an ‘unfair race’ to someone who has defiled the rules.



Rewind: 2008 the Democrat Party was plain and simply overwhelmed or beset by Barack Obama due in large part to Republican Candidate Sen. John McCain who was bestowed Non-binding U.S. Senate Resolution 511 co-sponsored by Sen. Hillary Clinton and Sen. Barack Obama and voted “yes” on by every Republican U.S. Senator save one: Sen. John McCain.



Evidence would support the fix for Obama was in already and Sen. Hillary Clinton knew all about it because she had nothing to gain from Sen. Res. 511, and Sen. Barack Obama had everything to gain by it namely the “Race Card”. If a single U.S. Senator raised his voice against Barack Obama’s Eligibility the “racist tag” would be so clear and present no elected official could stand it because of the Bestowed 511 McCain received, and no unelected official candidate either as was the case with Donald Trump who at one time had garnered the favor of 75% of the Republicans.



If McCain was given the pass on his Congressional Honorable Mention as a Natural Born Citizen born in the foreign nation of Panama, and Obama were questioned about his father being a Citizen from Kenya, East Africa, the major difference between McCain and Obama would be pounced on: “Color”.



Rather than lick their wounds and realize the war dog had become a whore dog to the Constitution, Republicans doubled down and bit their tongue hoping for a comeback in 2012.



This all happened in 2008 with the exception of one Presidential Candidate who ran as a conservative write-in: Cody Robert Judy. Cody sued Sen. John McCain first and the entire Republican National Committee and then he included Sen. Barack Obama before the 2008 candidates were even made nominees’ of the respective parties.



HELP CODY GET ON STATE BALLOTS http://www.codyjudy.us/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm



However the process of the 2008 Election Primaries were over when Mr. Judy filed his suit against McCain, although the timing could have been argued as perfect for standing because McCain was made the Republican Nominee 3 days after the suit was filed and Mr. Judy was not running as a Republican.



Fast forward: 2012 the Primaries have not begun but are set to begin in 1 month set first is the Iowa Caucus Jan. 3rd, and then New Hampshire’s first-in-the-nation-Primary January 10th, 2011 and the Democrat Party is set up for a collision with Cody Robert Judy running against Barack Obama as a “proper Plaintiff” filing complaint after complaint in every single state and what better attorney to represent the Constitutions fight then Orly Taitz. (See the Attachment on this file- Esquire Represenation Declaration)



In short we have the right candidate at the right time with the right legal professional fighting in every single state of the Union. Barack Obama may have had sympathizers in the United States Senate across the aisle because of their teeter tauter with McCain, but that quid pro quo didn’t happen with every single State attorney General and every single State Legislature in the entire country.


HELP CODY GET ON THE PRIMARY BALLOTS
http://www.codyjudy.us/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm


If just one state prohibits Obama from gaining access to the ballot the domino effect could officially end Barack Obama’s run in the White House. That’s why it is so important for you to spread the word, spread this story like wild fire because this decision is coming back to the people and its gaining momentum. Cody Robert Judy needs your help to pay his Primary Ballot access that could cost upwards of $1,000 per State.


In truth many will join as the wheel gets rolling but we Birthers who are on the front line have got to push with all of our might in order to get that wheel turning. The battle lines are drawn. If every person who watched Orly Taitz argument at the New Hampshire Election Law Commission Hearing just gave $2 dollars to Cody Robert Judy’s Campaign we could secure his name on the ballot of every State.

If you’re a Birther, and Article II Patriot and you haven’t contributed to Cody Robert Judy’s campaign, now you should understand what is happening and why that is so very important.


We invite you to tour the many pages of Cody Robert Judy that are new or improved from the last time you vistited including : CRJ Intro, CRJ TV ,the CRJ Bio page which has drop down links now to many of the issues that are important to you. On the official Cody Robert Judy for President web site at www.codyjudy.us we are dedicated to improvement and will continue to upgrade and pave.



The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign. We are looking for your help

Contribute:
http://www.codyjudy.us/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm

Volunteer:

http://www.codyjudy.us/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_008.htm

DOJ Election Trust Demands New Hampshire Revisit Obama on Primary Ballot‏

Dear New Hampshire DOJ Election Law:

Thank you, for your consideration of my letter/complaint. I am a candidate for office in the same party, and the same position as Barack Obama. Thus the argument of partisan politics does not enter into consideration of my complaint.

First let me say, I knew Mrs. Orly Taitz would have the problem of the Law Commission 11-18-2012, 2 pm hearing, saying they did not have jurisdiction over criminal matters when she brought up the alleged Social Security Number fraud and Fraudulent or Forged long form Birth Certificate.

However let me say, cooler thought prevailing, the criminal aspect of the allegations need not be considered to warrant prohibition on the Primary Ballot in the interest of protecting the Voter in the Primary Election from wasting a vote on a constitutionally unqualified candidate.

I hope my letter/complaint exhibits Barack Obama by his own release of his long form B.C. showed all of us, he was not eligible by the standards of a Natural Born Citizen showing his father is not a Citizen of the United States but is listed as an "Kenya ,East Africa" Citizen at the time of Obama's birth.






Of course this is in no way exhibited as a "racially prejudice fact", but as a "disqualification fact" that is based on demand of our Constitution's requirements for President, and this is the Supreme Law of the Land. These facts afford a removal from the Primary Ballot with the burden of further deliberation or review upon the candidate Barack Obama.

Obama holds by his own record and release of his Long Form Birth Certificate naturally a dual loyalty of inherited citizenship, which is forbidden by our Constitutions expressed demands for president as a Natural Born Citizen. This is a national security concern of voting citizens.

It does not need to be proven that it is forged or fraudulent. Obama's Released Long form birth certificate appeals to the hard facts as prohibitory for running as a qualified candidate, or holding, the office of President. If the intent of the Ballot Law Commission's review is to prohibit unqualified candidates from the ballot in the interest of the qualifying standards of office demanded by We The People through our Constitution, Obama's release of his long form birth certificate is where the facts come from that disqualifies him, and my witness stands against his qualification.

One interesting note to read regarding the Ballot Law Commission's Review:
http://www.sos.nh.gov/Ballot%20Law%20Commission/PDF%27s/Secretary%20of%20State%20vs.%20eight%20candidates%20on%20primary%20ballot.pdf " The Ballot law commission shall hear and determine disputes arising over whether nomination papers or declarations of candidacy filed with the secretary of state conform with law. The decisions of the ballot commission in such cases shall be final as to questions both of law and fact, and no court shall have jurisdiction to review such decision."

This is a absolute powerfully corrupt statement, as it places the review of decisions out of jurisdiction of the Judicial Branch's Court of law including the United States Supreme Court, while at the same time leaving the "Primary Voter" without an Appeal to very important and pertinent information that includes election law and fact meant to protect the integrity of actual qualified candidates as myself, and more importantly the trust that voters give in the hope they can at the very least participate in Democracy's Beacon of hope for the world, voting in the Primary for an actual qualified candidate.

Facts are hard to deny that are actually given by the Candidate to the Ballot Law Commission. Barack Obama need not agree whether forged or fraudulent facts; for that is not the issue. The issue, we all agree on: Obama has given these set of facts contained in his long form birth certificate, and from this, any decision allowing him on a Primary Ballot is knowingly presenting as a choice an unqualified candidate to Primary voters.

Knowingly presenting an unqualified candidate to Primary voters would be considered a dereliction of duty of the Ballot Law Commission.

You also have a point of entry and trust that needs to be considered by the Legislatures of New Hampshire, and the DOJ of New Hampshire, regarding the integrity of the voting system as an agent to justice, our Constitution, and the Republic for which we stand.

I hope my complaint to the DOJ in New Hampshire won't fall on deaf ears, and they will see the cracks in the side walk that need to be repaired.
Again here are the links that detail my complaint and warrant your immediate attention for the eyes of the Nation are on New Hampshire.

1- http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/11/18/presidential-candidate-adds-name-to-obama-election-complaint-in-new-hampshire/
2-http://codyjudy.blogspot.com/2011/11/complaint-joinder-ltr-new-hampshire.html
3- http://inagist.com/Drudge_Report/137577430402609152/
4-http://www.concordmonitor.com/article/293101/birther-challenges-obama?CSAuthResp=1321635127:kac5p0ac2a53k27d9iernpe2m5:CSUserId|CSGroupId:approved:C7BFB10B487EEBB060A53F45DE1EA54D&CSUserId=94&CSGroupId=1
5-http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=369241

Cody Robert Judy
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign codyjudy@hotmail.com
www.codyjudy.us www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODE4PRES

Complaint Joinder LTR: The New Hampshire Ballot Law Commission

Cody Robert Judy
Federal Election Commission Candidate & Committee Registration Number:
P20003372 FEC Candidate number 0003372.
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
3031 So. Ogden Ave. Suite #2
Ogden, UT. 84403
801
- - - -
The New Hampshire Ballot Law Commission
New Hampshire Legislative Building
33 North State Street
Concord, New Hampshire 03301-6328
(603) 271-3321
- - - -
Re:
Hearing is scheduled Friday at 2 p.m. in Room 307 of the New Hampshire Legislative Office Building, and
Cody Robert Judy-D Candidate for President, joining Taitz (Petitioner) demands removal of Obama from the New Hampshire Primary ballot.


On October 11,2011 William M. Gardner, New Hampshire Secretary of State, issued a statement regarding the importance of the New Hampshire Primary stating "It is probably the most important political decision each of us makes because our choice can affect the lives and happiness of ourselves and our children for years into our future."

Regarding the vital role of smaller states he elaborated New Hampshire’s primary since 1916 is first for a reason and said, "Worse yet, if a national primary was held, or if the role of small states was eliminated, only the very rich or famous candidates would be able to put on the major campaigns needed for victory or to exceed expectations".

One vital way that we preserve our democracy is to have an election system that allows for the long-standing American dream to come about that just about anyone can grow up to be President of the United States, and that our boys and girls going to school now could feel that our Constitutional Qualifications for President held in the U.S. Constitution are just as affective preserving their chances in the future as it did in1787.

The keys of our Commander-In-Chief are exclusively rewarded to only those who are Natural Born Citizens, or who were Citizens at the time of the adoption of our Constitution in 1787. The distinction of Citizen and Natural Born Citizen clearly made within the Constitution itself. The only other requirement is that of being 35 yrs of age and 14 years a resident within the U.S., which I do hereby present myself as to being qualified for as I was born in Idaho Falls, Idaho in 1965 to parents who were also generationally natural born citizens.

In 2008 I ran as a Write-In Candidate for President and filed suit in the Federal Court of Las Vegas, Nevada against Sen. John McCain and included Sen. Barack Obama in that law suit Judy v. McCain. I am familiar with the 'partisan politics' represented and the malign of our Constitution's requirements of Qualification for President into the slippery slope of racism which threatens to divide our country.

With that said, I represent the same fortitude and resolve that our Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land; our United States intact, and the Qualification demands as well in tact by the fact that nothing has been remitted or repealed by the required two thirds of both Houses of Congress enumerated in Article V, as to the Presidents Qualifications in Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5.

To this I witness by the power of my testimony, with standing as a Presidential Candidate that Barack Obama's own public release of his long form birth certificate, prohibits his running for President, or his occupation of said office even at this moment of time. He is not a Natural Born Citizen, which even by United States Supreme Court precedent in Minor v. Happersett acknowledges the definition of being born in the United States to citizen parents.

I acknowledge herein my desire to enter into the New Hampshire Primary as a Candidate for President, by said entry date of the 3rd Friday of November, 2011 upon the confirmation by The New Hampshire Ballot Law Commission that the Constitution's requirements are still in effect, and Barack Obama is prohibited from the New Hampshire Primary as a qualified candidate.

If this matter is extended by lawful decision, I herein also request that an extension of my entry fee of $1,000 be extended for the decision, or in lieu of merit are extended until after the Primary if necessary. For it is my only desire to enter a constitutionally legal Primary, and that such would clearly uphold the U.S. Constitution, in a Presidential Candidates Qualification, is reasonable expectation.

If the matter, by your decision, is to allow Barack Obama on the Primary Ballot of New Hampshire when he clearly by his own represented record is not a natural born citizen qualified under the Constitution's guidelines and Supreme Court Case precedent, then of course standards so long upheld and extolled by New Hampshire's own Secretary of State are null and void, as well the reputation held in high esteem of New Hampshire's Primary since 1916, nearly 100 years of its States tradition.

By this I adjoin my complaint to Mrs. Orly Taitz complaint by my own accord and witness herein freely and by my own liberty.

Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy /s/ Cody Robert Judy Dated : November 16th 2011
Democrat Candidate for President 2012
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODE4PRES
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign

Tell the Republican Party to Drop Dead?

http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/11/12/tell-the-republican-party-to-drop-dead/

While I share the frustration of all Birthers as an Article II Patriot alluding to Col Sellin sentiments I offer: while the "means" may be correct, (Voting Republican will simply delay the inevitable), the "Ends" ( it is better to let Obama win and allow a flawed two party system to collapse) does not provide an answer worthy of our Constitution.


With a two party collapse all Americans are still left at the drawing board as to "Who" to trust in defense of the Constitution?



I have been a defender of the Constitution continually with Federal Action as a leader in the Birther Movement. Its important to note that in The Birther Movement our Economy and National Defense are included very prominently in the balance. By no exaggeration our Economy and our National Defense are compromised with the Republican Candidates. I share that sentiment.



What I do not share is the 'hopelessness' represented in a "none of the above vote" and the presumptive nominee of the Democrat Party as Obama. Not all Republicans are corrupted, not all Independents are corrupted, and not all Democrats are corrupted. In fact, I believe whole heartedly that it is a very small percentage that is actually at work in the corruption. I believe we do out number them and that is why we can win IF those who are Birthers will actively start supporting my candidacy.



Listen, people are looking at the "Presumptive Nominee" of the Democrat Party as Obama instead of realizing what and how 'caucuses' work in the Democrat Party. I believe that is a fundamental error in political strategy by every Birther who is not actively lining up to support my candidacy.



Caucuses are won and lost by a majority. If you care about this country it makes sense to sign up as a Democrat, and line up at the State Caucus to vote for me and bring your friends. To share this vision please consider:

1) Obama's camp thinks he's a shoe-in and are not actively recruiting grass roots democrats to come out and support him in a Caucus that will in fact take place. Let's take the Iowa Caucus for Democrats in Iowa. Democrats are coinciding their Caucus with the Republican Caucus Jan 3rd, 2012.



2) Imagine if you will the media significance of all the Republicans and Independents walking into a Democrat Caucus and pulling a rabbit out of their hat with a WIN against Obama by Cody Robert Judy? This is far more important politically than wading through a list of 8 Republican Candidates in Iowa whose winner on the Republican side may or may not be the nominee anyway.

a.) Obama's base is ROCKED with the loss and its broadcast by the entire MEDIA!

b.) Who beat Obama? Its doesn't matter who won in the GOP, we have a LOSS already in the Obama scorecard to report. Imagine the Media sensation! Where was this Iowa Caucus Winner standing on Obama's Eligibility? The Question is BLOWN UP like it was when Donald Trump popped up and Republican Candidates see a wave, rather than catching the wave, and reconsider their perspective.



3) Iowa has a Veterans population, they have a farmer population, their are Iowans who love the Constitution. Who among us, the Birther Movement, has influence in these populations? Many retired Generals, and Majors, and Lt. Col's have influence and could use it in a focused fight! Quit trying to beat Obama in a General Election, the Republicans are not going to do it, sweeping the Constitution under the carpet as Patriots? They have long forgotten the "Creator" in the Declaration of Independence and the "Lord" in the Constitution seen in the Year of our Lord. Do you think God's really proud of the Republican's strategy and he's going to get behind it?



Do you think as George Washington penned " Let us raise a standard to which the wise and honest can repair. The event is in the hand of God", is so far fetched from the Iowa Caucus, if every single Birther in the Nation focuses on moving hell backwards in the Democrat Iowa Caucus by voting for Cody Robert Judy?



I am Cody Robert Judy, I am in the fight against Obama by myself. I am calling on all birthers for their help. Will you my fellow Birthers, in a depressed and disparaged state of mind think so hopelessly as to give up in the fight when you are needed most, all because the Republican Candidates won't comment on Obama's Eligibility? You'd rather leave the fight entirely? That represents loyalty to Obama and the Republican Party Candidates who keep their mouth shut. Is that where you'd like your loyalty to stand?



Well, I may not be able to win, but by God your going to see me in a political fight and your going to watch me lose. I wouldn't want you to miss the show you'll witness with your hands in your pockets on a $20, $50, or $100 dollar bill that may have provided a commercial to move Iowan's, me standing against Obama. You'll all be able to watch the tank run over the lone man standing against the tank in Tiananmen Square. You'll watch, and you'll have that on your conscience and God's witness against you for your in action just as much as you believe the 'in action of the GOP Candidates is contemptible.



Live with that and remember, a few can stand against a Tyrant in the Democrat Iowa Caucus, just as the brave King Leonidas and 300 Spartans funneled the enemy through the focused hot gates in the battle of Thermopylae. They may have lost or died, but all of Greece took notice.



Here is the Campaigns latest Commercial appropriately entitled : Faith, Family, & The Constitution

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yhDKQtaR38s
Cody Robert Judy

The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign

www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODE4PRES

Why Gov. Jon Huntsman would not be a good President America?

Why former Gov. Jon Huntsman would not be a good President America? He fails to protect, preserve, and defend the Constitution. Quite frankly Gov. Huntsman, with your inflated use of the word 'germane' in the following interview seen at the end of this post, I'm surprised you don't find running for President 'germane' to upholding the Constitution.


This email was sent to Mr. Huntsman at his campaign website between Oct. 10th and October 24th,2011 and the video at BirtherReport.com was loaded up on October 29th,2011.

Dear Mr. Jon Huntsman:
RE: 2 suggestions for you to change the tide.

I am a candidate for President on the Democrat side, and with your help I think a mutual benefit could take place-Obama called in by a Congress for verification of Constitutional Qualification Hearings.

1-Barack Obama is not a natural born citizen with a foreign born father- Our Constitution demands that only a natural born citizen is qualified to be President. There are no GOP Candidates who have the courage or political resume to bring this up with the main stream media without being labeled a racist, as Donald Trump was, accept for me(accept I'm running as a D), because of the strings attached to them with McCain’s good ole boy non-binding U.S. Sen. Resolution 511 endorsed by all Republicans.

I apposed McCain in Fed Court Judy v. McCain as well as Obama as a candidate in 2008 thus do not have the 'racist' tag around my neck. I hope and pray you will find that in running for President you now can be a bigger voice in support for the Constitutional Principle demanding a natural born citizen then Mr. Donald Trump.

You could help to unite The Birther Movement across party lines totally eliminating Obama from the Democrat nomination in 2012, as well as dismantling in history Obama as the legitimate 44th president of the United States made secure only by the biggest perpetrated fraud and forgery upon the American People in our history. Obama’s sitting in the White House is an embarrassment to our Nation, our Constitution, and the blood of all that has been defensively spilt and this by God cannot stand.

The Birther Movement among Republicans was around 75% who felt Obama was not qualified. While partisan politics may play out running for President, we should be able to come together for the Constitution and agree the law at the time of Obama's birth demanded "born in the U.S. with Citizen parents."

If you took this issue on by yourself, I think you'd be hammered just like Trump was. However, if you brought this up with me, with my resume in suing McCain, I believe you would gain a huge bump for courage in the Republican party setting your campaign out from all the rest. One only need ask the question, who would any of the Republican Candidates rather go up against in a General Election, myself or Obama?

That said, defending the Constitution and coming together with a Democrat Candidate for president in that common goal, would and could necessarily put many more Republicans and Independents in your corner as well as attracting for your campaign an infusion of courage.

The story of your coming out in support of Art 2, Sect 1, Clause 5 and calling our Constitution more than just rhetoric, and Obama a moron (referenced for Jon using the word that week) for thinking he could get away with it, would garner you tremendous support for standing for the truth while your fellow GOP Candidates for President were willing to sweep it under the carpet.

Its bold, beautiful, and could be the biggest national boost to separate you from the pack politically available. The key would be not to alienate someone like me who has been in the fight. I sued McCain before he was made the nominee at the RNC in 2008.

This could actually be seen as your reaching your hand across the aisle, because I am running as a Democrat. I was ready to offer my Birther Resume to Trump but he was a plant for Obama to release his Long Form B.C. and cement it without review and Oprah's endorsement. I believe the Presidential Race is the only arena that could bring this out again for review with the same force Obama tried to close it with putting out the forgery. With so many candidates in the GOP Presidential Race funds are hard to come by, and setting oneself apart even harder with voters. Standing up for the Constitution Mr. Huntsmen is never and could never be even framed as a bad thing when the President's job is to preserve and to protect it. I extend my hand to you in this patriotic endeavor.

Emailing me or calling the number and leaving a number for me to call back would probably be the best way to get together if you'd like to pursue this endeavor. "Utah boys make good on the Constitution", that’s the kind of story the restores faith in Government and Politics for our up and coming generations who are so demoralized by the crookedness and corruption that hope is all but lost.

Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us
codyjudy@hotmail.com

After Receiving this letter Gov. Huntsman blows it with the following remarks which refer our U.S. Constitution's demands for a President to be a natural born citizen as 'NonSensical". Quite frankly, I find running for President 'germane' to defending the U.S. Constitution Gov. Huntsman and I've found your position afar left of the Constitution along with your fellow Republican Candidates for President.